Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA874899
`
`Filing date:
`
`02/02/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92057634
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Defendant
`Pak's Trading Europe B.V.
`
`MILENA S MISHEV
`KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARZ & OTTESEN LLP
`100 MATAWAN RD STE 120
`MATAWAN, NJ 07747
`UNITED STATES
`Email: mmishev@kbsolaw.com
`
`Other Motions/Papers
`
`Milena S. Mishev
`
`mmishev@kbsiplaw.com, trademark@buchalter.com
`
`/milena s. mishev/
`
`02/02/2018
`
`Respondent Reply to Petitioner Opp to Respondent Motion to Suspend Extend
`20180130 draft.pdf(54162 bytes )
`Exhibit A.pdf(652602 bytes )
`Exhibit B.pdf(480560 bytes )
`Exhibit C.pdf(2037977 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part1.pdf(4115132 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part2.pdf(3871751 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part3.pdf(4017749 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part4.pdf(3916553 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part5.pdf(1429797 bytes )
`Exhibit E.pdf(1345045 bytes )
`Y.S. Park Declaration.pdf(724734 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No.: 92057634
`
`Registration Nos. 3786964,
`
`3701449, 1377160
`
`Marks:
`
`,
`
` ,
`
`
`
`JUNKFOOD CLOTHING
`COMPANY
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAK’S TRADING EUROPE B.V.,
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`Respondent.
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO PETITIONER’S OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND AND EXTEND ALL DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondent, Pak’s Trading Europe B.V. (“Respondent”), through its attorneys, hereby
`
`submits its Reply to Petitioner’s Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Suspend and Extend All
`
`Discovery and Trial Dates, as follows:
`
`1. Respondent has been treated unethically by Petitioner’s Predecessor in rights,
`
`Junkfood Clothing Company (hereinafter “Old Junkfood”). Since the commencement of this
`
`proceeding on July 31, 2013 to about March 15, 2017 when the last consent motion for
`
`suspension was filed by Petitioner Predecessor’s, Old Junkfood, (Docket Entry No. 45),
`
`submitted hereto as Exhibit A, Respondent has been continuously tricked by Petitioner
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Predecessor’s, Old Junkfood, about Petitioner’s Predecessor’s intent to settle this case.
`
`Furthermore, Respondent’s consent to the multiple motions to suspend this cancellation
`
`proceeding has been fraudulently obtained by Petitioner’s Predecessor, Old Junkfood, by
`
`engaging in what now appears to be mock settlement negotiations. Thus, Respondent’s trust in
`
`fair business dealings in this country has been seriously devoured.
`
`2. Respondent would like to clarify that in its Motion to Suspend and Extend All
`
`Discovery and Trial Dates, Respondent did not provide characterizations of its Principal’s ability
`
`or inability to act. Responded simply laid down the chronology of events regarding its
`
`Principal’s health and supported such facts with statements made by medical doctors
`
`knowledgeable of Mr. Park’s medical condition. It is only in this Board’s discretion to interpret
`
`the facts and make a decision on how this cancellation should further proceed, based on such
`
`facts.
`
`3. In its Opposition to Respondent’s Motion, Petitioner misinterprets the facts.
`
`Petitioner accuses Respondent of not answering Petitioner’s October 19, 2017 settlement offer.
`
`In fact, on October 25, 2017, Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park expressed his willingness to
`
`personally discuss the settlement offer with Petitioner’s principal. (Exhibit B). Respondent’s
`
`invitation was bluntly declined by Petitioner.
`
`4. Furthermore, in its Opposition to Respondent’s Motion, Petitioner refers to a demand
`
`letter received by Petitioner’s Korean distributor with regard to the trademarks at issue.
`
` Respondent submits that parallel between the two jurisdictions is impractical. The Republic of
`
`Korea is a civil law country, whereas, The United States is a common law country. The two
`
`jurisdictions have a completely different structure of rules of civil procedure and, therefore,
`
`require a different level of participation by the parties to a legal conflict. (Exhibit C). Moreover,
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`the main content of the demand letter dated November 28, 2017, was prepared by Respondent’s
`
`Korean attorney and approved by Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park back in 2013. The demand
`
`letter, however, was put on hold due to the commencement of settlement negotiations between
`
`Respondent and Petitioner’s Predecessor, Old Junkfood. (Park Decl. ¶4). Although, the
`
`November 28, 2017 letter, attached hereto as Exhibit D, is in Korean, it is evident that it refers to
`
`Respondent’s protected marks and contains evidence of Petitioner’s current infringing imports to
`
`Korea.
`
`5. Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park is a graduate of the Korea University Law School,
`
`which is highly ranked amidst world-leading educational institutions – comes in 48th place
`
`amongst 300 university law schools worldwide. (Exhibit E). Mr. Park, who also holds degrees in
`
`business administration and international studies, was recently offered collegial help from the
`
`fellow alumni of the Korea University Law School who came to lend a hand in a difficult time
`
`offering to handle the matter with Petitioner’s Korean distributor at a very low preferential fee.
`
`(Park Decl. ¶5). This is the reason, why Respondent’s Korean counsel was advised that Mr. Park
`
`is handling the case himself. Id.
`
`6. Petitioner is further accusing Respondent of “distorting the ability for Respondent to
`
`participate in the proceedings, such that Respondent participates when it chooses to do so, and
`
`delays when convenient. Respondent respectfully declares that nothing in Respondent’s actions,
`
`i.e., requesting business-to-business meeting with Petitioner, initiating a trademark demand letter
`
`in Korea, or authorizing a settlement proposal, contradicts the current daring state of Respondent’s
`
`Principal Mr. Park’s health. Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park’s decision to take action is against
`
`his physician’s recommendations. Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park has been pushed to the corner
`
`by the belligerent behavior of Petitioner, Junkfood Clothing LLC, which has so far exhibited
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`complete disregard to Respondent’s rights and interests in the subject marks. For years,
`
`Respondent has been successful in its concerted efforts to police Respondent’s rights against
`
`infringing uses by many companies including, but not limited, to Nike, Kohl’s, Walmart, John
`
`Varvatos, Guru Denim dba True Religion Brand Jeans, Louis Vuitton Malletier. Despite his
`
`serious health issues, Respondent’s Principal Mr. Park is determined to continue defending
`
`Respondent’s trademark rights and interests in the marks at issue. (Park Decl. ¶6).
`
`In light of the foregoing, Respondent believes that it deserves its request for extension to
`
`the discovery and trial dates to be granted. However, Respondent is ready to defer to the Board’s
`
`judgment with regard to the appropriate dates in the proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz LLP,
`
` /Milena S. Mishev/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`_________________________
`Milena S. Mishev
`Attorneys for Respondent
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V.
`100 Matawan Road, Ste. 120
`Matawan, NJ 07747
`732.578.0103 ext. 227 (Telephone)
`732.578.0104 (Facsimile)
`mmishev@kbsiplaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS BEING FILED
`ELECTRONICALLY WITH THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE.
`
`Date: February 2, 2018
`
` /Milena S. Mishev/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Milena S. Mishev, hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of the
`foregoing REPLY TO PETITIONER’S OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION
`TO SUSPEND AND EXTEND ALL DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES to be served
`electronically on:
`
`
`
`
`
`Jessie K. Reider
`Matthew L. Seror
`Amanda T. Alameddine
`Buchalter, A Professional Corporation
`1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`trademark@buchalter.com
`
`
`on this 2nd day of February, 2018.
`
`
`
` /Milena S. Mishev/
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. httQ://estta.usgto.gov
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`ESTTA807320
`
`Filing date:
`
`03/15/201 7
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`92057634
`
`Plaintiff
`JunkFood Clothing Company
`
`J PARKs WORKMAN
`DORITY & MANNING PA
`75 BEATTIE PLACE, STE 1600
`GREENVILLE, SC 29601
`UNITED STATES
`
`pworkman@dority-manning.com, docketing@dority-manning.com,
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`nbatavia@dority-manning.com, lhensel@dority-manning.com
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of Registration No. 3786964
`
`JunkFood Clothing Company,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`Cancellation No. 92057634
`
`Reg. No. 3786964
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) Mark:
`
`) ) )
`
`v.
`
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V.,
`
`Respondent.
`
`CONSENT MOTION FOR SUSPENSION
`
`Petitioner, Junkfood Clothing Company (“Junkfood”), with the consent of Respondent,
`
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V. (“Pak’s”), moves for an additional 90-day suspension of all deadlines
`
`in this matter. Good cause exists for the suspension because the parties are actively engaged in
`
`settlement discussions and are close to reaching a final resolution. A detailed report is provided
`
`below:
`
`1.
`
`Junkfood and Pak’s are currently engaged in settlement discussions to resolve this
`
`matter and two separate proceedings, including Cancellation No. 92055779 and Opposition No.
`
`91207632, which were more recently filed.
`
`2.
`
`The settlement discussions between Junkfood and Pak’s have been complicated
`
`because of the complex nature of the various proceedings. The settlement discussions have
`
`included the discussion of numerous terms that could lead to resolution of this particular matter
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`and the additional proceedings and so that the parties can resolve complex issues concerning
`
`worldwide rights.
`
`3.
`
`Since December 2014, the parties have diligently engaged in numerous exchanges
`
`of formal draft settlement proposals resulting in the narrowing of the issues needed to be
`
`addressed. Issues that have been resolved include scope of the settlement, timelines for actions,
`
`and forum issues. Since the last extension, the parties have exchanged further edits on a draft
`
`settlement agreement and are working towards final execution of a formal, written settlement
`
`agreement. The parties hope to finalize the formal written settlement agreement to resolve this
`
`Cancellation No. 92057634 and Opposition No. 91207632 and Cancellation No.
`
`4.
`
`Thus, the parties request a 90-day suspension of proceedings so that final edits to
`
`a formal written settlement agreement can be completed.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the parties’ respectfully request that the Board grant a 90-day
`
`suspension of proceedings so that resolution of the issues can be finalized.
`
`Time to Answer :
`
`Deadline for Discovery Conference :
`
`Discovery Opens :
`
`Initial Disclosures Due :
`
`Expert Disclosures Due :
`
`Discovery Period to Close :
`
`Plaintiff Pretrial Disclosures :
`
`Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends :
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff‘s Pretrial Disclosures :
`
`30-day Trial Period for Defendant and Plaintiff in the Counterclaim :
`
`Counterclaim Defendant's and Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due :
`
`07/03/2017
`
`08/02/2017
`
`08/02/2017
`
`09/01/2017
`
`12/30/2017
`
`01/29/2017
`
`03/15/2018
`
`04/29/2018
`
`05/14/2018
`
`06/28/2018
`
`07/13/2018
`
`30-day Trial Period for Counterclaim Defendant and Rebuttal Testimony as Plaintiff Ends:
`
`08/27/2018
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Counterclaim Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due:
`
`15-day Rebuttal Period for Counterclaim Plaintiff Ends :
`
`Plaintiff‘s Trial Brief Due :
`
`Defendant's Trial Brief and Plaintiff in the Counterclaim Due :
`
`Brief for Defendant in the Counterclaim and Reply Brief, if any, for Plaintiff Due :
`
`Reply Brief, if any, for Plaintiff in the Counterclaim Due :
`
`09/11/2018
`
`10/11/2018
`
`12/10/2018
`
`01/09/2019
`
`02/08/2019
`
`02/23/2019
`
`Date: March 15, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DORITY & MANNING, P.A.
`
`/Jason A. Pittman/
`
`Jason A. Pittman
`
`J. Parks Workman
`
`DORITY & MANNING, P.A.
`PO Box 1449
`
`Greenville, SC 29602
`Phone: 864-271-1592
`
`Fax: 864-335-0127
`
`jpittman@doriQZ-manning.com
`jworkman@dority-manning.com
`Attorneys for Opposer
`Junkfood Clothing Company
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 15, 2017 I served a true and complete copy of the foregoing
`
`CONSENT MOTION FOR SUSPENSION on opposing counsel Via First Class Mail, postage
`
`prepaid as follows:
`
`Milena S. Mishev
`
`Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz, & Ottesen, LLP
`Metropark South
`100 Matawan Road, Suite 120
`
`Matawan, NJ 07747
`
`/Jason A. Pittman/
`
`Jason A. Pittman
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Milena Mishev
`
`
`From:
`
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Dear Jessie,
`
`Milena Mishev
`
`Wednesday, October 25, 2017 1:46 PM
`'Reider, Jessie K.‘
`Alameddine, Amanda
`
`RE: Settlement (Pak's Trading ./. Junkfood Clothing) [IWOV-BN.FID2365985]
`
`The CEO of Pak’s Trading, Dr. Y.S. Park, has advised that he would like to get in touch with the CEO ofJunkfood Clothing
`
`LLC to discuss in person the general terms of the settlement agreement.
`
`Could you please provide to me the name and contact information of the new Junkfood’s CEO so that I may pass it on to
`
`my client.
`
`Thank you.
`
`Milena S. Mishev"
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP
`
`MetroPark South | 100 Matawan Road, Ste 120 | Matawan, NJ 07747
`www.kbsiglaw.com
`
`mmishev kbsi
`|aw.com | Skype: milena.mishev1
`732—578—0103 ext. 227 (voice)
`917-348—1735 (mobile)
`732678—0104 (fax)
`
`NEW YORK OFFICE:
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP
`600 Third Avenue, 2nd Floor
`New York, New York 10016
`
`This e-mail message and any documents accompanying it contain information that belongs to Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP,
`and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individua|(s) or entity(ies) named
`above.
`If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action
`in reliance on the contents of this message and/or accompanying documents is strictly prohibited.
`If you have received this e-mail
`message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at +1-732-578-0103.
`
`*Milena S. Mishev is admitted to the New York Bar ONLY
`
`From: Reider, Jessie K. [mailto:jreider@buchalter.com]
`Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:19 PM
`
`To: Milena Mishev <mmishev@kbsiplaw.com>; Reider, Jessie K. <jreider@buchalter.com>
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`7- » I
`
`»
`
`7-
`
`I » Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law
`
`Difference Between Common Law and Civil
`Lavv
`
`—2.;Iz_.Is: ‘13,.12Ji'3 -
`
`by Farham ' 6 miw res;
`
`00¢®®®0
`
`' FASTEFleTERN
`W
`
`When one looks into the legal systems prevalent in
`
`the world, one may come across many legal systems,
`
`practiced in various countries, which bear their roots
`
`from the legal systems practiced in the European
`
`continent. Though all
`
`legal systems have the same
`
`.- purpose of regulating and harmonizing the human
`
`OVER 99.9% NETWO
`
`”fig?
`
`_
`
`2.
`
`action within their respective societies, these legal
`.
`..
`,.
`.
`.
`.
`, systems are all driven towards certain fundamental
`likenesses and differences in their lawful frameworks. Most countries today follow one of the two
`most prominent legal systems: common law or civil
`law. The common law system developed in
`
`England amid the middle ages and was applied to the former British colonies across the world. And
`
`the civil law system created in Europe was applied in the colonies of European imperial powers such
`
`as Spain and Portugal.
`
`There are also some countries in which the civil law and the common law have been working together
`
`in what might be known as a “mixed jurisdiction," like in Sri Lanka, Quebec, Scotland and South Africa.
`
`This article tries to explain these two systems and to distinguish the fundamental difference between
`
`common law and civil law based on their methods of thought and attitudes towards the law as a legal
`syste m.
`
`The source of law remains the main source of difference between common law and civil law. Even
`
`though common law frameworks make reference to statute law, case law or judicial precedents
`
`remain to be the most important source of law, which givesjudges a dynamic part in creating rules. In
`
`civil
`
`law system, extensive reference is made to codes and statutes that are designed to cover all
`
`eventualities, and thejudges tend to have a much-limited role to play in terms of applying the codified
`
`law to particular situations. Thus precedents of case laws would only be used as mere guidelines.
`
`Accordingly, when cases are heard under the civil
`
`law legal systems, the judges act simply as
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law—and-ciViI—law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law I Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 2 of 7
`
`investigators, while in common-law systems, the judges seem to hold a more prominent role by
`
`acting as arbitrators between the two conflicting parties.
`
`COMMON LAW
`VERSUS
`
`CIVIL LAW
`
`Common law is not
`codified
`
`Civil law is a codified
`set of laws
`
`Judicial precedents
`are binding
`
`Iudicial precedents
`are not binding
`
`
`
`Iudges make rulings,
`set precedent, and
`moderate between
`the conflicting
`parties
`
`Iudge’s role is to
`establish the facts of
`the case and to apply
`the provisions of the
`applicable code
`
`Main source is
`
`judicial precedents
`or case law
`
`Statutes and other
`
`subsidiary
`legislations are the
`main sources
`
`An adversarial
`system
`
`An inquisitorial
`system
`
`lP’eda'tmcom
`
`,,
`
`\
`
`.-.rl,.,i,,:,.
`
`i.“
`
`Common law is largely uncodified. This implies that there is no complete compilation of legal
`
`principles and statutes. Thus a common law system is less prescriptive than a civil law system. While
`
`common law relies on few statutes, which are a result of the decisions of the legislative authority, it is
`
`extensively based on precedents or the judicial decisions made in comparable cases — generally the
`
`decisions of higher courts, which entrust thejudges of the common law system with enormous role in
`
`shaping the law. For instance, the elements expected to demonstrate the crime of homicide are
`
`contained in the case law, as opposed to the law characterized by statute. To ensure uniformity,
`
`courts follow the precedents set by higher courts in cases dealing with similar matters.
`
`http ://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law-and-civil-law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 16... Page 3 of 7
`
`These precedents are recorded and are documented as case laws through yearbooks, and legal
`
`reports. Common law functions as an adversarial system where the judge acts as a moderator
`
`between the two conflicting parties.
`
`Common law systems can be seen in the previous English colonies such as Australia, India, Sri Lanka,
`
`Canada and the United States. Common law lawyers claim that their system is more flexible since it
`
`can adjust to circumstances without any legislative interference.
`
`
`
`law is codified and has its origin in the
`The civil
`Roman Law. Countries with civil
`law frameworks
`
`have a wide-ranging and a constantly updated legal
`
`principles that encompass all matters fit for being
`
`brought before a court — the relevant procedures,
`
`and the fitting punishment for every offense. Such
`
`Combine PDF Files (Free)
`law:
`of
`classes
`distinctive
`recognize
`codes
`Streamline YourDocumems
`substantive law builds up which acts are liable to
`criminal or civil prosecution; the procedural
`law a» 23:?ch{31/ ngvynllagalhcfigiiime
`lays down the rules for determining if a specific
`
`activity constitutes a criminal act, while the penal
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between-common—law—and—ciViI-law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 4 of 7
`
`code specifies the punishments and penalties for certain acts. In a civil law system, the judge's part is
`
`to build up the facts of the case and to apply the statute law, thus making legislative enactments
`
`binding. Although a judge brings the formal charges, investigates the matter, and provided the verdict
`
`on the case, he or she functions within a framework of codified and structured legal rules and
`
`principles. Thus it could be stated that thejudge's role in shaping the law choice is subsequently less
`
`significant in the civil law systems, compared to the legislators and the legal jurists who have the
`
`authority to draft and interpret the codes.
`
`Countries which were former French, Dutch, German, Spanish or Portuguese colonies, including much
`
`of Central and South America and most of the Central and Eastern European and East Asian countries
`
`law structure. A civil
`also follow a civil
`common law framework.
`
`law framework is by and large more prescriptive than a
`
`Legal personalities in civil-law jurisdictions believe that their system is more steady and reasonable
`
`than common-law systems since the laws are expressed explicitly and are easier to determine in civil
`
`jurisdictions.
`
`
`
`
`
`Common Law: Common law is not codified.
`
`Civil Law: Civil law is a codified set of laws.
`
`judicial Decisions
`
`Common Law: Thejudicial precedents are binding.
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law—and-civil-law/
`
`1/18/201 8
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, le... Page 5 of 7
`
`Civil Law:Judicial precedents are not considered to be binding.
`
`Common Law: Thejudges make rulings, set precedent and moderate between the conflicting parties.
`
`Civil Law: The judge's role is to establish the facts of the case and to apply the provisions of the
`
`applicable code.
`
`Common Law: The main source isjudicial precedents or case law.
`
`Civil Law: Statutes and other subsidiary legislations are the main sources.
`
`Court Practice
`
`Common Law: The court practice is an adversarial system.
`
`Civil Law: The court practice is an inquisitorial system.
`
`Reference:
`
`Key Features of Common Law or Civil Law Systems. (/7. 01). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`What is the difference between common and civil law? (20 73). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`image Courtesy:
`
`”Statua iustitiae” By Deva/ Kuishrestha — File: 7 660 b/k 79329 zoom.png
`
`.
`
`via
`
`”Law3" By Rifqijam/i — Own work
`
`via ,
`
`00©®©®0
`
`
`
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference—between—common—law-and-civil-law/
`
`1/1 8/2018
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT D
`
`

`

`SEOCHO R0. BOX 437
`Dongwon 1&3 Building
`so MabangwRo, Seocho-Ku
`Seoul 06775, Korea
`
`~ I‘
`-
`.-—
`—-- Pg: ~33 -¥ g.
`4"
`4%) l
`7|: "9 J
`%
`F I RSTL AW I N TE RN AT ION AL
`
`TEL : (112)589-2410
`FAX : (02)589-2422
`Mail@FL-international.€0.10-
`
`201711 11% 28%
`
`
`
`4»
`
`r2.
`
`: 1:94—5:14 %%J°fl£<>1m
`
`1411:1014 21/1131
`
`*1? 7&2}? 05%?4112 617, 13%— (@**J%, WEE)
`
`1% fl :
`
`flléulifll‘fifixklflri 11-13%}130341 (02—589—0051), ZEE‘EE
`
`Hé A131? 121113 60, 18% (91%, %—11o11£21fi1 1111a)
`
`[HHUMfi 2,1121ng 9%; wow: 52101111 6112101)
`
`141301211110341
`
`L1]‘§%E Cgéuloa $1731} 1432 %€fl%EIE-%H:L 6]
`
`21] g : 2519111 #1153901 141% 53”“ 91%
`
`L
`
`—;
`
`Hg %‘%1 BIEOHOISP “t‘a*’L|‘1|”0|EF Efl-«IEHE’J
`
`491101?! 13133194 33.51402 L1]%%E ‘fi‘j‘fl EWUMZL (HEM
`fl
`104931-2— 310} % ”‘1’“‘9- E43145}.
`
`2.
`
`‘él'éli—E— 31%(431%1ET I1|251ET) %% X17§*J%9_E 3% 317191 %% {5.3% %—Er"&
`
`E0 %§?flfli}fih1dr(§¥ 1:
`
`7—1 $*E%%%i?—,
`
`3%.”?— 22 7—.L ”SE—“SE1
`
`40—1022231
`
`(2014. 2. 12.)
`
`
`
`
`'1' EM Elf-”1‘1“”!
`
`
`
`.15”
`
`401103884
`
`(2015. 5. 6.)
`
`18, 25, 28$.-
`
`R
`
`c
`
`EC<
`
`-
`E
`
`”Mann
`
`HI 3134m1032250§m1 2H5101
`LHEEQG'HEE WEBFEIBE gait
`Mamaam$aflaaa
`
`

`

`
`
`GHH afl/‘Jfl E01 E*% (i) 2W
`
`%a1o1firg%,
`
`(111 2111 11—111 Eflfi-‘Efl 2:1
`
`71331175126ii) 2‘?L4 SSGBHE},%41
`
`_
`0 2:115 $11111:
`
`lg— 747‘ a-ammoga—
`
`E511 0] 2121??0E 911%] Tor/‘1? EEG] ENE @4755, E4113 QEC
`! U
`351311012] E0115 0] *Hfl
`
`“0| *P’d i'éHI‘ll-‘EWIEP ELIEDE EUHEHlM01°
`
`Oil's
`
`"E-
`
`$139135] 11/1163 751” A1~ga11 91%;—L1c1cc.(xm 3:1 glam :15 115:1).
`
`fimixgiooog
`
`
`
`
`
`SHAH} c131~31 53334;: $119194
`
`fiqq 0211 £011130191 15—?
`
`01 52: $1161 221%011 21%»315—:
`”gfi‘rfi$01] :q-E} CHM—L: BEL/LowOW
`
`SII
`
`Huey— uga 32-111 211211 91x14 x1301 $322+: E6101 E A10M E1361 EH
`
`;1
`
`a1
`
`H 1111011711 q~3— A1313? 01621311
`
`€331
`
`';e<<
`
`2/3
`
`:‘r‘nthm
`
`

`

`,_....
`_
`.
`-
`._
`-
`4-
`i315~ [£13 3:353:3‘: 15 335$},W
`'.
`.V
`u-m....-.--..
`7.4-
`‘
`. _"
`x ' .“ .i.“..‘ .
`'..
`A
`'
`...._7_..--m _..
`__
`ESE-1:.
`
`or. o] 421 534133} 7%}? $37} EA]% 0] *in @‘EgHXfl%9J $11711},
`
`31}
`
`swag,
`
`¢TL_UHT§L°J.J% @4119;
`
`3“:
`
`949101174]
`
`“38% $fl/‘1i
`
`a}. 3&2; 1%wm17} Max] egg: 01 2+3 LEé/‘JEEF 9m} fir:- 2+
`
`4%}21 %fi1fl% $42194 Ema—:— zwaoa 2:42:10
`
`gram.
`
`a}. 447421 2&2;
`
`flaw—$324011 m6} €217;
`
`€321;— $4611 mm 9,235 WM 255
`
`fililcd% zlfiékfi $93694 WFJE’MWI
`
`‘QEIIEF’ENE.
`
`6.
`
`’EW 13’89194 3%01] EHE‘W 20176 12% 8????7‘1 $1494 fl7é1'% OaLIfiEF/‘W HEW,
`1
`13—7301 Qfiw 94%)] $513“?! @fil—EZT‘fi/‘cfi, 91%?“4171 fifiqfi}.
`xi" ,
`A
`“
`\y.._:_k\ji;3:‘l
`
`
`
`(-nr-nr.
`
`

`

`2017-11w27
`
`[fl L9
`
`101'
`
`40amr:[Q[EE
`
`4H-IH05021-I>m9
`
`-IH (15 J-lJ
`
`
`
`olnOHOHJHIII-Jl:JIII}![E[52[mlollllflfi"IIJEu: my
`
`20121—3 09% 24%
`
`201241060046
`
`201251 09% 04%
`
`:10 M Jlfll iii
`
`if
`
`Fn‘ 23
`
`20131;:1 11% 2602'
`
`2013701 10726
`
`r52 rm ["0
`
`20145 02% 05%
`
`20145 02% 12%
`
`”a
`
`1%
`
`mmfi
`Q!
`”2494-55420
`3oztnm w12
`HIEma- oa09 am Jlfll
`(J
`
`9
`[I]
`
`is;
`
`http://www.patentgo.kr/}sp/ka/oncert/recvdoc/ViewRechoc.so
`
`1/1
`
`

`

`2017-11-27
`
`ma6
`
`%ma:54|3GO05fl44DNU22
`
`E§§11
`
`AI1::
`
`gm
`
`01E
`
`2015-0005284
`
`2015b=| 04% 10%
`
`VINCISTAR
`
`010105.020914
`
`g
`
`3&3?»“¢finoNa“aNox:wN
`
`Q_§
`
`2025BI 05% 0
`
`I
`'72
`
`j
`
`2%13
`%%&Im
`
`,m%,
`
`@Efiwg
`
`§-%§§
`
`1UL1):
`
`mwx&m
`
`§.ém£
`
`gamjm
`
`FA
`
`EEME]
`(fléflafl)
`
`:1m
`
`HO
`
`635 . 000
`
`3
`
`234
`
`.E’.Ea22
`
`Eli-fill 6
`
`http://www.patentgo.kr/jsp/ka/oncert/recvdoc/ViewRechoc.so
`
`l/l
`
`
`
`

`

`§E§% 35.
`OH
`
`40-2013-01 10726
`
`um)m::::a%mm
`
`(260) {17:71:
`
`40—2013—0110726
`
`(442) 11:27}
`
`201313119:26%1
`
`%E%:
`25(10%)
`40—2012—0060046
`20121109fi24‘11
`
`20121730971047;
`
`$r%1%3'15§(EP0)
`
`:1 3‘7.
`<11 71
`731% 701
`01115978.?
`in
`0]1-
`:11
`
`(300)
`
`{731)
`
`G
`
`4.0[1111'1111r1mr£$flw
`
`l:|
`
`(511)
`(210)
`(220)
`
`£11131é.“¢ ‘21
`
`11171: 7&7} 71:01
`
`1,1101
`
`a1): éjéu101 7411:EH- 0 1432 EQLIHEJE'QHZ 6
`
`(740) 7117191
`
`(511) 717§é1§/71:1¢g/g+!
`
`111125 157':
`
`7:: 7177. 7117171
`77‘ 7711771771
`MHIE/‘1
`:5 1111- 71 71: 7117117 717:. 77171.
`717171 :71 951 711171717 171171.
`£313 . 5711-);
`91737-87 2&1}.
`
`EINE.
`
`fi-E'EL.
`
`417:: 711:1 7:1:
`
`:11:
`
`77:23:
`
`'77-111112511111;
`
`
`
`

`

`’3 E i 3. 2- ].
`
`40-2015-0005284
`
`(260) 131111
`Ma)%111
`
`40-2015-0005284
`
`ZOISEOIQ 19%
`
`G (190)E11§}‘3151L%3V§(KR)
`
`~
`(511) 11
`r._.—|
`(210 ) 119 113:
`9%)11111
`(300) T1514'7
`1—21}
`
`1111
`18(101) 28(101) 25(101}
`40-2014—0003638
`mmflmama
`
`1272309 201311071231
`wm111°1
`
`111111.}; 11-11, 9111
`
`11.111111 115111111. 2—1 111°]
`
`111E¢1¢11 1111112111111:
`(740) EHE191
`
`6
`
`111131751191
`:1
`11111: 111
`
`(511) XI’S’éF‘E/I‘v‘ ”J45 3/112
`
`118%
`
`.1111111,111111
`111 1111 1111.11.111 :11 111-11.11 1
`111o111.111
`1.1-1111 11111 1111111,111
`15.1111
`:1]
`1111 11 111111111 111111111
`
`112
`
`11,11 11
`
`w
`
`#-
`
`.:
`
`f
`
`r‘
`
`.11111111.11t“11211111111111-1121D.11_
`119
`zer
`
`1111111
`
`11111111111111
`
`11.1111111.1
`
`

`

`’B’LEEiE
`
`QE é % 43 l]
`
`40-2015-0005284
`
`
`
`VINCISTAR
`
`

`

`2017- 11- 27-
`
`§3$5g MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`m“ . ¢.n...,.....(.m ”nu-am "mm “NM-.1 .r _¢.
`
`we LOVE: JUNKIOOD mm W}m
`
`JUNK F090
`
`HOME > man > EFBEIME
`
`MN S/s TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`Emma : mac _, 62,100E
`Ema: 124034
`243m : my?
`5.x}: JUNK FOOD
`EEJ'E: JUNK FOOD [149:in
`inSM‘iw'
`
`
`
`-
`
`A]!!!
`
`alt!
`
`fr‘H \
`
`2. A“)
`
`4. max}
`
`6, Maw 52 él
`a” $9M?
`a. §§E§7IE
`
`gfg-gwmgg 31‘
`
`.
`,,
`elzwmea 3M
`’ela‘E-Bwl’éiré EM
`
`{2-3-3me EJI
`
`gamma EDI
`
`gamma EJI
`
`‘
`
`1‘
`
`“
`
`‘
`
`
`
`1'11.
`[:1 ¥Eflfl駣i
`
`E53?
`@031
`
`121 ”3.133%
`
`$ng “W" ' ="‘-‘
`
`1. Iflfi-ifli
`
`3. fl?
`
`5. M‘Efi
`1 H‘Efi’fi
`9. AIS SWINE} ’3
`twig;
`
`
`: 201?—04—01
`
`
`
`‘ 3
`
`3-15-5519939 UH LM1W 919% 11%;; “iii. lilfig-fi, £312. ‘33 EIELL DCF-lzlli
`9! 30017Hil*}21' ENI’flJfiI ili’g‘o‘m ERR-J E'JEIJI JEI'IEI Emil fliolfl Rifil—M.
`“HP-b 115. EEIELI ANNA. EilliiOl EFL IilE/“I it. {WEE 5 HEWE fiEliulW AH; :.24"— 91251
`EMIHIEEE 4150001 PEI-9| £3010}! ‘EI’SEIO‘I ‘1'7IEMI {*aflé‘Ea'I—ICL
`
`S / S CREW NECK T-SHIRT
`
`hnp:lljunkfoodshop.com!shoplgoodslgoods_view.php?&good5no=852&category=002002
`
`1i?
`
`

`

`2017-11-2?
`
`gags—5*; MN 5/5 TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSRO13PE)
`
`— DETAIL —
`
`[Ianru
`
`uaurmu
`
`http:/I‘junkfoodshop.comlshoplgoodslgoodsmviewphpmgoodsno=852&category=002002
`
`2/7
`
`

`

`2017- 11- 27-
`
`Kai-.fi-Efif MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`
`
`[Graphic - NASA]
`
`
`
`hflp:lljunkfoodshop.comlshopigoadsigoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=002602
`
`3!”?
`
`

`

`2017- 11- 27-
`
`Jag—Iggg MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`MERCURV
`
`http:lljunkfoodshop.comlshoplgoods/goodsflview.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`4f?
`
`

`

`I
`
`2017.11.27.
`
`§3¥E§ MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`
`
`as N“? ii
`- 2'! 3111* HEIEI 3321 SF! WEI-E Igé‘ifll’ 5'30! “til 'BEI 51%| 4‘ 913L151.
`
`'- INFORMATION ‘-
`
`w gig karat era—E’wmgm an
`— KIWIFEAjgioI 3:MW Emma. (m #- uag 2:01 we &)
`. em 5% haul? mama wow mama)
`
`~ MI : Cotton 100%
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`— 194g!
`
`: PEPPER
`
`- Madein U.S.A
`
`— wamwm : (2%ngch
`
`“ Nlififi 1201 7.4.
`
`~ %2 2% 71% : 4m a 24 M21 «Egan: won urg-
`
`— A/swxr aw: : (¢>%amlmnz 023452—3430
`
`- SIZE '—
`
`
`6) 4.54% *I'OIE ©
`SIZE
`71—39%
`S
`50
`M
`52
`1.
`54
`
`3'3 01
`20
`21
`21.5
`
`303031?!
`17
`'18
`18
`
`017J1I§01
`12
`12
`12.5
`
`40153424 : cm
`-%71%;'”
`7!
`73
`74
`
`- 3213942; Jag xggfil ma} l-ZIméiEQIQiP11’i'H—5‘ 9-? eleq,
`
`M ELIHQE Hat—‘5': PC $.1-2if'il'ltal23151131017191'32‘4: “I (-‘rLIEt‘
`
`httpfljunkfoodshop.com/shoplgoodsfgoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`51'?
`
`

`

`1
`
`2017.11. 27.
`
`35:1 513,55"; MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMMITSROISPE)
`
`SHIPPING GUIDE
`
`
`I> “III“:‘E‘ELILH
`- RENE: i EIflE—IIHII
`" HH$7I7I=EQI+IEI331§§ ‘L‘é’flfifli 11-49301 j‘filr'fifl-IEI
`(EL 7135-? EMT-I»."-DIEI ”7.4% I$22501 JIE-II'II #0IfiI—IEH
`“ BIII‘EZI‘E- Iii IBI.{‘_'?_*.21I °"“1I‘3.:II‘IIiEIHPHJI-HT ‘L‘Ifil—IEIJ
`
`- RE 3331' 'flé'r-E WI?! 5E: E’WEIE Efl ’ééfil =7—‘A10IfILIEi.
`- fi-E‘EIZIE MEI? fl’ifi’w'flfi‘flfi'. I'IIUIE I ”I? WEI-E}? El 33-?— maul-3E IZ’IH’I‘W #93! 4410f III-IEI.
`@E 3-9” 503111-3 WWW ‘33012 SEW E‘EflEIIHII EEK-E ELfl‘flIE 5101.
`EI EM OPEN 1‘!3? WII E 15 3%HI 2.500%!8I Hfikfi ”Ea-RI EI’I‘I 241w? ELIEIJ
`
`[> “JEN fiQII’IIE’
`-II: EI'(Iag)1R7IE ”as: $33:I.JI: 2% rIITFIIIIIIIIEI +£15.50IIII‘I;oII:IaI:0IoIaIiI-¢III:ILIEI.
`- III: w MIMI: III;MIMI:_ MI?-Itl E «z—ganI EIIWI HI‘EILIEI
`
`D 11%” 51% flail
`- flaw IIIEI III-HI my I '1'" 11¢:‘ 3%:ng am: 7|7I| II 3:34 III: Hm iIIIEIIIIusss9938M
`LIIIIII #JPI uFILIEI.
`- “$345?- :I=I-.+. [HIM-‘3‘” as; a:a 77-. aware: 13% (#IEEIGIIE‘LTIEI I
`u 2;: [A1&*:?:AI%IH? gm: m7. I3: (#IE'flDIIE‘EIJEII as: EIJOI'fi'aI I
`
`
`
`
`Egg Iitll’fli‘J umm
`
`
`
`"l‘l’
`
`MN TEE_JDE COOL '
`[‘1II’__’=I75I9EI ’33-:M “ MN TELBATMAN
`MN TEE_BATMAN
`MN SIS TELJEAN-MICHEL
`LIVING IT
`EIMU%AIIE:¥- MN:
`YOU COMPLETE
`BASOUIATIJFMJ2TSRO12NVI HEHOIJFMJITSRGOEBK)
`UP(JFMJ2TSROO4WH)
`E_BATMAN.
`MEUFMJETSROOEWH)
`CAM
`MIZT
`)
`58,500-fl
`58500-3
`53.500a
`.
`53 sou-a
`..
`.
`.
`.....
`.
`..
`-I I .II n:
`-nm .. 35-40“
`-m- --u n-
`I
`-
`. an m
`“mEquIvI-II
`it
`
`HII§HI17I%HH§E—:—2,5UOE NLIISI. IEMfilLEEII ‘iJ—E‘JIBE HHEHI7I¥ 7W* RigIEI) 50.00% DIE! $19M $33H%EI4
`' CI.
`-
`E‘— g‘eEEI filth? %l%§I°|$2— 4°40! iEEILIEI HIE:filEsIZI'ESIQJ Esr- ENE OdifiAIEE siIgl-a-Il EEIafiIfil—IEI.
`:1: HI%%E1~3?_I?:'I-IEI. (“a éIILI III 9.1x! :In-QI é? CIi :m: #w
`ISL-IEI.[IIII§DII7§?._I% :AIEI-IIEaIIIuI III: III-IF—
`' IIoI QfiéIEi III] IIHée'IQflIE KIOIJI My:- $3.4m. ]
`1-:— géEEI E3141 tIIlzs‘J‘ Ifié E 2 39' gabltl HHS— FI-EQDIEIE :éE-EEFE SItI IEHIEIIII 3% HEI50|7I=EI7I1I§r EIEIIEILIEI.
`"(301% 1' “IS-WEE JII’JHHEM II|9|quI 3.1% ¥EHE 7:??? 313134 71’: EILIEH
`
`M a! HEEILI Havana: I: 5:71“:
`‘éII-IEII.
`”3&- EVE-Fiji JI'SJ'P‘I§ ’éI-E- 4-3SE $EI 7‘5 OILII
`- 43-}??? EiIItacIIIIII’I“E ”SHIE9 éIfi- 7|I*I Wé *IOIIE °J OILIIEIE IIIEI 35 ELI-EDI EJIé-EILIEI.
`EE-
`317:“ HBEIOII P—IEI PLEI. ”Ia— IRWIN HHé‘sHIE $EI‘5IAWI ELIEIIII|2§RI SIXIfiHESI-‘TIE IE‘ilfllI
`. IICIJ'ID“E 941— Z“...I“
`,Elf
`- 9.4“ ’éI-EE t'EEiJ 'EI‘II, ¥§7
`% IEIIE’EM MERE JIZIOI ”dgfi' # RIGl—IEI.
`-