Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA607213
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`05/30/2014
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92056888
`Plaintiff
`Isaac A. Potter Jr.
`ISAAC A POTTER JR
`5503 S TAMPA AVENUE
`ORLANDO, FL 32839
`UNITED STATES
`ipotter2000@yahoo.com
`Other Motions/Papers
`Isaac/A/Potter/Jr
`ipotter2000@yahoo.com
`Isaac/A/Potter/Jr
`05/30/2014
`Friday.pdf(2261895 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
`
`VIRGINIA (ALEXANDRIA DIVISION)
`
`AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`CASE NO: 1:13—CV—01417—CMH-IDD
`
`CASE NO. 14-1505 CAFC
`
`DATE: 5/30/2014
`
`CASE NO: 14-1379
`
`ISAAC A. POTTER JR.,
`
`CASE NO: 14-1445
`
`PLAINITIFF,
`
`CASE NO: 14-1036
`
`V.
`
`ROBERTA S. BREN et a1,
`
`TERESA STANEK REA et a1,
`
`OBLON SPIVAK et al,
`
`LINDA M. KING et al,
`
`DEFENDANTS,
`
`MEMORANDUM OF LAW
`
`NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION CHALLENGE TO
`
`JURISDICTION FOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (ALEXANDRIA DIVISION). RULE 5.1
`
`CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO STATUE (C) INTERVENTION; FINAL
`
`DECISION ON THE MERITS. CASE NO. 1:13—CV—01417-CMH-IDD.
`
`5/30/WI
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`05/30/2014 THE foregoing document was served on all parties
`
`or their counsel of record of Amended Notice of Appeal,
`
`Complaint for the United States Court of Federal Claims,
`
`Memorandum of Law by serving true copy at the address listed
`
`below:
`
`1. DANIEL E. O’TOOLE— CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
`
`THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 717 MADISON PLACE, N.W. (ROOM 401),
`
`WASHINGTON, DC 20439 PHONE—202—275—8000
`
`Notice@cafc.uscourts.goV
`
`2. Clerk, Fernando Galindo, Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse,
`
`Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division, 401
`
`Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`3. RONALD C. MACHEN JR., United States Attomey’s
`Office, 555 4th street, N.W.,
`
`Washington, DC 20530 (202-252-7566)
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 1:13—cV—01417—CMH—IDD Document 59 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID#
`409
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`NOTICE OF DOCKETING
`
`14-1505 - Potter v. Bren
`
`Date of docketing: May 29, 2014
`
`Appeal from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia case no. 1:13-cv-01417-
`
`CMH—lDD
`
`Appellant(s): Isaac A. Potter
`
`Critical dates include:
`
`- Date of docketing. See Fed. Cir. R. 12.
`
`- Entry of appearance. (Due within 14 days of the date of docketing.) See Fed. Cir. R. 47.3.
`
`- Certificate of interest. (Due within 14 days of the date of docketing.) See Fed. Cir. R. 47.4.
`
`- Docketing Statement. (Due within 14 days of the date of docketing, or within 30 days if the United States
`
`or_ its officer or agency is a party in the appeal.) [Only in cases where all parties are represented by
`
`counsel. See the en banc order dated September 18, 2006, and guidelines available at
`
`www.cafc.uscourts.gov.]
`
`- Requests for extensions of time. See Fed. Cir. R. 26 and 27. N.B. Delayed requests are not favored
`
`by the court.
`
`- Briefs. See Fed. Cir. R. 31. N.B. You will not receive a separate briefing schedule from the Clerk's
`
`Office. However, in a case involving an appellant, a cross-appellant, and an appellee, a special briefing
`
`schedule is used. The appellant's opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of docketing. The cross-
`
`appellant's opening brief is due within 40 days of filing of the appellant's opening brief. The appe||ee‘s
`
`brief is due within 40 days of filing of the cross-appellant's brief. The appellant's response/reply brief is
`
`due within 40 days of filing of the appe||ee's brief. The cross-appellant's reply brief is due within 14 days
`
`of filing of the appellant's response/reply brief. The joint appendix is due within 10 days of filing of the
`
`cross-appellant's reply brief.
`
`e§;i§if/M
`
`ti
`
`

`
`- Settlement discussions. See Fed. Cir. R. 33.
`
`- Oral Argument Schedule Conflicts: Counsel can expect oral argument to be set within 2 months of
`
`the filing of final brief or appendix in a case. Counsel should advise the clerk's office of any potential
`
`conflict that would interfere with counsel's ability to appear for oral argument, and counsel should provide
`
`updates to inform the clerk's office of any potential conflict as it arises. The clerk's office will make every
`
`effort to accommodate counsel's conflicts if counsel so advises the clerk's office prior to the time that the
`
`clerk's office sets the date for oral argument. After the date for oral argument is set, however, the date for
`
`oral argument will not be postponed except on motion showing compelling circumstances. Counsel
`
`should be aware that the court's future oral argument schedule is posted on the court's website at
`
`www.cafc.uscourts.gov under the oral argument tab.
`
`Pro se parties should refer to the Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants.
`
`Attachments:
`
`- Official caption is reflected on the Electronic Docket in CM/ECF
`
`- Rules of Practice (to pro se parties only)
`
`- Required forms (to pro se parties only): o Entry of Appearance
`
`o Informal Brief
`
`0 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in Forrna Pauperis (only to appellants owing the docketing
`
`fee)
`
`Counsel may download the Rules of Practice and required forms from www.cafc.uscourts.gov.
`
`Daniel E. O'Toole Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`

`
`LETTER OF PROTEST TO THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF
`
`THE USPTO/ TTAB FOR THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS:
`
`DEFENDANTS DEADLINE FOR RENEWAL DATE
`
`05/20/2014 WITHOUT FILING A PETITION TO THE
`
`DIRECTOR WITH FEES DURING A PENDING
`
`LITIGATION FOR CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION
`
`NO. 3431651(FRAUD IN EXECUTION).
`
`(2) A third party notifies the USPTO of the existence of a federally registered mark or
`prior-pending application and alleges that there is a likelihood of confusion between this
`mark and the mark in the application that is the subject of the letter of protest.
`If the
`letter of protest is accepted, the examining attorney is notified that an objection to the
`registration of the mark has been made on the ground of an alleged likelihood of
`confusion with a registered mark or prior pending application, and is referred to the
`registration or application information as it appears in the automated records of the
`USPTO.
`
`(3) A third party files a request that prosecution of an application be suspended because
`of pending litigation claiming infringement based on the applicant’s use of the applied-
`for mark. The litigation must be specifically identified and a copy of the relevant
`pleadings must be enclosed. The litigation must involve a federally registered mark or
`prior pending application of the protestor, and the protestor must allege that there is a
`likelihood of confusion between this mark and the mark in the application that is the
`subject of the letter of protest. Normally, a court proceeding is not considered relevant
`to the registrability of a mark unless the remedy requested in the proceeding is
`cancellation, abandonment, or amendment of the application that is the subject of the
`letter of protest.
`If the letter of protest is accepted, the examining attorney is informed
`that a request for suspension has been received based on an alleged likelihood of
`confusion with a registered mark or prior pending application that is the subject of
`pending litigation. Copies of the relevant pleadings are placed in the record.
`
`(4) A third party notifies the USPTO that registered marks are being used
`inappropriately in identifications of goods and services for particular applications. (See
`
`TMEP §1402.09.)
`
`(5) A third party notifies the USPTO of the existence of a subsequently filed U.S.
`application and alleges that the application contains a proper claim of priority under
`§44(d) to which the third party is entitled and that there is a likelihood of confusion
`between its mark and the mark in a prior-filed application that is the subject of the letter
`of protest. See TMEP §§1003.05 and 1904.01(e).
`
`3/30/M
`
`

`
`.
`
`.
`
`(6) A third party notifies the USPTO of the existence of an application filed under §66(a)
`with an earlier filing date or a priority claim to which the third party is entitled and that
`there is a likelihood of confusion between its mark and the mark in the application that is
`
`the subject of the letter of protest, and the §66(a) application may not have been
`entered into the USPTO database at the time the application that is the subject of the
`letter of protest was examined. See TMEP §§1904.01(b) and 1904.01(e).
`
`(7) A third party notifies the USPTO that the foreign application relied upon as the basis
`for a claim of priority under §44(d) is not the first application filed in a treaty country and
`provides evidence of the existence of an earlier-filed foreign registration or pending
`foreign application. See TMEP §1003.01.
`
`QSPTQ > Trgemark > TSDR > Trademark Search
`
`TSDR F.l'«Q'S
`
`Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR)0
`
`E Search
`
`Q<J/ea//M
`
`5/3”//91
`
`

`
`'
`
`'«
`
`'
`
`, Case 1213-CV—U1417-CMH-IDD Document 30-1 Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 OT 1 PageID# 265
`
`FlECiEl""D
`ft’-A5I..'3‘nf)-3.‘-.il
`
`
`
`EJES1
`8.
`Ni‘.
`‘'-‘.}I\
`
`RVJT COURT
`VlFl3lNlA
`
`
`
`
`
`CLEFIK U.
`M.E¥!-
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
`L.I:wIs F. POWELL, JR. UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE ANNEX
`I100 EAST MAIN STREET. SUITE 501
`RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219-3517
`\vww.cA4.U§C0uRTs,G0v
`
`PATRICIA S. CONNOR
`CLERK
`
`TELEPHONE
`(804) 916-2700
`
`December 31, 2013
`
`East D't't”V"'
`
`Fernando Galindo, Clerk
`U.S. District Court
`401 Er§un‘§orJ§e‘§‘qu$l§'ma
`Alexandria VA 22314
`.
`Re:
`Potterv. Bren et al.
`1:13-cv-01417-CMH-IDD
`
`Dear Mr. Galindo:
`
`—«
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`v
`
`..
`
`*-
`
`p
`.
`_.
`Ii 4 “‘ I
`M0.
`(C/{H1 Nd. //~l~ I3 7*? )
`'
`L ueert N0 4- 44% J
`-
`/1
`‘
`I
`.
`i
`_
`lax,-'-FL".
`/t\_"~£.#‘:
`__
`/4,! _ (2.
`
`/'
`
`Review of the district court docket discloses that the district court is considering a motion under
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b)(for judgment), 52(b)(to amend or make additional findings), 59(1o alter or
`amend judgment or for new trial), or 60 (to vacate) filed within 28 days of entry ofjudgment.
`Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4), a notice of appeal filed after entry ofjudgment but before
`disposition of such a motion becomes effective upon entry of an order disposing of the last such
`4
`motion.
`
`This court will treat the notice of appeal as filed as of the date the district court disposes of such
`motion, and will docket the appeal following disposition of the motion. Please notify this court
`upon entry of an order disposing of the motion.
`
`lfa party wishes to appeal the district court's disposition of the motion, a notice of appeal or
`amended notice of appeal must be filed within the time prescribed for appeal, measured from
`entry of the order disposing of the last such rpotion.
`
`.«
`
`,l_*l_SG’!'~‘t
`
`L
`
`3» /4
`?:3;;%~¥:.t;:
`
`Orlando, FL 32839
`
`(smith
`.;..f.
`@,w;(; iota;
`04/My/an /41 Q4 4879)
`/00,
`I
`I l3«Cl/-—fi/¢i/7~c{/mt/.DD ’
`/z g/flfiléalll USC/l l00.I<l~/@3é{";/ill
`
`

`
`In the United States District Court
`for the Eastern om-i.:: of Virginia
`Alexandria
`
`,
`
`. ‘
`
`§: 15 -c1\/~- C314 3 70 HrM~I"D]
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`(7
`
`(Enter Civil .-lction Number}
`
`Ivm.
`
`3Q!::u:' 3
`
`Piaintifi‘ 5 Name
`
`V.
`
`Dcfendanfs Name
`
`PLEASETAKENOTECE $13:on fiiday {enierdaieforhearing}
`
`r) '
`
`_
`
`at
`
`EQIEEE
`
`10:06 a.m., or as soon thereafter as me
`
`undersigneé may be heard, thc pEaint'iff(s}wi1l present to the
`/
`'
`3
`Courtthe Motion {enter mam type} i Y3.";_I,;'A 1'.3, E U76 Ej!g;{g:>1 AM
`
`x‘
`i
`.5
`Q
`
`
`
` %
`(S:'gr‘l_ature..'I
`:L-3 Y C _
`'
`,‘§’;;:"..,:”“"'=’ was 3. Termpn Ms-
`rerepfmnewmnber figyxhmaby
`(40’?)o’2I'7~3:a>éa
`l)’)(.‘.-H€?V‘,’ZgI@'r9@ \/H450 ‘CW
`
`Emil“ -'
`
`g
`
`%
`
`,
`
`,4
`‘ii/We
`
`1
`
`gsofc
`
`WW7?4’/My/)4
`J 5
`'3
`
`

`
`
`
`O1.E‘1i{ U.5‘ DISTRICT COLFTT
`F.l.EXJal-l{'}"-ILA VIRGIIGIA
`
`Civil Action No. 3: 13-CV-00738-REP
`JUDGE ROBERT E. PAYNE
`
`ISAAC A. POTTER IR,
`Plaintifl’ )
`
`V.
`
`1. ROBERTA S. BREN
`2. OBLON SPWK
`3. LINDA M. KING
`4. TERESA STANEK REA
`
`Defendant,
`
`AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
`
`1, Isaac A. Potter Jr. , deciare under penafiy ofperjnry that the MOTION FOR
`
`DEFAULT
`
`1. I am the attorney for the plaintiff in this action. ISAAC A. POTTER IR.
`
`upon the defendant on , ROBERTA S. BREN
`M. KTNCLTERBSA STANE( REA,
`
`NOVEMBER 8, 2013 AND NOTICE was served on Angus: 29, 2013; Petition
`
`for Caneefiation served on March 1:, 2813 no response has been served within the
`
`time aiiowed by law not has defendant sought additional time within which to
`
`.__ Cw,
`3/3@/ )4,
`
`C><
`
`H[I31/Qargfl
`U 4%
`
`E/Jr §Cn0rF&
`
`

`
`M§,C,s£\*’<;-,éM .ILH€>79
`
`g/aiflpk Léflafc M3» ex”/Jéa/2A;
`
`/
`
`
`
`_
`
`9 3749”
`
`3. The claim of the ptaintiff is for the sum of S 1,000,000,000.00
`
`pins interest from the date ofjudgment as provided bylaw, together with the cuss
`
`of this action.
`Attsrney for Plaintiff(Isaac A. Pot£c L[/
`
`Sworn to and subscribed before
`me this day of, 33
`Npvernber 2013
`
`_?__J
`I//_[ .
`I‘
`..
`
`/‘
`
`'
`
`
`
`My Ccmmission expires:
`
`JivlyK2
`
`[:1 “f
`
`Notary Public
`
`

`
`;_
`
`E;
`
`f,« g
`
`R
`
`A
`
`# In f_I»—-
`
`’}
`
`W
`
`i
`
`I
`
`te%§;\9¥d MO» M 13% age: ~/Q; W}
`?>\i
`»"~’\!“.
`A
`,
`/4 —} :05 5/_%@/24
`
`1
`
`I
`
`-.
`
`Lg?)
`
`I
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on fihis ,0 day ofNovember, 2013, a copy ofthe
`
`1
`
`document(s) entitled Notficc for Entry of Default Judgment, Motion for Entry of
`
`Default wasfwere maiied, postage prepaid to:
`
`I. Roberta S. Bren, 1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 223M»
`
`2. Oblon Spivak , Brad Lytie, 1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`3. Teresa Stanck Rea, P20. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-3451
`
`4. inside W. Williams Uniteé States Attomcy‘s Building, Bnited States Attorney
`
`fer the Easiem District of Virginia, 2 £00 Jamieson Avenue. Aiexandria, VA 2234
`
`(703) 299-3760
`
`5. Cierk: Gienda Wal.
`
`- lbert V. Bryan US. courthouse, 40! courthouse Square,
`
`
`
`
`
`., 5593 3.. Tampa Ave, Orlando, Florida 32332407-2:7-312o,
`
`
`pjm
`No H3 £V-(Df4§l'7CMH—lD9
`
`

`
`—-\
`
`LlSCfl3FC, —;’M5.1q~I379)4Hé_/4
`I
`k\ Cyimz Ma /'
`A
`“ W~l5@.5 75/3,9//4
`IN THE UNITED STATES DESTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`
`mo. 1: :3 -cv-®}4_!._f7 CMH -IDS
`kjucifle :L\.fPrA3
`Q*~’£"‘*””5
`
`Civii Action No. 3: E3-CV—0-G738-REP
`JUDGE ROBERT E. PAYNE
`
`ISAAC A. POTTER JR,
`
`Piaintiff,
`
`V‘.
`
`E. ROBERTA S. BREN
`2. OBLON SPWAK
`3. TERESA STANEK REA
`4. LINDA M. KING
`
`Defendant,
`
`REQUEST FOR BEJTRY OF DEFAULT
`
`Comes now, ISAAC A. POWER IR,
`and hereby requesés flue Cleric K} enter a écfauit against the defendants.
`ROBERTA S. BRENBBLON SPEVAK,’fERESA STANEK. R.Ea\. LINDA M. KING
`on the basis that the recard in this case demonstates that there has been a failure :0
`picad or
`otherwfise defend as proviaicd by Rifle 55(a) of the Federai Rules of Civil
`
`Proccdasre.
`
`
`
`Attorney for PT§aiati“P£'
`
`“* A cam-ifieatc of service mus‘: be smashed to this picaééng.
`5503 S. TAMPA AVE, ORLANDO, FLORDEA 32839, PH# 437-2E7-3120,
`ipolLcr2000@yah0o.com
`
`Fwfizil/EW\é& /
`
`rIz’I;3!§af%
`
`E: :3~cu-ag;4;7
`
`fiwg)
`f’)(j‘*f§)
`
`

`
`
`
`May 29,2014
`
`Dear Customer:
`
`The following is the proof-of-delivery for tracking number 448175310061 174.
`
`
` Delivery Infonnation:
`Status:
`Delivered
`Delivery location:
`Washington, DC
`
`Signed for by:
`Service type:
`Special Handling:
`
`BNASH
`FedEx Ground
`Direct Signature Required
`
`Delivery date:
`
`May 19, 2014 10:36
`
`Signature image is available. In order to view image and detailed information, the shipper or payor account number of
`the shipment must be provided.
`
`
`
` Shipping Information:
`
`Tracking number:
`
`448175310061174
`
`Ship date:
`Weight:
`
`May 15, 2014
`1.1 lbs/0.5 kg
`
`Flecipient:
`Washington, DC US
`
`Shipper:
`Orlando, FL US
`
`Thank you for choosing FedEx.
`
`
`
`

`
`FORM 2
`COVER SHEET
`
`Em OED2 ftlniteh étates Qtnutt of Jfehetal Qtlaims
`
`P1aintiff(s) orPetitioner(s) T F
`
`
`
`Co.
`
`‘Sheet
`
`Z
`
`Ifthis isamulti-plaintiffcase,pursuanttoRCFC20(a}.pleaseattachan alpliahe izfltljuniherctl Iislul'all plainliFfs.
`_'
`Name ofthe attorney ofrecord (See RCFC 83.l(c_)}.:__..__——i
`
`Firm Name:
`
`Post Office Box:
`
`Street Address:
`
`City-State-Zip:
`
`Telephone & Facsimile Numbers:
`
`E—mail Address:
`
`_
`
`Is the attorney ofrecord admitted to the Court ofFederal Claims Bar?
`
`D Yes D’l%/
`240%
`III Yes
`Does the attorney of record have a Court of Federal Claims ECF account?
`If not admitted to the court or enrolled in the court’s ECF system. please call (202) 357-6402 for admission papers and/or enrollment instructions.
`
`,
`
`@ El
`Nature of Suit Code:
`Select only one (three digit) nature-of-suit code from the attached sheet.
`If number 213 is used, please identify partnership or partnership group. If numbers 118, 134, 226, 312, 356, or 528 are used, please explain.
`
`
`
`Agency Identification Code:
`See attached sheet for three-digit codes.
`
`Use estimate if specific amount is not pleaded.
`
`Amount Claimed:
`
`Disclosure Statement:
`
`Is a RCF C 7.] Disclosure Statement required?
`If yes, please note that two copies are necessary.
`
`D Yes
`
`El No
`
`Bid Protest:
`Indicate approximate dollar amount ofprocurement at issue: $
`Is plaintiffa small business?
`§(Yes
`D No
`Vaccine Case:
`Date of Vaccination:
`
`L( 5
`N
`_
`_
`/_
`l ; F (fig figQ A»
`flf‘-" ii ‘i 9'9)’
`*7‘ 6
`am *
`-
`ijgs \
`
`Related Cases:
`Is this case directly related to any pending or previous case?
`
`If yes, you are required to file a separate notice of directly related case(s). See RCFC 40.2.
`
`M
`es
`
`my In
`3 y 5"Q 5+-fiflfl k./Id_hm.d-{-
`121 No
`1 13 ‘CU * CZ/<1/’7—CrL«1H - IDD
`
`l
`
`Claw, Ma /<1-/5305
`No. /</«I37? 5/gg/,4
`
`CPFFC; HZ-187‘?
`
`

`
`
`
`
`USM-285 is a 5-part form. Fill out the form and print 5 copies. Sign as needed and route as specified below.
`
`“-5- D°P*‘”“‘°'“ 0‘ J““‘°°
`United States Marshals Service
`
`PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN
`See "InstrucIz'0ns or Service 0 Process l)V
`Marshal"
`
` J
`
`A/lg
` ®i55
`
`
`
`I
`_
`Ml; OF ljD|\r’ll)U:’\L. COMPANY, LTORPOR.-‘KT UN. ETC. TO SEl{Vi-'. OR DI.-LSCRIPTION '
`l1()Pl'5.l?.'l’Y TO SEIZF. ORCONDEMN
`
` ADDMRESS (Street or RFD, .-Lwmmen
`
`.._.-n.
`
`Number of process to be
`sewed with this Form 285
`
`
`
`
`E Low
`
`Ru WW
`l:.,M>rél¢4 ,3._\’eiil,l-'
`I
`(:3/lg;r“.'c.g_figl Q./)l«.'.n(tt$L Um,-.,.«.i;
`Checkforservice /
`I.’/:36:-3‘
`lr’.'3lllrl-'3'".-‘ ll/4~’l'f\.
`t'\i-LL)
`L/t>fi~<;l new ’““
`use-;¢4:«4,«.,:..................................:i+::i;_%;r:;.......................................................................,
`
`
`SPECIAL lN5iTRUC"I'|()NS I
`Tl-IER INFORMATION THAT WILL ASSIST IN EXPEDITING SERVICE (Include Business and Alternate Addresses
`
`All Telephone Numbers, and Estimated Times A vailable for Service):
`
`Fold
`
`Fold
`
`District of
`I acknowledge receipt for the total
`Total Process
`
`
`
`Origin
`number of process indicated.
`(Sign onl_v_/or USM 285 ifmore
`than one USM 285 is submitted)
`
`I hereby certify and return that I lj have personally served , D have legal evidence of service, D have executed as shown in "Remarks", the process described
`on the individual , company, corporation, etc., at the address shown above on the on the individual , company, corporation, etc. shown at the address inserted below.
`
`
`
`
`Signature of Authorized USMS Deputy or Clerk
`
`No.
`
`D I hereby certify and return that [ am unable to locate the individual, company, corporation, etc. named above (See remarks below
`
`Name and title of individual served (if/wt shown above)
`
`D A person of Suitable age and discretion
`then residing in defendant's usual place
`of abode
`
`Address {complete only different than shown above)
`
`Date
`
`Time
`
`i:l am
`l:l pm
`
`Service Fee
`
`Total Mileage Charges Forwarding Fee
`including endeavors)
`
`Total Charges
`
`Advance Deposits
`
`S. Mzirslial’-" or
`A mount owed to
`{Amount of lZcf11I1d*}
`
`Signature of U.S. Marshal or Deputy
`
`
`
`REMARKS:
`
`PRINT 5 (~0plE__g;
`
`1, CLERK OF THE COURT
`2. USMS RECORD
`3. NOTICE OF SERVICE
`4. BILLING STATEMENT’: To be returned to the U.S. Marshal with payment,
`if any amount is owed. Please remit promptly payable to U.S. Marshal.
`
`,
`5:ACI(NOW‘I:EDGME1:IT or RECEIPT
`-
`ix 5 ’
`' /
`Mel\\»zJ.I4l’lb@,*i
`m,i</»377
`/30? it
`
`
`PRIOR EDITIONS MAY BE USED
`
`Forrn USM-285
`
`Rev. 12/80
`
`

`
`FORM 5
`
`EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FORM
`
`APPLICATION
`
`FOR FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
`Title 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), Title II of Public Law 96-481, 94 STAT 2325
`‘
`_
`I.‘ /3—c\/~49/4ii7--
`
`I. COURT
`
`United States Court of Federal Claims
`
`_
`
`4. NAME OF APPLICANT (One per form)
`r"‘
`.
`-—-F
`,
`,.
`I.
`),
`__,_
`.
`_j__.:;p,pg3_, 5‘
`.
`.g:i'I”a.rk
`9?.
`
`I
`
`'
`6. NATURE OF APPLICATION R
`
`-
`2. DATE FILED
`_\'''
`-
`U SFTIZ’ -' I61‘
`0-
`
`
`
`(SIDPITO)
`{_il{_'y'\.‘L.
`'
`. GOVERNMENT AGENCY I VOLVED IN CLAIM
`
`3. DOCKET NO.
`
`7. APP AL FROM:
`
`/
`
`IZBANKRUPTCY COURT
`
`-: ISTRICT COURT
`El OTHER:
`7A. DATE FILED IN LOWER
`URT
`__
`“ >
`I
`I 0:3 T ‘Q
`
`7B. DOCKET NO.
`
`,
`I
`
`,3
`I K’)
`1,1;
`’_
`‘L’ IH
`
`’
`
`A. El Original application under 28 use. §2412(d)(1)(A)
`after judgment in civil action against U.S.
`B. I3 Appeal of fees and expenses awarded by Lower Court
`(If Item 6B is checked go to Item 7.)
`C. III Original application under 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(3) after
`review of agency decision.
`D. El Petition for leave to appeal an administrative agency
`fee determination under 5 U.S.C. 504 c 2 .
`9. DAT FILED IN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY
`8. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY DOCKET NO.
`'/T‘
`r
`'
`_
`I
`.'
`'
`'
`.
`
`-“\ *--R‘--— -o(3;I“m
`Wk“
`"
`
`
`10. SHOWING OF “PREVAILHIINIG PARTY” STATUS (28 U.S.C. §24‘l2(d)(1)(B)):
`_-—.\
`
`is a tent: order. court order. or other relevant document attached‘?
`‘YES El NO
`
`11. SHOWING OF ELIGIBILITY (28 U.S.C. §2412[d){2)(E!)}:
`'
`Ir-PIN."
`“I
`"'
`-
`,
`'
`_
`
`
`is net worth information attached? YES III NO LI-=_.='r'3"
`+ . i I :3" ’-7'
`.
`,r
`I 65
`
`
`
`
`__
`. ENTER ALLEGATION THAT GOVERNMENTrOSlTION WAS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED (28 U.S.C. § t112(d)(1)[B)):
`
`9&8. m “E”
`'
`
`
` 13. Foe EAC AMOU
`
`(28 u.s.c. §2412(d)(2)(A)):
`
`
`
`
`
`—-
`
`
`
`
`AMOUNT CLAIMED
`
`A. ATTORNEY FEES ........................................................................................... ..
`B.
`C. ANALYSIS ........................ ..
`D. ENGINEERING REPORT...
`
`
`
`F. PROJECT ................................. ..
`G. EXPERT WITNESS
`H. OTHER FEES AND EXPENSES - SP
`(1)
`(2)
`{3}
`
`I. TOTAL FEES AND EXPENSES...........
`
`14. SIGNATURE
`
`
`
`
`NOTE: THIS FORM SHOULD ACCOM
`
`ANY YOUR CLAIM
`
`{EN FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT
`
`
`
`Cm /Oat /IAI377
`My‘,
`5/l3@//4
`
`187
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
`
`ISAAC A. POTTER JR.,
`
`V.
`
`THE UNITED STATES
`
`NO.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`

`
`A0 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance ofCounse1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`for the
`
`L /M wj
`
`IQJWC
`
`'
`
`4"
`
`(9 /. 5 Q ='
`Plainufl
`V.
`r
`
`,
`
`Q
`
`X
`
`.
`
`/JT.’/Weoz éjgaéfiej
`
`.
`
`3
`)
`)
`
`;
`
`Case No
`
`APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
`
`To:
`
`The Clfifk ofcomt and all parties 0f1'ec01'd
`
`Ia111ad111itted 01‘ ot11e1wise a1Ifl]D1'iZE-(1 to practice in this comt. and I appear in this case as colmselfol‘:
`
`
`
`Primed name and bar number
`
`Date:$46/W /aavef/f
`
`.LflfiW '
`
`C
`
`Addrm
`
`J7p.::#TL‘2¢éL
`(</ :1 J I
`
`E-m as‘! address
`
`‘Telephone number
`
`;/am [Y
`
`——
`
`—
`
`FAXm:mber
`
`Cm N r¢~r5z25
`
`

`
`In th,e\United States Court of Federal Claims
`\
`
`(1
`
`Application to Proceed
`In F077110 Pc1t.7.)z>.r1Lr
`
`*****-J£-
`
` .
`
`.requestto proceed without being
`r
`required to prepay filing. fees, I state that because of1113:‘ poverty. I 3111 um bk to pay such fees; that
`I believe I am entitled to relief The nature ofmy action, or the issues I intencl to present are briefly
`stated :1 s follows:
`
`1.
`
`IQ
`
`In ftutlier suppoit of this application, I amwer the following questions
`
`A1*e yoL1prese11t‘t§-»' einployed?
`
`ElYes51/
`
`.
`
`a.
`
`ht
`
`Ifthe answer is “yes ", state the ainount 0f}’01Il‘S3lE]1'}-' or wages pE‘1’I11011tl1. and give
`the name and address ofyour employer. (Int both gross and net sa]2u’y‘)
`
`lfthe aiiswer is *ho'E state the date oflast ei11plo_\-menl and the amount ofthe salaiy
`
`andwages permonthwhichyoureceived.Q/é/Z/‘
`
`(3))Q? M449
`
`Have you received within the past twelve months any money from 311}! ofthe
`fo llowing s ources‘?
`a.
`Busines s, profession or other form ofself-e111plo'_y111e11t‘?
`b,
`Rent payinents, interest or dividends‘?
`C<
`Pensions, annuities or life insurance payinents
`(1.
`Gifts or inlieiitances‘?
`
`
`
`e.
`
`A115? other sources‘?
`
`Ifthe answer to any ofthe above is "yes", describe each source ofmoney and state the
`amount, received from eacl1du11'1'1g the past twelve months.
`
`
`
`

`
`Do you own any cash, or do you have money in checking, savings.
`accounts’?
`
`‘
`
`y o
`Yes
`
`30
`
`If the answer is "yes", state the total value ofthe items owned.
`
`Do you own any reai estate, stocks. bonds, notes. automobiles or other vaiuabie
`
`prop erty (excluding ordinary household furnishmgs and clothing)? |j
`
`If the answer is "yes", describe the property and state its approximate vaiue.
`
`{Jr
`
`6.
`
`List the persons who are dependent upon you for support. state your reEat.ionship to those
`persons. and indtctuc hon much you enmribtztc: towarci their support.
`35c.s«._;- K15‘/036 "O3-34,0/€'a€
`‘_'"j1:»'ue—...—1.,§ Fbflezr» Lair}: ~ ._:{ :5 4,1, [552
`Are you a prisoner? El Yes
`
`Ifthe answer is “Yes”. you must submit a certified copy of your trust fund account
`statelncnt (or ilxstéttatiomi eqttivalent) for the 6-month period imtrlediateiy preceding your
`fiiéng ofthe etm1pia.i.nt as required by 28 US. C. §l915(a) (2) (2000).
`
`I declare under penaity of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`28 [§.S.C.§ 1746)
`
`.-
`__v
`{(1
`_\_-,_£_
`(Sig11atLn‘e oi A[.'np]ic;1 nt
`
`-
`
`-
`
`
`
` I.‘
`
`in r—-..
`
`'
`_ _;
`
`

`
`K CK
`@109
`
`.aT;I.;..
`
`U. S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`,;\,)L.:’r
`/K;
`
`/71 -T1 /7‘?
`= {‘:E.,-—'’."_\
`5/ 0/
`
`V
`
`EASTERN DISTTRICT OF VIRGINIA-(ALEXANDRIA)
`
`CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE# 1:13-CV-01417-CMH-IDD
`
`ISAAC A. POTTER JR.,
`
`DATE FILED: 11/05/2013
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`JURY DEMAND- NONE
`
`V.
`
`IURISDICTION: FEDERAL QUESTION
`
`1. ROBERTA S. BREN et al,
`2.LINDAM.KINGeta1,
`3.0BLON SPIVAK et al,
`
`(23415 » 1
`
`‘C
`‘CI’
`N.‘
`I
`b “H DI
`N 1‘
`Vw/I 7‘C/ J
`
`/'
`
`I
`
`4. TERESA STANEK REA et a1,
`
`DEFENDANT(S),
`
`;
`I
`A 1'11 5-NC-I
`;1\\“’C}7'"HC5
`MEMORANDUM OF LAW 1% C/WC_:’>’OC_,f.g
`
`\
`ff? ,1
`
`.
`H /
`
`PURSUANT TO 28 U.S. CODE SUBSECTION 1292 (B)-INTERLOCUTORY
`DECISIONS (UNDER SECTION 1631 OF THIS TITLE); WHEN A MOTION
`TO TRANSFER AN ACTION (NO. 1:13-CV-01417-CMH-IDD) TO THE U.S.
`COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS IS FILED IN A DISTRICT (03/10/2014
`FILED), NO FUTPHER PROCEEDING SHALL BE TAKEN IN THE DISTRICT
`COURT UNTIL 60 DAYS AFTER THE COURT HAS RULED UPON THE
`
`MOTION TO TRANSFER ACTION (NO. 1:13-CV-01417-CMH-IDD.
`
`IF AN APPEAL IS TAKEN FROM TIDE DISTRICT COURT’S GRANT OR
`
`DENIAL OF THE MOTION, PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE FUTHER STAYED
`UNTIL THE APPEAL HAS BEEN DECIDED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. THE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE
`
`DISTRICT COURT SHALL NOT BAR THE GRANTING OF PRELIMINARY
`
`OR INIUNCTIVE RELIEF, WHERE APPROPRIATE AND WHERE
`EXPEDITION IS REASONABLY NECESSARY. HOWEVER, DURING THE
`
`PERIOD IN WHICH PROCEEDINGS ARE STAYED AS PROVIDED IN THIS
`
`.1
`
`(N
`
` Q”/““‘§'*‘J‘‘W3
`~ ‘I’
`N/).
`l%13—C\//(DI<1l“7~C,r\/1H «I113
`
`
`
`(‘T
`I
`
`

`
`4,W¢;\\a. z<fcj;o_ /=7
`my /«;—I:>és5
`
`3/53$ am;
`/
`
`SUBPARAGRAPH, NO TRANSFER TO THE COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
`TO THE MOTION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT (UNTIL THE MOTION TO
`
`TRANSFER AN ACTION HAS BEEN RULED UPON.)
`
`1. THIS COURT HAS NO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND OR
`
`PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN PURSUANT TO FRCP 5 5(a),
`
`DEFENDANTS FAILURE TO APPEAR AND OR FAILURE TO JOIN;
`
`SUNIIVIONS SERVED AGAIN ON 1/7/2014 AND FAILURE TO
`
`RESPOND, AND OR ANSWER DUE 1/28/2014; GOVERNMENT
`OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES ANSWER DUE 3/28/2014.
`
`2. THE PLAINTIFF BELIEVES THIS COURT LACKS A JURISDICTION, I
`
`WANT TO SEE THE SUPPOSED JURISDICTION THAT WAS DULY
`
`PLACED INTO EVIDENCE, THIS MATTER HAS BEEN
`CHALLENGED BY A MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO: 1:13-CV-
`
`01417-CMH-IDD TO THE U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ON
`
`3/10/2014 FOR PROPER JURISDICTION AND REHEARING ENBANC
`
`IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`CASE NO. 14-1036.
`
`A. KALB V. FEUERSTEIN (1940) 308 U.S. 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84L ed 370;
`ex parte Rowland (1882) 104 U.S. 604, 26 L.E.D. 861
`B. EARLE V. MCVEIGH, 91 US 503, 23 L ED 398; 4(b) prather V10yd, 86
`
`U0
`
`Idaho 45, 382 P2d 910
`Hanson V. Denckla, 357 US 235, 2L Ed 2d 1283, 78 S Ct 1228
`(see Rose V. Himely (1808110 4 Cranch 241, 241, 2L ed 608; Pennoyer
`V. Neff (1877) 95 US 714, 24 L ed 565; Thompson V. Whitman (1873) 18
`wa11457, 21 IED 897; Windsor V. McVeigh (1876) 93 US 274, 23 L ed
`914; McDonald V. Mabee (1917) 243 US 90, 37 Set 343, 61 L ed 608. U
`s v. Holtzman, 762 F. 2d 720 (9th Cir. 1985).
`
`

`
`Appeal: 14-1036
`
`DOC: 22
`
`Filed: 03/10/2014
`
`Pg: 3 of 15
`
`C/LAB, ii‘) I }379 FC/ .2
`jog,
`ierv mag‘;
`~-at
`
`~_»
`
`V.
`
`: ROBERTA S. BREN; OBLON SPIVAK; TERESA STANEK REA; LINDA M. KING
`
`Defendants - Appellees
`
`FRAP 35 & 40, LOC. R. 40(c), FRAP 41, LOC. R. 41, PETITION FOR
`REHEARING EN BANC AT THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND MOTION TO STAY TI-IE MANDATE
`SETS FORTH GOOD OR PROBABLE CAUSE FOR A STAY;CHALLENGE
`TO JURISDICTION FRCP 60. RELIEF FROM IUDGIVIENT OR ORDER
`EXCEEDING JURISDICTION. RULE 4001. RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC
`STAY; PROIHBITING KECONDITIONION THE USE, SALE, OR LEASE OF
`PROPERTY; REGISTRATION NO. 3431651, SERIAL NO. 76477503.
`
`1. A MATERIAL FACTUAL OR JUDGMENT WAS
`
`OVERLOOKED;
`
`28 U.S. Code § 1292 - Interlocutory decisions
`
`Except as provided in subsections (0) and (cl) of this section, the courts of appeals shall have
`jurisdiction of appeals fi'orn:
`(1) Interlocutory orders ofthe district courts ofthe United States, the United States District Court
`for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the
`Virgin Islands, or ofthe judges t ereof, granting. continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving
`injunctions, or refiising to dissolve or modify injunctions, except where a direct review may be
`had in the Supreme Court;
`(2) Interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refilsing orders to Wind up receiverships or to
`take steps to accomplish the purposes thereof, such as directing sales or other disposals of
`PTOPWY;
`(3) Interlocutory decrees of such district courts or the judges thereof determining the rights and
`liabilities of the parties to admiralty cases in which appeals fiom final decrees are allowed.
`(b) When a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this
`section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which
`there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order
`may materially advance the ultimate termination ofthe litigation, he shall so state in writing in
`such order. The Court of Appeals which would have jurisdiction of an appeal of such action may
`thereupon, in its discretion, permit an appeal to be taken fiom such order, if application is made
`-"
`‘ii-2’:
`.3.?./“,.
`‘F
`.'
`'
`".r.
`'I
`/‘I-\\
`."‘-I‘:
`i
`i-
`/.._._.._-
`
`4'
`
`{L Li?“
`
`/,);z’i3
`
`

`
`Pg: 4 of 15
`
`Filed: O3i10/2014
`Appeal: 14-1036
`Doc: 22
`«
`~
`C/i;~J\\0.i*i—i3>7‘7”
`kite. i<i~i5@5 :3/3??//4’
`to it within ten days after the entry of the order: Provided, however, That application for an
`appeal hereunder shall not stay proceedings in the district court unless the district judge or the
`Court of Appeals or a judge thereof shall so order.
`(c) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction-
`(l) of an appeal from an interlocutory order or decree described in subsection (a) or (b) ofthis
`section in any case over which the court would have jurisdiction of an appeal under section 1295
`of this title; and
`(2) of an appeal from a judgment in a civil action for patent infringement which would otherwise
`be appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and is final except for
`an accounting.
`
`2. The opinion/order conflicts with a decision of the USSUPREME COURT,
`THIS COURT, OR ANOTHER COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE
`CONFLICT WAS NOT ADDRESS:
`-._—
`A. Judgment is a void ‘judgment if court that rendered ‘judgment lacked
`jurisdiction of the subiect matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner
`inconsistent with due process, Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28
`U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 — Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (118.0. 1985
`_B_. )B.. On certiorari this Court may not review guestions of fact. Brown v.
`Blanchard, 39 Mich 790. It is not at liberty to determine disputed facts [Hyde V.
`Nelson, 11 Mich 353}, nor to review the weight of the evidence. Linn v. Roberts,
`15 Mich 443', Lynch V. People, 16 Mich 472. Cerriorari is an appropriate remedy
`to get rid of [({a void [udgmenr one which there is no evidence to sustaln-})}
`Lake Shore 8. Michi an Southern Railwa Co. v. Hunt 39 Mich 469.
`0: 10/13 _ 552 Fsirrs v. KRMGH. 5ow>Rervis Codiar oi‘/1iiciiic~AM
`92 M. VU- 20: ¢o4,as4 Mich. 47
`3. The Case INVOLES ONE OR MORE QUESTIONS OF EXCEPTIONAL IMPORTANCE;
`
`28 U.S. Code § 2403 - Intervention by United
`States or a State; constitution