`
`ESTTA1402669
`
`Filing date:
`
`12/17/2024
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`91294398
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Defendant
`Forgen AI, LLC
`
`JAMES DOUGLAS STEVENS JR
`REISING ETHINGTON P.C.
`755 WEST BIG BEAVER RD.
`SUITE 1850
`TROY, MI 48084
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: james@reising.com
`248-689-3500 x173
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Richard W. Hoffmann
`
`hoffmann@reising.com
`
`/Richard W. Hoffmann/
`
`12/17/2024
`
`Attachments
`
`Forgen AI Answer Final Signed.pdf(79662 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`)
`) Opposition No. 91294398
`)
`) Application Serial No. 98/251656
`)
`
`)
`) Mark: FORGEN
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORGEN, LLC,
`
` Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`FORGEN AI, LLC,
`
` Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICANT FORGEN AI, LLC’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE
`DEFENSES TO OPPOSER’S NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Applicant, Forgen AI, LLC (“Forgen AI”), a Michigan limited liability company having
`
`an address at 636 Cherry Ct., Birmingham, MI 48009, by and through its attorneys of record, in
`
`accordance with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure (“TBMP”) and the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”), answers Opposer, Forgen, LLC’s (hereafter
`
`“Opposer”) Notice of Opposition as follows:
`
`1. Applicant seeks to register FORGEN as a service mark for technology consultation in
`
`the field of artificial intelligence; technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI)
`
`software customization; consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable
`
`software and applications; computer software consulting in the field of generative ai software;
`
`research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; providing temporary use of online non-
`
`downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversations; providing online non-
`
`downloadable computer software platforms using generative ai for text generation; providing
`
`
`
`online non-downloadable computer software platforms using generative ai for text messaging and
`
`word processing; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using ai for generating
`
`text; SAAS services featuring software using ai large language models for understanding text input
`
`from a user; SAAS services featuring computer chatbot software using ai for simulating
`
`conversations (the “Class 42 Services”).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition.
`
`2. Applicant filed the application on November 2, 2023, based on Applicant’s alleged
`
`bona fide intent to use the mark for the Class 42 Services.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition.
`
`3. Forgen is one of the largest self-performing environmental, geotechnical, flood
`
`control, and ecosystem restoration contractors in the United States.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`4. Forgen has been using the FORGEN mark in U.S. commerce since at least as early as
`
`February 2020 and has established common law rights through its exclusive use in connection with
`
`geotechnical and civil construction services, wild fire and disaster clean-up services, removal of
`
`debris/soil/remediation, environmental remediation services, and technical consulting in the field
`
`of disaster clean-up services, namely site assessments.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`5. Forgen owns U.S. App. No. 98121907 for FORGEN in International Class 37 for
`
`geotechnical construction services, namely deep foundations, including slurry walls, soil
`
`stabilization, and soil improvement; civil construction services, namely earth work including
`
`grading, dam and levee construction, wetlands, stream and channel restoration; excavation
`
`services; construction project management services; wild fire clean-up services; disaster clean-up
`
`services, namely environmental remediation, removal and stabilization of soil, environmental
`
`containment of soil, localization and consolidating of soil, site assessments (TSDR record attached
`
`as Exhibit 1).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`6. Forgen owns U.S. App. No. 98121918 for FORGEN in International Class 39 for
`
`disaster response services, namely, removal of debris, soil, and vegetation and International Class
`
`40 for environmental remediation services, namely, treatment of soil (TSDR record attached as
`
`Exhibit 2).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`7. Forgen owns U.S. App. No. 98121911 for
`
` in International Class 37 for
`
`geotechnical construction services, namely deep foundations, including slurry walls, soil
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`stabilization, and soil improvement; civil construction services, namely earth work including
`
`grading, dam and levee construction, wetlands, stream and channel restoration; excavation
`
`services; construction project management services; wild fire clean-up services; disaster clean-up
`
`services, namely environmental remediation, removal and stabilization of soil, environmental
`
`containment of soil, localization and consolidating of soil, site assessments (TSDR record attached
`
`as Exhibit 3).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`8. Forgen owns U.S. App. No. 98121916 for
`
` in International Class 39 for
`
`disaster response services, namely, removal of debris, soil, and vegetation and International Class
`
`40 for environmental remediation services, namely, treatment of soil (TSDR record attached as
`
`Exhibit 4).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`9. 9. U.S. App. Nos. 98121907, 98121918, 98121911, and 98121916 were all filed
`
`before the Application was filed and all claim first use dates of February 2020. The services
`
`identified in U.S. App. Nos. 98121907, 98121918, 98121911, and 98121916 and in ¶5 are
`
`collectively referred to as “Forgen’s Services.”
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of the Notice of
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`10. Through its continuous and exclusive use in commerce and as a result of marketing,
`
`promotion, advertising, and sales activity, Forgen’s distinctive FORGEN mark has achieved
`
`recognition among the consuming public, has come to symbolize Forgen’s goodwill and
`
`reputation, and is strongly associated with Forgen.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`11. Forgen’s common law rights in the FORGEN mark predate the Application’s filing
`
`date by over four years.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`12. As a result of Forgen’s efforts, years before Applicant filed the Application, Forgen’s
`
`FORGEN mark was substantially recognized by the public as a strong indicator of Forgen’s
`
`Services.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant is without sufficient information upon which to
`
`form a belief as to the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`13. Applicant’s applied-for FORGEN mark is confusingly similar in sight, sound, and
`
`commercial impression to Forgen’s FORGEN mark because it is identical.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 13
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`14. The applied-for Class 42 Services are related to Forgen’s Services because Forgen
`
`provides technical consultation as part and parcel of its engineering and disaster response services
`
`including site assessments, for example. Additionally, the Class 42 services are of a type that can
`
`be used in conjunction with or in the provision of Forgen’s Services. For example, “technology
`
`consultation in the field of artificial intelligence” can be used for the purpose of improving the
`
`construction services and environmental remediation services Forgen renders. This is especially
`
`true because most companies are currently incorporating artificial intelligence into their goods and
`
`services.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 14
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`15. Applicant’s FORGEN-branded services will directly compete with Forgen’s
`
`FORGEN-branded services and will be offered to the same types of consumers.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 15
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`16. Applicant’s FORGEN-branded services will be provided through the same trade
`
`channels as Forgen’s FORGEN-branded services.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 16
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`17. Because the marks are identical and the Applicant’s services are related to Forgen’s
`
`Services, the public is likely to incorrectly believe that Applicant’s FORGEN-branded services are
`
`connected to Forgen. This confusion will cause irreparable harm to Forgen.
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 17
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`18. Any dissatisfaction with Applicant’s Class 42 Services will reflect negatively upon
`
`and irreparably damage Forgen’s reputation and the goodwill embodied in its FORGEN mark.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 18
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`19. Applicant’s use and registration of the applied-for mark is likely to cause confusion,
`
`mistake, and deception as to the source of Applicant’s Class 42 Services within the meaning of 15
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125(a).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 19
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`20. Applicant’s use and registration of the applied-for mark will injure and damage Forgen
`
`and the goodwill and reputation symbolized by Forgen’s FORGEN mark within the meaning of
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1063(a).
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 20
`
`of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`21. Applicant’s applied-for mark is not registrable under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), because it
`
`resembles a mark previously used in the United States by Forgen and is likely to cause confusion,
`
`mistake, or to deceive.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies the allegation contained in Paragraph 21
`
`of the Notice of Opposition
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`22. Forgen respectfully requests that this opposition be sustained and registration of U.S.
`
`Application Serial No. 98251656 be refused.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER: Applicant denies that Forgen is entitled to any relief.
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`1. Opposer cannot demonstrate any likelihood that the public will be confused or misled
`
`as to the source of Applicant’s goods, or that Applicant’s goods are associated with or endorsed
`
`by Opposer.
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
` WHEREFORE, Applicant, Forgen AI, respectfully prays that:
`
`a)
`
` the Opposition be dismissed and that this Opposition be sustained in favor of the
`
`Applicant and that Applicant’s mark, Application Serial No. 98/251656, be permitted to proceed
`
`to registration; and
`
`b)
`
`it be awarded such further relief as this Board deems just and proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 16, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Richard W. Hoffmann/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RICHARD W. HOFFMANN (MI Bar No. P42352)
`JAMES D. STEVENS JR. (MI Bar No. 82081)
`Reising Ethington P.C.
`755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1850
`Troy, Michigan 48084
`Telephone: 248-689-3500
`Facsimile: 248-689-4071
`hoffmann@reising.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Applicant Forgen AI
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on the 17th day of December 2024, the APPLICANT FORGEN
`
`AI, LLC’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO OPPOSER’S NOTICE OF
`
`OPPOSITION ; and CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE were served on the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Email to:
`gtipmail@gtlaw.com
`Amy.Kramer@gtlaw.com
`vandykek@gtlaw.com
`strackk@gtlaw.com
`
`
`Amy L. Kramer, Esq
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`1144 15TH Street,Suite 3300
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: (303) 572-6500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Richard W. Hoffmann/
`RICHARD W. HOFFMANN
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site