`ESTTA261249
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`01/19/2009
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92049928
`Defendant
`Homeserve plc
`Brian P. O'Donnell
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`UNITED STATES
`Motion to Suspend for Civil Action
`Brian P. O'Donnell
`bodonnell@morganlewis.com, trademarks@morganlewis.com
`/Brian P. O'Donnell/
`01/19/2009
`Motion to Suspend.PDF ( 75 pages )(3797548 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of Registration No. 3,224,227
`Issued: April 3, 2007
`Mark: HOME SERVICE USA Plus Design
`
`In the matter of Registration No. 2,969,200
`Issued: July 19, 2005
`Mark: HOME SERVICE Plus Design
`
`Consolidated Cancellation No.: 92049928
`
`Filed: September 12, 2008
`
`) ) ) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME
`
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`vs.
`
`HOMESERVE PLC
`
`Respondent.
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND CONSOLIDATED CANCELLATION PROCEEDING
`AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF
`
`Pursuant to T.B.M.P. § 5l0.02(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 2.1 l7(a), Respondent Homeserve plc
`
`(“Respondent”), by and through counsel Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, hereby respectfully
`
`requests suspension of Consolidated Cancellation No. 92049928 (“Cancellation Proceeding”)
`
`filed by Petitioner Cross Country Home Services, Inc. (“Petitioner”) pending resolution of the
`
`civil action pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida,
`
`styled Cross Country Home Services, Inc. v. Homeserve plc and Home Services USA
`
`Corporation, Civil Action No. 08-CV-61456 (hereinafter the “Civil Action”).
`
`I.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Petitioner filed its Consolidated Petition to Cancel (“Petition”) on September l2, 2008
`
`against Respondent’s Reg. No. 2,969,200 for the mark HOME SERVICE Plus Design and Reg.
`
`No. 3,224,227 for the mark HOME SERVICE USA Plus Design, both for use in connection with
`
`insurance services, namely insurance for maintenance and repair services relating to utilities, gas
`
`boilers, household appliances and installations, plumbing services, electrical services; and the
`
`
`
`installation, maintenance and repair services relating to utilities and household appliances and
`
`installations; plumbing services, electrical services.
`
`As grounds for cancellation, Petitioner has asserted genericness and a likelihood of
`
`confusion with its alleged marks HOMESERVE and HOMESERVE 24 (collectively, the
`
`“HOMESERVE marks”). As a basis for its likelihood of confusion claim, Petitioner alleged
`
`rights in the HOMESERVE marks arising from common law and federal registration (namely,
`
`Reg. No. 2,944,609 for HOMESERVE and Reg. No. 2,103,948 for HOMESERVE 24), both for
`
`use in connection with home maintenance repair services provided through a network of selected
`
`independent contractors.
`
`Concurrently with the filing of the Cancellation Proceeding, Petitioner filed the Civil
`
`Action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for federal
`
`trademark infringement and federal and common law unfair competition against Respondent and
`
`its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, Home Service USA Corporation (“HSUSA”), relating to
`
`Respondent’s alleged unlawfiil use of the mark HOMESERVE.
`
`In the Civil Action, Petitioner
`
`based its likelihood of confusion claims on rights arising from common law and the same federal
`
`registrations for the HOMESERVE marks as it asserted in this Cancellation Proceeding.‘
`
`On January 16, 2009, Respondent filed an Answer to the Civil Action denying that it
`
`infringes Petitioner’s alleged rights in the HOMESERVE marks. Respondent’s U.S. subsidiary,
`
`HSUSA, also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non—infringement of the
`
`HOMESERVE marks under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ l 1 l4 and ll25(a), respectively.
`
`Copies of the relevant pleadings in the Civil Action are attached hereto as Exhibits l—2.
`
`1 CCHS stated in the “Related Proceedings” section of its Petition that it “has filed a lawsuit for trademark
`infringement against Registrant and its related company Home Service USA Corp. in the United States District
`Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-61456.”
`
`
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`The Board has inherent power to suspend proceedings and it has been the Board’s long-
`
`standing policy to suspend a Board action when there is a related civil action which may have a
`
`bearing on the Board proceeding. See Other Telephone Co. v. Connecticut Nat 7 Telephone Co.,
`
`Inc., 181 U.S.P.Q. 125, 126-27 (T.T.A.B. 1974); Townley Clothes, Inc. v. Goldring, Inc, 100
`
`U.S.P.Q. 57, 58 (“mt is deemed the sounder practice to suspend the [Board] proceedings
`
`pending termination of the Court action.”); 6 J. Thomas McCarthy, MCCARTHY ON
`
`TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 32:47 (4th ed. 2008) (“It is standard procedure for the
`
`Trademark Board to stay administrative proceedings pending the outcome of court litigation
`
`between the same parties involving related issues”); see also T.B.M.P. § 5l0.02(a) and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 2.1 17(a). The language of 37 CPR. § 2.1 17(a) makes plain this policy:
`
`Whenever it shall come to the attention of the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board that a party or parties to a pending case are engaged
`in a civil action or another Board proceeding which may have a
`bearing on the case, proceedings before the Board may be
`suspended until termination of the civil action or the other Board
`proceeding.
`
`Further supporting the Board’s preference for suspension is the well—settled principle that
`
`to the extent issues in common with those in a Board proceeding may be decided in a federal
`
`civil action, the federal court decision is often binding, under principles of collateral estoppel, on
`
`the Board but Board decisions are not binding on federal courts. See, e. g., Goya Foods Inc. v.
`
`Tropicana Products, Inc., 848 F.2d 848 (2d Cir. 1988); American Bakeries Co. v. Pan—0~Gola’
`
`Baking Co., 650 F. Supp. 563 (D. Minn. 1986); In re Alfred Dunhill Ltd, 224 U.S.P.Q. 501
`
`(T.T.A.B. 1984) (“A federal court determination of a trademark issue normally has a binding
`
`effect in subsequent proceedings before the Board involving the same parties and issue.”)
`
`In this case, Petitioner and Respondent are parties in both proceedings. The marks
`
`
`
`asserted by CCHS in both proceedings are identical (i.e., the HOMESERVE marks). Both
`
`proceedings also involve common issues of law because Respondent’s U.S. subsidiary, HSUSA,
`
`has counterclaimed for a declaration of non—infringement that HSUSA’s use of the HOME
`
`SERVICE marks does not infringe Petitioner’s alleged rights in its HOMESERVE marks.
`
`HSUSA’s counterclaim will necessarily be resolved by the district court’s determination on the
`
`issue of likelihood of confusion — substantially the same legal standard applied in this
`
`Cancellation Proceeding to determine Respondent’s entitlement to maintain its HOME
`
`SERVICE registrations. Accordingly, however the district court rules on likelihood of
`
`confusion, the district court’s ruling will bear on this Cancellation Proceeding. Furthermore, in
`
`resolving the Civil Action, the district court will be required to make findings regarding various
`
`factors supporting or negating a likelihood of confusion, namely the strength of the asserted
`
`HOMESERVE marks, the proximity of the parties’ services, the relatedness of the trade
`
`channels, and consumer sophistication, among other factors. Accordingly, the decision in the
`
`Civil Action will have a bearing on this Cancellation Proceeding
`
`Conservation of the parties’ resources favor suspension of this Cancellation Proceeding
`
`because it is highly likely that both proceedings will involve the production of the same, or
`
`substantially the same, documents and will require the testimony of the same witnesses.
`
`Moreover, the promotion ofjudicial economy also favor suspension of this Cancellation
`
`Proceeding because many (if not all) of the issues will be adjudicated by a single decisional
`
`body, the federal district court.
`
`In advance of the filing of this motion, Respondent sought Petitioner’s stipulation to
`
`suspend these proceedings pending disposition of the Civil Action and was refused. Petitioner
`
`did not explain the basis for its refusal to stipulate to the suspension.
`
`
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For all of the forgoing reasons, Respondent Homeserve plc respectfully requests that the
`
`Board issue an Order suspending the Cancellation Proceeding pending the outcome of the related
`
`Civil Action.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`HOMESERVE PLC
`
`Dated: January 19, 2009
`
`
`
`
`rett 1. Miller
`Brian P. O’Donnell
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`(202) 739~3000
`(202) 739-3001 (fax)
`
`Counselfor Respondent Homeserve plc
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1, Brian P. O’Donnell, do hereby certify that on January 19, 2009 I served a true and
`
`correct copy of the foregoing MOTION TO SUSPEND CONSOLIDATED CANCELLATION
`
`PROCEEDING AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF by first class mail, postage
`
`pre-paid, and electronic mail on:
`
`David Wolf, Esq.
`John L. Strand, Esq.
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`dwolf@wolfgreenfield.com, jstrand@wolfgreenfield.co1n
`
`gas 2" 05%,, £4
`rian P. O’Donnell
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`(202) 739-3000
`(202) 739-3001 (fax)
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456—PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock tO9/12/2008
`
`Page 1 of 22
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO. :
`
`08-CV-61456-Seitz-O'Su|livan
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES,
`INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`HOME SERVICE USA CORR, a Florida
`
`corporation and
`HOMESERVE PLC, a foreign
`
`corporation
`
`Defendants.
`
`/
`
`FlLEDby VT o.c.
`ELECTRONIC
`
`SEPT. 12, 2008
`
`srsvsw M. uxmmom-:
`CLERK u.s. msr. c7.
`s.o. or FLA.-MIAMI
`
`COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
`
`Cross Country Home Services, Inc. (“Cross Country Home Services”) brings this civil
`
`action against Home Service USA Corp. (“Home Service USA”) and Homeserve plc.
`
`NATURE OF ACTION
`
`l.
`
`Cross Country Home Services contends Home Service USA infringes its federally
`
`registered trademarks HOMESERVE and HOMESERVE 24 by using “Homeserve plc” as a
`
`mark in promoting identical services in the same trading areas previously established by Cross
`
`Country Home Services. Home Services USA’s infringement is apparently controlled and
`
`abetted by its United Kingdom parent Homeserve plc.
`
`PLAINTIFF CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff, Cross Country Home Services, is a Delaware corporation with its
`
`principal place of business at 1625 NW 136th Avenue, Suite 200, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33323.
`
`1of22
`
`
`
`08—6eVe-6:tM5/6>4$@Il>zeO'ScLdli|i.vram Entered on FLSD Dock tO9/12/2008
`V
`
`Page 2 of 22
`
`Plaintiff has been engaged in the business of administering various home protection and repair
`
`services since 1988.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff owns a number of United States trademark registrations, including for the
`
`marks HOMESERVE (U.S. Reg. No. 2,944,609; registered April 26, 2004) for home
`
`maintenance repair services provided through a network of selected independent contractors;
`
`and, HOMESERVE 24 (U.S. Reg. No. 2,103,948; registered Oct. 7, 1997) for home maintenance
`
`repair services provided through a network of selected independent contractors (the
`
`“HOMESERVE marks”). The registrations for the HOMESERVE marks are in full force and
`
`effect. The registration for HOMESERVE 24 is incontestable. Copies of these registrations are
`
`attached to this Complaint as Exhibits A and B.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff also owns rights in the HOMESERVE marks at common law.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Home Service USA, is a Florida corporation whose principal place
`
`of business is at 5301 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL 33126.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant I-Iomeserve plc is a U.K. corporation having its principal place of
`
`business at Cable Dr., Walsall, West Midlands WS2 7BN, England.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`7.
`
`This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition arising under
`
`the laws of the United States, namely the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. Therefore, this
`
`Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. This Court has supplemental
`
`jurisdiction over Cross Country Home Services’ state—law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367 in
`
`that the state law claim is integrally related to the Federal claim and arises from a common
`
`3426239
`
`2 M22
`
`_ 2 __
`
`
`
`08-edele-6:3815&‘l$£il>Z£i‘S’cldi1iitVl8|l1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 3 of 22
`
`nucleus of operative facts such that the administration of such claims herein is in the interest of
`
`judicial economy.
`
`8.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Home Service USA, which is a citizen
`
`of Florida and a resident of Miami, Florida. This Court has personal jurisdiction over
`
`Homeserve plc pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 48. l 93(b) because Homeserve plc committed tortious acts
`
`of trademark infringement and unfair competition in Florida.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because at least a
`
`substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims of this complaint took place in this judicial
`
`district because Cross Country Home Services is based in this district as is Home Services USA.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`10.
`
`Defendant Homeserve plc, a company based in United Kingdom, formed the
`
`Home Service USA Corp., as a subsidiary corporation in the United States. Homeserve plc uses
`
`the mark HOMESERVE in the U.K. for services identical to those offered by Home Service
`
`USA in the U.S.
`
`11.
`
`Home Service USA offers nearly identical services as Cross Country Home
`
`Services in identical or overlapping trading areas under and in connection with the infringing
`
`mark HOMESERVE. This use is exemplified on Home Service USA’s website and marketing
`
`materials which display the following use of the mark HOMESERVE:
`
`Home Service A
`
`USA
`
`or Homeserve pl:
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Horneserve plc has authority over Home Service
`
`USA’s transactions, including Home Service USA’s uses of the mark HOMESERVE.
`
`$426239
`
`3of22
`
`_ 3 _,
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456-PAS
`
`egcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 4 of 22
`
`13.
`
`These activities occurred notwithstanding Home Service USA’s and Horneserve
`
`plc’s knowledge of the longtime use, ownership and registration of the I-IOMESERVE marks by
`
`Cross Country Home Services in the United States.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, Home Service USA adopted and uses the mark
`
`HOMESERVE at the direction of Homeserve plc, despite their knowledge of the longtime use,
`
`Ownership and registration of the HOMESERVE marks by Cross Country Home Services.
`
`15.
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ common law and registered rights in the
`
`HOMESERVE marks pre-date Home Service USA’s use of HOMESERVE.
`
`16.
`
`Cross Country Home Services placed Home Service USA on actual notice of the
`
`similarity and likelihood of confusion between Home Service USA’s uses of HOMESERVE and
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks.
`
`17.
`
`Home Service USA willfully disregarded Cross Country Home Services" rights
`
`and continued to use HOMESERVE in interstate commerce.
`
`18.
`
`The acts of Home Service USA and Homeserve plc, as described above, were and
`
`are willful and made with knowledge of Cross Country Home Services’ prior ownership and
`
`registration of the HOMESERVE marks.
`
`COUNT I
`
`(Trademark Infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1 1 14)
`
`19.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs 1-18 above are incorporated by reference.
`
`20.
`
`Cross Country Home Services owns United States Registrations numbered
`
`2,944,609, and 2,103,948 (incontestable).
`
`21.
`
`Home Service USA uses colorable imitations of Cross Country Home Services’
`
`HOMESERVE marks in commerce as its trademark, and in association with its sale and
`
`3425239
`
`., 4 ,
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS gicumentii
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 5 of 22
`
`advertisement of services similar or identical to the types of services sold by Cross Country
`
`Home Services under Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks.
`
`22.
`
`Home Service USA’s use of HOMESERVE is without permission of Cross
`
`Country Home Services and is likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive. Home Service
`
`USA is therefore liable to Cross Country Home Services for infringement under 15 U.S.C. §
`
`1114.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, such use by Home Service USA is knowing and
`
`willful and with the intent to trade off the good will established by Cross Country Home Services
`
`in its HOMESERVE marks.
`
`24.
`
`On information and belief, Homeserve plc induced Home Service USA’s
`
`infringement of the HOMESERVE marks.
`
`In addition, on information and belief, Horneserve
`
`plc controls Home Service USA’s use ofthe HOMESERVE mark. Horneserve plc is therefore
`
`contributorily and vicariously liable to Cross Country Home Services for infringement under 15
`
`U.S.C.§ H14.
`
`25.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`26.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s and Horneserve plc’s behavior will
`
`continue and will cause Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm for which there
`
`is no adequate remedy at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive
`
`relief.
`
`It is also entitled to damages for the infringement.
`
`M2623‘?!
`
`‘ 5 W
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456-PAS Document 1
`V
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`w
`
`Page 6 of 22
`
`v~
`
`(False Designation of Origin under 15 U.S.C.§ 1125(a))
`
`COUNT II
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs l-18 above are incorporated by reference.
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks are recognized for quality
`
`in the home service repair industry.
`
`29.
`
`Home Service USA provides its goods to a similar if not identical class of
`
`consumers as Cross Country Home Services in the same areas.
`
`30.
`
`Home Service USA’s use of a mark confusingly similar to Cross Country Home
`
`Services’ HOMESERVE marks has the effect of associating Home Service USA with Cross
`
`Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks in the minds of the purchasing public and of
`
`trading off the goodwill acquired by Cross Country Home Services.
`
`31.
`
`Home Service USA’s actions are likely to cause confusion or mistake, or to
`
`deceive as to the affiliation, connection or association of Home Service USA with Cross Country
`
`Home Services or as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of Home Service USA’s goods by
`
`Cross Country Home Services, entitling Cross Country Home Services to relief under 15 U.S.C.§
`
`l 125(a).
`
`32.
`
`On information and beliefi Homeserve plc induced Home Service USA’s
`
`infringement of the HOMESERVE marks and Homeserve plc controls Home Service USA’s use
`
`of the HOMESERVE mark. Homeserve plc is therefore contributorily and vicariously liable to
`
`Cross Country Home Services under 15 U.S.C. § 1l25(a).
`
`33.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`34.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s behavior will continue and will cause
`
`Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm ‘for which there is no adequate remedy
`
`mzszss»
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456—PAS
`
`{Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`
`Page 7 of 22
`
` r
`
`at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive relief.
`
`It is also entitled
`
`to damages for such false designation of origin.
`
`COUNT III
`
`(Common Law Unfair Competition)
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs l-l8, above are incorporated by reference.
`
`Cross Country Home Services owns respective rights in the HOMESERVE and
`
`HOMESERVE 24 marks at common law.
`
`37.
`
`By the above-described conduct, Home Service USA and Homeserve plc have
`
`engaged in unfair competition under common law.
`
`38.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`39.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s behavior will
`
`continue and will cause Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm for which there
`
`is no adequate remedy at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive
`
`relief.
`
`It is also entitled to damages for such conduct.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`For the above reasons, Cross Country Home Services prays that the Court declare and a
`
`judgment be entered that:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action;
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks and U.S. Registration Nos.
`
`2,944,609 and 2,103,948 are valid and subsisting and are infringed by Home Service USA;
`
`5425239
`
`, 3; ,
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv-61456—PAS iefocument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dcilset 09/12/2008
`
`Page 8 of 22
`
`'
`
`C.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc are liable to Cross Country Home
`
`Services for infringement and false designation under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, l125(a) and common
`
`law;
`
`D.
`
`Home Service USA and Ho-meserve plc have committed unfair competition under
`
`the common law;
`
`E.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc, as well as all their agents,
`
`representatives, employees, assigns and all persons acting in concert or privity with them, are
`
`permanently enjoined from maintaining, using, disseminating, reproducing, promoting,
`
`distributing or otherwise using the mark HOMESERVE or any mark confusingly similar thereto,
`
`and are permanently enjoined from using HOMESERVE as all or part of any mark, product
`
`configuration, or design;
`
`F.
`
`Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s infringement, false designation of
`
`origin and unfair competition have been willful;
`
`G.
`
`Home Service USA shall deliver to Cross Country Home Services or to the Court
`
`for destruction all materials bearing the infringing marks or colorable copies of Cross Country
`
`Home Services’ marks, and shall immediately delete all on-line usage of the HOMESERVE
`
`marks;
`
`H.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc shall file and serve a report in writing,
`
`and under oath, setting forth the manner and form in which they have complied with the Court’s
`
`order and injunction;
`
`I.
`
`Home Service USA and Horneserve plc shall pay to Cross Country Home
`
`Services any damages attributable to Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s infringement of
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks and shall account for all gains, profits, and
`
`1425239
`
`_ 3 _
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv«61456-PAS klaecument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doflkjet 09/12/2008
`
`Page 9 of 22
`
`—< ,
`
`advantages derived through that infringement (including an accounting up through the entry of
`
`injunction), and such damages authorized by law, including 15 U.S.C. § ll 17;
`
`J.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc shall pay for corrective advertising as the
`
`Court deems appropriate;
`
`K.
`
`Home Service USA and Horneserve plc shall pay Cross Country Home Services
`
`its reasonable costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 and attorneys’ fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §
`
`lll7; and,
`
`L.
`
`Cross Country Home Services be given such other and further relief as this Court
`
`may award.
`
`2425239
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`Case 0:08—cv—61456-PAS wcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`\J
`
`Page 10 of 22
`
`
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Cross Country Home Services demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable.
`
`Dated:
`
`/8’; 07038
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`FELDMAN, GALE, P.A.
`One Biscayne Tower, 30”‘ Floor
`2 South Biscayne Boulevard
`Miami, Florida 33131-4332
`Phone:
`305-358~500l
`Fax:
`305—358~3309
`
`J
`
`unn
`
`Fla. Bar. No.: 50l28l
`
`E-Mail: JMum1./cDFeldn1anGale.com
`
`Stephanie C. Alvarez
`Fla. Bar. No.: 127280
`
`E-Mail: SAlvmez@FeldmmGale.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David Wolf
`
`dwolf@wolfgreenf1eld.com
`John L. Strand
`
`jstrand@wolfgreenfield.com
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, RC.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`phone 617.646.8000
`fax 617.646.8646
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Cross Country Home Services, Inc.
`
`E42523?
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv-61456-PAS
`
`eflcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doc‘k3t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 11 of 22
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456—PAS Qcfittment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doel<‘:3’t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 12 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
`
`’ PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`The Mark shown in this certificate has been registered in the United States
`Patent and Trademark Oflce to the named registrant.
`
`The records of the United States Patent and Yiademark Oflice show that
`an application for registration ofthe Mark shown in this Certzfcate was filed in the
`Ofiice; that the application was examined and determined to be in compliance with
`the requirements ofthe law and with the regulations prescribed by the Director ofthe
`United States Patent and Yhademanlc Oflice; and that the Applicant is entitled to
`regishation ofthe Mark under the 2hza'emarkAct qf1946, awlmended.
`
`A copy of the Mark and pertinent data from the application are part of
`this certificate.
`
`the owner of the
`To avoid CANCELLATION of the registration,
`registration must submit a declaration of continued use or excusable non-use
`between tltefiflh and sixth years after the registration date. (See nextpagefor more
`infonnation.) Assuming such a declaration is properly filed, the registration will
`remain inforcefor ten (10) years, unless terminated by an order ofthe Commissioner
`for Trademarks or a federal court. (See next page firr information on maintenance
`requirementsfin‘ successive ten-yearperiods.)
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`.__Case O:O8—cv~61456-PAS ®)cu_ment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD D$tAQ9/12/2008
`
`Page ‘I3 of 22
`
`
`
`Int. CL: 37 '
`
`Prior U.S. Cls.: 100, 103, and 106
`
`Reg. No. 2,944,609 .
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Regktemi Apr..26, 2005
`
`SERVICE MARK
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`HOMESERVE
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC. (DE-
`LAWARE CORPORATION)
`1625 NW l36'l'H AVENUE. #100
`FT. LAUDERDALE. FL 33323
`
`FOR: HOME MAINTENANCE REPAIR SERVICES
`PROVIDED THROUGH A NETWORK OF SELEC-
`TED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, IN CLASS 37
`(US. CLS. 100. 103 AND 106).
`
`FIRST USE M-I999; IN COMMERCE I-I-1999.
`
`OWNER OF U.S. REG. NO. 2.l03.948.
`
`SN '76-S33.6}6. FILED 7-30-2003.
`
`BRIAN BROWN, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456—PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dockgt 09/12/2008
`
`Page 14 of 22
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`Case 0:O8—cv—61456—PAS
`
`Qofiument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`5)
`
`Page 15 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`2
`
`The Markshown tnthis certgficate has been registeredin the UnitedStates
`Patent and Ilmdemarlt Ojffice to the named registrant.
`
`The records ofthe United States Patent and Iiademark Oflice show that
`
`an applicationfor registmtion ofthe Mark shown in this Cettiflcate wasfiled in the
`
`Ofiice, that the application was examined and determinedto be in compliance with
`the requirements Qfthe law and with the regnlatianspreecribed by the Cbmmission er
`
`ofPatents and Thademarlts, and that the Applicant is entitled to registration of the
`
`Mark under the Thtdemarlt Act of1946, as Amended.
`
`A copy of the Mark and pertinent data from the application are a part of
`
`this certificate.
`
`This registration shall remain in force for TEN (10) years, unless .
`
`terminated earlier as provided by law, andsubject to compliance with theprovisions
`
`ofSection 8 ofthe 1}'ademarkAct of1946, as Amended.
`
`Commissioner of Patents and 'n'adcmarks
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS Qcyument 1
`i
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket O9/12/2008
`J
`
`Page 16 of 22
`
`‘
`
`Int. CL: 37
`
`Prior U.S. Cls.: 100, 103; and 106
`
`A Reg. No. 2,103,948
`United States Patent and Trademark.Office
`Registered Oct. 7, 1991
`
`SERVICE MARK
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`HOMESERVE 24
`
`I0—O-I995;
`
`FIRST USE
`I0‘-0-I995.
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE
`RIGHT TO USE “24", APART FROM 'I’I'lE
`MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`IN COMMERCE .
`
`SN 74—7I7.065. FILED 8-f7-1995.
`
`KAREN KUHLKE. EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`CROSS COUNTRY GROUP, INC... THE (MASSA-
`CHUSETTS CORPORATION)
`4040 MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY
`BOSTON, MA 02155
`
`I’-‘OR: HOME MAINTENANCE REPAIR SERV~
`ICES PROVIDED THROUGH A NETWORK OF
`SELECTED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
`IN CLASS‘ 37 (US. CLS. I00. 103 AND 106).
`
`‘"Q.‘5ZZ..'—a.»~«......"‘".'..-a-v
`
`
`
`Case O:08~cv—61456—PAS f‘EI)/ocument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock, t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 17 of 22
`
`—
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO.
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES,
`» INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`HOME SERVICE USA CORR, and
`HOMESERVE PLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM AND ADDRESS OF COUNSEL FOR
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES INC.
`
`Janet T. Munn, Esq., of Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Counsel for Plaintiff,
`
`Cross County Home Services,
`
`Inc., hereby gives notice of her change of firm and
`
`address. Counsel is now with the firm of Feldman Gale, RA. The address for her new
`
`firm is: Feldman Gale, P.A., One Biscayne Tower, 30"‘ Floor, 2 South Biscayne Blvd.,
`
`Miami, FL 33131.
`
`Her new email address is imunnfcbfeldmangalecom. Her direct
`
`dial
`
`is 305.397.0798 and her telecopy number is 305.358.3309. Undersigned counsel
`
`respectfully requests that the Court change its records to reflect counsel’s new contact
`
`information and that all papers served in this matter be served on counsel at her new
`
`address.
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS Qgcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t09/12/2008
`
`Page 18 of 22
`
`CASE NO.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` anet T. Munn, Esq.
`
`unn
`
`feldman a1e.com
`
`Feldman Gale, P.A.
`One Biscayne Tower, 30"’ FL
`2 South Biscayne Blvd.
`Miami, FL 33131
`Tel. 305.397.0798
`Fax No. 305.358.3309.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456-PAS
`
`egmment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dockei 09/12/2008
`
`Page 19 of 22
`
`% A0 l20 (Rev. 3/04
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. BOX 1450
`Alexandria. VA 223134450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § ll16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`Southern Dlstnct of Honda
`on the following G Patents or
`G Trademarks:
`filed in the U.S, District Court
`
`Us’ DISTRICT COUR%outhern District of Florida
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
`DATE F”9W2/2008
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TR}:gg*A"ER%RNO
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT on TRADEMARK
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`4/26/2004
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Reg. No. 2103.948
`10/7/1997
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`——
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above-—entiIled case, the following patent(s)/ tradernarl<(s) have been included:
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`G Amendment
`
`G Answer
`
`G Cross Bill
`
`G Other Pleadin;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E—
`
`I ——
`
`——
` ——
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`In the above-—-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent (8), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-Case file copy
`
`
`
`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456-PAS
`
`oczument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doci<eJt§O9/12/2008
`
`Page 20 of 22
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria. VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
` on the following G Patents orSouthern District of Florida G Trademarks:
`
`tiled in the US. District Court
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`DEFENDANT
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
` PLAINTIFF
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`2 Reg. No. 2,103,948
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`4/26/2004 7
`10/7/1997
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`G Amendment
`
`G Other Pleadin
`G Cross Bill
`G Answer
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1-Upon initiation of action. mail this copy to Director Copy 3-«Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Ccpy 2~—Upon filing document adding patent{s}. mail this copy is Director Copy 4»-=Case file copy
`
`
`
`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t09/12/2008
`
`Page 21 of 22
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223134450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
` on the following G Patents orSouthern District of Home G Trademarks:
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`
`PLAINTIFF
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`DEFENDANT
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`2 Reg. No. 2,103,9