throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA900021
`05/31/2018
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding.
`
`91240730
`
`Defendant
`Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A.
`
`Plaintiff
`Itec, LLC
`
`No
`
`Applicant
`
`Other Party
`
`Have the parties
`held their discov-
`ery conference
`as required under
`Trademark Rules
`2.120(a)(1) and
`(a)(2)?
`
`Motion for Suspension in View of Civil Proceeding With Consent
`
`The parties are engaged in a civil action which may have a bearing on this proceeding. Accordingly, Hyperion
`Entertainment C.V.B.A. hereby requests suspension of this proceeding pending a final determination of the
`civil action. Trademark Rule 2.117.
`Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. has secured the express consent of all other parties to this proceeding for
`the suspension and resetting of dates requested herein.
`Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. has provided an email address herewith for itself and for the opposing party
`so that any order on this motion may be issued electronically by the Board.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`of record by Email on this date.
`Respectfully submitted,
`/rexadonnelly/
`Rex A. Donnelly
`radonnelly@ratnerprestia.com
`tmde@ratnerprestia.com, jfrankland@ratnerprestia.com
`05/31/2018
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the Matter of:
`Application Serial No. 87/329,469
`Published in the Official Gazette
`On December 26, 2017
`
`
`ITEC, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`HYPERION ENTERTAINMENT C.V.B.A.,
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Mark: Boing Ball Logo
`
`Opposition No.: 91240730
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO SUSPEND PROCEEDINGS
`Pursuant to Rule 37 C.F.R. § 2.117(a) and TBMP § 510.02, Opposer Itec, LLC (“Itec”)
`
`and Applicant Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. (“Hyperion”) stipulate that this opposition
`
`proceeding be suspended pending the final determination of a pending civil action involving both
`
`parties which will have a direct bearing on this proceeding.
`
`
`
`The parties state the following:
`
`1.
`
`On March 13, 2018, Hyperion commenced a civil action, captioned “Hyperion
`
`Entertainment C.V.B.A. v. Itec LLC, Amiga, Inc., Amino Development Corporation [(collectively,
`
`the “Amiga Parties)] and Cloanto Corporation,” in the United States District Court for the
`
`Western District of Washington (WDWA18-cv-00381-RSM) (the “Civil Action”). A copy of
`
`the Complaint from the Civil Action is attached as Exhibit 1.
`
`2.
`
`The Complaint alleges, among other things, issues in common with those in the
`
`present proceeding. In the Civil Action, Hyperion seeks, among other relief, (a) judgment that
`
`Applicant is the rightful owner of the Boing Ball logo mark pursuant to a settlement agreement
`
`

`

`with the Amiga Parties and (b) judgment as to whether the Amiga Parties, or which among them,
`
`owns any portion of the Boing Ball logo mark.
`
`3.
`
`It is the policy of the Board to suspend proceedings when the parties are involved
`
`in a civil action that may have a bearing on the Board case. 37 C.F.R. § 2.117(a). Because the
`
`District Court’s determination as to ownership of the Boing Ball logo mark will be binding upon
`
`the Board, the parties respectfully request that the TTAB exercise its discretion to suspend the
`
`instant proceeding pending final determination of the Civil Action.
`
`4.
`
`Moreover, suspending this proceeding pending the final determination of the Civil
`
`Action will promote judicial economy.
`
`
`
`
`/James T. Hultquist/
`James T. Hultquist, Esq.
`Clark W. Lackert, Esq.
`Jillian L. Burstein, Esq.
`REED SMITH LLP
`10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 207-1000 (phone)
`(312) 207-6400 (fax)
`jhulquist@reedsmith.com
`clackert@reedsmith.com
`jburstein@reedsmith.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer, Itec, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Rex A. Donnelly/
`Rex A. Donnelly, Esq. (#3492)
`RatnerPrestia
`1007 Orange Street, Suite 205
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 778-2500 (phone)
`(302) 778-2600 (fax)
`radonnelly@ratnerprestia.com
`
`Attorney for Applicant,
`Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A.
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the document identified below has been served via
`
`the method stated below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date of Service:
`
`May 31, 2018
`
`Title of Document:
`
`Party Served:
`
`Joint Stipulation to Suspend Proceedings
`
`James T. Hultquist, Esq.
`Clark W. Lackert, Esq.
`Jillian L. Burstein, Esq.
`REED SMITH LLP
`10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4000
`Chicago, IL 60606
`jhulquist@reedsmith.com
`clackert@reedsmith.com
`jburstein@reedsmith.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer, Itec, LLC
`
`Type of Service:
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`
`/Rex A. Donnelly/
`Rex A. Donnelly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`AT SEATTLE
`
`
`
`No. 2:18-cv-00381
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
`JUDGMENT AND BREACH OF
`CONTRACT
`
`
`
`
`HYPERION ENTERTAINMENT C.V.B.A.,
`
`
`
`
`
`ITEC, LLC, a New York limited liability
`company; AMIGA, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; AMINO DEVELOPMENT
`CORPORATION, a Washington corporation;
`and CLOANTO CORPORATION, a Nevada
`Corporation
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT
`CASE No. 2:18-cv-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 2 of 26
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. (“Hyperion” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
`attorneys, and for its Complaint against Defendants Itec, LLC (“Itec”), Amiga, Inc. (“Amiga”),
`Amino Development Corporation (“Amino”) (Itec, Amiga, and Amino collectively referred to as
`“the Amiga Parties”) and Cloanto Corporation (“Cloanto”) (all of the foregoing collectively referred
`to as “Defendants”), states and alleges the following:
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`This is an action for (i) breach of contract, (ii) a declaratory judgment that Hyperion
`1.
`is the owner of all right, title and interest in certain intellectual property rights as detailed further
`herein; (iii) declaratory judgment that Hyperion does not infringe U.S. Copyright TX0003282574;
`(iv) declaratory judgment of no trademark infringement and no unfair competition by Hyperion (v)
`declaratory judgment that Hyperion has a non-exclusive license in the AMIGA trademark, (vi) an
`order directing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to uphold Hyperion’s Opposition
`No. 91237628 filed against Cloanto’s U.S. Trademark Application Ser. No. 91237628 for AMIGA,
`and (vii) intentional interference with contract or business expectancy for which Hyperion seeks
`equitable relief.
`All of the issues in this case arise from a Settlement Agreement entered via Stipulated
`2.
`Judgment by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez of this Court on December 14, 2009, in the matter
`of Amiga, Inc. v. Hyperion VOF, 2:07-cv-00631-RSM (“the Prior Washington Action”). A copy of
`the Stipulated Judgment including the Settlement Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1.
`The Settlement Agreement states in Paragraph 16: “The Parties agree that any
`3.
`dispute arising from the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement shall be resolved solely
`through litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.” Ex. 1 at p. 36.
`On information and belief, the Amiga Parties are in material breach and/or default
`4.
`of the Settlement Agreement. Further, certain actions or inactions by the Amiga Parties and by
`Cloanto require the Court’s interpretation and enforcement of the Agreement. Still further, actions
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 1
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 3 of 26
`
`
`
`of all Defendants have caused injury to Plaintiff for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law,
`thereby compelling Plaintiff to bring this action.
`Hyperion’s rights under the Settlement Agreement are material to resolution of
`5.
`claims alleged by Cloanto in the matter of Cloanto Corporation v. Hyperion Entertainment
`C.V.B.A. (Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1353 (LEK/ATB), brought by Cloanto in the United States
`District Court for the Northern District of New York (“the New York Action”), and for that reason,
`Hyperion has requested that the New York Action be transferred to this Court for consolidation with
`this Action.
`
`PARTIES
`Plaintiff Hyperion is a Belgian limited liability company having a principal place
`6.
`of business at Avenue de Tervueren 34, Brussels, BELGIUM 1040.
`On information and belief, Defendant Itec is a New York limited liability company
`7.
`having a business address C/O Reed Smith LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor, New York,
`NY 10022.
`On information and belief, Defendant Amiga is or was a Delaware corporation
`8.
`having as its registered agent the Corporation Service Company, of 251 Little Falls Drive,
`Wilmington, DE 19808, and has or had its administrative seat at 34935 SE Douglas Street,
`Snoqualmie, WA 98065, UBI 602621140.
`On information and belief, Defendant Amino is an inactive Washington
`9.
`corporation having as its registered agent the Corporation Service Company, having an address of
`300 Deschutes Way SW, Ste. 304, Tumwater, WA 98501, UBI 601983734.
`On information and belief, Defendant Cloanto is a Nevada corporation having an
`10.
`address of 5940 S. Rainbow Blvd, Suite 400 #67834, Las Vegas, NV 891187-2507.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to the
`11.
`provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, and 2201; 17 U.S.C. § 501; and 15 U.S.C. §§ 1121 and 1125,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 2
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 4 of 26
`
`
`
`in that this action arises under the copyright and trademark laws of the United States, and Plaintiffs
`seek Declaratory and injunctive relief, and equitable relief for breach of contract, and for intentional
`interference with contract or business expectancy, under the principles of supplemental jurisdiction
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Amiga Parties because the Amiga Parties
`12.
`and Plaintiff are parties to the Settlement Agreement, which expressly provides in ¶ 16 that any
`disputes relating thereto shall be resolved “solely through litigation in the U.S. District Court for the
`Western District of Washington.”
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Cloanto, because in the New York Action,
`13.
`Cloanto repeatedly asserts its own interpretation of the Settlement Agreement, thereby admitting that
`Cloanto’s claims rest on interpretation of the Settlement Agreement. Further, on information and
`belief, Cloanto conducts and has conducted business in the State of Washington, including but not
`limited to business transactions with the Amiga Parties, which transactions give rise to the dispute in
`this case. Additionally, on information and belief, Cloanto has advertised and sold and continues to
`advertise and sell products within this judicial district, including Cloanto’s “Amiga Forever” operating
`system emulator, which is offered through Cloanto’s “Online Store” at www.amigaforever.com. On
`information and belief, the “Amiga Forever” product and other Cloanto products incorporate Amiga
`IP that is the subject of the Settlement Agreement. On information and belief, the “Amiga Forever”
`product has been downloaded by purchasers in this district, and has been shipped by Cloanto on
`physical media to buyers in this district, in combination with DVD video content. Cloanto
`purposefully directs its advertising and promotional activities to buyers in this district.
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
`14.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 3
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 5 of 26
`
`
`
`A.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`History through the Settlement Agreement
`The Amiga operating system software, originally developed by Commodore for its
`15.
`line of Amiga computers, has been credited as having launched the multi-media computing
`revolution in 1987.
`Hyperion is the developer of an Amiga operating system known as AmigaOS 4.
`16.
`17.
`Through a chain of subsequent events, various intellectual property rights relating to
`Amiga software, including trademark and copyright rights, (“the Amiga IP”) became subject to a
`hotly contested dispute, the facts and allegations of which are of record in the Prior Washington
`Action, which allegations were resolved between Plaintiff and the Amiga Parties via the Settlement
`Agreement.
`18.
`
`The Amiga IP addressed in the Settlement Agreement includes:
`“Amiga Mark,” as defined in Definition c. of the Settlement
`a.
`Agreement to mean “any mark owned and/or registered or licensed
`by or to the Amiga Parties containing the word “Amiga” whether in
`stylized form (figurative mark) or otherwise.”
`“Exclusive Licensed Marks,” as defined in Definition g. of the
`Settlement Agreement to mean AmigaOS, Amiga OS, AmigaOne,
`and Amiga One.
`“Software,” as defined in Definition n. of the Settlement Agreement
`to mean “Amiga OS 3.1 Software, which is the Operating system
`(including without limitation its Software Architecture as described
`in the Documentation1) originally developed, owned and marketed
`by Commodore Business Machines (CMB) for their Amiga line of
`computers in 1994.”
`“Documentation,” as defined in Definition f. of the Settlement
`Agreement to mean “the publications listed on Exhibit 4 hereof [to
`the Settlement Agreement]”
`“Licensed Marks,” as defined in Definition i. of the Settlement
`Agreement to mean “the Exclusive Licensed Marks and the “Boing
`Ball” logo mark (i.e. the checkered ball)” (depicted infra).
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`
`1 “Documentation” being further defined in Definition f. of the Settlement Agreement to mean “the publications listed
`in Exhibit 4 [of the Settlement Agreement],” which Exhibit lists five Manuals and their corresponding ISBN
`numbers.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 4
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 6 of 26
`
`
`
`f.
`
`“AmigaOS 4,” as defined in Definition d. of the Settlement
`Agreement to mean “the Operating System developed by Hyperion
`and based in part on the Software, including without limitation the
`Software Architecture of the Software as described in the
`Documentation, in any version, (irrespective of version numbering,
`e.g., AmigaOS 5).
`See Exhibit 1 at pp. 29-30.
`
`Pursuant to the Grant clause in paragraph 1(b), the Settlement Agreement grants
`
`19.
`Plaintiff:
`. . . an exclusive, perpetual, worldwide and royalty-free, transferable right and Object
`Code and Source Code license to the Software in order to use, develop, modify,
`commercialize, distribute and market the Software in any form (including through
`sublicensing), on any medium (now known or otherwise), through any means
`(including but not limited to making AmigaOS 4 available to the public via the
`internet) and for any current or future hardware platform.
`
`Id.at p. 31.
`Pursuant to the Grant clause in paragraph 1(c), the Settlement Agreement grants
`20.
`Plaintiff “an exclusive, perpetual, worldwide and royalty-free, transferable right and license to use
`the Exclusive Licensed Marks and the Software.” Id. at p. 32.
`Paragraph 7 of the Settlement Agreement contains Plaintiff’s express reservation of
`21.
`independent rights to the Licensed marks, which states that nothing in the Settlement Agreement
`“shall be construed as a waiver or abandonment” thereof. Id. at p. 35.
`Paragraph 18 of the Settlement Agreement grants Plaintiff a Security Interest in
`22.
`“Collateral” -- defined as in Definition e. of the Settlement Agreement to mean “the Exclusive
`Licensed Marks, the Software, and the ‘Boing Ball’ logo mark.” Id. at pp. 37, 29.
`Paragraph 18(c) of the Settlement Agreement confers upon and entitles Plaintiff to
`23.
`foreclose on the Security Interest in the Collateral in the event of a default by the Amiga Parties and
`an acquirer . . . of . . . assets including the Collateral. Id. at p. 38.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 5
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 7 of 26
`
`
`
`Specifically, Paragraph 18(c) of the Settlement Agreement states that “[i]f an
`24.
`acquirer or buyer of stock or assets including the Collateral (or part thereof) under §152 refuses to
`execute the appropriate form of Exhibit 33 hereto prior to or at the closing of the acquisition or
`purchase, then the Amiga Parties and the acquirer or buyer will be deemed to be in default under
`the terms of this Agreement. Hyperion is then authorized to foreclose on its Security Interest in the
`Collateral.” Id.
`Paragraph 13 of the Settlement Agreement confers upon Plaintiff a power to enforce
`25.
`its rights in the Exclusive Licensed Marks, the Software, and the Boing Ball Logo Mark in the event
`of the Amiga Parties elect not to, or do not, exercise such rights. Id. at p. 35.
`The rights granted to Plaintiff by the Settlement Agreement were, in accordance with
`26.
`Paragraph 1(b), “[w]ithout prejudice to any Existing License Agreement,” wherein the term Existing
`License Agreement is defined in Definition h. of the Settlement Agreement as having been provided
`in a “complete and exhaustive list attached to [the Settlement Agreement] as Exhibit 1.” Id. at pp.
`31.
`
`Exhibit 1 to the Settlement Agreement lists a license to “Cloanto Italia srl” for
`27.
`“various licenses commencing in 1994” for an “indefinite term,” listing a “worldwide” territory,
`and a scope of “[r]ights sufficient to support Amiga Forever, including emulation modules.” Id. at
`p. 44.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Cloanto is a parent, subsidiary, controls, is
`28.
`controlled by, has common control with, and/or is otherwise an affiliate of Cloanto Italia srl.
`Pursuant to the “Non-Aggression” clause in Paragraph 2 of the Settlement
`29.
`Agreement, Hyperion is permitted to challenge “the use and/or ownership of any Amiga Mark (other
`than an Exclusive Licensed Mark) by any Amiga Party or any licensee or successor to any Amiga
`
`
`2 Section 15 states that any potential buyer of an asset subject to the agreement “must execute an agreement
`substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 3 at or prior to the time it completes or closes that acquisition
`or purchase.” (emphasis in original)
`3 Exhibit 1 at p. 46.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 6
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 8 of 26
`
`
`
`Party” when “the challenged activity constitutes a material breach of [the Settlement Agreement],
`including but not limited to any material infringement by the Amiga Parties, by a successor to any
`Amiga Party, by a Purchaser or by a licensee of the licenses granted to Hyperion pursuant to this
`Agreement.” Id. at p. 33.
`Plaintiff’s business
`B.
`Plaintiff is a privately held Belgian company, founded on 25 February, 1999, and
`30.
`was previously known as Hyperion Entertainment VOF (the named Defendant in the Prior
`Washington Action).
`Plaintiff specializes inter alia in 3D graphics and 3D driver development, firmware
`31.
`development for embedded systems, IT consulting and the conversion of high quality entertainment
`software from Windows to niche platforms including Amiga, Linux and MacOS and thus develops
`entertainment software for the Linux, MacOS and AmigaOS operating systems.
`Since well before entering into the Settlement Agreement in 2009, Plaintiff has been
`32.
`actively developing AmigaOS 4.x, an almost complete rewrite for modern times of the legendary
`Amiga operating system which exhibits a nearly complete backward compatibility with the
`Software.
`AmigaOS 4.x runs on several PowerPC based hardware platforms including original
`33.
`Amigas with PowerPC accelerator cards and the stand-alone AmigaOne, SAM, Pegasos II
`platforms as well as the AmigaOne X5000.
`Lapse of the Amiga Registration and filing by Defendant Cloanto
`C.
`Of the original Amiga Parties, on information and belief, both Defendants Amiga
`34.
`and Amino have been administratively dissolved, terminated, or no longer have good standing in
`their respective jurisdictions of formation, but Itec remains in good standing.
`Plaintiff has no knowledge as to whether Defendants Amiga or Amino have the
`35.
`capacity to be reinstituted, or as to the disposition of any assets formerly owned by Defendants
`Amiga or Amino. Defendant Amiga was the listed owner of, inter alia, U.S. Trademark Registration
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 7
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 9 of 26
`
`
`
`No. 1,401,045 (“the ’045 Registration”), registered July 15, 1986, for the mark AMIGA in
`connection with: “Computers, computer disk drives, ram expansion cartridges, computer monitors,
`and computer modems” in class 9.
`The ’045 Registration was renewed for additional 10-year terms in 1996 and 2006,
`36.
`but it was not renewed in 2016, and the 6-month grace period for renewal expired on December 15,
`2016.
`
`Because the ’045 Registration was the sole remaining registration for an AMIGA-
`37.
`formative mark owned by Amiga in the United States, its lapse created a void that was quickly
`filled.
`
`On January 2, 2017, Defendant Cloanto filed U.S. Application Ser. No. 87/287,078
`38.
`(“the Cloanto Application”) for the mark AMIGA in connection with:
`Computer game programs; Computer game software downloadable from a global
`computer network; Computer hardware; Computer hardware and computer
`peripherals; Computer operating programs; Computer operating software;
`Computer operating systems; Computer programs for video and computer games;
`Computer software for emulating computer hardware, emulating computer
`operating systems on personal computers and mobile devices and instructional user
`guides sold as a unit; Computer software for emulating computer hardware,
`emulating computer operating systems on personal computers and mobile devices
`that may be downloaded from a global computer network; Computer software for
`emulating computer hardware, emulating computer operating systems on personal
`computers and mobile devices; Computer software platforms for emulating
`computer hardware and computer operating systems; Computer software, namely,
`game engine software for video game development and operation; Computer
`software for emulating computer hardware and computer operating systems that
`may be downloaded from a global computer network; Digital media, namely, pre-
`recorded video cassettes, digital video discs, digital versatile discs, downloadable
`audio and video recordings, DVDs, and high definition digital discs featuring
`software, games, music, videos, text, ebooks; Downloadable computer game
`software via a global computer network and wireless devices in Class 9.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S TRADEMARK FILINGS
`
`D.
`
`Recognizing that Plaintiff’s rights to the Exclusively Licensed Marks had been
`39.
`materially compromised by the lapse of the ’045 Registration and would be even further prejudiced
`by potential registration of the Cloanto Application unchallenged, Plaintiff made several trademark
`filings on February 8, 2017, to preserve its rights, including:
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 8
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 10 of 26
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Ser. No. 87/329,448 for AmigaOne, in
`connection with:
`Computer hardware; computers; Central processing units (CPU);
`motherboards, in Class 9; and
`
`Promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websites of others
`in the field of computer hardware and software; Providing on-line
`web directory services featuring hyperlinks to the websites of others,
`in Class 35.
`U.S. Trademark Application Ser. No. 87/329,431 for AmigaOS, in
`connection with:
`Computer operating programs and computer operating systems;
`Software development kits (SDK); Computer software development
`tools, in Class 9; and
`
`featuring computer software;
`On-line retail store services
`Promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websites of others
`in the field of computer hardware and software; Providing on-line
`web directory services featuring hyperlinks to the websites of others,
`in Class 35.
`
`U.S. Trademark Application Ser. No. 87/329,469, for the “Boing
`Ball logo” (depicted below) in connection with:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`
`
`
`
`Computer operating programs and computer operating systems; Software
`development kits (SDK); Computer software development tools; Computer
`hardware; computers; Central processing units (CPU); motherboards, in
`Class 9; and
`On-line retail store services featuring computer software; Promotion,
`advertising and marketing of on-line websites of others in the field of
`computer hardware and software; Providing on-line web directory services
`featuring hyperlinks to the websites of others, in Class 35.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 9
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 11 of 26
`
`
`
`E.
`
`Plaintiff’s communications with the Amiga Parties
`On or about March 2, 2017, Plaintiff also contacted the last known officer of Amiga
`40.
`and Amino, former CEO Mr. Bill McEwen in hopes of resolving its concerns about the lapse of the
`’045 Registration and the filing of the Cloanto Application. Mr. McEwen represented that he was
`in contact with the shareholders of Amiga and would relay Plaintiff’s concerns and proposed
`resolution.
`On March 31, 2017, having not resolved its concerns, Plaintiff sent a letter to
`41.
`Defendant Itec.
`As part of an exchange of communications between Plaintiff and Itec that followed,
`42.
`Plaintiff expressly inquired in a letter dated April 17, 2017 (“the April 17 letter”), whether “the
`Amiga Parties has granted, under the terms of its license to Cloanto or otherwise, any rights or
`authorizations to Cloanto to file for a U.S. trademark application for AMIGA in Cloanto’s name.”
`The April 17 letter further advised that in the absence of such authority, Cloanto’s attempt to register
`was an infringement of the AMIGA mark, and that the April 17 letter served as notice of such
`infringement.
`As part of the exchange of communications between Plaintiff and Itec, Itec orally
`43.
`represented to Plaintiff that Amiga was still a going concern, which representation was documented
`in the April 17 letter and not subsequently contradicted by Itec.
`Despite Plaintiff’s express request in the April 17 letter that Itec provide a chain of
`44.
`title for the disposition of the Exclusive Licensed Marks and “[a] copy of Exhibit 3 as executed by
`each and every current owner of the Licensed Marks, the Amiga Mark, and/or the Collateral, if not
`one of the Amiga Parties already a signatory to the Settlement Agreement,” Plaintiff received no
`response from Defendant Itec to this request.
`Plaintiff also informed Itec via the April 17 letter that it considered the failure to
`45.
`renew the AMIGA registrations in the U.S. to be a material breach of the Settlement Agreement.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 10
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 12 of 26
`
`
`
`F.
`
`Oppositions filed against the Cloanto Application
`The Cloanto Application was published for opposition on May 9, 2017.
`46.
`47.
`Having not received a response from Defendant Itec to its April 17 letter, Plaintiff
`sent Itec a communication on May 9, 2017, serving “notice to Itec and Amiga that Cloanto’s
`application to register AMIGA was published for opposition on May 11, 2017, and failure to file a
`Notice of Opposition or Extension of Time to file a Notice of Opposition before the end of the 30-
`day opposition period will only further prejudice Hyperion’s rights.”
`Itec and Plaintiff both timely filed for 90-day Extensions of Time to Oppose the
`48.
`Cloanto Application and subsequently filed for additional 60-day Extensions of Time to Oppose,
`with the consent of Cloanto.
`Itec commenced Opposition No. 91237599 (“the Itec Opposition”) with the United
`49.
`States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) on
`November 6, 2017, by filing a Notice of Opposition alleging as grounds for the opposition that Itec
`“is the majority shareholder in Amiga, Inc. (“Amiga”), the owner of the famous trademark AMIGA
`for computers, software, and related products” that as such, it is “directly affected by any actions
`which may adversely impact the business operations of Amiga and Amiga’s assets, including the
`famous trademark and trade name AMIGA.”
`Notably absent from Itec’s Notice of Opposition was any allegation that Itec is the
`50.
`owner of the AMIGA trademark and any explanation as to why Amiga, Inc. did not file for the
`extensions of time and the opposition in its own name.
`Having received no answers from Itec to Plaintiff’s inquiries regarding current
`51.
`ownership of the Amiga IP, and therefore not confident Itec would ultimately be able to demonstrate
`standing to oppose, Plaintiff Hyperion timely filed Opposition No. 91237628 (“Hyperion’s
`Opposition”) with the USPTO TTAB on November 6, 2017, to preserve rights.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
`AND BREACH OF CONTRACT - 11
`CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381
`
`LEE & HAYES, PLLC
`601 West Riverside Ave., Suite 1400
`Spokane, Washington 99201
`Telephone: (509) 324-9256 Fax: (509) 323-8979
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-00381-RSM Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 13 of 26
`
`
`
`On Nov

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket