`ESTTA764090
`08/12/2016
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`ARD Champs, Inc.
`
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`09/14/2016
`
`12313 Greco Drive
`Orlando, FL 32824
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`Allison R. Imber, Esq.
`Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.
`255 South Orange AvenueSuite 1401
`Orlando, FL 32801
`UNITED STATES
`aimber@addmg.com Phone:407.841.2330
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`86787191
`
`Publication date
`
`05/17/2016
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`08/12/2016
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`09/14/2016
`
`2Fit Your Fitness Partner Inc
`1751 85th ST APT 4A
`Brooklyn, NY 11214
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 025. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Athletic tops and bottoms for running; Ath-
`letic clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, and pants; Clothing for horseriding, namely, pants and jackets;
`Clothing for wear in judo practices; Clothing made ofleather, namely, skirts, pants, jacketsand belts;
`Evening gowns; Gloves for cyclists; Gowns; Gym shorts; Gymwear, namely, shirts, shorts and pants;
`Ankle warmers; Evening wear, namely, dresses, coats and scarves; Gloves; Judo suits; Riding
`gloves; Riding jackets; Riding trousers; Shorts; Sports caps and hats; Sportswear, namely, shirts,
`shorts and pants; Sweat bands; Sweat bottoms; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat
`suits;Sweatabsorbent underclothing; Teeshirts
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`86847214
`
`Publication date
`
`05/24/2016
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`08/12/2016
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`2Fit Your Fitness Partner Inc
`1751 85th ST APT 4A
`Brooklyn, NY 11214
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 025. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Athletic tops and bottoms for running; Ath-
`letic clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, and pants; Clothing for horseriding, namely, pants and jackets;
`Clothing for wear in judo practices; Clothing made ofleather, namely, skirts, pants, jacketsand belts;
`Evening gowns; Gloves for cyclists; Gowns; Gym shorts; Gymwear, namely, shirts, shorts and pants;
`Ankle warmers; Evening wear, namely, dresses, coats and scarves; Gloves; Judo suits; Riding
`gloves; Riding jackets; Riding trousers; Shorts; Sports caps and hats; Sportswear, namely, shirts,
`shorts and pants; Sweat bands; Sweat bottoms; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat
`suits;Sweatabsorbent underclothing; Teeshirts
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Fraud on the USPTO
`
`In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d
`1938 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
`
`Marks Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application/ Registra-
`tion No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`Word Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`U.S. Application/ Registra-
`tion No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`Word Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`2FIT
`
`a variety of clothing and sports and fitness equipment
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`4FIT
`
`a variety of clothing and sports and fitness equipment
`
`U.S. Application/ Registra-
`tion No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`
`
`Design Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`a variety of clothing and sports and fitness equipment
`
`U.S. Application/ Registra-
`tion No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`
`
`Design Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`a variety of clothing and sports and fitness equipment
`
`Attachments
`
`2FIT drawing.jpg
`4FIT drawing.jpg
`opp.pdf(55506 bytes )
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Signature
`
`/Christina Jensen/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Christina Jensen
`
`08/12/2016
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the Matter of Trademark Application Serial Nos. 86/787191 and 86/847214
`For the Marks 2FIT YOUR FITNESS PARTNER & Design and
`4FIT FOR BEING SHAPED & Design, respectively
`Published in the Official Gazette on May 17th and 24th, 2016, respectively
`
`ARD Champs, Inc.,
`
`Opposers,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`2Fit Your Fitness Partner Inc.,
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`ARD Champs, Inc. (“Opposer”), a Florida corporation with an address at 12313 Greco
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drive, Orlando, Florida 32824, believes that it will be damaged by the registration of the marks
`
` and
`
` (collectively, “Applicant’s Marks”) as shown in U.S. Trademark
`
`Application Serial Nos. 86/787191 and 86/847214, respectively, (collectively, the “Subject
`
`Applications”), and specified for use in connection with a variety of clothing items in
`
`International Class 25, as published in the Official Gazette on May 17th and 24th, 2016,
`
`respectively, and hereby opposes same.
`
`The grounds for this Opposition are as follows:
`
`1
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Opposer is the owner of the marks 2FIT, 4FIT,
`
` and
`
` (collectively, “Opposer’s Marks”), which it has used
`
`in connection with a variety of clothing and sports and fitness equipment (collectively,
`
`“Opposer’s Goods”) since at least as early as 2012 through its predecessor-in-interest, Mr. Amer
`
`Ayub.
`
`2.
`
`Opposer has extensively promoted and continuously used its marks throughout
`
`the United States, and has had significant commercial success in connection with the variety of
`
`clothing and sports and fitness equipment offered under its Marks. As a result, Opposer’s Marks
`
`have developed valuable goodwill within the relevant trade and industry, and Opposer enjoys
`
`nationwide trademark rights in its Marks.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer’s Marks are inherently distinctive and are valuable assets of Opposer.
`
`Prior to filing the Subject Applications, Applicant 2Fit Your Fitness Partner Inc.
`
`(“Applicant”) purchased Opposer’s Goods for re-sale, and was otherwise aware that Opposer is
`
`the owner of Opposer’s Marks.
`
`2
`
`
`
`5.
`
`In an attempt to usurp Opposer’s trademark rights in its Marks, Applicant now
`
`seeks to register the marks
`
` and
`
` as shown in U.S. Trademark
`
`Application Serial No. 86/787191 and 86/847214, respectively, both specified for use in
`
`connection with “athletic tops and bottoms for running; athletic clothing, namely, shirts, shorts,
`
`and pants; clothing for horseriding, namely, pants and jackets; clothing for wear in judo
`
`practices; clothing made of leather, namely, skirts, pants, jackets and belts; evening gowns;
`
`gloves for cyclists; gowns; gym shorts; gymwear, namely, shirts, shorts and pants; ankle
`
`warmers; evening wear, namely, dresses, coats and scarves; gloves; judo suits; riding gloves;
`
`riding jackets; riding trousers; shorts; sports caps and hats; sportswear, namely, shirts, shorts and
`
`pants; sweat bands; sweat bottoms; sweat pants; sweat shirts; sweat shorts; sweat suits;
`
`sweatabsorbent underclothing; teeshirts” in International Class 25 (collectively, the “Opposer’s
`
`Goods”).
`
`6.
`
`Applicant filed U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 86/787191 on October 14,
`
`2015 and filed U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 86/847214 on December 12, 2015, both
`
`on the basis of Applicant’s intent to use the marks in commerce. Upon information and belief,
`
`Applicant has not yet begun to use its Marks in U.S. commerce.
`
`7.
`
`The Subject Applications contained the following representations made by Nadia
`
`Najum, the President of Applicant, which were made under penalty of perjury (emphasis added):
`
`The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made
`are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, and that
`such willful false statements, and the like, may jeopardize the validity of the application
`or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this
`application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the
`trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under
`15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in
`commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation,
`
`3
`
`
`
`or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form
`thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in
`connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause
`mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true;
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`8.
`
`On June 24, 2016, Opposer wrote to Applicant demanding that it cease using
`
`Applicant’s Marks and abandon the Subject Applications. Applicant refused, necessitating the
`
`instant opposition.
`
`COUNT I: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`9.
`
`The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-8 above are incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`
`10.
`
`Opposer used its Marks in commerce prior the filing date of the Subject
`
`Applications and before Applicant’s first use of Applicant’s Marks in connection with any of the
`
`Opposer’s Goods within the United States.
`
`11.
`
`Applicant’s Marks are confusingly and deceptively similar to Opposer’s Marks.
`
`Applicant’s Marks are very similar if not identical in sight, sound, connotation, and commercial
`
`impression to Opposer’s Marks. Applicant has copied the designs of Opposer’s Marks in an
`
`attempt to usurp the goodwill therein.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant’s Goods are very similar if not identical to Opposer’s Goods.
`
`13.
`
`The channels of trade and class of purchasers for Applicant’s Goods will be very
`
`similar or identical to those of Opposer’s Goods if and when Applicant begins making sales of its
`
`Goods.
`
`14. Due to the similarity between Applicant’s Marks and its Goods, as well as
`
`Opposer’s Marks and its Goods, not to mention the likely similarity of the respective channels of
`
`trade and classes of purchasers, the registration of Applicant’s Marks will cause great damage
`
`4
`
`
`
`and injury to Opposer. Persons familiar with Opposer’s Marks and Goods would likely confuse
`
`Applicant’s Goods with those provided by Opposer. Any defect, objection or fault found with
`
`Applicant’s Goods offered under its Mark may reflect upon and expose Opposer to liability, and
`
`seriously injure the reputation that Opposer has established for its Goods.
`
`15.
`
`Applicant has admitted that there is a likelihood of confusion between its Marks
`
`and Opposer’s Marks by swearing under penalty of perjury in an eBay.com declaration that
`
`Opposer’s Marks infringed its alleged trademark rights and certain of Opposer’s Goods should
`
`be removed from eBay.com as a result.
`
`16.
`
`If Applicant is granted the registrations herein opposed, it would obtain at least a
`
`prima facie exclusive right to use its Marks in the United States, thereby causing damage and
`
`injury to Opposer.
`
`COUNT II: FRAUD
`
`17.
`
`The allegations contained in paragraphs 1-8 above are incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`
`18.
`
`Applicant’s representations that it was the owner of its Marks and that no other
`
`person, firm, corporation or association had the right to use the mark in commerce were false
`
`statements made knowingly with the intent to mislead the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office into approving the Subject Applications for publication.
`
`19.
`
`At the time Applicant filed the Subject Applications, Applicant was aware of
`
`Opposer’s trademark rights in Opposer’s Marks and knew that it was wrongfully attempting to
`
`federally register Opposer’s Marks in an attempt to usurp Opposer’s trademark rights therein.
`
`20.
`
`The above-referenced knowingly false representations were material to the
`
`registration of Opposer’s Marks. The Subject Applications would not have been approved for
`
`5
`
`
`
`publication without these representations being made, and they therefore constitute fraud on the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`21.
`
`If Applicant is granted the registrations herein opposed, it would obtain at least a
`
`prima facie exclusive right to use its Marks in the United States, thereby causing damage and
`
`injury to Opposer.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that this Opposition be sustained and U.S. Trademark
`
`Application Serial Nos. 86/787191 and 86/847214 be rejected, and that Opposer be granted such
`
`additional relief as the Board deems just and proper.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Allison R. Imber/
`Allison R. Imber, Esq.
`Jaafar Choufani, Esq.
`Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.
`255 South Orange Avenue
`Suite 1401
`Orlando, Florida 32801
`Phone (407) 841-2330
`Fax (407) 841-2343
`Email: aimber@addmg.com
`
`jchoufani@addmg.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`ARD Champs, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 12, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by U S.
`
`Mail, postage prepaid, on August 12, 2016, to:
`
`Nadia Najum
`2Fit Your Fitness Partner Inc.
`1751 85th St., Apt 4A
`Brooklyn, NY 11214-2931
`
`
`
`
`/Christina Jensen/
`
` Christina Jensen, Legal Assistant
`
`
`
`
`
`7