throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1052799
`
`Filing date:
`
`05/01/2020
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91245594
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Plaintiff
`Ibrahim M. Nasser
`
`IBRAHIM M NASSER
`PO BOX 5626
`CHULA VISTA, CA 91912
`UNITED STATES
`balweh@hotmail.com
`619-253-9624
`
`Other Motions/Papers
`
`Ibrahim Nasser
`
`balweh@hotmail.com
`
`/ibrahimnasser/
`
`05/01/2020
`
`Opposers Notice of failure to complete or comply Discovery Scent-
`blast.pdf(168389 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IBRAHIM NASSER and
`
`SERIOUS SCENTS,
`
`Opposition No.: 91245594
`
`Opposers,
`
` App. Serial No. 79/228,518
`
`V.
`
` Filing Date: December 14, 2017
`
`GIVAUDAN SA,
`
` Mark: SCENTBLAST
`
` Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FAILURE TO COMPLETE OR COMPLY DISCOVERY
`
`The Trademark Trial And Appeal Board
`
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`Kathryn E. Smith and Paul J. Linden
`
`Please be advised and noticed:
`
`Discovery was tendered to you on April 06, 2020.
`
`A true copy of same is being electronically filed with the Trademark Board Court. You
`
`have failed to respond completely. You didn’t Answer after properly noticed and been
`
`served on April 06, 2020 and not answered .
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`If you do not satisfy the discovery request, or withdraw your application for the
`
`scentblast Trademark I will move the Trademark Board for a summary judgment and
`
`dismissal of your application.
`
`I await your prompt and positive notice of withdrawal and abandonment of this
`
`Trademark Infringement. You can avoid the other cost that will follow in collection of
`
`damages in the District Federal Court.
`
`
`
`Verification Of Pleading and Notice:
`
`I Ibrahim M. Nasser verify this pleading to be true and correct under the penalty of
`
`perjury of the the Law of the State of California and The Federal Court Rules
`
`Entered in on May 01, 2020.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Ibrahim M. Nasser
`Owner/Serious Scents
`P.O.Box 5626

`Chula Vista, CA 91912
`Tel: (619) 253-9624
`balweh@hotmail.com
`
`/Ibrahim Nasser/
`
`_____________________
`
`Ibrahim M. Nasser
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I ROBY LISTER hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF
`
`FAILURE TO COMPLETE OR COMPLY DISCOVERY was served upon
`
`Respondents’ Kathryn E. Smith and Paul J. Linden attorneys of record via first class
`
`mail, email on the 1st day of May 2020, I am not a party to this cause of action. I am over
`
`the age of 18 years and reside at 356 Roosevelt St #2 Chula Vista, CA 91910.
`
`Served via first class mail the following address:
`
`Kathryn E. Smith, Esq.
`Wood Herron & Evans LLP

`441 Vine Street, 2700 Carew Tower

`Cincinnati, OH 45202

`Phone: (513) 241-2324

`Email: ksmith@whe-law.com
`
`Paul J. Linden, Esq.
`Wood Herron & Evans LLP

`441 Vine Street, 2700 Carew Tower

`Cincinnati, OH 45202

`Phone: (513) 241-2324

`Email: plinden@whe-law.com
`
`
`/Roby Lister/
`___________________
`Roby Lister
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`OPPOSER’S INTERROGATORIES
`
`Opposer, Ibrahim Nasser and Serious Scents, requests that GIVAUDAN SA, respond to
`
`the following interrogatories. You are required to answer these interrogatories truthfully
`
`separately and fully in writing, under oath and the penalty of perjury.
`
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`A. Each Interrogatory is to be answered fully on the basis of information which is in
`
`your possession or access or knowledge of.
`
`B. In each of your answers to these Interrogatories, you are requested and legally required
`
`to provide not only such information as in your possession, but also information as is
`
`reasonably available or that you have knowledge of. In the event that you are able to
`
`provide only partial response the information called for by any particular Interrogatory,
`
`please provide all the information in your possession, or that you have knowledge of.
`
`You are required to provide a statement that explains in detail the who, what where and
`
`why you lack the inability to provide the requested information or any portion or
`
`remainder of that information no matter it’s form or content, location, or disposition.
`
`
`
`C. If you object to or otherwise decline to answer any portion of any Interrogatory,
`
`you are required to provide a statement that explains in detail the who, what where and
`
`why you refuse or object to providing the requested and legally required information or
`
`any portion or remainder of that information no matter it’s form or content, location, or
`
`disposition all information called for by that any portion of the Interrogatory to which
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`you do not object or to which you do not decline to answer. For those portions of an
`
`Interrogatory to which you object or to which you do not decline to answer, state the
`
`reason for such objection or declination in detail.
`
`
`
`1. Please Explain in Detail: The Legal Basis & Use of Scentblast that is in Dispute As
`
`Defined By Sub Parts Of (a-e:) as allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1).
`
`Please see footnote1
`
`
`
`a. Explain in detail the original source of the Scentblast you have laid claim to in the case
`at bar.
`
`b. Please define original though process that resulted caused and created Scentblast
`Trademark
`
`c. Please define and supply any and all pertinent facts that supports your present and
`continuing legal right claim title to use and apply Scentblast Trademark that is in dispute.
`
`d. Provide copy of any and all documentation that supports your legal right to use of
`Scentblast.
`
`e. Please define the dates of first use that resulted caused and created Scentblast
`
`
`1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1). (a) In General. (1) Number. Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a
`party may serve on any other party no more than 25 written interrogatories, including all discrete subparts. Leave to serve
`additional interrogatories may be granted to the extent consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2).Court Rejects Black Letter
`Numerical Limit on Interrogatories Court adopts “related question approach” in requiring party to answer discrete subparts
`
`A federal district court compelled a patent litigation defendant to answer interrogatories which the defendant contended exceeded the
`numerical limit imposed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1). The court held that in the context of patent litigation involving
`only one accused product and sufficiently related patents, an interrogatory with multiple subparts will be counted as a single
`interrogatory for purposes of the Rule 33 limit.
`
`In Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc., the plaintiff sued the defendant for patent infringement based on just one allegedly infringing
`product. The plaintiff moved to compel responses to interrogatories, which the defendant opposed because it had previously answered
`the plaintiff’s first set of five interrogatories with at least 21 different subparts.
`
` THE DEFENDANT ARGUED that responding to plaintiff’s second set of interrogatories would exceed the 25 interrogatory
`limit. The court examined whether the case involved more than one accused product, the number of patents in the suit, and whether
`interrogatories that asked for facts, documents, and witnesses related to a discrete subject or contention. Although there were four
`patents in the suit, the court concluded that there was only one accused product and the patent applications were sufficiently related to
`be the subject of a single inquiry.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Trademark at issue.
`
`
`
`2. Please Explain in Detail of all persons who you may rely upon to support Scentblast
`
`Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar.:
`
`a. Supply the name
`
`b. Addresses
`
`c. Phone Numbers
`
`d. Relationship
`
`e. Type of Transaction
`
`f. Date of Transaction
`
`
`
`3. Please Explain of all payments made to any of the following in Detail who you may
`
`rely upon to Support Scentblast Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Supply the name
`
`b. Addresses
`
`c. Phone Numbers
`
`d. Relationship
`
`e. Type of Transaction
`
`f. Date of Transaction
`
`g. Service Provided
`
`h. Amount of Transaction
`
`i. Date of Delivery of Product or Service
`
`j. True Copy of Invoice
`
`k. Mode of Payment
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`4. Please Explain of all payments received from the sales of Scentblast Trademark
`
`Products
`
`any of the following in Detail who you may rely upon to Support Scentblast Trademark
`
`you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Supply the Name Buyer
`
`b. Buyer Addresses
`
`c. Buyers Phone Numbers
`
`d. Buyer Relationship Date Established
`
`e. Buyer Sales Transaction
`
`d. Buyer Grenade Trademark Date of Transaction
`
`f. Service Provided to Buyer
`
`g. Amount of Transaction
`
`h. Date of Delivery of Product or Service to Buyer
`
`i. True Copy of Invoice to Buyer
`
`j. Mode of Payment by buyer
`
`
`
`5. Please Explain of all payments made to all raw material suppliers used in the creation
`
`for the sales of Scentblast Trademark Products any of the following in Detail who you
`
`may rely upon to Support Scentblast Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Supplier’s Name Buyer
`
`b. Supplier’s Addresses
`
`c. Supplier’s Phone Numbers
`
`d. Supplier’s Relationship Date Established
`
`e. Supplier’s Sales Transaction
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`f. Supplier’s Grenade Trademark Date of Transaction
`
`g. Service Provided to from Supplier’s to Your Business
`
`h. Amount of Transaction with Supplier’s
`
`i. Date of Delivery of Product or Service to your business from Supplier’s
`
`j. True Copy of all Invoice Supplier’s invoices from start date to current date.
`
`
`
`6. Please Explain of all payments made to all legal services used in the creation for the
`
`sales of Scentblast Trademark Products any of the following in Detail who you may rely
`
`upon to Support Scentblast Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Trade Mark Researchers Name
`
`b. Researchers Addresses
`
`c Researchers Phone Numbers
`
`d. Researchers Relationship Date Established
`
`e. Researchers Transaction
`
`d. Researchers Grenade Trademark Date of Transaction
`
`f. Researchers who Provided Your Business with trademark research
`
`g. Amount of paid to and for Legal Trademark Researchers
`
`h. Date of Delivery of Trademark Researchers Service to your business
`
`i. True Copy of all Invoice of Trademark Researchers Service to your business
`
`invoices from start date to current date.
`
`
`
`7. Please supply in detain under what legal theory you claim you may be entitled to rely
`
`upon to Support Scentblast Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Are you Claiming First Use as the theory you claim you may to rely upon that entitles
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`and supports that claimed right explain in detail:
`
`b. If you elect to use First use claim please supply true copies of
`
`
`
`1. Legal Authorities to support those claim of First Trademark use you have laid claim to
`in the case at bar:
`
`
`
`2. Define Persons who will be called as witnesses to support your first use claim
`
`Scentblast Trademark you have laid claim to in the case at bar:
`
`a. Witnesses Name
`
`b. Witnesses Addresses
`
`c. Witnesses Phone Numbers
`
`d. Witnesses Relationship
`
`e. Date Witnesses Relationship was established
`
`d. Does Witnesses Have a pecuniary interest in your business
`
`f. Supplier’s Grenade Trademark Date of Transaction
`
`g. Service Provided to from Supplier’s o Your Business
`
`h. Amount of Transaction with Supplier’s
`
`i. Date of Delivery of Product or Service to your business from Supplier’s
`
`j. True Copy of all Invoice Supplier’s invoices
`
`
`
`Please note any failure to respond appropriately as required by law may diminish or
`
`extinguish your rights and protection of the disputed Trademark and use of same.
`
`Dated: April 06, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By /Ibrahim Nasser/
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`Opposer
`Ibrahim M. Nasser
`Serious Scents P.O.Box 5626
`Chula Vista, CA 91912
`Phone: (619) 253-9624
`Email: balweh@hotmail.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the forgoing OPPOSER’S
`
`INTERROGATORIES has been served on Givaudan SA Counsel by forwarding said
`
`copy on, April 06, 2020 via email to:
`
`
`Kathryn E. Smith and Paul J. Linden, Esq.
`Wood Herron & Evans LLP

`441 Vine Street, 2700 Carew Tower

`Cincinnati, OH 45202

`Phone: (513) 241-2324

`Email: ksmith@whe-law.com, plinden@whe-law.com,
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 06, 2020
`
`/Ibrahim Nasser/
`
`____________________
`
`Ibrahim M. Nasser
`P.O.Box 5626

`
`Chula Vista, CA 91912
`
`Phone: (619) 253-9624
`
`Email: balweh@hotmail.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket