Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA590798
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`03/05/2014
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous
`extension
`Address
`
`Navis, Inc.
`03/05/2014
`
`31029 Center Ridge Road
`Cleveland, OH 44145
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`Thomas A. Walsh
`Ice Miller LLP
`One American Square, Suite 2900
`Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200
`UNITED STATES
`ipdocket@icemiller.com, maurine.knutsson@icemiller.com,
`thomas.walsh@icemiller.com Phone:317-236-2100
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`86012986
`03/05/2014
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`
`11/05/2013
`03/05/2014
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated
`5775 Morehouse Drive
`San Diego, CA 921211714
`GERMANY
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 009. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Downloadable software in the nature of a
`mobile application for connecting smart phones with smart watches and for configuring settings for
`smart watches
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application/
`Registration No.
`Registration Date
`Word Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`TOQ
`watches and jewelry
`
`
`ESTTA590798
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`03/05/2014
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous
`extension
`Address
`
`Navis, Inc.
`03/05/2014
`
`31029 Center Ridge Road
`Cleveland, OH 44145
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`Thomas A. Walsh
`Ice Miller LLP
`One American Square, Suite 2900
`Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200
`UNITED STATES
`ipdocket@icemiller.com, maurine.knutsson@icemiller.com,
`thomas.walsh@icemiller.com Phone:317-236-2100
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`86012986
`03/05/2014
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`
`11/05/2013
`03/05/2014
`
`Qualcomm Incorporated
`5775 Morehouse Drive
`San Diego, CA 921211714
`GERMANY
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 009. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Downloadable software in the nature of a
`mobile application for connecting smart phones with smart watches and for configuring settings for
`smart watches
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application/
`Registration No.
`Registration Date
`Word Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`TOQ
`watches and jewelry
`
`
`
`Attachments
`
`NoticeofOpposition.pdf(26350 bytes )
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/thomasawalsh/
`Thomas A. Walsh
`03/05/2014
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of Trademark Serial No. 86/012,986
`
`For the Mark QUALCOMM TOQ
`Filed on March 5, 2014
`
`Navis, Inc.,
`
`Opposer
`
`V.
`Qualcomm Incorporated,
`Applicant
`
`Opposition No.:
`
`)
`
`j
`j
`j
`j
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Navis, Inc., an Ohio corporation, having a place of business at 31029 Center Ridge Rd.,
`
`Westlake, OH 44145 ("Opposer"), believes that it will be damaged by the registration of the
`
`above—identified QUALCOMM TOQ mark, and hereby opposes the same. The application for
`
`the QUALCOMM TOQ mark is owned by Qualcomm Incorporated, which is a Delaware
`
`corporation, having a place of business at 5775 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, California 92121-
`
`1714 ("Applicant"). The grounds for opposition are as follows:
`1.
`Opposer produces and sells a variety of incentive products including watches and
`
`jewelry. Opposer‘s products are sold throughout the United States.
`
`2.
`
`Opposer is the owner of the TOQ trademark, which Opposer uses in connection with
`
`several products, including watches and jewelry.
`
`3.
`
`Opposer is the owner of U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 86/211,724, which
`
`Opposer filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on March 5, 2014, for the
`
`trademark TOQ in Class 14 for "watches and jewelry."
`
`I/35l9663.2
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Opposer has been using the TOQ mark to identify the source of its products in
`
`commerce since at least as early as January 2013. Since that time, Opposer has established
`
`substantial goodwill in the TOQ mark.
`
`5.
`
`The TOQ mark has come to indicate and stand for the high quality products offered
`
`by Opposer.
`
`6.
`
`As a result of the extensive use of the TOQ mark by Opposer, the TOQ mark has
`
`become, and continues to be, a valuable property right of Opposer.
`
`7.
`
`The description of services for the QUALCOMM TOQ application indicates that
`
`Applicant has a bona fide intent to sell “downloadable software in the nature of a mobile
`
`application for connecting smart phones with smart watches and for configuring settings for
`
`smart watches sells a variety of automotive parts.”
`
`8.
`
`The QUALCOMM TOQ application was filed by Applicant under Section l(b) and
`
`Applicant did not provide the USPTO with evidence of its use of the QUALCOMM TOQ mark
`
`in commerce. However, upon information and belief, Applicant
`
`is currently using the
`
`QUALCOMM TOQ mark in commerce.
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer's actual, continuous, and continuing use of the
`
`TOQ mark began before Applicant began using its QUALCOMM TOQ mark in commerce.
`
`10.
`
`Because of the similarities between the TOQ mark and the QUALCOMM TOQ mark
`
`(as well as the similarities between Opposer's and Applicant's products and target markets), the
`
`use and registration of the QUALCOMM TOQ mark is likely to result
`
`in confusion and
`
`substantial damage and injury to Opposer. Persons familiar with Opposer's TOQ mark are likely
`
`to buy Applicant's products under the mistaken belief that they originate with, or are licensed,
`
`
`
`sponsored or approved by Opposer. Any such confusion would inevitably result in loss of sales
`
`to Opposer, and tarnish Opposer's goodwill and reputation established in the TOQ mark.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that the application for Trademark Serial No. 86/012,986
`
`be rejected.
`
`Dated this 5th day_of March 2014.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/Thomas A. Walsh
`Attorneyfor Opposer
`Thomas A. Walsh
`
`ICE MILLER LLP
`
`One American Square ,
`Suite 2900
`
`Indianapolis, Indiana 46282-0200
`(317) 236-2100
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 5, 2014 the foregoing Notice of
`Opposition was served by first—c1ass United States mail, postage prepaid, and by electronic mail
`upon the following:
`
`N. Christopher Norton
`Arent Fox LLP
`
`1717 K St NW
`
`Washington, District Of Columbia 20036-5342
`
`By: s/Thomas A. Walsh
`Thomas A. Walsh
`
`Atfarneyfor Opposer
`
`I/35l9663.2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
