throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1129090
`04/23/2021
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB INC
`
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`04/24/2021
`
`1158 26TH STREET
`783
`SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
`UNITED STATES
`
`ATYRIA S CLARK
`THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB INC
`1158 26TH STREET
`783
`SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: DIVALAWYERS@GMAIL.COM
`Secondary Email(s): ATYRIASCLARK@GMAIL.COM
`3104157112
`
`Docket Number
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No.
`
`87939686
`
`Publication date
`
`02/23/2021
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`04/23/2021
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`04/24/2021
`
`Baker, Lonita K
`11505 GARDEN COVE CT
`LOUISVILLE, KY 40291
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 045. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Providing legal information, namely, legal
`information about civil rights, personal injury, business law, and criminal law proffered to clients hired
`by an individual attorney and not pertaining to membership of any social club organization
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`No bona fide intent to use mark in commerce for
`identified goods or services
`
`Trademark Act Section 1(b), 44(e) or 66(a)
`
`

`

`False suggestion of a connection with persons,
`living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national
`symbols, or brings them into contempt, or disrep-
`ute
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(a)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Registration
`No.
`
`5769971
`
`Registration Date
`
`06/04/2019
`
`Word Mark
`
`Design Mark
`
`DIVA LAWYERS
`
`Application Date
`
`09/04/2015
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 200. First use: First Use: 2014/01/13 First Use In Commerce: 2018/05/01
`Indicating membership in a social club organization of female attorneys
`
`Attachments
`
`86748634#TMSN.png( bytes )
`Adobe Statement in Support of Notice of Opposition.pdf(286138 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/Atyria S. Clark/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`ATYRIA S CLARK
`
`04/23/2021
`
`

`

`
`
`Atyria S. Clark (SBN: 226295)
`THE COMMUNITY LAW FIRM
`1158 26th Street, Suite 783
`Santa Monica, CA 90403
`Telephone: (310) 415-7112
`Facsimile: (310) 496-1284
`Email: communitylawfirm@gmail.com
`
`
`Attorney for Opposer
`THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB INC
`
`
`UNITED STATES TRADEMARK TRIALS AND APPEALS
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO TRADEMARK
`REGISTRATION FOR APPLICATION SERIAL NO.: 87939686
`
`
`
`THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB INC submits its statement in
`
`support of its opposition to registration of Serial No.: 8793986 for DIVA
`
`ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER as follows:
`
`1. My name is Atyria S. Clark. I am attorney licensed in the states of
`
`California and Florida to practice law.
`
`2.
`
`I am the attorney of record for the trademark registrant, THE DIVA
`
`LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC.
`
`3.
`
`I am also an officer and director of THE DIVA LAWYERS
`
`SOCIAL CLUB, INC.
`
`4.
`
`On June 4, 2019, THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC.
`
`(“Opposer”) successfully registered our collective membership mark “DIVA
`
`
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO REGISTRATION
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`LAWYERS” to identify members of our social group organization consisting of
`
`certain select female attorneys who have been initiated into our organization.
`
`5.
`
`On May 29, 2018, an attorney Ms. Lonita Baker, filed an application
`
`to have the trademark “DIVA ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER” registered in
`
`connection with “providing legal information, namely, legal information about
`
`civil rights, personal injury, business law, and criminal law proffered to clients
`
`hired by an individual attorney and not pertaining to membership of any social
`
`club organization.”
`
`6.
`
`Opposer objects to the registration of this mark because it will
`
`certainly cause likelihood of confusion with its collective membership mark.
`
`7.
`
`Additionally, the proposed registrant of “DIVA ATTORNEY
`
`LONITA BAKER” has not established a bona fide intent to use the mark in
`
`commerce for identified goods and services.
`
`8. Moreover, the proposed mark indicates a false suggestion of a
`
`connection with the person and institution, THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL
`
`CLUB, INC.
`
`9.
`
`The two words in both marks, “DIVA LAWYERS” and “DIVA
`
`ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER” suggest that Lonita Baker is a member of THE
`
`DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, given that the term “Diva Lawyers” and
`
`“Diva Attorney” mean the exact same thing and are synonyms of one another.
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO REGISTRATION
`
`

`

`
`
`10. If the mark “DIVA ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER” is registered,
`
`this mark will lead to the public confusing this mark with the “DIVA
`
`LAWYERS” mark and cause the public to believe that this attorney, Lonita
`
`Baker, is a member of THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC, when she
`
`is not.
`
`11. THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC is a social club of
`
`certain select female attorneys who must meet certain stringent requirements and
`
`submit to a detailed initiation process before they can become members of the
`
`club.
`
`12. Allowing just any female attorney to associate themselves to the club
`
`by registering an extremely similar mark would seriously dilute the strength of
`
`the Opposer’s collective membership mark and cause the public confusion about
`
`who is a member of THE DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC and who is
`
`not.
`
`13. The terms “lawyer” and “attorney” have the exact same meanings
`
`and are often used interchangeably among legal professionals and lay people
`
`alike.
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO REGISTRATION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`14.
`
`In fact, the actual definition of the term “lawyer” encompasses the
`
`term “attorney.”1
`
`15. Similarly, the actual definition of the term “attorney” encompasses
`
`the term “lawyer.”2
`
`16. Given that these two words are direct synonyms of each other, there
`
`is no way the public would not be confused seeing the term “Diva Lawyers” in a
`
`mark with “Diva Attorney” in a mark.
`
`17. Moreover, because the terms “lawyer” and “attorney” are direct
`
`synonyms of each other and mean the same thing, the mark “DIVA ATTONREY
`
`LONITA BAKER” creates a false suggestion of a connection with THE DIVA
`
`LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC.
`
`18. Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1052(a) bars
`
`registration of marks that falsely suggest a connection with persons (living or
`
`dead), institutions, national symbols or beliefs.
`
`19. Registration of the mark “DIVA ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER”
`
`would falsely suggest that this attorney is connected with other attorneys who are
`
`
`1 “Lawyer: 1. A person who practices or studies law; an attorney or a counselor.”
`Definitions from Oxford Languages.
`2 “Attorney: 1. A person appointed to act for another in business or legal matters.
`2. A lawyer.” Definitions from Oxford Languages.
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO REGISTRATION
`
`

`

`
`
`actual members of the DIVA LAWYERS SOCIAL CLUB, INC and/or connected
`
`with the organization.
`
`20. Although the applicant for the mark “DIVA ATTORNEY LONITA
`
`BAKER” claims that her mark will be used in connection with “providing legal
`
`information, namely, legal information about civil rights, personal injury,
`
`business law, and criminal law proffered to clients hired by an individual attorney
`
`and not pertaining to membership of any social club organization,” she has not
`
`established a bona fide intent to use this mark in commerce for these identified
`
`goods and services.
`
`21. Even if at some point she did offer legal services under the mark
`
`“DIVA ATTORNEY LONITA BAKER,” this would not preclude the public
`
`from confusing that mark with the collective membership mark “DIVA
`
`LAWYERS” since all Diva Lawyers are lawyers and offer legal services in their
`
`capacities as lawyers aka attorneys.
`
`22. For the foregoing reasons, the Opposer respectfully requests the
`
`Trademark Trials and Appeals Board to deny this proposed registration.
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_/Atyria S. Clark/______________
`ATYRIA S. CLARK
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`
`STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO REGISTRATION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket