throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1021747
`12/11/2019
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`Skinny & Co., Inc.
`
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`12/25/2019
`
`4762 W. 74TH ST.
`INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46278
`UNITED STATES
`
`BRADLEY M. STOHRY
`REICHEL STOHRY DEAN LLP
`212 W. 10TH ST. SUITE A-285
`INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202
`UNITED STATES
`brad@rsindy.com, docket@rsindy.com
`3174238820
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`88399015
`
`Publication date
`
`08/27/2019
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`12/11/2019
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`12/25/2019
`
`DLJJ & Associates, LLC
`1801 S La Cienega Blvd. Suite 301
`Los Angeles, CA 90035
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 003. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: BB creams; Blush; CC creams; Cosmetic
`creams for skin care; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic preparations; Cos-
`metic preparations for eyelashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and
`cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Eye liner; Eye gels; Eye make-up; Eye pencils; Eye-
`shadow; Eyebrow pencils; Foundation;Lip balm; Lip glosses; Lip liner; Lip stains; Lipstick; Make-up
`kits comprised of non-medicated cosmetics; Make-up sets; Mascara; Skin care preparations, namely,
`skin peels; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-aging
`moisturizers used as cosmetics; Beauty lotions; Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics;
`Cleansing creams; Eye lotions; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial moisturizers;Non-medicated
`skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners,
`cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin serums; Skin bronzer; Skin lotions; Skin moisturizer
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`

`

`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Registration
`No.
`
`5232984
`
`Registration Date
`
`06/27/2017
`
`Word Mark
`
`Design Mark
`
`SKINNY & CO.
`
`Application Date
`
`09/29/2014
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 003. First use: First Use: 2017/04/12 First Use In Commerce: 2017/04/12
`All-purpose cleaners; bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; coconut oil for cos-
`metic purposes; cosmetic soaps; hair care preparations consisting of organic
`coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; hair shampoos and conditioners; hand
`soaps; lip balm; non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations consisting of or-
`ganic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; non-medicated lip care prepara-
`tions; non-medicated lip protectors; soapsand detergents; soaps for household
`use; soaps for personal use
`
`Attachments
`
`86408898#TMSN.png( bytes )
`Skinny Notice of Opposition against THE SKINNY.pdf(133259 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/bms/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`BRADLEY M. STOHRY
`
`12/11/2019
`
`

`

`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the matter of Trademark App. Ser. Nos. 88/399,015
`For the mark THE SKINNY
`
`
`
`
`
`Skinny & Co, Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DLJJ & Associates, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Opposition No.:______________
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`Skinny & Co, Inc. (“Opposer”) hereby opposes the above-referenced application to register
`
`the mark THE SKINNY filed by DLJJ & Associates, LLC (“Applicant”). The grounds for
`
`opposition are as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Opposer is an Indiana corporation with a place of business at 4762 W. 74th St.,
`
`Indianapolis, IN 46278.
`
`2.
`
`Applicant is a California limited liability company with a place of business at 1801
`
`S La Cienega Blvd., Suite 301, Los Angeles, CA 90035.
`
`OPPOSER AND ITS USE OF THE SKINNY & CO. MARK
`
`3.
`
`Opposer sells a variety of pure coconut oil products, including cosmetic products,
`
`beauty products, bath products, cleansing products, and other related products (collectively, the
`
`“Beauty and Cosmetic Products”).
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Opposer is the owner of substantial trademark rights in the SKINNY & CO. mark.
`
`Opposer owns U.S. Trademark Registration Number 5,232,984 for the SKINNY &
`
`CO. mark, which registration covers “All-purpose cleaners; bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form;
`
`

`

`coconut oil for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic soaps; hair care preparations consisting of organic
`
`coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; hair shampoos and conditioners; hand soaps; lip balm;
`
`non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and
`
`coconut virgin oil; non-medicated lip care preparations; non-medicated lip protectors; soaps and
`
`detergents; soaps for household use; soaps for personal use” in Class 3.
`
`6.
`
`Opposer has been using the SKINNY & CO. mark to promote the Beauty and
`
`Cosmetic Products since 2017. Since that time, Opposer has established extensive and valuable
`
`goodwill in the SKINNY & CO. mark and has spent significant amounts of time and money
`
`establishing this goodwill.
`
`7.
`
`The SKINNY & CO. mark has come to indicate and stand for the high-quality
`
`Beauty and Cosmetic Products offered by Opposer.
`
`8.
`
`As a result of Opposer’s use of the SKINNY & CO. mark, the SKINNY & CO.
`
`mark has become valuable property of Opposer.
`
`APPLICANT AND ITS TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`9.
`
`
`Trademark App. Ser. Nos. 88/399,015 (the “Application”) was filed by Applicant
`
`for the mark THE SKINNY on April 23, 2019.
`
`10.
`
`The Application is an intent-to-use application and covers “BB creams; Blush; CC
`
`creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic nourishing creams; Cosmetic
`
`preparations; Cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin care;
`
`Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics and make-up; Eye liner; Eye gels;
`
`Eye make-up; Eye pencils; Eye-shadow; Eyebrow pencils; Foundation; Lip balm; Lip glosses; Lip
`
`liner; Lip stains; Lipstick; Make-up kits comprised of non-medicated cosmetics; Make-up sets;
`
`Mascara; Skin care preparations, namely, skin peels; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`skin serum; Anti-aging moisturizer; Anti-aging moisturizers used as cosmetics; Beauty lotions;
`
`Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Eye lotions; Face creams for
`
`cosmetic use; Facial moisturizers; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin care
`
`preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin
`
`serums; Skin bronzer; Skin lotions; Skin moisturizer” in Class 3.
`
`GROUNDS FOR AND REJECTING APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Opposer’s actual, continuous, and continuing use of the SKINNY & CO. mark in
`
`commerce began well before Applicant filed its Application and/or began using THE SKINNY as
`
`a mark.
`
`12.
`
`Opposer’s application for the SKINNY & CO. mark that resulted in Reg. No.
`
`5,232,984 predates the Application by numerous years.
`
`13.
`
`Applicant’s use and registration of the mark THE SKINNY for the goods listed in
`
`the Application is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and/or lead to deception as to the origin of
`
`Applicant’s goods in violation of Sections 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§1114 and
`
`1125(a).
`
`14.
`
`The likelihood of confusion is apparent in this instance because the marks SKINNY
`
`& CO. and THE SKINNY are highly similar, and the marks will be used in connection with
`
`identical beauty and cosmetic products.
`
`15.
`
`Applicant’s use and registration of the mark THE SKINNY is likely to result in
`
`confusion and substantial damage and injury to Opposer. Persons familiar with Opposer’s
`
`SKINNY & CO. mark are likely to believe that Applicant’s goods originate with, or are licensed,
`
`sponsored or approved by Opposer. Any such confusion would inevitably result in loss of sales to
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Opposer, and/or damage the goodwill and reputation that Opposer has established in the SKINNY
`
`& CO. mark.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that the Application be rejected.
`
`Dated this 11th day of December, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bradley M. Stohry/
`Bradley M. Stohry
`REICHEL STOHRY DEAN LLP
`212 West 10th Street
`Suite A-285
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
`(317) 423-8820
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Skinny & Co, Inc.
`
`Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket