throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1250394
`11/28/2022
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer information
`
`Name
`
`Granted to date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`UATX, Inc.
`
`11/26/2022
`
`912 SOUTH CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY
`SUITE 180
`AUSTIN, TX 78746
`UNITED STATES
`
`PETE G. PAPPAS
`EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP
`999 PEACHTREE STREET, NE
`SUITE 2300
`ATLANTA, GA 30309
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: petepappas@eversheds-sutherland.com
`Secondary email(s): annfort@eversheds-sutherland.com, jennifersand-
`lin@eversheds-sutherland.com, marcellaburke@eversheds-sutherland.com,
`patentdocket@eversheds-sutherland.com
`4048538064
`
`Docket no.
`
`96112-0001
`
`Applicant information
`
`Application no.
`
`97120643
`
`11/28/2022
`
`Opposition filing
`date
`
`Applicant
`
`Publication date
`
`09/27/2022
`
`Opposition period
`ends
`
`11/26/2022
`
`University of Advancing Computer Technology, Inc.
`2625 W. BASELINE ROAD
`TEMPE, AZ 85283
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/services affected by opposition
`
`Class 041. First Use: Apr 2, 2020 First Use In Commerce: Apr 2, 2020
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Education services in the nature of courses
`at the university level; Educational services, namely, providing courses ofinstruction at the under-
`graduate, graduate and post-graduate level and distribution of course materials in connection there-
`with; Educational services, namely, providing online courses of instruction at the undergraduate,
`graduate and post-graduate level and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; Teach-
`ing, training, and courses of instruction at the undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate level;
`Providing information about education
`
`

`

`Grounds for opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`The mark is merely descriptive
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1)
`
`The mark is primarily geographically descriptive
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(e)(2)
`
`The mark is primarily geographically deceptively
`misdescriptive
`
`No use of mark in commerce before application,
`amendment to allege use, or statement of use
`was due
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(e)(3)
`
`Trademark Act Section 1(a) and (c)
`
`The mark is not inherently distinctive and has not
`acquired distinctiveness
`
`Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45; and Section
`2(f)
`
`False suggestion of a connection with persons,
`living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national
`symbols
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(a)
`
`Mark cited by opposer as basis for opposition
`
`U.S. application/ registration
`no.
`
`Register
`
`Registration date
`
`Mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`Application date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`UATX
`
`Educational services, namely, for undergraduate and graduate level
`students
`
`Attachments
`
`Notice of Opposition - UATX.pdf(1214707 bytes )
`Exhibit A to Notice of Opposition.pdf(1226845 bytes )
`Exhibit B to Notice of Opposition.pdf(1413876 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/Jennifer R. Sandlin/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Jennifer R. Sandlin
`
`11/28/2022
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UATX, Inc.
`
`Opposer
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`University of Advancing Computer
`Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Serial No. 97/120,643
`Opposition No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Opposer, UATX, Inc. (“Opposer”), organized and existing under the laws of Texas with a
`
`principal place of business at 912 South Capital of Texas Highway, Suite 180, Austin, TX 78746,
`
`owner of the common law trademark UATX™, which has been in use in commerce since at least
`
`as early as August 2021, believes that it will be damaged by the issuance of a registration for the
`
`alleged mark shown in Application Serial No. 97/120,643 in Class 41 (the “Application”), owned
`
`by University of Advancing Computer Technology, Inc. (“Applicant”) and filed on November 11,
`
`2021. Opposer hereby opposes the same pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act
`
`of 1946 (“Lanham Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1063(a).
`
`
`
`As grounds for opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`Opposer Background
`
`1.
`
`Opposer offers education services for undergraduate and graduate level students.
`
`Opposer offers a novel approach to higher education that focuses on the pursuit of truth and
`
`freedom of inquiry to further the skills and principles necessary to maintain a democratic society.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Opposer’s educational model seeks to reinvigorate intellectual curiosity, rigorous debate, and
`
`viewpoint diversity in the academy and offers an alternative approach to the nation’s increasingly
`
`illiberal colleges and universities.
`
`2.
`
`On July 20, 2021, UATX, Inc. was organized as a domestic nonprofit corporation
`
`under the laws of Texas. See Exhibit A for Opposer’s incorporation documents.
`
`3.
`
`On August 4, 2021, Opposer registered the domain name www.uaustin.org (the
`
`“UATX Website”), which uses the UATXTM mark in association with Opposer’s education
`
`services. Screenshots from www.archive.org of the UATX Website as of November 8, 2021 (the
`
`first date upon which the Internet Archive captured the site) are provided:
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`From July 21, 2021 to August 5, 2021, Opposer registered a series of domain names
`
`that incorporate the UATX™ mark, including “u-atx.org,” “ua-tx.com,” “ua-tx.org,” “uatx.co,”
`
`and “uatx.us.” Although no websites are currently hosted on these domain names, Opposer has a
`
`bona fide intent to use these domain names to promote its educational services under the UATX™
`
`brand.
`
`3
`
`

`

`5.
`
`In August 2021, Opposer registered a Twitter account with the handle
`
`“@uaustinorg” and utilizing the account name UATX™. Opposer uses its Twitter profile to
`
`advertise its services and post content that features the UATX™ mark. As of October 24, 2022,
`
`Opposer’s Twitter page had over 23,300 followers. A screenshot of the Opposer’s Twitter page,
`
`accessible at www.twitter.com/uaustinorg/, as of October 24, 2022, is provided:
`
`
`
`6.
`
`In October 2021, Opposer created an Instagram page with the handle
`
`“@uaustinorg” and utilizing the account name UATX™. Opposer uses its Instagram profile to
`
`advertise its services and post content that features the UATX™ mark. As of October 25, 2022,
`
`Opposer’s Instagram page had over 2,700 followers. A screenshot of the Opposer’s Instagram
`
`page, accessible at www.instagram.com/uaustinorg/, as of October 25, 2022, is provided:
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`7.
`
`On November 5, 2021, Opposer registered a Facebook account under the name
`
`UATX™. Opposer uses its Facebook profile to advertise its services and post content that features
`
`the UATX™ mark. As of October 24, 2022, Opposer’s Facebook page had over 1,200 followers.
`
`A screenshot of the Opposer’s Facebook page, accessible at www.facebook.com/uaustinorg/, as
`
`of October 24, 2022, is provided:
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`8.
`
`On November 8, 2021, Opposer launched a YouTube channel under the name
`
`UATX™. Opposer posts videos to this channel that feature the UATX™ mark in connection with
`
`Opposer’s education services. As of October 24, 2022, Opposer’s YouTube page had 54
`
`subscribers.
`
`
`
`Screenshots
`
`of
`
`the Opposer’s YouTube
`
`page,
`
`accessible
`
`at
`
`www.youtube.com/channel/UCDjuyYcHYC37Yb7HZBMqd7g, as of October 24, 2022, are
`
`provided:
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`9.
`
`Since 2021, Opposer has operated a LinkedIn company page under the name
`
`UATX™. Opposer uses its LinkedIn profile to advertise its services and post content that features
`
`the UATX™ mark. As of October 25, 2022, Opposer’s LinkedIn page had over 690 followers. A
`
`screenshot
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Opposer’s
`
`LinkedIn
`
`page,
`
`accessible
`
`at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/company/uaustinorg, as of October 25, 2022, is provided:
`
`
`
`10.
`
`The foregoing evidence establishes that since at least as early as July 2021, Opposer
`
`has used the UATX™ mark as a source identifier for Opposer’s higher education services.
`
`11.
`
`The foregoing evidence establishes that Opposer has used the UATXTM mark in
`
`interstate commerce in the United States consistently since at least as early as August 2021 in
`
`connection with the promotion of its UATXTM branded education services.
`
`Opposer’s Mark
`
`12.
`
`Opposer selected the UATXTM mark because it is an acronym for the “University
`
`of Austin,” a mark that is associated with Opposer and that Opposer intends to adopt as its trade
`
`name once proper authorization and accreditation are granted by the state of Texas.
`
`7
`
`

`

`13.
`
`The letter “U” is a recognized abbreviation for the word “University.” See, e.g.,
`
`“What Does U Stand For?,” Acronym Finder, https://www.acronymfinder.com/U.html (last
`
`visited Oct.
`
`25,
`
`2022);
`
`“What Does U
`
`Stand
`
`For?,”
`
`STANDS4 LLC,
`
`https://www.abbreviations.com/U (last visited Oct. 25, 2022).
`
`14.
`
`The letter combination “ATX” is a well-known abbreviation for the city of Austin,
`
`Texas.
`
`
`
`See,
`
`e.g.,
`
`“What Does ATX
`
`Stand
`
`For?,” Acronym
`
`Finder,
`
`https://www.acronymfinder.com/ATX.html (last visited Oct. 25, 2022); “ATX,” STANDS4 LLC,
`
`https://www.abbreviations.com/ATX (last visited Oct. 25, 2022).
`
`15.
`
`The letter combination “TX” is the standard two-letter postal abbreviation for the
`
`state of Texas. See “Appendix B: Two–Letter State and Possession Abbreviations,” U.S. Postal
`
`Service, https://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/28apb.htm (last visited Oct. 25, 2022).
`
`16.
`
`Acronyms are ubiquitous in the higher education industry. Consumers understand
`
`that these acronyms are used to describe the nature of the services offered, namely, higher
`
`education services, and the geographic location or first letters of the name of the educational
`
`institution. Due to limitations in letter combinations, consumers are accustomed to similar
`
`acronyms within the higher education industry to be associated with numerous sources. Thus, these
`
`acronyms are merely descriptive without additional distinctive elements, such as a logo or mascot,
`
`to assist in source identification and distinguishing between marks or without having gained
`
`acquired distinctiveness through significant publicity and advertising.
`
`17.
`
`As a merely descriptive abbreviation, “UATX” requires secondary meaning in the
`
`higher education services market to establish exclusive trademark rights and be eligible for
`
`registration.
`
`8
`
`

`

`18.
`
`Opposer and its UATXTM mark enjoy substantial recognition in the market for
`
`higher education services due to Opposer’s revolutionary approach to higher education, substantial
`
`press coverage, significant social media marketing, and Opposer’s highly accomplished and well-
`
`respected Founders and Board of Advisors.
`
`19.
`
`Opposer has garnered extensive domestic and international press coverage since its
`
`launch in 2021, including online interviews and articles, and has sparked rigorous debate over the
`
`purpose and function of higher education in the United States. Opposer, its education services,
`
`and the UATX™ mark have been discussed in some of the most prestigious and well-known
`
`publications in the United States and worldwide. Examples of press coverage include the
`
`following:
`
` The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/08/us/ut-austin-free-
`
`speech.html and https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/10/opinion/university-of-
`
`austin-colleges.html)
`
` The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/11/15/not-
`
`so-hidden-purpose-university-austin/ and
`
`https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/11/09/what-is-university-austins-
`
`purpose/);
`
` Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-11-08/niall-
`
`ferguson-america-s-woke-universities-need-to-be-replaced);
`
` The New York Post (https://nypost.com/2021/11/08/university-of-austin-founded-
`
`by-writers-and-entrepreneurs/ and https://nypost.com/2022/07/16/university-of-
`
`austin-students-share-anti-woke-forbidden-lessons/);
`
` Forbes (https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2021/11/08/heres-what-
`
`9
`
`

`

`we-know-about-the-university-of-austin-the-self-proclaimed-anti-censorship-
`
`institution/?sh=44d816ec51a8)
`
` Politico (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/11/13/college-
`
`university-higher-education-521182 and
`
`https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/11/17/university-austin-bari-
`
`weiss-pinker-culture-politics-522800);
`
` The Boston Globe (https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/07/25/opinion/welcome-
`
`alternative-lack-academic-freedom-college-campuses/);
`
` The Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/14/inside-university-
`
`dangerous-ideas/);
`
` The Manhattan Institute (https://www.manhattan-institute.org/uatx-and-truth-
`
`pursuit-higher-education and https://www.city-journal.org/summary-of-uatx-
`
`forbidden-courses-program)
`
` The New Republic (https://newrepublic.com/article/164325/university-of-austin-
`
`anti-woke);
`
`
`
`
`
`Inside Higher Ed (https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/what-
`
`university-austin-gets-right)
`
`International Policy Digest (https://intpolicydigest.org/project-uatx-new-
`
`universities-old-problems/);
`
` MSNBC (https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/university-austin-best-cancel-culture-
`
`grift-yet-n1283845)
`
` The College Fix (https://www.thecollegefix.com/students-praise-new-forbidden-
`
`courses-university-program-featuring-canceled-professors-lots-of-debate/);
`
`10
`
`

`

` The Spectator (https://spectatorworld.com/topic/how-to-start-a-university-
`
`austin/);
`
` The Federalist (https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/12/dont-reform-higher-
`
`education-rebuild-it/);
`
` The Texas Tribune (https://www.texastribune.org/2021/11/08/university-austin-
`
`founders-college-culture/);
`
` CommonWealth Magazine (https://commonwealthmagazine.org/education/new-
`
`university-aims-to-force-a-reckoning-over-campus-speech/);
`
` The Dallas Morning News
`
`(https://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2021/11/09/university-of-austin-
`
`launched-by-college-critics-in-response-to-a-culture-of-censorship/);
`
` The Nation (https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/university-austin/);
`
` Austin American-Stateman
`
`(https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2021/11/08/university-austin-launches-
`
`without-accreditation-physical-campus/6340353001/); and
`
` The Daily Princetonian
`
`(https://www.dailyprincetonian.com/article/2021/11/cancel-culture-university-of-
`
`austin-opinion-princeton-katz-weiss).
`
`20.
`
`Opposer has been featured on numerous podcasts, talk shows, and news broadcast
`
`programs offered on some of the most popular cable television and online platforms and accessed
`
`by millions of Americans across the country, including the following:
`
` CNN (https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2021/11/20/university-of-austin-niall-
`
`ferguson-intv-sot-smerconish-vpx.cnn);
`
`11
`
`

`

` MSNBC (https://www.msnbc.com/the-mehdi-hasan-show/watch/mehdi-hasan-
`
`exposes-hypocrisy-behind-the-right-s-free-speech-focused-university-
`
`126218309643)
`
` Fox News (https://www.foxnews.com/video/6306991694112#sp=show-clips)
`
` The Argument, a podcast by The New York Times
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zaW1wbGVjYXN
`
`0LmNvbS8yeHpVaUh4dw/episode/M2QwYzE1YmEtMDU5Mi00MjA1LTk3Nz
`
`ctZGMxYWU5ZWFlNjcz?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUAAA
`
`AAHQAAAAAQQg);
`
` The Ben Shapiro Show
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zb3VuZGNsb3Vk
`
`LmNvbS91c2Vycy9zb3VuZGNsb3VkOnVzZXJzOjE3NDc3MDM3NC9zb3VuZ
`
`HMucnNz/episode/MjU3NjMwN2MtNDE3NC0xMWVjLTliOGEtYWJlYWI0Y
`
`zNlZmI3?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjw9_Ktwvz6AhUAAAAAHQAAAA
`
`AQAg);
`
` The Glenn Beck Program
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUu
`
`Zm0vQk1EQzM1Njc5MTAzODg/episode/MTExOWU5ODQtYjIwMy0xMWVj
`
`LWFkOTQtZDdiNGY2NTA1NGU1?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z
`
`6AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQTg);
`
` EconTalk
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zaW1wbGVjYXN
`
`0LmNvbS93Z2w0eEVnTA/episode/MGQ0ZDExODItYjczNy00NzE5LWEyMW
`
`12
`
`

`

`EtOWFhZWM3ZGUxYjYy?sa=X&ved=0CAgQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUA
`
`AAAAHQAAAAAQAg)
`
` Joe Lonsdale: American Optimist
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29t
`
`L2FtZXJpY2Fub3B0aW1pc3QvZmVlZC54bWw/episode/QW1lcmljYW5PcHRp
`
`bWlzdC5wb2RiZWFuLmNvbS8wM2UxOGIxNC0wNzI4LTNjYTAtODk3Yy0x
`
`NDAwMDMxZWY0NGY?sa=X&ved=0CAgQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUAA
`
`AAAHQAAAAAQAg);
`
` Honestly with Bari Weiss
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUu
`
`Zm0vUlNWMjM0NzE0Mjg4MQ/episode/NzcxYTk3M2UtZmRiYi0xMWVjLW
`
`JmZDAtZWIxNTY1OGRkODY3?sa=X&ved=0CAgQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6A
`
`hUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg);
`
` DarkHorse Podcast
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5idXp6c3Byb3V0L
`
`mNvbS80MjQwNzUucnNz/episode/QnV6enNwcm91dC05NTQ2OTk4?sa=X&v
`
`ed=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjAiM-b8fz6AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQLA);
`
` Lex Fridman Podcast
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9sZXhmcmlkbWFuLmNvbS9m
`
`ZWVkL3BvZGNhc3Qv/episode/aHR0cHM6Ly9sZXhmcmlkbWFuLmNvbS8_c
`
`D00ODMz?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUAAAAAHQAAAA
`
`AQPA);
`
`13
`
`

`

` Re:verb
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmV2ZXJiY2FzdC5jb20
`
`vP2Zvcm1hdD1yc3M/episode/NWE4Y2Q0YjJiZmYyMDA0MTVjZGZiNjk4Oj
`
`VhOGNlOGE3ZTQ5NjZiOTNlMzkxZTA1ODo2MWIyZDExODFiMWEyOTI4
`
`MzNhOGY0YzQ?sa=X&ved=0CAgQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUAAAAAHQ
`
`AAAAAQIw);
`
` The Soul of Enterprise: Business in the Knowledge Economy
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudm9pY2VhbWVyaWNh
`
`LmNvbS9yc3MvaXR1bmVzLzIzNDc/episode/aHR0cHM6Ly9jaHJ0LmZtL3Ry
`
`YWNrL0M4RjQ4Ny9jZG4udm9pY2VhbWVyaWNhLmNvbS9pbmZsdWVuY2
`
`Vycy8wMTE0NDkvYmFrZXIwODI2MjIubXAz?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKE
`
`wjot7axv_z6AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQKg);
`
` Tangle
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8zZTcwZT
`
`RkMC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw/episode/NDc5ZmYwNjUtYWEzMi00ZmIyLWI5Z
`
`DYtZTUxZDI2ZjNkOTM3?sa=X&ved=0CAIQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhUAA
`
`AAAHQAAAAAQMA); and
`
` Texas Rising
`
`(https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy85ODhiYz
`
`U4NC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw/episode/NDU4MDY0MWQtOTAxOS00ODllLTlm
`
`OWEtMjA4NTM1NjI5MWNk?sa=X&ved=0CAgQuIEEahcKEwjot7axv_z6AhU
`
`AAAAAHQAAAAAQAg).
`
`14
`
`

`

`21.
`
`Opposer’s Founders and Board of Advisors comprise some of the brightest and
`
`most influential thought leaders and educators of our time. Their involvement and association
`
`with Opposer have attracted intense media attention and significant consumer interest in Opposer’s
`
`services.
`
`22.
`
`Opposer has engaged in substantial fundraising efforts and has received donations
`
`from more than 1,600 individuals across the United States. Opposer raised over $100,000,000 in
`
`donations during its first year. Opposer recently announced that it has received a $10 million
`
`pledge from a philanthropist donor, a gift which has garnered nationwide publicity.
`
`23.
`
`Opposer has invested over $360,000 to date to promote the UATX™ mark in
`
`connection with Opposer’s higher education services. Opposer utilizes advertising and publicity
`
`in print media and on social media platforms to reach consumers throughout the United States.
`
`Opposer also employs two full-time employees to handle public relations and promotion of the
`
`UATX™ brand with Opposer’s educational services.
`
`24.
`
`Since at least 2021, Opposer has invested significant time, money, and resources in
`
`marketing, advertising, and promoting its education services offered under the UATXTM mark
`
`through online advertising, press coverage, and other programs. These activities have established
`
`a direct connection between Opposer’s higher education services and the UATXTM mark such that
`
`consumers would, and do, recognize the mark primarily as a source identifier for Opposer’s higher
`
`education services.
`
`25.
`
`Because of Opposer’s widespread, continuous, and substantially exclusive use of
`
`the UATXTM mark for education services, consumers associate UATXTM with Opposer, and
`
`Opposer has acquired substantial goodwill in connection with UATXTM. Thus, Opposer owns
`
`15
`
`

`

`common law rights to the UATXTM mark, and Opposer’s UATXTM mark has acquired
`
`distinctiveness both for the consuming public and in Opposer’s trade.
`
`Applicant Background and the Applied-for Mark
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant, a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of Arizona, with an address at 2625 W. Baseline Road, Tempe, AZ 85283, owns U.S.
`
`Trademark Application Serial No. 97/120,643, filed on November 11, 2021, to register “UATX”
`
`in International Class 41 (the “Applied-for Mark”) for the same types of services that Opposer has
`
`offered to U.S. consumers under its UATXTM mark since at least as early as August 2021 and with
`
`which Opposer has acquired distinctiveness with the UATX™ mark.
`
`27.
`
`According to the Application, Applicant claims it began use of the Applied-for
`
`Mark in commerce in the United States on April 2, 2020.
`
`28.
`
`Applicant maintains a social media presence across a variety of online platforms,
`
`including Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube. However, Applicant does not use the
`
`Applied-for Mark to identify itself on these platforms, instead using account names and handles
`
`such as “UAT,” “UATedu,” and “University of Advancing Technology.” Upon information and
`
`belief, Applicant has not used its social media pages to promote the Applied-for Mark in a manner
`
`sufficient to establish use in commerce for the purposes of Section 1(a) of the Lanham Act, as
`
`amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a).
`
`29.
`
`Opposer’s UATXTM mark has priority over the Applicant’s merely descriptive
`
`Applied-for Mark because, unlike the Applied-for Mark, Opposer’s UATX™ mark has acquired
`
`distinctiveness on the market as primarily a source identifier for Opposer’s higher education
`
`services.
`
`16
`
`

`

`30.
`
`Opposer’s UATX™ mark has priority over the Applied-for Mark because the
`
`Applicant has failed to establish secondary meaning for its merely descriptive mark.
`
`31.
`
`Additionally, Opposer’s UATX™ mark has priority over the Applied-for Mark
`
`because the Applied-for Mark is geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and thus Applicant
`
`cannot establish trademark rights to the Applied-for Mark.
`
`32.
`
`Because Opposer has superior rights in UATXTM over the Applied-for Mark,
`
`Opposer has the right to exclude Applicant from the use and registration of the Applied-for Mark.
`
`33.
`
`Applicant’s Applied-for Mark is confusingly similar to Opposer’s UATXTM mark
`
`because the marks are identical in appearance, sound, and connotation and used, as claimed by
`
`Applicant, in connection with identical services. Opposer disputes Applicant’s claim of use of the
`
`Applied-for Mark in connection with all of the services Applicant claims in the Application.
`
`34.
`
`Applicant’s identified services are “[e]ducation services in the nature of courses at
`
`the university level; [e]ducational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the
`
`undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate level and distribution of course materials in connection
`
`therewith; [e]ducational services, namely, providing online courses of instruction at the
`
`undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate level and distribution of course materials in connection
`
`therewith; [t]eaching, training, and courses of instruction at the undergraduate, graduate and post-
`
`graduate level; [p]roviding information about education,” which are identical to Opposer’s higher
`
`education services.
`
`35.
`
`The identical services coincide with an overlap in customer bases between the
`
`Opposer and the Applicant. Applicant’s higher education services are clearly targeted at
`
`consumers who are interested in post-secondary education, which comprise Opposer’s customer
`
`base.
`
`17
`
`

`

`36.
`
`In the eyes of the consuming public, the UATXTM mark primarily is associated with
`
`the Opposer’s higher education services. Thus, the use of the identical Applied-for Mark by
`
`Applicant for identical services that are offered through identical channels is likely to result in
`
`consumer confusion as to the source of the Opposer’s UATXTM services, a mistaken assumption
`
`that the Opposer is affiliated with the Applicant, or a mistaken assumption that Opposer endorses
`
`the educational services offered by the Applicant.
`
`37.
`
`Furthermore, Opposer’s UATX™ mark has priority over the Applied-for Mark
`
`because the Applicant has identified services in the Application for which the Applicant has not
`
`used the Applied-for Mark in commerce and thus has not established trademark rights.
`
`38.
`
`Registration of Applicant’s Applied-for Mark represents a real threat to the
`
`goodwill and acquired distinctiveness that Opposer has established in the UATXTM mark through
`
`substantial and continuous use, advertising expenditures, sales, and publicity.
`
`39.
`
`Because the Applied-for Mark is highly likely to cause consumer confusion with
`
`Opposer’s UATXTM mark, Opposer will be damaged by registration of the Applied-for Mark.
`
`GROUNDS FOR OPPOSITION
`
`Merely Descriptive (15 U.S.C. § 1052(e))
`
`40.
`
`Opposer repeats and realleges each allegation set forth above.
`
`41.
`
`Applicant’s Applied-for Mark is not eligible for registration on the Principal
`
`Register as it is merely descriptive and has not gained the requisite acquired distinctiveness in the
`
`market for the identified services.
`
`42.
`
`Abbreviations are standard practice in the higher education industry to identify the
`
`institution that is the source of the education services. Because many of the institutions are located
`
`18
`
`

`

`in cities, states, and regions, or have names that contain similar initial letters, consumers are
`
`accustomed to encountering identical abbreviations for different educational institutions.
`
`43.
`
`These acronyms utilized within the higher education services industry are not
`
`inherently distinctive, as they are primarily interpreted by the consuming public as merely
`
`describing the type of institution that is providing the education services and that the institution is
`
`located in a geographic location or has a name with those particular starting letters. For example,
`
`the acronym “UA” could refer to the University of Alabama, University of Alaska, University of
`
`Akron, University of Arkansas, or University of Arizona, among others.
`
`44.
`
`Because these acronyms are not inherently distinctive in connection with higher
`
`education services, to obtain registration on the Principal Register, a rights owner must either
`
`incorporate additional distinctive elements (e.g., a logo, emblem, or mascot) or demonstrate that
`
`the acronym has gained secondary meaning and primarily functions as a source identifier for its
`
`particular services in the market.
`
`45.
`
`Applicant has failed to make any showing that the Applied-for Mark has gained
`
`secondary meaning in the market for education services.
`
`46.
`
`Instead, the acronym “UATX” primarily operates as a source identifier for the
`
`Opposer’s services. Although Opposer’s first use of the “UATX” mark in commerce occurred
`
`approximately one year after Applicant’s claimed date of first use in commerce, the consuming
`
`public has come to associate the “UATX” mark primarily as a source identifier for the Opposer,
`
`and not the Applicant.
`
`47.
`
`Opposer’s acquired distinctiveness for the UATX™ mark is evidenced by
`
`overwhelming press coverage, Opposer’s significant social media presence, and Opposer’s
`
`19
`
`

`

`widespread marketing campaign that promote and publicize the Opposer and its higher education
`
`services. See infra ¶¶ 3–23.
`
`48.
`
`A Google search for “UATX,” conducted on October 25, 2022, identified Opposer
`
`as the primary reference associated with the “UATX” acronym. The top three search results all
`
`are associated with or discuss the Opposer and its education services. Furthermore, Google
`
`highlights the Opposer in a Google+ box and provides additional information, including Opposer’s
`
`contact information and links to Opposer’s official website and social media pages. A screenshot
`
`of this Google search is provided:
`
`49.
`
`Of the top 50 search results on Google, 72% refer to the Opposer, while only a
`
`single search result is associated with the Applicant. Of the top 100 search results on Google, 60%
`
`refer to the Opposer, as opposed to 1% for the Applicant. See Exhibit B for the first eleven pages
`
`of results from the Google search conducted on October 25, 2022.
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`50.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant’s Applied-for Mark has not been
`
`mentioned in any major news or trade publications and has garnered at most de minimis consumer
`
`recognition in the higher education industry.
`
`51.
`
`Applicant has not demonstrated that the Applied-for Mark functions primarily as a
`
`source identifier for its education services, and Applicant cannot establish having acquired
`
`distinctiveness for the Applied-for Mark in light of the consuming public’s overwhelming
`
`association of the UATX™ mark with Opposer’s higher education services.
`
`52.
`
`Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1052(e)(1), the Applied-for Mark is not eligible for registration on the Primary Register.
`
`Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive (15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(3))
`
`53.
`
`Opposer repeats and realleges each allegation set forth above.
`
`54.
`
`Geographic location is an important factor for consumers when considering and
`
`making purchasing decisions regarding higher education due to a variety of reasons, including
`
`availability of financial aid, access to amenities, weather conditions, terrain, proximity to family
`
`and friends, and state and regional loyalty.
`
`55.
`
`Consumers are accustomed to encountering abbreviations and acronyms in the
`
`market for post-secondary education and use these abbreviations as a source of information
`
`regarding the geographic location of a learning institution.
`
`56.
`
`Consumers primarily understand the “U” in an abbreviation for a higher education
`
`institution to stand for the word “University” and the letters that follow to describe the
`
`geographic location of said educational institution.
`
`57.
`
`Consumers are likely to view the “UATX” mark when used in connection with
`
`post-secondary education services as geographically descriptive of the associated services.
`
`21
`
`

`

`58. When viewing the Applied-for Mark on the market and in connection with
`
`education services, consumers will primarily interpret the letter “U” to mean “University” and
`
`the letters “ATX” to refer to the city of Austin, Texas or the letters “TX” as the standard two-
`
`letter postal abbreviation for the state of Texas.
`
`59.
`
`Applicant is a private, for-profit university-level educational institution located
`
`and offering services in the state of Arizona and organized under the laws of Arizona.
`
`60.
`
`Based on the primarily geographic meaning of the Applied-for Mark and the
`
`actual geographic location of Applicant’s services, consumers will incorrectly believe that the
`
`Applied-for Mark is used by a university located in Austin, Texas or more broadly within the
`
`state of Texas.
`
`61.
`
`Applicant’s use of its “UATX” mark is geographically deceptively misdescriptive
`
`as it misleads consumers into believing that the Applicant’s campus, facilities, or services
`
`originate from or are located in, accredited by, or associated with the city of Austin or the state of
`
`Texas when in fact they are not.
`
`62.
`
`Applicant’s geographic misrepresentation is likely to be a material factor in a
`
`purchaser’s decision in selecting higher education services.
`
`63.
`
`Because the Applied-for Mark is geographically deceptively misdescriptive in
`
`connection with the Applicant’s identified services, the Applied-for Mark is not eligible for
`
`registration, regardless of whether or not the Applied-for Mark has acquired distinctiveness on the
`
`market.
`
`64.
`
`Accordingly, pursuant to Section 2(e)(3) of the Lanham Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1052(e)(3), Applicant’s Applied-for Mark is not entitled to registration.
`
`Likelihood of Confusion (15 U.S.C. § 1052(d))
`
`22
`
`

`

`65.
`
`Opposer repeats and realleges each allegation set forth above.
`
`66.
`
`Opposer has priority in the UATXTM mark based upon the acquired distinctiveness
`
`that the UATXTM mark has gained in commerce as primarily a source identifier for Opposer’s
`
`education services. Opposer’s use has generated significant goodwill in its UATXTM mark in
`
`connection with its education services such that consumers recognize the mark primarily

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket