`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA758636
`
`Filing date:
`
`07/15/2016
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91214673
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Defendant
`Future Publishing Limited
`
`ROBERT N PHILLIPS
`REED SMITH LLP
`101 SECOND STREET, SUITE 1800
`SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
`UNITED STATES
`IPDocket-CHI@reedsmith.com, robphillips@reedsmith.com, nbor-
`ders@reedsmith.com, dkalahele@reedsmith.com
`
`Other Motions/Papers
`
`Robert N. Phillips
`
`robphillips@reedsmith.com, dkalahele@reedsmith.com
`
`/s/ Robert N. Phillips
`
`07/15/2016
`
`2016-07-15 Future PLC Correspondence to TTAB Re Public Filing of 10-15-04
`Concurrent Trading Agreement and Deed of Trademark Assignment.pdf(679049
`bytes )
`
`
`
`Reed Smith LLP
`101 Second Street
`Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
`Tel +1 415 543 8700
`Fax +1 415 391 8269
`reedsmith Com
`
`Reed
`
`.
`.
`R.°b°” ”- P“""P$
`Direct Phone: +1 415 659 5953
`Email:
`robphi|lips@reedsmith.com
`
`July 15, 2016
`
`Elizabeth J. Winter
`
`interlocutory Attorney
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`Re: Edge Games, Inc. v. Future Publishing Ltd., Opposition No. 91214673;
`Cancellation No. 92062034
`
`Dear Ms. Winter:
`
`This will confirm that Future Publishing has no objection to the complete public filing of the October
`15, 2004 Concurrent Trading Agreement and Deed of Trademark Assignment that was filed completely
`redacted by Edge Games.
`
`The confidentiality clause appears to cover information received or obtained as a result of the
`agreement, and the negotiations leading up to the agreement, but not the agreement itself (see clause
`6.8(a)).
`
`The agreement itself allows disclosure of confidential information for legal proceedings (see clause
`6.8(b)(i)).
`
`Substantial portions were referenced in a publicly available Particulars of Claim filed in a UK action.
`
`The entire agreement was annexed unredacted to Mr. Langdell's First Witness Statement and Mark
`Millar’s Third Statement in the UK High Court proceedings in 2010 (which we believe are also publicly
`available —— although one might need to make an application to see it).
`
`Substantial portions are also reproduced in the Judgment of Proudman J (see para 42 onwards here
`http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/1489.html) which confirmed the termination of the
`agreement by Future due to Edge’s repudiatory breaches.
`
`Therefore, we submit that no redaction of the agreement is necessary, and that Edge’s full redaction is
`not in compliance with the Board’s rules.
`
`ABU DHABI 0 ATHENS 0 BEIJING 0 CENTURY CITY 0 CHICAGO 0 DUBAI 0 FRANKFURT 0 HONG KONG O HOUSTON 9 KAZAKHSTAN 9 LONDON 0 LOS ANGELES 9 MUNICH 9 NEW YORK 6 PARIS
`PHILADELPHIA 9 PITTSBURGH O PRINCETON ORICHMOND 0 SAN FRANCISCO 6 SHANGHAI 0 SILICON VALLEY 9 SINGAPORE 9 TYSONS 6 WASHINGTON, D.C. O WILMINGTON
`
`US_ACT|VE-127715287.1-RNPHILLI 07/15/2016 2:31 PM
`
`
`
`Elizabeth Winter
`July 15, 2016
`Page 2
`
`Feel free to Contact me if you have any questions.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`
`Q
`
`Robert N. Phillips
`Counsel for Future Pubhs ing
`
`RNP:dk

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site