Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1015884
`11/15/2019
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`Entity
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited
`
`Corporation
`
`Citizenship
`
`United Kingdom
`
`29 High Street
`Poole, Dorset, BH15 1AB
`UNITED KINGDOM
`
`Heather Kliebenstein
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`Suite 2200
`150 South Fifth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`UNITED STATES
`dockmpls@merchantgould.com, hklibenstein@merchantgould.com, ak-
`rueger@merchantgould.com
`6123325300
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`88489110
`
`Publication date
`
`10/22/2019
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`11/15/2019
`
`Williams, Tekoa A
`1922 s palomar dr
`deltona, FL 32738
`UNITED STATES
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`11/21/2019
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 003. First Use: 2019/06/26 First Use In Commerce: 2019/06/26
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: 3-in-1 organic non-medicated soap bars for
`use as soap, shampoo and conditioner; Baby hand soap; Bar soap; Beauty soap;Massage candles
`for cosmetic purposes; Natural soap bars; Non-medicated bath soap; Non-medicated skin creams
`with essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Organic soap bars; Perfumed soap; Skin soap
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`No use of mark in commerce before application
`or amendment to allege use was filed
`
`Trademark Act Sections 1(a) and (c)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Registration
`
`3799570
`
`Application Date
`
`05/12/2005
`
`

`

`No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`06/08/2010
`
`Word Mark
`
`Design Mark
`
`KARMA
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 003. First use: First Use: 1996/05/31 First Use In Commerce: 1996/05/31
`Perfumes; bath preparations, namely, bath salts, bubble bath, bath foams, bath
`oils, shower and bath gel, body scrubs and washes; non-medicated toilet pre-
`parations, namely, [ talcum powder, ] soaps; cosmetic preparations, namely,
`skin creams and moisturizers; shampoos
`
`Attachments
`
`78629048#TMSN.png( bytes )
`2019 11 15 Notice of Opposition - KARMA LAMB.pdf(348944 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/Heather Kliebenstein/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Heather Kliebenstein
`
`11/15/2019
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`16244.0004USTL
`
`
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited,
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`Tekoa Williams,
`
`
`
`
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
` Opposition No. ____________
`
` Serial No.: 88/489,110
`
` Mark: KARMA LAMB
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`Cosmetic Warriors Limited, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of
`
`the United Kingdom, with a mailing address of 29 High Street Poole, Dorset BH15 1AB, United
`
`Kingdom (“Cosmetic Warriors” or “Opposer”), believes that it will be damaged by the registration
`
`of the KARMA LAMB mark shown in Application Serial No. 88/489,110 (the “Application”),
`
`filed June 26, 2019, by Tekoa William, an individual residing in the state of Florida with an address
`
`at 1922 South Palomar Drive, Deltona, Florida 32738 (“Applicant”), and hereby opposes
`
`registration of the mark under the following grounds:
`
`1.
`
`By the Application herein opposed, Applicant is seeking to obtain under the
`
`provisions of the Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, registration on the Principal Register of the
`
`trademark KARMA LAMB for the following goods in Class 3 (“Applicant’s Mark”):
`
`“3-in-1 organic non-medicated soap bars for use as soap, shampoo and conditioner;
`Baby hand soap; Bar soap; Beauty soap; Massage candles for cosmetic purposes;
`Natural soap bars; Non-medicated bath soap; Non-medicated skin creams with
`essential oils for use in aromatherapy; Organic soap bars; Perfumed soap; Skin
`soap.”
`
`
`

`

`2.
`
`Applicant filed its Application on June 26, 2019. The Application published for
`
`opposition on October 22, 2019. This Notice of Opposition is timely filed on or before the deadline
`
`of November 21, 2019.
`
`3.
`
`Opposer is the owner of the following U.S. Trademark Registration (hereinafter
`
`“Opposer’s Registered Mark” or the “KARMA Mark”):
`
`KARMA, U.S. Reg. No. 3,799,570, used in connection with, “Perfumes; bath
`preparations, namely, bath salts, bubble bath, bath foams, bath oils, shower and
`bath gel, body scrubs and washes; non-medicated toilet preparations, namely,
`talcum powder, soaps; cosmetic preparations, namely, skin creams and
`moisturizers; shampoos” in International Class 3.
`
`Said registration was registered on the Principal Register on June 8, 2010 and was
`based on an application (S/N 78629048) filed on May 12, 2005, which is a date
`prior to the date of filing of Respondent’s application and prior to Respondent’s
`claimed priority date. This registration is incontestable.
`
`A printout of the status report for this registration from the USPTO’s Trademark Status and
`
`Document Retrieval (“TSDR”) database is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer’s Registered Mark is valid, subsisting, and incontestable under §15 of the
`
`Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1065), and is therefore conclusive evidence of the validity of the
`
`registered mark, of registration of the mark, of Opposer’s ownership of the mark, and of Opposer’s
`
`exclusive right to use the mark in commerce under §33(b) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1115(b)).
`
`5.
`
`Since at least as early as May 31, 1996, Opposer has continuously used the
`
`KARMA Mark in the United States. Opposer’s KARMA Mark has not been abandoned.
`
`6.
`
`In addition to Opposer’s KARMA registration identified above, Opposer also owns
`
`common law rights in the trademark KARMA in connection with a wide array of goods, including
`
`many that are closely related to those listed in the opposed Application. By way of example,
`
`Opposer sells or has recently sold with intent to sell again non-medicated soap bars, shampoos,
`
`bar soap, beauty soap, and skin soap under its KARMA mark, all of which are listed in the opposed
`
`
`
` 2
`
`

`

`Application. Opposer has also used the KARMA Mark in connection with cosmetics, bath
`
`products, fragrances, and aromatherapy products, among other goods. The first of said sales
`
`occurred long before the June 26, 2019 first use date alleged in the Application.
`
`7.
`
`Opposer and its licensees make, sell, and provide a variety of products and services
`
`through Opposer’s approximately 900 retail locations worldwide. This expressly includes
`
`Opposer’s products sold under the KARMA Mark. Opposer and its licensees operate these shops
`
`under the name and trademark LUSH, and such shops have been in continuous operation since the
`
`mid 1990’s and have operated in the United States continuously since 2002.
`
`8.
`
`Opposer and its licensees also operate various e-commerce websites, including
`
`www.lush.com, www.lushusa.com, and www.uk.lush.com, where products and services bearing
`
`the KARMA Mark are promoted and sold to consumers around the world, including in the United
`
`States. This has been true since long before the June 26, 2019 first use date alleged in the
`
`Application.
`
`9.
`
`Opposer’s KARMA Mark is well known in the United States. Millions of dollars
`
`of KARMA-branded products and services have been sold in the United States. Likewise, millions
`
`of dollars have been spent promoting the KARMA Mark in the United States through a variety of
`
`channels.
`
`10.
`
`Opposer’s KARMA Mark points directly and uniquely to Opposer and has become
`
`well-known with consumers familiar with Opposer’s retail operations. Opposer’s KARMA-
`
`branded products all share certain ingredients and emit the same unique scent known by Opposer’s
`
`customers as “karma.” Opposer’s products sold under the KARMA Mark are routinely among the
`
`highest selling products offered by Opposer. As a result, these products receive consistent and
`
`widespread attention on social media and in the press.
`
`
`
` 3
`
`

`

`11.
`
`Opposer has priority with respect to the KARMA LAMB mark at issue in this
`
`proceeding. Opposer has had priority of use of the KARMA Mark long before the June 26, 2019
`
`first use date alleged in the Application.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant’s Mark is confusingly similar to Opposer’s KARMA Mark. The marks
`
`are highly related as they both feature the same dominant and leading term KARMA. Indeed,
`
`Opposer’s renowned KARMA Mark is reproduced in Applicant’s Mark.
`
`13.
`
`The goods listed in Applicant’s Mark are closely related, if not identical, to the
`
`goods that Cosmetic Warriors has long promoted and sold under its KARMA Mark. For instance,
`
`Cosmetic Warriors’ U.S. Registrations for its KARMA Mark cover non-medicated soap bars,
`
`shampoos, bar soap, beauty soap, and skin soap.
`
`14.
`
`Applicant’s Mark creates a false association with Opposer. The parties’ marks have
`
`an overall similar appearance, sound, meaning, and commercial impression. Consumers will
`
`mistakenly believe that Applicant’s goods are connected with, affiliated with, and/or sponsored by
`
`Opposer when the same is not true.
`
`15.
`
`Due to the confusingly similar nature of Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s Mark and
`
`the closely related nature of the goods provided by the respective parties, consumers and potential
`
`consumers are likely to believe that Applicant’s goods originate from Opposer, resulting in a
`
`likelihood of confusion in the marketplace and damage to Opposer.
`
`16.
`
`The Application contains no restrictions as to the channels of trade used in
`
`promoting and selling the identified goods under Applicant’s Mark. Accordingly, it is presumed
`
`the products promoted and sold under Applicant’s Mark occupy all ordinary and normal channels
`
`of trade for such goods. Upon information and belief, the goods provided by Opposer under its
`
`
`
` 4
`
`

`

`KARMA Mark and the goods provided by Applicant under its mark will be promoted and sold in
`
`overlapping and similar channels of trade to the same consumers or class of consumers.
`
`17.
`
`Because of the highly related and overlapping nature of the goods, the use of
`
`overlapping and similar channels of trade, and the confusingly similar nature of the marks in
`
`overall appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression, use of Applicant’s Mark is likely
`
`to cause confusion, or mistake, that Applicant’s goods are those of Opposer, or are otherwise
`
`endorsed, sponsored, or approved by Opposer causing further damage to Opposer.
`
`18.
`
`In addition to the foregoing, upon information and belief, Applicant has not used in
`
`commerce the KARMA LAMB mark on any of the goods listed in the Application.
`
`19.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant’s assertion that it used the mark on all the
`
`goods listed in the Application since the filing date of June 26, 2019 is false and/or fraudulent.
`
`20.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant’s specimen of use submitted on June 26,
`
`2019 is not an actual image of its mark in use in commerce on the goods listed in the Application,
`
`but rather is a digitally altered image obtained online and prepared specifically for the purpose of
`
`deceiving the Trademark Office.
`
`21.
`
`Applicant’s statement that the KARMA LAMB mark has been used in association
`
`with all of the goods listed in the Application since the filing date of the Application was material
`
`to the Examining Attorney’s decision to publish the Application (filed under § 1(a)) and would
`
`also be material to any subsequent decision to issue a registration certificate.
`
`22.
`
`Applicant’s specimen of use purporting to show the KARMA LAMB mark in use
`
`in commerce was material to the Examining Attorney’s decision to publish the Application (filed
`
`under § 1(a)) and would also be material to any subsequent decision to issue a registration
`
`certificate.
`
`
`
` 5
`
`

`

`23.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant knew that its statement about the KARMA
`
`LAMB mark having been used in association with all of the listed goods since the filing date of
`
`the Application was false, and was made with the intent to deceive the Trademark Office so the
`
`Application would be granted.
`
`24.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant knew that its specimen of use was false,
`
`and was submitted with the intent to deceive the Trademark Office so the Application would be
`
`granted.
`
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant committed fraud on the Trademark Office
`
`when it submitted the specimen and asserted that Applicant had been using the mark on all of the
`
`goods listed in the Application since the June 26, 2019 filing date of the Application.
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, there has been no bona fide use of, and Applicant has
`
`no bona fide intention to use, the KARMA LAMB mark in interstate commerce in association with
`
`any of the goods listed in the Application.
`
`27.
`
`Registration of the mark shown in Application Serial No. 88/489,110 will result in
`
`damage to Opposer, pursuant to the allegations stated above.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer asks that its Notice of Opposition be sustained and that
`
`Application Serial No. 88/489,110 for the mark KARMA LAMB in connection with the goods set
`
`forth therein be refused, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(a) and 1052(d).
`
`Please direct all correspondence to the attention of:
`
`Heather J. Kliebenstein
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`P.O. Box 2910
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
`Tel: 612-336-4616 Fax: 612-332-9081
`
`
`
`
`
` 6
`
`

`

`Opposer also hereby appoints: John A. Clifford, Ian G. McFarland, Danielle Mattessich, Lindsay
`
`M.R. Jones; Gregory C. Golla; Scott W. Johnston; Andrew S. Ehard; Christopher J. Schulte; and
`
`Brent Routman as its attorneys with the full power to represent the Opposer in connection with
`
`this proceeding.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`COSMETIC WARRIORS LIMITED,
`
`By its attorneys,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________
`Heather J. Kliebenstein
`Ian G. McFarland
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`P.O. Box 2910
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
`Tel. 612.336.4616
`Fax 612.332.9081
`
`
`
` 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 15, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF FILING
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`was filed electronically with the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals this 15th day
`of November, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`s/Abigail Krueger
` Abigail Krueger
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 8
`
`

`

`
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Status Search SN 3,799,570
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`BULK DATA: Since May 7 at 12 a.m., the TSDR Application Programming Interface (API) has not included all
`information. Images of trademark registration certificates issued since July 2016 and some office actions are
`absent in the API. Customers who need to retrieve a copy of a registration certificate or an office action should
`download it directly from the TSDR documents tab.INTERMITTENT SYSTEM ISSUES: teas@uspto.gov and
`include your serial number, the document you are looking for, and a screenshot of any error messages you
`have received.
`
`STATUS
`
`DOCUMENTS
`
`MAINTENANCE
`
`Back to Search
`
`Print
`
`Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2019-11-15 09:23:16 EST
`
`Mark: KARMA
`
`US Serial Number: 78629048
`
`Application Filing Date: May 12, 20
`
`US Registration Number: 3799570
`
`Registration Date: Jun. 08, 20
`
`Register: Principal
`
`Mark Type: Trademark
`
`TM5 Common Status
`
`Descriptor:
`
`Status: The registration has been renewed.
`
`Status Date: Oct. 26, 2019
`
`Publication Date: Mar. 23, 2010
`
`Mark Information
`
`Mark Literal Elements: KARMA
`
`LIVE/REGISTRATION/Issued and Active
`
`The trademark application has been registered w
`
`Standard Character Claim: Yes. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or
`
`Mark Drawing Type: 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Goods and Services
`
`Note:
`
`The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services:
`
`(cid:149) Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services;
`
`(cid:149) Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and
`
`(cid:149) Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services.
`
`For: Perfumes; bath preparations, namely, bath salts, bubble bath, bath foams, bath oils, shower and
`
`-medicated toilet preparations, namely, [ talcum powder, ] soaps; cosmetic preparations, namely
`
`shampoos
`
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/
`
`11/15/2019
`
`

`

`Status Search SN 3,799,570
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`International Class(es): 003 - Primary Class
`
`U.S Class(es): 001, 004, 0
`
`Class Status: ACTIVE
`
`Basis: 1(a)
`
`First Use: May 31, 1996
`
`Use in Commerce: May 31, 19
`
`Basis Information (Case Level)
`
`Filed Use: Yes
`
`Filed ITU: No
`
`Filed 44D: No
`
`Filed 44E: No
`
`Filed 66A: No
`
`Filed No Basis: No
`
`Current Owner(s) Information
`
`Owner Name: Cosmetic Warriors Limited
`
`Owner Address: 29 High Street, Poole
`
`Dorset UNITED KINGDOM BH15 1AB
`
`Currently Use: Yes
`
`Currently ITU: No
`
`Currently 44E: No
`
`Currently 66A: No
`
`Currently No Basis: No
`
`Legal Entity Type: CORPORATION
`
`State or Country Where
`
`UNITED K
`
`Organized:
`
`Attorney/Correspondence Information
`
`Attorney of Record
`
`Attorney Name: Heather J. Kliebenstein
`
`Docket Number: 16244.4US
`
`Attorney Primary Email
`
`dockmpls@merchantgould.com
`
`Attorney Email Authorized: Yes
`
`Address:
`
`Correspondent
`
`Correspondent
`
`Heather J. Kliebenstein
`
`Name/Address:
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`
`P.O. Box 2910
`
`MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA UNITED STATES 55402-9944
`
`Phone: 612-332-5300
`
`Fax: 612-332-9
`
`Correspondent e-mail: dockmpls@merchantgould.com
`
`Correspondent e-mail
`
`Yes
`
`Authorized:
`
`Domestic Representative
`
`Domestic Representative
`
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`
`Phone: 612-332-5
`
`Name:
`
`Fax: 612-332-9081
`
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/
`
`11/15/2019
`
`

`

`Status Search SN 3,799,570
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`Prosecution History
`
`Date
`
`Oct. 26, 2019
`
`Description
`
`Proceeding Number
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 -
`
`E-MAILED
`
`Oct. 26, 2019
`
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST
`
`77875
`
`RENEWAL - 10 YRS)
`
`Oct. 26, 2019
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR)
`
`77875
`
`ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED
`
`Sep. 25, 2019
`
`TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-
`
`POST REG RECEIVED
`
`Jul. 17, 2019
`
`POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED -
`
`77875
`
`SEC. 8 & 9
`
`Jul. 16, 2019
`
`CASE ASSIGNED TO POST
`
`77875
`
`Jul. 09, 2019
`
`Jun. 08, 2019
`
`Apr. 20, 2018
`
`Apr. 20, 2018
`
`Feb. 13, 2018
`
`Feb. 13, 2018
`
`Feb. 13, 2018
`
`Mar. 21, 2016
`
`Aug. 24, 2015
`
`REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
`
`TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
`
`COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-
`
`YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
`
`NOTICE OF SUIT
`
`NOTICE OF SUIT
`
`NOTICE OF SUIT
`
`NOTICE OF SUIT
`
`NOTICE OF SUIT
`
`COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999
`
`226016
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15
`
`- E-MAILED
`
`Aug. 24, 2015
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED
`
`68335
`
`& SEC. 15 ACK.
`
`Aug. 24, 2015
`
`CASE ASSIGNED TO POST
`
`68335
`
`Jul. 24, 2015
`
`Jun. 08, 2010
`
`Mar. 23, 2010
`
`Mar. 03, 2010
`
`Feb. 17, 2010
`
`REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
`
`TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
`
`REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
`
`NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
`
`LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW
`
`76984
`
`COMPLETED
`
`Feb. 04, 2010
`
`APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL
`
`REGISTER
`
`Jan. 11, 2010
`
`TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE
`
`76984
`
`ENTERED
`
`Jan. 11, 2010
`
`76984
`
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/
`
`11/15/2019
`
`

`

`Status Search SN 3,799,570
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`Jan. 07, 2010
`
`TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
`
`CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW
`
`OFFICE
`
`Jan. 07, 2010
`
`Jan. 07, 2010
`
`Jan. 07, 2010
`
`Jul. 07, 2009
`
`Jul. 06, 2009
`
`Jun. 08, 2009
`
`RECEIVED
`
`EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
`
`JURISDICTION RESTORED TO
`
`EXAMINING ATTORNEY
`
`EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
`
`FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
`
`FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
`
`TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE
`
`ENTERED
`
`629048
`
`629048
`
`81093
`
`88889
`
`Jun. 08, 2009
`
`CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW
`
`88889
`
`OFFICE
`
`Jun. 08, 2009
`
`TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION
`
`Dec. 08, 2008
`
`Dec. 07, 2008
`
`Aug. 28, 2008
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED
`
`NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
`
`81093
`
`LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR
`
`76984
`
`ACTION
`
`Feb. 28, 2008
`
`REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION
`
`76984
`
`CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
`
`Aug. 28, 2007
`
`REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION
`
`76984
`
`CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
`
`Jan. 24, 2007
`
`REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION
`
`76984
`
`Jan. 23, 2007
`
`Jul. 21, 2006
`
`Jul. 20, 2006
`
`Jun. 28, 2006
`
`CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
`
`ASSIGNED TO LIE
`
`LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
`
`SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
`
`AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT
`
`ENTERED
`
`76984
`
`81093
`
`76984
`
`Jun. 15, 2006
`
`CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW
`
`76984
`
`Jun. 15, 2006
`
`Dec. 23, 2005
`
`Dec. 22, 2005
`
`Dec. 08, 2005
`
`May 19, 2005
`
`OFFICE
`
`PAPER RECEIVED
`
`NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED
`
`NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
`
`ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
`
`NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM
`
`81093
`
`81093
`
`TM Staff and Location Information
`
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/
`
`11/15/2019
`
`

`

`Status Search SN 3,799,570
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`TM Staff Information - None
`
`File Location
`
`Current Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
`
`Date in Location: Oct. 26, 20
`
`Assignment Abstract Of Title Information - Click to Load
`
`Proceedings - Click to Load
`
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/
`
`11/15/2019
`
`