throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA261249
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`01/19/2009
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92049928
`Defendant
`Homeserve plc
`Brian P. O'Donnell
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`UNITED STATES
`Motion to Suspend for Civil Action
`Brian P. O'Donnell
`bodonnell@morganlewis.com, trademarks@morganlewis.com
`/Brian P. O'Donnell/
`01/19/2009
`Motion to Suspend.PDF ( 75 pages )(3797548 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of Registration No. 3,224,227
`Issued: April 3, 2007
`Mark: HOME SERVICE USA Plus Design
`
`In the matter of Registration No. 2,969,200
`Issued: July 19, 2005
`Mark: HOME SERVICE Plus Design
`
`Consolidated Cancellation No.: 92049928
`
`Filed: September 12, 2008
`
`) ) ) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME
`
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`vs.
`
`HOMESERVE PLC
`
`Respondent.
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND CONSOLIDATED CANCELLATION PROCEEDING
`AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF
`
`Pursuant to T.B.M.P. § 5l0.02(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 2.1 l7(a), Respondent Homeserve plc
`
`(“Respondent”), by and through counsel Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, hereby respectfully
`
`requests suspension of Consolidated Cancellation No. 92049928 (“Cancellation Proceeding”)
`
`filed by Petitioner Cross Country Home Services, Inc. (“Petitioner”) pending resolution of the
`
`civil action pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida,
`
`styled Cross Country Home Services, Inc. v. Homeserve plc and Home Services USA
`
`Corporation, Civil Action No. 08-CV-61456 (hereinafter the “Civil Action”).
`
`I.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Petitioner filed its Consolidated Petition to Cancel (“Petition”) on September l2, 2008
`
`against Respondent’s Reg. No. 2,969,200 for the mark HOME SERVICE Plus Design and Reg.
`
`No. 3,224,227 for the mark HOME SERVICE USA Plus Design, both for use in connection with
`
`insurance services, namely insurance for maintenance and repair services relating to utilities, gas
`
`boilers, household appliances and installations, plumbing services, electrical services; and the
`
`

`
`installation, maintenance and repair services relating to utilities and household appliances and
`
`installations; plumbing services, electrical services.
`
`As grounds for cancellation, Petitioner has asserted genericness and a likelihood of
`
`confusion with its alleged marks HOMESERVE and HOMESERVE 24 (collectively, the
`
`“HOMESERVE marks”). As a basis for its likelihood of confusion claim, Petitioner alleged
`
`rights in the HOMESERVE marks arising from common law and federal registration (namely,
`
`Reg. No. 2,944,609 for HOMESERVE and Reg. No. 2,103,948 for HOMESERVE 24), both for
`
`use in connection with home maintenance repair services provided through a network of selected
`
`independent contractors.
`
`Concurrently with the filing of the Cancellation Proceeding, Petitioner filed the Civil
`
`Action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for federal
`
`trademark infringement and federal and common law unfair competition against Respondent and
`
`its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, Home Service USA Corporation (“HSUSA”), relating to
`
`Respondent’s alleged unlawfiil use of the mark HOMESERVE.
`
`In the Civil Action, Petitioner
`
`based its likelihood of confusion claims on rights arising from common law and the same federal
`
`registrations for the HOMESERVE marks as it asserted in this Cancellation Proceeding.‘
`
`On January 16, 2009, Respondent filed an Answer to the Civil Action denying that it
`
`infringes Petitioner’s alleged rights in the HOMESERVE marks. Respondent’s U.S. subsidiary,
`
`HSUSA, also asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non—infringement of the
`
`HOMESERVE marks under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ l 1 l4 and ll25(a), respectively.
`
`Copies of the relevant pleadings in the Civil Action are attached hereto as Exhibits l—2.
`
`1 CCHS stated in the “Related Proceedings” section of its Petition that it “has filed a lawsuit for trademark
`infringement against Registrant and its related company Home Service USA Corp. in the United States District
`Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-CV-61456.”
`
`

`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`The Board has inherent power to suspend proceedings and it has been the Board’s long-
`
`standing policy to suspend a Board action when there is a related civil action which may have a
`
`bearing on the Board proceeding. See Other Telephone Co. v. Connecticut Nat 7 Telephone Co.,
`
`Inc., 181 U.S.P.Q. 125, 126-27 (T.T.A.B. 1974); Townley Clothes, Inc. v. Goldring, Inc, 100
`
`U.S.P.Q. 57, 58 (“mt is deemed the sounder practice to suspend the [Board] proceedings
`
`pending termination of the Court action.”); 6 J. Thomas McCarthy, MCCARTHY ON
`
`TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 32:47 (4th ed. 2008) (“It is standard procedure for the
`
`Trademark Board to stay administrative proceedings pending the outcome of court litigation
`
`between the same parties involving related issues”); see also T.B.M.P. § 5l0.02(a) and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 2.1 17(a). The language of 37 CPR. § 2.1 17(a) makes plain this policy:
`
`Whenever it shall come to the attention of the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board that a party or parties to a pending case are engaged
`in a civil action or another Board proceeding which may have a
`bearing on the case, proceedings before the Board may be
`suspended until termination of the civil action or the other Board
`proceeding.
`
`Further supporting the Board’s preference for suspension is the well—settled principle that
`
`to the extent issues in common with those in a Board proceeding may be decided in a federal
`
`civil action, the federal court decision is often binding, under principles of collateral estoppel, on
`
`the Board but Board decisions are not binding on federal courts. See, e. g., Goya Foods Inc. v.
`
`Tropicana Products, Inc., 848 F.2d 848 (2d Cir. 1988); American Bakeries Co. v. Pan—0~Gola’
`
`Baking Co., 650 F. Supp. 563 (D. Minn. 1986); In re Alfred Dunhill Ltd, 224 U.S.P.Q. 501
`
`(T.T.A.B. 1984) (“A federal court determination of a trademark issue normally has a binding
`
`effect in subsequent proceedings before the Board involving the same parties and issue.”)
`
`In this case, Petitioner and Respondent are parties in both proceedings. The marks
`
`

`
`asserted by CCHS in both proceedings are identical (i.e., the HOMESERVE marks). Both
`
`proceedings also involve common issues of law because Respondent’s U.S. subsidiary, HSUSA,
`
`has counterclaimed for a declaration of non—infringement that HSUSA’s use of the HOME
`
`SERVICE marks does not infringe Petitioner’s alleged rights in its HOMESERVE marks.
`
`HSUSA’s counterclaim will necessarily be resolved by the district court’s determination on the
`
`issue of likelihood of confusion — substantially the same legal standard applied in this
`
`Cancellation Proceeding to determine Respondent’s entitlement to maintain its HOME
`
`SERVICE registrations. Accordingly, however the district court rules on likelihood of
`
`confusion, the district court’s ruling will bear on this Cancellation Proceeding. Furthermore, in
`
`resolving the Civil Action, the district court will be required to make findings regarding various
`
`factors supporting or negating a likelihood of confusion, namely the strength of the asserted
`
`HOMESERVE marks, the proximity of the parties’ services, the relatedness of the trade
`
`channels, and consumer sophistication, among other factors. Accordingly, the decision in the
`
`Civil Action will have a bearing on this Cancellation Proceeding
`
`Conservation of the parties’ resources favor suspension of this Cancellation Proceeding
`
`because it is highly likely that both proceedings will involve the production of the same, or
`
`substantially the same, documents and will require the testimony of the same witnesses.
`
`Moreover, the promotion ofjudicial economy also favor suspension of this Cancellation
`
`Proceeding because many (if not all) of the issues will be adjudicated by a single decisional
`
`body, the federal district court.
`
`In advance of the filing of this motion, Respondent sought Petitioner’s stipulation to
`
`suspend these proceedings pending disposition of the Civil Action and was refused. Petitioner
`
`did not explain the basis for its refusal to stipulate to the suspension.
`
`

`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For all of the forgoing reasons, Respondent Homeserve plc respectfully requests that the
`
`Board issue an Order suspending the Cancellation Proceeding pending the outcome of the related
`
`Civil Action.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`HOMESERVE PLC
`
`Dated: January 19, 2009
`
`
`
`
`rett 1. Miller
`Brian P. O’Donnell
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`(202) 739~3000
`(202) 739-3001 (fax)
`
`Counselfor Respondent Homeserve plc
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1, Brian P. O’Donnell, do hereby certify that on January 19, 2009 I served a true and
`
`correct copy of the foregoing MOTION TO SUSPEND CONSOLIDATED CANCELLATION
`
`PROCEEDING AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF by first class mail, postage
`
`pre-paid, and electronic mail on:
`
`David Wolf, Esq.
`John L. Strand, Esq.
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`dwolf@wolfgreenfield.com, jstrand@wolfgreenfield.co1n
`
`gas 2" 05%,, £4
`rian P. O’Donnell
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`(202) 739-3000
`(202) 739-3001 (fax)
`
`

`
`Exhibit 1
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456—PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock tO9/12/2008
`
`Page 1 of 22
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO. :
`
`08-CV-61456-Seitz-O'Su|livan
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES,
`INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`HOME SERVICE USA CORR, a Florida
`
`corporation and
`HOMESERVE PLC, a foreign
`
`corporation
`
`Defendants.
`
`/
`
`FlLEDby VT o.c.
`ELECTRONIC
`
`SEPT. 12, 2008
`
`srsvsw M. uxmmom-:
`CLERK u.s. msr. c7.
`s.o. or FLA.-MIAMI
`
`COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
`
`Cross Country Home Services, Inc. (“Cross Country Home Services”) brings this civil
`
`action against Home Service USA Corp. (“Home Service USA”) and Homeserve plc.
`
`NATURE OF ACTION
`
`l.
`
`Cross Country Home Services contends Home Service USA infringes its federally
`
`registered trademarks HOMESERVE and HOMESERVE 24 by using “Homeserve plc” as a
`
`mark in promoting identical services in the same trading areas previously established by Cross
`
`Country Home Services. Home Services USA’s infringement is apparently controlled and
`
`abetted by its United Kingdom parent Homeserve plc.
`
`PLAINTIFF CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff, Cross Country Home Services, is a Delaware corporation with its
`
`principal place of business at 1625 NW 136th Avenue, Suite 200, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33323.
`
`1of22
`
`

`
`08—6eVe-6:tM5/6>4$@Il>zeO'ScLdli|i.vram Entered on FLSD Dock tO9/12/2008
`V
`
`Page 2 of 22
`
`Plaintiff has been engaged in the business of administering various home protection and repair
`
`services since 1988.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff owns a number of United States trademark registrations, including for the
`
`marks HOMESERVE (U.S. Reg. No. 2,944,609; registered April 26, 2004) for home
`
`maintenance repair services provided through a network of selected independent contractors;
`
`and, HOMESERVE 24 (U.S. Reg. No. 2,103,948; registered Oct. 7, 1997) for home maintenance
`
`repair services provided through a network of selected independent contractors (the
`
`“HOMESERVE marks”). The registrations for the HOMESERVE marks are in full force and
`
`effect. The registration for HOMESERVE 24 is incontestable. Copies of these registrations are
`
`attached to this Complaint as Exhibits A and B.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff also owns rights in the HOMESERVE marks at common law.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Home Service USA, is a Florida corporation whose principal place
`
`of business is at 5301 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 400, Miami, FL 33126.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant I-Iomeserve plc is a U.K. corporation having its principal place of
`
`business at Cable Dr., Walsall, West Midlands WS2 7BN, England.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`7.
`
`This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition arising under
`
`the laws of the United States, namely the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. Therefore, this
`
`Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. This Court has supplemental
`
`jurisdiction over Cross Country Home Services’ state—law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367 in
`
`that the state law claim is integrally related to the Federal claim and arises from a common
`
`3426239
`
`2 M22
`
`_ 2 __
`
`

`
`08-edele-6:3815&‘l$£il>Z£i‘S’cldi1iitVl8|l1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 3 of 22
`
`nucleus of operative facts such that the administration of such claims herein is in the interest of
`
`judicial economy.
`
`8.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Home Service USA, which is a citizen
`
`of Florida and a resident of Miami, Florida. This Court has personal jurisdiction over
`
`Homeserve plc pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 48. l 93(b) because Homeserve plc committed tortious acts
`
`of trademark infringement and unfair competition in Florida.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because at least a
`
`substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims of this complaint took place in this judicial
`
`district because Cross Country Home Services is based in this district as is Home Services USA.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`10.
`
`Defendant Homeserve plc, a company based in United Kingdom, formed the
`
`Home Service USA Corp., as a subsidiary corporation in the United States. Homeserve plc uses
`
`the mark HOMESERVE in the U.K. for services identical to those offered by Home Service
`
`USA in the U.S.
`
`11.
`
`Home Service USA offers nearly identical services as Cross Country Home
`
`Services in identical or overlapping trading areas under and in connection with the infringing
`
`mark HOMESERVE. This use is exemplified on Home Service USA’s website and marketing
`
`materials which display the following use of the mark HOMESERVE:
`
`Home Service A
`
`USA
`
`or Homeserve pl:
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Horneserve plc has authority over Home Service
`
`USA’s transactions, including Home Service USA’s uses of the mark HOMESERVE.
`
`$426239
`
`3of22
`
`_ 3 _,
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456-PAS
`
`egcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 4 of 22
`
`13.
`
`These activities occurred notwithstanding Home Service USA’s and Horneserve
`
`plc’s knowledge of the longtime use, ownership and registration of the I-IOMESERVE marks by
`
`Cross Country Home Services in the United States.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, Home Service USA adopted and uses the mark
`
`HOMESERVE at the direction of Homeserve plc, despite their knowledge of the longtime use,
`
`Ownership and registration of the HOMESERVE marks by Cross Country Home Services.
`
`15.
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ common law and registered rights in the
`
`HOMESERVE marks pre-date Home Service USA’s use of HOMESERVE.
`
`16.
`
`Cross Country Home Services placed Home Service USA on actual notice of the
`
`similarity and likelihood of confusion between Home Service USA’s uses of HOMESERVE and
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks.
`
`17.
`
`Home Service USA willfully disregarded Cross Country Home Services" rights
`
`and continued to use HOMESERVE in interstate commerce.
`
`18.
`
`The acts of Home Service USA and Homeserve plc, as described above, were and
`
`are willful and made with knowledge of Cross Country Home Services’ prior ownership and
`
`registration of the HOMESERVE marks.
`
`COUNT I
`
`(Trademark Infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1 1 14)
`
`19.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs 1-18 above are incorporated by reference.
`
`20.
`
`Cross Country Home Services owns United States Registrations numbered
`
`2,944,609, and 2,103,948 (incontestable).
`
`21.
`
`Home Service USA uses colorable imitations of Cross Country Home Services’
`
`HOMESERVE marks in commerce as its trademark, and in association with its sale and
`
`3425239
`
`., 4 ,
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS gicumentii
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 5 of 22
`
`advertisement of services similar or identical to the types of services sold by Cross Country
`
`Home Services under Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks.
`
`22.
`
`Home Service USA’s use of HOMESERVE is without permission of Cross
`
`Country Home Services and is likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive. Home Service
`
`USA is therefore liable to Cross Country Home Services for infringement under 15 U.S.C. §
`
`1114.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, such use by Home Service USA is knowing and
`
`willful and with the intent to trade off the good will established by Cross Country Home Services
`
`in its HOMESERVE marks.
`
`24.
`
`On information and belief, Homeserve plc induced Home Service USA’s
`
`infringement of the HOMESERVE marks.
`
`In addition, on information and belief, Horneserve
`
`plc controls Home Service USA’s use ofthe HOMESERVE mark. Horneserve plc is therefore
`
`contributorily and vicariously liable to Cross Country Home Services for infringement under 15
`
`U.S.C.§ H14.
`
`25.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`26.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s and Horneserve plc’s behavior will
`
`continue and will cause Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm for which there
`
`is no adequate remedy at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive
`
`relief.
`
`It is also entitled to damages for the infringement.
`
`M2623‘?!
`
`‘ 5 W
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456-PAS Document 1
`V
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`w
`
`Page 6 of 22
`
`v~
`
`(False Designation of Origin under 15 U.S.C.§ 1125(a))
`
`COUNT II
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs l-18 above are incorporated by reference.
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks are recognized for quality
`
`in the home service repair industry.
`
`29.
`
`Home Service USA provides its goods to a similar if not identical class of
`
`consumers as Cross Country Home Services in the same areas.
`
`30.
`
`Home Service USA’s use of a mark confusingly similar to Cross Country Home
`
`Services’ HOMESERVE marks has the effect of associating Home Service USA with Cross
`
`Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks in the minds of the purchasing public and of
`
`trading off the goodwill acquired by Cross Country Home Services.
`
`31.
`
`Home Service USA’s actions are likely to cause confusion or mistake, or to
`
`deceive as to the affiliation, connection or association of Home Service USA with Cross Country
`
`Home Services or as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of Home Service USA’s goods by
`
`Cross Country Home Services, entitling Cross Country Home Services to relief under 15 U.S.C.§
`
`l 125(a).
`
`32.
`
`On information and beliefi Homeserve plc induced Home Service USA’s
`
`infringement of the HOMESERVE marks and Homeserve plc controls Home Service USA’s use
`
`of the HOMESERVE mark. Homeserve plc is therefore contributorily and vicariously liable to
`
`Cross Country Home Services under 15 U.S.C. § 1l25(a).
`
`33.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`34.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s behavior will continue and will cause
`
`Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm ‘for which there is no adequate remedy
`
`mzszss»
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv—61456—PAS
`
`{Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`
`Page 7 of 22
`
` r
`
`at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive relief.
`
`It is also entitled
`
`to damages for such false designation of origin.
`
`COUNT III
`
`(Common Law Unfair Competition)
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`The allegations of Paragraphs l-l8, above are incorporated by reference.
`
`Cross Country Home Services owns respective rights in the HOMESERVE and
`
`HOMESERVE 24 marks at common law.
`
`37.
`
`By the above-described conduct, Home Service USA and Homeserve plc have
`
`engaged in unfair competition under common law.
`
`38.
`
`Cross Country Home Services has been damaged by such conduct in an amount to
`
`be determined at trial.
`
`39.
`
`Unless enjoined, Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s behavior will
`
`continue and will cause Cross Country Home Services to suffer irreparable harm for which there
`
`is no adequate remedy at law. Therefore, Cross Country Home Services is entitled to injunctive
`
`relief.
`
`It is also entitled to damages for such conduct.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`For the above reasons, Cross Country Home Services prays that the Court declare and a
`
`judgment be entered that:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action;
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks and U.S. Registration Nos.
`
`2,944,609 and 2,103,948 are valid and subsisting and are infringed by Home Service USA;
`
`5425239
`
`, 3; ,
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv-61456—PAS iefocument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dcilset 09/12/2008
`
`Page 8 of 22
`
`'
`
`C.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc are liable to Cross Country Home
`
`Services for infringement and false designation under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, l125(a) and common
`
`law;
`
`D.
`
`Home Service USA and Ho-meserve plc have committed unfair competition under
`
`the common law;
`
`E.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc, as well as all their agents,
`
`representatives, employees, assigns and all persons acting in concert or privity with them, are
`
`permanently enjoined from maintaining, using, disseminating, reproducing, promoting,
`
`distributing or otherwise using the mark HOMESERVE or any mark confusingly similar thereto,
`
`and are permanently enjoined from using HOMESERVE as all or part of any mark, product
`
`configuration, or design;
`
`F.
`
`Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s infringement, false designation of
`
`origin and unfair competition have been willful;
`
`G.
`
`Home Service USA shall deliver to Cross Country Home Services or to the Court
`
`for destruction all materials bearing the infringing marks or colorable copies of Cross Country
`
`Home Services’ marks, and shall immediately delete all on-line usage of the HOMESERVE
`
`marks;
`
`H.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc shall file and serve a report in writing,
`
`and under oath, setting forth the manner and form in which they have complied with the Court’s
`
`order and injunction;
`
`I.
`
`Home Service USA and Horneserve plc shall pay to Cross Country Home
`
`Services any damages attributable to Home Service USA’s and Homeserve plc’s infringement of
`
`Cross Country Home Services’ HOMESERVE marks and shall account for all gains, profits, and
`
`1425239
`
`_ 3 _
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv«61456-PAS klaecument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doflkjet 09/12/2008
`
`Page 9 of 22
`
`—< ,
`
`advantages derived through that infringement (including an accounting up through the entry of
`
`injunction), and such damages authorized by law, including 15 U.S.C. § ll 17;
`
`J.
`
`Home Service USA and Homeserve plc shall pay for corrective advertising as the
`
`Court deems appropriate;
`
`K.
`
`Home Service USA and Horneserve plc shall pay Cross Country Home Services
`
`its reasonable costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 and attorneys’ fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §
`
`lll7; and,
`
`L.
`
`Cross Country Home Services be given such other and further relief as this Court
`
`may award.
`
`2425239
`
`- 9 -
`
`

`
`Case 0:08—cv—61456-PAS wcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`\J
`
`Page 10 of 22
`
`
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Cross Country Home Services demands a trial by jury of all issues so triable.
`
`Dated:
`
`/8’; 07038
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`FELDMAN, GALE, P.A.
`One Biscayne Tower, 30”‘ Floor
`2 South Biscayne Boulevard
`Miami, Florida 33131-4332
`Phone:
`305-358~500l
`Fax:
`305—358~3309
`
`J
`
`unn
`
`Fla. Bar. No.: 50l28l
`
`E-Mail: JMum1./cDFeldn1anGale.com
`
`Stephanie C. Alvarez
`Fla. Bar. No.: 127280
`
`E-Mail: SAlvmez@FeldmmGale.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David Wolf
`
`dwolf@wolfgreenf1eld.com
`John L. Strand
`
`jstrand@wolfgreenfield.com
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS, RC.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`phone 617.646.8000
`fax 617.646.8646
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Cross Country Home Services, Inc.
`
`E42523?
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv-61456-PAS
`
`eflcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doc‘k3t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 11 of 22
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456—PAS Qcfittment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doel<‘:3’t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 12 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
`
`’ PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`The Mark shown in this certificate has been registered in the United States
`Patent and Trademark Oflce to the named registrant.
`
`The records of the United States Patent and Yiademark Oflice show that
`an application for registration ofthe Mark shown in this Certzfcate was filed in the
`Ofiice; that the application was examined and determined to be in compliance with
`the requirements ofthe law and with the regulations prescribed by the Director ofthe
`United States Patent and Yhademanlc Oflice; and that the Applicant is entitled to
`regishation ofthe Mark under the 2hza'emarkAct qf1946, awlmended.
`
`A copy of the Mark and pertinent data from the application are part of
`this certificate.
`
`the owner of the
`To avoid CANCELLATION of the registration,
`registration must submit a declaration of continued use or excusable non-use
`between tltefiflh and sixth years after the registration date. (See nextpagefor more
`infonnation.) Assuming such a declaration is properly filed, the registration will
`remain inforcefor ten (10) years, unless terminated by an order ofthe Commissioner
`for Trademarks or a federal court. (See next page firr information on maintenance
`requirementsfin‘ successive ten-yearperiods.)
`
`
`
`I
`
`

`
`.__Case O:O8—cv~61456-PAS ®)cu_ment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD D$tAQ9/12/2008
`
`Page ‘I3 of 22
`
`
`
`Int. CL: 37 '
`
`Prior U.S. Cls.: 100, 103, and 106
`
`Reg. No. 2,944,609 .
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Regktemi Apr..26, 2005
`
`SERVICE MARK
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`HOMESERVE
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC. (DE-
`LAWARE CORPORATION)
`1625 NW l36'l'H AVENUE. #100
`FT. LAUDERDALE. FL 33323
`
`FOR: HOME MAINTENANCE REPAIR SERVICES
`PROVIDED THROUGH A NETWORK OF SELEC-
`TED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, IN CLASS 37
`(US. CLS. 100. 103 AND 106).
`
`FIRST USE M-I999; IN COMMERCE I-I-1999.
`
`OWNER OF U.S. REG. NO. 2.l03.948.
`
`SN '76-S33.6}6. FILED 7-30-2003.
`
`BRIAN BROWN, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456—PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dockgt 09/12/2008
`
`Page 14 of 22
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`
`Case 0:O8—cv—61456—PAS
`
`Qofiument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 09/12/2008
`5)
`
`Page 15 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`2
`
`The Markshown tnthis certgficate has been registeredin the UnitedStates
`Patent and Ilmdemarlt Ojffice to the named registrant.
`
`The records ofthe United States Patent and Iiademark Oflice show that
`
`an applicationfor registmtion ofthe Mark shown in this Cettiflcate wasfiled in the
`
`Ofiice, that the application was examined and determinedto be in compliance with
`the requirements Qfthe law and with the regnlatianspreecribed by the Cbmmission er
`
`ofPatents and Thademarlts, and that the Applicant is entitled to registration of the
`
`Mark under the Thtdemarlt Act of1946, as Amended.
`
`A copy of the Mark and pertinent data from the application are a part of
`
`this certificate.
`
`This registration shall remain in force for TEN (10) years, unless .
`
`terminated earlier as provided by law, andsubject to compliance with theprovisions
`
`ofSection 8 ofthe 1}'ademarkAct of1946, as Amended.
`
`Commissioner of Patents and 'n'adcmarks
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS Qcyument 1
`i
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket O9/12/2008
`J
`
`Page 16 of 22
`
`‘
`
`Int. CL: 37
`
`Prior U.S. Cls.: 100, 103; and 106
`
`A Reg. No. 2,103,948
`United States Patent and Trademark.Office
`Registered Oct. 7, 1991
`
`SERVICE MARK
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`HOMESERVE 24
`
`I0—O-I995;
`
`FIRST USE
`I0‘-0-I995.
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE
`RIGHT TO USE “24", APART FROM 'I’I'lE
`MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`IN COMMERCE .
`
`SN 74—7I7.065. FILED 8-f7-1995.
`
`KAREN KUHLKE. EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`CROSS COUNTRY GROUP, INC... THE (MASSA-
`CHUSETTS CORPORATION)
`4040 MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY
`BOSTON, MA 02155
`
`I’-‘OR: HOME MAINTENANCE REPAIR SERV~
`ICES PROVIDED THROUGH A NETWORK OF
`SELECTED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
`IN CLASS‘ 37 (US. CLS. I00. 103 AND 106).
`
`‘"Q.‘5ZZ..'—a.»~«......"‘".'..-a-v
`
`

`
`Case O:08~cv—61456—PAS f‘EI)/ocument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock, t 09/12/2008
`
`Page 17 of 22
`
`—
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO.
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES,
`» INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`HOME SERVICE USA CORR, and
`HOMESERVE PLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM AND ADDRESS OF COUNSEL FOR
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES INC.
`
`Janet T. Munn, Esq., of Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Counsel for Plaintiff,
`
`Cross County Home Services,
`
`Inc., hereby gives notice of her change of firm and
`
`address. Counsel is now with the firm of Feldman Gale, RA. The address for her new
`
`firm is: Feldman Gale, P.A., One Biscayne Tower, 30"‘ Floor, 2 South Biscayne Blvd.,
`
`Miami, FL 33131.
`
`Her new email address is imunnfcbfeldmangalecom. Her direct
`
`dial
`
`is 305.397.0798 and her telecopy number is 305.358.3309. Undersigned counsel
`
`respectfully requests that the Court change its records to reflect counsel’s new contact
`
`information and that all papers served in this matter be served on counsel at her new
`
`address.
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS Qgcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t09/12/2008
`
`Page 18 of 22
`
`CASE NO.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` anet T. Munn, Esq.
`
`unn
`
`feldman a1e.com
`
`Feldman Gale, P.A.
`One Biscayne Tower, 30"’ FL
`2 South Biscayne Blvd.
`Miami, FL 33131
`Tel. 305.397.0798
`Fax No. 305.358.3309.
`
`Dated:
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456-PAS
`
`egmment 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dockei 09/12/2008
`
`Page 19 of 22
`
`% A0 l20 (Rev. 3/04
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. BOX 1450
`Alexandria. VA 223134450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § ll16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`Southern Dlstnct of Honda
`on the following G Patents or
`G Trademarks:
`filed in the U.S, District Court
`
`Us’ DISTRICT COUR%outhern District of Florida
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
`DATE F”9W2/2008
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TR}:gg*A"ER%RNO
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`
`
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT on TRADEMARK
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`4/26/2004
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Reg. No. 2103.948
`10/7/1997
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`——
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above-—entiIled case, the following patent(s)/ tradernarl<(s) have been included:
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`G Amendment
`
`G Answer
`
`G Cross Bill
`
`G Other Pleadin;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E—
`
`I ——
`
`——
` ——
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`In the above-—-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent (8), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-Case file copy
`
`
`

`
`Case O:O8—cv—61456-PAS
`
`oczument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Doci<eJt§O9/12/2008
`
`Page 20 of 22
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria. VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
` on the following G Patents orSouthern District of Florida G Trademarks:
`
`tiled in the US. District Court
`
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`DEFENDANT
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
` PLAINTIFF
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`2 Reg. No. 2,103,948
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`4/26/2004 7
`10/7/1997
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`G Amendment
`
`G Other Pleadin
`G Cross Bill
`G Answer
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1-Upon initiation of action. mail this copy to Director Copy 3-«Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Ccpy 2~—Upon filing document adding patent{s}. mail this copy is Director Copy 4»-=Case file copy
`
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv-61456-PAS gcument 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Dock t09/12/2008
`
`Page 21 of 22
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223134450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
` on the following G Patents orSouthern District of Home G Trademarks:
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`
`PLAINTIFF
`CROSS COUNTRY HOME SERVICES, INC.
`
`DEFENDANT
`HOME SERVICES USA CORP. and HOMESERV PLC
`
`1 Reg. No. 2,944,609
`2 Reg. No. 2,103,9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket