`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`al
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: September 1, 2017
`
`Opposition No. 91232896
`
`Boy Scouts of America
`
`
`v.
`
`CCG Creative, LLC
`
`
`
`By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`
`
`On June 1, 2017, the Board allowed Applicant time to file an amended
`
`answer that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b). On June 27, 2017, Applicant filed its
`
`amended answer.
`
` This case now comes up for consideration of Opposer’s motion (filed July 13,
`
`2017) to strike Applicant’s amended answer and for entry of default judgment. In
`
`the alternative, Opposer moves to deem admitted all the unanswered allegations in
`
`the amended answer. On July 13, 2017, Applicant filed a brief in response and
`
`another amended answer to the notice of opposition. Opposer filed its brief in reply
`
`on July 28, 2017 which the Board has considered. Applicant’s July 30, 2017 filing is
`
`a surreply and will not be considered. See Trademark Rule 2.127(a).
`
`
`
`In support of its motion, Opposer argues that Applicant “has failed
`
`repeatedly to file a timely, rule-compliant answer to Opposer’s Notice of
`
`Opposition…despite the Board’s clear and succinct instructions on how to do so.”
`
`
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232896
`
`
`
`To the extent Applicant’s July 13, 2017 version of its answer is its most
`
`recent and is the only version of Applicant’s answer that actually answers all 38
`
`paragraphs of the notice of opposition, the Board exercises its discretion in the
`
`interest of judicial efficiency and will consider the motion with respect to this
`
`version of the answer only.1 Opposer’s motion to strike the June 27, 2017 answer is
`
`moot.
`
`In considering whether to strike the July 13, 2017 answer and enter default
`
`judgment against Applicant, the standard is the Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) standard, i.e.,
`
`whether the defendant has shown good cause why default judgment should not be
`
`entered against it. As a general rule, good cause will be found where the defendant’s
`
`delay has not been willful or in bad faith, when prejudice to the plaintiff is lacking,
`
`and where defendant has a meritorious defense. See Fred Hayman Beverly Hills,
`
`Inc. v. Jacques Bernier Inc., 21 USPQ2d 1556 (TTAB 1991). The determination of
`
`whether default judgment should be entered against a party lies within the Board’s
`
`sound discretion. In exercising that discretion, the Board is mindful of its policy to
`
`decide cases on their merits where possible and therefore only reluctantly enters
`
`judgment by default for failure to timely answer. See TBMP Section 312.02.
`
`Inasmuch as it appears that Applicant’s failure to timely file an answer was
`
`caused by its apparent confusion on how to properly answer the notice of opposition
`
`and because it has now managed to answer all 38 paragraphs of the notice of
`
`opposition, the Board finds that Applicant has shown good cause why default
`
`judgment should not be entered against it. In particular, Applicant’s failure to
`
`1 Opposer addresses this version of the answer in its reply brief.
`
` 2
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232896
`
`answer in a timely manner was neither willful nor in bad faith. Further, there is no
`
`evidence of any prejudice to Opposer and Applicant has set forth a meritorious
`
`defense by now setting forth a plausible response to the allegations in the
`
`complaint.
`
`In view thereof, Opposer’s motion to strike and enter default judgment
`
`against Applicant is hereby denied.2 With regard to the alternative motion to deem
`
` admitted all the unanswered allegations in the amended answer, to the extent the
`
`July 13, 2017 answer now provides responses for each paragraph of the complaint
`
`such motion is denied.
`
`
`
`Nevertheless, the Board notes that the July 13, 2017 answer fails to include a
`
`description of the capacity in which the signing individual signs, e.g., attorney for
`
`defendant, officer of defendant identified by title, partner of defendant. See TBMP
`
`Section 311.01(b). Therefore, Applicant has 10 days from the mailing date set forth
`
`in the caption of this order to identify the capacity in which the individual who
`
`signed the July 13, 2017 answer signs.
`
`The Board deems the filing of Opposer’s motion to have tolled the running of
`
`all dates herein. Dates are reset as follows:
`
`9/27/2017
`9/27/2017
`10/27/2017
`
`Deadline for Discovery Conference
`Discovery Opens
`Initial Disclosures Due
`
`2 The Board observes that the July 13, 2017 answer includes admissions, denials, and
`statements that Applicant does not have sufficient information to admit or deny certain
`allegations (which have the effect of denials as to those particular allegations). See TBMP
`Section 311.02(a). Such answer also includes amplifications (“arguments”) that will not be
`stricken because they are permitted to the extent they give Opposer fuller notice of the
`position which Applicant plans to take in defense of its right to registration. See TBMP
`Section 311.02(d).
`
`
`
` 3
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232896
`
`
`Expert Disclosures Due
`Discovery Closes
`Plaintiff's Pretrial Disclosures Due
`Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends
`Defendant's Pretrial Disclosures Due
`Defendant's 30-day Trial Period Ends
`Plaintiff's Rebuttal Disclosures Due
`Plaintiff's 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends
`
`2/24/2018
`3/26/2018
`5/10/2018
`6/24/2018
`7/9/2018
`8/23/2018
`9/7/2018
`10/7/2018
`
`
`
`In each instance, a copy of the transcript of testimony together with copies of
`
`documentary exhibits, must be served on the adverse party within thirty days after
`
`completion of the taking of testimony. Trademark Rule 2.l25.
`
`
`
`Briefs shall be filed in accordance with Trademark Rule 2.128(a) and (b). An
`
`oral hearing will be set only upon request filed as provided by Trademark Rule
`
`2.l29.
`
`
`
`
`
`* * *
`
`NOTICE: CHANGES TO THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`(“BOARD”) RULES OF PRACTICE WILL BE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 14, 2017.
`The USPTO published a Notice of Final Rulemaking in the Federal Register on
`October 7 2016, at 81 F.R. 69950. It sets forth several amendments to the rules
`that govern inter partes (oppositions, cancellations, concurrent use) and ex parte
`appeal proceedings.
`For complete information, the parties are referred to:
`• The Board’s home page on the uspto.gov website:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/trademark-trial-and-
`appeal-board-ttab
`• The final rule:
`http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/81%20FR%2069950.pdf
`• A chart summarizing the affected rules and changes:
`http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/RulesChart_01_14_17.pdf
`
`
`For all proceedings, including those already in progress on January 14, 2017,
`some of the changes are:
`
` 4
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232896
`
`
`• All pleadings and submissions must be filed through ESTTA. Trademark
`Rules 2.101, 2.102, 2.106, 2.111, 2.114, 2.121, 2.123, 2.126, 2.190 and 2.191.
`• Service of all papers must be by email, unless otherwise stipulated.
`Trademark Rule 2.119.
`• Response periods are no longer extended by five days for service by mail.
`Trademark Rule 2.119.
`• Deadlines for submissions to the Board that are initiated by a date of service
`are 20 days. Trademark Rule 2.119. Responses to motions for summary
`judgment remain 30 days. Similarly, deadlines for responses to discovery
`requests remain 30 days.
`• All discovery requests must be served early enough to allow for responses
`prior to the close of discovery. Trademark Rule 2.120. Duty to supplement
`discovery responses will continue after the close of discovery.
`• Motions to compel initial disclosures must be filed within 30 days after the
`deadline for serving initial disclosures. Trademark Rule 2.120.
`• Motions to compel discovery, motions to test the sufficiency of responses or
`objections, and motions for summary judgment must be filed prior to the first
`pretrial disclosure deadline. Trademark Rules 2.120 and 2.127.
`• Requests for production and requests for admission, as well as
`interrogatories, are each limited to 75. Trademark Rule 2.120.
`• Testimony may be submitted in the form of an affidavit or declaration.
`Trademark Rules 2.121, 2.123 and 2.125
`• New requirements for the submission of trial evidence and deposition
`transcripts. Trademark Rules 2.122, 2.123, and 2.125.
`
`• For proceedings filed on or after January 14, 2017, in addition to the
`changes set forth above, the Board’s notice of institution constitutes service of
`complaints. Trademark Rules 2.101 and 2.111.
`
`This is only a summary of the significant content of the Final Rule. All parties
`involved in or contemplating filing a Board proceeding, regardless of the date of
`commencement of the proceeding, should read the entire Final Rule.
`
`
`
`
` 5
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket