throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA219503
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`06/23/2008
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91184751
`Plaintiff
`Mile, Inc. and L.D. Management Company
`Jeremy J. Thornton
`Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A.
`250 West Street
`Columbus, OH 43215
`UNITED STATES
`jthornton@szd.com
`Other Motions/Papers
`Jeremy J. Thornton
`jthornton@szd.com
`/Jeremy J. Thornton/
`06/23/2008
`LDCS - Motion to Suspend (Application No. 77-303,797) (H1264484).PDF ( 60
`pages )(1856249 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MILE, INC.
`
`and
`
`L.D. MANAGEMENT COMPANY
`
`Opposers,
`
`v.
`
`PRIDE MANAGEMENT, INC.
`
`Applicant
`
`%§/§/%/&/\./\)\2§/%/§/§/%§/\—/A
`
`Opposition No. 91184751
`
`Application No. 77/303,797
`Mark: LIONSDEN CABARET &
`
`STEAKHOUSE
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND
`
`Opposers, Mile,
`
`Inc. and L.D. Management Company move to suspend this
`
`proceeding until further notice from Opposers pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.117(a). The
`
`grounds for this motion are that an action styled Mile, Inc. v. Pride Management, Inc.,
`
`No. 0:08-cv-60509-CMA is pending in the United States District Court, Southern District
`
`of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division ("the Florida Action") involving issues common to
`
`this opposition proceeding.
`
`In particular,
`
`the Florida Action involves the issue of
`
`whether Pride Management, Inc.'s use of the mark that is the subject matter of the instant
`
`Application conflicts with Mile, Inc.’s trademark, among others, owned by Opposers. A
`
`true and accurate copy of the complaint in the Florida Action is attached hereto as Exhibit
`
`{Hl2S42‘)2 I
`
`)
`
`

`
`1. The Board should exercise its discretion to suspend this proceeding, because the
`
`resolution of the Florida Action could resolve some or all of the issues in this proceeding,
`
`which resolution could be binding on the Board.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: June 23, 2008
`
`Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A.
`250 West Street
`
`Columbus, OH 43215
`
`Telephone: (614)462-1077
`Facsimile: (614) 224-3998
`
`Attorneys for Opposers
`
`(Hl254292 l
`
`)
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that the foregoing MOTION TO SUSPEND is being deposited on
`June 23, 2008 with the United States Postal Service as first class mail, postage prepaid,
`upon the following counsel of record for Applicant:
`
`Edward M. Livingston
`THE LIVINGSTON FIRM
`
`963 Trail Terrace Drive
`
`NAPLES FL 34103-2329
`
`Phone: 239-262-8502
`
`Fax: 239-261-3773
`
`5-L
`
`Jer
`
`y J.
`
`nton
`
`(Hl254292 l
`
`)
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv—60509-CMA Document 1
`\—V
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2008
`\i
`
`Page ‘I of 55
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`L.D. MANAGEMENT COMPANY
`110 East Wilson Bridge Road,
`Worthington, Ohio 43085,
`
`:
`:
`'
`
`MAGISTRATE J'U‘DGI
`BROWN
`
`.
`:
`,
`
`9 8 -.
`
`' Case N .
`
`_
`
`-
`
`'
`
`ClV”ALTO’lllC“A'
`.\
`I
`'
`"
`5 0 9
`
`
`
`
`
`cunsncz mono,
`CLERK u.s. over.
`3.0.
`_ . ,1 Lg’-D.
`
`:
`
`:
`
`Judge
`
`MILE, INC.,
`110 East Wilson Bridge Road
`Worthington, Ohio 43085,
`
`*
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`PRIDE MANAGEMENT, INC.,
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`BEE LINE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`CHARLES H. VEIGLE, SR.,
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`CHARLES H. VEIGLE, JR.,
`1042 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`JAMES VEIGLE,
`401 SR 436,
`
`Casselberry, Florida 32746,
`
`[Hll930022)
`
`

`
`Case 0:08-cv—60509—CMA Document 1
`
`Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2008
`\/
`
`Page 29 of 55
`
`1.
`
`Such other relief as the court may deem appropriate.
`
`
`
`Lee & Amtzis, P.L.
`5550 Glades Road, Suite 401
`Boca Raton, Florida 33431
`
`Telephone: 561-981-9988
`Facsimile: 561-981-9980
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs L.D. Management Company
`and Mile, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`T. Earl LeVere (Oh. Sup. Ct. 0063515)
`Jeremy J. Thornton (Oh. Sup. Ct. 0076907)
`Schottenstein Zox & Dunn Co., LPA
`250 West Street
`
`Columbus, Ohio 43215
`
`Telephone: 614-462-2700
`Facsimile: 614-228-4847
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`1, Michael F. Moran, being first duly sworn and cautioned, hereby verify and affirm
`
`under penalty of perjury that the facts alleged in the foregoing Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint are
`
`true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
`
`
`
`
`ichael F. Moran
`Chief Executive Offic r,
`
`
`
`L.D. Management Company
`
`Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this
`
`IE
`day of April 2008.
`
`77512142,,
`
`NOTARY PUBLIC
`
`(Hll9300Z2)
`
`€
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case NO.
`
`Judge
`
`L.D. MANAGEMENT COMPANY
`
`110 East Wilson Bridge Road,
`Worthington, Ohio 43085,
`
`and
`
`MILE, INC.,
`110 East Wilson Bridge Road,
`Worthington, Ohio 43085,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`PRIDE MANAGEMENT, INC.,
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`BEE LINE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
`
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`CHARLES H. VEIGLE, SR.,
`
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`CHARLES H. VEIGLE, JR.,
`
`1042 Shadowmoss Circle,
`
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`JAMES VEIGLE,
`
`401 SR 436,
`Casselberry, Florida 32746,
`
`{HI]930022)
`
`

`
`and
`
`NANCY VOEGTLIN,
`
`401 SR 436,
`Casselberry, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`KATHLEEN S. GREENE,
`
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`and
`
`KATHY S. VEIGLE,
`
`711 Shadowmoss Circle,
`Lake Mary, Florida 32746,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`Now come Plaintiffs L.D. Management Company and Mile, Inc. (collectively “The
`
`Lion’s Den”), by their undersigned attorneys and,
`
`for
`
`their verified complaint against
`
`Defendants, hereby allege and aver as follows upon actual knowledge with respect to themselves
`
`and their own acts and upon infomiation and belief as to all other matters:
`
`Nature of the Case
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair
`
`competition, and cybersquatting arising under federal, state, and common law. The Lion’s Den,
`
`a leading provider of adult retail entertainment, brings this action against Defendants Pride
`
`Management, lnc., Bee Line Entertainment, lnc., Charles H. Veigle, Sr., Charles H. Veigle, Jr.,
`
`James Veigle, Nancy Voegtlin, Kathleen S. Greene, and Kathy S. Veigle (individually and
`
`collectively “Defendants”) because Defendants have knowingly misappropriated The Lion’s
`
`Den’s name and trademarks for use in their competing “Lion’s Den Cabaret & Steakhouse”
`
`establishment.
`
`{Hl]93002.2)
`
`2
`
`

`
`The Parties
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff L.D. Management Company (“L.D. Management”)
`
`is an Ohio
`
`corporation with its principal place of business at 110 East Wilson Bridge Road, Worthington,
`
`Ohio 43085. Plaintiff operates nearly 40 adult entertaimnent venues and retail stores under its
`
`distinctive THE LION’S DEN® and lion imagery marks. Plaintiff L.D. Management has
`
`business
`
`locations
`
`in sixteen states
`
`as well
`
`as
`
`a national online business via its
`
`LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.com Internet websites.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff Mile, Inc. (“Mile”) is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of
`
`business at 110 East Wilson Bridge Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085. Plaintiff Mile is the
`
`registered owner and licensor of certain of the trademarks at issue herein.
`
`4.
`
`Defendants, on information and belief,
`
`intend to open an adult entertainment
`
`venue at 1350 SW 2nd Street, Pompano Beach, Florida 33069 under the name LIONS DEN
`
`CABARET & STEAKHOUSE
`
`[sic]
`
`and
`
`are
`
`operating
`
`an
`
`Internet website
`
`at
`
`LionsDenCabaret.com.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Pride Management, Inc.
`
`is a Florida corporation with its principal
`
`place of business at 711 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida 32746.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Bee Line Entertainment, Inc. is a Florida corporation with its principal
`
`place of business at 711 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida 32746.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Sr.
`
`is, upon infonnation and belief, a Florida
`
`resident whose last known address is 711 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida 32746.
`
`Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Sr. is, upon infonnation and belief, a director and vice president of
`
`Pride Management, Inc. Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Sr. is, upon information and belief, a
`
`{H} 193002.22)
`
`3
`
`

`
`director of Bee Line Entertainment, Inc. Upon information and belief, Defendant Charles H.
`
`Veigle, Sr. is married to Defendant Kathleen S. Greene.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Jr.
`
`is, upon information and belief, a Florida
`
`resident whose last known address is 1042 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida 32746.
`
`Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Jr.
`
`is, upon information and belief, a director and president of
`
`Pride Management, Inc. Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Jr. is, upon information and belief, a
`
`director of Bee Line Entertainment, Inc.
`
`9.
`
`Defendant James Veigle is, upon information and belief, a Florida resident whose
`
`last known address is 401 E. State Road, 436 Casselberry, Florida 32707. Defendant James
`
`Veigle is, upon information and belief, a director of Bee Line Entertainment, Inc.
`
`10.
`
`Defendant Nancy Voegtlin is, upon information and belief, a Florida resident
`
`whose last known address is 401 E. State Road, 436 Casselberry, Florida 32707. Defendant
`
`Nancy Voegtlin is, upon information and belief, secretary of Bee Line Entertainment, Inc.
`
`11.
`
`Defendant Kathleen S. Greene is, upon information and belief, a Florida resident
`
`whose last known address is 711 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida
`
`32746. Upon
`
`information and belief, Defendant Greene is married to Defendant Charles H. Veigle, Sr.
`
`12.
`
`Defendant Kathy S. Veigle is, upon information and belief, a Florida resident
`
`whose last known address is 711 Shadowmoss Circle, Lake Mary, Florida 32746. Defendant
`
`Kathy S. Veigle is, upon information and belief, secretary and treasurer of Pride Management,
`
`Inc. Defendant Kathy S. Veigle is, upon information and belief, secretary of Bee Line
`
`Entertainment, Inc.
`
`{HH93002 2 )
`
`4
`
`

`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`13.
`
`This action arises under the federal Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.; the
`
`Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Fla. Stat. § 501.204 (“FDUTPA”); and the
`
`common law of Florida. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1121, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1338(a), 1338(b), and 1367. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`l338(b) and 1367, this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over The Lion’s Den’s state law
`
`claims because those claims are substantially related to The Lion’s Den’s federal Lanham Act
`
`claims.
`
`14.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because each of the
`
`Defendants resides in the State of Florida. Additionally, each of the Defendants has had
`
`substantial contacts with Florida sufficient to justify their having to respond to this action here.
`
`The Lion’s Den is being harmed in this District, Defendants are doing business in this District,
`
`and specific actions about which The Lion’s Den complains have taken place in this District.
`
`15.
`
`Venue is proper in the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1391(a) and (b) because all of the Defendants reside within the State of Florida and at least one
`
`of the Defendants resides in this judicial district. Additionally, a substantial part of the events or
`
`omissions giving rise to the Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this judicial district. Pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1391(0), venue is also proper in this judicial district as to all claims asserted against
`
`Defendants Pride Management, Inc. and Bee Line Entertainment, Inc. because these corporate
`
`defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district.
`
`The Lion’s Den and its Retail Adult Entertainment Services
`
`16.
`
`The Lion’s Den is a leading provider of retail adult entertainment goods and
`
`services throughout the United States.
`
`(H1193002.2 )
`
`5
`
`

`
`17.
`
`Through its retail outlets, The Lion’s Den sells a variety of adult-oriented
`
`products including, for example, adult videos, books, periodicals, novelties, and intimate apparel.
`
`18.
`
`Since opening its first store in 1971, The Lion’s Den has endeavored to create an
`
`opportunity for interested adults to purchase adult-oriented materials in a safe and non-
`
`judgmental environment. The Lion’s Den has established a reputation for offering quality
`
`products and for having a professional, courteous, and knowledgeable sales staff, while
`
`protecting the privacy and discretion of its customers.
`
`19.
`
`Recognizing the mature nature of its products and services, The Lion’s Den is
`
`actively involved in ensuring that the adult-oriented products and services it sells are available
`
`exclusively to adults. For example, The Lion’s Den is a corporate member and sponsor of the
`
`Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP), which is a non-profit organization
`
`dedicated to eliminating child pornography from the Internet.
`
`20.
`
`The Lion’s Den is also a strong public proponent of First Amendment rights and
`
`is proud that its former Chief Operating Officer, Jim Everett, was recently appointed as the
`
`president of the board of The Free Speech Coalition. The Lion’s Den is a corporate sponsor of
`
`The Free Speech Coalition.
`
`21.
`
`Beginning with a single store in Columbus, Ohio, in 1971, The Lion’s Den has
`
`grown to an expansive network of nearly 40 retail adult superstores located in sixteen states
`
`throughout the United States.
`
`22.
`
`For several years, The Lion’s Den previously operated a retail adult superstore in
`
`southern Florida and is currently in negotiations to purchase and operate five additional retail
`
`superstore outlets in the Miami area.
`
`{Hll93002.2)
`
`6
`
`

`
`23.
`
`In addition to its brick-and-mortar stores, The Lion’s Den operates a substantial
`
`national online business via its LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.co1n Internet websites.
`
`24.
`
`Through the LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.co1n Internet websites,
`
`customers are able to purchase the same types of adult-oriented items available at The Lion’s
`
`Den’s brick-and—mortar adult superstores.
`
`25.
`
`Additionally, visitors to the LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.com Internet
`
`websites can utilize The Lion’s Den’s “video-on-demand” services to purchase and immediately
`
`view adult videos via the Internet using streaming video technology.
`
`The Lion’s Den’s Trademarks
`
`THE LION’S DEN® and THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette Marks
`
`26.
`
`Since 1971, The Lion’s Den has continuously and actively promoted and used
`
`THE LION’S DEN® name and trademark in connection with its various retail adult
`
`entertainment services.
`
`27.
`
`The Lion’s Den owns United States Trademark Registration No. 2,301,567 for its
`
`THE LION’S DEN® mark for retail stores featuring adult books, videos, novelties, leather, CD-
`
`ROMS, and lingerie. A true and accurate copy of a printout from the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office TARR website showing the status of United States Trademark Registration
`
`No. 2,301,567 is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`28.
`
`The Lion’s Den’s United States Trademark Registration No. 2,301,567 for its
`
`THE LION’S DEN® mark is incontestable pursuant
`
`to 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1065 and provides
`
`constructive nationwide notice of its ownership of THE LION’S DEN® mark pursuant to 15
`
`U.S.C. §l072.
`
`(I-lll93002.Z)
`
`7
`
`

`
`29.
`
`In addition, for over a decade, The Lion’s Den has actively used and promoted a
`
`distinctive stylized version of its THE LION’S DEN® mark consisting of a male lion and female
`
`lioness silhouetted together in black against a backdrop of a sun that appears in various hues of
`
`orange, yellow, and brown (hereinafter, “THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette”) to identify its
`
`retail adult entertainment services. The Lion’s Den also uses variants of THE LION’S DEN
`
`Stylized Silhouette in black-and-white and black-and-yellow two-tone color combinations.
`
`30.
`
`Following is a true and accurate copy of a print advertisement containing
`
`Plaintiffs’ black-and-white version of THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette mark:
`
`_Q§_
`LIONS DEN
`
`~ ‘-1l~l..tir.;<r:\.'n -mm lmn«.dm.vdul1iwr.
`
`.\ .\H RI('.»\‘S lA\'()Rl'l l- ADI l.'l" SL'l’l"RSTORli
`m 5 \ 1‘ H’
`~'*
`
`31.
`
`THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette is inherently distinctive when considered
`
`in light of or used to identify The Lion’s Den’s retail adult entertainment services.
`
`{H1 1930012)
`
`8
`
`

`
`32.
`
`The Lion’s Den prominently features its THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette at
`
`the top of each of the web pages available from its LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.com
`
`Internet websites,
`
`in its retail adult Superstores, and on other advertising and promotional
`
`materials. Following is a true and accurate screenshot of the Plaintiffs’ LionsDenAdult.com web
`
`page, on or about April 1, 2008:
`
`Qaack '
`.:«.u~ ,, gjhttnzl/www.|iI7nsdenadLl.cornJ
`
`‘
`
`Seavch
`
`Favortes
`
`-
`
`.
`
`-
`
`v flea
`
`..
`
`'
`
`J 1
`
`"..1rv:.'.vu.x.<ll)':'r(-Hie,-:1 rr1.c1t:rx.-4|
`Md-. d for ;«::ult 4.4- o'\’,.
`
`LN 1 .;;s Univ
`
`{Hll930022)
`
`9
`
`

`
`The Lion’s Head Mark
`
`33.
`
`As a complement to its lion-themed name, marks, and marketing motif, The
`
`Lion’s Den also created and uses the following stylized representation of a lion head (“Lion’s
`
`Head Mark”) to identify its retail adult entertainment services:
`
`
`
`34.
`
`Since at least as early as 1992, the Lion’s Den has used its registered Lion’s Head
`
`Mark in connection with its retail adult entertainment services.
`
`35.
`
`The Lion’s Den owns United States Trademark Registration No. 2,428,085 for its
`
`Lion’s Head Mark for retail stores featuring adult books, videos, novelties, leather, CD-ROMS,
`
`and lingerie. A true and accurate copy of a printout from the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office TARR website showing the status of United States Trademark Registration
`
`No. 2,428,085 is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`36.
`
`The Lion’s Den’s registration for its Lion’s Head Mark is incontestable pursuant
`
`to 15 U.S.C. § 1065 and provides constructive nationwide notice of its ownership of Lion’s Head
`
`Mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1072.
`
`ll-lll9300Z.2)
`
`

`
`Advertising, Promotion, and Commercial Success of The Lion’s Den Marks
`
`37.
`
`THE LIONS DEN® name and mark, THE LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette
`
`mark, and the Lion’s Head Mark are collectively referred to as “The Lion’s Den Marks.”
`
`38.
`
`Plaintiffs’ methods of promoting The Lion’s Den Marks include advertisements in
`
`newspapers and other printed publications,
`
`in television and radio commercials,
`
`in print
`
`brochures and flyers, on billboards and other signage, and on the Internet.
`
`39.
`
`The Lion’s Den also regularly promotes The Lion’s Den Marks through, and in
`
`conjunction with, in-person guest appearances by celebrity adult film entertainers at its network
`
`of THE LION’S DEN® retail outlets. Celebrity adult entertainers who have recently appeared at
`
`The Lion’s Den’s venues include Carmen Luvana, Kelly Madison, Flower Tucci, Brandy Talore,
`
`and Gina Lynn. A true and accurate copy of a flyer advertising one such guest appearance is
`
`attached as Exhibit C.
`
`40.
`
`The Lion’s Den further promotes THE LION’S DEN® and THE LION’S DEN
`
`Stylized Silhouette name and marks through printed flyers and commercial announcements
`
`distributed and displayed at third-party cabarets featuring nude/erotic dancing.
`
`41.
`
`In 2007 alone, The Lion’s Den spent in excess of $2,000,000 advertising and
`
`promoting The Lion’s Den Marks.
`
`42. With respect to their online promotion of The Lion’s Den Marks, in 2007 alone,
`
`Plaintiffs’ LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.com Internet websites had a combined total
`
`of 71 million hits from nearly 450,000 unique Visitors.
`
`43.
`
`In 2007 alone, Plaintiffs’ network of THE LION’S DEN® retail outlets enjoyed
`
`over $40 million in sales in connection with Plaintiffs’ The Lion’s Den Marks throughout the
`
`United States and Via its LionsDenAdult.com and LionsDenGold.com Internet websites.
`
`{H1l930022)
`
`11
`
`

`
`44.
`
`The Lion’s Den’s efforts and expenditures of time and money in promoting and
`
`offering its retail adult entertainment services under The Lion’s Den Marks have created
`
`substantial and valuable goodwill in those marks.
`
`Defendants’ Wrongful Acts
`
`45.
`
`One or more of the Defendants operates Rachel’s Adult Entertainment and
`
`Steakhouse——a multiple-location cabaret featuring nude/erotic dancing and dining.
`
`46.
`
`Defendants are currently preparing to open a new cabaret under the name “LIONS
`
`[sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE” that will also feature nude/erotic dancing and dining.
`
`47.
`
`Defendants intend to open their new adult-oriented LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET
`
`& STEAKHOUSE at 1350 SW 2nd Street, Pompano Beach, Florida.
`
`48.
`
`In January 2008, the following sign appeared outside Defendants’ new location:
`
`LIONS DEN &
`ADULT CABARET 5’ STEAK HOUSE
`?‘lC\'L" V511-5551313 1‘/WWlfC.'lSD'.'N[AlAkf‘|’.CON
`ADULT ENTERTAINMENT
`P C)‘ *
`
`I
`
`1 As detailed below, Defendants use and have applied to register multiple variations of phrases comprised of or
`containing the term “LION’S DEN” including “LION’S DEN,” “LIONS DEN,” and “LIONSDEN.” As used in this
`Verified Complaint and accompanying Motion, the phrase “LIONS [sic] DEN” shall be understood to encompass
`each of Defendants’ varying uses. For the reasons detailed in the accompanying Motion, the slight variations and
`inconsistencies of Defendants’ varying uses are inconsequential to their liability on the claims asserted herein.
`
`{Hll930022)
`
`

`
`Recently, Defendants unveiled the following additional signage bearing the mark LIONS [sic]
`
`DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE:
`
`eakh'o
`
`,
`
`49.
`
`To promote their new adult-oriented entertainment services, Defendants have
`
`also, without The Lion’s Den’s authorization, registered the domain name LionsDenCabaret.com
`
`and are using that website to advertise the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE.
`
`50.
`
`According to Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.con1 Internet website, “Lions [sic]
`
`Den Cabaret & Steakhouse is a 17,000 square foot premier adult entertainment complex. The
`
`club features a full liquor menu, total nudity and a prime steakhouse. The main show bar has
`
`four stages surrounded by plush seating for your viewing pleasure.”
`
`(1-111930022)
`
`13
`
`

`
`51.
`
`Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website
`
`further
`
`indicates
`
`that
`
`Defendants’ “Lions [sic] Den Cabaret and Steakhouse” is “South Florida’s Premier Adult Club.”
`
`52.
`
`Prior to April 3, 2008, Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website
`
`indicated that Defendants’ “Lion’s Den” is “Coming Soon!”
`
`53.
`
`On or about April 3, 2008, Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.co1n Internet website
`
`was updated to indicate that the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE “Grand
`
`Opening” will be “April 9th!”
`
`54.
`
`Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website prominently features the
`
`LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE name. Following is a true and accurate
`
`screenshot of the LionsDenCabaret.com web page, on or about April 1, 2008:
`
` File Edk VIBW Favorites Tools Heb
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`(J Buck '
`{Q hm-::IIwv4vv.|iorxsdencabaret.corrnJ
`
`.
`
`Search
`
`Favurkes
`
`v
`
`'
`
`[II-.‘
`
`V
`
`Go
`
`.
`
`'v-
`
`"
`
`
`
`{H11930022)
`
`

`
`55.
`
`Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website also displays a stylized
`
`depiction of the words “Lion’s Den” along with a stylized depiction of a male lion and female
`
`lioness silhouetted together in black against a backdrop of the sun that appears in various hues of
`
`orange, yellow, and brown (“Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark”). Following is a true and
`
`accurate screenshot of the LionsDenCabaret.com web page, on or about April 1, 2008:
`
`l.4'.".i:'{I' «Li
`
`,
`
`[.inn'.s <l)cr1 ()< t.'F('ica'
`
`Deveiopcrs of Rachels Steakhouse do it again
`bringing South Florida a premier gcnticmcfis club
`with a prime five-star steakhouse.
`
`‘cm! [il2"V.'I|Pl
`
`wine cellar
`""“ " ‘ “"
`
`fiur mm
`
`.
`
`lg] Dune
`
`.
`
`;
`
`fl Internet
`
`56.
`
`Additionally, also without The Lion’s Den’s authorization, Defendants have filed
`
`United States Trademark Application No. 77/129,135 for the mark LION’S DEN CABARET &
`
`STEAKHOUSE for “theatrical and musical floor shows provided at nightclubs” and “restaurant
`
`and bar services.”
`
`(1-111930022)
`
`15
`
`

`
`57.
`
`Further still, Defendants have, without The Lion’s Den’s authorization, filed
`
`United States Trademark Application No. 77/303,797 for the mark LIONSDEN [sic] CABARET
`
`& STEAKHOUSE and Design for “theatrical and musical floor shows provided at nightclubs”
`
`and “restaurant and bar services.”
`
`58.
`
`Defendants’ United States Trademark Application Nos.
`
`77/303,797 and
`
`77/129,135 each include a disclaimer of “CABARET & STEAKHOUSE.”
`
`Plaintiffs’ Attempts to Resolve the Dispute
`
`59.
`
`The Lion’s Den first became aware of Defendants and Defendants’ activities
`
`involving the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE in late January 2008 when Frank
`
`Arstone, a former vendor to The Lion’s Den, saw Defendants’ sign and called mistakenly
`
`thinking that the Defendants’ Pompano Beach LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE
`
`was one of Plaintiffs’ stores.
`
`60.
`
`Through its counsel, The Lion’s Den wrote Defendants on February 13, 2008,
`
`demanding that Defendants cease-and-desist their use of the name and mark LION’S DEN
`
`CABARET & STEAKHOUSE and the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark. The Lion’s Den’s
`
`cease-and-desist letter demanded a response by February 25, 2008. A copy of The Lion’s Den’s
`
`letter is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
`
`61.
`
`On February 25, 2008, counsel for Defendants contacted counsel for Plaintiffs to
`
`discuss this matter.
`
`62.
`
`As a result of the parties’ conversation, Plaintiffs agreed to give Defendants until
`
`March 7, 2008, to propose a satisfactory resolution of this matter.
`
`{H1193oo2.z )
`
`16
`
`

`
`63.
`
`Thereafter, the parties’ counsel engaged in further discussions and, at Defendants’
`
`counsel’s request, The Lion’s Den allowed Defendants until March 18, 2008, to propose a
`
`satisfactory resolution of this matter.
`
`64.
`
`Defendants were unwilling to cease-and-desist their use of the name and mark
`
`LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE and the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark.
`
`As a result, the parties were unable to reach an amicable resolution of this matter.
`
`The Parties’ Related Services, Identical Customers, and Identical Channels of Trade
`
`65.
`
`Adult entertainment services such as the nude/erotic dancing advertised on
`
`Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website and the retail adult entertainment services
`
`offered by The Lion’s Den both target consumers seeking adult entertainment.
`
`66.
`
`Adult entertaimnent services such as the nude/erotic dancing advertised on
`
`Defendants’ LionsDenCabaret.com Internet website and the retail adult entertainment services
`
`offered by The Lion’s Den are advertised through the same advertising media.
`
`67.
`
`Adult film entertainers such as those who have made personal appearances in
`
`connection with the advertising and promotion of The Lion’s Den’s retail outlets also appear as
`
`entertainers at adult cabarets like the Defendants’.
`
`68.
`
`Adult entertainment
`
`facilities such as The Lion’s Den retail outlets and
`
`nude/erotic dancing facilities such as the Defendants’
`
`frequently appear in close physical
`
`proximity to each other.
`
`69.
`
`The Lion’s Den’s retail outlets and the Defendants’ location at 1350 SW 2nd
`
`Street, Pompano Beach, Florida, are constructed in a marmer so as to prevent members of the
`
`public from viewing the goods or services provided within those buildings from the exteriors of
`
`those buildings.
`
`:1-m93oo2.2)
`
`17
`
`

`
`70.
`
`It is not uncommon for the same enterprise to operate or license the operation of
`
`both an establishment offering the retail sale of adult-oriented products (such as those operated
`
`by The Lion’s Den) and an establishment featuring nude/erotic dancing (such as the Defendants’
`
`cabaret).
`
`71.
`
`Adult videos available at
`
`the Lion’s Den’s
`
`retail
`
`locations and on its
`
`LionsDenAdult.co1n and LionsDenGold.com Internet websites feature nude/erotic performances
`
`by adult entertainers.
`
`72.
`
`Adult cabarets such as the Defendants’ feature nude/erotic performances by adult
`
`entertainers.
`
`Defendants’ Bad Faith
`
`73.
`
`Defendants used the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark and
`
`Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark with constructive notice of The Lion’s Den’s ownership of a
`
`federal registration for THE LION’S DEN.
`
`74.
`
`Defendants used the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark and
`
`Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark with constructive notice of The Lion’s Den’s ownership of a
`
`federal registration for the Lion’s Head Mark.
`
`75.
`
`Defendants filed United States Trademark Application Nos. 77/303,797 and
`
`77/129,135 with constructive notice of The Lion’s Den’s ownership of federal registrations for
`
`THE LION’S DEN and the Lion’s Head Mark.
`
`76.
`
`Defendants used the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark and
`
`Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark with actual notice of The Lion’s Den’s trademark rights since
`
`at least February 13, 2008, when The Lion’s Den objected to Defendants’ actions in writing.
`
`(H11930022 )
`
`

`
`77.
`
`Despite actual notice of The Lion’s Den’s trademark rights, Defendants declined
`
`to cease their infringing activities.
`
`78.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants’ adoption and use of the LIONS [sic] DEN
`
`CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark with knowledge of The Lion’s Den’s prior use of THE
`
`LION’S DEN name and mark and Lion’s Head Mark are deliberate, intentional and willful
`
`attempts to trade upon and misappropriate the goodwill and commercial appeal associated with
`
`The Lion’s Den’s trademarks without proper compensation to The Lion’s Den.
`
`79.
`
`On information and belief, Defendants’
`
`registered the LionsDenCabaret.com
`
`domain name with bad faith intent to profit from THE LION’S DEN name and mark.
`
`Injug to The Lion’s Den and the Public
`
`80.
`
`Defendants’ use of the LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark
`
`and the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark is without Plaintiffs’ consent or authorization.
`
`81.
`
`Defendants’ misappropriation of The Lion’s Den’s THE LION’S DEN and THE
`
`LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette marks is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception as
`
`to the source or origin of Defendants and their services.
`
`82.
`
`Defendants’ misappropriation of The Lion’s Den’s THE LION’S DEN and THE
`
`LION’S DEN Stylized Silhouette marks is likely to falsely suggest
`
`that a sponsorship,
`
`connection, license, or association exists between Defendants, their services, their commercial
`
`activities and the Plaintiffs.
`
`83.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful acts are willful and in wanton disregard of Plaintiffs and
`
`their valuable intellectual property rights. Defendants knowingly sought to deceive Plaintiffs’
`
`valued customers and to enjoy and profit from The Lion’s Den’s goodwill and reputation.
`
`{Hll9300Z.Z)
`
`

`
`84.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful acts have caused actual damage to Plaintiffs in an amount
`
`to be proven at trial.
`
`85.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful acts have irreparably injured Plaintiffs and, if not enjoined,
`
`will continue to injure Plaintiffs irreparably.
`
`86.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful acts have irreparably injured the public and, if not enjoined,
`
`will continue to injure the public irreparably because, as the Eleventh Circuit has recognized, the
`
`public has an interest in being free from confusion, mistake, and deception as to the source,
`
`affiliation, or sponsorship of goods and services available in the marketplace.
`
`87.
`
`Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy of law.
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Federal Trademark Infringement of THE LION’S DEN Mark and Lion’s Head Mark
`Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act,
`15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)
`
`88.
`
`The Lion’s Den repeats and re-alleges every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 87 of Plaintiffs’ Complaint as if fully set forth here.
`
`89.
`
`Defendants have used in commerce the marks LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET &
`
`STEAKHOUSE (including, but not limited to the marks depicted in United States Trademark
`
`Application Nos. 77/303,797 and 77/129,135),
`
`the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark, and
`
`associated lion imagery marks.
`
`90.
`
`Defendants
`
`have
`
`used
`
`the marks LIONS
`
`[sic] DEN CABARET &
`
`STEAKHOUSE (including, but not limited to the marks depicted in United States Trademark
`
`Application Nos. 77/303,797 and 77/129,135),
`
`the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark, and
`
`associated lion imagery marks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, and/or
`
`advertising of adult-oriented entertairmient services.
`
`(l-lll93002.2 )
`
`

`
`91.
`
`Defendants’ LIONS [sic] DEN CABARET & STEAKHOUSE mark (including,
`
`but not limited to the marks depicted in United States Trademark Application Nos. 77/303,797
`
`and 77/129,135), the Infringing Silhouetted Lions Mark, and associated lion imagery marks are
`
`reproductions, counterfeits, copies, and colorable imitations of The Lion’s Den’s registered THE
`
`LION’S DEN mark and The Lion’s Den’s registered Lion’s

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket