`ESTTA1033961
`02/06/2020
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92067777
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Plaintiff
`Akasa (Europe) Limited
`
`STEVEN M RABIN
`RABIN & BERDO PC
`1101 14TH STREET NW, SUITE 500
`WASHINGTON, DC 20005
`UNITED STATES
`firm@rabinberdo.com, salprin@rabinberdo.com, hzhang@rabinberdo.com
`202-371-8976
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Plaintiff's Notice of Reliance
`
`M. Scott Alprin
`
`salprin@rabinberdo.com, firm@rabinberdo.com
`
`/M. Scott Alprin/
`
`02/06/2020
`
`Akasa Europe v. Akaso Tech - Testimony - Pet. - Ex. C - NOR 1 - Ex. C to C1
`(P's Interrogs.).pdf(729477 bytes )
`
`
`
`Exhibit C
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEAMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Cancellation No.: 92067777
`
`Registration No. 4389656 (petitioned)
`
`Mark: AKASO
`
`
`Akasa (Europe) Limited,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Akaso Tech LLC,
`
`Respondent.
`
`
`PETITIONER’S FIRST NOTICE OF RELIANCE
`
`Petitioner Akasa (Europe) Limited (“Petitioner”), by its undersigned attorneys and
`
`pursuant to Rules 2.120, 2.122, and 2.123 of the Trademark Rules of Practice, hereby gives
`
`notice to Respondent Akaso Tech LLC (“Respondent”) and the Board that it intends to rely at
`
`trial on the following material evidence, generally relevant to the issues raised by the pleadings
`
`herein, and specifically relevant to the question of whether the petitioned registered mark would
`
`be likely to cause confusion with Petitioner’s mark, whether the petitioned registration should be
`
`cancelled due to nonuse at the time of filing of the application, and whether the mark in the
`
`petitioned registration has been abandoned:
`
`Petitioner’s Interrogatories / Respondent’s Responses
`
`(These documents are relevant for the reasons stated in the first paragraph hereabove)
`
`1. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Petitioner’s Revised First Set of
`
`Interrogatories, as sent by Petitioner on March 22, 2019. See Exhibit C1.
`
`2. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Respondent’s Objections And Responses
`
`To Petitioner’s Revised First Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-24), as sent by Respondent
`
`on April 17, 2019. See Exhibit C2. [Under Seal]
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`3. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Petitioner’s Second Set of Interrogatories,
`
`as sent by Petitioner on June 27, 2019. See Exhibit C3.
`
`4. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Respondent’s Objections And Responses
`
`To Petitioner’s Second Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 25-34), w as sent by Respondent on
`
`April 17, 2019. See Exhibit C4. [Under Seal]
`
`Petitioner’s Requests for Admission / Respondent’s Responses
`
`(These documents are relevant for the reasons stated in the first paragraph hereabove, and for
`authenticating documents produced by Respondent)
`
`
`5. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Petitioner’s First Set Of Requests For
`
`Admission, as sent by Petitioner on January 20, 2019. See Exhibit C5.
`
`6. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy Respondent’s Objections And Responses To
`
`Petitioner’s First Set Of Requests For Admission (Nos. 1-62), as sent by Respondent on
`
`March 21, 2019. See Exhibit C6. [Under Seal]
`
`Petitioner’s Requests for Documents / Respondent’s Responses and Documents
`
`(These documents are relevant for the reasons stated in the first paragraph hereabove)
`
`7. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Petitioner’s First Request For Production
`
`Of Documents And Things, as sent by Petitioner on January 20, 2019. See Exhibit C7.
`
`8. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of Respondent’s First Request For
`
`Production Of Documents And Things, as sent by Respondent on March 21, 2019. See
`
`Exhibit C8.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`9. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section 2.122, a copy of documents produced by Respondent, as
`
`sent by Mr. Allen Xue on May 31, 2019 (and as authenticated through Respondent’s
`
`Respondent’s Objections And Responses To Petitioner’s First Set Of Requests For
`
`Admission (Nos. 1-62). See Exhibit C8-1 ~ C8-5. [Under Seal]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 5, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AKASA (EUROPE) LIMITED
`
`__/M. Scott Alprin/____________________
`
`Steven M. Rabin
`Hui Zhang
`M. Scott Alprin
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`RABIN & BERDO, P.C.
`Suite 500, 1101 14th Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel: (202) 371-8976
`Fax: (202) 408-0924
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the PETITIONER’S FIRST NOTICE
`
`OF RELIANCE has been served on counsel for Respondent, Trina Longo, by e-mail, on
`
`February 5, 2020, at the following e-mail addresses:
`
`tlongo@nkllaw.com
`docket@nkllaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/M. Scott Alprin/______
`M. Scott Alprin
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`----------------------------------------------------- )
`)
`)
`
`AKASA (EUROPE) LIMITED,
` )
`Petitioner,
`)
`
`)
`Cancellation No. 92067777
`)
`)
` )
`AKASO TECH LLC,
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`Respondent.
`)
`)
`----------------------------------------------------- )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioned Registration No.: 4389656
`
`Mark: akaso
`
`
`Exhibit C1
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REVISED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
`
`
`Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 2.120 of the
`
`Trademark Rules of Practice (37 C.F.R. § 2.120), Petitioner, Akasa (Europe) Limited
`(hereinafter, “Petitioner”) serves its Revised First Set of Interrogatories upon Respondent,
`Akaso Tech, LLC (hereinafter, “Respondent”), to be answered fully in writing under oath.
`A copy of the answer shall be served upon Petitioner’s counsel within ten (10) days after
`the service hereof. To the extent permitted by Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`Procedure, these interrogatories are to be deemed continuing and the answers hereto are
`to be supplemented promptly upon Respondent’s acquisition of further or additional
`information. The Board’s standard protective order is applicable, and objections based on
`confidentiality are generally inappropriate.
`
`If Respondent does not agree to serve responses to these interrogatories within ten
`
`(10) days of service, that is, by April 1, 2019, Petitioner respectfully requests that the
`parties request guidance from the interlocutory attorney in this matter to determine an
`appropriate date for service.
`
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
`
`
`All interrogatories are to be answered on the basis of Respondent’s knowledge or
`
`information and belief, including that of its officers, employees, directors, or agents
`having such knowledge. If any answer is given on information and belief, such fact
`should be stated in the answer.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`If any information called for in any interrogatory is being withheld on the grounds
`
`that it is subject to the attorney-client privilege or any other privilege, Respondent is
`hereby directed to state with respect to such interrogatory that the information is being
`withheld and state the alleged ground of the privilege.
`
`
`
`
`The following definitions are applicable herein:
`
`1. The terms “Respondent” and “you” or “yours” mean and refer to the Respondent,
`Akaso Tech, LLC, its subsidiaries and any merged or acquired subsidiaries; its
`predecessors, or controlled, controlling, or affiliated companies; and Respondent’s
`past and present officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, all to the
`fullest extent the context permits.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. The term “Petitioner” means and refers to the Petitioner, Akasa (Europe) Limited,
`and includes the Petitioner herein, its predecessors in business, and their officers,
`directors, agents, employees, and attorneys, both present and past.
`
`3. The terms “Respondent’s Mark,” and similar terms (such as “its trademarks” in the
`proper context) means and refers to Respondent’s alleged trademark for “AKASO”
`and any and all marks including the term “AKASO,” in any form, regardless of
`color and stylization.
`
`4. The term “Respondent’s Registration” and similar terms means and refers to U.S.
`Reg. No. 4389656; the term “Respondent’s Application” and similar terms means
`and refers to U.S. Ser. No. 87796108; the term “Respondent’s mark” means and
`refers to Respondent’s alleged “AKASO” mark.
`
`5. The term “Respondent’s Goods” and similar terms means and refers to all of the
`goods listed in Respondent’s Registration (“Tablet computer”) and Application
`(“Computers; Tablet computers; Notebook computers; Computer peripheral
`devices; Computer memory devices; Covers for tablet computers; Downloadable
`computer software for editing images, voice, videos; Photo printer; Pedometers;
`Time recording apparatus; Face recognition security devices; Electronic
`identification device for animals; Photocopiers; Wireless electronic scales; Light-
`emitting electronic pointers; Smartphones; Covers for smartphones; Smartwatches;
`Wearable activity trackers; Radio receivers; Video monitoring apparatus; Video
`baby monitors; Camcorders; Portable media players; Set-top boxes; Photographic
`projectors; Mini beam projectors; Audio speakers; Wireless speakers; Audio
`equipment for vehicles, namely, stereos, speakers, amplifiers, equalizers, crossovers
`and speaker housings; Radios; Virtual reality headsets; Earphones and
`headphones; Microphones; Electronic book readers; Car video recorders;
`Cameras; Lens filters; Stands for photographic apparatus; Cases especially made
`for photographic apparatus and instruments; Directional compasses; Temperature
`indicators; Telescopes; USB cables; Switches, electric; Electrical plugs and sockets;
`Remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos; Protective helmets for sports;
`
`2
`
`
`
`Goggles for sports; Snow goggles; Swim goggles; Burglar alarms; Electric door
`bells; Digital door locks; Eyeglasses; Sunglasses; Rechargeable batteries; Chargers
`for electric batteries; Diver's masks”), and any other goods that may have been used
`under Respondent’s Mark in the United States.
`
`6. The term “Petitioner’s Mark,” and similar terms means and refers to the “AKASA”
`mark, as applied for in Application Ser. No. 87424540.
`
`7. The term “Petitioner’s Application,” and similar terms means and refers to the
`application set forth in Par. 6 immediately above.
`
`8. The term “Petitioner’s Goods,” and similar terms means and refers to all of the
`goods listed in Petitioner’s Application (“Computer hardware; Computer
`peripherals”), and any other goods that may have been used under Petitioner’s mark
`in the United States.
`
`9. The terms “commerce” and “U.S. commerce” shall have the meaning ascribed to the
`term “commerce” as set forth in the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1127 and related
`federal case law.
`
`10. The term “use,” “uses,” or “used” shall mean, unless specifically stated otherwise,
`use in connection with U.S. commerce as defined above.
`
`11. The term “person” refers to both natural persons and to corporate or other business
`entities, partnerships, groups, associations, governmental entities, or other
`organizations.
`
`12. The term “document” is used herein in its customary broad sense as defined in
`FRCP 34(a)(1), and includes, without being limited to, the original and all copies
`(carbon, photocopy, photographic, microfilm, or otherwise) of any advertising or
`promotional material (including, without limitation, art work, copies of drafts
`thereof, proofs, tear sheets, scripts, storyboards, etc.), brochures, business cards,
`travel tickets, lodging confirmations, lists of customers, lists of customer inquiries,
`rate schedules, letters, correspondence, customer or other complaints, books,
`journals, ledgers, working papers, invoices, contracts, purchase orders, estimates,
`reports, memoranda, interoffice communications, records, studies, appraisals, papers,
`charts, recordings of or memoranda of any conversation (by telephone or otherwise),
`meeting or conference, or any other writing however produced or reproduced; all
`other handwritten, typed, printed, or otherwise visually or aurally reproduced
`materials, whether copies or originals, including, but not limited to, letters, cables,
`wires, memoranda, and interoffice communications; reports, notes, minutes, and
`recordings; drawings, blueprints, sketches, charts, photographs, microfilm records,
`data compilations, and movies; copyrights, copyright registration applications,
`patents, trademarks, patent applications, trademark applications, assignments,
`contracts, agreements, licenses, and other official documents and legal instruments;
`published material of any kind; annual reports, reports to shareholders and minutes
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or reports of meetings of directors or executive boards or committees; advertising or
`promotional literature and press releases; engineering notebooks and data; and
`ledgers, bills, orders, books, records, and files that are in the possession, custody or
`control of Respondent or any of its officers, agents, or employees and/or
`Respondent’s attorneys. The term “document” or “documents” also includes all
`copies that are not identical with the original.
`
`
`13. The term “identify” as used herein means:
`
`(a) in the case of a natural person, to state for each person his or her: (i) full name; (ii)
`present residence address and telephone number; (iii) present business address and
`telephone number; (iv) present position, business affiliation, and job description;
`and (v) if any of the information set forth in (i)~(iv) is unknown, so state and set
`forth the corresponding last known such information;
`(b) in the case of a corporation or other business entity, to state for each corporation or
`business entity: (i) its full name; (ii) its legal form (i.e., corporation, partnership,
`etc.) and state of incorporation or legal formation; (iii) its address and principal
`place of business; (iv) the identity of officers or other persons having knowledge of
`the matter with respect to which the corporation or entity is named; and (v) the
`connection to Respondent’s response; and
`(c) in the case of a document, to state for each document: (i) the identity of the
`person(s) originating and preparing it and the sender; (ii) its general type (e.g.,
`letter, memo, report, invoice, etc.), title, identifying number and the general nature
`of its subject matter; (iii) the identify of the addressees and distributes, if any; (iv)
`its date of preparation; (v) its date and manner of transmission, distribution and
`publication, if any; (vi) the location of each copy (including title, index number and
`location of the file in which it is kept or from which it was removed) and the
`identity of the present custodian of persons responsible for its filing or other
`disposition; and (vii) the identity of persons who can authenticate or identify it.
`
`14. As used herein, “and” as well as “or” shall be construed either disjunctively or
`conjunctively as necessary in order to bring within the scope of the request all
`documents and things which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope.
`
`
`15. As used herein, the singular shall always include the plural and the present tense
`shall always include the past tense.
`
`16. The term “thing” as used herein refers to any tangible object other than a document,
`and includes objects of every kind and nature such as, but not limited to, prototypes,
`models, specimens, computer disks and tapes, videotapes and audiotapes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTERROGATORIES
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 1:
`
`
`
`
`
`Identify each officer of Respondent.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 2:
`
`Identify each predecessor, parent, subsidiary, and affiliated company of
`
`
`Respondent.
`
`Interrogatory No. 3:
`
`Identify and describe all goods or services in connection with which Respondent
`
`
`has used Respondent’s Mark in the United States, and for each such usage provide the
`date of first use in commerce, if applicable, and last use in commerce, if applicable.
`
`Interrogatory No. 4:
`
` Describe the circumstances, methods and reasoning surrounding Respondent’s
`
`selection of Respondent’s trademarks, including the specific individual who thought of
`the name AKASO.
`
`Interrogatory No. 5:
`
`State whether any searches or investigations were conducted by Respondent or
`
`
`any person on its behalf (including its attorneys) to determine whether Respondent’s
`trademarks were available for use and registration in the United States and, if so, identify
`each such search or investigation.
`
`Interrogatory No. 6:
`
`State Respondent’s annual expenditures (including predecessor(s)-in-interest)
`
`
`since the year 2010 for advertising and promoting Respondent’s Goods under its
`trademarks in the United States.
`
`Interrogatory No. 7:
`
`Identify a representative sample of all labels, hangtags, wrappers, containers,
`
`
`advertisements, pamphlets, catalogs, and brochures which contain or bear Respondent’s
`Mark as used in the United States.
`
`Interrogatory No. 8:
`
`Identify each person employed by Respondent and each outside agent or agency
`
`
`retained by Respondent who has been or now is responsible for (a) marketing, advertising
`and promotion, and (b) bookkeeping and accounting with respect to any goods or services
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`offered for sale or sold under Respondent’s Mark, or any variations thereof, in the United
`States.
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 9:
`
`Identify types of media through which Respondent has advertised or promoted its
`
`
`goods or services under Respondent’s Mark, including websites designed to sell products.
`
`Interrogatory No. 10:
`
`For each of Respondent’s Goods, set forth the approximate dollar amount of
`
`
`Respondent’s annual sales in U.S. commerce of such goods or services since the year
`2010.
`
`Interrogatory No. 11:
`
`State whether Respondent or any person acting for or on behalf of Respondent has
`
`
`received any communication, oral or in writing, from any person, inside or outside of the
`United States, which suggests, implies, or infers that, due to reasons related to
`Respondent’s Mark or Petitioner’s Mark, Respondent may be connected or associated
`with Petitioner or any other corporation, or which comprises any inquiry as to whether
`there is or may be or which evidences any such connection or association.
`
`Interrogatory No. 12:
`
`Identify the trade channels through which Respondent has sold and now is
`
`offering and selling goods under Respondent’s Mark.
`
`Interrogatory No. 13:
`
`Identify the witnesses Respondent intends to call to testify on its behalf in
`
`connection with this proceeding and state the facts or subject matter concerning which
`they are each expected to testify.
`
`Interrogatory No. 14:
`
`Identify the documents upon which Respondent intends to rely in connection with
`
`this proceeding.
`
`Interrogatory No. 15:
`
`Respondent’s specimen of use for Respondent’s Registration (Reg. No. 4389656), which
`was filed on June 13, 2013 and depicts Respondent’s “tablet computer” bearing the
`“AKASO” mark as follows,
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`
`appears to show the printed wording on the product slightly misaligned. Please indicate
`if Respondent can produce an actual product being the same make and model as the
`product shown in the specimen of use that could be examined by Petitioner. If not, please
`indicate if Respondent can produce any additional pictures of the product being the same
`make and model as the product shown in the specimen of use that could be examined by
`Petitioner.
`
`Interrogatory No. 16:
`
`Respondent’s specimen of use for Respondent’s Registration, which was filed on June 13,
`2013 and depicts Respondent’s “tablet computer” bearing the “AKASO” mark as follows,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`7
`
`
`
`also displays a website printed on the product, namely, www.tabletexpress.com. Please
`describe the past and current affiliation between Respondent and this website.
`
`Interrogatory No. 17:
`
`On the LinkedIn page for TabletExpress, at
`https://www.linkedin.com/company/tabletexpress/, the following is stated:
`
`
`TabletExpress is a U.S.-based manufacturer and distributor. Our goal is to
`provide high-quality products at affordable prices. Dragon Touch®,
`AKASO®,KingPad® and Tabsuit® are our sub brands, which already
`have a very good reputation.
`
`
`Please indicate if “AKASO” is a sub brand of TabletExpress. If not, please provide an
`explanation for the inaccuracy set forth on the TabletExpress LinkedIn page.
`
`Interrogatory No. 18:
`
`Paragraphs 8 and 9 in the Petition for Cancellation filed in this matter on January 22,
`2018 state the following:
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, Respondent’s website, at
`
`http://www.tabletexpress.com/, indicates that “tablet computers” are not marketed
`
`under the “akaso” mark. The following image from the website shows the four product
`
`categories under the “akaso” mark in a dropdown menu, namely, action cameras, security
`
`cameras, projectors, and TV boxes, as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, Respondent’s “tablet computers” are marketed and
`
`sold under the name “Dragon Touch,” as shown on Respondent’s website, as follows:
`
`
`It is noted that Respondent responded to Paragraph 9 of the Petition in its Answer as
`follows: “Paragraph 9 is admitted to the extent that it currently markets and sells tablet
`computers under the mark ‘Dragon Touch.’” Does this mean that Respondent is no
`longer marketing and selling tablet computers under the “AKASO” mark? Please clarify,
`including an indication of the date on which the last sale of tablet computers under the
`“AKASO” mark occurred. If Respondent is no longer marketing and selling tablet
`computers under the “AKASO” mark, please indicate if Respondent has any intention of
`resuming use in commerce of the “AKASO” mark in connection with tablet computers.
`If so, please indicate the steps that have been taken to resume use in commerce of the
`“AKASO” mark, if any, and the expected timeline for re-commencing use in commerce.
`
`Interrogatory No. 19:
`
`It appears that www.tabletexpress.com now redirects to
`https://www.dragontouch.com/. Please describe the past and current relationship
`between Respondent and the company operating as Dragon Touch at
`https://www.dragontouch.com/.
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 20:
`
`At https://www.akaso.net/, Respondent’s products are listed as follows:
`
`
`
`Please indicate if this list of products is accurate.
`
`Interrogatory No. 21:
`
`The date of first use in commerce of Respondent’s Mark as set forth in both
`
`Respondent’s Registration and Respondent’s Application is May 9, 2013. Please advise
`if Respondent intends to rely on this date as its date of first use in commerce of its mark.
`If not, please indicate the actual date of first use in commerce upon which Respondent
`intends to rely in this matter. It is noted that the application for Respondent’s
`Registration was filed on November 5, 2012, and Petitioner understands that Respondent
`will likely assert this date as the date on which its constructive rights for its mark
`commenced in the United States.
`
`Interrogatory No. 22:
`
`
`If any of the answers to Request for Admissions Nos. 1 and 5 through 61 are
`denied, please indicate the date of first use in commerce for the subject good(s) of each
`Request, and identify any documentation evidencing use in commerce of the subject
`good(s) of each Request.
`
`
`If the answers to Request for Admissions No. 1 is denied, please indicate the date
`of first use in commerce for the subject good of the Request, and identify any
`documentation evidencing use in commerce of the subject good of the Request.
`
`Interrogatory No. 23:
`
`Identify each person who participated in the preparation of Respondent’s
`
`responses to the foregoing interrogatories or furnished any information in response
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`thereto, and for each specify the interrogatory response for which each such person
`provided information or participated in the preparation of.
`
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 24:
`
`Identify all documents relating to the subject matter of the foregoing
`
`interrogatories and the preparation of Respondent’s responses thereto.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AKASA (EUROPE) LIMITED
`
`__/M. Scott Alprin/____________________
`Steven M. Rabin
`Hui Zhang
`M. Scott Alprin
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`RABIN & BERDO, P.C.
`Suite 500, 1101 14th Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel: (202) 371-8976
`Fax: (202) 408-0924
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Revised First
`Set of Interrogatories has been served on counsel for Respondent, Allen Xue, by e-mail,
`on March 22, 2019, at the following e-mail addresses:
`
`allen.xue@nkllaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__/M. Scott Alprin/______________
`M. Scott Alprin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site