throbber
Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA172489
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`11/01/2007
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91175524
`Plaintiff
`Inspiration Software, Inc.
`David P. Cooper
`Kolisch Hartwell, P.C.
`520 S.W. Yamhill Street, Suite 200
`Portland, OR 97204
`UNITED STATES
`coop@khpatent.com
`Opposition/Response to Motion
`David P. Cooper
`mandi@khpatent.com,cooper@khpatent.com
`/david p. cooper/
`11/01/2007
`20071101 Opposer's Opposition to Applicant's Motion for Summary
`Judgment.pdf ( 8 pages )(113058 bytes )
`Exhibit A Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment 9-27-07.pdf ( 30 pages
`)(1194831 bytes )
`Opp 1st set of Interrogatories 8-22-07.pdf ( 12 pages )(150767 bytes )
`Opp 1st Set of Req for Admissions 8-22-07.pdf ( 4 pages )(108818 bytes )
`Opp. 1st Req for Production of Docs 8-22-07.pdf ( 5 pages )(114164 bytes )
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No. 91175524
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION
`TO APPLlCANT’S MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`INSPIRATION SOFTWARE, INC.
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`INSPIRED DESIGN, LLC
`
`Applicant.
`
`Attn: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`S i r :
`
`\_/\_/\_/\./\./\_/\_/\_/
`
`)
`
`Introduction
`
`For reasons which follow, opposer Inspiration Software, Inc. requests that the Board deny
`
`App|icant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“App|icant’s SJ Motion”) filed on September 27, 2007.
`
`The Board should deny app|icant’s motion because there are genuine issues of material
`
`fact concerning most of the pertinent factors upon which the Board makes a |ike|ihood-of-
`
`confusion (“LOC”) determination. Genuine issues of material fact exist concerning at least the
`
`following LOC factors: similarity of the marks, goods/services, trade channels, strength of the
`
`mark, and app|icant’s intent in choosing the mark.
`
`In addition to the above reasons, opposer
`
`requests that the Board deny App|icant’s SJ Motion because it is premature. Opposer should be
`
`allowed to receive app|icant’s responses to opposer’s discovery requests, and to othenNise
`
`proceed with the opposition through testimony periods and final briefing.
`
`Prior to testimony
`
`periods, opposer is not required to “demonstrate the damage likely to accrue as a result” of
`
`app|icant’s registration.
`
`Page 1
`
`-
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`On October 1, 2007, opposer received App|icant’s SJ Motion and APPL|CANT’S BRIEF IN
`
`SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (“App|icant’s Supporting Brief”).
`
`App|icant’s Supporting Brief is attached as Exhibit A, and it includes a one-page Introduction
`
`followed by what appear to be three or four exhibits. Following the Introduction are several pages
`
`from the USPTO website that include a listing of other oppositions naming opposer. There is no
`
`coversheet to this document. Next follows a cover sheet entitled Exhibit B followed by the
`
`Declaration of Michele Behrenwald (“the Behrenwald Declaration”), president and owner of
`
`applicant. Another coversheet entitled Exhibit C follows with what appears to be a copy of
`
`applicants federal trademark-service mark application for INSPIRED DESIGN. Then, there is a
`
`coversheet for Exhibit D with what appears to be a copy of opposer’s Notice of Opposition for the
`
`present opposition.
`
`Referring to Exhibit A, there is no discussion of the pertinent law and caselaw, and there is
`
`no application of law to facts. There is also no Certificate of Service. Opposer is assuming Nov.
`
`1, 2007 is the deadline for opposition of App|icant’s SJ Motion based upon the 9-27-07 date
`
`app|icant’s attorney signed that motion, thereby allowing opposer 30 days plus five extra days for
`
`mail service.
`
`Opposer is somewhat at a loss to understand the legal basis for app|icant’s SJ Motion, but
`
`it will respond below as best that it can.
`
`Exhibit D to App|icant’s Supporting Brief provides
`
`opposer’s allegations, and Exhibit C provides app|icant’s application. Opposer does not
`
`understand how either of these is relevant to a summary judgment ruling. Opposer also does not
`
`understand the significance of the summary pages that appear to be from the USPTO website
`
`and list oppositions naming opposer.
`
`App|icant’s only testimonial support for its assertion that there are no genuine issues of
`
`material fact exist and summmary judgment is proper is offered by app|icant’s president and
`
`Page 2 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`owner, testimony that cannot possibly be persuasive due to its inherent bias. Nonetheless, the
`
`Behrenwald Declaration includes app|icant’s legal conclusion that opposer’s and app|icant’s marks
`
`are different, their goods and services are different, and that pertinent consumers would not be
`
`confused.
`
`Notably, and in contrast
`
`to the Notice of Opposition,
`
`the Behrenwald contests that
`
`opposer’s trademark/service mark rights are limited to the goods/services recited in opposer’s
`
`federal registrations listed in paragraphs 3 and 4 of that Notice of Opposition.
`
`In so doing,
`
`applicant dismisses opposer’s other trademark/service mark rights in its family of marks including
`
`its INSPIREDATA mark, and its INSPIRED mark (see paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition), as well as dismisses the broad scope of protection opposer believes it has based
`
`upon paragraphs 2, 7 and 9 of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`Nowhere does applicant mention that it has filed App|icant’s SJ Motion during an extension
`
`period granted by opposer to respond to Opposer’s discovery requests,unsigned copies of which
`
`are attached collectively as Exhibit B. Those discovery requests include a first set of Requests for
`
`Production of Documents,
`
`lnterrogatories, and Requests for Admission. Opposer granted the
`
`extension twice to further settlement discussions. Applicant apparently decided instead to file
`
`App|icant’s SJ Motion to leverage settlement.
`
`If the Board denies App|icant’s SJ Motion, opposer
`
`and reinstates the proceedings it susepnded by Order dated October 4, 2007, opposer will be able
`
`to receive app|icant’s discovery responses by resetting a new deadline with applicant.
`
`Facts
`
`The present opposition involves applicant’s mark INSPIRED DESIGN for “books in the
`
`field of business management and operation; books in the field of personal development; religious
`
`books; gifts, namely picture books, story books, flash cards, children’s books, blank journal books,
`
`and decals; greeting cards; pictures; paintings,
`
`in International Class 16; games, namely board
`
`Page 3 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`games and card games; toys, namely pet toys,
`
`in International Class 28; consulting services in
`
`new business start-up, business organization and management, and product and business-
`
`services development; auctioneering,
`
`in International Class 35 educational services, namely
`
`conducting seminars, workshops, lectures and classes in the fields of leadership, management,
`
`personal development, entrepreneurism,
`
`invention and creativity, educational services, namely,
`
`one-on-one mentoring in the field of career management; career counseling; charitable services,
`
`namely, educational mentoring and development of youth; operating instructions camps for youth,
`
`in
`
`International Class 41; and providing information on techniques for
`
`improving personal
`
`creativity; personal growth and motivation consulting services; personal
`
`lifestyle consulting
`
`services, in International Class 45”.
`
`Applicant filed its intent-to-use application on June 21, 2005 and is accorded that date as
`
`its priority date if it uses the mark and files a Statement of Use evidencing that use in the required
`
`time period. As noted in opposer’s Notice of Opposition, opposer owns U.S. trademark and
`
`service mark registrations for the mark INSPIRATION. Opposer’s INSPIRATION mark is used for
`
`the following goods and services: computer programs in the field of idea development through
`
`visual diagramming, outlining and text creation,
`
`in International Class 9; computer education
`
`training, in International Class 41; and computer software design for others, in International Class
`
`42.
`
`Opposer’s market is the education market, which includes K-12, colleges, universities, and
`
`the adult education industry including corporate training and lifelong learning. Opposer also owns
`
`allowed U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 78/734,800 for the mark INSPIRED for “computer
`
`software for use as a writing tool
`
`in education, home and business”. Opposer’s use of
`
`INSPIRATION is senior to app|icant’s priority date for INSPIRED DESIGN, and opposer’s other
`
`applications for INSPIRED and INSPIREDATA form a family of marks that provide a broad scope
`
`Page 4 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`of trademark/service mark protection.
`
`Argument
`
`Referring to Exhibit A, App|icant’s Supporting Brief fails to show that genuine issues of
`
`material fact are not in dispute. To the contrary, the Behrenwald Declaration is essentially like
`
`app|icant’s answer, including the opinions of app|icant’s president and founder about the merits of
`
`the opposition.
`
`Opposer disagrees with app|icant’s approach, and urges the Board to allow the opposition
`
`to continue based upon the allegations in opposer’s Notice of Opposition, and based upon the
`
`genuine issues of material
`
`fact
`
`that exist concerning the likelihood-of-confusion (LOC)
`
`determination.
`
`First, applicant has a difficult burden because it must show the Board there are no genuine
`
`issues of material fact.
`
`According to the Board, the following standards apply to motions for summaryjudgment:
`
`Generally, summary judgment is appropriate in cases where the moving party
`establishes that there are no genuine issues of material fact which require
`resolution at trial and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 56(c). An issue is material when its resolution would affect the outcome of
`the proceeding under governing law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.
`242, 248 (1986). However, a dispute over a fact which would not alter the
`Board's decision on the legal issue will not prevent entry of summary judgment.
`See, for example, Kellogg Co. v. Pack’Em Enterprises Inc., 951 F.3d 330, 21
`USPQ2d 1142 (Fed. Circ. 1991 ). A fact is genuinely in dispute if the evidence of
`record is such that a reasonable fact finder could return a verdict in favor of the
`
`nonmoving party. See LIoyd’s Food Products Inc. v. EIi’s Inc., 987 F.2d 766, 25
`USPQ2d 2027 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The nonmoving party must be given the benefit
`of all reasonable doubt as to whether genuine issues of material fact exist, and
`the evidentiary record on summary judgment,
`including all
`inferences to be
`drawn from the undisputed facts, must be viewed in the light most favorable to
`the nonmoving party. See Ogrvland USA, Inc. v. Great American Music Show,
`Inc., 970 F.2d 847, 23 USPQ2d 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1992). O/de Tvme Foods Inc. v.
`Roundv’s Inc., 961 F.2d 200, 22 USPQ2d 1542 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
`
`Chesapeake Bank v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland, 2004 TTAB Lexis 49 (TTAB 2004).
`
`Under the pertinent standard, the Board should deny App|icant’s SJ Motion because there
`
`Page 5 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`are genuine issues of material fact involving most of the thirteen factors the Board uses to make a
`
`likelihood-of-confusion determination. See, In re E.
`
`I. duPont deNemours & C0,, 476 F.2d 1357,
`
`177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).
`
`Among the duPont factors for which there are genuine issues of material fact, the following
`
`are possibly the most critical to the Board’s determination:
`
`(i) similarity of the marks, (ii) similarity of the parties’ goods/services; (iii) similarity of the
`
`parties’ trade channels; (iv) the strength of opposer’s mark; and (v) app|icant’s intent in choosing
`
`the mark.
`
`As described above, opposer is a senior user of INSPIRATION and has a family-of-marks
`
`argument
`
`relative to its other marks
`
`INSPIREDATA and INSPIRED.
`
`App|icant’s goods
`
`identification/services recitation is broad enough to pose a trademark problem with respect to
`
`opposer’s trademark/service mark rights
`
`in
`
`|NSP|RAT|ON,|NSP|REDATA and INSPIRED.
`
`Opposer owns prior rights in its INSPIRATION and has a family of marks that includes the marks
`
`INSPIREDATA and INSPIRED. App|icant’s INSPIRED DESIGN mark is confusingly similar to
`
`opposer’s marks. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b), opposer INSPIRATION registrations are prima facie
`
`evidence that opposer owns its marks and has the right
`
`to use them in commerce. Those
`
`registrations also carry a presumption of damage from registration of a confusingly similar mark
`
`like app|icant’s INSPIRED DESIGN mark.
`
`Second, with respect to the merits, and in contrast
`
`to app|icant’s “evidence” in the
`
`Behrenwald Declaration, opposer’s INSPIRATION mark is famous within its industry, and should
`
`be entitled to a broad scope of protection. App|icant’s mark is similar to opposer’s registered
`
`INSPIRATION mark.
`
`App|icant’s goods/services are also related to opposer’s goods/services based upon the
`
`broadly worded goods identification/services recitation present in app|icant’s published application.
`
`Page 6 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`In addition, for purposes of App|icant’s SJ Motion, that goods identification/services recitation
`
`means app|icant’s goods/services are marketed similarly to opposer’s since there is no market
`
`restriction in it.
`
`Consistent with the notice pleading principle of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as
`
`adopted by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, opposer has alleged facts sufficient to support
`
`this proceeding. Further, as noted above, there are genuine issues of material fact concerning
`
`several key LOC factors such as similarity of the marks, goods/services and trade channels,
`
`strength of opposer’s mark, and applicants intent in choosing her mark.
`
`Accordingly, the Board should deny app|icant’s motion for summary judgment and let the
`
`oppostion continue.
`
`Dated: November 1, 2007.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CERTIFICATION UNDER 37 C.F.R.
`
`1.8
`
`KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C.
`
`I hereby certify that OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO
`APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT is being filed electronically with the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office via the
`Electronic System for Trademark Trials and
`Appeals this 1st day of November, 2007.
`
`/David p_ Coogefl
`David P_ Cooper
`
`/David p_ Coopefl
`David P Cooper
`Re istration No 33 372
`g
`'
`’
`Of Attorneys for Opposer
`_
`_
`520 S.W. Yamhlll Street, Suite 200
`
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 224-6655
`Facsimile: (503)295-6679
`
`Page 7 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION
`
`TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT was served on applicant, by service
`
`on its attorneys Jeffrey A. Nelson and Michael B. O’Nea| of Warner Norcross & Judd LLP,
`
`located at 900 Fifth Third Center, 111 Lyon Street, N.W., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503-2487
`
`by emailing the same on November 1, 2007 and mailing the same via first class mail, postage
`
`prepaid, in a sealed envelope to the aforementioned address on November 2, 2007.
`
`/David P. Cooperl
`David P. Cooper
`Of Attorneys for Opposer
`
`Page 1
`
`-
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`

`
`Exhibit A
`
`EN THE UN§'E‘EB STATES PATENT ANE} ”E"F';ADE1WA.RK QFFECE
`BEFGRE THE TRs%.DEMAR§{ TREAL ANE} AFPEAL B€I§.!§RB
`
`
`
`
`
`w\H S A
`
`
`Qppositim No; 911'?5S2«'-1
`
`T:
`
`) )
`
`}
`
`) 3
`
`)
`
`Ensgzsiratiim Scftware, Imt.
`
`Cgngaaser,
`
`V.
`
`inspired (it-:si(3n, El:
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`AP?LICANT’S TEON FQR SEE’ JUBGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Appiicam iuspireci desifin, Hie (“s§;J§iis‘:ant”), by and ihrough its attomeys Wamer
`
`Norcrcrss
`
`Judd LLP, hereby moves for smnrnary judgment pursuant to 3'? CFR § 2,12?‘ and
`
`Fads}. R. Civ. P. 55. As set fzsrth in the attached briefi the cppositian af Upposar inspiraiim
`
`Software.‘ inc. {“{3§)pusa£r’“} shmxld be dismissefi becamse-*2, as 3, mattar Qf flaw and fact, there is me
`
`iikelihoed (sf COE‘ifLESi{)i‘1 Emtween the Appiicarifis Mark and Opgmserh Mark.
`
`Dai,s':: Sgspztember 27", 2&0?
`
`Re:;;:=ectfuEIy subnxiited,
`
`inspired desiifin, 11::
`
`By: Wamer Norcmss & Judd LLE’
`
`
`§g_’__;’§jichaei B. G’N§_:«;_1
`.3¢=:ffery A. Neisora
`Michael B. CP"‘NeaE
`
`9% Fifth Third Center
`
`1 E3 Lynn Strazet,
`Grand Rapids, Michigan 495=I}3 «X487
`63 s§«7S2»2{}C=€3
`
`Attorney's fox Applicant
`
`

`
`Exhibit A
`
`EN TE-EE E_}NE’i‘E1i1° STATES i’_fiiTENT AND TRi=§i.[3EM.ARi{ GFFECE
`£BEF{3RE 'E°i~iE TRAE‘5EMA}3ii<{ TEEIAL AND APPEAL EUARE
`
`inspiration Software, inc.
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`inspired desifin, lie.
`
`Appiiczirit,
`
`{I3;3_posiiioi*i 1\3i'2.: 9i i?S5ZZ~’1
`
`
`
`E'NTRfii_‘§ UC’E‘.i€l°i‘€
`
`Appiicani inspired dcsiifiii, Eic {“‘Apgiiia:ani"} Sfifiiifi is: register is mark INSPIRED
`i)ESi’(}N fer rciigiaus,
`;::ei’s0nai ciaveiopmant and imsinass managsmerii, gocids and aervices,
`iligigimser inspirmiian S:3fi.w:ire, inc. (“G§pese:"’} ciaims that "iiléi FNWRED DESEGN mark wiii
`iikeiy cause: itoiifusiitsii with Opposesfs .iNSPiii3;A'1"I{)i\i mark, which riiaric is used in connection
`with compgiiiiar pmgriimniing and compuiésr education, A3 set Earth below? Qppoixiefs basis fer
`epposiiig the registratien iacks any merit whaisaever. Tim niarics am :30 -Liissimiiar in appearazica,
`smmeii and conimiatimi
`that ihere art‘: no issues of fact in-:gar:‘Eii1_g that
`issm: of iikaiiihmd 01°
`::.oii.fiisi0n.
`ikiiorecver,
`tiia goods and services with whicsii the parties use their marks are so
`differani in miiiiie: that coiifusioii is 'iiiiiii~:.eiy to remit Fran: the mnteiiipnraneeus use ariftiizz niarks
`in connection with Siich goads and sewices. As::c0r<;iingiy, Appiicaait is entitieii ic: suminaiy
`judgnierit undiar 3? {'.‘.FR 53 2.12? and Fed. R. Civ. P, 56 because there:
`is no iii~;e.iihmi_i {if
`confusion b('3iZV'v’€§3I} Appiicaiifs mia.ri~; and Gpposefs marks as a E'1”iEJ,iZ'i>‘31‘ oifaci anti iaw.
`
`‘v
`
`

`
`\ai..»A A \,_; 4 ,g ; 1.5:
`
`e am. a L\1\A\aLAl'|.l£. n\
`
`1 . ;u,x.s s..L.H.'>.A .4 x§.r‘.c'>.-us.» A.<"\:Q-In us un.1zs.u1 y .u
`
`anu.r~.‘a; L.‘.L.nJ.$J u u\..s..:..)?JL\J.!5u 1r_; u..Mu v u\.; v . kill 1" .iU&...{....i.li».‘!iJXL
`
`
`
`United Stetee Patent and Trademark Qffiee
`
`Heme §Site Index §§earr:h Eeuisies § Centactsieausiness E gen; eiertsi News ifieiga
`
`
`
`'E'TAB‘\iEJE. Trademark ‘Triei and Appeei Beard Enquiry System
`
`Semeeery
`
`Query: Farty Name contains aii ward:-3: "'E3\ESPIRAT1QN SQFTWARE“
`Number ef reeufite: 97
`
`Reeeite ere in reverse chrenefiegicei erder
`
`fiege #1. Ge te page: E1
`
`2 3 4 Next
`
`fimeeeding Eefeedersfis},
`Féiing mete Fmeerwiiee}
`
`3’8?348()i§
`C§Sffl4;"2GD?
`
`
`?866{):348
`Ccdikew {David
`G7,"{}E":,i2{3G? Mark: i<ID—-SPERIENCE S-'#':?86€:‘>{)548
`
`Neintiffis),
`Freeertwfiee}
`
`Ensgiration Seftware; Em;
`Meek‘: INSPIREEE S§:?8734-800
`
`
`Insggiratiers S€.’3fi2\.g“_s,;'_§_E§_E_”_§_, Inn
`
`Sahei, Ruchika
`‘?8Sé3‘?‘.‘?S4
`GEIZBXEGG7 Mark: INSPIRED CHILE 5#:?885?784
`
`EnsQEr_§_i:}_g_n___5aftwas“e[ Inc,
`
`Indiana Cooggeretive_Q§gj§_:j3g__Sewices
`911?81Q2
`()<E3f§£8j2{3{}?' Autherigjg hQ§ffi_3.‘>f...
`Mark: INSPERE S#:?8'§.3??.325
`
`?89723?.S
`€,>6;’€)ai-IEEJO?
`
`indiana Ceoggerative Li{g_gj§_:j_g__Sem'ices Ant
`herity;
`Mark: INSPIRE §#:?8§‘?f232§
`
`gnsgirant Soiuticansg inc.
`§3__1__3;_‘_,‘g'__“gj_(_3_§_g
`QSJQEIEDG? Mark: ENSPIRAEW $$$:?SS’91_§,_§_§'_
`
`A.~S,tg§re Finemziai Co_zj;_g_:a,E;E_Q_Q_
`7?‘QGBi362
`i}5,."E)2,"2GCE? Mark: AU A?SF‘ERE UNIVERSE”?
`S#:7’7{3G8€.1=62
`
`Insggiratien Seftware, inc.
`Mark: INS§31RA’i'IC?E\3 $#:_§f'_{§__3_.11fi8E3
`R-#2176853.-*$
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN $#:?43113Cé6
`
`R#=£§,§f§$i__.Li..Z
`Mark: INSPEREDATA S#”:2_§_i3§§}Z§;_8_§
`Mark: 1i‘~§SF’IREi'.'3 S#:Z§_Z:;'_;’§;§Q_!;
`
`Insgiretien Softwarez inc.
`
`Insgération Seftwere, Inc,
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN S#:?4‘.-311685
`R#:1?‘68S14
`
`Mark: ENSPERATEDN §#:_3f’_43113s“.?6
`R#:18E=4117
`
`Eawsgiratien Software, Inc.
`
`?7£3{)3334 Afigire Financiai (:org;3eratien_
`05i()2i2i)£)‘? Mark: A-SPERE L!N}.'VERSIT‘{ §#:77GD3334
`
`Enzsggiratéan mftware, Inc.
`
`9117?G54
`E‘§S,»’L”.@2f2€)£}37
`
`Eiavid Codikew e_g§___;Q§ne Dufine
`_¥_3’_;u7§__f_‘_F‘,‘_E_‘_2_§!_’_§‘;‘_§_‘_i_§_,Q_{__:E"he Q; The
`Mark: KEEN-SPERIENCE $#:?365G_§_3_.,_§
`
`David fjediiww arj=_g‘_3___§;j~_§_s_{ja_§-,-*:_ Define Partnerahi
`‘,?8Sf3€)615
`G3,’2if2QE=7 ;g,___T§_e___
`Mark: KIi}—SPERIENCE S#:3_5_§_§§g_§3_§g_5_
`
`
`Ensggireti_@;3__;Software
`Inc,
`Mark: INSPIRATEQN $#:}’4;311é586
`R#:1?’t38514
`Mark: INSPERATIGN S#:743113{')6
`ee:1ee4:1 1::
`
`ease: KIDSPIRATH3-N ee:;_?§_ae5931
`ee-:27eee93
`
`
`Ia'asQiraE:ig_n___§pftware inc.
`
`, £1? '2
`
`9j'E?,*'2(3{I? 1:53 PM
`
`

`
`H..‘x_*1
`
`)1 5.1 L 51x3.) 7 ‘c-FL.»
`
`.1 l{i‘L£(LL£li15\.i‘\. J LE5! R! (5.3. X'}.§JiJC1J(l llL’(lLl.£ l'.l§§.{L$l}.~:f.n.
`
`um 3.,-.,-,2 u‘-:::.w m:.u::§,rw.Lt_~,u V; ucauv Lats,» v : in z-— 1942.3: :::§.;u
`
`Fmszreeding Btkefanfiantis),
`Fifiing mute Fmperty{§es}
`7859115?’
`
`Insgiraant Scsfutimns, Inc.
`Mark: INSPIRANT $$:?SS¥31 15?
`
`fnS§§rs.=,_€_.:_1___:;i;_»3SEGn
`Eic
`Mark: INSPIREEE DESIGN $#:?8655’0€-35
`
`John§_c_;_r_“_a 8:. Jmhnscm
`Mark: EVERYDAY ENSPIRATION
`§$$‘:'}'8S49'}'12
`
`Piaintiffisfi,
`Pw§er2y{§a5}
`Insgira§:_i__r,}_g___5oftware Inc,
`
`
`
`L’LSQ.3.€i;r’_3_3§.5
`
`
`on Software
`
`Insgiration Sceftw§_{;e:_. Inc.
`
`C1=3f21;’2£30?
`
`9l1?5’524~
`
`GIIEEJEGQ?
`
`?854~§.7l2§
`
`a2m2,»’2Q£37
`
`138724624-
`
`0 if}? l:’2€.§EZ}7
`
`73?ZJ"§§5
`
`1.“i.,f2{},"2€3Q6
`
`.785=SSOE:5
`
`1Q,f19;’2{}€35
`
`S‘1,1"?l__?:§_§§
`G?’;'05f?.{)CP6
`
`Refreshing__§3§gdu::ti::ms, inc,
`Mark: TRENSPIRATIDN §#:?8?24624
`
`Insgiratiar: S€.’.*fiZW':'i1E'E,_.__§_i_‘_‘:__f,_.___
`
`Fang, Tirnauthgg Maivin
`Mark: NSPIRED WBLICATIQNS
`S#:'}’8?2?§3£55
`
`Er1srgirati__r,_33___Softwar'e£ Ina.
`
`igggired ciasifin, iir:
`Mark: INSPIRED DESEGN S#:2§§§_§_§_Q§§
`
`Insgiratirzn Saftagaarei Inc.
`
`Kidsgirationai inc,”
`Mark: RHYMES 2 GRQW WITH
`3?? :_?_§§_§§3i;3{}‘5
`
`78366006
`
`{3 1f24!2G{3Es
`
`Kidsgzjfigationai Inc.
`Mark: RHYMES 2 GROW WITH
`
`S#:?8356E3G§
`
`?858§4€§£-3*
`
`Gi,’0€3;’;'Z{}€36
`
` a__
`Mark: ENSPHERED S#:?85894_§§
`
`S$__3__;_§:_:€_§_S_€§
`11;1<3,:2m:3s
`
`‘EDUCATIONAL BRQADCASTENG
`CORPQRAHGN
`
`378422143
`
`1 lflé/2085
`
`Mark: LEFE, ENSHRED S#:}_{§46897?
`
`Kids I!
`1r_3_:;_,___
`Mark: BRIGHT ENSPIRATIONS
`S~#:?8-'-E-22143
`
`_?'84€s8$_'$f’__?f’_
`{38,«"GE?;"2005
`
`91 1:':1S‘.F'E§5
`
`Q7_iO'7'_f2='J{35
`
`EDUCATICENAL _E3;_8\_QADCAS"HNG
`C{3R§3{3RA'}_'IQN
`Mark: LIFE, INSPIRED S-#:}’8#t-68$-§??
`
`Inspired Life Ministries Inc.
`Tr3§'.§€:'-SQ’:
`INSPIREEI) PARE:\§'f§"§#:?s4191.32
`
`E31 1856?’?
`
`O€=f1?;'20{}S
`
`Mark: TOYS THAT ENSPEPLE THE
`
`IMAGENATIQN §#:§{'_§{§_,7f_I§_3_;_§_
`
`§13..6L’§502
`
`{B5;’£‘8,12fiO5
`
`Nomi Lgarning-__§_:;_g*_nmxanitiesx Inc.
`Mark: INSPIRATIEEN .
`.
`. MOYIVATEON K
`EDUCATION §#:7839?°3<‘.3r’-E»
`
`.
`
`,
`
`Ifl5Q§i'{:iE§0!“‘: S§;__f_£;warefl Inc.
`
`Irasgiration Seftvsfgare inc;
`
`Ensggiratiun Saftware‘ _§_{_’z__a_;._m
`
`
`Ensggiration S-_3§_ftwar'e
`inc
`Mark: INSPERATICIN S#:?41-31 1386:
`R#:_;},_864i1?'
`
`yjggpiratien Softw;_a;_:_*_§, Inc,
`
`
`£nsgir§;_‘_c_i_§n Sioftware Ig3_§_,w
`Mark: INSPERATIGN S#:?43113QEe
`R#‘:185413.?
`
`
`INSPIRATEQN $53) FTWARE INC.
`Mm-5:: ENSPIRATEON $#:;z_«_4;.__3___3:16sa
`R#:_1__Z_§§51.4
`
`Insggiraticm Softwan=:,__;{_z3_g_.m
`
`Ins iratéon Seftwara inc.
`
`?age #1. £323 is page: ‘E
`
`_.'_P, 3 4 Next
`
`Resuils as as‘ DQIETEZDDT 01:53 PM
`
`Search agaén
`
`E JEGME § ENQEEXE SEARQH E eSUSii\iE$S E CONTACT US i PREVACY STATEMENT
`
`9f27a’2€3U’£’ 1:53 PM
`
`

`
`U531-“TD "£‘TA‘£§‘v’UE. Trademark Triai and Appeal Beard Inquiry”.
`
`ht£p:!ft&ahvue.uspt0.gc: v_fitab'vue;’v?;:-u= .-’é.f22ir3spiratio§¥§HiQEi¥A‘
`
` United States Patent and Trademark Gffice
`
`Home § Site Index §Searci*3 f isfuidees § Contacts E eaiiusineess E efiir aiertsi News E5-ieip
`
`
`
`TTABVUE. Trademark Triai and Appeai Beard inquiry System
`
`Summary
`
`Query: Party Name contains aii wordgz “Ei\£SPERAT'£=f.'3N SOFTWARE"
`Number of resuirsz 9?’
`
`Rasuirs are in reverse crrmriniagicai order
`
`Fage #2. Go tr: page: _Previous 1
`
`_:f:_ 55 Next
`
`Prcaceaading irefenriamtis),
`Fiiirsg {Liam Prrsperryiierfi
`91155538
`
`06;’ 1{),:’2OOS
`
`"E"ai'g<a~i: Brands: Inc.
`Mark: READ. BE INSPIRED. WRITE BACK
`$#:f/$335268
`
`378419132
`
`GEI31/ZEFDS
`
`
`§_r_1§piregi Life Miraiswieaa ‘inc.
`Mai-in INSPIRED raarrxrrs sr::?s41_g;g._§2:
`
`Piainrirfis},
`Pretepertyfiaas)
`
`Insggiratig_a__§oftware, Inc.
`
`Ensgiration Softwargi EH12‘
`
`INSPi'RATI€Ji\_i___§0FTWARE
`INC,
`Mark: INSPIRATION §#:?4311685
`R#:1?68514
`
`Erssairarimi So_if3;y_q_r-are, inc.
`
`
`§_g‘}_§pirat§cm Software ___§_i_@§_.__
`
`Insgiraticm Seftwarei IE‘_‘i_§i__:__
`
`;nsgir'a'i:ion Software, Eric.
`
`764372318
`
`{)3;’(}2;’2UOS
`
`783{3§3éi-33
`
`03/‘01f2{)05
`
`7783352638
`
`G3jfl1;’2i3i35
`
`?8397364
`
`03,10 1j2€)Q5
`
`9 1 1 64083
`
`01,:"25;'2Gi3S
`
`911§':1£’+3?4_
`{)1f2Sf2E§{3S
`
`9 1 1 64064
`
`iI31,«".'25fI2E)O5
`
`2_§_L_3_§_1892
`.1 if 313;’ 2004
`
`783SS820
`
`11;’30f20Q4
`
`§j_.__1__63Q28
`1 IKGSIEQQ4
`
`Mark: TQYS THAT ENSPIRE THE
`IMRGINATIQN §#375“3-72318
`
`Ins§girasis.=sa1__i,_i__r_r_;_ii:e:;i
`Maria: INSPIRASIAN s#:733oes433
`
`Target Branci$,___E__r_i_§.“_
`Mark: READ. BEE INSPERED. WRITE BACK
`§#:?8335268
`
`
`Ncabei Learning Cr2mm_g_gi_i_i:ies Eric.
`Mark: INSPIRATION .
`.
`. MOTIVATION .
`EEBUCATION 3-'#:?839}’364
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Teaaiier Insgirad Pr.3ci:ic:ai___§_ta.ii*fi Inc.
`Mark: T.LF‘.S. — TEACHER ENEPIRED
`PRACTECAL STUFF S#:?6S-‘@1636
`
`1_E§_§PIRATiON sorrxamas, INC.
`Mark: INSPERATEQN $$r:2_gi§_J;.__;686
`R#:1?'68S14
`
`ginsgireci euaarriing Tina
`Mark: INSPIRED ELEARNING EBEJCATEQN
`FDR YGUR ENTEEWRISE S-#:?'825‘E35GS
`
`-.-.—.._:—............-4l...............
`INSPIRATLQEELSOFTWARE INC.
`Mark: ENSPERATIQN $#:?4311fS85
`R-#:1?68S14
`
`Mark: PARENTS INSPIRATKON INSTITUTE
`5%?’-“:?6553§15
`
`
`Srsimeider Gar};
`Mark: INSPIRE 5#:78351.EE92
`
`Caesars Enggggrainment, Eric.
`Mark: BE ENSPIRED S#:_Z§_;_3__6582D
`
`FAVERGE Maumg S.
`Maria: INSPERIZED §#°:_Z_&}_;___;i_;8?3
`
`Inspiration Srzftwagjgi Inc.
`
`
`Insg_i_r__2_.a_tiv:>n Software Eric.
`
`1_i_\_iTRAiAi‘viER3:CA EiE_;g_U‘i"‘:’ NEWQRK INC
`
`Irisgiration Software __§_r_1_c“:;_
`
`
`insgirggign Software Inc.
`Mark: ENSPERATION 5#:74311€Eg§_Q
`R#:1?68514
`
`9.*'Ei7,"2Gi}? 1:53 FM
`
`

`
`J:«1*'JI;<,Z= £":',/-:.tW
`
`:i'racien":a:‘k Trial and Appeal Board Enquiry...
`
`http :£!itaE>vue.u5pto. gmr,fttaabv1teiv? pn==‘?‘;Z2im-pita
`
`?r:::ceedi:°:g Qefandantis),
`Fiiing Date Wapertyiies}
`?82S°35§3S
`
`13,/EOQGE34
`
`Ins§ire§§___eLear.ning Inc
`Mark: INSPIREQ ELEARNING EDUCATIQN
`FOR YQUR ENTERPRISE S#:?‘82S9SC35
`
`
`
`10,«"20i20Ci4
`
`Mark: PRRENTS INSPIRATIQN INSTETUTE
`S#‘:7=S>;'*3S3:’315
`
`Piaintiffis},
`Pmpartyiies}
`
`InsQiratior_a___§g;3ftwas'e
`Inc.___
`
`1NSPI_F__§EQ{ION SOE1f3§._ij§RE WC.
`Mark: INSPIRATION S#:74311:385
`R#:1?‘68S1<:
`
`Insggiragipn Softwarg1__j£_m:.
`
`Insgiratéongnftware, In<;_.___
`EN:-,?§3‘IF_i_g§‘3__"s_“_1._§;\J SC}:-'-':”}»_.1j»_,{;§‘5_E{u_!’:‘! INC.
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN S#:?%’431.:.686
`R#:17€>8514
`
`
`EnsQEra3g_t_i_g_§: Scaftware __§j_1_§__.__
`
`}’§354163{}
`
`1{3f2€3f2{){)4
`
`?{:35353'}'5
`
`l§3;’3Z{3;'20€I}<§
`
`91 1,§:3}.?G€3
`
`E}E§!E39,f2G£§4
`
`Mark: T.I.F-KS. — TEACHER INSPIRED
`PRACTISAL STUFF S#:?‘PSS4163{3
`
`_.3§j§3_§_'j_§:___.Xi Deita Fraternit
`Mark: INSPIRING WQMEN TC} REALEZE
`THEIR PCBTENTIAL §#:?’5§353‘,?5
`
`§U§d€QOS_§f_§_, a Church C()i"g€:ti‘_$_.=;:_§:_§_(:‘3__£:1__
`E N 3PI RATI_Q__N___§_Q FT\rVA§3_.f;‘_£___§_I_\_J_
`Mark: DAILY GUIEIJEPOSTS YOUR SGURCE Mark: ENSPERATIGN $#:?'fi-311686
`OF INSPERATION §#‘:?-é51fl27’}°
`R$:_3_._?_§8SI,€‘s-
`
`3781 128373
`
`G8;'{}S,"2G{}4
`
`FAVERO Maura, 5.
`Mark: INSPIRIZED S#:78i128?3
`
`Insgiration Seaftwarghinc.
`Mark: INSPIRATIGN S#:'?4311E_1_§i§
`R#:1?E'>851«:
`
`§;;§Q§§§
`asm3,:‘2m:4
`
`Weekiy ¥~‘«:eader Cmrg.
`Insgiratiam Ssftware. }§‘)__§_:__
`Mark: INSPIRE THE FUTLJRE S#:?821_§§§§_ Mark: INSE3IRf\‘§'ION §#:743116§§
`R#:l}’6B51-“~§~
`
`?:‘:32334{3§S
`
`OSi1?f20{F=i§
`
`gytggrmax. Inc.
`Mark: ENSPERE 5#:?f32334Q§_
`
`?'651G2?'}’
`
`€}5,»'10,f2G04
`
`5: Church {.‘.=;:rgora::i<3n_
`€5ui<j_§;_;;gg;sts:
`Mark: DAILY GUEDEPQSTS YCPLJRESQURCE
`OF INSPIRAHQN S#:?651(_}_§_£__Z_"{‘_
`
`§1;§Q§§§
`04;23;20@4
`
`Edwards Lifeggigncs Cargoratian
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN FROM LIFE FOR LEFE
`S#:?'823§£)18
`
`I3sC8F“_§§'_:CGE‘QC3$”E3ted
`Mark: ASPIRE $#:?4?2_§{:_Q_2;§3_ R#:.?;12-'§__7__§Z3__;3;
`Acer I:':-:;. am .*'3‘\tZ€£"£3_f_”]j‘5_t§§[}CE3 Cc>rg;o:j_.:g_§j_g([}_
`Ensgérzaigfian SGft\.'\.i_£_5__.?_’_g=;__,_ Inc,
`
`£E§§EB£EE§EL§§fl?1MARE l§§;
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN §#°:;'{_z_1__3 71.1686
`R#:1?‘68S3.t:~
`
`inagiratierz Software Inc,
`
`§;;§Q;Q§
`e3;29;20a4
`
`78215859
`
`u3;05;2aa4
`
`911SS§417
`
`C}2,r'£§2;’2€3E34
`
`The Mas‘aueriL;e____E*§tersen Foundatiazan
`Mark: ENSPERATIGN PO1NTS#:?fi438186
`
`§NSP’T.RAT'£0i\£ SQFTW;\RE: INC.
`
`Weekifg Reacggg Csarg,
`Errsggiratiun Software! Inc.
`Mark: ENSFIRE THE FUTURE S#:?82158S‘3 Mark: ENSPIRATION S#:_E<$311536
`R#ilZ§§§$§
`
`Insggired Leag Can;-:uPtir§g3___1nc.
`Mark: INSPIRED LEAP S#:?’8;?;12?§4
`
`INSPIRATIQN SQFT§§{_.4_’3\RE{ INC
`
`Page #32. $0 to page: Previous 1
`
`_§3__§ Next
`
`Resuiis as of 99131239? 01:53 PM
`
`Search again
`
`3
`
`.HC3:°:‘sE 3
`
`!NDE3(§ SEARCH E eBLiS3NE3S E CQNTACZT US E PREVACY STAYEMENT
`
`9:’2'.7'f?.{3€}?' 1:53 PM
`
`

`
`~.~'-.1.-L 4 x.,.-
`
`_s ;; an a Let...
`
`.x:u\..\\...unca;uL\
`
`x ;1u1 (ihlki 1’)?-'E.)'i'.(.L1 uuuau 1.1 Lk..1!..ill.l}Im.
`
`: n.L!.;.;,v z.m:.w u<:.L.m}2Lu.5u vi um.;v w::,- v :54-1;- .IOL.£_1llb}Ji1vz1i.lUE§?h‘ibfi.t3A
`
` Unifieti Stams Patent and Trademark {Bffice
`
`Rome Efiite inciexmearch§-Eiuidsas:ittuntactsiafiusinessfiefiiz aieertsmewsifieip
`
`
`
`TTASVUE. Trademark Trfiai and Appaai Beard inquiry System
`
`Summary
`
`Query: ?‘arty Name cemtains aii words: “INSP1RA”E'IQN SOF‘fWARE"
`Numher szwf resssitss 97
`
`Resuits are in reverse chranaiagicai cmfier
`
`Page #3. $9 in gage: _¥3;j§_vious _; 3: 33
`
`5%; Next
`
`Pmcaefiing Defenfiaantfis),
`Fifiéng flats Pmpertyiiag}
`
`"EESSEGBS4
`
`Ffiafintiffls},
`Frcspertyiies)
`
`
`Ii’\3S§*1RATIQN___S;_§;)F"§"WARE INC
`
`
`
`INSPIRATIQN SOFTWARE INC
`
`Enaggiratien $_g_ff;_ware, Inc.
`
`§_§_ .__§_§§¢
`INSEDIRATION S€)F‘Ei_.:_3{_.§§R.E ENC.
`
`EN;‘SF‘IRA"E"I{)N S:2(}FTW§§_§_-“_{__E. ENC.
`
`gggggiration Saftware. Inc
`
`INSPIRATEDN Si)?’-"i"\?\f_g?g_§R_._§, INC
`
`ENSPIRATION S(I§E""TW;§§_3§§, ENC.
`Mark: INSPIRATIGN $#:?4311586
`R#:17'5§§_1_f_«’zr__
`INSPERRTEON SQFTWARE INC.
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN S#:_?4-311585
`R#:1?58514
`
`Insgiration Sfiftwarag Inc
`
`Ensgiratism Soft»xr§;_s;§.__Inc
`Mark: ENSPIRATTQN S#:‘?431168é:“s
`R-3$’:__1___3_"__é_33j8S 14
`
`Ii\‘__€.:_,__
`§__E§§_¥_’__E_§_§£3sTE{I3N SSE-'-'TW'ARE,
`Mark: ENSPIRATEGN $#‘:_f§_311586
`R#:1?f58S14
`
`ENSPIRATION s_g_g§j{v\:.:-aka. ENC.
`Mark: INsmR.<m:::>N s#:?'4311§~.§§
`R#:1.’?68;‘514
`
`Insgyratirm Sofi;ware,_§_r_3g;,___
`
`G1f23f2C3Q-4
`78153192
`
`C*1f23f2{}G4
`
`178239318
`
`C3l,¢’22/'2i}Ei4
`
`Z§_$_3_§;__8;.§
`12,:22;‘2:::{>3
`
`91 1589534
`
`12;'19,v’20Q3
`91 158E345
`
`l2_;'i5,f2{){B3
`?8212?94
`
`1 150312033
`
`Edwards Life-szziencs C~:>rgQrat_i_g;s__r_L
`Mark; INSPERATIELIN FROM LEFE FOR LIFE
`S#:?823’£§€318
`
`The Marguerite Petersen Faundation
`Mark: INSPIRATEQN POENT S#:3'__§_{§_;3_§__‘__1_§§§
`Inzfiaoks inc.
`Mark: INSPERATIQN CENTER S#:}’5~’§»68188
`
`Scott Lari Jiii
`
`Mark: KIUSFIRQTIONAL S#:?62980-44
`
`Insgired Leag Cemsuiting Em;
`Mark: INSPERED LEAF-‘ S#:1E$__3§_‘_;i__2_?,_§{_i-}_{§_
`
`:”L1__1__5_8...1...4...0..
`1 :3; 1 352003
`
`Whirigooi Pre3gemes: In_c__,__
`Mark: INSPERIENCE S#:?‘816394?
`
`91138146
`
`1£§!{}8,r’2E){33
`
`91 1 58892
`
`1€}f(3fif?.{3fi3
`
`91 158093
`
`1()[G5,i'2{3€33
`
`91158119
`
`1Gf€.36;’2EP(}3
`
`91158145
`
`1G,f£)6j2OG3
`
`Mark: SPEREMEEBIA $#:2__‘;§§_G8 140
`
`Leszynski G:“_§3_g;_{_3_,___.Em:.
`Mark: Ei\i5PIRE S#:?81?6358
`
`Mitten Gr‘oug:. Inc. The
`Mark: ASPERE. INSPIRE. §‘=#:_}f=534iZ348(}1
`
`Mark: INSPIRE INTERNATIONAL ENC.
`S#:76441lf.P8
`
`Ensgiriragg SQ§U§_§__§§_fJ_§: inc.
`Mark: INSPIRENKE SOLUTIONS
`§#:?’t'i3B49=9‘e~£§
`
`_‘_3__11S8G'}“‘3
`{39f29;’20fi3
`
`Rog, Dabra E.
`Mark: ENSPIRINGS S-#:?‘54S85?S
`
`~"..3
`
`3*.)
`
`9;’27:’20{)?' 1:53 PM
`
`

`
`L155!at) ’§'{’Ai;W U 2:1. ‘.E’radema rk Trizai and Appeai Board in-1:;a,1ir_;r..;
`
`httpzfftta1'wL::3.Lzs pfxt:-.gavfttabvuefv? ;3z\=‘}'322inspirati¢EK'£'Eb_l:E§9s
`
`Qrmzeefiing D&far:dant{§),.
`Fifiing Ersata Prnperwfiiesg
`
`Pfiaintiffifi,
`Property{Ees}
`
`In2Boc:ksg Inc.
`?..1“i.-‘E.3£&§
`{)9/29,:’2E3£}3 Mark: INS¥3'IRATIC)N CENTER S#’:?6468.‘L84
`
`Sc-cat: L0rE Jiii
`
`3’629804-4
`
`Enggiraticm Softvjgggreg Inc. §Insg3ir‘atic::j_a_‘}___
`
`
`_E_g_§Q_i_gjation Saftware Inc
`
`09,"22;’2{}03
`
`‘}'54€38188
`
`fl’3é,:’i5!2C3€L'3
`
`91 15781 3
`
`DE-3‘,/i3Bf2C303
`
`911.S?'?'69
`
`GQXEPBXEQOE
`
`76418523
`
`Mark: KEDSPIRATIQNAL S#:?‘6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket