throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA649620
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`01/13/2015
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91220073
`Plaintiff
`Milk Studios, LLC
`Defendant
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`No
`
`Proceeding.
`Applicant
`
`Other Party
`
`Have the parties
`held their discov-
`ery conference
`as required under
`Trademark Rules
`2.120(a)(1) and
`(a)(2)?
`
`Motion for Suspension in View of Civil Proceeding With Consent
`
`The parties are engaged in a civil action which may have a bearing on this proceeding. Accordingly, Milk Stu-
`dios, LLC hereby requests suspension of this proceeding pending a final determination of the civil action.
`Trademark Rule 2.117.
`Milk Studios, LLC has secured the express consent of all other parties to this proceeding for the suspension
`and resetting of dates requested herein.
`Milk Studios, LLC has provided an e-mail address herewith for itself and for the opposing party so that any or-
`der on this motion may be issued electronically by the Board.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`Respectfully submitted,
`/JHD/
`James H. Donoian
`jdonoian@mccarter.com, hlewin@mccarter.com, lsawaya@mccarter.com, dlynch@mccarter.com
`trademarksf@leclairryan.com
`01/13/2015
`
`

`
`14
`CV
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`5%
`
`MILK STUDIOS, LLC,
`
`X CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.;
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1,
`
`Plaintiff Milk Studios, LLC states that it
`
`does not have a parent corporation, and that no publicly
`
`held corporation owns 10% or more of
`
`its stock.
`
`Dated: New York, NY
`
`November 24, 2014
`
`MEI 193I434lv.l
`
`
`
`McCarter-& English
`245 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10167
`Tel.: (212) 609-6800
`Fax: (212) 609-6921
`h1ewin@mccarter.c0m
`jdonoian@mccarter.com
`
`Lee Carl Bromberg
`Lori J. Shyavitz
`McCarter & English, LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`Tel.: (617)449-6500
`Fax: (617) 607-9200
`1bromberg@mccarter.com
`1shyavitz@mccarter.com
`
`

`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`MILK STUDIOS, LLC,
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`I
`
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`V.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD;
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`
`Defendants.
`
`does not have a parent corporation, and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of
`
`its stock.
`
`Dated: New York, NY
`
`November 24, 2014
`
`McCarter»& English
`245 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10167
`Tel; (212) 609-6800
`Fax: (212) 609-6921
`hlewin@mccarter.com
`jdonoian@mccarter.com
`
`Lee Carl Bromberg
`Lori J. Shyavitz
`McCarter & English, LLP
`265 Franklin Street
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`Tel: (617) 449-6500
`Fax: (617) 607-9200
`lbromberg@mccarter.corn
`1shyavitz@rnccarter.com
`
`MEI l931434lv.l
`
`

`
`JS 44C/SDNY
`REV. 4/2014
`
`PLAINTIFFS
`Milk Studios, LLC
`
`P!
`
`(S.
`
`The JS-4 e§IIfi;I’
`.
`.
`I
`
`CIVIL COVER SHEET
`
`
`i
`f matron contained herein neither replace nor supplement the
`‘g'I'
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`pleadings or other papers as r
`law, except as provided by local rules of Court. This form, approved by the
`e
`e
`Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of
`initiating the civil docket sheet.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung
`Telecommunications America, LLC.
`
`ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER
`Mccarter & English, LLP, 245 Park Avenue, 27th Fl.
`New York, NY 10167; (212)609-6800
`
`ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
`Unknown
`
`CAUSE OF ACTION(CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSB
`(DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
`
`15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1)(a), 1‘I25(a), 1125(0) trademark infringement, dilution, false designation of origin and unfair Competition
`
`Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the Same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? NeSI:IJudge Previously Assigned
`
`If yes, was this Case VOLEI lnvol. [:] Dismissed. No D Yes [I Ifyes, give date
`
`& Case No.
`
`Is THIS AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION cAsE7
`
`No E]
`
`Yes
`
`I:]
`
`(PLACEAN[X] IN ONEBOXONLY}
`TORTS
`
`NATURE OF SUIT
`
`ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES
`
`CONTRACT
`
`PERSONAL INJURY
`
`PERSONAL INJURY
`I I357 HEALTHCAREI
`
`FORFEITUREIPENALTY
`
`BANKRUPTCY
`
`:°NI-I/L‘«JRIxI:<;|E$JDT[IJ<3CA_L PERSONAL I 1525 DRUG RELATED
`R
`LIABILITY
`I
`I 365 PERSONAL INJURY
`SEIZUSEUEE EEIOPERTY
`PRODUCT LIABILITY
`1 690 OTHER
`I I368 ASBESTOS PERSONAL
`INJURY PRODUCT
`LIABILITY
`
`I
`
`PERSONAL PROPERTY
`
`I
`I
`
`I 370 OTHER FRAUD
`I 371 TRUTH IN LENDING
`
`[ I422 APPEAL
`28 USC 158
`[ I423 WITHDRAWAL
`28 USC 157
`
`PROPERTY RIGHTS
`
`I 820 COPYRIGHTS
`[
`] 830 PATENT
`[
`Dd 840 TRADEMARK
`
`SOCIAL SECURITY
`
`I
`I 110
`I I120
`I
`I 130
`I
`I 140
`I
`I 150
`
`INSURANCE
`MARINE
`MILLER ACT
`NEGOTIABLE
`INSTRUMENT
`RECOVERY OF
`OVERPAYMENT &
`ENFORCEMENT
`OF JUDGMENT
`MEDICARE ACT
`RECOVERY OF
`DEFAULTED
`STUDENT LOANS
`(EXCL VETERANS)
`RECOVERY OF
`OVERPAYMENT
`OF VETERAN'S
`BENEFITS
`STOCKHOLDERS
`SUITS
`OTHER
`CONTRACT
`CONTRACT
`PRODUCT
`LIABILITY
`I I196 FRANCHISE
`
`I I151
`I
`I 152
`
`I I153
`
`I 160
`I
`I 190
`I
`I 1195
`
`I
`I
`
`[.1310 AIRPLANE
`I I315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT
`LIABILITY
`I 320 ASSAULT, LIBEL &
`SLANDER
`I 330 FEDERAL
`EMPLOYERS‘
`LIABILITY
`I I340 MARINE
`I
`I 345 MARINE PRODUCT
`LIABILITY
`I I350 MOTOR VEHICLE
`I I355 MOTOR VEHICLE
`PRODUCT LIABILITY
`I
`I 360 OTHER PERSONAL
`INJURY
`I
`I 362 PERSONAL INJURY -
`MED MALPRACTICE
`
`AcTIoNs UNDER STATUTES
`CIVIL RIGHTS
`
`I
`
`I I360 OTHER PERSONAL
`PROPERTY DAMAGE
`I 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE
`PRODUCT LIABILITY
`PRISONER PETITIONS
`I
`I 463 ALIEN DETAINEE
`I I510 MOTIONS TO
`VACATE SENTENCE
`23 USC 2255
`I I530 HABEAS CORPUS
`I I535 DEATH PENALTY
`
`LABOR
`
`I I710 FAIR LABOR
`STANDARDS ACT
`I I720 LABOR/MGMT
`RELATIONS
`I I740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT
`
`A\7,?AFC/I‘TI"(',:L,j,LNA'§D'CAL
`I I790 OTHER LABOR
`LITIGATION
`
`I ]861 HIA(1395ff)
`I
`I 862 BLACK LUNG (923)
`I I663 DIWC/DlWW(405(g))
`I
`I 864 SSID TITLE XVI
`I 1865 RSI (405(g))
`
`FEDERAL TAX SUITS
`
`I ]870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or
`Defendant)
`[ I871 lRS—THIRD PARTY
`26 USC 7609
`
`REAL PROPERTY
`I
`I 210
`LAND
`CONDEMNATION
`I I220
`FORECLOSURE
`I I230
`RENT LEASE 8.
`EJECTMENT
`TORTS TO LAND
`I I240
`TORT PRODUCT
`I I245
`LIABILITY
`ALL OTHER
`REAL PROPERTY
`
`I I290
`
`I H40 OTHERICML RIGHTS I
`IN°”‘P”‘°"e'I
`I I441 VOTING
`I 442 EMPLOYMENT
`I
`I 1443 HOUSING!
`ACCOMMODATIONS
`I I445 AMERICANS WITH
`DISABILITIES -
`EMPLOYMENT
`[ I446 AMERICANS WITH
`DISABILITIES -OTHER
`[ ]448 EDUCATION
`
`I 540 MANDAMUS 3. OTHER
`
`I I791 EIQEESEEINECT
`IMMIGRATION
`
`PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS
`I I462 NATURALIZATION
`APPLICATION
`I I550 CIVIL RIGHTS
`I 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION
`I
`I I555 PRISON CONDITION
`ACTIONS
`I 560 CIVIL DETAINEE
`CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
`
`OTHER sTATuTEs
`400 STATE
`I I 375 FALSE CLAIMS
`REAPPORTIONMENT
`I I410 ANTITRUST
`I I430 BANKS & BANKING
`I I450 COMMERCE
`I 1460 DEPORTATION
`I I470 RACKETEER INFLU-
`ENCED & CORRUPT
`ORGANIZATION ACT
`(RICO)
`I I450 CONSUMER CREDIT
`I I490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV
`[
`] B50 SECURITIESI
`COMMODITIES}
`EXCHANGE
`
`I
`
`] 890 OTHER STATUTORY
`ACTIONS
`[ I891 AGRICULTURAL ACTS
`
`[
`
`] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL
`MATTERS
`[ ]895 FREEDOM OF
`INFORMATION ACT
`I
`I 896 ARBITRATION
`I
`I 699 ADMINISTRATIVE
`PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR
`APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION
`
`[ ]95O CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
`STATE STATUTES
`
`THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y.?
`DOCKET NUMBER
`
`Check ifdemanded in complaint:
`
`CHECK IF THIS IS ACLASS ACTION
`UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
`
`D D
`
`EMAND $
`
`OTHER
`
`JUDGE
`
`Check YES only ifdemanded in com Iaint
`JURY DEMAND: YES
`0
`
`NOTE: You must also Submit at the time of filing the Statement of Relatedness form (Form IH-32).
`
`

`
`(PLACEAN x IN ONE BOX ONLY)
`
`OR|G|N
`
`1 Original
`Proceeding
`
`ET 2 Removed from
`State Com
`_
`. all partnes represented
`
`D a
`
`E] 3 Remanded D 4 Reinstated or D 5 Transferred from D 6 Multidistrict
`from
`Reopened
`(Specify District)
`Litigation
`Appellate
`Coufi
`
`E] 7 Appeal to District
`Judge from
`Magistrate Judge
`Judgment
`
`At least one
`party is pro se.
`(PLACE/‘IN X W ONE BOX ONLY)
`
`E]
`
`E] 1 u.s. PLAINTIFF
`
`[I2 u.s. DEFENDANT
`
`BASIS OF JURISDICTION
`
`3 FEDERAL QUESTION
`(us. NOT A PARTY)
`
`|'_‘I4 DIVERSITY
`
`IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE
`
`ClTIZEN$HIPBELOW-
`
`CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)
`
`(Place an [X] in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant)
`PTF
`DEF
`I
`I 1
`I
`I 1
`
`CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A
`FOREIGN COUNTRY
`
`CITIZEN OF THIS STATE
`
`PTF DEF
`I
`I 3 I 33
`
`INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE
`OF BUSINESS IN ANOTHER STATE
`
`CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE
`
`I I2
`
`I I2
`
`INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE
`OF BUSINESS IN THIS STATE
`
`I I4I I4
`
`FOREIGN NATION
`
`PLA|NT|FF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(|ES)
`Milk Studios, LLC
`450 West 15th Street
`
`New York, NY10011
`
`PTF DEF
`I
`I 5
`I I5
`
`I ]6
`
`I 16
`
`DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(|ES)
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 416 Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon city, GyeOnggi—do, Korea
`443-742
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc, 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, 1301 East Lockout Drive, Richardson, Texas 75082
`
`DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
`REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN
`RESIBENOE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
`
`N/A
`
`Check one:
`
`E] WHITE PLAINS
`THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO:
`(DO NOT check either box if this a PRISONER PETITION/PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS
`COMPLAINT.)
`
`MANHATTAN
`
`DATE 11/24/2014 SIGNATU OF ATTO
`
`RECEIPT #
`
`OF RECORD
`
`ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT
`[
`] NO
`A/‘)e:_
`Ix] YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo. Pfit
`Attorney Bar Code # 1«3vr9;J—o 1.3»;
`
`war
`Yr. 1970
`
`)
`
`Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court.
`MAG. JUDGE COW
`
`Magistrate Judge
`
`is so Designated.
`
`Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court by
`
`Deputy Clerk, DATED
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (NEW YORK SOUTHERN)
`
`

`
`_
`
`_
`
`. 7
`
`I
`MILK STUDIOS, LLC,
`
`_
`
`V.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO
`
`1 4
`Q CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`P1a‘““ff=
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.;
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff Milk Studios, LLC (“Plaintiff" or “Milk”), as and for its Complaint against
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
`
`Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung” or the “Defendants”) states as
`
`follows:
`
`THE NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`For more than 15' years, Plaintiff Milk built and continues today to build a
`
`multimedia and creative content business under the MILK trademark and tradename that serves as
`
`a contemporary culture think tank for innovation, promotion and collaboration with some of
`
`today’s most talented artists, celebrities, designers, fashion icons, and producers. Milk stands at
`
`the crossroads of the fashion, music, photography and film worlds. Through its leadership and
`
`melding of today’s culture and creativity, Milk has become the epicenter of expression for
`
`emerging artists and designers, world famous entertainers and musicians.
`
`2.
`
`With full knowledge of Milk’s well—known MILK brand and trademark rights,
`
`Samsung, a sometimes client of and collaborator with Milk, has recently rebranded its music
`
`streaming service and related mobile application under the name MILK,
`
`instituted a major
`
`MEI l9289060v.l
`
`

`
`marketing campaign to promote the service, and has now expanded its MILK platform to various
`
`other media, including video streaming and related mobile application,
`
`in blatant disregard of
`
`Plaintiff Milk’s rights (“collectively the “Infringing Media”)
`
`3.
`
`To protect
`
`its recognized rights in its MILK brand and trademark, after its
`
`objections to Samsung’s use of the term “milk” went nowhere with Samsung, Milk is compelled
`
`to bring this action against Defendants, seeking injunctive relief as well as damages for trademark
`
`infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and trademark dilution arising
`
`under the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051, et seq.
`
`(the “Lanham Act”), and for
`
`trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition, deceptive acts and practices and
`
`unjust enrichment under the laws of the State of New York and common law.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff Milk Studios, LLC is a limited liability company, organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 450 West 15th
`
`Street, New York, New York 10011. Under the umbrella of its house mark MILK, Plaintiff
`
`operates studios used for photography, video and music, and from the same premises engages in
`
`advertising, film equipment rental, music production, digital content production, post—production
`
`editing and similar services for all forms of digital media, and hosts events on behalf of fashion,
`corporate and individual clients, many of which feature live musical performances.
`C
`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`is a
`
`corporation organized under the laws of Korea, with its principal place of business at 416 Maetan-
`
`3dong, Yeongtong—gu, Suwon-City, Gyeonggi-do, Korea 443-742 (“SEC”). Upon information
`
`and belief, SEC is one of the world’s largest‘ electronics companies and designs, manufactures,
`
`and provides to the U.S. and world markets a wide range of products and services, including
`
`consumer electronics, computer components, and mobile and entertaimnent products.
`
`ME] I9289060v.1
`
`2
`
`

`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is a
`
`corporation organized under the laws of New York, with its principal place of business at 85
`
`Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660 (“SEA”). Upon information and belief,
`
`SEA is a subsidiary of SEC and manages the North American operations of Samsung
`
`Telecommunications America. Upon information, SEA markets, sells, and/or offers for sale a
`
`variety of consumer electronic devices for which Samsung also provides music and video
`
`streaming software applications and services under the name MILK.
`
`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, defendant Samsung Telecommunications America,
`
`LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place
`
`of business at 1301 East Lookout Drive, Richardson, Texas 75082 (“STA”). Upon information
`
`and belief, STA is a subsidiary of SEC and markets, sells, and/orioffers for sale a variety of
`
`personal and business communications devices in the United States, including Samsung Galaxy
`
`cell phones, for which Defendants also provide music and video streaming software applications
`
`and services under the misappropriated name MILK.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`8.
`
`This Court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ l33l
`
`and 1338(a) and (b) and 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116 and 1 121. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the
`
`principles of supplemental jurisdiction and 28 U.S.C. § 1367 over Milk’s claims for trademark
`
`infringement, trademark dilution, unfair competition and deceptive acts and practices under the
`
`laws of the State of New York and common law.
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over all of the Defendants because they do
`
`continual and ongoing business in the State of New York. Samsung distributes, promotes,
`
`provides, offers for sale and sells the music streaming downloadable software applications and
`
`services that are the subject of this Complaint via websites that are accessible to consumers in this
`
`ME] l9289060v.l
`
`3
`
`

`
`District. Samsung also distributes, promotes, offers for sale and sells the devices to which the
`
`music and video streaming services that are the subject of this Complaint are downloaded to
`
`consumers in this District.
`
`10.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and l400(a)
`
`because Samsung transacts business in this District and/or is subject to personal jurisdiction in
`
`this District. Venue is also proper in this District because Mi1k’s principal place of business is in
`
`this District, a substantial portion of the events giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred
`
`in this District and Milk suffered harm in this District.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Plaintiff’s Development of the MILK Trademark
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiff Milk is a creative, content and multimedia company that launched in
`
`1998 in New York City. Milk’s trademark and tradename were conceived by co—founder and
`
`Creative Director, Mazdack Rassi, who was drawn both to the architectural quality of the word
`
`MILK and its uniqueness in the context of Mi1k’s business.
`
`V 12.
`
`Milk began as, and remains today, a premiere photography studio and gallery
`
`attracting preeminent photographers, fashion designers, celebrities, artists, musicians and brands
`
`for editorial and commercial photo shoots and events. Milk grew rapidly from such beginnings
`
`and in 2009, expanded across the country opening facilities in Los Angeles. Mi1k’s offices and
`
`various galleries, photography studios, video production studios, music services and video
`
`equipment rental and music performance space are housed in its facilities in Manhattan (80,000
`
`square feet), Los Angeles (45,000 square feet) and Brooklyn (6,000 square feet).
`
`13.
`
`Milk operates its various businesses together as Milk, including among others,
`
`Milk Studios, Milk Gallery, Milk Made, Milk Agency and Milk Digital.
`
`MEI l9289060v.l
`
`

`
`14.
`
`As Plaintiff Milk’s reputation grew so did the convergence of photography, art,
`
`fashion, media, music and creativity under its roof. Recent events illustrate this convergence.
`
`15.
`
`On October 30, 2014, Milk Studios in Los Angeles hosted the “amFAR
`
`Inspiration Gala,” honoring fashion designer and film director, Tom Ford. The event was attended
`
`by celebrities and musicians such as Gwyneth Paltrow, Justin Timberlake, Miley Cyrus, and
`
`Rihanna and featured musical performances by Diana Ross and Chris Martin, lead-singer of the
`
`band Coldplay. Mr. Ford, recognizing Milk’s reputation, has chosen to show his Fall 2015
`
`collection at Milk in Los Angeles.
`
`16.
`
`Milk is often retained for photo shoots by major design houses, coinciding with
`
`their marketing and advertising campaigns, and during which Milk will often create video,
`
`photographic and music content to be used in various media in connection therewith.
`
`17.
`
`The resources Milk provides to its clients and collaborators include the equipment
`
`and tools to create, edit and perform a work; a place to create, edit, perform and display such
`
`work; events to showcase the performer; and the opportunity to connect with existing and new
`
`fans in person and through,
`
`for example, various social media and online platforms. For
`
`musicians, in particular, Milk can provide a place to play music, create and fine-tune new music
`
`and music videos, launch new albums, announce tours and projects and connect with fans through
`
`both live and digital performances, as well as through social media and online platforms where
`
`their music and other videos can be and are streamed digitally.
`
`18.
`
`Milk’s extraordinary reputation has been built in part on its special relationship
`
`with industry influencers -~ those who are celebrities in their own fields and who enjoy a
`
`significant public following. Through these influencers and through contemporary channels of
`
`communication, including internet communication, social media and live events, Milk reaches the
`
`MEI l9289060v.l
`
`

`
`larger community of those involved in the fashion, beauty, music, art and film industries, and
`
`their fans or followers.
`
`19.
`
`In furtherance of its strategic growth plans, in 2010, Milk launched its own online
`
`editorial platform, MILK MADE (www.milkmade.com), through which it showcases innovative
`
`talent in fashion, music, photography, art and film, by, among other things, streaming videos and
`
`curated playlists of music, using applications such as SoundCloud, Grooveshark, YouTube and
`
`Spotify.
`
`20.
`
`Since April 2011, Milk’s MILK MADE platform has been viewed more than 5.5
`
`million times by approximately 1.8 million visitors. As detailed below, Milk is present on a host
`
`of different web-based platforms with an even greater viewership.
`
`Building Goodwill and Brand Recognition in the MILK Mark
`
`21.
`
`From inception, Milk focused on building goodwill and brand recognition of the
`
`MILK mark. As part of its branding strategy, Milk consistently features the MILK mark as the
`
`banner under which all its businesses and services operate, including Milk’s website, marketing
`
`campaigns and materials, and even on the flag outside its New York offices. Milk strategically
`
`markets, advertises and promotes its creative services in the United States and throughout the
`
`world using word of mouth, strong. social media presence, unsolicited press coverage and
`
`advertising, experiential public relations events, gallery events, established and new media, and
`
`editorial in such publications as New York Magazine, Spin, The New York Times and others.
`
`22.
`
`Seeking to capitalize on Milk’s reputation and associations with influencers,
`
`corporate clients such as Ford Motor Company, Absolut Vodka, Red Bull, Smartwater, Lexus and
`
`Samsung hire Milk to produce and present promotional events in various locations around the
`
`world. For example,
`
`to promote the redesign of the Ford Fusion automobile, Ford Motor
`
`Company collaborated with Milk’s creative Legs division to create the “Wall to Wall: The Fusion
`
`ME] l9289060v.I
`
`6
`
`

`
`Collective,” a multimedia exhibit featuring six artists, including Been Trill, Lady Gaga’s former
`
`creative director who now collaborates with Kanye West and ShowStudio, and renowned fashion
`
`and conceptual art designer Cyril Duval. The contributors each created original artwork and
`
`documented their creative processes through‘ editorial and video. content. The Wall to Wall project
`
`opened in New York and traveled to Los Angeles.
`
`23.
`
`Milk promotes its sponsorship and cultural services, including its music and Video
`
`services, by partnering with social networking sites like Tumblr (httg//mlk.md/MilkTumblr)
`
`where Milk is ranked in the top ten fashion pages, Twitter (https://twitter.com/MilkStudios),
`
`Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/MilkMadeNY), Google+
`
`(https://plus.google.com/+MilkmadeNY/posts), Instagram (httg//instaggm.com/milkstudios/),
`
`SoundCloud (https://soundcloud.com/milkmade), Pinterest
`
`(flp://www.pinterest.com/milkstudios/), Vimeo (htt}3:_//mlk.md/MilkVimeo), and MySpace
`
`(https://myspace.com/milkmade). Over 1 million people follow Milk’s social channels, and more
`
`than 3 million people follow Mill<’s artists and media partners’ social channels.
`
`Milk, Music and Video
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through
`
`23 of this Complaint as if fully recited herein.
`
`25.
`
`Milk, while first launched as a premier photography studio, has in the past and
`
`continues today to provide a myriad of services relating to music, including streaming curated
`
`playlists of music through its website, creating and editing music videos, hosting musical
`
`performances and events, and enabling musicians to create and record music.
`
`26.
`
`Milk’s reputation and involvement in music is enhanced by its association and
`
`production of various live events such as the Creators Project, a 2010 Milk—hosted, day-long event
`
`sponsored by Intel Corporation and VICE that featured the work of leading international artists
`
`ME] 19239060»/.1
`
`7
`
`

`
`and musical performances by critically acclaimed artists, including M.I.A., Sleigh Bells, Die
`
`Antwoord and Interpol.
`
`In 2014, Milk again partnered with Intel Corporation to launch MUZSE,
`
`a multi—workshop initiative involving designers from different creative disciplines who aim to
`
`present ideas that connect technology to culture.
`
`27.
`
`Milk’s association with music goes further than current popular styles. In 2007,
`
`recognizing the ‘lack of classical music performances in downtown New York City, Milk
`
`partnered with CAMI, a division of Columbia Artists Management, and with Align Entertainment
`
`to create MILK Salon, a series of intimate gatherings held at Milk Studios at which classical
`
`musicians such as Lang Lang, Yundi Li and Janine Jensen performed. MILK Salon was designed
`
`to introduce classical music to trendsetters and people in the fashion industry in the hopes of
`
`spreading classical music to a new generation. Milk’s MILK Salon events found popularity in the
`
`music industry with collaborations with Universal Music Classics Group, Columbia Artists
`
`Management and Align Entertainment Group and were widely covered by the press, including
`
`The New York Times.
`
`28.
`
`Milk’s on—prernises “MILK Jam Room”, which started in 2006 as an in—house
`
`rehearsal space for its employees, has now become a unique recording, performance and event
`
`space.
`
`29.
`
`The MILK Jam Room has hosted performances and/or rehearsals by Cyndi
`
`Lauper, the Kills, Mark Ronson, Patti Smith, Thoephilus London and Icona Pop, among others.
`
`Audio and video content from MILK Jam Room performances as well as interviews with the
`
`performers is routinely streamed or otherwise made available on Milk’s MILKMADE.com digital
`
`platform.
`
`MEI l9289060v.l
`
`

`
`30.
`
`Milk’s trademark MILK features prominently in MILK Jam Room photos as
`
`shown below:
`
`
`
`31.
`
`Since 2011, Milk’s involvement with music has largely focused on creating and
`
`streaming curated music playlists, music videos and interviews with musicians on its MILK
`
`MADE internet platform. See, e. g., mtp://www.milkmade.con1/articles/3144-CMJ-5-Bands-Who-
`
`Killed-It#.VFGyKMmCXPw. For example, Milk cultivated a playlist of songs from bands that
`
`performed at the 2013 Coachella music festival and streamed it to the public on its MILK MADE
`
`platform. See http://wvvw.milkmade.com/articles/1970-Milk-Made-Mixtape—Coachella
`
`#.VFGOaMmCXPw.
`
`32.
`
`Milk also hosts listening sessions under the MILK brand for both established and
`
`up-and-coming artists across a variety of genres, including a listening party for the release of
`
`Kanye West’s critically acclaimed “Yeezuz” album that was attended by Jay-Z, Beyonce and
`
`Justin Timberlake, among others.
`
`33.
`
`Milk hosts art exhibits in its MILK GALLERY that often center around music. In
`
`2013, MILK GALLERY, with partner Boo Hooray, displayed hundreds of examples of
`
`homemade album cover—art by musicians from the 1970s’ and 19805’ North American, British
`
`and Australian punk scene, as well as from the world of Jamaican Dub, Ska and Rocksteady.
`
`In
`
`MEI 19289060v,l
`
`

`
`2009, MILK GALLERY held an exhibit of photographs detailing the history of the musical group
`
`THE POLICE, which lead to an informal musical performance in Milk’s Jam Room that same
`
`day. In 2007, MILK GALLERY also hosted an exhibit celebrating the release of the book “Tom
`
`Petty and the Heartbreakers Runnin’ Down a Dream.”
`
`34.
`
`Milk promotes music festivals such as the 2014 Global Citizens Festival in New
`
`York City during which artists such as Jay-Z, Beyonce, Tiesto, Fun, No Doubt and The Roots
`
`performed. Milk launched the festival at an event
`
`in the MILK Jam Room and the MILK
`
`GALLERY.
`
`35.
`
`Due to the remarkable unsolicited media coverage of Milk, brand opportunities,
`
`celebrity and influencer appreciation and its own marketing efforts, Milk has become the
`
`collaborating sponsor of choice to many creative and corporate leaders in all fields, in developing
`
`photographic, audio, and video content regularly featuring music.
`
`Milk’s Federally Registered Family of Milk Marks
`
`36.
`
`Milk is the owner of the following family of MILK-formative marks (collectively
`
`the “MILK Marks”):
`
`Mark
`
`MILK
`
`Registration No. /
`Serial No.
`
`Services
`
`3,312,318
`
`Class 35: Gallery for art exhibits; conducting
`and providing facilities for trade show
`exhibitions and for launching new products for
`others in the fields of art, photography, beauty
`products, print publications, automobiles,
`
`Al electronics, films, music, and fashions.
`
`Class 41: Providing a website featuring news,
`commentary, non—downloadable videos and
`photographs in the fields of music,
`entertainment and art; online journals, namely,
`blogs and online columns in the fields of
`fashion, beauty, music, entertainment and art.
`
`MILK MADE
`
`4,446,712
`
`‘
`
`MEI 19289060v.l
`
`10
`
`

`
`MILK GALLERY
`
`86/346,828
`
`Milk
`
`4,620,902
`
`Class 44: Providing a website featuring news,
`commentary, non-downloadable videos and
`photographs in the field of beauty.
`
`Class 45: Providing a website featuring news,
`commentary, non-downloadable videos and
`photographs in the field of fashion.
`
`Class 35: Gallery for art exhibits; conducting
`and providing facilities for trade show
`exhibitions and for launching new products for
`others in the fields of art, photography, beauty
`products, print publications, automobiles,
`electronics, films, music, and fashions.
`
`Class 35: Gallery for art exhibits; conducting
`and providing facilities for trade show
`exhibitions and for launching new products for
`others in the fields of art, photography, beauty
`products, print publications, automobiles,
`electronics, films, music, and fashions
`
`“l
`
` Class 481: Rental of photographic equipment
`
`3,236,886
`
`1
`
`(I§',‘¢y;;i;;.nn¢:}tt
`
`3,324,347
`
`""1
`
`Class 41: Photography studio; rental of
`photographic equipment
`
`8 Milk sihasqs
`
`Certified copies of the Certificates of Registration for Milk’s MILK-formative marks are
`
`attached as Exhibit B.
`
`37.
`
`The federal registrations for each of Mill<’s registered MILK-formative marks are
`
`valid, subsisting, unrevoked and uncancelled, and, at all times relevant, in full force and effect,
`
`MEI l9289060v.l
`
`ll
`
`

`
`and U.S. Application Serial No. 86/346,828 for the mark MILK GALLERY is valid, subsisting,
`
`unrevoked and, at all times relevant, in full force and effect. U.S. Registration Nos. 3,312,318,
`
`3,236,886 and 3,324,347 are incontestable pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1065, and thus serve as
`
`conclusive evidence of the validity of the marks MILK, MILK EQUIPMENT RENTAL (and
`
`Design) and MILK STUDIOS (and Design), respectively, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b).
`
`Samsung’s Knowledge of Plaintiff Milk
`
`38.
`
`Samsung has long been aware of Milk and the products and services that Milk
`
`provides under the MILK trademark. On no less than eighteen, separate occasions since August
`
`2006, Samsung has availed itself of Milk’s services and/or collaborated with Milk. These projects
`
`have included:
`
`I 0 Creating promotional materials for Samsung products;
`
`0 Launching the Samsung Infuse 4G mobile telephone in 2011;
`
`0 Launching Samsung’s new appliance offerings at the “Make Your House Work”
`
`exhibit held at Milk Gallery on June 18-20, 2012;
`
`0
`
`Sponsoring and providing various Samsung devices for GROUND magazine’s
`
`first exhibit at Milk’s MILK GALLERY on September 25, 2012. The Samsung
`
`devices were used to transform GROUND magazine into an interactive
`
`experience; and
`
`0 Holding a multiday photo shoot at Milk Studios for Vogue and GQ magazines in
`
`September 2014.
`
`39.
`
`Samsung’s personnel, including Samsung’s management, has routinely interfaced
`
`with Milk personnel and visited the premises and studios of Milk. Samsung personnel and its
`
`MEI 19289060v.l
`
`12
`
`

`
`management have had personal knowledge of the MILK marks, the services Milk provides and
`
`Milk’s reputation for providing cutting-edge media services under the MILK brand.
`
`Samsung Usurps Milk’s Trademark MILK
`
`40.
`Plaintiff repeats and restates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 39
`of this Complaint as if fully restated herein.
`
`41.
`
`Upon information and belief, there are approximately 174 million smartphone
`
`users in the United States, and Samsung is the second largest smartphone seller, commanding
`
`approximately twenty—nine percent of the market.
`
`In other words, more than 50 million people in
`
`the United States use Samsung smartphones.
`
`42.
`
`Upon information and belief, Samsung’s U.S. smartphone market share rose
`
`steadily in June, July and August 2014 inlconnection with the introduction of Samsung’s Galaxy
`
`S5 model.
`
`43.
`
`In 2013, Forbes rated Samsung the ninth most valuable global brand, up three
`
`positions from its 2012 rankings. According to Forbes, in 2013, Samsung’s brand value grew
`
`more than thirty percent faster than the most valuable brand, Apple.
`
`44.
`
`Upon information and belief, Samsung’s brand value grew fifty-three percent in
`
`2013.
`
`45.
`
`Samsung’s advertising reflects its worldwide business. Upon information and
`
`belief, in 2012, Samsung spent at least $4.3 billion globally on the advertising of its products and
`
`services, $597 million dollars of which was directed to the United States advertising mark

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket