throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA407004
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`05/04/2011
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91195378
`Defendant
`Sulzer Mixpac AG
`CHRISTOPHER S. ADKINS
`K&L GATES LLP
`1601 K STREET NW
`WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1600
`UNITED STATES
`chicago.trademarks@klgates.com, christopher.adkins@klgates.com
`Other Motions/Papers
`Christopher S. Adkins
`chicago.trademarks@klgates.com, michael.murphy@klgates.com,
`christopher.adkins@klgates.com
`/Christopher S. Adkins/
`05/04/2011
`Sulzer App 77848301.PDF ( 6 pages )(157470 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`In the Matter of Application No. 77848301
`Filed: October 14, 2009
`For the Mark: Blue Mixing Tip Configuration in International Class 10
`Published in the Official Gazette: June 1, 2010
`
`Pac-Dent International, Inc.,
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Sulzer Mixpac AG,
`
`1
`
`Applicant.
`
`g/\./\./\./\/\/\/\./\_/\/
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`Opposition No. 91195378
`
`OPPOSER’S WITHDRAWAL OF OPPOSITION I
`
`Registrant Sulzer Mixpac AG (“Sulzer” or “Applicant”), by its undersigned counsel,
`
`K&L Gates LLP, respectfully submits Opposer’s Withdrawal of Opposition of Applicant’s mark.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Sulzer filed suit against Opposer based upon trademark and patent infringement in the
`
`United States District Court Southern District of New York (“District Court”) in Sulzer Mixpac
`
`USA, Inc. and Sulzer Mixpac AG vs. Pac—Dent International Inc., Pac-Dent, Inc., Pac—Dent'
`
`International (Suzhou), Ltd. and Daniel Y. Wang, No. 09-Civ 10430~(DAB) on March 18, 2010
`
`(the “Civil Action”).
`
`In response, Opposer
`
`filed an Opposition against Applicant’s Blue Mixing Tip,
`
`Application No. 77848301, with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). Because the
`
`DC~9206457 v1
`
`

`
`outcome of the Civil Action had a bearing on the Opposition, Applicant filed a Motion to Stay
`
`the Opposition and the Board granted Applicant’s motion.
`
`WITHDRAWAL OF OPPOSITION
`
`II.
`
`Opposer now withdraws its Opposition. Applicant hereby submits Opposer’s
`
`Withdrawal of the Opposition which is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`WHEREFORE, Applicant
`
`respectfully requests
`
`that the Board enter Opposer’s
`
`Withdrawal of its Opposition and dismiss the proceeding in App1icant’s favor.
`
`Dated: May 3, 2011.
`
`SULZER MIXPAC AG
`
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`One of Its '3 torneys
`
`Michael T. Murphy, Esq.
`Christopher S. Adkins, Esq.
`K&L GATES LLP
`1601 K Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20006-1600
`(312) 807-4272
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Served Via Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s electronic system (ESTTA) to the following.
`
`Philip H. Gottfried
`Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, LLP
`Attorneys for Opposer _
`90 Park Avenue, 21“ Floor
`New York, New York 10016
`(212) 336-8000
`
`Applicant by first—class mail sending the same to the following:
`
`Arnold I. Kalman, Esq.
`Law Offices of Arnold I. Kalman
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`245 South Hutchinson Street
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19107-5723
`(215) 829-9613
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Michael T. Murphy, Esq.
`Christopher S. Adkins, Esq.
`Attorneys for Applicant
`K&L GATES LLP
`1601 K Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20006-1600
`(312) 807-4272
`
` Michl T. M ; hy
`
`naichaelrnumy @klgates.corn
`
`Dated: Washington, DC
`
` ,2011
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ .x
`
`PAC-DENT INTERNATIONAL, INC,
`
`OPPOSSY»
`
`V-
`SULZER MIXPAC AG,
`
`'
`
`_
`Applicant.
`_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X
`
`Honorable Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`Sir:
`
`Opposition No. 91 195378
`WITHDRAWAL OF OPPOSITION
`
`‘ The above—identified Opposer hereby withdraws the above—identif1ed Opposition, which has I
`currently been suspended in View of the existence of an Action which had been pending in the
`
`United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sulzer Mixpac USA,
`
`Inc. and Sulzer Mixpac AG v. Pac-Dent International, Inc., Pac-Dent, Ina, Pac-Dent
`
`International (Suzhou), Ltd. and Daniel Y. Wang, in view of such Action itself having been
`
`terminated.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York, New York
`March 17, 2011
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN, LLP
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`90 Park Avenue, 21“ Floor
`New York, New York 10016
`(212) 336—8000
`
`
` Philip H. Gottfri d
`
`47908 1 .1
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`day of
`It is hereby certified that the undersigned has this 4
`served a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing WITHDRAWAL OF OPPO ITION on
`Applicant by e-mail and first—c1ass mail by sending the same to the following:
`
`, 2011
`
`Michael T. Murphy, Esq.
`K&L Gates LLP
`
`1601 K Street, N.W.,
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 778-9176
`Michae1.rnurphy@k1gates.com
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Arnold I. Kahnan, Esq.
`Law Offices of Arnold I. Kalman
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`245 South
`
`
`
`amo1dkalman@arno1dka1man1aw.com
`
`Dated: Ph' adelphia, PA
`'2.
`____, 2011
`
`47908 I .1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket