`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1053208
`
`Filing date:
`
`05/04/2020
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92073747
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`CI Radar, LLC
`
`CI RADAR LLC
`SUITE 1 4046 WETHERBURN WAY
`NORCROSS, GA 30092
`UNITED STATES
`mvanlaeke@ciradar.com
`no phone number provided
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Rexford Brabson
`
`rex@t-rexlaw.com
`
`/Rexford Brabson/
`
`05/04/2020
`
`Attachments
`
`2020.05.04-Answer.pdf(146217 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the matter of Trademark Registration No. 4707676
`Registrant: CI Radar, LLC
`Mark:
`CI RADAR
`
`
`
`
`Radar, LLC
`
`vs.
`
`CI Radar, LLC
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`Registrant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Cancellation No. 92073747
`)
`)
`)
`)
` )
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REGISTRANT CI RADAR, LLC’S ANSWER
`
`
`In response to Petitioner Radar, LLC’s (“Petitioner”) Petition to Cancel, Registrant CI
`
`Radar, LLC (“Registrant”) responds as follows:
`
`Registrant denies each and every allegation of the Petition to Cancel unless it is expressly
`
`admitted herein:
`
`1)
`
`Registrant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations of paragraph 1, and therefore, denies the same.
`
`2)
`
`Registrant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations of paragraph 2, and therefore, denies the same.
`
`Registrant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the
`
`3)
`
`
`
`
`
`allegations of paragraph 3, and therefore, denies the same.
`
`4)
`
`5)
`
`6)
`
`1)
`
`Admitted.
`
`Admitted.
`
`Denied. Registrants specifically deny the legal conclusions contained in paragraph 6.
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`First Affirmative Defense: The Petition to Cancel fails to state a claim upon which relief
`
`can be granted.
`
`2)
`
`Second Affirmative Defense: Registrant had use of the mark in commerce on all of the
`
`claimed services prior to the filing date of the application underlying the registration at
`
`issue in this Petition to Cancel.
`
`3)
`
`Third Affirmative Defense: Registrant alleges on information and belief that as a result of
`
`Petitioner’s own acts and/or omissions, the Petition to Cancel is barred by the doctrine of
`
`laches.
`
`4)
`
`Fourth Affirmative Defense: Registrant alleges on information and belief that the Petition
`
`to Cancel is barred by the doctrine of estoppel.
`
`5)
`
`Fifth Affirmative Defense: Registrant alleges on information and belief that as a result of
`
`its own acts and omissions, Petitioner has waived any right to pursue this Petition to
`
`Cancel.
`
`6)
`
`Sixth Affirmative Defense: Registrant alleges on information and belief that the Petition
`
`to Cancel is barred by the doctrine of acquiescence.
`
`7)
`
`Seventh Affirmative Defense: Registrant alleges on information and belief that the
`
`Petition to Cancel is barred by the doctrine of unclean hands.
`
`Eighth Affirmative Defense: Any and all acts alleged to have been committed by
`
`8)
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant were performed with lack of knowledge and lack of willful intent.
`
`
`
`
`May 04, 2020
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Rexford Brabson, Esq.
`
`Rexford Brabson
`T-Rex Law, P.C.
`Attorneys for Registrant
`5580 La Jolla Blvd. #393
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing REGISTRANT CI RADAR, LLC’S ANSWER
`is being electronically mailed to Petitioner’s attorney at the following address:
`
`
`EMMETT MCAULIFFE
`RIEZMAN BERGER PC
`7700 BONHOMME AVE, STE 700
`SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105
`UNITED STATES
`rem@riezmanberger.com
`
`
`/s/ Rexford Brabson, Esq.
`Rexford Brabson
`
`
`May 04, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site