`ESTTA617257
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`07/23/2014
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91207982
`Defendant
`iConnectUS LLC
`ANDREW H DO
`OSWALD AND YAP
`16148 SAND CANYON AVENUE
`IRVINE, CA 92618
`UNITED STATES
`ado@oswald-yap.com
`Opposition/Response to Motion
`Andrew H. Do
`ado@oswald-yap.com
`/Andrew H. Do/
`07/23/2014
`2014-07-23 opp 2 mtn 2 compel dis.pdf(26681 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`
`
`222,605
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91207982
`
`
`
`In the Matter of Serial No. 85/626,388
`Filed: May 15,2012
`-----------------------------------------------------X
`Crytek Entertainment GmbH, a/k/a,
`:
`Gface GmbH
`
`
`
`:
`Opposer,
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`:
`Applicant.
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`-----------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`iConnectUS LLC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICANT’S OPPOSITION TO OPPOSER’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
`
`
`
`Applicant iConnectUS LLC (“Applicant”) by and through its attorneys submits
`
`this Opposition to Opposer’s Gface GmbH (“Opposer”) motion to compel discovery which was
`
`filed on July 3, 2013.
`
`As outlined in Opposer’s motion to compel, Opposer’s attorney Mr. Ned Branthover was
`
`in communication with Applicant’s prior attorney Mr. Mark Morrison regarding the timing of
`
`Applicant’s responses to Opposer’s First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production
`
`of Documents.
`
`Mr. Morrison withdrew as Applicant’s counsel on May 27, 2013. On June 7, 2013
`
`Opposer was notified by attorney Barak Vaughn, who indicated that he was in the process of
`
`being retained by Applicant. On June 26, 2013 Mr. Branthover emailed Mr. Vaughn and
`
`Applicant to discuss the timing of Applicant’s responses. Later that same day, Mr. Vaughn
`
`
`
`emailed Mr. Branthover that Mr. Vaughn would not be representing Applicant in this matter.
`
`Applicant did not hear from Opposer or its counsel Mr. Branthover again after June 26, 2013.
`
`On July 3, 2013, Opposer filed its Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. This
`
`Motion was mailed to an ineffective address (2299 Pacific Ave., Costa Mesa, CA 92627) that
`
`was provided by Applicant’s previous attorney, Mark Morrison, at the time of the substitution on
`
`May 27, 2013. Consequently, Applicant did not receive notice of this Motion.
`
`Due to Applicant’s failure to file any opposition, on August 19, 2013 the TTAB issued an
`
`Order compelling Applicant to file its responses to Opposer’s discovery requests by September
`
`18, 2013. This Order was also mailed to the improper address above, and Applicant never
`
`received it.
`
`On September 23, 2013 Opposer filed its Motion for Entry of Default Judgment due to
`
`Applicant’s failure to comply with the TTAB Order of August 19, 2013. Opposer’s Motion
`
`was again served at the same 2299 Pacific Ave. address as listed above. Therefore, Applicant
`
`also did not receive notice of this Motion.
`
`On September 24, 2013 the TTAB issued an Order suspending proceedings pending
`
`disposition of Opposer’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. This Order was sent to the
`
`same ineffective address for Applicant and returned undelivered by the United States Postal
`
`Service. The TTAB was then able to locate Applicant’s correct address from its website online
`
`and thereafter issued an Order on March 3, 2014 granting Applicant fifteen days from that date
`
`to file its opposition.
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`2
`
`
`
`Applicant retained its current counsel, Andrew Do of OSWALD & YAP, APC, on March
`
`18, 2014 who immediately filed on March 19, 2014 a Motion for Extension of Time to Respond
`
`to Opposer’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment pursuant to the TTAB’s Order of March 3,
`
`2014. Applicant’s Petition was granted on April 24, 2014, and Applicant was given ten days
`
`from that date to file its Opposition.
`
`On July 8, 2014 the TTAB granted’s Applicant’s Motion to Set Aside the Default
`
`Judgment and allowed Applicant’s fifteen days from that date to file its Opposition to Opposer’s
`
`Motion to Compel.
`
`As outlined above, Applicant did not hear from Opposer’s attorney Mr. Branthover again
`
`after Mr. Vaughn indicated he would not represent Applicant. Instead of contacting Applicant
`
`directly to discuss the deadline for the discovery responses, Mr. Branthover left the situation in
`
`an ambiguous status because Applicant had no way of knowing what was discussed between Mr.
`
`Branthover and Mr. Vaughn. Mr. Branthover’s decision to jump the gun and file a motion to
`
`compel without attempting to contact Applicant, coupled with his service of the motion at the
`
`wrong address of Applicant, placed Applicant in an unfair situation. Regarding the discovery
`
`responses, Applicant has hired new counsel and is prepared to respond to Opposer’s discovery
`
`requests.
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`\\\
`
`3
`
`
`
`In view of Applicant’s lack of notice and Opposer’s contributory neglect in clarifying the
`
`deadline of the responses, there is ample evidence to demonstrate excusable neglect on the part
`
`of Applicant. Applicant respectfully request that the Board deny Opposer’s Motion to Compel
`
`and allow Applicant 60 days to respond to Opposer’s First Set of Interrogatories and First
`
`Request for Production of Documents.
`
`
`
`Date: July 23, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`Andrew H. Do
`OSWALD & YAP, APC
`16148 Sand Canyon Avenue
`Irvine, California 92618
`Tel: 949-788-8900
`Fax: 949-788-8980
`Email: ado@oswald-yap.com
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`iConnectUS LLC
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that this 23rd day of July, 2014, a copy of the foregoing was sent via
`
`Email, Facsimile and U.S. first-class mail to the following:
`
`Mr. Ned W. Branthover
`ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB
`666 Third Avenue
`New York, New York 10017
`Tel: 212-949-9022
`Fax: 212 949-9190
`
`Email: nwbranthover@lawabel.com
`
`
`
`Andrew H. Do
`
`
`
`5

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site