`
`ESTTA1390506
`
`Filing date:
`
`10/18/2024
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`91292521
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Defendant
`Elmore, Jamie Rochelle
`
`REBECCA Y. MCCURRY
`PIRKEY BARBER PLLC
`1801 EAST 6TH STREET, SUITE 300
`AUSTIN, TX 78702
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: tmcentral@pirkeybarber.com
`Secondary email(s): rmccurry@pirkeybarber.com, jfalk@pirkeybarber.com
`No phone number provided
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Christopher M. Weimer
`
`tmcentral@pirkeybarber.com, rmccurry@pirkeybarber.com,
`cweimer@pirkeybarber.com, eolson@pirkeybarber.com
`
`/Christopher M. Weimer/
`
`10/18/2024
`
`Attachments
`
`Answer to Notice of Opposition.pdf(118918 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`HUGO BOSS AG,
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Opposition No. 91292521
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`JAMIE ROCHELLE ELMORE,
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER
`
`Pursuant to Trademark Rules 2.106 and 2.114, and TBMP §311, Applicant submits the
`
`following Answer in response to Opposer’s Notice of Opposition in this proceeding.
`
`With regard to the introductory paragraph, Applicant denies that Opposer is being or will
`
`be damaged by registration of the mark BALD BOSS as shown in Application Serial No.
`
`97911233. Applicant admits that the goods and services described in the paragraph for the
`
`Application are accurate, and that the Application was filed in the name of Jamie Rochelle Elmore.
`
`To the extent any further response is required, Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient
`
`to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in this paragraph, and therefore denies the same.
`
`1.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 1, and therefore denies the same.
`
`2.
`
`To the extent paragraph 2 states a legal conclusion about Opposer’s alleged
`
`“family” of marks, no response to the allegation is required, but it is denied. Applicant otherwise
`
`lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in
`
`paragraph 2, and therefore denies the same.
`
`3.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 3, and therefore denies the same.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 4, and therefore denies the same.
`
`5.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 5, and therefore denies the same.
`
`6.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 6, and therefore denies the same.
`
`7.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 7, and therefore denies the same.
`
`8.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 8, and therefore denies the same.
`
`9.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 9, and therefore denies the same.
`
`10.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 10, and therefore denies the same.
`
`11.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 11, and therefore denies the same.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth
`
`of the allegations in paragraph 12, and therefore denies the same.
`
`13.
`
`To the extent paragraph 13 states a legal conclusion about the recognition of
`
`Opposer’s marks, no response to the allegation is required, but it is denied. Applicant otherwise
`
`lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the allegations in
`
`paragraph 13, and therefore denies the same.
`
`14.
`
`Denied.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Paragraph 15 contains no factual allegations requiring a response.
`
`16.
`
`Admitted.
`
`17.
`
`Denied.
`
`18.
`
`Denied.
`
`19.
`
`Denied.
`
`20.
`
`Applicant admits that Opposer does not offer the services and/or goods sold by
`
`Applicant under Applicant’s mark. To the extent any further response is required, denied.
`
`21.
`
`Denied.
`
`22.
`
`Denied.
`
`23.
`
`Denied.
`
`24.
`
`Denied.
`
`25.
`
`Denied.
`
`26.
`
`Denied.
`
`27.
`
`Denied.
`
`28.
`
`Admitted that Applicant would obtain a registration if the Application is allowed
`
`to proceed. Otherwise denied.
`
`29.
`
`Denied.
`
`30.
`
`Paragraph 30 contains no factual allegations requiring a response.
`
`31.
`
`Denied.
`
`32.
`
`Denied.
`
`33.
`
`Denied.
`
`34.
`
`Denied.
`
`35.
`
`Denied.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`36.
`
`Denied.
`
`Applicant denies any further allegations or factual statements contained in the prayer of
`
`the Notice of Opposition. Applicant denies that Opposer is entitled to the relief requested in the
`
`unnumbered paragraph following the allegations in its notice of opposition.
`
`
`Date: October 18, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Christopher M. Weimer/
`Rebecca McCurry
`Christopher M. Weimer
`Pirkey Barber PLLC
`1801 E. 6th Street, Suite 300
`Austin, TX 78702
`Tel: (512) 322-5200
`rmccurry@pirkeybarber.com
`cweimer@pirkeybarber.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR OPPOSER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`This is to certify that on October 18, 2024, a copy of the foregoing APPLICANT’S
`
`ANSWER was served via email on Applicant’s attorney of record:
`
`Sixtine Bousquet-Lambert
`IP Legal Counsel HUGO BOSS Fashion Inc.
`55 Water Street, 48th floor
`New York, NY 10041 USA
`sixtine_bousquetlambert@hugoboss.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Christopher M. Weimer/
`
`
`4
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site