throbber
MCKEE VOORHEES & SEASE PLC
`
`Email: Christine.lebron-dykeman@ipmvs.com
`January 25 , 2019
`
`( "“3"“ LEBRON'DVKEMAN
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEV
`LICENSED IN MASSACHUSETTS.
`CALIFORNIA. AND IOWA
`
`VIA U.S. Mail:
`
`Thomas Casa Grande
`USPTO
`Office of the Solicitor
`13.0. Box 1450
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Alexandria, VA 22313—1450
`
`Re:
`
`Trademark Registration No 4,220,169
`
`Dear Mr. Casa Grande:
`
`SOLICITQR
`'
`JAN 3 0 2019
`
`& TRADENIAHK OFFICE
`
`U.S. PATENT
`
`Enclosed please find the Certified Judgment in OTR v. WWW, Civil Action No. 2: l4—cv—
`085-LRS directing the USPTO to cancel Trademark Registration Nos. 4,220,169 and 2,652,821.
`Please let us know if you need anything else from us.
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`CHRISTINE LEBRCN—DYKEMAN
`
`CLD/mlf
`
`

`

`Case 2:14wcv-00085-LRS ECF No. 498
`
`filed 06/30/16 PagelD.13365 Page 1 of 2
`
`A0 450 (Rev. 11/11)
`
`Judgment in a Civil Action
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`for the
`
`Eastern
`
`District of Washington
`
`3G Ll C ”-0 R
`
`JAN 3 0 2M9
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`US. PATENT & TRADEMARK
`2:14-CV-085-LRS
`
`OFFICE
`
`OTR WHEEL ENGINEERING, INC.,
`
`BLACKSTONE/OTR LLC, F B T ENTERPRISES, INC.,
`Plaintiff
`v.
`WEST WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC., SAMUEL .1.
`WEST, SSL GLOBAL INC., SSL CHINA, LLC,
`
`QINGDAO STW TIRE CO LTD,
`Defendant
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
`
`The court has ordered that (check one):
`
`
`[:1 the plaintiff (name)
`recover from the
`
`defendant (name)
`the amount of
`
`
`dollars ($
`%, plus post judgment interest at the rate of
`
`), which includes prejudgment
`% per annum, along with costs.
`
`interest at the rate of
`
`[I the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
`
`recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
`
`
`
`
`Judgment for Defendants against Plaintiffs on Lanham Act trade dress infringement claim re '169 registration, Lanham
`Act trade dress infringement claim re '821 registration,
`trade secrets claim, and on claim of tortious interference with a
`contract between OTR and Genie. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is directed to cancel
`Trademark Registration Nos. 4,220,169 and 2652821.
`
`Judgment for Plaintiffs against Defendants on Lanham Act false designation of origin claim re "Outrigger” trademark
`name (Registration No. 2,288,934), Washington Consumer Protection Act claim, and on claims of tortious interference
`with a business relationship between OTR and Genie, tortious interference with a contract between Solideal and
`SuperHawk, and tortious interference with a business relationship between SuperHawk and Solideal and OTR.
`$967,015.00 in actual damages awarded in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants.
`
`
`untried Copy
`2:14-cv-85-LRS
`
`
`
`10:45 am, Jan 25, 2019
`
`@4601
`
`

`

`Case 2:14-cv-00085—LRS ECF No. 498
`
`filed 06/30/16 PagelD.13366 Page 2 of 2
`
`This action was (check one):
`
`tried by ajury with Judge
`rendered a verdict.
`
`
`Lonny R. Suko
`
`presiding, and the jury has
`
`I: tried by Judge
`was reached.
`
`
`
`without a jury and the above decision
`
`
`Summary Judgment
`on a motion for
`Lonny R. Suko
`decided by Judge
`
`Re: “Light Gray: Color Trade Dress (ECF No. 313).
`
`
`June 30, 2016
`
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`SEAN F. McAVOY
`
`
`s/Penny Lamb
`
`(By) Deputy Clerk
`
`

`

`U
`
`
`
`.om:xom.om
`
`Vw98m:32,.
`
`02‘H.2mNN<>“wingoz
`
`Hofiomom0%moooEO
`
`OHmmD
`
`
`
`
`
`Zi:‘.¢§\‘u\y‘..|illl.dmI114.me
`
`I.....I...2.:_.:.:2_.m._~2::2...:_::
`
`
`
`
`
`£556ammommfiosh
`
`m>§
`
`
`
`
`
` o:mm<mmuwmmmEdOOfimeUE
`
`>>SF<m>mZMO.—L.<.
`
`
`
`
`
`Hmhmfiomfifi<>>O_.mmZ_OEmmD.OONMmtDm.mDZm><DZéUflow
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket