throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1011045
`
`Filing date:
`
`10/24/2019
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91249874
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Plaintiff
`Smoky Mountain Winery, Inc.
`
`JOHN T WINEMILLER
`MERCHANT & GOULD PC
`P O BOX 2910
`MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
`UNITED STATES
`dockmpls@merchantgould.com, jwinemiller@merchantgould.com, akre-
`is@merchantgould.com
`865-380-5960
`
`Motion to Suspend for Civil Action
`
`JOHN T. WINEMILLER
`
`dockmpls@merchantgould.com, jwinemiller@merchantgould.com, akre-
`is@merchantgould.com
`
`/John T. Winemiller/
`
`10/24/2019
`
`Motion for Suspension of Proceedings Based on A Relevant Civil Ac-
`tion.pdf(605961 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`Smoky Mountain Winery, Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`King Distillery Co. LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91249874
`
`Mark: SMOKY MOUNTAIN
`MOONSHINE
`
`
`App. No. 88/195362
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`MOTION FOR SUSPENSION OF PROCEEDINGS BASED ON
`
`A RELEVANT CIVIL ACTION
`
`
`
`Opposer, Smoky Mountain Winery, Inc., hereby requests that the Board suspend this
`
`Opposition proceeding pending the outcome of a civil action involving the Applicant, King
`
`Distillery Co. By rule, “[w]henever it comes to the attention of the Board that a party or parties
`
`to a case pending before it are involved in a civil action that may have a bearing on the Board
`
`case, proceedings before the Board may be suspended until final determination of the civil
`
`action.” TBMP § 510.02(a) (emphasis added). Under these circumstances, the Board should
`
`suspend this Opposition proceeding until final determination of the civil action.
`
`In accordance with TBMP § 510.02(a), the Board will suspend proceedings in a case
`
`before it if the final determination of the other proceeding may have a bearing on the issues
`
`before the Board outside of any unusual circumstances. 37 C.F.R. § 2.117(a). See, e.g., New
`
`Orleans Louisiana Saints LLC v. Who Dat? Inc., 99 USPQ2d 1550, 1552 (TTAB 2011) (civil
`
`action need not be dispositive of Board proceeding, but only needs to have a bearing on issues
`
`

`

`before the Board); General Motors Corp v. Cadillac Club Fashions, Inc., 22 USPQ2d 1933,
`
`1936-37 (TTAB 1992) (relief sought in federal district court included an order directing Office to
`
`cancel registration involved in cancellation proceeding); Other Telephone Co. v. Connecticut
`
`National Telephone Co., 181 USPQ 125, 126-27 (TTAB 1974) (decision in civil action for
`
`infringement and unfair competition would have bearing on outcome of Trademark Act § 2(d)
`
`claim before Board), pet. denied, 181 USPQ 779 (Comm’r 1974). See also Tokaido v. Honda
`
`Associates Inc., 179 USPQ 861, 862 (TTAB 1973); Whopper-Burger, Inc. v. Burger King Corp.,
`
`171 USPQ 805, 806-07 (TTAB 1971); Martin Beverage Co. v. Colita Beverage Corp., 169
`
`USPQ 568, 570 (TTAB 1971).
`
`This Opposition involves no unusual circumstances. In this case, registration has been
`
`opposed by Opposer Smoky Mountain Winery on the grounds that it has superior rights in the
`
`mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN WINERY (U.S. Reg. No. 5672173); that Applicant King Distillery
`
`Co. LLC’s mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE (the subject of U.S. App. No.
`
`88/195362) so resembles Opposer’s registered SMOKY MOUNTAIN WINERY mark as applied
`
`to the goods identified in the Notice of Opposition as to be likely to cause confusion in trade; and
`
`that Opposer will therefore be damaged if Applicant were allowed to secure the registration for
`
`which it has made application.
`
`Applicant King Distillery Co. LLC is currently the defendant in civil litigation in the case
`
`of Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC v. King Distilling Co. LLC, No. 3:19-cv-00178-JRG-DCP, which is
`
`pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. A true and
`
`correct copy of the Ole Smoky Distillery Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`In the civil litigation, Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC (“Ole Smoky Distillery”) contests
`
`Applicant King Distillery Co. LLC’s purported use and registration of the mark SMOKY
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE (the subject of U.S. App. No. 88/195362) as an alleged
`
`infringement of Ole Smoky Distillery’s rights in numerous registered/incontestable trademarks,
`
`including the marks OLE SMOKY MOONSHINE (U.S. Reg. No. 5111844), OLE SMOKY
`
`TENNESSEE MOONSHINE (U.S. Reg. No. 4069789), and other OLE SMOKY-formative
`
`marks (e.g., OLE SMOKY MOONSHINE, U.S. Reg. No. 5111844) in connection with its
`
`distilled spirits and related merchandise. This civil action raises claims of federal trademark
`
`infringement, federal unfair competition, and federal dilution (among other claims) against
`
`Applicant King Distillery Co. regarding its use and attempted registration of the SMOKY
`
`MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE trademark.1
`
`
`
`A decision in Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC v. King Distilling Co. LLC regarding
`
`infringement and unfair competition may have a direct impact on the outcome of the Trademark
`
`Act § 2(d) claim asserted by Opposer before this Board. Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC seeks,
`
`among other remedies, to enjoin use and registration of the SMOKY MOUNTAIN
`
`MOONSHINE mark by Applicant King Distilling Co. A decision by the district court to enjoin
`
`use and intended registration of the SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE mark (also the subject
`
`matter of the pending opposition) by Applicant would directly impact this proceeding. If
`
`Applicant is enjoined from using the SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE mark, it cannot
`
`maintain the requisite intent-to-use or use of the opposed mark. Accordingly, Applicant would
`
`need to abandon the opposed application, resulting in all claims in the current opposition
`
`becoming moot. Therefore, suspension of this opposition proceedings will save time, effort, and
`
`expense for both the parties and the Board.
`
`
`1 Opposer notes that Ole Smoky Distillery and King Distilling Co. are parties in U.S. Opposition No. 91249782,
`wherein Ole Smoky Distillery has asserted claims of priority and likelihood of confusion, and dilution by blurring,
`against King Distilling Co. regarding its SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE trademark application (the same
`trademark application that is the subject of the current opposition between Smoky Mountain Winery and King
`Distilling Co.). This Opposition has been suspended pending final disposition of the aforementioned civil action.
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Based on the foregoing, Opposer respectfully requests suspension of this opposition
`
`pending a decision by the District Court in Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC v. King Distilling Co. LLC
`
`(Case No. 3:19-cv-00178-JRG-DCP)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Smoky Mountain Winery, Inc.,
`
`
`
`s/John T. Winemiller
`John T. Winemiller
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`P.O. Box 2910
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 865-380-5960
`dockmpls@merchantgould.com
`jwinemiller@merchantgould.com
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing MOTION FOR
`
`SUSPENSION OF PROCEEDINGS BASED ON A CIVIL ACTION was served via email
`on the 24th day of October 2019 upon the following attorney of record for Applicant:
`
`
`Mark S. Graham
`The Graham Law Firm
`7416 Kentfield Drive
`Knoxville, TN 37919
`mgraham@graham-iplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/John T. Winemiller
`John T. Winemiller
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`
`OLE SMOKY DISTILLERY, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` No. ______________________
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
`
`KING DISTILLING CO. LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff, Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC (“Ole Smoky”), for this Complaint against Defendant,
`
`King Distilling Co. LLC (“King Distilling”), states as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`Founded in 2010, Ole Smoky is the leading distiller of premium moonshine in the
`
`world and was the first federally licensed distillery in East Tennessee history. In 2009, Tennessee
`
`laws were changed to allow distilleries such as Ole Smoky to make and sell moonshine.
`
`2.
`
`Ole Smoky’s moonshine products can be found at its distilleries, online, in grocery
`
`and liquor stores nationwide, and on-premise at many of the largest sporting and entertainment
`
`venues in the U.S. Ole Smoky’s products also include branded apparel, gifts, and accessories.
`
`3.
`
`One of Ole Smoky’s moonshine distilleries located in East Tennessee is the most
`
`visited in the world, and each year over four million people visit Ole Smoky’s three East Tennessee
`
`distilleries.
`
`4.
`
`Seeking to capitalize on Ole Smoky’s success and explosive growth, King Distilling
`
`has taken substantial steps towards opening a distillery in Sevier County under the mark SMOKY
`
`

`

`MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE. King Distilling intends to offer both distilled spirits and branded
`
`apparel under the SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE mark.
`
`5.
`
`King Distilling’s planned “Smoky Mountain Moonshine” distillery is located in close
`
`proximity to Ole Smoky’s Sevier County distilleries. Further, the location of King Distilling’s
`
`distillery at which SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE will be sold is located on the primary
`
`thoroughfare to Ole Smoky’s distilleries in Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg along which Ole Smoky
`
`maintains a heavy presence through billboards and other advertising, and the millions of visitors to
`
`Ole Smoky’s distilleries are likely to be confused as to the source or affiliation of King Distilling’s
`
`goods as they relate to Ole Smoky’s goods.
`
`6.
`
`Despite being aware of Ole Smoky’s rights to its marks and the likelihood of
`
`consumer confusion, King Distilling continues to move forward with opening its retail location and
`
`selling distilled spirits and branded apparel under the SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE mark.
`
`PARTIES
`
`7.
`
`Ole Smoky is a Tennessee limited liability company and currently has its principal
`
`address at 236 E. Main St. #136, Sevierville, Tennessee 37862.
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling is a Tennessee limited liability company
`
`having an address at 5543 Edmondson Pike, Suite 240, Nashville, Tennessee 37211.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`This is an action for infringement of trademark and service mark rights and unfair
`
`competition under the common law and the United States Trademark Act of 1946 (the Lanham Act),
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.
`
`10.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C.
`
`2
`
`

`

`§ 1338(a), and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(b).
`
`11.
`
`Personal jurisdiction over King Distilling is proper because King Distilling is
`
`domiciled, conducts business, and has committed and will commit acts of trademark infringement in
`
`Tennessee.
`
`12.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because King Distilling
`
`has committed and will commit acts of trademark infringement and is opening a regular place of
`
`business in this judicial district.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`Ole Smoky Distillery’s Products and Marks
`
`13.
`
`Ole Smoky Distillery is and has been in the business of offering for sale high-quality
`
`distilled spirits and other goods throughout the United States since at least as early as 2010.
`
`14.
`
`Ole Smoky Distillery has continuously and substantially exclusively used the marks
`
`OLE SMOKY MOONSHINE, OLE SMOKY TENNESSEE MOONSHINE, and other OLE
`
`SMOKY-formative marks in connection with its distilled spirits and related merchandise since at
`
`least as early as 2010 (the “Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks”).
`
`15.
`
`Ole Smoky Distillery is the owner of multiple federal trademark registrations and
`
`pending applications for the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks covering distilled spirits and other related
`
`goods, including the marks shown in the below table of U.S. trademark registrations:
`
`Mark
`OLE SMOKY
`TENNESSEE
`MOONSHINE
`OLE SMOKY
`TENNESSEE
`MOONSHINE
`
`Reg. or Ser. No.
`4,069,788
`
`Filing Date
`Jan. 13, 2011
`
`5,141,616
`
`Jul. 9, 2016
`
`Goods
`Alcoholic beverages except
`beers
`
`Hats; shirts; sweatshirts;
`tank tops; tops; short-sleeved
`or long-sleeved t-shirts
`
`3
`
`

`

`5,087,832
`
`August 19, 2015
`
`Alcoholic beverages
`containing fruit; distilled
`spirits
`
`5,501,669
`
`August 19, 2015
`
`Hats; Headwear; Shirts;
`Tops as clothing
`
`5,501,671
`
`Nov. 1, 2017
`
`Shot glasses; beverage
`glassware
`
`4,069,789
`
`Jan. 13, 2011
`
`Alcoholic beverages except
`beers
`
`5,029,462
`
`Sep. 29, 2013
`
`OLE SMOKY
`MOONSHINE
`
`5,111,844
`
`Oct. 30, 2013
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`5,745,967
`
`May 7, 2019
`
`Button down shirts; hats;
`jackets; scarves; short-
`sleeved or long-sleeved t-
`shirts; sweatshirts; tank tops;
`tops; visors
`
`Button down shirts; hats;
`jackets; long-sleeved shirts;
`short-sleeved shirts; sweat
`shirts; tank tops; tops; visors;
`distilled spirits
`Retail store services
`featuring T-shirts, hoodies,
`hats, headwear, beanies,
`bandanas, ponchos, mugs,
`water bottles, shot glasses,
`candles, keychains, magnets,
`postcards, stickers, coasters,
`insulated sleeve holders for
`beverage containers, food
`products, soft drinks, and
`alcoholic beverages except
`beers; concession stand
`services featuring hot drinks,
`cold drinks, popcorn, ice
`
`4
`
`

`

`OLE SMOKY
`
`5,141,733
`
`Feb. 14, 2017
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,096,942
`
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,088,878
`
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`OLE SMOKY
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,092,396
`4,106,507
`
`Nov. 1, 2010
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,106,515
`
`Nov. 2, 2010
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,180,903
`
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`OLE SMOKY
`
`4,580,363
`
`Nov. 1, 2010
`
`cream, cotton candy,
`pretzels, nachos and cheese,
`hot dogs, and chips;
`entertainment services in the
`nature of live musical
`performances; entertainment
`services, namely, moonshine
`and whiskey tastings
`Alcoholic beverages except
`beers
`Short sleeve t-shirts, long
`sleeve t-shirts, sweatshirts,
`jackets, tops, button down
`shirts, tank tops, hats,
`stocking hats, scarves, and
`visors
`Mugs; shot glasses; reusable
`plastic and metal water
`bottles sold empty; flasks;
`insulated containers for
`beverage bottles and cans;
`moonshine jugs and glass
`jars
`Bags, namely, backpacks
`Non-alcoholic bloody mary
`mix and cocktail mixes
`Metal key chains and
`novelty signs made of wood
`Pens; pencils; novelty signs
`made of paper or cardboard;
`bumper stickers; note pads;
`merchandise bags
`Leather and imitation leather
`wallets
`
`16.
`
`As shown below, the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks prominently feature the term
`
`“Smoky”, often shown in close proximity to the term “Moonshine” that is also prominently featured
`
`in the stylized form of the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`5
`
`

`

`17.
`
`Ole Smoky offers more than 70 creative moonshine flavors in retail locations around
`
`the world. Ole Smoky’s moonshine products can be found at its distilleries, online, in grocery and
`
`liquor stores nationwide, and on-premise at many of the largest sporting and entertainment venues in
`
`the U.S. Ole Smoky’s products also include branded apparel, gifts, and accessories.
`
`18.
`
`In 2018, Ole Smoky received over 4 million visitors at its three retail locations in
`
`Sevier County, Tennessee. One of Ole Smoky’s moonshine distilleries located in East Tennessee is
`
`the most visited in the world. The over four million visitors to Ole Smoky’s distilleries is greater than
`
`the estimated total number of visitors to all of Scotland’s visitors combined and is significantly more
`
`than the estimated 1.4 million visitors to the ten distilleries located on Kentucky’s Bourbon Trail.
`
`19.
`
`Ole Smoky’s retail locations in Sevier County features self-guided tours, distilled
`
`spirit tastings, live music, and retail shopping including clothing. Ole Smoky’s three distilleries
`
`include THE HOLLER℠ and THE BARRELHOUSE℠ which are located in Gatlinburg, TN, and
`
`THE BARN℠ located in Pigeon Forge, TN. Ole Smoky has also recently opened a distillery and
`
`retail location in Nashville, TN.
`
`20.
`
`Ole Smoky has expended considerable time, effort, and expense in promoting,
`
`advertising, and making well-known among the purchasing public and the trade in general Ole
`
`Smoky’s goods offered and provided under the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks in commerce in the
`
`United States, with the result that Ole Smoky has established valuable and exclusive rights and
`
`goodwill in the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks as symbols of a source or origin of Ole Smoky’s
`
`6
`
`

`

`distilled spirit goods among the purchasing public and the trade in general.
`
`21.
`
`Ole Smoky advertises its products under the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks
`
`extensively throughout the United States and in East Tennessee. For example, Ole Smoky advertises
`
`under the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks on nearly 40 billboards located along I-40 between
`
`Knoxville and the North Carolina state line, and along Highway 66 between I-40 and Pigeon Forge.
`
`Each of Ole Smoky’s billboards located along Highway 66 between I-40 and Pigeon forge generate
`
`an estimated 14 million consumer impressions annually.
`
`22.
`
`By reason of their inherent distinctiveness and the extensive, intensive, and
`
`substantially continuous use, promotion, marketing, and advertisement thereof, the Ole Smoky
`
`Moonshine Marks are and have become distinctive, well known, and famous in commerce in the
`
`United States, and became well known and famous well before the first use or filing date of any mark
`
`owned by King Distilling.
`
`23.
`
`Ole Smoky has further developed substantial common law rights in and to the Ole
`
`Smoky Moonshine Marks by virtue of its substantially continuous use, promotion, marketing, and
`
`advertisement of goods under the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks, which are distinctive and well-
`
`known in the United States and throughout the world.
`
`24.
`
`The Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are valid and subsisting marks, owned and not
`
`abandoned by Ole Smoky for use with Ole Smoky’s distilled spirits and other goods.
`
`25.
`
`Ole Smoky is the owner and beneficiary of all goodwill associated with the use of the
`
`Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`King Distilling’s Planned Use of “Smoky Mountain Moonshine”
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling is the owner of record of U.S.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Trademark Application Serial No. 88/195,362 for the mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE
`
`(“the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark”).
`
`27.
`
`The application to register the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark was filed on
`
`November 15, 2018 and provides that King Distilling intends to use the Smoky Mountain Moonshine
`
`mark in connection with “distilled spirits” and “clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, t-shirts and hats.”
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling intends to offer various goods under the
`
`Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark including distilled spirits and clothing, which are identical to
`
`goods registered under the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`29.
`
`King Distilling has taken concrete and tangible steps towards using the Smoky
`
`Mountain Moonshine Mark in connection with distilled spirits, apparel, and other related goods.
`
`30.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling is in the process of opening a retail
`
`location and offering for sale distilled spirits, apparel, and other goods under the Smoky Mountain
`
`Moonshine Mark.
`
`31.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling has leased or purchased retail space
`
`located at 1970 Winfield Dunn Pkwy., Sevierville, TN 37876.
`
`32.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling intends to operate the Sevierville, TN
`
`location under the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`33.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling intends to manufacture and sell distilled
`
`spirit goods at the retail location in Sevierville, TN, and will further offer for sale goods including
`
`clothing and apparel at the same location, both under the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, King Distilling intends to offer distilled spirits with a
`
`label featuring the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`8
`
`

`

`35.
`
`King Distilling’s planned retail location is located approximately 10 miles from Ole
`
`Smoky’s Pigeon Forge location along Highway 66 and less than 0.5 miles from at least one of Ole
`
`Smoky’s billboards featuring the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks, and consumers visiting Ole Smoky’s
`
`Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg retail locations would pass King Distilling’s retail location when
`
`travelling to Ole Smoky’s retail locations along Highway 66.
`
`36.
`
`Concerned about the threat to its trademark rights, including the use of the Smoky
`
`Mountain Moonshine Mark, Ole Smoky sent a letter to counsel for King Distilling on December 21,
`
`2018, advising that continued efforts to register or use the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark were
`
`likely to cause confusion with the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks owned by Ole Smoky.
`
`37.
`
`Ole Smoky sent a follow up letter to counsel for King Distilling on January 23, 2019,
`
`again advising that continued efforts to register and use the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark
`
`would cause confusion with Ole Smoky’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks and to refute the assertions
`
`made in a response letter from King Distilling’s counsel dated January 10, 2019.
`
`38.
`
`King Distilling’s application to register the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark was
`
`published at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on April 2, 2019, and Plaintiff filed and was
`
`granted a first 90-day request for an extension of time to oppose Defendant’s application to register
`
`the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`39.
`
`Ole Smoky first learned that Defendant had taken additional steps towards using the
`
`Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark when the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (“TABC”)
`
`published its agenda for its meeting on April 23, 2019, and indicated that Defendant had sought
`
`approval to open its retail distillery in Sevierville.
`
`40.
`
`King Distilling has applied to the TABC for approval of a license to operate its
`
`9
`
`

`

`location under the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark at the 1970 Winfield Dunn Pkwy., Sevierville,
`
`TN 37876 location, and such approval was conditionally granted by the TABC on April 23, 2019.
`
`41.
`
`Despite Ole Smoky’s warnings, King Distilling has proceeded and continues to take
`
`steps to open its retail location in Sevierville under the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark with an
`
`awareness of Ole Smoky’s rights in and to the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks and without the consent
`
`or authorization of Ole Smoky.
`
`42.
`
`If King Distilling opens its location in Sevierville under the Smoky Mountain
`
`Moonshine Mark, Ole Smoky will be damaged by consumer confusion, brand erosion, loss of its
`
`profits, loss of goodwill, and other commercial and reputational harms.
`
`COUNT I: FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
`
`43.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`44.
`
`Defendant King Distilling’s current and future use of the Smoky Mountain
`
`Moonshine Mark is and will be a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a).
`
`45.
`
`The Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are valid and subsisting marks owned by Plaintiff.
`
`46. Without the consent of Plaintiff, Defendant has used and intends to use in commerce
`
`a mark that is a colorable imitation of the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks in connection with the sale,
`
`offering for sale, distribution, profitable use, or advertising of goods and services provided by
`
`Defendant by the use of the mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE.
`
`47. Without the consent of Plaintiff, Defendant has used and intends to use the mark
`
`SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE in a manner that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
`
`deceive, in that the mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE is to be used with goods and
`
`10
`
`

`

`services that are identical to those offered by Plaintiff and will therefore infringe on Plaintiff’s Ole
`
`Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`48.
`
`Defendant’s acts were and are being committed with the knowledge that the use of
`
`the mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE is likely to cause confusion with Plaintiff’s Ole
`
`Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`49.
`
`Plaintiff Ole Smoky has been and will continue to be damaged by Defendant’s use of
`
`the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`COUNT II: FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION
`
`50.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`51.
`
`The SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE Mark is confusingly similar to Plaintiff’s
`
`previously used Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks and are used for identical and highly related goods
`
`and/or services for which Plaintiff Ole Smoky has prior use of its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks; and
`
`use by Defendant in commerce of the SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE mark for Defendant’s
`
`goods and services as alleged herein is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and/or deception in
`
`violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
`
`52.
`
`Defendant’s use of the mark SMOKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE for Defendant’s
`
`goods and services falsely represents or suggests to the consumer and trade in general that the
`
`products and services sold, offered for sale, or advertised by Defendant are provided, distributed, or
`
`sold with the permission or authorization of Plaintiff or the source of goods and services provided,
`
`distributed, or sold under Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks, and/or that Defendant’s goods
`
`and services have been provided, manufactured, packaged, or distributed in compliance with the
`
`11
`
`

`

`quality standards maintained by Plaintiff for goods and services offered and sold under Plaintiff’s
`
`Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks, in further violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
`
`53.
`
`The unauthorized use by Defendant of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark as
`
`alleged above constitutes false designation of origin in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
`
`COUNT III: FEDERAL DILUTION
`
`54.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`55.
`
`Plaintiff’s registered Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are distinctive, famous and well-
`
`known by the general consuming public as designating the source of Plaintiff’s goods.
`
`56.
`
`Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark will cause dilution of the
`
`distinctive qualities of Plaintiff’s rights in its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks if Defendant begins
`
`selling goods and operating a retail location under the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`57.
`
`Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are distinctive and famous within the
`
`meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), and Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark is
`
`after Plaintiff’s marks became distinctive and famous.
`
`58.
`
`Defendant willfully intends to trade on Plaintiff’s reputation and goodwill or to cause
`
`dilution of Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks by its use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine
`
`Mark in connection with related goods and services.
`
`59.
`
`Plaintiff Ole Smoky will be damaged by loss of profits, loss of goodwill associated
`
`with its Ole Smoky Moonshine marks, loss of distinctiveness in and to the Ole Smoky Moonshine
`
`Marks, and other harm and damages caused by Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine
`
`Mark.
`
`12
`
`

`

`COUNT IV: COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
`
`60.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`61.
`
`Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark is an act of common law
`
`trademark infringement in that Defendant has used and plans to use in commerce a mark that is a
`
`colorable imitation of Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks in connection with the sale, offering
`
`for sale, distribution, and advertising of goods and services similar to those provided by Plaintiff
`
`under its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`62.
`
`Defendant plans to use the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark in such a manner as to
`
`cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive consumers because Defendant’s use of the Smoky
`
`Mountain Moonshine will be in close geographic proximity to areas in which Plaintiff sells goods,
`
`operates retail locations, and advertises under its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`63.
`
`The Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are strong and distinctive with respect to goods
`
`and services sold by Plaintiff under its marks.
`
`64.
`
`Defendant has used and intends to use the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark in
`
`connection with various goods including distilled spirits, clothing, and merchandise, which are
`
`identical to goods and services provided by Plaintiff under its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`65.
`
`Defendant’s acts have been and are being committed with the knowledge and intent
`
`to cause consumer confusion as to any association between goods sold by Defendant and those sold
`
`by Plaintiff under its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`66.
`
`Plaintiff has been and will be damaged by Defendant’s actions by loss of
`
`distinctiveness and goodwill in the Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks and loss of profits suffered by
`
`13
`
`

`

`Plaintiff.
`
`COUNT V: DILUTION UNDER THE TENNESSEE TRADEMARK ACT
`
`67.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`68.
`
`Defendant’s actions in connection with the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark will
`
`dilute the distinctive quality of Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks, which are distinctive and
`
`famous by way of Plaintiff’s substantial use and advertising of goods under the Ole Smoky
`
`Moonshine Marks as alleged herein.
`
`69.
`
`Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks are distinctive and famous within the
`
`meaning of T.C.A. § 47-25-513, and Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark is
`
`after Plaintiff’s marks became distinctive and famous.
`
`70.
`
`Defendant’s use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark have caused and will
`
`cause dilution of the distinctive qualities of Plaintiff’s rights in its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks and
`
`their ability to identify and distinguish the source of Plaintiff’s goods and services provided under the
`
`Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks from the sources of the same or similar goods or services offered by
`
`others in the state of Tennessee.
`
`71.
`
`Plaintiff has been and will be damaged by Defendant’s actions in that Plaintiff will
`
`suffer damages, injury, and irreparable harm.
`
`72.
`
`Defendants acts have been and are being committed willfully and knowingly.
`
`COUNT V: UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACTS UNDER THE TENNESSEE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
`
`73.
`
`Ole Smoky hereby re-alleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of all
`
`proceeding paragraphs of this Complaint.
`
`14
`
`

`

`74.
`
`Defendant’s actions alleged herein in connection with the Smoky Mountain
`
`Moonshine Mark will cause a likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to the source,
`
`sponsorship, approval or certification of Defendant’s goods as they related to goods sold by Plaintiff
`
`under its Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`75.
`
`Defendant’s actions are in violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act
`
`(T.C.A. § 47-18-101, et seq.). Specifically, Defendant’s actions constitute unfair or deceptive acts
`
`prohibited by the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act at T.C.A. § 47-18-104(b) under at least
`
`subsections (1), (2) and (3).
`
`76.
`
`Plaintiff has been and will be damaged by Defendant’s actions in that Plaintiff will
`
`suffer damages, injury, and irreparable harm.
`
`77.
`
`Defendant’s unfair or deceptive acts have been and are being committed willfully and
`
`in knowing violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act.
`
`WHEREFORE, Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC prays for judgment against King Distilling as
`
`follows and asks this Court to:
`
`a.
`
`Enter a Declaratory Judgment holding that King Distilling’s efforts to use the Smoky
`
`Mountain Moonshine Mark in connection with the goods and services described herein would likely
`
`cause confusion, infringe, dilute, injure and otherwise impair the distinctiveness, reputation, and
`
`goodwill of Plaintiff’s Ole Smoky Moonshine Marks.
`
`b.
`
`Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting King Distilling from
`
`opening its planned Sevierville, TN location or any other location or use of the Smoky Mountain
`
`Moonshine Mark.
`
`c.
`
`Hold Defendant’s conduct as being willful and/or exceptional as defined in the
`
`15
`
`

`

`Lanham Act at 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
`
`d.
`
`Award Ole Smoky actual or statutory damages in an amount to be determined and
`
`including any costs, attorney fees, lost profits, and other damages suffered by Ole Smoky as a result
`
`of Defendant’s planned and actual use of the Smoky Mountain Moonshine Mark.
`
`e.
`
`Award enhanced damages, including trebling of damage

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket