Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA437574
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`10/25/2011
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91184464
`Plaintiff
`Medimmune, Inc.
`CONSTANCE GOLDEN
`ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB
`666 THIRD AVENUE
`NEW YORK, NY 10017
`UNITED STATES
`cgolden@lawabel.com, Rdahl@lawabel.com
`Stipulated/Consent Motion to Extend
`Constance Golden
`cgolden@lawabel.com
`/Constance Golden/
`10/25/2011
`20111025105032206.pdf ( 3 pages )(103092 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In Re Application No. 79/043095 Published March 18, 2008
`In Re Application No. 79/039076 Published February 5, 2008
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91 184464
`Opposition No. 91 184465
`
`CONSOLIDATED
`
` Meclimmune, Inc.
`
`Opposer
`
`V
`
`
`
`Sygnis Pharma AG
`
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`CONSENTED RE UEST FOR SUSPENSION
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §2.l17(c) of the Trademark Rules of Practice and §5l0.03(a)
`
`of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure, Applicant, with the
`
`consent of the Opposer, requests a further 90 day suspension of the proceeding to allow
`
`the parties to finalize their settlement efforts.
`
`The parties have been working diligently towards finalizing settlement and
`
`resolving the pending Oppositions. The parties respectfully inform the Board that they
`
`have been actively engaged in settlement discussions for quite some time and have
`
`agreed on August 18, 2011 to a proposed settlement in principle of the issues between the
`
`parties. The agreed to issues include:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`SYGNIS only used for a company name and not a product name (except as
`
`the corporate name might incidentally appear on packaging, etc.)
`
`Consistently use SYGNIS in combination with “Pharma AG” (at least in the
`
`first and most prominent use; preference to have the wording added to the
`
`logo if possible).
`
`

`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`A field of use restriction consistent with an agreement with Abbott
`
`Laboratories.
`
`Withdraw (and do not re-file) the U.S. trademark application for SYGNIS.
`
`In order to finalize the terms of a Settlement Agreement and to preserve their
`
`rights to proceed in this matter, the parties request a further extension of the suspension
`
`period while the terms of their Written settlement agreement are finalized. The parties
`
`remain hopeful that a final settlement will be reached Within the next ninety days.
`
`It is requested that the Board grant this request and approve the scheduling order
`
`set forth below:
`
`Expert Disclosures Due:
`
`Discovery Closes:
`
`January 27, 2012
`
`February 26, 2012
`
`Plaintiff’ s Pretrial Disclosures:
`
`April 11, 2012
`
`Plaintiffs 30-day Trial Period Ends:
`
`May 26, 2012
`
`Defendant’s Pretrial Disclosures:
`
`June 10, 2012
`
`Defendant’s 30-day Trial period Ends:
`
`July 25, 2012
`
`Plaintiffs Rebuttal Disclosures:
`
`August 9, 2012
`
`Plaintiffs 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends:
`
`September 8, 2012
`
`On October 24, 2011 counsel for both parties consented and agreed via telephone
`
`and email to this motion and further suspension of this proceeding.
`
`Wherefore, it is requested that this suspension be granted.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CONSTANCE G LDEN
`
`ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB
`
`666 Third Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10017
`212-949-9022
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was served by first class mail,
`
`postage prepaid this 25"‘ day of October, 2011 on the following:
`
`Catherine J. Holland, Esq.
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, California 92615
`

`
`CONSTANCE GOLDEN

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket