throbber
ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`ESTTA1395400
`11/13/2024
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer information
`
`Name
`
`Granted to date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`O Positiv Inc.
`
`12/07/2024
`
`11740 SAN VICENTE BLVD
`STE 109-333
`LOS ANGELES, CA 90049
`UNITED STATES
`
`ADAM LOSEY
`LOSEY PLLC
`1420 EDGEWATER DR
`ORLANDO, FL 32804
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: alosey@losey.law
`Secondary email(s): ijohnson@losey.law, jbuttell@losey.law, docket-
`ing@losey.law
`No phone number provided
`
`Docket no.
`
`Applicant information
`
`Application no.
`
`98393531
`
`Opposition filing
`date
`
`Applicant
`
`11/13/2024
`
`Publication date
`
`10/08/2024
`
`Opposition period
`ends
`
`12/07/2024
`
`Natuur Global, LLC
`402 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE #400
`SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/services affected by opposition
`
`Class 005. First Use: Jan 2, 2024 First Use In Commerce: Jan 2, 2024
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Dietary supplements for prostatitis, chronic
`prostatitis, chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and all other prostate conditions
`
`Grounds for opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`No use of mark in commerce before application,
`amendment to allege use, or statement of use
`was due
`
`Applicant not rightful owner of mark for identified
`goods or services
`
`Trademark Act Section 1(a) and (c)
`
`Trademark Act Section 1
`
`

`

`Misuse of registration symbol
`
`Copelands' Enterprises Inc. v. CNV Inc., 945
`F.2d 1563, 20 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
`
`Mark cited by opposer as basis for opposition
`
`U.S. registration
`no.
`
`6902704
`
`Register
`
`Principal
`
`Registration date
`
`11/15/2022
`
`Word mark
`
`Design mark
`
`URO
`
`Application date
`
`06/10/2021
`
`Foreign priority
`date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 005. First use: First Use: Aug 22, 2022 First Use In Commerce: Aug 22,
`2022
`Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Mineral supplements; Nutritional supplements
`
`Attachments
`
`90767350#TMSN.png( bytes )
`Notice of Opposition re UROLOQ with exhibits.pdf(654506 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/Ian Johnson/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Ian Johnson
`
`11/13/2024
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`O Positiv, Inc.
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`v.
`
`Natuur Global LLC,
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. _________________
`Mark: UROLO-Q
`Serial No. 98393531
`Filed: February 6, 2024
`Published: October 8, 2024
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Opposer O Positiv Inc. (“O Positiv”), a Delaware corporation, believes it is or will be
`
`damaged by registration of the mark UROLO-Q (“Applicant’s Mark”), Serial No. 98393531 (the
`
`“Application”), filed by Applicant Natuur Global LLC (“Applicant”), and opposes the registration
`
`of the Application. As grounds for opposition, O Positiv asserts as follows:
`
`1.
`
`O Positiv is in the business of marketing, distributing, and selling a variety of goods,
`
`including tea, medicinal preparations, deodorants, skincare, probiotics, suppositories, and vitamin,
`
`mineral, herbal, homeopathic, nutritional, and other dietary supplements (“Opposer’s Goods”) in
`
`interstate commerce throughout the United States.
`
`2.
`
`O Positiv owns US Registration No. 6902704 for “URO” in Class 05 for “Vitamins;
`
`Dietary supplements; Mineral supplements; Nutritional supplements” (the “URO Mark”). See
`
`Exhibit A. O Positiv filed the URO Mark on June 10, 2021 and began use in commerce by August
`
`22, 2022. See Ex. A.
`
`3.
`
`O Positiv has expended considerable time, money, and effort in advertising and
`
`promoting Opposer’s Goods under O Positiv’s marks, including the URO Mark. As a result, O
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Positiv has developed substantial and exclusive goodwill and reputation based on the use of these
`
`marks in connection with Opposer’s Goods.
`
`4.
`
`Applicant filed the Application seeking to register UROLO-Q in Class 05 for
`
`“Dietary supplements for prostatitis, chronic prostatitis, chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain
`
`syndrome and all other prostate conditions.”
`
`5.
`
`The URO Mark has priority over the Application and Applicant’s Mark because the
`
`Application claims a first use in commerce of January 2, 2024 while the URO mark has been in
`
`use since August 2022 and has constructive priority dating back to June 2021.
`
`Ground One – Likelihood of Confusion
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`O Positiv realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 5 above.
`
`Applicant’s Mark and the URO Mark are highly similar, if not identical, in sight,
`
`sound, and commercial impression. Specifically, Applicant’s Mark incorporates the entirety of the
`
`URO Mark.
`
`8.
`
`The goods claimed in the Application are highly similar to Opposer’s Goods
`
`because the goods claimed in the Application (i) could reasonably be expected to originate from
`
`the same source as products offered under the URO Mark, (ii) would travel in the same channels
`
`of trade as Opposer’s Goods, or (iii) consist of goods which could logically or commonly be
`
`provided by producers of Opposer’s Goods under the same marks. As a result, many consumers
`
`who encounter Applicant’s Mark in connection with the relevant goods are likely to think that such
`
`goods are authorized by, sponsored by, licensed by, affiliated with, or related to O Positiv.
`
`9.
`
`As a result, Applicant’s Mark, used in conjunction with the applied-for goods, is
`
`likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception in the minds of consumers that Applicant’s goods
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`emanate from O Positiv or are otherwise sponsored by, licensed by, affiliated with, or related to O
`
`Positiv, to the damage and detriment of O Positiv.
`
`Ground Two – No Bona Fide Use by Applicant
`
`O Positiv realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 5 above.
`
`Applicant filed the Application under § 1(a) of the Lanham Act, asserting that
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`registration is proper based on Applicant’s use of the mark in commerce.
`
`12.
`
`An application under § 1(a) must be supported by a specimen showing Applicant’s
`
`use of the mark in commerce.
`
`13.
`
`Following an office action refusing the Application for lack of a specimen,
`
`Applicant submitted a specimen consisting of a single web page screenshot, a copy of which is
`
`attached as Exhibit B.
`
`14.
`
`The specimen indicates that the product bearing the UROLO-Q mark is sold under
`
`the house mark “Sunn Biolabs.” This mark appears in the upper left corner of the bottle shown in
`
`the specimen.
`
`15.
`
`The web domain for the specimen is sunnbiolabs.com. Visiting this website
`
`indicates that the products sold thereon are sold by Sunn Biolabs. The website’s copyright footer
`
`and Terms & Privacy page all indicate that the website is operated by Sunn Biolabs LLC.
`
`16.
`
`Applicant Natuur Global LLC’s name does not appear anywhere on the website.
`
`Nothing on the website establishes any relationship between Natuur Global LLC and Sunn
`
`Biolabls LLC.
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, no such relationship exists.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`18.
`
`Therefore, the specimen fails to show use of Applicant’s Mark in commerce by
`
`Applicant.1
`
`19.
`
`Based on the specimen of record, Applicant has failed to show use of its mark in
`
`commerce and is not entitled to registration of Applicant’s Mark.
`
`Ground Three – Misuse of Registration Symbol
`
`O Positiv realleges and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 5 above.
`
`The Sunn Biolabs website utilizes the registration symbol in connection with
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`UROLO-Q. See Exhibit C.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`There is no federal registration for UROLO-Q other than the pending Application.
`
`The use of the ® symbol without a corresponding registration constitutes fraudulent
`
`misuse of the federal registration symbol.
`
`24.
`
`This fraudulent misuse merits refusal to register the Application.
`
`WHEREFORE, O Positiv respectfully asks the Opposition be sustained and the registration
`
`of the Application be denied.
`
`Respectfully submitted on November 13, 2024.
`
`By: /s/Ian Johnson/
`Ian T. Johnson
`ijohnson@losey.law
`docketing@losey.law
`T: 440-714-4966
`Adam C. Losey
`alosey@losey.law
`Losey PLLC
`1420 Edgewater Drive
`Orlando, FL 32804
`Counsel for O Positiv
`
`
`
`
`1 This further suggests that Applicant does not own the rights to the mark, which if true would be a further ground to
`refuse registration.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`11/8/24, 8:58 AM
`
`Statu s Search SN 6902704
`
`For assistance with TSDR , email teas@uspto.gov and include your serial number
`messages you have received.
`
`, the document you are looking for
`
`, and a screenshot of any error
`
`STATUS
`
`DOCUMENTS
`
`MAINTENANCE
`
`Back to Search
`
`Print
`
`Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2024-11-08 08:55:53 EST
`
`Mark: URO
`
`US Serial Number: 90767350
`
`US Registration Number: 6902704
`
`Filed as TEAS Plus: Yes
`
`Register: Principal
`
`Mark Type: Trademark
`
`TM5 Common Status
`Descriptor:
`
`Application Filing Date: Jun. 10, 2021
`
`Registration Date: Nov . 15, 2022
`
`Currently TEAS Plus: Yes
`
`LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active
`
`The trademark application has been registered with the Of
`
`fice.
`
`Status: Registered. The registration date is used to determine when post-registration maintenance documents are due.
`
`Status Date: Nov . 15, 2022
`
`Publication Date: Jan. 04, 2022
`
`Mark Information
`
`Goods and Services
`
`Notice of Allowance Date: Mar. 01, 2022
`
`
`
`Feedback
`
`Note:
`The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services:
`Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services;
`Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 af
`Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services.
`For: Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Mineral supplements; Nutritional supplements
`
`fidavit of incontestability; and
`
`International Class(es): 005 - Primary Class
`
`U.S Class(es): 005, 006, 018, 044, 046, 051, 052
`
`Class Status: ACTIVE
`
`First Use: Aug. 22, 2022
`
`Basis Information (Case Level)
`
`Filed Use: No
`
`Filed ITU: Yes
`
`Filed 44D: No
`
`Filed 44E: No
`
`Filed 66A: No
`
`Filed No Basis: No
`
`Current Owner(s) Information
`
`Owner Name: O Positiv , Inc.
`
`Owner Address:11740 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 109-333
`Los Angeles, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 90049
`
`Use in Commerce: Aug. 22, 2022
`
`Currently Use: Yes
`
`Currently ITU: No
`
`Currently 44D: No
`
`Currently 44E: No
`
`Currently 66A: No
`
`Currently No Basis: No
`
`https://tsdr.u spto.gov /#caseNu mber=6902704+&caseSearchTy pe=US_APPLICATION&caseTy pe=DEFAULT&searchTy pe=statu sSearch
`
`1/2
`
`

`

`11/8/24, 8:58 AM
`
`Legal Entity T ype:CORPORATION
`
`Statu s Search SN 6902704
`
`State or Country Where
`Organized:
`
`DELAWARE
`
`Attorney/Correspondence Information
`
`Prosecution History
`
`TM Staff and Location Information
`
`Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load
`
`Proceedings - Click to Load
`
`Feedback
`
`https://tsdr.u spto.gov /#caseNu mber=6902704+&caseSearchTy pe=US_APPLICATION&caseTy pe=DEFAULT&searchTy pe=statu sSearch
`
`2/2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit B
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`xfa (10untead)-rsm@gandaleg. x|@ JPublicRelations-Northst©» CPPS| Prostatitis Treatment’ x Q Trademark Search x | @ Document Search SN 98392 x | @ USPTOTSDRCase Viewer x | +
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`>
`@
`23
`sunnbiolabs.com/products/urolo-q-30-day-supply-1-bottle-59-99
`‘G Gmail (| YouTube
`9 Maps
`
`
`
`
`
`PROSTATE HEALTH
`
`BLADDER
`
`URINARY
`
`HEART
`
`SEXUAL HEALTH
`
`BONE
`
`MULTIVITAMINS
`
`IMMUNE HEALTH
`
`HOME
`
`>
`
`
`
`UROLO-Q - 30-Day Supply
`
`$49.99
`© One-time purchase: $59.99
`®@ Subscribe & Save (16.67%): $49.99
`Deliver every month »
`
`
`wePoe
`
`
`
`
`=
`
`G Subscriptiondetails
`
`oo *
`
`Email toa Friend
`
`
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`REVIEWS
`
`INGREDIENTS
`
`FAQ
`
`Traditional Chronic Prostatitis treatmentslike strong antibiotics are often ineffective and comewith dangerousside effects. UROLO-Qoffers an efficacious option for
`alleviating prostate symptomsassociated with chronic prostatitis, CPPS, dysuria, pelvic pain and/orgenital discomfortespecially for men who havetried prostate
`supplements and are seeking additional anti-inflammatorysupport. UROLO-Qofferstime release technology and extra strength anti-inflammatory power. Additionally,
`for mensuffering from symptomsassociated with the urinary flow and functionoften affiliated with BPH, and/or nocturia, UROLO-Q'santi-inflammatory action may
`provide relief while also promotinggeneralprostatehealth.
`Details
`¥ Scientifically proven and recommended byphysicians worldwide
`¥_ TimeRelease Formula
`¥ ActivatedQuercetinand PollenExtractComplex
`
`@
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit C
`
`
`
`https://www.sunnbiolabs.com/pages/sunn-about-us, last accessed Nov. 8, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket