ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`ESTTA1380338
`08/28/2024
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer information
`
`Name
`
`Microsoft Corporation
`
`Granted to date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`08/28/2024
`
`ONE MICROSOFT WAY
`REDMOND, WA 98052
`UNITED STATES
`
`JOHN L. KRIEGER
`DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
`3883 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAY, SUITE 800
`LAS VEGAS, NV 89169
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: Jkrieger@dickinson-wright.com
`Secondary email(s): amoretto@dickinson-wright.com, trademark-
`slv@dickinson-wright.com, slnorton@dickinson-wright.com, CVil-
`lanueva@dickinson-wright.com
`702-550-4400
`
`Docket no.
`
`26008-30019
`
`Applicant information
`
`Application no.
`
`98089617
`
`08/28/2024
`
`Opposition filing
`date
`
`Applicant
`
`Publication date
`
`04/30/2024
`
`Opposition period
`ends
`
`08/28/2024
`
`EDGE Games Inc
`225 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE, SUITE 300
`PASADENA, CA 91101
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/services affected by opposition
`
`Class 009. First Use: Jun 1, 1984 First Use In Commerce: Jun 1, 1984
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Computer game programmes download-
`able via the Internet; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Down-
`loadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable video and
`computer game programs; Recorded computer game software
`
`Grounds for opposition
`
`The mark is merely descriptive
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1)
`
`No use of mark in commerce before application,
`amendment to allege use, or statement of use
`was due
`
`Trademark Act Section 1(a) and (c)
`
`

`

`Fraud on the USPTO
`
`In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d
`1938 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
`
`Attachments
`
`PUBLIC - Notice of Opposition - CUTTING EDGE_Redacted.pdf(149263 bytes )
`PUBLIC - EXHIBIT 1 TO CUTTING EDGE OPPOSITION.pdf(98184 bytes )
`EXHIBIT 2 TO CUTTING EDGE OPPOSITION - Application - Sn. 98089617.pdf
`(156984 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/John L. Krieger/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`JOHN L. KRIEGER
`
`08/28/2024
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`EDGE GAMES INC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`Mark: CUTTING EDGE
`Serial No. 98/089,617
`Published: April 30, 2024
`Class: 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`Applicant.
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1063 and 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.101 and 2.104(a), Microsoft
`
`Corporation, a Washington corporation, with its principal place of business at One Microsoft
`
`Way, Redmond, WA 98052 (“Opposer”), believes it will be damaged by the registration of the
`
`above-referenced mark in International Class 09 for “Computer game programmes downloadable
`
`via the Internet; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network;
`
`Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable
`
`video and computer game programs; Recorded computer game software” (Serial No. 98/089617)
`
`(such application, the “Opposed Application,” and such mark, the “Opposed Mark”), which was
`
`published on April 30, 2024, and hereby opposes the same.
`
`As grounds for its opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS
`
`1.
`
`Edge Games Inc (“Applicant” or “Edge Games”) and its CEO, Tim Langdell
`
`(“Langdell”), have a history of perpetrating fraud before the PTO, intentionally misleading
`
`courts of law and trademark registries, and abusing legal procedure, including filing unwarranted
`
`opposition and cancellation proceedings.
`
`2.
`
`In fact, Edge Games has been deemed a trademark “troll” by a United States
`
`federal court. Edge Games, Inc. v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 745 F. Supp. 2d 1101, 1117 (N.D. Cal. 2010).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`3.
`
`The court in Edge Games, Inc. v. Elec. Arts, Inc. specifically noted that the record
`
`revealed “numerous items of evidence that [Edge Games] willfully committed fraud against the
`
`USPTO in obtaining and/or maintaining registrations for many of the asserted “EDGE” marks,
`
`possibly warranting criminal penalties if the misrepresentations prove true.” Id. at 1115. Further,
`
`the court held that many of the representations made by Langdell in his declaration with regard
`
`to Edge Games’ alleged licensees and use were “materially misleading or downright false.” Id.
`
`4.
`
`Over the course of another proceeding pending before the Board, Microsoft
`
`discovered that the scope of Edge Games’ and Langdell’s fraudulent activity has extended to the
`
`Opposed Mark.
`
`5.
`
`Specifically, Microsoft uncovered evidence that Edge Games committed fraud
`
`against the PTO when it filed the Opposed Application to register the Opposed Mark without
`
`informing the PTO of the fact that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`On July 18, 2023, Edge Games filed a use-based application for the Opposed
`
`Mark in Class 9 for “Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Computer
`
`game software downloadable from a global computer network; Downloadable computer game
`
`software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable video and computer game
`
`programs; Recorded computer game software.”
`
`9.
`
`The Opposed Application was approved for publication on April 30, 2024.
`
`

`

`10.
`
`Opposer filed a 30-day extension of time to oppose on May 30, 2024 and a 60-
`
`Day extension of time to oppose on June 24, 2024, which were both granted and extended the
`
`deadline to oppose to August 28, 2024. As such, this Opposition is timely filed.
`
`11.
`
`The Opposed Application was fraudulently filed, namely, Edge Games and
`
`Langdell swore under penalty of perjury that Edge Games was entitled to use the marks in
`
`commerce and that no other person had a right to use the marks in commerce,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Further, while Edge Games alleged a date of first use of June 1, 1984, upon
`
`information and belief, Edge Games had no actual use of the Opposed Mark as of that date.
`
`13. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges, Edge Games
`
`manufactured the evidence of “use” to procure the registration, which does not reflect an actual
`
`and bona fide use in commerce for the goods identified in the Opposed Application.
`
`14. Microsoft’s investigation has not located any evidence of an actual, bona fide, and
`
`ongoing use of the Opposed Mark by Edge Games.
`
`15. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges, Edge Games has not
`
`used the Opposed Mark in interstate commerce.
`
`16.
`
`Further, the term “cutting edge”, which makes up the entirety of the Opposed
`
`Mark, is merely descriptive of the video and computer game software goods identified in the
`
`Opposed Application.
`
`17.
`
`The term “cutting edge” is defined as being at the forefront or lead. As such, the
`
`Opposed Mark directly conveys to the relevant purchasing public an immediate idea of a quality,
`
`characteristic or feature of the goods sold by Applicant —that the video and computer game
`
`software is at the forefront of technology.
`
`18. Moreover, on or about January 9, 2023, Edge Games filed a Petition for
`
`Cancellation seeking to cancel Microsoft’s registration for BLEEDING EDGE (Reg. No.
`
`5,766,386) based, in part, on Edge Games’ alleged rights in the Opposed Mark. (See Edge
`
`

`

`Games, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Cancellation No. 92081334, TTABVUE 9, ¶¶ 18, 23.)
`
`19. Microsoft has been damaged and will continue to be damaged should the Opposed
`
`Mark register, and therefore has standing to bring this action.
`
`COUNT I: FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT – MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION
`
`20. Microsoft incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.
`
`21.
`
`Edge Games fraudulently obtained
`
`its registration by making material
`
`misrepresentations of fact to the PTO in connection with the application for the Opposed Mark,
`
`which it knew were false and its misrepresentations were made with the intent to deceive the
`
`PTO.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23.
`
`In applying for the Opposed Mark, Edge Games knowingly made false, material
`
`misrepresentations of fact by representing under oath in the Opposed Application that “the
`
`applicant believes the applicant is the owner of the mark” and did so with the willful intent to
`
`deceive the PTO for the purposes of obtaining a registration.
`
`24. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Edge Games’ false
`
`statements made under the penalty of perjury that Edge Games was the owner of the mark was a
`
`material misrepresentation, because without such a statement, the PTO would not issue a
`
`registration for the Opposed Mark.
`
`25.
`
`Based on the foregoing, Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges
`
`the statements made by Applicant in the Opposed Application constitutes a fraud on the PTO.
`
`26. Microsoft has suffered and will continue to suffer damage if the Opposed Mark is
`
`not refused registration.
`
`COUNT II: FRAUD IN THE PROCUREMENT – FALSE STATEMENT OF USE
`
`27. Microsoft incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.
`
`28.
`
`In the Opposed Application, a true and correct copy of which is attached as
`
`Exhibit 2, Edge Games’ CEO, Langdell, on Edge Games’ behalf, represented to the PTO that
`
`

`

`Edge Games was actively using the Opposed Mark in commerce in connection with all the goods
`
`identified in the Opposed Application as of the filing date.
`
`29.
`
`Edge Games was not using the Opposed Mark in commerce in connection with all
`
`the goods listed in the Opposed Application as of the application filing date.
`
`30.
`
`The “use” representation was false at the time Langdell signed the declaration on
`
`Edge Games’ behalf.
`
`31.
`
`Edge Games and Langdell knew the “use” representation was false at the time
`
`Langdell executed the declaration because Langdell knew Edge Games did not sell any computer
`
`programs or gaming software using the Opposed Mark as of the date the Opposed Application
`
`was filed.
`
`32.
`
`The false “use” representation was material because, but for the false
`
`representation, the PTO would not have approved Edge Games’ use-based application for
`
`registration of the Opposed Mark.
`
`33.
`
`Edge Games and Langdell made the false “use” representation with the intent to
`
`mislead the PTO and cause it to issue a registration for the Opposed Mark.
`
`34.
`
`Based on the foregoing, Edge Games filed the Opposed Application fraudulently,
`
`which is grounds to oppose registration of the Opposed Mark in its entirety.
`
`35. Microsoft has been and will continue to be harmed should the Opposed Mark
`
`register because Edge Games is relying on the Opposed Mark to assert its alleged rights against
`
`Microsoft.
`
`COUNT III: NON-USE/ABANDONMENT
`
`36. Microsoft incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.
`
`37. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Edge Games is not
`
`using, nor has it ever used, the Opposed Mark in commerce as defined in the Lanham Act.
`
`38. Microsoft has been unable to identify any current, actual use or continuous use of
`
`the Opposed Mark.
`
`

`

`39.
`
`To the extent Edge Games may have ever used the Opposed Mark in interstate
`
`commerce in connection with the goods recited in the Opposed Application, Edge Games has
`
`discontinued any such use of the Opposed Mark in connection with the recited goods.
`
`40. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges, Edge Games has never
`
`used the Opposed Mark in interstate commerce.
`
`41. Microsoft is informed and believes and thereupon alleges, there is no evidence
`
`that Edge Games has any intention to use the Opposed Mark in commerce.
`
`42.
`
`Accordingly, Edge Games has either never commenced use or abandoned any use
`
`of the Opposed Mark and it should be denied registration of the Opposed Mark in its entirety.
`
`COUNT IV: MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
`
`43. Microsoft incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.
`
`44.
`
`As noted above, the term “cutting edge”, which makes up the entirety of the
`
`Opposed Mark, is merely descriptive of the video and computer game software goods identified
`
`in the Opposed Application.
`
`45.
`
`The term “cutting edge” is defined as being at the forefront or lead.
`
`46.
`
`As such, the Opposed Mark directly conveys to the relevant purchasing public a
`
`quality, characteristic or feature of the goods allegedly sold by Applicant—that the video and
`
`computer game software is at the forefront of technology.
`
`47.
`
`The Opposed Mark has not acquired secondary meaning for the goods listed in
`
`the Opposed Application.
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`
`
`

`

`48.
`
`As the Opposed Mark is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning for the
`
`goods covered by the Opposed Application, Applicant’s Mark cannot be registered on the
`
`Principal Register and should be refused registration under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays the Opposed Application (Serial No. 98/089,617) for the
`
`Opposed Mark be refused and not allowed to register, and that the Board sustain this Opposition.
`
`Dated: August 28, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
`
`/John L. Krieger/_____________
`John L. Krieger, Esq.
`Cindy A. Villanueva, Esq.
`jkrieger@dickinsonwright.com
`cvillanueva@dickinsonwright.com
`trademarkslv@dickinsonwright.com
`amoretto@dickinsonwright.com
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 800
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`(702) 550-4400 (phone)
`
`
`

`

`MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. EDGE GAMES INC
`OPPOSITION NO.
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`(Filed under seal)
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. EDGE GAMES INC
`OPPOSITION NO.
`
`

`

`MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. EDGE GAMES INC
`OPPOSITION NO.
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. EDGE GAMES INC
`OPPOSITION NO.
`
`

`

`PTO- 1478
`
`Approved for use through 10/31/2024. OMB 0651-0009
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number
`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`TEAS Plus Application
`
`Serial Number: 98089617
`Filing Date: 07/18/2023
`
`NOTE: Data fields with the * are mandatory under TEAS Plus. The wording "(if applicable)" appears where the field is only mandatory
`under the facts of the particular application.
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Input Field
`
`Entered
`
`TEAS Plus
`
`MARK INFORMATION
`
`*MARK
`
`*STANDARD CHARACTERS
`
`USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`*MARK STATEMENT
`
`REGISTER
`
`APPLICANT INFORMATION
`
`*OWNER OF MARK
`
`*MAILING ADDRESS
`
`*CITY
`
`*STATE
`(Required for U.S. applicants)
`
`YES
`
`CUTTING EDGE
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`CUTTING EDGE
`
`The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any
`particular font style, size, or color.
`
`Principal
`
`EDGE Games Inc
`
`225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 300
`
`Pasadena
`
`California
`
`*COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY
`
`United States
`
`*ZIP/POSTAL CODE
`(Required for U.S. and certain international addresses)
`
`PHONE
`
`FAX
`
`*EMAIL ADDRESS
`
`WEBSITE ADDRESS
`
`91101
`
`6268240097
`
`6268444334
`
`XXXX
`
`www.edgegames.com
`
`LEGAL ENTITY INFORMATION
`
`*TYPE
`
`CORPORATION
`
`* STATE/COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY OF
`INCORPORATION
`
`California
`
`GOODS AND/OR SERVICES AND BASIS INFORMATION
`
`

`

`* INTERNATIONAL CLASS
`
`009 
`
`*IDENTIFICATION
`
`*FILING BASIS
`
`       FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
`
`       FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
`
`       SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S)
`
`       JPG FILE(S)
`
`       ORIGINAL PDF FILE
`
`       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
`       (2 pages)
`
`Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet;
`Computer game software downloadable from a global
`computer network; Downloadable computer game software for
`use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable video and
`computer game programs; Recorded computer game software
`
`SECTION 1(a)
`
`At least as early as 06/01/1984
`
`At least as early as 06/01/1984
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT
`18\980\896\98089617\xml1 \ FTK0003.JPG
`
`SPE0-260017005880812040ce 6e802d7b66ef-202307181216
`19228283_._Webpage_Specim en.pdf
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT
`18\980\896\98089617\xml1\ FTK0004.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT
`18\980\896\98089617\xml1\ FTK0005.JPG
`
`       SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
`
`CUTTING EDGE mark used to promote our games on our
`website and print out of webpage
`
`        WEBPAGE URL
`
`http://www.edgegames.com
`
`        WEBPAGE DATE OF ACCESS
`
`07/18/2023
`
`ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS INFORMATION
`
`*TRANSLATION
`(if applicable)
`
`*TRANSLITERATION
`(if applicable)
`
`*CLAIMED PRIOR REGISTRATION
`(if applicable)
`
`*CONSENT (NAME/LIKENESS)
`(if applicable)
`
`*CONCURRENT USE CLAIM
`(if applicable)
`
`CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION
`
`NAME
`
`DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER
`
`EDGE Games Inc
`
`CUTEDG23
`
`PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE
`
`edgegames@gmail.com
`
`SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES)
`
`uspto@edgegames.com; timlangdell@gmail.com
`
`FEE INFORMATION
`
`APPLICATION FILING OPTION
`
`NUMBER OF CLASSES
`
`APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION PER CLASS
`
`*TOTAL FEES DUE
`
`*TOTAL FEES PAID
`
`TEAS Plus
`
`1
`
`250
`
`250
`
`250
`
`

`

`SIGNATURE INFORMATION
`
`* SIGNATURE
`
`* SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`* SIGNATORY'S POSITION
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER
`
`* DATE SIGNED
`
`SIGNATURE METHOD
`
`/Tim Langdell/
`
`Tim Langdell
`
`CEO
`
`626-824-0097
`
`07/18/2023
`
`Signed directly within the form
`
`

`

`PTO- 1478
`
`Approved for use through 10/31/2024. OMB 0651-0009
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number
`

`
`Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
`
`TEAS Plus Application
`
`Serial Number: 98089617
`Filing Date: 07/18/2023
`
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`MARK: CUTTING EDGE (Standard Characters, see mark)
`The literal element of the mark consists of CUTTING EDGE. The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style,
`size, or color.
`The applicant, EDGE Games Inc, a corporation of California, having an address of
`      225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 300
`      Pasadena, California 91101
`      United States
`      6268240097(phone)
`      6268444334(fax)
`      XXXX
`
`requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register
`established by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended, for the following:
`
`For specific filing basis information for each item, you must view the display within the Input Table.
`International Class 009:  Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Computer game software downloadable from a global
`computer network; Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable video and computer game
`programs; Recorded computer game software
`
`Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services. The applicant attaches, or
`will later submit, one specimen as a JPG/PDF image file showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class of
`listed goods/services, regardless of whether the mark itself is in the standard character format or is a stylized or design mark. The specimen image
`file may be in color, and the image must be in color if color is being claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`In International Class 009, the mark was first used by the applicant or the applicant's related company or licensee predecessor in interest at least
`as early as 06/01/1984, and first used in commerce at least as early as 06/01/1984, and is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is
`submitting one(or more) specimen(s) showing the mark as used in commerce on or in connection with any item in the class of listed
`goods/services, consisting of a(n) CUTTING EDGE mark used to promote our games on our website and print out of webpage.
`JPG file(s):
`Specimen File1
`Original PDF file:
`SPE0-260017005880812040ce 6e802d7b66ef-202307181216 19228283_._Webpage_Specim en.pdf
`Converted PDF file(s) (2 pages)
`Specimen File1
`Specimen File2
`
`Webpage URL: http://www.edgegames.com
`Webpage Date of Access: 07/18/2023
`
`For informational purposes only, applicant's website address is: www.edgegames.com
`The applicant's current Correspondence Information:
`
`      EDGE Games Inc
`
`       PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: edgegames@gmail.com
`       SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): uspto@edgegames.com; timlangdell@gmail.com
`The docket/reference number is CUTEDG23.
`
`

`

`Requirement for Email and Electronic Filing: I understand that a valid email address must be maintained by the applicant owner/holder and
`the applicant owner's/holder's attorney, if appointed, and that all official trademark correspondence must be submitted via the Trademark
`Electronic Application System (TEAS).
`A fee payment in the amount of $250 has been submitted with the application, representing payment for 1 class(es).
`
`Basis:
`If the applicant is filing the application based on use in commerce under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a):
`
`Declaration
`
`The signatory believes that the applicant is the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered;
`The mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application on or in connection with the
`goods/services in the application;
`The specimen(s) shows the mark as used on or in connection with the goods/services in the application and was used on or in
`connection with the goods/services in the application as of the application filing date; and
`To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, the facts recited in the application are accurate.
`
`And/Or
`If the applicant is filing the application based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b), § 1126(d),
`and/or § 1126(e):
`
`The signatory believes that the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce;
`The applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as
`of the application filing date on or in connection with the goods/services in the application; and
`To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, the facts recited in the application are accurate.
`
`To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the
`mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the
`goods/services of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
`
`To the best of the signatory's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, the
`allegations and other factual contentions made above have evidentiary support.
`
`The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §
`1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration
`resulting therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and
`belief are believed to be true.
`
`Declaration Signature
`
`Signature: /Tim Langdell/   Date: 07/18/2023
`Signatory's Name: Tim Langdell
`Signatory's Position: CEO
`Signatory's Phone Number: 626-824-0097
`Signature method: Signed directly within the form
`Payment Sale Number: 98089617
`Payment Accounting Date: 07/18/2023
`
`Serial Number: 98089617
`Internet Transmission Date: Tue Jul 18 12:27:11 ET 2023
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/FTK-XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:
`XXXX:XXXX-20230718122713245104-98089617-
`86021c942bcdfeb07231e1d6b175aeaffe9cb04f
`65e8ca49a359a0d0a585d1866e-CC-27116842-2
`0230718121619228283
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket