Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA876829
`
`Filing date:
`
`02/12/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91207632
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Plaintiff
`Pak's Trading Europe B.V.
`
`MILENA S MISHEV
`KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARZ & OTTESEN LLP
`100 MATAWAN RD STE 120
`MATAWAN, NJ 07747
`UNITED STATES
`Email: mmishev@kbsolaw.com
`
`Reply in Support of Motion
`
`Milena S. Mishev
`
`mmishev@kbsiplaw.com, trademark@buchalter.com
`
`/milena s. mishev/
`
`02/12/2018
`
`OPPOSER REPLY TO APPLICANT OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REOPEN
`SUSPEND AND EXTEND TIME.pdf(30962 bytes )
`Exhibit A.pdf(600501 bytes )
`Exhibit B.pdf(480560 bytes )
`Exhibit C.pdf(2037977 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part1.pdf(4115132 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part2.pdf(3871751 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part3.pdf(4017749 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part4.pdf(3916553 bytes )
`Exhibit D_Part5.pdf(1429797 bytes )
`Exhibit E.pdf(1345045 bytes )
`Y.S. Park Declaration.pdf(724734 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________
`
`PAK’S TRADING EUROPE B.V.,
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JUNKFOOD CLOTHING LLC,
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`
`Opposition No.: 91207632
`
`App. Serial No. 77/958107
`
`Mark:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OPPOSER’S REPLY TO APPLICANT’S OPPOSITION TO OPPOSER’S MOTION
`
`TO REOPEN/AMEND DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES
`
`
`
`Opposer, Pak’s Trading Europe B.V. (“Opposer) through its attorneys, hereby submits its
`
`Reply to Applicant’s Opposition to Opposer’s Motion to Reopen/Amend Opposer’s Time to
`
`Make Initial Disclosures, Expert Disclosures and Extend Discovery and all Trial Dates in this
`
`proceeding, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Opposer has been treated unethically by Applicant’s Predecessor in rights,
`
`Junkfood Clothing Company (hereinafter “Old Junkfood”). Since the commencement of this
`
`proceeding on October 22, 2012 to about March 15, 2017 when the last consent motion for
`
`suspension was filed by Applicant’s Predecessor’s, Old Junkfood, (Docket Entry No. 52),
`
`submitted hereto as Exhibit A, Opposer has been continuously misled by Applicant’s
`
`Predecessor’s, Old Junkfood, about Applicant’s Predecessor’s intent to settle this case.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Furthermore, Opposer’s consent to the multiple motions to suspend this opposition proceeding
`
`has been fraudulently obtained by Applicant’s Predecessor, Old Junkfood, by engaging in what
`
`now appears to be mock settlement negotiations. Thus, Opposer’s trust in fair business dealings
`
`in this country has been seriously devoured.
`
`2.
`
`Opposer would like to clarify that in its Motion to Reopen/Amend Opposer’s
`
`Time to Make Initial Disclosures, Expert Disclosures and Extend Discovery and all Trial Dates,
`
`Opposer did not provide characterizations of its Principal’s ability or inability to act. Opposer
`
`simply laid down the chronology of events regarding its Principal’s health and supported such
`
`facts with statements made by medical doctors knowledgeable of Mr. Park’s medical condition.
`
`It is only in this Board’s discretion to interpret the facts and make a decision on how this
`
`cancellation should further proceed, based on such facts.
`
`3.
`
`In its Opposition to Opposer’s Motion, Applicant misinterprets the facts.
`
`Applicant accuses Opposer of not answering Applicant’s October 19, 2017 settlement offer. In
`
`fact, on October 25, 2017, Opposer’s Principal Mr. Park expressed his willingness to personally
`
`discuss the settlement offer with Applicant’s principal. (Exhibit B). Opposer’s invitation was
`
`bluntly declined by Applicant.
`
`4.
`
`Furthermore, in its Opposition to Opposer’s Motion, Applicant refers to a demand
`
`letter received by Applicant’s Korean distributor with regard to the trademarks at issue.
`
`Opposer submits that parallel between the two jurisdictions is impractical. The Republic of
`
`Korea is a civil law country, whereas, The United States is a common law country. The two
`
`jurisdictions have a completely different structure of rules of civil procedure and, therefore,
`
`require a different level of participation by the parties to a legal conflict. (Exhibit C). Moreover,
`
`the main content of the demand letter dated November 28, 2017, was prepared by Opposer’s
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Korean attorney and approved by Opposer’s Principal Mr. Park back in 2013. The demand letter,
`
`however, was put on hold due to the commencement of settlement negotiations between Opposer
`
`and Applicant’s Predecessor, Old Junkfood. (Park Decl. ¶4). Although, the November 28, 2017
`
`letter, attached hereto as Exhibit D, is in Korean, it is evident that it refers to Opposer’s protected
`
`marks and contains evidence of Applicant’s current infringing imports to Korea.
`
`5.
`
`Opposer’s Principal Mr. Park is a graduate of the Korea University Law School,
`
`which is highly ranked amidst world-leading educational institutions – comes in 48th place
`
`amongst 300 university law schools worldwide. (Exhibit E). Mr. Park, who also holds degrees in
`
`business administration and international studies, was recently offered collegial help from the
`
`fellow alumni of the Korea University Law School who came to lend a hand in a difficult time
`
`offering to handle the matter with Applicant’s Korean distributor at a very low preferential fee.
`
`(Park Decl. ¶5). This is the reason, why Opposer’s Korean counsel was advised that Mr. Park is
`
`handling the case himself. Id.
`
`6.
`
`Applicant is further accusing Opposer of “distorting the ability for Opposer to
`
`participate in the proceedings, such that Opposer participates when it chooses to do so, and
`
`delays when convenient. Opposer respectfully declares that nothing in Opposer’s actions, i.e.,
`
`requesting business-to-business meeting with Applicant, initiating a trademark demand letter in
`
`Korea, or authorizing a settlement proposal, contradicts the current daring state of Opposer’s
`
`Principal Mr. Park’s health. Opposer’s Principal Mr. Park’s decision to take action was against
`
`his physician’s recommendations. Opposer’s Principal Mr. Park has been pushed to the corner by
`
`the belligerent behavior of Applicant, Junkfood Clothing LLC, which has so far shown complete
`
`disregard to Opposer’s rights and interests in the subject marks. For years, Opposer has been
`
`successful in its concerted efforts to police Opposer’s rights against infringing uses by many
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`companies including, but not limited, to Nike, Kohl’s, Walmart, John Varvatos, Guru Denim dba
`
`True Religion Brand Jeans, Louis Vuitton Malletier. Despite his serious health issues, Opposer’s
`
`Principal Mr. Park is determined to continue defending Opposer’s trademark rights and interests
`
`in the marks at issue. (Park Decl. ¶6).
`
`In light of the foregoing, Opposer believes that it deserves its motion to be granted.
`
`However, Opposer is ready to defer to the Board’s judgment with regard to how this opposition
`
`should further proceed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 12, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP
`
` /Milena S. Mishev/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`_________________________
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V.
`
`100 Matawan Road, Ste. 120
`
`Matawan, NJ 07747
`
`732.578.0103 ext. 227 (Telephone)
`
`732.578.0104 (Facsimile)
`
`mmishev@kbsiplaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS BEING FILED
`ELECTRONICALLY WITH THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
`
`
`Date: February 12, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Milena S. Mishev/ .
`
`
` Milena S. Mishev
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Milena S. Mishev, hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing REPLY
`TO APPLICANT’S OPPOSITION TO OPPOSER’S MOTION TO REOPEN/AMEND
`DISCOVERY AND TRIAL DATES to be served on counsel for Applicant by sending a copy on
`this 12th day of February, 2018, via electronic mail to:
`
`
`Jessie K. Reider
`Matthew L. Seror
`Amanda T. Alameddine
`trademark@buchalter.com
`
`
`By: .
`
` /Milena S. Mishev/ .
`
`Milena S. Mishev
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. httQ://estta.usgto.gov
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`ESTTA807319
`
`Filing date:
`
`03/15/2017
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`91207632
`
`Defendant
`JunkFood Clothing Company
`
`J PARKS WORKMAN
`DORITY & MANNING PA
`75 BEATTIE PL, STE 1600
`GREENVILLE, SC 29601
`UNITED STATES
`
`pworkman@dority-manning.com, docketing@dority-manning.com,
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Ihensel@dority-manning.com
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No. 91207632
`
`Serial No. 77/958,107
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`)
`)
`
`In the matter of Serial No. 77/958,107
`
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V.,
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`Junkfood Clothing Company,
`
`Applicant.
`
`Mark:
`
`CONSENT MOTION FOR SUSPENSION
`
`Applicant, Junkfood Clothing Company (“Junkfood”), with the consent of Opposer,
`
`Pak’s Trading Europe B.V. (“Pak’s”), moves for an additional 90-day suspension of all deadlines
`
`in this matter. Good cause exists for the suspension because the parties are actively engaged in
`
`settlement discussions and are close to reaching a final resolution. A detailed report is provided
`
`below:
`
`1.
`
`Junkfood and Pak’s are currently engaged in settlement discussions to resolve this
`
`matter and two separate proceedings, including Cancellation No. 92055779 and Cancellation No.
`
`92057634, which were more recently filed.
`
`2.
`
`The settlement discussions between Junkfood and Pak’s have been complicated
`
`because of the complex nature of the various proceedings. The settlement discussions have
`
`included the discussion of numerous terms that could lead to resolution of this particular matter
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`and the additional proceedings and so that the parties can resolve complex issues concerning
`
`worldwide rights.
`
`3.
`
`Since December 2014, the parties have diligently engaged in numerous exchanges
`
`of formal draft settlement proposals resulting in the narrowing of the issues needed to be
`
`addressed. Issues that have been resolved include scope of the settlement, timelines for actions,
`
`and forum issues. Since the last extension, the parties have exchanged further edits on a draft
`
`settlement agreement and are working towards final execution of a formal, written settlement
`
`agreement. The parties hope to finalize the formal written settlement agreement to resolve this
`
`Opposition No. 91207632 and Cancellation Nos. 92055779 and 92057634.
`
`4.
`
`Thus, the parties request a 90-day suspension of proceedings so that final edits to
`
`a formal written settlement agreement can be completed.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the parties’ respectfully request that the Board grant a 90-day
`
`suspension of proceedings so that resolution of the issues can be finalized.
`
`Time to Answer:
`
`Deadline for Discovery Conference :
`
`Discovery Opens :
`
`Initial Disclosures Due :
`
`Expert Disclosures Due :
`
`Discovery Period to Close :
`
`Plaintiff Pretrial Disclosures :
`
`Plaintiff's 30-day Trial Period Ends :
`
`Defendant's Pretrial Disclosures :
`
`Defendant's 30-day Trial Period ends :
`
`Plaintiff‘s Rebuttal Disclosures :
`
`Plaintiff's 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends :
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`CLOSED
`
`CLOSED
`
`CLOSED
`
`CLOSED
`
`12/08/2017
`
`01/07/2018
`
`02/21/2018
`
`04/07/2018
`
`04/22/2018
`
`06/08/2018
`
`06/21/2018
`
`06/21/2018
`
`

`

`Plaintiff‘s Opening Brief Due
`
`Defendant's Brief Due
`
`Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due
`
`09/19/2018
`
`10/19/2018
`
`11/03/2018
`
`Date: March 15, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DORITY & MANNING, P.A.
`
`/Jason A. Pittman]
`Jason A. Pittman
`
`J. Parks Workman
`
`DORITY & MANNING, P.A.
`PO Box 1449
`
`Greenville, SC 29602
`Phone: 864-271-1592
`
`Fax: 864-335-0127
`
`jpittman@dorifl-manning.com
`jworkman@dorig-manning.com
`Attorneys for Opposer
`Junkfood Clothing Company
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 15, 20171 served a true and complete copy of the foregoing
`
`CONSENT MOTION FOR SUSPENSION on opposing counsel Via First Class Mail, postage
`
`prepaid as follows:
`
`Milena S. Mishev
`
`Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz, & Ottesen, LLP
`Metropark South
`100 Matawan Road, Suite 120
`
`Matawan, NJ 07747
`
`/Jason A. Pittman/
`
`Jason A. Pittman
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Milena Mishev
`
`
`From:
`
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Dear Jessie,
`
`Milena Mishev
`
`Wednesday, October 25, 2017 1:46 PM
`'Reider, Jessie K.‘
`Alameddine, Amanda
`
`RE: Settlement (Pak's Trading ./. Junkfood Clothing) [IWOV-BN.FID2365985]
`
`The CEO of Pak’s Trading, Dr. Y.S. Park, has advised that he would like to get in touch with the CEO ofJunkfood Clothing
`
`LLC to discuss in person the general terms of the settlement agreement.
`
`Could you please provide to me the name and contact information of the new Junkfood’s CEO so that I may pass it on to
`
`my client.
`
`Thank you.
`
`Milena S. Mishev"
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP
`
`MetroPark South | 100 Matawan Road, Ste 120 | Matawan, NJ 07747
`www.kbsiglaw.com
`
`mmishev kbsi
`|aw.com | Skype: milena.mishev1
`732—578—0103 ext. 227 (voice)
`917-348—1735 (mobile)
`732678—0104 (fax)
`
`NEW YORK OFFICE:
`
`Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP
`600 Third Avenue, 2nd Floor
`New York, New York 10016
`
`This e-mail message and any documents accompanying it contain information that belongs to Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen, LLP,
`and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individua|(s) or entity(ies) named
`above.
`If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action
`in reliance on the contents of this message and/or accompanying documents is strictly prohibited.
`If you have received this e-mail
`message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at +1-732-578-0103.
`
`*Milena S. Mishev is admitted to the New York Bar ONLY
`
`From: Reider, Jessie K. [mailto:jreider@buchalter.com]
`Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:19 PM
`
`To: Milena Mishev <mmishev@kbsiplaw.com>; Reider, Jessie K. <jreider@buchalter.com>
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT C
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`7- » I
`
`»
`
`7-
`
`I » Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law
`
`Difference Between Common Law and Civil
`Lavv
`
`—2.;Iz_.Is: ‘13,.12Ji'3 -
`
`by Farham ' 6 miw res;
`
`00¢®®®0
`
`' FASTEFleTERN
`W
`
`When one looks into the legal systems prevalent in
`
`the world, one may come across many legal systems,
`
`practiced in various countries, which bear their roots
`
`from the legal systems practiced in the European
`
`continent. Though all
`
`legal systems have the same
`
`.- purpose of regulating and harmonizing the human
`
`OVER 99.9% NETWO
`
`”fig?
`
`_
`
`2.
`
`action within their respective societies, these legal
`.
`..
`,.
`.
`.
`.
`, systems are all driven towards certain fundamental
`likenesses and differences in their lawful frameworks. Most countries today follow one of the two
`most prominent legal systems: common law or civil
`law. The common law system developed in
`
`England amid the middle ages and was applied to the former British colonies across the world. And
`
`the civil law system created in Europe was applied in the colonies of European imperial powers such
`
`as Spain and Portugal.
`
`There are also some countries in which the civil law and the common law have been working together
`
`in what might be known as a “mixed jurisdiction," like in Sri Lanka, Quebec, Scotland and South Africa.
`
`This article tries to explain these two systems and to distinguish the fundamental difference between
`
`common law and civil law based on their methods of thought and attitudes towards the law as a legal
`syste m.
`
`The source of law remains the main source of difference between common law and civil law. Even
`
`though common law frameworks make reference to statute law, case law or judicial precedents
`
`remain to be the most important source of law, which givesjudges a dynamic part in creating rules. In
`
`civil
`
`law system, extensive reference is made to codes and statutes that are designed to cover all
`
`eventualities, and thejudges tend to have a much-limited role to play in terms of applying the codified
`
`law to particular situations. Thus precedents of case laws would only be used as mere guidelines.
`
`Accordingly, when cases are heard under the civil
`
`law legal systems, the judges act simply as
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law—and-ciViI—law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law I Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 2 of 7
`
`investigators, while in common-law systems, the judges seem to hold a more prominent role by
`
`acting as arbitrators between the two conflicting parties.
`
`COMMON LAW
`VERSUS
`
`CIVIL LAW
`
`Common law is not
`codified
`
`Civil law is a codified
`set of laws
`
`Judicial precedents
`are binding
`
`Iudicial precedents
`are not binding
`
`
`
`Iudges make rulings,
`set precedent, and
`moderate between
`the conflicting
`parties
`
`Iudge’s role is to
`establish the facts of
`the case and to apply
`the provisions of the
`applicable code
`
`Main source is
`
`judicial precedents
`or case law
`
`Statutes and other
`
`subsidiary
`legislations are the
`main sources
`
`An adversarial
`system
`
`An inquisitorial
`system
`
`lP’eda'tmcom
`
`,,
`
`\
`
`.-.rl,.,i,,:,.
`
`i.“
`
`Common law is largely uncodified. This implies that there is no complete compilation of legal
`
`principles and statutes. Thus a common law system is less prescriptive than a civil law system. While
`
`common law relies on few statutes, which are a result of the decisions of the legislative authority, it is
`
`extensively based on precedents or the judicial decisions made in comparable cases — generally the
`
`decisions of higher courts, which entrust thejudges of the common law system with enormous role in
`
`shaping the law. For instance, the elements expected to demonstrate the crime of homicide are
`
`contained in the case law, as opposed to the law characterized by statute. To ensure uniformity,
`
`courts follow the precedents set by higher courts in cases dealing with similar matters.
`
`http ://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law-and-civil-law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 16... Page 3 of 7
`
`These precedents are recorded and are documented as case laws through yearbooks, and legal
`
`reports. Common law functions as an adversarial system where the judge acts as a moderator
`
`between the two conflicting parties.
`
`Common law systems can be seen in the previous English colonies such as Australia, India, Sri Lanka,
`
`Canada and the United States. Common law lawyers claim that their system is more flexible since it
`
`can adjust to circumstances without any legislative interference.
`
`
`
`law is codified and has its origin in the
`The civil
`Roman Law. Countries with civil
`law frameworks
`
`have a wide-ranging and a constantly updated legal
`
`principles that encompass all matters fit for being
`
`brought before a court — the relevant procedures,
`
`and the fitting punishment for every offense. Such
`
`Combine PDF Files (Free)
`law:
`of
`classes
`distinctive
`recognize
`codes
`Streamline YourDocumems
`substantive law builds up which acts are liable to
`criminal or civil prosecution; the procedural
`law a» 23:?ch{31/ ngvynllagalhcfigiiime
`lays down the rules for determining if a specific
`
`activity constitutes a criminal act, while the penal
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between-common—law—and—ciViI-law/
`
`1/1 8/201 8
`
`
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, 1e... Page 4 of 7
`
`code specifies the punishments and penalties for certain acts. In a civil law system, the judge's part is
`
`to build up the facts of the case and to apply the statute law, thus making legislative enactments
`
`binding. Although a judge brings the formal charges, investigates the matter, and provided the verdict
`
`on the case, he or she functions within a framework of codified and structured legal rules and
`
`principles. Thus it could be stated that thejudge's role in shaping the law choice is subsequently less
`
`significant in the civil law systems, compared to the legislators and the legal jurists who have the
`
`authority to draft and interpret the codes.
`
`Countries which were former French, Dutch, German, Spanish or Portuguese colonies, including much
`
`of Central and South America and most of the Central and Eastern European and East Asian countries
`
`law structure. A civil
`also follow a civil
`common law framework.
`
`law framework is by and large more prescriptive than a
`
`Legal personalities in civil-law jurisdictions believe that their system is more steady and reasonable
`
`than common-law systems since the laws are expressed explicitly and are easier to determine in civil
`
`jurisdictions.
`
`
`
`
`
`Common Law: Common law is not codified.
`
`Civil Law: Civil law is a codified set of laws.
`
`judicial Decisions
`
`Common Law: Thejudicial precedents are binding.
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference-between—common-law—and-civil-law/
`
`1/18/201 8
`
`

`

`Difference Between Common Law and Civil Law | Comparison of methods of thought, le... Page 5 of 7
`
`Civil Law:Judicial precedents are not considered to be binding.
`
`Common Law: Thejudges make rulings, set precedent and moderate between the conflicting parties.
`
`Civil Law: The judge's role is to establish the facts of the case and to apply the provisions of the
`
`applicable code.
`
`Common Law: The main source isjudicial precedents or case law.
`
`Civil Law: Statutes and other subsidiary legislations are the main sources.
`
`Court Practice
`
`Common Law: The court practice is an adversarial system.
`
`Civil Law: The court practice is an inquisitorial system.
`
`Reference:
`
`Key Features of Common Law or Civil Law Systems. (/7. 01). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`What is the difference between common and civil law? (20 73). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. (n.d.). Retrieved August 09, 2076, from
`
`image Courtesy:
`
`”Statua iustitiae” By Deva/ Kuishrestha — File: 7 660 b/k 79329 zoom.png
`
`.
`
`via
`
`”Law3" By Rifqijam/i — Own work
`
`via ,
`
`00©®©®0
`
`
`
`
`http://pediaa.com/difference—between—common—law-and-civil-law/
`
`1/1 8/2018
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT D
`
`

`

`SEOCHO BO. 130): 437
`Dongwon 1:8:3 Building
`so MabangnRo, Seucho-Ku
`Seoul 06775, Korea
`
`_ I‘
`.-
`—-- Pg: EL. -$ $ -——
`+
`91:- ’° 3
`43') I
`$
`F I RSTL AW I N TE RNAT IONAL
`
`TEL : (02)589-2410
`FAX : (132)539-2422
`Mail@FL-international.coJcr
`
`201776. 11% 28%
`
`
`
`3“- fl : @1321/11—251101201114
`
`HEW} Wfléflr
`
`14% 70112}? 03%EHE 617, 13% (%*§%, 515101213)
`
`1% £1 : wealfixflfldnE/fiéi 1:31:11 $103211 (02—589—0051), 3:11:11
`
`11% A121? 121% 60, 18% (012%, %%o11£21fi1 are!)
`
`[Equmlfi EVEN/“1%? 33% EEOKQH 531101501 u]y_o1)
`
`$310M} Moi/x]
`
`HERE 9152101 flag-PT 1432 %?11%BJE%H:1 6]
`
`fl] g ;
`
`2313114 73%]1‘53-‘31011 1111?} %“Z1 9533
`
`1—.
`fl
`'|_.
`1% m: mm @0121 E12101 L11Ԥ%E 1101 2241211212: 91W]
`
`ME %%1 B]E°1(0|31“Ha*fl°_|”0|31 EMERB] 31%‘é— EEG} 1% A1112“;- E73145}.
`
`
`C)
`HEWCL-f’: 91%(§%+Er I1|25nafl C 1% XVESV‘OL%E_E 3% 31719} EH? €23 13-3141
`
`2.
`
`E0 %§L?flflz1flb15}(§¥ 1:
`
`7—1 ”SE-57351451, El?— 22 7—.1 éFEHEE).
`
`40—1022231
`
`(2014. 2. 12.)
`
`
`
`
`TWl;\'lll."1’I‘JI.H
`
`
`
`,r"
`
`40—1103884
`
`(2015. 5. 6.)
`
`18, 25. 28%
`
`I:
`
`c
`
`QEc
`
`-
`c
`
`pmggan
`
`HI 31340010322505“! 216101
`”13555333: W531fi83 53!}
`Hamaam$aflaa§
`
`

`

`13g”- F31Eg—:ga;It pagfiw
`1‘
`.L; .;.1:'-'.'n'.'
`,,1.l'5
`
`3-
`
`01111 011/111 71101 111% (i) 21111 1111111 £111, 111) $11 1111 111111111511 13
`
`W71},
`
`iii) :1 1191 88GB??? 11-11 12115111 1112 13— 211 £fl$fi¥§§~9€
`
`
`
`4.
`
`11114 01111111111: 1312110 11
`
`31—31111—1111111 11
`
`1011111111 1121 1111 E11111 13—1194131 @151 25—1:—
`
`11 521111111 111011 111111—:— 11.111;— %%*J—E0fl
`
`15111111011 1:111 1111: 1112311111 11} “:1-11 111:— 13— 11111—11 11 11% 21711 1111:— E1;
`
`713 0111.11 1111 111;- 111 11 11112111111—011 11111115 11111121111 111711 92 11
`
`9191:1111 My“ 11115611 5559.12 935 >
`
`'01
`
`111111 5211111 21111 111111 21—4—1114 1111;21:— 111111 a 111111 1111111 111
`
`111101113. szmqq. 011 111—31311 1111111711 1121 11—1—1111- 1111—117-11
`
`n;'\
`
`nnmm
`
`':E(a'
`
`npan
`
`2/3
`
`

`

`3:25
`
`_
`
`Hi 33%5é‘5-pjaggg,
`_'3_..-'m _ i.
`__
`‘=L'3;'w.:.
`
`7}. 01 47d. %i%:—aa} +94% my} 91% o] 2% 798M1%94 #9:]
`
`5-;
`
`re}
`
`L}. 01 w WLEB} 7%}? m7} ELM—E1 0] 2+3 593M1%94 $117171} 3;}
`
`“3-”?th ILUH%@.1—% $499194 VJMR’JOHFH 928% %“-’d*li
`
`6.
`
`”$71 E‘alfl‘ifl 3%011 EHfiFfi 201.7% 12% Fifi/T] HAM 3:172}% Q34$A171 “FEW,
`%$fl°fl flfioi flE—O] 912113 @fll—EX'E‘faGi 91%?“4171 Wfiqfi}.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`201741—27
`
`I“ 1022231
`
`S).
`
`20121;:1 09% 2432'
`
`20120050046
`
`2012B1 09% 04%
`
`2013ng1 117251. 2602'
`
`2013701 10726
`
`(Egg
`
`3:!a1‘5
`
`)
`
`0d
`
`D
`E‘
`
`20146 02% 0503‘
`
`El
`
`0101030209142“???
`
`20145 02°
`
`12
`
`E1HM=1§ 93%! 01301
`2-?- 1432 §@
`101 IIH
`
`EE
`
`63%E_a
`
`http://www.patent.go.kr/jsp/ka/oncert/recvdoc/ViewRechoc‘so
`
`1/1
`
`

`

`2017-11—27
`
`20145 01% 16%
`
`2014-0003638
`
`201315 07% 23%
`
`-lX
`
`20155 01% 19%|
`
`2015-0005284
`
`2015Bi 04%
`
`10%
`
`AD
`
`am
`
`01a
`
`VINCISTAR
`
`
`
`
`
`GEE]Emainc§-3$§EgJw.r\|Ma
`
`jJDgmH
`
`!thg
`
`In?“
`+TA
`
`59..X._.
`am35I,hfinHA
`MWMMMEQa
`
`mias
`
`010105,0209T4
`
`)
`
`432 %@ ‘2"
`
`8\E%|21 6
`
`Eééfl
`
`
`1jI
`
`LUI{La_x_,.\
`
`m$fi§w§$
`
`§-§m§%%
`
`Ekmgl%Uler.LIE:
`:MEQWMa¥gmflm
`ggmjfimg
`Egm,fl§%
`
`awe—n
`
`it:
`
`http://www.patentgo.kr/jsp/ka/oncert/recvdoc/ViewRechoc.so
`
`l/l
`
`

`

`fiEéflgfl m&m&mmm6
`
`(250) ~33Bd§
`(442) {sign—1‘22}
`
`40—2013—0110726
`20131311g2694
`
`(190) EH‘i‘l‘fli'ETafiGR)
`
`%E%E
`25(10¥})
`40—2012—0060046
`
`2012k=log~a24a
`
`35.
`
`v 2}
`% Kr}
`
`muw%7 muflm%m% %%%fi%@m)
`
`(731) %%?l
`
`iflrfl] as: gamma ya H120:
`
`mega-.2 (21:2:qu flag-PT 1432 aqfl%a‘:€%fl1
`
`6
`
`(740) Elm L31
`
`(511) zwyag/xmfi “ii/g7”—
`
`fig‘qugmw¢.Aflfl.
`9%
`31 gfiflfii, 31%,. BM.
`
`*flEfii.*%E@i.*Eifii.%q%.aHZ.fi%.
`fiflE,Ewfi.fl%%*%fl
`
`111257?-
`
`:2.%wa.
`mm. m.
`
`).
`
`i:
`
`”ABM? Will ”5%“
`
`91%
`
`“ARE5E1
`
`
`
`8—r3imam;
`
`

`

`”33% 3'. 35.71.
`
`40-20153-0005284
`
`(190) filfi‘ili'E-fiiiémR)
`gfigi
`18(1032r) 28(10xil) 25(10%)
`40-20141-0003638
`mmamamg
`
`(511) E“?-
`(210) @995:
`@m)%%%fl
`
`(260) %3_Hd§
`40-2015-0005284
`(442) any} 2015601§19§
`
`IWBW mmfiwfiwa wfl%_flflfi.m%%
`Um)%%fi
`
`il—Mfilfi “Emma Era} all-«:01
`
`L'H‘QEEE Qé'fiuioi RIC-173% 1432 %€fl-‘§‘-F—1E$Il
`(740) EHEJQJ
`
`6
`
`fll‘EE—iflfi‘fl
`aww : 7.4%?-
`
`(511) Xififléz/‘ffiiéfi/fi?‘
`
`1"] 18 fi
`
`7%. g 1% 1:2. Egg-71w? 9%. 01-63% 52.22. 0.63% 7%. 9%}. ow. We]. 92.11%] “h? %u}%
`:rL. 71%111 E' $5 ? éfl We“. 35%] Hwar7l‘%.
`”$21411
`013117-301 “:35. 7 ufl
`213’s}. ‘i’lifléxfl ”FF".
`‘31
`17mm my, 0&7 3.211 A'ITEHH". fiifl-ilzfl ammo] “:15, glam-3.12% 1W.
`
`#125 1?-
`
`21%, m1. Ex},
`
`2v? 28 7?
`
`I.
`
`7'
`
`c
`
`,
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`/’
`\‘wdrj ‘-
`
`2.2km» .. wax in a: ¢£z%%—(c+g%on w: 74% My 2.212ru}2_~521% %fl%(§“3%% ‘31
`EHHErE £191).
`
`’éhfififi diff 143'?
`
`amm Ah"; am *5.
`
`
`
`

`

`#363
`
`”SE 5 E #3 31
`
`40-2015-0005284
`
`
`
`VINCISTAR
`
`

`

`I
`
`2017- 11- 27-
`
`§a$5¢r MN 518 TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`W.
`
`W.
`
`4....,.,.....(....
`
`Hug-nut
`
`"WW-
`
`...u-fimm .: _¢.
`
`th
`
`HOME > men > ENSEME
`
`JUNK FOOD
`
`MN S/S TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSRD13PE)
`
`33mm 2 591909 —- 62,100E
`HEW; : 1.24093
`sign 1 my},
`5M1 JUNK FOOD
`ENE: JUNK FOOD [EPAEUEJW]
`‘3}
`: 2017—04—01
`
` we LOVE Juuxmoo «om
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”J fiuflé‘fll
`1IL;
`
`Q23
`finial:
`
`1'1 Eg’g‘a
`-7
`
`”Eli?!
`
`guy?- ““"“‘- '
`
`1. nlgim
`
`3. an?
`
`5‘ HIE:
`7‘ mam
`9. ms mum :1
`5M3?
`
`glam-gig rm
`
`managing m
`
`gaiwlma 1m
`
`,
`
`3'
`f _
`
`“
`
`.
`
`
`
`SF'H‘I
`
`2. wt
`
`4. 145m
`
`a, Mam; as m
`an Mum»
`a. mafia;
`
`Mme; 2m
`
`m—wmg in
`
`.
`,7
`maxim; 2M
`@k-f;—’3»\H*£%1 Bil
`
`351-555 19939 EH} LMW Erflél HE‘EE HIIE‘ I§fix§i 25312 5E EIEI—i. DCi‘lEfi
`9.“ 3001711 3N2} Efolfl'éi fll’fl‘ém Ei‘e's‘if ‘.‘_'E|1|_'lif|§1I ENE! fliall ilfil-IEL
`“Eli $5, EEEELJ fifth-71¢. ‘ilfilol £153. HIENI it. ‘KOIIEEJ '5 §E|$E fiEl-iolli‘il A}? “.94"— 21231
`EMIHIEEE 4.50001 7H9| 530% 'éEEEIO'I EDIEW EDHEELIEL
`
`S / S CREW NECK T-SHIRT
`
`http://junkfoodshop.comlshoplgandsigoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`1/7
`
`

`

`2017- 11- 27-
`
`Jail—$5”; MN SIS TEE__ NASA (JFMM1TSRO?3PE)
`
`- DETAIL —
`
`
`
`
`wuwuu
`
`plfmtru
`
`
`
`http:fljunkfoodshog).cum/shoplgoodsfgoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`2/7
`
`

`

`2017-11-21
`
`gin—21y MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSRO13PE)
`
`
`
`[Graphic - NASA]
`
`‘5: U ii K 3f? 0 0 Dig
`
`http:/J‘junkfoodshop.com/shoplgoodsfgoods_view.php?&goodsn0=852&category=002002
`
`3/7
`
`

`

`2017- 11- 27-
`
`gags—5+; MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSRO13PE)
`
`MERCURY
`
`http:/fjunkfoodshop.com/shopfgoodsigoodsfiview.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`4f?“
`
`

`

`1
`
`2017.11.27.
`
`EEEE’J MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`
`
`35! M”? ii
`- EH {GI I"JP-I'll ELIEI fl?! ’«léI-E— igfiéfl 530! I:l'IEI HE! EH 4* Rial-I51.
`
`- INFORMATION ‘-
`
`x L324 533 argg‘éwyxw x.)
`— fllwgfljfiifl 9: ME: ayxumm #- uax 2101 211‘:- 3:)
`- ERIE! EE Imam (awn: wow trauma)
`
`"ilfl : Cotton 100%
`
`'
`
`"
`
`" “-11“;
`
`2 PEPPER
`
`- Madein U.S.A
`
`— mama») : (xxxxonawcl
`
`~ 21mg 12017.4.
`
`~ 3-2 1% 71-5: : xx :1 x Aunts-x811: won 91%
`
`- A/sxm axxx: (#I‘E‘flfliIEWEI 023452—3430
`
`- SIZE -
`
`
`Q> fig:- *I'OIE <9
`SIZE
`71%Effi
`5
`50
`M
`52
`L
`54
`
`1.13%! 0I
`20
`21
`21.5
`
`3(9'13I‘31
`17
`13
`18
`
`OIDIIEOI
`12
`12
`12.5
`
`Malawi 2cm
`%71?-3’
`7!
`73
`74
`
`- %§19411 11:5 tggufi mar I '2r InflEQI 2:113} egg 4; Swing,
`~ ELIEIQI HZ! EEE PC #1210“ MEI Z—fiiull 310W 913$? 5' fiLI EI.
`
`http:Hjunkfoodshop.comlshopigoodsfgoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=002002
`
`5/7
`
`

`

`q
`
`2017.11.27.
`
`EE¥E§ MN 818 TEE_ NASA (JFMM1TSR013PE)
`
`SHIPPING GUIDE
`
`
`|> HIIE‘EEILII
`- Inga“: : EIIEJIHII
`~ HIIfi-"IEJ'E III-Ian21III: I:342% 2-42» 292%
`£1,422: 2 ..was; III—12.2: HII$°I llfi-‘I'II 2 IIaLILII
`~ III22Ia. 2:2 $222.22 2222._WHII’EHPWFI-HI 2I:LI:I.I
`
`- RE 1% I “Ié'w% WIPE! E: 1744515 3’1! “4‘3" #960} fIl—IEI.
`-9339}: WEI?! 17"”1‘IIIIEEI‘I'5. ME: I ’IIIHJIEI—E‘I 0! ?§-‘u‘- EIIHIIflI-g-E 317-I'Ifi’Il-KI $5M #IDII'ILIEI.
`(€54 3-3HI 500% 52.31137“ BIOII SIC-3M EIHEJIHII ’iI-Iivfi .IalII-I-IIIIL“l EIUI.
`EI EM OI-EIH I‘.‘ 3- iflII E 1'2 3%HI 2.500%? III-53M ’aIiIP-I “III”! EIIIINI'E IELIEIJ
`
`D EIEJAI {EIQIAI‘EI
`-IIIImIagIJIvI2:T.- $22223.12: 212 “ITHIOI III“ 2:12.220213$I:I1IIIOI DIEI¥¢9II$LIEI
`~22: 2.2222: 2222M; 2422Mia—36104 ELIIzT-JIJIHIELIEI.
`
`I> EEJII' “3% {Ia-3|
`- #2393 flIEI fiEI-ESGII RSI! I1!“ 114??— JEN:I“ Jéflél ?I’II It ’I‘JI'IJHI III“ {HEIDI EIIIEIIHIII I5389938M!
`E‘PSII —”r‘JII7| IjI‘I—Jl-IIII.
`- HJ$N¥ --=I‘-'Il3: [AifigquI ‘39-? ”3:.{Ir-1'74 EDIEI‘E 3% (#IEEDIIEDJCI I
`"III-.4. I AI‘BI‘w'EH :IEI‘EI-‘I’L $6“; GIT.
`I 3% (#IEEDIIE'IIJEII I325. EWI‘QEI I
`
`
`
`
`EEQE I-ZLU‘IIELJ-‘AIIIJJN
`
`I"
`
`MN TEE_JOE COOL ‘
`LIVING IT
`UPIJFMJQTSROOIIWH)
`53.50021
`nn-
`u
`I
`"flan-I LEL‘IIEI'I
`i
`
`EEIILII JéIxI-EI ’SI‘E-oM '- MN TELBATMAN
`MN TEE_BATMAN
`MN SIS TELJEAN-MICHEL
`3] MUIEMM I‘: wN'
`YOU COMPLETE
`BASQUIATIJFMJETSROQNVI HEROIJFMJITSROOSBKI
`!_BATMAN
`MEIJFMJQTSROOZWHI
`CAM
`MIZT
`I
`58,500fl
`58.500fl
`,
`53 500%,!
`....
`'
`I - II [III
`.,
`.. 35-40“
`-m- mum
`--
`I:-
`
`
`
`
`1 ”1’
`
`t-
`
`IIIII’EIII ”SW-3&5 2.500%! @LIEI. (EIIHSDEXI ‘a-‘Ifl-XII’AE HI$H|7I¥7ISJ* 9'fiI-IEI150.000%I 0M3 710M FIRIIH-EE—E’n'I-I
`' CI.
`'
`.2— 222 212% III—EIIIIILIII 2— 404m iREILIEI WISE-.12 26ml 72%- EN; ILIIHIIDI EIEIE'II gem: I—IEI.
`211? smog: I~32II=ILIcI Ima éIILI IIIIMI 22II a: n2 :Wfl $ 12 :IEI.[IIII§OII§°AE wAIEII¥EEMIOII 2:2 I-r-Eu
`' 2m 224222 I23 ngaz :XIOIFI mayI 21:44 I 1
`3-:— éIé‘IEI $11; HII$ 7IE$§2~39‘ ELIE! III-3‘ FIé-AUIEI 1% 3-2-2:- fiE aw 14:14-35“ QI“ 31H aOI 7%? 311% EIDIEILIEI.
`”(9.01%5J‘3'3I-g‘37la’1lfiAII9I°IDI31Eda$fl§371¥filLIELI
`
`131mlEI'I-I H; I Area. In: I .III.
`h517940|LHgLIIzI_
`- 3% éI‘lI‘EfiI 2%”II3 EI§$EA?J
`- IE2 EMtIacIIIIWI “LE H32 {#3 J‘IKI IHIE AIOIIE “4 OILIIEIE mi 24 EF-éol £3I—é—EILIEI.
`. IIEIJI Jé‘n 94—”: ”WI *Jag— IL" 31210“ 9|? 31%. EI-a— EZI’IIM'I IIHIstIIE “EIéIAIOI EILEEIIIII‘TPI =le UHISEIE EHIBI)
`- $3.41? gg§fl£ifl IEAI 23232122 E IIIIEM AIEEE 3‘FHOI “I553 # RI‘LIEI.
`
`WHIfI % 1H1}$EKII4$I%IIE:0I.E§.AIOIZ “IEIIEJ-Ié‘ SrOIII: III’EIEE a? 3FINE EQIILII’EJIELIIEIE may ELI Hing-OI
`. 1&3?IE}? :I‘ZIOIIM ’i‘EISIfli‘II-I Ig-EEIDI E23¥0IIE EEHHIE- 77IISHEIE BE 92' EI=§0| ESP}? ELIEI.
`' LIKE.
`. #3.”:I-fi-1Ihg-C’I 5% HIE 3.: E— QEPI“It III-1‘- «22' fig: EIEI 3-3- 7 VII fllé A| III-$1 32 IL-E—OI EJI— ’éIEELI. 35H tII.=II—|EI.
`93$- EJI’E‘EEI 235%.11'? 3WIEKII-E— .31qu EHHI’EEI §$~Es IIIEIEI EAHEI 3:24ng PIE mil. IiIECII EJIgfiI? amIELI
`'74 2—2-2 gI-ggIIIIIgL-LIE 12 2.IIIAIE.
`
`IEJI-g— EI
`
`“le Hth'i.‘
`
`mfiA L‘J:‘;I|”HrIrFI‘I.‘VI'tH
`
`nIIIquII
`
`httpzlfjunkfoodshop.comlshop/goodslgoods_view.php?&goodsno=852&category=0020f}2
`
`6f?
`
`

`

`29”- 11- 27-
`
`fifl—fiiEM MN SIS TEE_ NASA (JFMMTTSR013PE)
`
`CUSTOMER
`GEN