Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA303736
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`08/31/2009
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92045101
`Plaintiff
`IMAGEWEAR APPAREL CORP.
`Paul J. Kennedy
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`3000 Two Logan Square, Eighteenth and Arch Streets
`Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
`UNITED STATES
`KennedyP@Pepperlaw.com
`Opposition/Response to Motion
`Paul J. Kennedy
`kennedyp@pepperlaw.com, lovensheimera@pepperlaw.com,
`mulligar@pepperlaw.com, catalant@pepperlaw.com
`/Paul J. Kennedy/
`08/31/2009
`PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
`STRIKE.PDF ( 9 pages )(121838 bytes )
`EXHIBIT 1 TO PETITIONER'S MEMO OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION
`TO STRIKE.PDF ( 26 pages )(823426 bytes )
`EXHIBIT 2 (PART I) TO PETITIONER'S MEMO OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
`MOTION TO STRIKE.PDF ( 76 pages )(2098960 bytes )
`EXHIBIT 2 (PART II) TO PETITIONER'S MEMO OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
`MOTION TO STRIKE.PDF ( 65 pages )(1827681 bytes )
`
`

`
`#$%&'(%)$#&(*%+&,&(+%-,&($&%,$*%&.,*(/,.0%122#3(
`4(21.(%&'(%&.,*(/,.0%&.#,5%,$*%,--(,5%41,.*
`
`##########################################
`$%&'()(&*+&,,&*(-+./*,0
`
`,2343456278
`
`C0
`
`)$<'D+%&<EF&.GE*$<'+./*,0
`
`1
`*2H4I37963K*2IL56M2630
`##########################################1
`
`-(&#&#1$(.6+%/(/1.,$*)/%12%5,7%#$%1--1+#&#1$%&1
`.(+-1$*($&6+%/1&#1$%&1%+&.#0(%-(&#&#1$(.6+%/(/1.,$*)/%12%5,7
`#$%1--1+#&#1$%&1%.(+-1$*($&6+%/1&#1$%21.%+)//,.8%9)*:/($&%,$*
`#$%+)--1.&%12%-(&#&#1$(.6+%3.1++;/1&#1$%21.%+)//,.8%9)*:/($&
`
`,2343456278+$N9H2O297+&LL972;+.57L0+PQ,234345627RS8+3T75UHT+43I+U6M27I4H62M+
`
`:5U6I2;8+T272VW+IUVN43I+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+5Y+-9O+46+/LL5I43456+35+*2IL56M263XI+
`
`%53456+35+D374Z2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+46+/LL5I43456+35+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+Y57+DUNN97W+
`
`[UMHN263+96M+46+DULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456+Y57+DUNN97W+[UMHN263+PQ,234345627XI+
`
`%2N5796MUNRS0++F57+9;;+5Y+3T2+Y5;;5O46H+729I56I8+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+IT5U;M+V2+M2642M0
`
`,<
`
`-=>?>?@A=B6C%/=D@BEAFGD%3@DHI?=C%7?>J%&BEF=DEBK%.GI=%L<MLNOEP
`
`*2IL56M2638+)46HI+%96UY9:3U746H+.57L0+PQ*2IL56M263RS8 T9I+Y4;2M+3T2+L72I263+
`
`N53456+46+96+9332NL3+35+M4C273+933263456+56+9+LU7L5732M+4IIU2+46+9+V9I2;2II+9332NL3+35+I2:U72+9+
`
`IUNN97W+]UMHN263+O43T5U3+T9C46H+3T2+^597MXI+:56I4M2793456+5Y+3T2+N2743I0++*2IL56M263XI+
`
`N53456+Y94;I+V2:9UI2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+M52I8+46+Y9:38+:5NL;W+O43T+3T2+9LL75L74932+L9H2+
`
`;4N43I+Y57+9+:5NV462M+5LL5I43456+96M+:75II¥N53456+N2N5796MUN+5Y+;9O+U6M27+G79M2N97Z+
`
`*U;2 >0B>_P9S0++,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+:5NL74I2I+3O5+M4YY27263+L;29M46HI8+29:T+5Y+OT4:T+
`
`9MM72II2I+M4YY27263+4IIU2I1++PBS+9+72IL56I2+35+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+Y57+DUNN97W+[UMHN263+
`
`PQ*2IL56M263XI+%53456RS+96M+P>S+9+N2N5796MUN+46+IULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456+Y57+
`
`.96:2;;93456+<50++=>?@AB?B
`
`*2H4I3793456+<50++>8==A8B=J
`
`11
`
`1
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`
`DUNN97W+[UMHN263+PQ,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456RS0++&::57M46H;W8+,234345627+T9I+:5NL;42M+O43T+
`Summary Judgment (“Petitioner’s Cross-Motion”). Accordingly, Petitioner has complied with
`
`3T2+7U;2I+96M+9I+9+72IU;38+3T2+^597M+IT5U;M+M26W+*2IL56M263XI+N534560
`the rules and as a result, the Board should deny Respondent’s motion.
`
`,U7IU963+35+J_+.0F0*0+`>0B>_P9S8+Qa3bT2+V742Y+46+IULL573+5Y+9+N53456+96M+3T2+V742Y+
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.127(a), “[t]he brief in support of a motion and the brief
`
`46+72IL56I2+35+3T2+N53456+IT9;;+653+2c:22M+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I+46+;26H3T8+96M+9+72L;W+V742Y+IT9;;+653+
`in response to the motion shall not exceed twenty-five pages in length, and a reply brief shall not
`
`2c:22M+326+L9H2I+46+;26H3T0R++GT272Y5728+I46:2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+:5NL74I2I+V53T+9+V742Y+
`exceed ten pages in length.” Therefore, since Petitioner’s Memorandum comprises both a brief
`
`46+72IL56I2+EAF+9+V742Y+46+IULL573+5Y+3T2+72IL2:34C2+L97342IX+N53456I+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN2638+
`in response 1 a brief in support of the respective parties’ motions for summary judgment,
`
`,234345627+O9I+L75L27;W+26343;2M+35+9+:5NV462M+3539;+5Y+Y4Y3W+PA?S+L9H2I+d+35+V2+UI2M+46+243T27+3O5+
`Petitioner was properly entitled to a combined total of fifty (50) pages — to be used in either two
`
`I2L97932+V742YI+57+46+562+:5NV462M+V742Y+d+3T2+J>¥L9H2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+Y9;;I+O2;;+
`separate briefs or in one combined brief — the 32-page Petitioner’s Memorandum falls well
`
`O43T46+3T2+3539;+:5NV462M+L9H2+;4N43+5Y+Y4Y3W+PA?S+L9H2I0++#$$%$&'& ())*$+%,$-./)0)'1$2%
`within the total combined page limit of fifty (50) pages. See e.g. Cooper Technologies
`
`()3*4/5 6&%7$/1$+%80$-9+1-%()&:%;/-&8+e=+E0D0,0f0>M+B@_e8+B@_=8+60+>0+PGG&^+>??eS+P65346H+3T93+
`Company v. Denier Electric Co., Inc., 89 U.S.P.Q.2d 1478, 1479, n. 2. (TTAB 2008) (noting that
`
`9+L973W+9MM72II46H+M4YY27263+4IIU2I+46+96+5LL5I43456K:75II+N53456+Q:5U;M+L27N4II4V;W+Y4;2+9+V742Y+46+
`a party addressing different issues in an opposition/cross motion “could perrnissibly file a brief in
`
`5LL5I43456+35+3T2+574H469;+N53456+96M+9+V742Y+46+IULL573+5Y+3T2+:75II¥N534568+96M+V2:9UI2+3T2W+
`opposition to the original motion and a brief in support of the cross-motion, and because they
`
`O5U;M+653+V2+9MM72II46H+3T2+I9N2+4IIU28+29:T+:5U;M+V2+>A+L9H2I8+<.$9.$+%9.$%=+1$>2%<$+$%>10$?%
`would not be addressing the same issue, each could be 25 pages, whether the briefs were filed
`
`2$*4+49$05%)+%-)3=1/$?0RS+P2NLT9I4I+9MM2MS0++&I+9+72IU;38+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+:5NL;42M+
`separately or combined.”) (emphasis added). As a result, Petitioner’s Memorandum complied
`
`O43T+3T2+L9H2+72gU472N263I+U6M27+J_+.0F0*0+`>0B>_P9S0++
`with the page requirements under 37 C.F.R. §2. 127(a).
`
`,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+4I+V53T+9+V742Y+46+5LL5I43456+96M+9+V742Y+46+IULL5730++
`Petitioner’s Memorandum is both a brief in opposition and a brief in support.
`
`*2IL56M263XI+%53456+9MM72II2M+3T2+Y5;;5O46H+Y5U7+4IIU2I+2c:;UI4C2;W+35+IULL573+43I+N53456+Y57+
`Respondent’s Motion addressed the following four issues exclusively to support its motion for
`
`IUNN97W+]UMHN2631+PBS+3T2+I4N4;9743W+5Y+3T2+L97342IX+N97ZIh+P>S+3T2+L72I26:2+5Y+3T47M¥L973W+
`summary judgment: (1) the similarity of the parties’ marks; (2) the presence of third-party
`
`72H4I3793456I+96M+UI2+5Y+3T2+327N+Q72MR+46+:5662:3456+O43T+:;53T46Hh+PJS+3T2+2C4M26:2+5Y+9:3U9;+
`registrations and use of the term “red” in connection with clothing; (3) the evidence of actual
`
`:56YUI456h+96M+P@S+3T2+L72I26:2+5Y+Q9MM434569;+Y9:357IR0B++,234345627+9MM72II2M+29:T+5Y+3T2I2+
`confusion; and (4) the presence of “additional factors”.1 Petitioner addressed each of these
`
`+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
`B+*2H4I37963+9;I5+N5C2M+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+56+,234345627XI+M4;U3456+:;94N8+VU3+I46:2+,234345627+M4M+653+
`1 Registrant also moved for summary judgment on Petitioner’s dilution claim, but since Petitioner did not
`9MM72II+3T93+97HUN263+46+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN8+43+M52I+653+Y9:357+4635+3T2+L72I263+969;WI4I0
`address that argument in Petitioner’s Memorandum, it does not factor into the present analysis.
`
`¥>¥
`
`

`
`4IIU2I+46+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+46+57M27+35+2I39V;4IT+3T93+,234345627+O9I+653+26343;2M+35+
`issues in Petitioner’s Memorandum in order to establish that Petitioner was not entitled to
`
`IUNN97W+]UMHN263+56+3T2+V9I4I+5Y+3T2I2+4IIU2I0++
`summary judgment on the basis of these issues.
`
`$6+9MM43456+35+9MM72II46H+29:T+5Y+3T2+4IIU2I+794I2M+VW+*2IL56M263+46+57M27+35+
`In addition to addressing each of the issues raised by Respondent in order to
`
`M2Y293+*2IL56M263XI+%534568+,234345627+9MM72II2M I2C279;+9MM434569;8+62O+4IIU2I+46+57M27+35+
`defeat Respondent’s Motion, Petitioner addressed several additional, new issues in order to
`
`IULL573+,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456+96M+35+2I39V;4IT+3T93+43+O9I+,2343456278+653+*2IL56M2638+OT5+4I+
`support Petitioner’s Cross-Motion and to establish that it was Petitioner, not Respondent, who is
`
`26343;2M+35+IUNN97W+]UMHN2630++$6+IULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+.75II¥%534568+,234345627XI+
`entitled to summary judgment. In support of Petitioner’s Cross-Motion, Petitioner’s
`
`%2N5796MUN+9MM72II2M+3T2+Y5;;5O46H+4IIU2I8+6562+5Y+OT4:T+O9I 794I2M+57+9MM72II2M+46+
`Memorandum addressed the following issues, none of which was raised or addressed in
`
`*2IL56M263XI+%534561+PBS+3T2+I4N4;9743W+5Y+3T2+L97342IX+H55MIh+P>S+3T2+I4N4;9743W+5Y+3T2+L97342IX+
`Respondent’s Motion: (1) the similarity of the parties’ goods; (2) the similarity of the parties’
`
`:T9662;I+5Y+379M2h+PJS+3T2+I5LT4I34:93456+5Y+3T2+:56IUN27I+5Y+3T2+L97342IX+H55MIh+96M+P@S+3T2+Y9N2+
`channels of trade; (3) the sophistication of the consumers of the parties’ goods; and (4) the fame
`
`5Y+,234345627XI+*(i+j&,+%97ZI0++,234345627+T9M+35+9MM72II+29:T+5Y+3T2I2+4IIU2I+46+57M27+Y57+
`of Petitioner’s RED KAP Marks. Petitioner had to address each of these issues in order for
`
`,234345627+35+L75L27;W+2I39V;4IT+43I 26343;2N263+35+IUNN97W+]UMHN2630++
`Petitioner to properly establish its entitlement to summary judgment.
`
`*2IL56M263XI+72;496:2+56+())*$++4I+N4IL;9:2M+9I+3T2+:9I28+46+Y9:38+IULL573XI+
`Respondent’s reliance on Cooper is misplaced as the case, in fact, support’s
`
`,234345627XI+L5I434560++GT2+^597MXI+T5;M46H+46+())*$+ :56Y47NI+3T93+9+J>¥L9H2+N2N5796MUN+5Y+
`Petitioner’s position. The Board’s holding in Cooper confirms that a 32-page memorandum of
`
`;9O+3T93+9MM72II2I+M4YY27263+4IIU2I+46+5LL5I43456+35+9+N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+96M+46+
`law that addresses different issues in opposition to a motion for summary judgment and in
`
`IULL573+5Y+9+:75II¥N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+O5U;M+:5NL;W+O43T+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>_P9S8+
`support of a cross-motion for summary judgment would comply with Trademark Rule 2.127(a),
`
`OT23T27+3T2+L9H2I+972+L72I2632M+46+562+57+3O5+I2L97932+V742YI0++#$$ ())*$+8+e=+E0D0,0f0>M+93+
`whether the pages are presented in one or two separate briefs. See Cooper, 89 U.S.P.Q.2d at
`
`B@_=8+60+>0++D46:2+6243T27+5Y+3T2+V742YI+93+4IIU2+46+())*$++:5NL74I2M+V53T+9+72IL56I2+96M+9+:75II¥
`1479, n. 2. Since neither of the briefs at issue in Cooper comprised both a response and a cross-
`
`N53456+3T93+29:T+9MM72II2M+M4YY27263+4IIU2I8+3T2+L97342I+46+())*$+%O272+56;W+26343;2M+35+3O263W¥
`motion that each addressed different issues, the parties in Cooper were only entitled to twenty-
`
`Y4C2+L9H2I0++$6+:56379I38+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+9MM72II2I+29:T+5Y+3T2+4IIU2I+794I2M+VW+
`five pages. In contrast, Petitioner’s Memorandum addresses each of the issues raised by
`
`*2IL56M263+46+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+96M8+46+9MM434568+9MM72II2I+I2C279;+62O+4IIU2I8+653+
`Respondent in Respondent’s Motion and, in addition, addresses several new issues, not
`
`L72C45UI;W+794I2M+VW+*2IL56M2638+35+IULL573+,234345627XI+.75II¥%534560++GT272Y5728+,2343456278+
`previously raised by Respondent, to support Petitioner’s Cross-Motion. Therefore, Petitioner,
`
`U6;4Z2+3T2+L97342I+46+())*$+8+O9I+26343;2M+35+UI2+9;;+Y4Y3W+L9H2I+9C94;9V;20
`unlike the parties in Cooper, was entitled to use all fifty pages available.
`
`¥J¥
`
`

`
`FU73T27N5728+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+M52I+653+:56I343U32+3T2+I573+5Y+4NL75L27+
`Furthermore, Petitioner’s Memorandum does not constitute the sort of improper
`
`9332NL3+35+IUVC273+3T2+L9H2+;4N43+3T93+I27C2M+9I+3T2+Y5U6M93456+5Y+3T2+^597MXI+M2:4I456+46+())*$+8+
`attempt to subvert the page limit that served as the foundation of the Board’s decision in Cooper,
`
`657+M52I+*2IL56M263+N9Z2+96W+IUHH2I3456+35+3T2+:563797W8+57+794I2+96W+4IIU2+5Y+L72]UM4:20++$6+
`nor does Respondent make any suggestion to the contrary, or raise any issue of prejudice. In
`
`())*$+8+3T2+^597M+9LL;42M+3T2+T5;M46H+Y75N+82949$%)>%#.4@A+%6&%,.A'%B1>$%(0)9.1/'%()&8+
`Cooper, the Board applied the holding from Estate ofShakur v. Thug Life Clothing Co. ,
`
`A_ E0D0,0f0>M+B?=A8+B?=k+PGG&^+>???S+35+2I39V;4IT+3T2+7U;2+Y57+OT23T27+3T2+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2+
`57 U.S.P.Q.2d 1095, 1096 (TTAB 2000) to establish the rule for whether the twenty-five page
`
`;4N43+O9I+9LL;4:9V;2+35+9+:5NV462M+V742Y+57+OT23T27+3T2+:5NV462M+V742Y+:5U;M8+46+Y9:38+V2+26343;2M+
`limit was applicable to a combined brief or whether the combined brief could, in fact, be entitled
`
`35+3O5+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2+;4N43I0++$6+#.4@A+8+3T2+^597M+T2;M+3T93+3T2+72IL56M263+4NL75L27;W+
`to two twenty-five page limits. In Shakur, the Board held that the respondent improperly
`
`9332NL32M+35+:47:UNC263+3T2+L9H2+;4N4393456+VW+QM4II2:3a46Hb+OT93+4I+9+I46H;2+N53456+35+:5NL2;+
`attempted to circumvent the page limitation by “dissect[ing] what is a single motion to compel
`
`4635+3O5+N53456I+I2L97932;W+9MM72II46H+4632775H935742I+96M+M5:UN263+72gU2I3I+46+57M27+35+Y4;2+
`into two motions separately addressing interrogatories and document requests in order to file
`
`V742YI+3539;46H+A?+L9H2I0R++$6+9MM43456+35+43I+:5NL;496:2+O43T+3T2+7U;2I8+,234345627XI+H55M+Y943T+
`briefs totaling 50 pages.” In addition to its compliance with the rules, Petitioner’s good faith
`
`IUVN4II456+T272+5Y+9+:5NV462M+V742Y+3T93+V53T+9MM72II2M+29:T+5Y+3T2+4IIU2I+794I2M+VW+*2IL56M263+
`submission here of a combined brief that both addressed each of the issues raised by Respondent
`
`46+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+96M+9MM72II2M+29:T+5Y+3T2+9MM434569;+4IIU2I+72gU472M+35+2I39V;4IT+43I+74HT3+
`in Respondent’s Motion and addressed each of the additional issues required to establish its right
`
`35+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+46+IULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456+:;297;W+M52I+653+:56I343U32+3T2+3WL2+
`to summary judgment in support of Petitioner’s Cross-Motion clearly does not constitute the type
`
`5Y+4NL75L27+9332NL3+35+Q:47:UNC263R+3T2+L9H2+;4N43+3T93+M75C2+V53T+5Y+3T2+^597MXI+M2:4I456I+46+
`of improper attempt to “circumvent” the page limit that drove both of the Board’s decisions in
`
`())*$++96M+#.4@A+0+ #$$%$&'& C4/@%D/$%()+*&%6&%(.4+9$+%D/$%E1/4/-1402%;/-&8+>??@+GG&^+
`Cooper and Shakur. See e.g. Bank One Corp. v. Charter One Financials Inc., 2004 TTAB
`
`-(l$D+>@B+PGG&^+&L74;+>@8+>??@S+P^597M+9::2L32M+3O5+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+V742YI+OT4:T+
`LEXIS 241 (TTAB April 24, 2004) (Board accepted two summary judgment briefs which
`
`:5;;2:34C2;W+2c:22M2M+3T2+>A¥L9H2+;4N43+V9I2M8+1/9$+%40148+56+3T2+Y9:3+3T93+3T272+O9I+Q65+2C4M26:2+
`collectively exceeded the 25-page limit based, inter alia, on the fact that there was “no evidence
`
`3T93+aN5C963b+I5UHT3+35+:47:UNC263+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>_P9SRS0
`that [movant] sought to circumvent Trademark Rule 2.127(a)”).
`
`*2IL56M263XI+IUHH2I32M+46327L72393456+5Y+3T2+72gU472N263I+U6M27+G79M2N97Z+
`Respondent’s suggested interpretation of the requirements under Trademark
`
`*U;2 >0B>_P9S+72IU;3I+46+9+YU6M9N2639;;W+U6Y947+96M+T4HT;W+L72]UM4:49;+72IU;30++$6+:56379I3+35+3T2+
`Rule 2. l27(a) results in a fundamentally unfair and highly prejudicial result. In contrast to the
`
`2gU9;+37293N263+:9;;2M+Y57+U6M27+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>_P9S+PU6M27+OT4:T+V53T+,234345627+96M+
`equal treatment called for under Trademark Rule 2. l27(a) (under which both Petitioner and
`
`*2IL56M263+972+26343;2M+35+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I+35+IULL573+3T247+72IL2:34C2+N53456I+9;56H+O43T+96+
`Respondent are entitled to twenty-five pages to support their respective motions along with an
`
`9MM434569;+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I+35+5LL5I2+3T247+5LL56263XI+N53456S8+*2IL56M263XI+L75YY272M+
`additional twenty-five pages to oppose their opponent’s motion), Respondent’s proffered
`
`¥@¥
`
`

`
`46327L72393456+O5U;M+72IU;3+46+,234345627+V246H+;4N432M+35+9+>@>EI+5Y+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I+35 V53T+
`
`72IL56M+35+3T2+4IIU2I+794I2M+46+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+96M+35+IULL573+3T2+M4YY27263+4IIU2I+794I2M+46+
`
`,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456 d+OT4;2+*2IL56M263+O5U;M+72:24C2+9+3539;+5Y+Y4Y3W+L9H2I+V2:9UI2+43+
`
`O5U;M+T9C2+3O5+I2L97932+V742YI+5Y+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I0++)T4;2+*2IL56M263XI+729I56I+Y57+L75YY2746H+
`
`IU:T+96+46327L72393456+5Y+J_+.0F0*0+`>0B>_P9S+972+:;2978+*2IL56M263XI+46327L72393456+4I+:;297;W+
`
`U6MU;W+L72]UM4:49;+V2:9UI2+,234345627+O5U;M+U;34N932;W+V2+26343;2M+35+56;W+T9;Y+5Y+3T2+IL9:2+
`
`9C94;9V;2+35+*2IL56M2630+ %5725C278+*2IL56M263XI+729M46H+5Y+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>_P9S+O5U;M+
`
`9;I5+L269;4m2+,234345627+I4NL;W+V2:9UI28+46+3T2+463272I3+5Y+N464N4m46H+3T2+I:5L2+96M+9N5U63+5Y+
`
`IUVN4II456I+Y57+3T2+^597M+35+:56I4M278+,234345627+:T5I2+35+M5+3O5+V742YI 46+562+M5:UN263+793T27+
`
`3T96+46+3O5+M4YY27263+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2+V742YI0++.;297;W+*U;2+>0B>_P9S8+2C26+9I+46327L7232M+46+
`
`())*$+8 M52I+653+N96M932+IU:T+9+72gU472N2638+657+3T2+YU6M9N2639;;W+U6Y947+96M+L72]UM4:49;+
`
`72IU;3+I5UHT3+VW+*2IL56M263+T2720
`
`$6+IUNN97W8+V2:9UI2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN 9MM72II2M+M4YY27263+4IIU2I+VW+
`
`5LL5I46H+29:T+5Y+3T2+4IIU2I+794I2M+46+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+96M+3T2+9MM434569;+4IIU2I+72gU472M+35+
`
`IULL573+,234345627XI+.75II¥%534568+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+O9I+26343;2M+35+9+3539;+5Y+Y4Y3W+
`
`L9H2I+35+V2+UI2M+9I+,234345627+M2:4M2M0++&I+9+72IU;38+96M+9I+:;297;W+72:5H64m2M+VW+3T2+^597M+46+
`
`())*$+8+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+d 562 :5NV462M+J>¥L9H2+V742Y+3T93+9MM72II2M+M4YY27263+
`
`4IIU2I d :5NL;42I+O43T+3T2+L9H2+;4N43+U6M27+J_+.0F0*0+`>0B>_P9S+LU7IU963+35+OT4:T+3T2+3539;+N9W+
`
`V2+A?+L9H2I8+Y4;2M+I2L97932;W+57+46+:5NV46934560++#$$%())*$+ 93+B@_=8+60+>0
`
`4<
`
`&J=%4@EBF%/EQ%(R=BS?C=%#>C%*?CSB=>?@A%&@%,SS=H>%-=>?>?@A=B6C%/=D@BEAFGD
`
`(C26+4Y+3T2+^597M+9::2L32M+*2IL56M263XI+L5I43456+3T93+,234345627+O9I8+46+Y9:38+56;W+
`
`26343;2M+35+3O263W¥Y4C2+L9H2I+U6M27+J_+.0F0*0+`>0B>_P9S8+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+IT5U;M+I34;;+V2+
`
`M2642M0++$6I329M8+3T2+^597M+IT5U;M+2c27:4I2+43I+M4I:723456+96M+243T27+H7963+,234345627+;29C2+35+
`
`¥A¥
`
`

`
`72IUVN43+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN>+46+3T2+Y57N93+I23+Y573T+46+(cT4V43+B+57+I4NL;W+9::2L3+
`
`,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+9I+574H469;;W+Y4;2M+O43T5U3+:56I4M2793456+5Y+3T2+9MM434569;+2;2N263I8+
`
`OT4:T+9;3T5UHT+T2;LYU;+35+3T2+^597M+972+653+72gU472M+35+V2+46:;UM2M8 46:;UM46H+3T2+:5C27+L9H28+
`
`39V;2+5Y+:563263I+96M+39V;2+5Y+9U3T574342I0++
`
`GT2+^597M+T9I+2c27:4I2M+43I+M4I:723456+35+9::2L3+V742YI+3T93+T9C2+653+:56Y57N2M
`
`O43T+3T2+7U;2I+Y57+6UN275UI+729I56I8+OT23T27+Y57+V246H+5C27+9+L9H2+;4N438+57+Y94;U72+35+:5NL;W+
`
`O43T+L75L27+Y57N93346H+72gU472N263I8+57+2C26+OT26+Y4;2M+;9320++#$$%$&'&%,+$@%C1-5-0$()+*&%6&%
`
`,+$@842$%()+*&8+/LL5I43456+<50+=BB_@?eA+PGG&^+F2V0+>k8+>??=S+P^597M+:56I4M272M+V742Y+O43T+
`
`2c:2II4C2+I46H;2¥IL9:46H+3T93+O5U;M+T9C2+2c:22M2M+L9H2¥;4N43+4Y+M5UV;2+IL9:2M+V2:9UI2+Q43+4I+
`
`H26279;;W+T2;LYU;+35+3T2+^597M0RSh+74130$+%(.+520$+%()+*&%6&%F45?4@:%/LL5I43456+<50+=BBAJB_>+
`
`PGG&^+&L74;+@8+>??eS+P^597M+9::2L32M+;932¥Y4;2M+72IL56I2+35+N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263Sh+
`
`C4/@%D/$8+>??@+GG&^+-(l$D+>@Bh+G3$+1-4/%H.4+34-$A91-40%G22)-&%6&%G3$+1-4/%G22)-&%)>%
`
`H.4+34-$A91-40%#-1$/912928+/LL5I43456+<50+=BBBA=eA+PGG&^+%97:T+B?8+>??@S+P^597M+2c27:4I2M
`
`43I+M4I:723456+35+L27N43+3T2+Y4;46H+5Y+9+IUVI343U32+72L;W+V742Y+3T93+O5U;M+:5NL;W+O43T+L9H2+;4N43+
`
`72gU472N263+9Y327+3T2+72MU:3456+5Y+Y563+I4m2+96M+3T2+M2;23456+5Y+3T2+39V;2+5Y+:563263ISh G21-2%
`
`()+*& 6&%H1992=A+'.%H04291-2%F>'&:%;/-&8+>???+GG&^+-(l$D+e@e+PGG&^+<5C2NV27+J?8+>???S+
`
`P^597M+O94C2M+L9H2+;4N43+96M+M2642M+N53456+35+I374Z2+B@+L9H2+72L;W+V742Y+Q46+C42O+5Y+3T2+
`
`:5NL;2c43W+5Y+3T4I+:56I5;4M932M+L75:22M46H8+96M+5U7+M4IL5I43456+5Y+3T2+N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+
`
`]UMHN263+0+0+0RSh+7461?%8+61/%6&%74IA1+1%E4-9)+5:%;/-&8+.96:2;;93456+<50+>B8eJ@+PGG&^+F2V0+B8+
`
`>???S+P^597M+2c27:4I2M+M4I:723456+96M+9::2L32M+;932¥Y4;2M+N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263Sh+
`
`J)9.$/=$+'%6&%C$-@34/8+/LL5I43456+<50+BBAJ>k+PGG&^+D2L30+Be8+B==eS+P^597M+:56I4M272M+
`
`+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
`>+$3+IT5U;M+V2+6532M+3T93+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+4I8+46+Y9:38+9+>A¥L9H2+V742Y+56:2+3T2+9MM434569;+2;2N263I8+
`46:;UM46H+3T2+39V;2+5Y+:563263I8+39V;2+5Y+9U3T574342I+96M+:5C27+IT223+972+72N5C2M8+96M+56:2+3T2+Y563+I4m2+4I+72MU:2M+
`Y75N+B>+L5463+35+BB+L5463+Y5630++#$$+(cT4V43+B0+
`
`¥k¥
`
`

`
`I46H;2¥IL9:2M+V742Y+3T93+M4M+653+:5NL;W+O43T+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>ePVSSh+#1'/49A+$%C+4/?2:%;/-&%6&%
`
`J)=$+9%B$.+$+%G22)-208+/LL5I43456+<50+=BB?ek_+PGG&^+[U62+B8+B==JS+P^597M+2c27:4I2M+43I+
`
`M4I:723456+96M+:56I4M272M+5C27¥;26H3T+V742Y+V2:9UI28+1/9$+%40148+Q3T2+N932749;+72gU472M+VW+7U;2+M4M+
`
`653+2c:22M+3T2+AA+L9H2+;4N43+0+0+0RS0J
`
`)43T5U3+N9Z46H+96W+:T96H2I+35+3T2+9:3U9;+32c3+5Y+3T2+574H469;+C27I456+5Y+
`
`,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN8+9I+6532M8+3T2+C27I456+9339:T2M+93+(cT4V43+B 72IU;3I+46+9+3O263W¥Y4C2+
`
`L9H2+V742Y0++GT272Y5728+3T2+574H469;+V742Y+9I+IUVN4332M+M52I+653+:56I343U32+96+QU6MU;W+;56H+V742YR+
`
`96M+3T2+^597M+IT5U;M+2c27:4I2+43I+M4I:7234568+9I+43+M4M+46+3T2+Y572H546H+46I396:2I8+96M+243T27+9::2L3+
`
`,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+9I+574H469;;W+IUVN4332M+57+L27N43+,234345627+35+72¥IUVN43+,234345627XI+
`
`%2N5796MUN+9I+9339:T2M+93+(cT4V43+B0++#$$ G3$+1-4/%H.4+34-$A91-40%G22)-&%6&%G3$+1-4/%G22)-&%
`
`)>%H.4+34-$A91-40%#-1$/912928+/LL5I43456+<50+=BBBA=eA+PGG&^+%97:T+B?8+>??@S+P^597M+
`
`2c27:4I2M+43I+M4I:723456+35+L27N43+3T2+Y4;46H+5Y+9+IUVI343U32+72L;W+V742Y+3T93+O5U;M+:5NL;W+O43T+
`
`L9H2+;4N43+72gU472N263+9Y327+3T2+72MU:3456+5Y+Y563+I4m2+96M+3T2+M2;23456+5Y+3T2+39V;2+5Y+:563263IS0
`
`3<
`
`-=>?>?@A=B6C%(T?F=AS=%,AF%*=SIEBE>?@AC%+GUD?>>=F%#A%1HH@C?>?@A%&@
`.=CH@AF=A>6C%/@>?@A%+J@GIF%4= 3@AC?F=B=F%4Q%&J=%4@EBF%.=VEBFI=CC%1W
`7J=>J=B%&J=%4@EBF%+>B?K=C -=>?>?@A=B6C%/=D@BEAFGDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%%
`
`F469;;W8+*2IL56M263XI+N53456+35+I374Z2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+IT5U;M+653+
`
`72IU;3+46+3T2+I374Z46H+5Y+3T2+2C4M26:2+96M+M2:;9793456I+IUVN4332M+VW+,234345627+46+5LL5I43456+35+
`
`*2IL56M263XI+%53456+Y57+DUNN97W+[UMHN2630++*2H97M;2II+5Y+OT23T27+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+
`
`2c:22M2M+3T2+L9H2+;4N438+,234345627+M4M+IUVN43+3O5+M2:;9793456I+O43T+2C4M26:2+9339:T2M+3T272350++
`
`*2IL56M263+L75C4M2I+65+IULL573+Y57+43I+9II273456+3T93+3T2+3O5+M2:;9793456I+IT5U;M+9;I5+V2+I374:Z26+
`
`Y75N+3T2+72:57M0++$6+Y9:38+3T2+^597M+T9I+:56I4M272M+3T2+2C4M26:2+IUVN4332M+VW+9+L973W+2C26+OT26+
`
`3T93+L973W+T9M+43I+V742Y+I374:Z26+Y75N+3T2+72:57M0++#$$%C+))@2%6&%(+$4916$%G+92%=5%(400)<45:%BB(8+
`
`+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
`J+.5L42I+5Y+U672L5732M+M2:4I456I+972+9339:T2M+93+(cT4V43+>0
`
`¥_¥
`
`

`
`>??A+GG&^+-(l$D+AB@+PGG&^+<5C2NV27+>J8+>??AS+PQ$69INU:T+9I+5LL5I27XI+72L;W+V742Y+46+
`
`IULL573+5Y+T4I+N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+2c:22MI+3T2+326¥L9H2+;4N43+Y57+72L;W+V742YI+0+0+08+3T93+
`
`V742Y+T9I+72:24C2M+65+:56I4M27934568+VU3+O2+T9C2+:56I4M272M+3T2+72VU339;+2C4M26:2+IUVN4332M+
`
`3T272O43T0RSh+(0A=%G3$/191$2:%BB(%6&%H$99$/)/%()23$91-1%2/-8+.96:2;;93456+<50+=>?@JB_e+
`
`PGG&^+&UHUI3+Be8+>??AS+P5C27¥;26H3T+72L;W+V742Y+653+:56I4M272M8+VU3+72VU339;+2C4M26:2+IUVN4332M+
`
`O43T+72L;W+:56I4M272MSh+F)91)/%H1-9A+$%G22)-&%)>%G3$+1-4%6&%J$2*$-9%#*)+92<$4+8+>??A+GG&^+
`
`-(l$D+>>J+P%9W+>k8+>??AS+P^597M+:56I4M272M+72L;W+V742Y+96M+2C4M26:2+IUVN4332M+46+IULL573+5Y+
`
`N53456+Y57+IUNN97W+]UMHN263+9Y327+N2N5796MUN+5Y+;9O+46+IULL573+5Y+N53456+O9I+653+
`
`:56I4M272MS0++
`
`$6+C42O+5Y+3T2+9V5C28+*2IL56M263XI+N53456+IT5U;M+V2+M2642M+V2:9UI2+,234345627XI+
`
`%2N5796MUN+:5NL;42I+O43T+3T2+L9H2+;4N4393456I+U6M27+G79M2N97Z+*U;2+>0B>_P9S0++DT5U;M+3T2+
`
`^597M+:56:;UM2+3T93+,234345627+O9I+26343;2M+35+56;W+>A+L9H2I+35+V53T+5LL5I2+*2IL56M263XI+
`
`%53456+96M+35+IULL573+,234345627XI+.75II¥%534568+,234345627+O5U;M+72IL2:3YU;;W+72gU2I3+3T93+3T2+
`
`^597M+2c27:4I2+43I+M4I:723456+35+9::2L3+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+57+35+L27N43+,234345627+35+
`
`72¥IUVN43+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN+9I+9339:T2M+93+(cT4V43+B0+ F469;;W8+72H97M;2II+5Y+3T2+^597MXI+
`
`M2:4I456+9I+35+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN8+3T2+^597M+IT5U;M+:56I4M27+,234345627XI+2C4M26:2+96M+
`
`M2:;9793456I+IUVN4332M+46+5LL5I43456+35+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+96M+46+IULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+
`
`.75II¥%53456+9;56H+O43T+,234345627XI+*2L;W+%2N5796MUN+5Y+-9O+46+DULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+
`
`.75II¥%534560@++#$$%1?&
`
`+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
`@+,234345627XI+*2L;W+%2N5796MUN+5Y+-9O+46+DULL573+5Y+,234345627XI+.75II¥%53456+Y57+DUNN97W+[UMHN263+
`4I+V246H+Y4;2M+I4NU;39625UI;W+O43T+,234345627XI+/LL5I43456+35+*2IL56M263XI+%53456+35+D374Z20
`
`¥e¥
`
`

`
`*<
`
`3@ASIGC?@A
`
`F57+3T2+Y572H546H+729I56I8+,234345627+72IL2:3YU;;W+72gU2I3I+3T93+3T2+^597M+M26W+
`
`*2IL56M263XI+%53456+35+D374Z2+,234345627XI+%2N5796MUN0
`
`*2IL2:3YU;;W+IUVN4332M8
`
`KIK+,9U;+[0+j2662MW
`,9U;+[0+j2662MW8+(IgU472
`[0+&63T56W+-5C26IT24N278+(IgU472
`,(,,(*+n&%$-G/<+--,
`J???+GO5+-5H96+DgU972
`(4HT32263T+o+&7:T+D37223I
`,T4;9M2;LT498+,&++B=B?J¥>_==
`G2;1+P>BAS+=eB¥@???
`F9c1+P>BAS+=eB¥@_A?
`
`G99)+/$52%>)+%H$9191)/$+
`;34'$<$4+%G**4+$0%()+*&
`
`i932M1++&UHUI3+JB8+>??=
`
`¥=¥
`
`

`
`PETITIONER’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
`
`RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW
`
`IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`TTAB —- IMAGEWEAR APPAREL CORP. v. WINGS MANUFACTURING CORP.
`
`Cancellation No. 92045191 - Registration No. 2,995,193
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`IMAGEWEAR APPAREL CORP.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Cancellation No. 92045101
`
`'
`
`WINGS MANUFACTURING CORP.
`
`Registrant/Respondent.
`
`Registration No. 2,995,193
`
`PETITIONER’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO
`RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`1.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION
`
`Petitioner, Imagewear Apparel Corp. (“Petitioner”), through its undersigned counsel,
`
`hereby submits Petitioner’s Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`(“Respondent’s Motion”) and in Support of Petitioner’s Cross~Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`(“Petitioner’s Cross—Motion”). Respondent Wings Manufacturing Corp. (“Respondent”) bases its motion
`
`for summary judgment on a restrictive, self-serving analysis of the facts and a limited selection of the
`
`relevant DuPont factors that completely misappiies and/or ignores several key elements. Ali of these
`
`omitted elements overwhelmingly weigh in favor of the conclusion that Respondent’s RED SNAP Mark
`
`so resembles Petitioner’s RED KAP Marks as to be likely, when applied to Respondent’s goods, to cause
`
`confusion. As a result, Respondent’s Motion should be denied and Petitioner’s Cross-Motion for
`
`summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(0) should be granted and Respondent’s RED SNAP
`
`Mark should be cancelled pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (d).
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Petitioner’s RED KAP Trademarks
`
`Petitioner, through its predecessors in interest and licensees, has used the trademark RED
`
`KAP at least since 1927. Declaration of Stan Jewell (“Jewell Declf’) at 1] 6; see also Declaration of J.
`
`

`
`Anthony Lovensheimer (“Lovensheimer Dec1.”) at Exh. B at 4 and Exh. C (Deposition of Howard W.
`
`Wedekind (“Wedekind Depf’) N.T. 12-13). Petitioner owns federaliy—registered trademarks for the words
`
`“RED KAP” alone and in conjunction with additional words and/or designs, including the following
`
`(collectively hereinafter, “RED KAP Marks”):
`
`Mark
`
` Registration
`
`Registration
`‘Number
`
`Date
`
`RED KAP
`
`Reg. No. 3,058,253
`
`2/7/06
`
`RED KAP
`INDUSTRIES
`
`& Desi n
`
`RED KAP
`INDUSTRIES
`
`& Desi n
`
`RED KAP
`IMAGE PLUS
`
`HIGHLAND
`COLLECTION
`BY RED KAP
`
`RED I<LAP&
`
`Desin
`RED KAP
`SINCE 1923
`
`& Design
`
`Int
`C‘ta..rs
`IC 25
`
`IC 35
`
`IC 25
`
`Goods/Services Covered
`
`“Pants, coveralls, shirts, coats and
`'ackets”
`
`“Providing consumer product
`information via the intemet”
`“Pants”
`
`Reg. No. 1,359,300
`
`9/10/85
`
`Reg. No. 1,524,612
`
`2/14/'89
`
`EC 25
`
`“Coveralls, shirts, coats and
`
`jackets"
`
`Reg. No. 1,699,854
`
`7/7/92
`
`IC 25
`
`IC 25
`
`IC 25
`
`IC 25,
`9, and
`18
`
`Reg. No. 2,247,947
`
`5/25/99
`
`3/14/00
`
`Reg. No. 3,150,516
`
`
`
`“Kitchen apparel, namely, chef’ s
`and cook’s pants, jackets, and
`shirts and accessories, namely
`scarves, gloves, caps, and aprons,
`professional cover-ups, namely,
`laboratory coats, counter coats,
`staff coats, butcher coats, shop
`coats, aprons, smocks, wraps and
`dresses; dress uniform shirts”
`“Shirts, blazers, blouses, skirts,
`dress slacks, sweaters and vests”
`
`“Shirts, pants, shorts, blouses,
`'ackets, coveralls and 'eans”
`
`Aprons, bandanas, belts, pants,
`coats, coveralls, shirts, t-shirts,
`dresses, rainwear, gloves, jackets,
`jeans, lab coats, mittens, overalls,
`parkas, scarves, shorts, skirts,
`smocks, socks, sweatsuits,
`sweaters, uniforms, visors, wind-
`resistant jackets, boots, shoes and
`slippers” in International Class
`25;
`
`“Sunglasses” in International
`Class 9; and
`“Backpacks, dutfei bags, and
`wallets” in International Class 18
`
`

`
`See Jewell Decl. at Exhs. A through H. These valid and subsisting registrations are primafacie evidence
`
`of Petitioner’s exclusive right to use the RED KAP Marks in commerce on the goods specified. Id.
`
`Petitioner’s Use of the RED KAP Marks
`
`The history of the RED KAP Marks began in 1923, when two brothers and their cousin
`
`started a business in Nashville, Tennessee that manufactured and sold bib overalls for men and boys to the
`
`retail and mail order markets in the South and Midwest. Jewell Decl. at fl 7; Lovensheimer Decl. at Exh.
`
`D at 4. Alter four years, they adopted the RED KAP trademark along with the earliest version of the
`
`RED KAP and design logo in 1927. Jewell Decl. at 1l 7; Lovensheimer Decl. at Exh. C (Wedekind Dep.
`
`N.T. l8~i9).
`
`Since the first use of the RED KAP Marks in 1927, Red Kap has expanded its original
`
`business to include a variety of apparel. Jewell Deci. at1] 8. During World War II, Red Kap filled orders
`
`for pants and field jackets for the Army and Navy.
`
`Id. Following World War II, Red Kap entered the
`
`rental laundry business by developing the first laundry~friendly high quality, high durability industrial
`
`shirt and pant that could withstand the rigors of industrial washing. Id. at 1] 9. It also introduced several
`
`other innovative garments including the first laundry~friendly durable press gannents featuring the 65%
`
`polyester/3 5% cotton combination, and durable flame~resistant cotton fabric using the “ammonia cure”
`
`process.
`
`Id.
`
`After first entering the growing wornen’s unifonn business in 1970, today Red Kap has
`
`the broadest women’s product line offering of anyone in the industry. Id. at 1[ 10.
`
`Beginning in the 1980's, Red Kap once again met customer demands by expanding into
`
`executive attire and kitchen and service apparel.
`
`Id. at 1l
`
`1 1. RED KAP apparel became available for the
`
`entire spectrum of markets from white collar to blue coliar. Id. The new spirit of consumerism had
`
`brought a dynamic shift — from traditional uniforms to apparel that was more comfortable, more casual
`
`and more in “tune" with retail contemporary clothing. Id. see also Lovensheirner Decl. at Exh. C
`
`(Wedekind Dep. N.T. 38-39, 50-51)
`
`

`
`Over the course of the last decade, the RED KAP brand has continued to evolve to
`
`accommodate the growing consumer demand for more casual and diverse fabric blends and styles, and the
`
`demand for increased availability of RED KAP brand apparel at retail. Jewell Decl. at ll 12;
`
`Lovenslieimer Decl. at Exh. C (Wedekind Dep. N.T. 38-39, 78-8 E, 83-83). This continued evolution of
`
`the RED KAP brand has taken place since Petitioner took over the RED KAP brand. The RED KAP
`
`brand which began in 1923 being used on bib overalls is now used, and will continue to be used, on a fail
`
`line apparel, including but not limited to nnifonns, heavy-duty work pants, knit polo shirts, button-down
`
`oxford shirts, jeans, khakis, and shorts for both men and women. Jewell Decl. atfil 12.
`
`Due to the long-standing tradition of dedication to research, hard work, and strong
`
`commitment to workmanship, Petitioner is the largest supplier of uniform apparel and other work clothing
`
`in the United States. Jewell Decl. ‘ll 13. The products sold under the RED KAP Marks represent
`
`unmatched style, design, fashion, comfort, care, and a commitment to quality craftsmanship.
`
`Id.
`
`Petitioner will continue to grow, develop and expand its RED KAP product line as Petitioner is a part of
`
`VF Corporation, the largest apparel company in the world. Id.; see also Lovensheimer Decl. at Exhs.
`
`Al-A49 and Exh. E at 3.
`
`Petitioner’s Marketing and Sales
`
`Petitioner has continuously promoted RED KAP apparel nationwide through catalogs.
`
`Id. at fil 14, Exh. 1. RED KAP apparel has also been promoted nationwide continuously through
`
`newspapers, print campaigns, retail advertisements, email blasts, direct mailers, radio, trade journals,
`
`merchandizing tlyers, newsletters, customer communications, at the point—of~sale, and at various websites
`
`including www.vfc.coni, wwvv.vfirnagewear.com, www.redkap.com, and http://vansapparel.com/redkap/.
`
`Id. at1l 15, Exhs. J—L; Lovensheirner Decl. at Exh. C (Wedekind Dep. N.T. 94-97).
`
`RED KAP apparel is sold at retail at the department store Sears and through Sears’
`
`website at www.sears.com. Jewell Decl. at ‘ll 16, Exhs. M and N. RED KAP apparel is also sold at retaii
`
`through a wide variety of outlets including, but not limited to VF Outlets, catalogs, and the Internet,
`
`including www.vans.com, www.zappos.com, www.hanger9-4.com, wwwsurfing-waves.com,
`
`-4-
`
`

`
`www.tactics.corn, www.carefreecasuals.corn, www.krnart.com, and www.cowtownskateboards.com. Id.
`
`at 1} I 7, Exh. 0; RED KAP apparel is also sold through over six thousand distributors across the country.
`
`Id. at 11 E9, Exhibit Q; see also Lovensheimer Dec]. at Exh. C (Wedekind Dep. N.T.