throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1020526
`
`Filing date:
`
`12/05/2019
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92072279
`Defendant
`Luoyang Hangyuan E-commerce Co., Ltd.
`
`ÂL
`
`UOYANG HANGYUAN E-COMMERCE CO LTD
`301Â WESTÂ ST 13F E-BUSINESSÂ PARK BAOLONG,
`LUOLONGÂ DISTRICT
`LUOYANG, 471000
`CHINA
`2851218765@qq.com
`+8615825757150
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's email
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`Answer
`Francis koh
`fkohmail@gmail.com, ecptm@scienbizip.com, TMProce@scienbizip.com
`/Francis Koh/
`12/05/2019
`191205-HAIRCUBE-Answer-v1r00 - V2.pdf(454489 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`In the Matter of Reg. No.: 5780133 and 5774901
`Mark: HAIRCUBE
`
`Nir Ron
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Cancellation Proceeding
`) No. 92072279
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`Luoyang Hangyuan E-commerce Co., Ltd.
`
`
`Registrant.
`
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO PETITION TO CANCEL
`
`
`
`Registrant Luoyang Hangyuan E-commerce Co., Ltd. (“Registrant”), by and
`
`through undersigned counsel, hereby submits the following answers to Nir Ron’s
`
`(“Petitioner”) Petition to Cancel and states the following:
`
`
`
`1. Registrant admits that Petitioner Nir Ron dba H3 Hair Cubed appears to be a
`
`United States individual domiciled at 950 Laurel Grove Ave Studio City, CA 91604
`
`based upon his application.
`
`
`
` 2. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph 2 and therefore denies same.
`
`
`
`
`
` (cid:1005) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`3. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph 3 and therefore denies same.
`
`
`
` 4. Registrant admits that Petitioner’s trademark cancellation of U.S. Registration
`
`No. 4026264. Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations of the Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 4 and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with
`
`respect thereto.
`
`
`
`5. Registrant admits that Petitioner’s applied-for mark
`
` with serial no.
`
`88446156. Registrant denies the allegations to Petitioner’s arguments in favor of
`
`cancellation on grounds of Priority and likelihood of confusion.
`
`
`
`6. Registrant admits that Registrant Luoyang Hangyuan E-commerce Co.,Ltd. is a
`
`Chinese limited liability company with a principal business address of 301 West
`
`St.1,3F,E-business Park, Baolong Luolong Dist., LUOYANG CHINA 471000.
`
`
`
`7. Registrant admits that on November 5, 2018, Registrant applied to register the
`
`mark HAIRCUBE in standard character form with serial No. 88180982 in international
`
`class 003 with an alleged first use in commerce as of September 01, 2018 for Colognes,
`
`perfumes and cosmetics; Cosmetic hand creams; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations
`
`for body care; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Face creams for cosmetic use;
`
`
`
` (cid:1006) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`Facial masks; Lip stains; Lipstick; Make-up removing lotions; Nail paint; Nail polish
`
`remover pens; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Cleansing creams; Cosmetic creams for
`
`skin care; Cosmetic preparations for protecting the skin from the sun's rays; Cosmetic
`
`preparations for removing gel nails, acrylic nails, and nail polish; Cosmetic products in
`
`the form of aerosols for skincare; Cosmetics for children.
`
`
`
` 8. Registrant admits that Registrant’s application serial No. 88180982 was
`
`registered on June 18, 2019 with Registration No. 5780133.
`
`
`
` 9. Registrant admits that on November 5, 2018, Registrant applied to register the
`
`mark HAIRCUBE in standard character form with serial No. 88181048 in international
`
`class 005 with an alleged first use in commerce as of September 01, 2018 for Aerosol
`
`dispensers for medical use sold filled with hair growth stimulants; Analgesics; Anti-
`
`inflammatories; Cytostatics for medical purposes; Hair growth stimulants; Human
`
`growth hormone; Medical plasters; Medicated hair care preparations; Medicated hair
`
`serums; Medicated skin soap; Medicinal herbs; Medicinal oils; Medicinal preparations
`
`for stimulating hair growth; Sterilizing preparations; Sticking plasters for medical use;
`
`Dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; Medicated balms for treatment of hair;
`
`Medicated lotions for hair; Medicated serums for treatment of hair Medicinal hair
`
`growth preparations.
`
`
`
`
`
` 10. Registrant admits that Registrant’s application serial No. 88181048 was
` (cid:1007) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`registered on June 11, 2019 with Registration No. 5774901.
`
`
`
`11. Registrant admits that Registrant’s Registrations 5774901 and 5780133 are
`
`hereinafter referred to as Registrant’s Marks.
`
`
`
`12. Registrant admits that On August 20, 2019, Petitioner’s Mark received a non-
`
`final office action initially refusing to register Petitioner’s Mark in view of U.S.
`
`Registration Nos. 5774901 and 5780133 for the HAIRCUBE mark. Registrant is
`
`without knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s paragraph
`
`No. 12 and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
` 13. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph 13 and therefore denies same.
`
`
`
` 14. Paragraph No. 14 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 14 and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`
`
`15. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph 15 and therefore denies same. Registrant denies
`
`
`
` (cid:1008) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`the allegations to Petitioner’s arguments in favor of cancellation on grounds of Priority
`
`of Use.
`
`
`
`16. Registrant admits that Petitioner conducted an investigation, reasonable in scope,
`
`regarding Registrant’s first use in commerce of Registrant’s Marks. Registrant denies
`
`the allegations to Petitioner’s arguments in favor of cancellation on grounds of Priority
`
`of Use.
`
`
`
`17. Paragraph No. 17 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 17 and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`
`
`18. Paragraph No. 18 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 18 and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`
`
`19. Paragraph No. 19 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 19 and therefore
`
`
`
` (cid:1009) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`denies same.
`
`
`
`20. Paragraph No. 20 represents determinations of fact and conclusions of law to
`
`which no answer is required. To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of
`
`paragraph 20 and therefore denies same.
`
`
`
`21. Paragraph No. 21 represents determinations of fact and conclusions of law to
`
`which no answer is required. To the extent an answer is required, Registrant lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of
`
`paragraph 21, and therefore denies same. Additionally, the pronunciation of
`
`Petitioner’s Mark H3 HAIR CUBED is different from that of Registrant’s Mark
`
`HAIRCUBE because they differ in prefix. Registrant’s Mark HAIRCUBE is the literal
`
`translation of Chinese characters “发” and “立方”, which refer to “HAIR” and “CUBE”
`
`in English. Please see FIG. 1 below. The Petitioner’s Mark H3 HAIR CUBED is
`
`enclosed and limited within a design while Registrant’s Mark HAIRCUBE is in
`
`standard format.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (cid:1010) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`FIG. 1.
`
`
`
`22. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph 22 and therefore denies same, and to the extent an
`
`answer is required, Registrant denies the allegations of similarity and likelihood of
`
`
`
` (cid:1011) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`confusion.
`
`
`
`23. Paragraph No. 23 represents determination of facts and conclusions of law to
`
`which no answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`
`form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph No. 23 and leaves Petitioner
`
`to its proofs with resect thereto.
`
`
`
`24. Paragraph 24 represents determination of facts and conclusions of law to which
`
`no answer is required, Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 24 and therefore denies same.
`
`Additionally, Petitioner’s goods in Class 005 are non-medicated while Registrant’s
`
`goods in Class 005 are medicinal. Petitioner’s goods in Class 005 are mainly for hair
`
`while Registrant’s goods in Class 003 are for skin care. Customers can distinguish
`
`Petitioner’s goods from Registrant’s goods by their packaging and product descriptions.
`
`Please see and compare FIG. 2 and 3 below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (cid:1012) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`FIG. 2
`
`Packaging of Petitioner’s goods:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (cid:1013) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`
`
`

`

`FIG. 3
`
`Packaging of Registrant’s goods:
`
`
`25. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegations of paragraph No. 25 and therefore denies same.
`
`
`
`26. Paragraph No. 26 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 26 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`27. Paragraph No. 27 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
` (cid:1005)(cid:1004) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`
`
`

`

`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 27 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`28. Registrant denies the allegations of Paragraph No. 28, Registrant asserts that
`
`Petitioner lacks the legal basis to require a license or permission from Registrant, and
`
`further, Registrant’s use was in good faith.
`
`
`
`29. Paragraph No. 29 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 29 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`30. Paragraph No. 30 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 30 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`31. Paragraph No. 31 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 31 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
` (cid:1005)(cid:1005) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`32. Registrant denies the allegations of paragraph No. 32.
`
`
`
`33. Registrant denies the allegations of paragraph No. 33.
`
`
`
`34. Registrant admits the allegations of Paragraph No. 34 as Registrant did create
`
`on its own and use its Mark, HAIRCUBE, in Class 003 and Class 005 in good faith
`
`without any plagiarisms. Registrant has been selling, marketing, advertising its
`
`products bearing its Mark HAIRCUBE through its cumulative advertising efforts of
`
`over the years via print medium and on-line medium without any connection or
`
`affiliation with Petitioner.
`
`
`
`
`
`35. Registrant denies the allegation of paragraph No. 35.
`
`36. Paragraph No. 36 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required. To
`
`the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 36 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`37. Paragraph No. 37 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required. To
`
`the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 37 and therefore denies the same
`
`
`
` (cid:1005)(cid:1006) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`38. Registrant denies the allegations of paragraph No. 38. Petitioner’s U.S.
`
`Registration No. 4026264 was filed on March 23, 2011 and canceled on Apr. 20, 2018.
`
`Over the past eight years, Petitioner’s applied for mark
`
` with Serial No.
`
`88446156 on May 24, 2019 with only a photograph of its product as a specimen and
`
`failed to provide any verification/declaration or supporting documents. Petitioner’s
`
`petition to cancel is filed in bad faith.
`
`
`
`39. Paragraph No. 39 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required. To
`
`the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 39 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`40. Paragraph No. 40 represents conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
`
`To the extent that an answer is required, Registrant is without knowledge sufficient to form
`
`a belief as to the allegations of Petitioner’s Paragraph No. 40 and therefore denies the same
`
`and leaves Petitioner to its proofs with respect thereto.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Registrant respectfully requests that the Petition for Cancellation
`
`be denied and the registration(s) be maintained.
`
`
`
` (cid:1005)(cid:1007) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 05, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Francis H. Koh/
`Francis H. Koh
`Koh Law Firm, LLC.
`4800 Hampden Lane, St. 200
`Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
`United States
`301-881-3600
`fkohmail@gmail.com
`TMProce@scienbizip.com
`ecptm@scienbizip.com
`Attorneys for Registrant
`Luoyang Hangyuan E-commerce Co., Ltd.
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Registrant’s verified
`answer to petition for cancellation has been served on Petitioner’s Attorneys by
`forwarding said copy on December 05, 2019, via email to:
`
`ADRIANO PACIFICI
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTING LLC
`334 CARONDELET ST STE B
`NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
`UNITED STATES
`Phone: 504-323-6600
`apacifici@iplawconsulting.com
`trademarks@iplawconsulting.com
`Attorneys for Nir Ron
`
`
`
`Dated: December 05, 2019
`
`By: /Francis H. Koh/
`Francis H. Koh
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (cid:1005)(cid:1008) / (cid:1005)(cid:1008)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket