`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov
`
`June 14, 2019
`
`Opposition No. 91241441
`
`Apple Inc.
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Rochelle Adams, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`Neharia, Inc.
`
`Applicant’s consented motion filed June 8, 2019 to extend time to file its answer
`
`to the notice of opposition is granted.1 Trademark Rule 2.127(a). An answer must be
`
`filed through ESTTA, the Board’s Electronic System for Trademark Trials and
`
`Appeals. See Trademark Rule 2.106(b)(1)/2.114(b)(1).
`
`Status Report Required for Future Motions to Suspend or Extend for
`
`Settlement
`
`The Board retains discretion to condition the approval of a consented or stipulated
`
`motion to suspend on the party or parties providing necessary information about the
`
`
`1 When parties stipulate to the rescheduling of a deadline for pretrial disclosures and
`subsequent testimony periods or to the rescheduling of the closing date for discovery and the
`rescheduling of subsequent deadlines for pretrial disclosures and testimony periods, a
`stipulation presented in the form used in a trial order, signed by the parties, or a motion in
`said form signed by one party and including a statement that every other party has agreed
`thereto, shall be submitted to the Board through ESTTA, with the relevant dates set forth
`and an express statement that all parties agree to the new dates. Trademark Rule 2.121(d).
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91241441
`
`status of settlement talks, discovery activities, or trial activities, as may be
`
`appropriate. See Trademark Rule 2.117(c); TBMP §§ 510 and 605.02.
`
`Due to the number of extensions approved thus far in this proceeding, the Board
`
`imposes a condition on the approval of all future motions to suspend or extend for
`
`settlement. Specifically, to establish good cause for all future motions to suspend or
`
`extend, the parties must include in the motion a status report setting forth what
`
`specific efforts the parties have made towards settlement during the previous period
`
`of suspension. The report must set forth, at a minimum, 1) all dates on which the
`
`parties communicated, and the method of each communication (e.g. telephone
`
`conferences, emails,
`
`in-person meetings), 2) the general nature of each
`
`communication, 3) the issues that have been resolved, 4) the issues that remain to be
`
`resolved or that remain for trial, and 5) a proposed timetable for resolution of the
`
`remaining issues. Appropriately designated confidential information or materials
`
`may be filed under seal pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.126(c). See TBMP § 605.02.
`
`Due to this requirement, the parties may no longer use the ESTTA ”Consent
`
`Motions” forms to submit motions to extend or suspend dates for settlement. Rather,
`
`the parties must select the “Opposition, Cancellation or Concurrent Use (general
`
`filings)” option, the “Scheduling Motions” option, then the “Motion to Suspend for
`
`Settlement Discussions” form to which the parties may attach the motion they
`
`prepared. The motion must set forth both the required status report and a proposed
`
`trial schedule.2 The requirement to use the general filings ESTTA form is limited to
`
`
`2 When parties stipulate to the rescheduling of a deadline for pretrial disclosures and
`subsequent testimony periods or to the rescheduling of the closing date for discovery and the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91241441
`
`consent motions based on settlement discussions, and does not prohibit the use of
`
`ESTTA consent forms for other filings.
`
`Absent the required status report, a motion to suspend or extend may be denied,
`
`even if consented to by the parties. If the Board denies such a motion, dates may
`
`remain as previously set. See TBMP § 509.01(a).
`
`Accordingly, answer, conference, disclosure, discovery and trial dates, are reset
`
`as follows:
`
`Time to Answer
`Deadline for Discovery Conference
`Discovery Opens
`Initial Disclosures Due
`Expert Disclosures Due
`Discovery Closes
`Plaintiff's Pretrial Disclosures Due
`Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends
`Defendant's Pretrial Disclosures Due
`Defendant's 30-day Trial Period Ends
`Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due
`Plaintiff's 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends
`Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due
`Defendant's Brief Due
`Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due
`Request for Oral Hearing (optional) Due
`
`7/8/2019
`8/8/2019
`8/8/2019
`9/7/2019
`1/5/2020
`2/4/2020
`3/20/2020
`5/4/2020
`5/19/2020
`7/3/2020
`7/18/2020
`8/17/2020
`10/16/2020
`11/15/2020
`11/30/2020
`12/10/2020
`
`
`Generally, the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to Board trials. Trial testimony is
`
`taken and introduced out of the presence of the Board during the assigned testimony
`
`periods. The parties may stipulate to a wide variety of matters, and many
`
`requirements relevant to the trial phase of Board proceedings are set forth in
`
`
`rescheduling of subsequent deadlines for pretrial disclosures and testimony periods, a
`stipulation presented in the form used in a trial order, signed by the parties, or a motion in
`said form signed by one party and including a statement that every other party has agreed
`thereto, shall be submitted to the Board through ESTTA, with the relevant dates set forth
`and an express statement that all parties agree to the new dates. Trademark Rule 2.121(d).
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91241441
`
`Trademark Rules 2.121 through 2.125. These include pretrial disclosures, matters in
`
`evidence, the manner and timing of taking testimony, and the procedures for
`
`submitting and serving testimony and other evidence, including affidavits,
`
`declarations, deposition transcripts and stipulated evidence. Trial briefs shall be
`
`submitted in accordance with Trademark Rules 2.128(a) and (b). Oral argument at
`
`final hearing will be scheduled only upon the timely submission of a separate notice
`
`as allowed by Trademark Rule 2.129(a).
`
`
`
`4
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site