`
`ESTTA1379442
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/25/2024
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`91293092
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Defendant
`Huang Youbin
`
`XIAOFANG ZHONG
`244 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE V284
`NEW YORK, NY 10001
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: docket1.zhong@gmail.com
`646-785-1788
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Xiaofang Zhong
`
`xzhong@zhonglaws.com
`
`/Xiaofang Zhong/
`
`08/25/2024
`
`Attachments
`
`AnswerOpposition.pdf(122190 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No.: 91293092
`
`Mark: BOSSAND
`
`Serial No. 98153779
`
`
`
`HUGO BOSS AG
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Huang Youbin
`
`
`
`
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`|
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`|
`
`Applicant.
`__________________________________________|
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`Applicant Huang Youbin hereby answers the notice of opposition of Opposer HUGO BOSS
`
`AG as following
`
`1. Answering paragraph 1 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`2. Answering paragraph 2 of the notice of Opposition, the records of the USPTO speak for
`
`themselves.
`
`3. Answering paragraph 3 of the notice of Opposition, the records of the USPTO speak for
`
`themselves.
`
`4. Answering paragraph 4 of the notice of Opposition, the records of the USPTO speak for
`
`themselves.
`
`5. Answering paragraph 5 of the notice of Opposition. Opposer does not have paragraph 5.
`
`6. Answering paragraph 6 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`7. Answering paragraph 7 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`8. Answering paragraph 8 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`9. Answering paragraph 9 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`10. Answering paragraph 10 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`11. Answering paragraph 11 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`12. Answering paragraph 12 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13. Answering paragraph 13 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`14. Answering paragraph 14 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`15. Answering paragraph 15 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not need to answer.
`
`16. Answering paragraph 16 of the notice of Opposition, the records of the USPTO speak for
`
`themselves.
`
`17. Answering paragraph 17 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`18. Answering paragraph 18 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant’s BOSSAND only has
`
`the first four letters which are same as Opposer’s mark, Applicant’s Mark has 3 more
`
`letters combine with the first four letters as Applicant Mark, Applicant’s Mark does not
`
`convey a highly similar overall commercial impression as Opposer’s BOSS Marks.
`
`Applicant denies the allegation thereof.
`
`19. Answering paragraph 19 of the notice of Opposition. Upon information and belief. There
`
`are other registered Marks with BOSS letters. Applicant denies the allegation thereof.
`
`20. Answering paragraph 20 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant admits.
`
`21. Answering paragraph 21 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`22. Answering paragraph 22 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`23. Answering paragraph 23 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`
`
`24. Answering paragraph 24 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`25. Answering paragraph 25 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`26. Answering paragraph 26 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`27. Answering paragraph 27 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`28. Answering paragraph 28 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation,
`
`29. Answering paragraph 29 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`30. Answering paragraph 30 of the notice of Opposition. does not need to answer.
`
`31. Answering paragraph 31 of the notice of Opposition, Applicant does not have sufficient
`
`knowledge or information to form a belief as to the allegation contained therein and
`
`accordingly denies the allegation.
`
`32. Answering paragraph 32 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`33. Answering paragraph 33 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`34. Answering paragraph 34 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`35. Answering paragraph 35 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`36. Answering paragraph 36 of the notice of Opposition. Applicant denies the allegation.
`
`
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`37. No likelihood of confusion exists between Applicant’s use of its BOSSAND Mark and
`
`Opposer’s use of its alleged BOSS Mark.
`
`38. Applicant reserves the right to rely on such other and further defenses as may be
`
`supported by facts to be determined through comprehensive discovery and to amend its
`
`Answer accordingly to assert such defenses
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that the Trademark Trial and Appeal
`
`Board dismiss the Notice of Opposition, dated August 5, 2024, with prejudice and permit
`
`Application Serial No. 98153779 to proceed to registration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 25, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/Xiaofang Zhong
`
`Xiaofang Zhong
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
` Law Office of Xiaofang Zhong, PLLC
`
` 244 Fifth Avenue, Suite V284
`
` New York, N.Y. 10001
`
` Tel: 646-785-1788
`
` xzhong@zhonglaws.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Answer to Notice of
`Opposition has been served on:
`
`
`
`Sixtine Bousquet-Lambert
`
`by forwarding said copy on August 25, 2024, via email to:
`
`sixtine_bousquetlambert@hugoboss.com
`
`Signed: s/Xiaofang Zhong/
`
`Xiaofang Zhong
`
`Date: August 25, 2024
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site