`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1165065
`
`Filing date:
`
`10/11/2021
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91271369
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`Silver Apple, Inc.
`
`ROGER D. EMERSON
`EMERSON THOMSON BENNETT LLC
`1914 AKRON PENINSULA ROAD
`AKRON, OH 44313
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: iplaw@etblaw.com
`330-434-9999
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Woli I. Urbe
`
`iplaw@etblaw.com
`
`/Woli I. Urbe/
`
`10/11/2021
`
`Attachments
`
`Silver_Apple_Answer_91271369.pdf(1421356 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`SILVER APPLE, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`In the matter of Trademark Application
`Serial No.: 90/056,916
`
`Opposition No.: 91271369
`
`Mark: SILVERAPPLE
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Applicant Silver Apple, Inc. (“Silver Apple”), by and through its undersigned counsel,
`
`responds to Apple Inc.’s (“Opposer”) Notice of Opposition (the “Opposition”). To the extent not
`
`specifically admitted, Silver Apple denies every allegation in the Opposition. Silver Apple
`
`incorporates the heading used by Opposer in the Opposition for convenience and ease of reference,
`
`and denies any allegations, assertions or inferences associated with the same.
`
`FACTS
`
`1.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`2.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`3.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Opposition.
`
`4. Whether Opposer’s Marks are famous is a conclusion of law to which no answer is
`
`required. Silver Apple denies the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 4 of the Opposition.
`
`1
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 1 appears to be a copy of printouts of Forbes
`
`magazine articles. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 5 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`6.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 2 appears to be a printout of a Harris Interactive
`
`report. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 6 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`7.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 3 appears to be a copy of printouts of Interbrand’s
`
`“Best Global Brands” rankings. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 7 of the Opposition and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`8.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 4 appears to be a copy of printouts of Millward
`
`Brown Optimor’s brand rankings. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 8 of the Opposition and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`9.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 5 appears to be a copy of printouts of Millward
`
`Brown Optimor’s brand rankings. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 9 of the Opposition and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`10.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 6 appears to be a copy of printouts of OnePoll’s
`
`rankings. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 10 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`2
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 7 appears to be copies of printouts from Fortune
`
`Magazine. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 11 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`12.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 8 appears to be a copy of printouts from Brand
`
`Finance report. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 12 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`13.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 13 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`14.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 9 appears to be a copy of website printouts. Silver
`
`Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations
`
`set forth in Paragraph 14 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`15.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 10 appears to be a copy of website printouts.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 15 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`16.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 16 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`17.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 17 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`18.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 11 appears to be a copy of website printouts.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 18 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`3
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 12 appears to be a copy of website printouts.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 19 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`20.
`
`Silver Apple admits that the electronic records maintained by the Trademark Status
`
`& Document Retrieval (TSDR) lists Apple Inc. (a California Corporation) as the owner of U.S.
`
`Registration Nos. 4,088,195; 3,298,028; 2,808,567; 5,341,294; 3,710,912; 6,110,765; 6,110,768;
`
`3,679,056; 3,928,818; 6,147,070; 4,009,791; 3,717,431; 5,443,302; 5,448,031; 2,926,853; and
`
`2,753,069. Silver Apple admits that Exhibit 13 appears to be a copy of non-certified copies of
`
`Certificates of Registration. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 20 of the Opposition, and therefore
`
`denies same.
`
`21. Whether Opposer’s Marks are valid, subsisting, and incontestable is a conclusion
`
`of law to which no answer is required. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 21 of the Opposition and
`
`therefore denies same.
`
`22.
`
`Silver Apple admits filing U.S. Trademark Application No. 90/056,916 for the
`
`mark SILVERAPPLE on July 16, 2020. The Application was filed on an intent-to-use bases for
`
`services listed in International Classes 35, 41, and 42. Silver Apple is without information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 22 of
`
`the Opposition, and therefore denies same.
`
`23.
`
`Silver Apple denies the legal sufficiently of Opposer’s claims but admits that the
`
`Opposition attempts to state grounds under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d)
`
`4
`
`
`
`and Section 43(c)(1) of the Lanham Act, 5 § U.S.C. 1125(c). Silver Apple denies the remaining
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 23 of the Opposition.
`
`
`
`FIRST GROUND FOR OPPOSITION
`LIKELY TO CAUSE CONFUSION, OR TO CAUSE MISTAKE, OR TO DECEIVE
`
`24.
`
`Silver Apple denies the legal sufficiency of Opposer’s claims and allegations.
`
`Silver Apple repeats and reiterates its responses to the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-23
`
`above.
`
`25.
`
`Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations set forth in Paragraph 25 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`Opposition.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 26 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 27 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 28 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 29 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 30 of the
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 31 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 32 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 33 of the Opposition.
`
`SECOND GROUND FOR OPPOSITION
`DILUTION OF A FAMOUS MARK
`
`34.
`
`Silver Apple denies the legal sufficiency of Opposer’s claims and allegations.
`
`Silver Apple repeats and reiterates its responses to the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-33
`
`above.
`
`5
`
`
`
`35. Whether Opposer’s Marks are famous is a conclusion of law to which no answer is
`
`required. Silver Apple is without information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations set forth in Paragraph 35 of the Opposition and therefore denies same.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 36 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 37 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 38 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies the allegations set forth in Paragraph 39 of the Opposition.
`
`Silver Apple denies that Opposer is entitled to any relief whatsoever, including the
`
`relief requested by Opposer in its prayer for relief.
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`41.
`
`There is no likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception because, inter alia, Silver
`
`Apple’s mark and the alleged trademarks of Opposer are not confusingly similar.
`
`SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`42. Relevant consumers will not confuse or conclude that Silver Apple’s services and
`
`Opposer’s goods and services share a common source, affiliation, or connection.
`
`THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`43.
`
`The channels of trade for Silver Apple’s services as identified in the Application
`
`are sufficiently distinct and different from the relevant channels of trade for the goods and services
`
`alleged to be offered by the alleged trademarks of Opposer so as to avoid confusion, deception, or
`
`mistake as to the source, sponsorship, association or approval of Silver Apples’s services.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`44. Opposer will not be damaged in any legally cognizable or actionable way by
`
`registration of the mark to Silver Apple.
`
`FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`45.
`
`The scope of protection of Opposer’s marks are limited by the existence of similar
`
`third-party marks for educational services. Attached as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of
`
`the registration certificates of co-existing third-party registrations.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Silver Apple respectfully requests that:
`
`1. the Notice of Opposition be dismissed with prejudice;
`
`2. a registration for the trademark SILVERAPPLE be issued to Silver Apple; and
`
`3. the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board award such other and further relief as it deems
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`just and proper.
`
`
`Dated: October 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Woli I. Urbe
`Woli I. Urbe
`Emerson Thomson Bennett, LLC
`1914 Akron-Peninsula Rd.
`Akron, Ohio 44313
`(330) 434-9999 – Telephone
`(330) 434-8888 – Facsimile
`wiu@etblaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Applicant Silver Apple, Inc.
`
`7
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`was filed electronically with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board via Electronic System for
`
`Trademark Trials and Appeals and duly served upon counsel for Opposer via e-mail on October
`
`11, 2021.
`
`
`
`William M. Bryner
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1001 West Fourth Street
`Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101
`Telephone: (336) 607-7482
`Facsimile: (336) 734-2656
`Email: bbryner@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Hannah T. Yang
`1080 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, California 94025
`Telephone: (650) 326-2400
`Facsimile: (650) 326-2422
`Email: HYang@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Woli I. Urbe
`Woli I. Urbe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 5,887,036
`
`Registered Oct. 15, 2019
`
`Red Apple Solutions, LLC (UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)
`1389 Center Drive, Ste 200
`Park City, UTAH 84098
`
`Int. Cl.: 36
`
`Service Mark
`
`Principal Register
`
`CLASS 36: Insurance brokerage in the field of education
`
`FIRST USE 1-11-2019; IN COMMERCE 4-1-2019
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY
`PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR
`
`SER. NO. 88-260,855, FILED 01-14-2019
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 5,924,141
`
`Registered Dec. 03, 2019
`
`Apple Montessori Schools, LLC (DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)
`5 Newark Pompton Turnpike
`Riverdale, NEW JERSEY 07457
`
`Int. Cl.: 41
`
`Service Mark
`
`Principal Register
`
`CLASS 41: Education services, namely, providing classroom instruction at the infant, toddler,
`pre-school, kindergarten and elementary school
`levels using Montessori principles, and
`distribution of course material in connection therewith; day camp, summer camp, before and
`after school education programs featuring recreation and activities for children at the infant,
`toddler, pre-school, kindergarten and elementary school levels
`
`FIRST USE 10-1-1972; IN COMMERCE 10-1-1999
`
`The mark consists of an apple with a stem and leaf on top and a slice of apple cut out so that
`one can see the apple seeds inside, along with the words "APPLE MONTESSORI
`SCHOOLS" to the side of the picture.
`
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the following apart from the mark as shown:
`"MONTESSORI SCHOOLS"
`
`SER. NO. 88-150,854, FILED 10-11-2018
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 5,227,866
`
`Registered Jun. 20, 2017
`
`Yelena Dobrynina (UNITED STATES INDIVIDUAL)
`Unit 102
`9152 Lemona Ave.
`North Hiils, CA 91343
`
`Int. Cl.: 41
`
`Service Mark
`
`CLASS 41: Education services in the nature of early childhood instruction
`
`FIRST USE 4-9-2014; IN COMMERCE 4-9-2014
`
`Principal Register
`
`The color(s) white, red, and black is/are claimed as a feature of the mark.
`
`The mark consists of a an apple, cut in half, with red skin, black lining inside the red, and a
`red border along the black, with a slice of apple with red skin, white fill, and black lining in
`front of it with the stem and leaf of the apple in back. The words "APPLE SCHOOL" appear
`in a red and white stylized font within a white banner with black outline across the middle of
`the apple. The slogan ""GIVE US A SEED, WE WILL GROW AN APPLE"" appears in
`black stylized font
`in an arc above the apple and the words "EARLY CHILDHOOD
`EDUCATIONAL CENTER" in black stylized font in an arc below. The mark appears on a
`white background.
`
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the following apart from the mark as shown:
`"SCHOOL" AND "EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER"
`
`SER. NO. 87-239,593, FILED 11-16-2016
`MEGA MAJCHER HARTNETT, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 6,493,551
`
`Registered Sep. 21, 2021
`
`Chad Napier Inc. (CALIFORNIA CORPORATION)
`3415 S Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 1100
`Los Angeles, CALIFORNIA 90034
`
`Int. Cl.: 9, 16, 41
`
`Service Mark
`
`Trademark
`
`Principal Register
`
`CLASS 9: Downloadable e-books in the field of children's books featuring a golden
`doodle dog named "Apple"
`
`FIRST USE 11-15-2017; IN COMMERCE 11-15-2017
`
`CLASS 16: A Series of children's books about a Goldendoodle dog named "Apple"
`
`FIRST USE 11-15-2017; IN COMMERCE 11-15-2017
`
`CLASS 41: Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing webisodes about a
`Goldendoodle dog named "Apple" featuring children's entertainment and education via
`a global computer network
`
`FIRST USE 11-15-2017; IN COMMERCE 11-15-2017
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO
`ANY PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR
`
`SER. NO. 87-665,168, FILED 10-30-2017
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 5,472,885
`
`Registered May 22, 2018
`
`Int. Cl.: 29, 30, 32, 41, 43
`
`Service Mark
`
`Trademark
`
`Principal Register
`
`LE CHATEAU DE MA MERE SA (BELGIUM CORPORATION)
`Avenue Prekelinden 38
`Brussels, BELGIUM 1020
`
`CLASS 29: Chocolate milk; Compotes; Dairy-based beverages; Edible oils and fats; Eggs;
`Jellies, jams; Meat extracts; Milk; Milk curd; Milk powder; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit
`and vegetables; Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live
`
`CLASS 30: Baking powder; Cocoa; Confectionery, namely, pastilles; Edible ices; Flour;
`Frozen yoghurt; Honey; Ice cream; Ice milk; Ice for refreshment; Mustard; Preparations made
`from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, cereal based energy bars and breakfast
`cereals; Rice; Sago; Salt; Sauces; Spices; Sugar; Tapioca; Vinegar; Yeast; Table syrup
`
`CLASS 32: Beers; Energy drinks; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Isotonic beverages; Mineral
`and aerated waters; Non-alcoholic cocktails; Preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit
`drinks, energy drinks,
`isotonic beverages, soft drinks, and non-alcoholic cocktails; Soft
`drinks; Sports drinks; Syrups for beverages
`
`CLASS 41: Educational services, namely, providing workshops, classes, and seminars in the
`fields of hospitality, health, and nutritional matters; Organizing community sporting and
`cultural events; Training services in the field of hospitality, health and nutritional matters;
`Education
`and entertainment
`services, namely, ongoing television public
`service
`announcements and ongoing television programs in the field of hospitality, health and
`nutritional matters broadcast over television, satellite, audio and video media
`
`CLASS 43: Hotel services; Providing of food and drink; Restaurant services
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO ANY
`PARTICULAR FONT STYLE, SIZE OR COLOR
`
`OWNER OF BENELUX REG. NO. 0833883, DATED 11-27-2007, RENEWED AS REG.
`NO. 0833883, DATED 11-27-2017, EXPIRES 11-27-2027
`
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use the following apart from the mark as shown:
`"APPLE"
`
`SER. NO. 87-391,683, FILED 03-30-2017
`
`
`
`ited States of Amery,
`ley
`
`Antted States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`POISON APPLE EDUCATION
`PROJECT
`
`Reg. No. 4,960,931
`Registered May 17, 2016
`
`POISON APPLE EDUCATION PROJECT (CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION)
`11684 VENTURA BLVD
`#254
`STUDIO CITY, CA 91604
`
`Int. CL: 36
`
`SERVICE MARK
`
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`FOR: CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING; CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING SERVICES; CHARTT-
`ABLE FUNDRAISING SERVICES FOR PROMOTING RESEARCH, EDUCAT[TION AND
`
`OTHER ACTIVITIES RELATING TO THE USE OF PESTICIDES AND ANTIBIOTICS;
`CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING SERVICES, BY MEANS OF PROVIDING INDIVIDUALS
`WITH THE INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE MONETARY DONATIONS
`TO THEIR FAVORITE CHARITY, CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING SERVICES FOR PROMOT-
`ING RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND OTHER ACTIVITIES RELATING TO AUTISM AND
`HARMFUL FOOD PRACTICES, IN CLASS 36 (U.S. CLS. 100, 101 AND 102).
`
`FIRST USE 1-22-2016; INCOMMERCE1-22-2016.
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIM TO
`TICULARTONT, STYLE, SIZE, OR COLOR.
`
`ANY PAR-
`
`NO CILATM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "EDUCATION PROJECT" IN
`INT. CLASS 36,APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`
`
`SN 86-373,244, FILED 8-21-2014.
`
`KARENK. BUSIL EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`
`
`Wtrettt, K Lo
`Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`ited States of Amery,
`Antted States Patent and Trademark Office
`lly
`
`THE GOLDEN APPLE RULE
`
`Reg. No. 4,680,698
`Registered Feb. 3, 2015
`
`JCB CONSULTING SERVICES INCORPORATLD (NEW YORK CORPORATION)
`230 STEWART AVENUE
`GARDENCITY, NY 11530
`
`FOR: EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TRAINING TO BUSINESSES,
`SCHOOLS AND INDIVIDUALS IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-BULLYING POLICIES FOR
`CHILDREN WITH FOODALLERGIES AND DIETARY INTOLERANCESAND DISTRIBUTING
`TRAINING MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THLREWITH. EDUCATION SERVICES,
`NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES AND SEMINARSIN THE FIELD OF ANTI-BULLYING
`POLICTES FOR CHILDREN WITH FOOD ALLERGIES AND DIETARY INTOLERANCES
`AND DISTRIBUTING TRAINING MATERIALSIN CONNECTION THEREWITH,IN CLASS
`41 (US. CLS. 100, 101 AND 107).
`
`
`
`
`
`FIRST USE 4-0-2012; IN COMMERCE4-0-2012.
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUTCLAIM‘TO ANY PAR-
`TICULAR FONT, STYLE, SIZE, OR COLOR.
`
`SER. NO. 86-141,729, FILED 12-12-2013.
`
`EDWARD FENNESSY, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`Int. CL: 41
`
`SERVICE MARK
`
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`Vitctth, Ko Lo
`Deputy Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`ited States of Amey
`Antted States Patent and Trademark Office
`lly
`
`wv
`
` BIG APPLE
`ZA7 TUTORING
`
`LLC
`
`Reg. No. 4,636,062
`Registered Nov. 11, 2014
`
`BIG APPLE TUTORING LLC (NEW YORKLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)
`
`259 WEST 18TH STREET, #4
`NEWYORK, NY 10011
`
`FOR: CONDUCTING AFTER SCHOOL MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE, FOREIGN LANGUAGES
`AND STANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION IN GRADES K-12 AND COLLEGE LEVEL
`
`
`TUTORING PROGRAMS; EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TUTORINGIN
`
`
`
`
`TUE FIELDS OF MATIT, ENGLISIT, SCIENCE, rORLIGN LANGUAGES,TISTORY, SOCIAL
`
`SCIENCES AND STANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION FOR GRADESK-12 AND COLLEGE
`LEVEL, IN CLASS 41 (U.S. CLS. 100, 101 AND 107).
`
`
`
`
`FIRST USE 1 1-0-2001; INCOMMERCE1 1-0-2001.
`
`
` ~a USAN RICITARDS, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`
`
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "TUTORING LLC", APART
`FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN.
`
`
`
` 1 THE MARK CONSISTS OF THE DESIGN OF AN APPLE DEPICTED OVER A STYLIZED
`
`
`
`
`DESIGN OF AN OPEN BOOK WITIT THE WORDING "BIG APPLE TUTORING LLC" AP-
`PEARING TO THE RIGHT OF THE APPLE AND OPEN BOOK DESIGNS.
`
`
`SEC. 2(F) AS TO "BIG APPLE TUTORING LLC".
`
`uwSER. NO. 86-190,885, FILED 2-11-2014.
`
`Int. CL: 41
`
`SERVICE MARK
`
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`Wtcbetlh, K Lo
`Deputy Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`ited States of Amery,
`Antted States Patent and Trademark Office
`lly
`
`BIG APPLE TUTORING
`
`BIG APPLE TUTORING LLC (NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)
`259 WEST 18TH STREET,#4
`NEWYORK, NY 10011
`
`
`
`FOR: CONDUCTING AFTER SCHOOL MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE, FOREIGN LANGUAGES,
`AND S'TANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION IN GRADES K-12 AND COLLEGE LEVEL
`TUTORING PROGRAMS; EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TUTORING IN
`THLE FIELDS OF MATT, ENGLISH, SCIENCE, FORLIGN LANGUAGES, INSTORY, SOCIAL
`SCIENCES, AND STANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION FOR GRADESK-12 AND COLLEGE
`LEVEL, IN CLASS 41 (U.S. CLS. 100, 101 AND 107).
`
`FIRST USE 8-1-1998; IN COMMERCE8-1-1998.
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUT CLAIMTO ANY PAR-
`TICULAR FONT, STYLE, SIZE, OR COLOR.
`
`NO CLAIMIS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "TUTORING", APART FROM
`TIL MARK AS SIIOWN.
`
`SEC. 2(F).
`
`SER. NO. 86- 190,867, FILED 2-11-2014.
`
`SUSAN RICHARDS, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`Reg. No. 4,631,421
`Registered Nov. 4, 2014
`
`Int. Cl.: 41
`
`SERVICE MARK
`
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`Vitctth, Ko Lo
`Deputy Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`
`
`Reg. No. 5,612,093
`
`Registered Nov. 20, 2018
`
`Amended Sep. 24, 2019
`
`GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING
` (ILLINOIS CORPORATION), DBA GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION
`8 South Michigan Avenue
`Ste 700
`Chicago, ILLINOIS 60603
`
`Int. Cl.: 41
`
`Service Mark
`
`CLASS 41: Education services, namely, providing mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars and
`workshops in the field of teacher preparation and excellence in teaching
`
`FIRST USE 6-26-2017; IN COMMERCE 6-26-2017
`
`Principal Register
`
`The mark consists of hands shaped to form an apple, with the term "GOLDEN APPLE "
`underneath.
`
`SER. NO. 86-361,405, FILED 08-08-2014
`
`
`
`ited States of Amery,
`Antted States Patent and Trademark Office
`lly
`
`AppleSeed
`
`Reg. No. 4,786,133
`Registered Aug. 4, 2015
`
`AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL (ILLINOIS NON-PROFIT CORPORATION)
`ONE EAST BODE ROAD
`STREAMWOOD, IT, 60107
`
`FOR: DIGITAL MATERIALS, NAMELY, PRERECORDED CDS, DVDS, AND DOWNLOAD-
`ABLb AUDIO AND VIDEO FILES FEATURING RELIGIOUS CONTEN'L, IN CLASS 9 (U.S.
`CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 AND 38).
`
`FIRST USE 7-20-2013; IN COMMERCE7-20-2013.
`
`FOR: PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION,IN
`CLASS 16 (U‘S. CLS. 2, 5, 22, 23, 29, 37, 38 AND 50).
`
`FIRST USE 7-20-2013; IN COMMERCE7-20-2013.
`
`THE MARK CONSISTS OF STANDARD CHARACTERS WITHOUTCLAIM‘TO ANY PAR-
`TICULAR FONT, STYLE, SIZE, OR COLOR.
`
`SN 85-602,672, FILED 4-19-2012.
`
`DOMINIC FATHY, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`Int. Cls.: 9 and 16
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`
`
`Wtrettt, K Lo
`Director of the United States
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site