throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA380376
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`11/24/2010
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Citizenship
`
`UNITED STATES
`
`Name
`Entity
`Address
`
`Jose A Lugo
`Individual
`20 Snyder Avenue
`Brooklyn, NY 11226
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`Humberto Rubio, Jr.
`Rubio & Associates, P.A.
`8950 SW 74 Ct., # 1804
`Miami, FL 33156
`UNITED STATES
`hrubio@rubiolegal.com
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`85056706
`11/24/2010
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`
`11/16/2010
`12/16/2010
`
`Lugo's Hair
`150 East 44 St 26a
`New York, NY 10017
`UNITED STATES
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 044. First Use: 2010/01/01 First Use In Commerce: 2010/01/01
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Hair replacement, hair addition, and hair
`extension services
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Deceptiveness
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.r.l.Fraud
`
`Trademark Act section 2(a)
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`808 F.2d 46, 1 USPQ2d 1483 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
`
`Marks Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application
`No.
`Registration Date
`
`85144506
`
`NONE
`
`Word Mark
`
`LUGO'S
`
`Application Date
`
`10/04/2010
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`

`

`Design Mark
`
`Description of
`Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`U.S. Application
`No.
`Registration Date
`
`Word Mark
`Design Mark
`
`NONE
`
`Class 026. First use: First Use: 1976/06/13 First Use In Commerce: 1976/06/13
`Hair products and accessories, namely, wigs, hair pieces, add-on hair
`accessories constructed primarily of human hair, hair extensions, hair braids,
`hair weaves, hair ribbons and hair ornaments in the form of combs. Synthetic
`hair
`
`85144524
`
`Application Date
`
`10/04/2010
`
`NONE
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`LUGO HAIR CENTER THE MECCA OF HAIR
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 026. First use: First Use: 1976/06/13 First Use In Commerce: 1976/06/13
`Hair products and accessories, namely, wigs, hair pieces, add-on hair
`accessories constructed primarily of human hair, hair extensions, hair braids,
`hair weaves, hair ribbons and hair ornaments in the form of combs. Synthetic
`hair
`
`U.S. Application
`No.
`Registration Date
`
`Word Mark
`
`85144575
`
`Application Date
`
`10/04/2010
`
`NONE
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`LUGO HAIR CENTER THE MECCA OF HAIR
`
`NONE
`
`

`

`Design Mark
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`The mark consists of a woman's head and face with somewhat wavy hair long
`enough to cover her neck and portion of her shoulder/back. She is facing north-
`east and has her head somewhat slanted towards her back. To the right of the
`woman's figure the words "Lugo Hair Center" and "The Mecca of Hair" appear.
`Class 026. First use: First Use: 1976/06/13 First Use In Commerce: 1976/06/13
`hair products and accessories, namely, wigs, hair pieces, add-on hair
`accessories constructed primarily of human hair, hair extensions, hair braids,
`hair weaves, hair ribbons and hair ornaments in the form of combs. Synthetic
`hair
`
`U.S. Application
`No.
`Registration Date
`
`85177151
`
`NONE
`
`Word Mark
`Design Mark
`
`LUGO HAIR CENTER
`
`Application Date
`
`11/15/2010
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`Related
`Proceedings
`
`Attachments
`
`NONE
`
`Class 035. First use: First Use: 1976/06/13 First Use In Commerce: 1976/06/13
`Retail and distributorship services in the field of hair products and accessories
`
`Opposition No. 91196840
`
`85144506#TMSN.jpeg ( 1 page )( bytes )
`85144524#TMSN.jpeg ( 1 page )( bytes )
`85144575#TMSN.jpeg ( 1 page )( bytes )
`85177151#TMSN.jpeg ( 1 page )( bytes )
`Opposition Lugos 11-24-10.pdf ( 5 pages )(91725 bytes )
`Proof of Service 11-24-10.pdf ( 1 page )(53154 bytes )
`
`

`

`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/Humberto Rubio/
`Humberto Rubio, Jr.
`11/24/2010
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the matter of trademark application Serial No. 85056706
`For the mark: LUGO’S HAIR
`Published in the Official Gazette on: November 16, 2010
`
`---------------------------------------------------)
`JOSE ANTONIO LUGO SR.
` )
`
`
`Opposer,
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`LUGO’S HAIR
`
`
` )
`
`
`Applicant.
`
` )
`---------------------------------------------------)
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Opposition No. ________________
`
`
`
`
`
`JOSE ANTONIO LUGO, SR., (hereinafter “Opposer”), an individual residing in New York,
`
`with a principal address, 20 Snyder Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11226 believes that it will be damaged by
`
`registration of the mark shown in U.S. Application Serial No. 85056706 filed by LUGO’S HAIR
`
`(hereinafter “Applicant”), on June 7, 2010. The application was published in the Official Gazette on
`
`November 16, 2010. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1063, by and through undersigned counsel, Opposer
`
`opposes the registration of this mark and as grounds alleges:
`
`1.
`
`Opposer, Jose Antonio Lugo, Sr., is an individual residing in New York, NY. For many
`
`years Opposer, its related companies and licensees (hereinafter “Related Companies”) have used the
`
`trademarks LUGO’S, LUGO HAIR CENTER THE MECCA OF HAIR, LUGO HAIR CENTER
`
`THE MECCA OF HAIR and DESIGN and LUGO HAIR CENTER (hereinafter “Opposer’s Marks”)
`
`in commerce in connection with hair products and related goods and services.
`
`2.
`
`Many years prior to the filing of U.S. Application Serial No. 85056706, which is the
`
`subject of this opposition, Opposer adopted and began using LUGO’S, LUGO HAIR CENTER and
`
`Opposer’s Marks in commerce.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`3.
`
`Opposer and Related Companies are and have been engaged in the sale and marketing
`
`of highly related goods and services to those recited by the Applicant in its application since a time
`
`prior to any date of use by the Applicant.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer and Related Companies are and have been engaged in the sale and marketing
`
`of hair products and accessories, namely, wigs, hair pieces, add-on hair accessories constructed
`
`primarily of human hair, hair extensions, hair braids, hair weaves, hair ribbons and hair ornaments in
`
`the form of combs in international class 026 under Opposer’s Marks. Opposer and Related
`
`Companies have also been engaged in the retail and distributorship services in the field of hair
`
`products and accessories in international class 035.
`
`5.
`
`Opposer is the owner of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 85144506 for “LUGO’S”,
`
`pending U.S. Application Serial No. 85144524 for “Lugo Hair Center The Mecca of Hair” pending
`
`U.S. Application Serial No. 85144575 for “Lugo Hair Center The Mecca of Hair” a stylized and/or
`
`with design mark and pending U.S. Application Serial No. 85177151 for “Lugo Hair Center”
`
`(collectively referred to as “Opposer’s Marks”).
`
`6.
`
` Opposer has used Opposer’s Marks in commerce and has acquired considerable and
`
`valuable goodwill and recognition for its marks. By virtue of its longstanding use in commerce and
`
`extensive advertising, Opposer’s Marks have become well-known in the relevant industry and the
`
`public has come to associate Opposer’s Marks with Opposer’s hair products and related goods and
`
`services.
`
`7.
`
`Furthermore, Opposer has a first date of use prior to Applicant’s alleged first use and
`
`owns substantial use-based rights in and to Opposer’s Marks. Opposer’s first use in commerce dates
`
`back to 1976.
`
`8.
`
`According to the U.S. Application Serial No. 85056706, Applicant is a New York
`
`Corporation located in New York with address 150 East 44 Street, 26a, New York, NY 10017.
`
`However, upon information and belief and pursuant to a brief review of the public records kept by
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`the Secretary of the Department of State of New York, Applicant does not seem to be an active New
`
`York corporation.
`
`9.
`
`Applicant owns U.S. Application Serial No. 85056706 and seeks to register the mark
`
`LUGO’S HAIR for international class 044 to distinguish hair replacement, hair addition, and hair
`
`extension services.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant has been applying its confusingly identical
`
`mark to similar goods and services, including hair products, hair services, hair retail and
`
`distributorship services.
`
`11.
`
`Applicant’s mark, if not identical is confusingly similar to Opposer’s Marks and is
`
`likely, when applied to the goods of the Applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake or
`
`deceive. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d). Applicant’s mark makes a highly similar commercial impression to
`
`Opposer’s Marks due to its identical sound and appearance. The overall commercial impression of
`
`Applicant’s mark, when applied to the same or similar goods, would cause confusion or be likely to
`
`cause confusion, mistake or deception.
`
`12.
`
`Additionally, upon information and belief, the intended customer markets for
`
`Opposer’s and Related Companies’ products and Applicant’s are likely to overlap.
`
`13.
`
`Applicant is not entitled to use or register as a trademark LUGO’S HAIR for which it
`
`seeks registration in its U.S. Application Serial No. 85056706, either prior to its Application or on
`
`June 7, 2010, the date of filing of said application, or on November 16, 2010 the date of publication
`
`thereof in the Official Gazette.
`
`14.
`
`Applicant is not the rightful owner of the above referenced application. At the time of
`
`filing, Applicant was fully aware that Opposer was the rightful owner of Opposer’s Marks.
`
`15.
`
`Jose Lugo, a/k/a Jose Lugo, Jr. is the son of Opposer and a former employee of
`
`Opposer and/or Related Companies.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`16.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant and or correspondent in the Application subject
`
`of this dispute is intimately related (or one in the same) with Jose Lugo, a/k/a Jose Lugo, Jr.
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant is intimately related (or is one in the same) to
`
`the Applicant of the trademark LUGO’S Application Serial No. 85006767, which Application is also
`
`the subject of an Opposition – Opposition No. 91196840 (for similar reasons and arguments). Such
`
`Opposition is in default stage as Applicant failed to answer (a Motion for Default Judgment has been
`
`filed).
`
`18.
`
`Applicant knowingly committed fraud in the declaration when filing the application
`
`that is the subject of this opposition, by stating that it was entitled to use such mark in commerce.
`
`19.
`
`Opposer has been using Opposer’s Marks since 1976 (many years prior to Applicant’s
`
`first use and to Applicant’s application that is the subject of this opposition) and Opposer’s Marks are
`
`known among consumers and have acquired goodwill.
`
`20.
`
`If Applicant were permitted to register LUGO’S HAIR for the goods/services listed in
`
`Applicant’s application, customers and relevant trade would likely be confused as to the source,
`
`sponsorship, or affiliation of such goods and services, thereby causing damage and injury to Opposer.
`
`Persons already familiar with Opposer’s products and services would be likely to be confused as to
`
`whether Applicant’s goods and services are authorized or sponsored by Opposer and such confusion
`
`in trade would result in damages to Opposer. Any defect, objection or fault on the part of Applicant
`
`would likely also affect Opposer.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that the opposition be sustained and Applicant’s application be
`
`refused and denied.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`This Notice of Opposition is being filed electronically through the Electronic System for Trademark
`
`Trials and Appeals on this 24th day of November, 2010 and the fee required is submitted
`
`simultaneously therewith.
`
`
`
`Opposer hereby designates the undersigned as applicant's representative upon whom notice or
`
`process in the proceedings affecting this procedure may be served.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
`Attorneys for Opposer
`8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804
`Miami, FL 33156
`Tel: (786) 220-2061
`Fax: (786) 220-2062
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Humberto Rubio/ .
`Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on November 24th, 2010, I served the foregoing document described as
`Notice of Opposition on the interested party in the action at its last known address by placing a true
`and correct copy in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully paid in the United States Mail, via
`Certified Mail as follows:
`
`LUGO’S HAIR
`150 East 44 Street, 26a,
`New York, NY 10017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAW FIRM OF RUBIO & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
`Attorneys for Opposer
`8950 SW 74 Ct., Suite 1804
`Miami, FL 33156
`Tel: (786) 220-2061
`Fax: (786) 220-2062
`
`
`
` /Humberto Rubio/____
`Humberto Rubio, Jr., Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket