`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA172489
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`11/01/2007
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91175524
`Plaintiff
`Inspiration Software, Inc.
`David P. Cooper
`Kolisch Hartwell, P.C.
`520 S.W. Yamhill Street, Suite 200
`Portland, OR 97204
`UNITED STATES
`coop@khpatent.com
`Opposition/Response to Motion
`David P. Cooper
`mandi@khpatent.com,cooper@khpatent.com
`/david p. cooper/
`11/01/2007
`20071101 Opposer's Opposition to Applicant's Motion for Summary
`Judgment.pdf ( 8 pages )(113058 bytes )
`Exhibit A Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment 9-27-07.pdf ( 30 pages
`)(1194831 bytes )
`Opp 1st set of Interrogatories 8-22-07.pdf ( 12 pages )(150767 bytes )
`Opp 1st Set of Req for Admissions 8-22-07.pdf ( 4 pages )(108818 bytes )
`Opp. 1st Req for Production of Docs 8-22-07.pdf ( 5 pages )(114164 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No. 91175524
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION
`TO APPLlCANT’S MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`INSPIRATION SOFTWARE, INC.
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`INSPIRED DESIGN, LLC
`
`Applicant.
`
`Attn: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`S i r :
`
`\_/\_/\_/\./\./\_/\_/\_/
`
`)
`
`Introduction
`
`For reasons which follow, opposer Inspiration Software, Inc. requests that the Board deny
`
`App|icant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“App|icant’s SJ Motion”) filed on September 27, 2007.
`
`The Board should deny app|icant’s motion because there are genuine issues of material
`
`fact concerning most of the pertinent factors upon which the Board makes a |ike|ihood-of-
`
`confusion (“LOC”) determination. Genuine issues of material fact exist concerning at least the
`
`following LOC factors: similarity of the marks, goods/services, trade channels, strength of the
`
`mark, and app|icant’s intent in choosing the mark.
`
`In addition to the above reasons, opposer
`
`requests that the Board deny App|icant’s SJ Motion because it is premature. Opposer should be
`
`allowed to receive app|icant’s responses to opposer’s discovery requests, and to othenNise
`
`proceed with the opposition through testimony periods and final briefing.
`
`Prior to testimony
`
`periods, opposer is not required to “demonstrate the damage likely to accrue as a result” of
`
`app|icant’s registration.
`
`Page 1
`
`-
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`On October 1, 2007, opposer received App|icant’s SJ Motion and APPL|CANT’S BRIEF IN
`
`SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (“App|icant’s Supporting Brief”).
`
`App|icant’s Supporting Brief is attached as Exhibit A, and it includes a one-page Introduction
`
`followed by what appear to be three or four exhibits. Following the Introduction are several pages
`
`from the USPTO website that include a listing of other oppositions naming opposer. There is no
`
`coversheet to this document. Next follows a cover sheet entitled Exhibit B followed by the
`
`Declaration of Michele Behrenwald (“the Behrenwald Declaration”), president and owner of
`
`applicant. Another coversheet entitled Exhibit C follows with what appears to be a copy of
`
`applicants federal trademark-service mark application for INSPIRED DESIGN. Then, there is a
`
`coversheet for Exhibit D with what appears to be a copy of opposer’s Notice of Opposition for the
`
`present opposition.
`
`Referring to Exhibit A, there is no discussion of the pertinent law and caselaw, and there is
`
`no application of law to facts. There is also no Certificate of Service. Opposer is assuming Nov.
`
`1, 2007 is the deadline for opposition of App|icant’s SJ Motion based upon the 9-27-07 date
`
`app|icant’s attorney signed that motion, thereby allowing opposer 30 days plus five extra days for
`
`mail service.
`
`Opposer is somewhat at a loss to understand the legal basis for app|icant’s SJ Motion, but
`
`it will respond below as best that it can.
`
`Exhibit D to App|icant’s Supporting Brief provides
`
`opposer’s allegations, and Exhibit C provides app|icant’s application. Opposer does not
`
`understand how either of these is relevant to a summary judgment ruling. Opposer also does not
`
`understand the significance of the summary pages that appear to be from the USPTO website
`
`and list oppositions naming opposer.
`
`App|icant’s only testimonial support for its assertion that there are no genuine issues of
`
`material fact exist and summmary judgment is proper is offered by app|icant’s president and
`
`Page 2 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`owner, testimony that cannot possibly be persuasive due to its inherent bias. Nonetheless, the
`
`Behrenwald Declaration includes app|icant’s legal conclusion that opposer’s and app|icant’s marks
`
`are different, their goods and services are different, and that pertinent consumers would not be
`
`confused.
`
`Notably, and in contrast
`
`to the Notice of Opposition,
`
`the Behrenwald contests that
`
`opposer’s trademark/service mark rights are limited to the goods/services recited in opposer’s
`
`federal registrations listed in paragraphs 3 and 4 of that Notice of Opposition.
`
`In so doing,
`
`applicant dismisses opposer’s other trademark/service mark rights in its family of marks including
`
`its INSPIREDATA mark, and its INSPIRED mark (see paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition), as well as dismisses the broad scope of protection opposer believes it has based
`
`upon paragraphs 2, 7 and 9 of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`Nowhere does applicant mention that it has filed App|icant’s SJ Motion during an extension
`
`period granted by opposer to respond to Opposer’s discovery requests,unsigned copies of which
`
`are attached collectively as Exhibit B. Those discovery requests include a first set of Requests for
`
`Production of Documents,
`
`lnterrogatories, and Requests for Admission. Opposer granted the
`
`extension twice to further settlement discussions. Applicant apparently decided instead to file
`
`App|icant’s SJ Motion to leverage settlement.
`
`If the Board denies App|icant’s SJ Motion, opposer
`
`and reinstates the proceedings it susepnded by Order dated October 4, 2007, opposer will be able
`
`to receive app|icant’s discovery responses by resetting a new deadline with applicant.
`
`Facts
`
`The present opposition involves applicant’s mark INSPIRED DESIGN for “books in the
`
`field of business management and operation; books in the field of personal development; religious
`
`books; gifts, namely picture books, story books, flash cards, children’s books, blank journal books,
`
`and decals; greeting cards; pictures; paintings,
`
`in International Class 16; games, namely board
`
`Page 3 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`games and card games; toys, namely pet toys,
`
`in International Class 28; consulting services in
`
`new business start-up, business organization and management, and product and business-
`
`services development; auctioneering,
`
`in International Class 35 educational services, namely
`
`conducting seminars, workshops, lectures and classes in the fields of leadership, management,
`
`personal development, entrepreneurism,
`
`invention and creativity, educational services, namely,
`
`one-on-one mentoring in the field of career management; career counseling; charitable services,
`
`namely, educational mentoring and development of youth; operating instructions camps for youth,
`
`in
`
`International Class 41; and providing information on techniques for
`
`improving personal
`
`creativity; personal growth and motivation consulting services; personal
`
`lifestyle consulting
`
`services, in International Class 45”.
`
`Applicant filed its intent-to-use application on June 21, 2005 and is accorded that date as
`
`its priority date if it uses the mark and files a Statement of Use evidencing that use in the required
`
`time period. As noted in opposer’s Notice of Opposition, opposer owns U.S. trademark and
`
`service mark registrations for the mark INSPIRATION. Opposer’s INSPIRATION mark is used for
`
`the following goods and services: computer programs in the field of idea development through
`
`visual diagramming, outlining and text creation,
`
`in International Class 9; computer education
`
`training, in International Class 41; and computer software design for others, in International Class
`
`42.
`
`Opposer’s market is the education market, which includes K-12, colleges, universities, and
`
`the adult education industry including corporate training and lifelong learning. Opposer also owns
`
`allowed U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 78/734,800 for the mark INSPIRED for “computer
`
`software for use as a writing tool
`
`in education, home and business”. Opposer’s use of
`
`INSPIRATION is senior to app|icant’s priority date for INSPIRED DESIGN, and opposer’s other
`
`applications for INSPIRED and INSPIREDATA form a family of marks that provide a broad scope
`
`Page 4 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`of trademark/service mark protection.
`
`Argument
`
`Referring to Exhibit A, App|icant’s Supporting Brief fails to show that genuine issues of
`
`material fact are not in dispute. To the contrary, the Behrenwald Declaration is essentially like
`
`app|icant’s answer, including the opinions of app|icant’s president and founder about the merits of
`
`the opposition.
`
`Opposer disagrees with app|icant’s approach, and urges the Board to allow the opposition
`
`to continue based upon the allegations in opposer’s Notice of Opposition, and based upon the
`
`genuine issues of material
`
`fact
`
`that exist concerning the likelihood-of-confusion (LOC)
`
`determination.
`
`First, applicant has a difficult burden because it must show the Board there are no genuine
`
`issues of material fact.
`
`According to the Board, the following standards apply to motions for summaryjudgment:
`
`Generally, summary judgment is appropriate in cases where the moving party
`establishes that there are no genuine issues of material fact which require
`resolution at trial and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 56(c). An issue is material when its resolution would affect the outcome of
`the proceeding under governing law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.
`242, 248 (1986). However, a dispute over a fact which would not alter the
`Board's decision on the legal issue will not prevent entry of summary judgment.
`See, for example, Kellogg Co. v. Pack’Em Enterprises Inc., 951 F.3d 330, 21
`USPQ2d 1142 (Fed. Circ. 1991 ). A fact is genuinely in dispute if the evidence of
`record is such that a reasonable fact finder could return a verdict in favor of the
`
`nonmoving party. See LIoyd’s Food Products Inc. v. EIi’s Inc., 987 F.2d 766, 25
`USPQ2d 2027 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The nonmoving party must be given the benefit
`of all reasonable doubt as to whether genuine issues of material fact exist, and
`the evidentiary record on summary judgment,
`including all
`inferences to be
`drawn from the undisputed facts, must be viewed in the light most favorable to
`the nonmoving party. See Ogrvland USA, Inc. v. Great American Music Show,
`Inc., 970 F.2d 847, 23 USPQ2d 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1992). O/de Tvme Foods Inc. v.
`Roundv’s Inc., 961 F.2d 200, 22 USPQ2d 1542 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
`
`Chesapeake Bank v. Chesapeake Bank of Maryland, 2004 TTAB Lexis 49 (TTAB 2004).
`
`Under the pertinent standard, the Board should deny App|icant’s SJ Motion because there
`
`Page 5 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`are genuine issues of material fact involving most of the thirteen factors the Board uses to make a
`
`likelihood-of-confusion determination. See, In re E.
`
`I. duPont deNemours & C0,, 476 F.2d 1357,
`
`177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).
`
`Among the duPont factors for which there are genuine issues of material fact, the following
`
`are possibly the most critical to the Board’s determination:
`
`(i) similarity of the marks, (ii) similarity of the parties’ goods/services; (iii) similarity of the
`
`parties’ trade channels; (iv) the strength of opposer’s mark; and (v) app|icant’s intent in choosing
`
`the mark.
`
`As described above, opposer is a senior user of INSPIRATION and has a family-of-marks
`
`argument
`
`relative to its other marks
`
`INSPIREDATA and INSPIRED.
`
`App|icant’s goods
`
`identification/services recitation is broad enough to pose a trademark problem with respect to
`
`opposer’s trademark/service mark rights
`
`in
`
`|NSP|RAT|ON,|NSP|REDATA and INSPIRED.
`
`Opposer owns prior rights in its INSPIRATION and has a family of marks that includes the marks
`
`INSPIREDATA and INSPIRED. App|icant’s INSPIRED DESIGN mark is confusingly similar to
`
`opposer’s marks. Under 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b), opposer INSPIRATION registrations are prima facie
`
`evidence that opposer owns its marks and has the right
`
`to use them in commerce. Those
`
`registrations also carry a presumption of damage from registration of a confusingly similar mark
`
`like app|icant’s INSPIRED DESIGN mark.
`
`Second, with respect to the merits, and in contrast
`
`to app|icant’s “evidence” in the
`
`Behrenwald Declaration, opposer’s INSPIRATION mark is famous within its industry, and should
`
`be entitled to a broad scope of protection. App|icant’s mark is similar to opposer’s registered
`
`INSPIRATION mark.
`
`App|icant’s goods/services are also related to opposer’s goods/services based upon the
`
`broadly worded goods identification/services recitation present in app|icant’s published application.
`
`Page 6 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`In addition, for purposes of App|icant’s SJ Motion, that goods identification/services recitation
`
`means app|icant’s goods/services are marketed similarly to opposer’s since there is no market
`
`restriction in it.
`
`Consistent with the notice pleading principle of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as
`
`adopted by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, opposer has alleged facts sufficient to support
`
`this proceeding. Further, as noted above, there are genuine issues of material fact concerning
`
`several key LOC factors such as similarity of the marks, goods/services and trade channels,
`
`strength of opposer’s mark, and applicants intent in choosing her mark.
`
`Accordingly, the Board should deny app|icant’s motion for summary judgment and let the
`
`oppostion continue.
`
`Dated: November 1, 2007.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CERTIFICATION UNDER 37 C.F.R.
`
`1.8
`
`KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C.
`
`I hereby certify that OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO
`APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT is being filed electronically with the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office via the
`Electronic System for Trademark Trials and
`Appeals this 1st day of November, 2007.
`
`/David p_ Coogefl
`David P_ Cooper
`
`/David p_ Coopefl
`David P Cooper
`Re istration No 33 372
`g
`'
`’
`Of Attorneys for Opposer
`_
`_
`520 S.W. Yamhlll Street, Suite 200
`
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 224-6655
`Facsimile: (503)295-6679
`
`Page 7 -
`
`OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
`Opposition No. 91175524; Our File - CS|.470OPP
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing OPPOSER’S OPPOSITION
`
`TO APPL|CANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT was served on applicant, by service
`
`on its attorneys Jeffrey A. Nelson and Michael B. O’Nea| of Warner Norcross & Judd LLP,
`
`located at 900 Fifth Third Center, 111 Lyon Street, N.W., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503-2487
`
`by emailing the same on November 1, 2007 and mailing the same via first class mail, postage
`
`prepaid, in a sealed envelope to the aforementioned address on November 2, 2007.
`
`/David P. Cooperl
`David P. Cooper
`Of Attorneys for Opposer
`
`Page 1
`
`-
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`EN THE UN§'E‘EB STATES PATENT ANE} ”E"F';ADE1WA.RK QFFECE
`BEFGRE THE TRs%.DEMAR§{ TREAL ANE} AFPEAL B€I§.!§RB
`
`
`
`
`
`w\H S A
`
`
`Qppositim No; 911'?5S2«'-1
`
`T:
`
`) )
`
`}
`
`) 3
`
`)
`
`Ensgzsiratiim Scftware, Imt.
`
`Cgngaaser,
`
`V.
`
`inspired (it-:si(3n, El:
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`AP?LICANT’S TEON FQR SEE’ JUBGMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Appiicam iuspireci desifin, Hie (“s§;J§iis‘:ant”), by and ihrough its attomeys Wamer
`
`Norcrcrss
`
`Judd LLP, hereby moves for smnrnary judgment pursuant to 3'? CFR § 2,12?‘ and
`
`Fads}. R. Civ. P. 55. As set fzsrth in the attached briefi the cppositian af Upposar inspiraiim
`
`Software.‘ inc. {“{3§)pusa£r’“} shmxld be dismissefi becamse-*2, as 3, mattar Qf flaw and fact, there is me
`
`iikelihoed (sf COE‘ifLESi{)i‘1 Emtween the Appiicarifis Mark and Opgmserh Mark.
`
`Dai,s':: Sgspztember 27", 2&0?
`
`Re:;;:=ectfuEIy subnxiited,
`
`inspired desiifin, 11::
`
`By: Wamer Norcmss & Judd LLE’
`
`
`§g_’__;’§jichaei B. G’N§_:«;_1
`.3¢=:ffery A. Neisora
`Michael B. CP"‘NeaE
`
`9% Fifth Third Center
`
`1 E3 Lynn Strazet,
`Grand Rapids, Michigan 495=I}3 «X487
`63 s§«7S2»2{}C=€3
`
`Attorney's fox Applicant
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`EN TE-EE E_}NE’i‘E1i1° STATES i’_fiiTENT AND TRi=§i.[3EM.ARi{ GFFECE
`£BEF{3RE 'E°i~iE TRAE‘5EMA}3ii<{ TEEIAL AND APPEAL EUARE
`
`inspiration Software, inc.
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`inspired desifin, lie.
`
`Appiiczirit,
`
`{I3;3_posiiioi*i 1\3i'2.: 9i i?S5ZZ~’1
`
`
`
`E'NTRfii_‘§ UC’E‘.i€l°i‘€
`
`Appiicani inspired dcsiifiii, Eic {“‘Apgiiia:ani"} Sfifiiifi is: register is mark INSPIRED
`i)ESi’(}N fer rciigiaus,
`;::ei’s0nai ciaveiopmant and imsinass managsmerii, gocids and aervices,
`iligigimser inspirmiian S:3fi.w:ire, inc. (“G§pese:"’} ciaims that "iiléi FNWRED DESEGN mark wiii
`iikeiy cause: itoiifusiitsii with Opposesfs .iNSPiii3;A'1"I{)i\i mark, which riiaric is used in connection
`with compgiiiiar pmgriimniing and compuiésr education, A3 set Earth below? Qppoixiefs basis fer
`epposiiig the registratien iacks any merit whaisaever. Tim niarics am :30 -Liissimiiar in appearazica,
`smmeii and conimiatimi
`that ihere art‘: no issues of fact in-:gar:‘Eii1_g that
`issm: of iikaiiihmd 01°
`::.oii.fiisi0n.
`ikiiorecver,
`tiia goods and services with whicsii the parties use their marks are so
`differani in miiiiie: that coiifusioii is 'iiiiiii~:.eiy to remit Fran: the mnteiiipnraneeus use ariftiizz niarks
`in connection with Siich goads and sewices. As::c0r<;iingiy, Appiicaait is entitieii ic: suminaiy
`judgnierit undiar 3? {'.‘.FR 53 2.12? and Fed. R. Civ. P, 56 because there:
`is no iii~;e.iihmi_i {if
`confusion b('3iZV'v’€§3I} Appiicaiifs mia.ri~; and Gpposefs marks as a E'1”iEJ,iZ'i>‘31‘ oifaci anti iaw.
`
`‘v
`
`
`
`\ai..»A A \,_; 4 ,g ; 1.5:
`
`e am. a L\1\A\aLAl'|.l£. n\
`
`1 . ;u,x.s s..L.H.'>.A .4 x§.r‘.c'>.-us.» A.<"\:Q-In us un.1zs.u1 y .u
`
`anu.r~.‘a; L.‘.L.nJ.$J u u\..s..:..)?JL\J.!5u 1r_; u..Mu v u\.; v . kill 1" .iU&...{....i.li».‘!iJXL
`
`
`
`United Stetee Patent and Trademark Qffiee
`
`Heme §Site Index §§earr:h Eeuisies § Centactsieausiness E gen; eiertsi News ifieiga
`
`
`
`'E'TAB‘\iEJE. Trademark ‘Triei and Appeei Beard Enquiry System
`
`Semeeery
`
`Query: Farty Name contains aii ward:-3: "'E3\ESPIRAT1QN SQFTWARE“
`Number ef reeufite: 97
`
`Reeeite ere in reverse chrenefiegicei erder
`
`fiege #1. Ge te page: E1
`
`2 3 4 Next
`
`fimeeeding Eefeedersfis},
`Féiing mete Fmeerwiiee}
`
`3’8?348()i§
`C§Sffl4;"2GD?
`
`
`?866{):348
`Ccdikew {David
`G7,"{}E":,i2{3G? Mark: i<ID—-SPERIENCE S-'#':?86€:‘>{)548
`
`Neintiffis),
`Freeertwfiee}
`
`Ensgiration Seftware; Em;
`Meek‘: INSPIREEE S§:?8734-800
`
`
`Insggiratiers S€.’3fi2\.g“_s,;'_§_E§_E_”_§_, Inn
`
`Sahei, Ruchika
`‘?8Sé3‘?‘.‘?S4
`GEIZBXEGG7 Mark: INSPIRED CHILE 5#:?885?784
`
`EnsQEr_§_i:}_g_n___5aftwas“e[ Inc,
`
`Indiana Cooggeretive_Q§gj§_:j3g__Sewices
`911?81Q2
`()<E3f§£8j2{3{}?' Autherigjg hQ§ffi_3.‘>f...
`Mark: INSPERE S#:?8'§.3??.325
`
`?89723?.S
`€,>6;’€)ai-IEEJO?
`
`indiana Ceoggerative Li{g_gj§_:j_g__Sem'ices Ant
`herity;
`Mark: INSPIRE §#:?8§‘?f232§
`
`gnsgirant Soiuticansg inc.
`§3__1__3;_‘_,‘g'__“gj_(_3_§_g
`QSJQEIEDG? Mark: ENSPIRAEW $$$:?SS’91_§,_§_§'_
`
`A.~S,tg§re Finemziai Co_zj;_g_:a,E;E_Q_Q_
`7?‘QGBi362
`i}5,."E)2,"2GCE? Mark: AU A?SF‘ERE UNIVERSE”?
`S#:7’7{3G8€.1=62
`
`Insggiratien Seftware, inc.
`Mark: INS§31RA’i'IC?E\3 $#:_§f'_{§__3_.11fi8E3
`R-#2176853.-*$
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN $#:?43113Cé6
`
`R#=£§,§f§$i__.Li..Z
`Mark: INSPEREDATA S#”:2_§_i3§§}Z§;_8_§
`Mark: 1i‘~§SF’IREi'.'3 S#:Z§_Z:;'_;’§;§Q_!;
`
`Insgiretien Softwarez inc.
`
`Insgération Seftwere, Inc,
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN S#:?4‘.-311685
`R#:1?‘68S14
`
`Mark: ENSPERATEDN §#:_3f’_43113s“.?6
`R#:18E=4117
`
`Eawsgiratien Software, Inc.
`
`?7£3{)3334 Afigire Financiai (:org;3eratien_
`05i()2i2i)£)‘? Mark: A-SPERE L!N}.'VERSIT‘{ §#:77GD3334
`
`Enzsggiratéan mftware, Inc.
`
`9117?G54
`E‘§S,»’L”.@2f2€)£}37
`
`Eiavid Codikew e_g§___;Q§ne Dufine
`_¥_3’_;u7§__f_‘_F‘,‘_E_‘_2_§!_’_§‘;‘_§_‘_i_§_,Q_{__:E"he Q; The
`Mark: KEEN-SPERIENCE $#:?365G_§_3_.,_§
`
`David fjediiww arj=_g‘_3___§;j~_§_s_{ja_§-,-*:_ Define Partnerahi
`‘,?8Sf3€)615
`G3,’2if2QE=7 ;g,___T§_e___
`Mark: KIi}—SPERIENCE S#:3_5_§_§§g_§3_§g_5_
`
`
`Ensggireti_@;3__;Software
`Inc,
`Mark: INSPIRATEQN $#:}’4;311é586
`R#:1?’t38514
`Mark: INSPERATIGN S#:743113{')6
`ee:1ee4:1 1::
`
`ease: KIDSPIRATH3-N ee:;_?§_ae5931
`ee-:27eee93
`
`
`Ia'asQiraE:ig_n___§pftware inc.
`
`, £1? '2
`
`9j'E?,*'2(3{I? 1:53 PM
`
`
`
`H..‘x_*1
`
`)1 5.1 L 51x3.) 7 ‘c-FL.»
`
`.1 l{i‘L£(LL£li15\.i‘\. J LE5! R! (5.3. X'}.§JiJC1J(l llL’(lLl.£ l'.l§§.{L$l}.~:f.n.
`
`um 3.,-.,-,2 u‘-:::.w m:.u::§,rw.Lt_~,u V; ucauv Lats,» v : in z-— 1942.3: :::§.;u
`
`Fmszreeding Btkefanfiantis),
`Fifiing mute Fmperty{§es}
`7859115?’
`
`Insgiraant Scsfutimns, Inc.
`Mark: INSPIRANT $$:?SS¥31 15?
`
`fnS§§rs.=,_€_.:_1___:;i;_»3SEGn
`Eic
`Mark: INSPIREEE DESIGN $#:?8655’0€-35
`
`John§_c_;_r_“_a 8:. Jmhnscm
`Mark: EVERYDAY ENSPIRATION
`§$$‘:'}'8S49'}'12
`
`Piaintiffisfi,
`Pw§er2y{§a5}
`Insgira§:_i__r,}_g___5oftware Inc,
`
`
`
`L’LSQ.3.€i;r’_3_3§.5
`
`
`on Software
`
`Insgiration Sceftw§_{;e:_. Inc.
`
`C1=3f21;’2£30?
`
`9l1?5’524~
`
`GIIEEJEGQ?
`
`?854~§.7l2§
`
`a2m2,»’2Q£37
`
`138724624-
`
`0 if}? l:’2€.§EZ}7
`
`73?ZJ"§§5
`
`1.“i.,f2{},"2€3Q6
`
`.785=SSOE:5
`
`1Q,f19;’2{}€35
`
`S‘1,1"?l__?:§_§§
`G?’;'05f?.{)CP6
`
`Refreshing__§3§gdu::ti::ms, inc,
`Mark: TRENSPIRATIDN §#:?8?24624
`
`Insgiratiar: S€.’.*fiZW':'i1E'E,_.__§_i_‘_‘:__f,_.___
`
`Fang, Tirnauthgg Maivin
`Mark: NSPIRED WBLICATIQNS
`S#:'}’8?2?§3£55
`
`Er1srgirati__r,_33___Softwar'e£ Ina.
`
`igggired ciasifin, iir:
`Mark: INSPIRED DESEGN S#:2§§§_§_§_Q§§
`
`Insgiratirzn Saftagaarei Inc.
`
`Kidsgirationai inc,”
`Mark: RHYMES 2 GRQW WITH
`3?? :_?_§§_§§3i;3{}‘5
`
`78366006
`
`{3 1f24!2G{3Es
`
`Kidsgzjfigationai Inc.
`Mark: RHYMES 2 GROW WITH
`
`S#:?8356E3G§
`
`?858§4€§£-3*
`
`Gi,’0€3;’;'Z{}€36
`
` a__
`Mark: ENSPHERED S#:?85894_§§
`
`S$__3__;_§:_:€_§_S_€§
`11;1<3,:2m:3s
`
`‘EDUCATIONAL BRQADCASTENG
`CORPQRAHGN
`
`378422143
`
`1 lflé/2085
`
`Mark: LEFE, ENSHRED S#:}_{§46897?
`
`Kids I!
`1r_3_:;_,___
`Mark: BRIGHT ENSPIRATIONS
`S~#:?8-'-E-22143
`
`_?'84€s8$_'$f’__?f’_
`{38,«"GE?;"2005
`
`91 1:':1S‘.F'E§5
`
`Q7_iO'7'_f2='J{35
`
`EDUCATICENAL _E3;_8\_QADCAS"HNG
`C{3R§3{3RA'}_'IQN
`Mark: LIFE, INSPIRED S-#:}’8#t-68$-§??
`
`Inspired Life Ministries Inc.
`Tr3§'.§€:'-SQ’:
`INSPIREEI) PARE:\§'f§"§#:?s4191.32
`
`E31 1856?’?
`
`O€=f1?;'20{}S
`
`Mark: TOYS THAT ENSPEPLE THE
`
`IMAGENATIQN §#:§{'_§{§_,7f_I§_3_;_§_
`
`§13..6L’§502
`
`{B5;’£‘8,12fiO5
`
`Nomi Lgarning-__§_:;_g*_nmxanitiesx Inc.
`Mark: INSPIRATIEEN .
`.
`. MOYIVATEON K
`EDUCATION §#:7839?°3<‘.3r’-E»
`
`.
`
`,
`
`Ifl5Q§i'{:iE§0!“‘: S§;__f_£;warefl Inc.
`
`Irasgiration Seftvsfgare inc;
`
`Ensggiratiun Saftware‘ _§_{_’z__a_;._m
`
`
`Ensggiration S-_3§_ftwar'e
`inc
`Mark: INSPERATICIN S#:?41-31 1386:
`R#:_;},_864i1?'
`
`yjggpiratien Softw;_a;_:_*_§, Inc,
`
`
`£nsgir§;_‘_c_i_§n Sioftware Ig3_§_,w
`Mark: INSPERATIGN S#:?43113QEe
`R#‘:185413.?
`
`
`INSPIRATEQN $53) FTWARE INC.
`Mm-5:: ENSPIRATEON $#:;z_«_4;.__3___3:16sa
`R#:_1__Z_§§51.4
`
`Insggiraticm Softwan=:,__;{_z3_g_.m
`
`Ins iratéon Seftwara inc.
`
`?age #1. £323 is page: ‘E
`
`_.'_P, 3 4 Next
`
`Resuils as as‘ DQIETEZDDT 01:53 PM
`
`Search agaén
`
`E JEGME § ENQEEXE SEARQH E eSUSii\iE$S E CONTACT US i PREVACY STATEMENT
`
`9f27a’2€3U’£’ 1:53 PM
`
`
`
`U531-“TD "£‘TA‘£§‘v’UE. Trademark Triai and Appeal Beard Inquiry”.
`
`ht£p:!ft&ahvue.uspt0.gc: v_fitab'vue;’v?;:-u= .-’é.f22ir3spiratio§¥§HiQEi¥A‘
`
` United States Patent and Trademark Gffice
`
`Home § Site Index §Searci*3 f isfuidees § Contacts E eaiiusineess E efiir aiertsi News E5-ieip
`
`
`
`TTABVUE. Trademark Triai and Appeai Beard inquiry System
`
`Summary
`
`Query: Party Name contains aii wordgz “Ei\£SPERAT'£=f.'3N SOFTWARE"
`Number of resuirsz 9?’
`
`Rasuirs are in reverse crrmriniagicai order
`
`Fage #2. Go tr: page: _Previous 1
`
`_:f:_ 55 Next
`
`Prcaceaading irefenriamtis),
`Fiiirsg {Liam Prrsperryiierfi
`91155538
`
`06;’ 1{),:’2OOS
`
`"E"ai'g<a~i: Brands: Inc.
`Mark: READ. BE INSPIRED. WRITE BACK
`$#:f/$335268
`
`378419132
`
`GEI31/ZEFDS
`
`
`§_r_1§piregi Life Miraiswieaa ‘inc.
`Mai-in INSPIRED raarrxrrs sr::?s41_g;g._§2:
`
`Piainrirfis},
`Pretepertyfiaas)
`
`Insggiratig_a__§oftware, Inc.
`
`Ensgiration Softwargi EH12‘
`
`INSPi'RATI€Ji\_i___§0FTWARE
`INC,
`Mark: INSPIRATION §#:?4311685
`R#:1?68514
`
`Erssairarimi So_if3;y_q_r-are, inc.
`
`
`§_g‘}_§pirat§cm Software ___§_i_@§_.__
`
`Insgiraticm Seftwarei IE‘_‘i_§i__:__
`
`;nsgir'a'i:ion Software, Eric.
`
`764372318
`
`{)3;’(}2;’2UOS
`
`783{3§3éi-33
`
`03/‘01f2{)05
`
`7783352638
`
`G3jfl1;’2i3i35
`
`?8397364
`
`03,10 1j2€)Q5
`
`9 1 1 64083
`
`01,:"25;'2Gi3S
`
`911§':1£’+3?4_
`{)1f2Sf2E§{3S
`
`9 1 1 64064
`
`iI31,«".'25fI2E)O5
`
`2_§_L_3_§_1892
`.1 if 313;’ 2004
`
`783SS820
`
`11;’30f20Q4
`
`§j_.__1__63Q28
`1 IKGSIEQQ4
`
`Mark: TQYS THAT ENSPIRE THE
`IMRGINATIQN §#375“3-72318
`
`Ins§girasis.=sa1__i,_i__r_r_;_ii:e:;i
`Maria: INSPIRASIAN s#:733oes433
`
`Target Branci$,___E__r_i_§.“_
`Mark: READ. BEE INSPERED. WRITE BACK
`§#:?8335268
`
`
`Ncabei Learning Cr2mm_g_gi_i_i:ies Eric.
`Mark: INSPIRATION .
`.
`. MOTIVATION .
`EEBUCATION 3-'#:?839}’364
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Teaaiier Insgirad Pr.3ci:ic:ai___§_ta.ii*fi Inc.
`Mark: T.LF‘.S. — TEACHER ENEPIRED
`PRACTECAL STUFF S#:?6S-‘@1636
`
`1_E§_§PIRATiON sorrxamas, INC.
`Mark: INSPERATEQN $$r:2_gi§_J;.__;686
`R#:1?'68S14
`
`ginsgireci euaarriing Tina
`Mark: INSPIRED ELEARNING EBEJCATEQN
`FDR YGUR ENTEEWRISE S-#:?'825‘E35GS
`
`-.-.—.._:—............-4l...............
`INSPIRATLQEELSOFTWARE INC.
`Mark: ENSPERATIQN $#:?4311fS85
`R-#:1?68S14
`
`Mark: PARENTS INSPIRATKON INSTITUTE
`5%?’-“:?6553§15
`
`
`Srsimeider Gar};
`Mark: INSPIRE 5#:78351.EE92
`
`Caesars Enggggrainment, Eric.
`Mark: BE ENSPIRED S#:_Z§_;_3__6582D
`
`FAVERGE Maumg S.
`Maria: INSPERIZED §#°:_Z_&}_;___;i_;8?3
`
`Inspiration Srzftwagjgi Inc.
`
`
`Insg_i_r__2_.a_tiv:>n Software Eric.
`
`1_i_\_iTRAiAi‘viER3:CA EiE_;g_U‘i"‘:’ NEWQRK INC
`
`Irisgiration Software __§_r_1_c“:;_
`
`
`insgirggign Software Inc.
`Mark: ENSPERATION 5#:74311€Eg§_Q
`R#:1?68514
`
`9.*'Ei7,"2Gi}? 1:53 FM
`
`
`
`J:«1*'JI;<,Z= £":',/-:.tW
`
`:i'racien":a:‘k Trial and Appeal Board Enquiry...
`
`http :£!itaE>vue.u5pto. gmr,fttaabv1teiv? pn==‘?‘;Z2im-pita
`
`?r:::ceedi:°:g Qefandantis),
`Fiiing Date Wapertyiies}
`?82S°35§3S
`
`13,/EOQGE34
`
`Ins§ire§§___eLear.ning Inc
`Mark: INSPIREQ ELEARNING EDUCATIQN
`FOR YQUR ENTERPRISE S#:?‘82S9SC35
`
`
`
`10,«"20i20Ci4
`
`Mark: PRRENTS INSPIRATIQN INSTETUTE
`S#‘:7=S>;'*3S3:’315
`
`Piaintiffis},
`Pmpartyiies}
`
`InsQiratior_a___§g;3ftwas'e
`Inc.___
`
`1NSPI_F__§EQ{ION SOE1f3§._ij§RE WC.
`Mark: INSPIRATION S#:74311:385
`R#:1?‘68S1<:
`
`Insggiragipn Softwarg1__j£_m:.
`
`Insgiratéongnftware, In<;_.___
`EN:-,?§3‘IF_i_g§‘3__"s_“_1._§;\J SC}:-'-':”}»_.1j»_,{;§‘5_E{u_!’:‘! INC.
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN S#:?%’431.:.686
`R#:17€>8514
`
`
`EnsQEra3g_t_i_g_§: Scaftware __§j_1_§__.__
`
`}’§354163{}
`
`1{3f2€3f2{){)4
`
`?{:35353'}'5
`
`l§3;’3Z{3;'20€I}<§
`
`91 1,§:3}.?G€3
`
`E}E§!E39,f2G£§4
`
`Mark: T.I.F-KS. — TEACHER INSPIRED
`PRACTISAL STUFF S#:?‘PSS4163{3
`
`_.3§j§3_§_'j_§:___.Xi Deita Fraternit
`Mark: INSPIRING WQMEN TC} REALEZE
`THEIR PCBTENTIAL §#:?’5§353‘,?5
`
`§U§d€QOS_§f_§_, a Church C()i"g€:ti‘_$_.=;:_§:_§_(:‘3__£:1__
`E N 3PI RATI_Q__N___§_Q FT\rVA§3_.f;‘_£___§_I_\_J_
`Mark: DAILY GUIEIJEPOSTS YOUR SGURCE Mark: ENSPERATIGN $#:?'fi-311686
`OF INSPERATION §#‘:?-é51fl27’}°
`R$:_3_._?_§8SI,€‘s-
`
`3781 128373
`
`G8;'{}S,"2G{}4
`
`FAVERO Maura, 5.
`Mark: INSPIRIZED S#:78i128?3
`
`Insgiration Seaftwarghinc.
`Mark: INSPIRATIGN S#:'?4311E_1_§i§
`R#:1?E'>851«:
`
`§;;§Q§§§
`asm3,:‘2m:4
`
`Weekiy ¥~‘«:eader Cmrg.
`Insgiratiam Ssftware. }§‘)__§_:__
`Mark: INSPIRE THE FUTLJRE S#:?821_§§§§_ Mark: INSE3IRf\‘§'ION §#:743116§§
`R#:l}’6B51-“~§~
`
`?:‘:32334{3§S
`
`OSi1?f20{F=i§
`
`gytggrmax. Inc.
`Mark: ENSPERE 5#:?f32334Q§_
`
`?'651G2?'}’
`
`€}5,»'10,f2G04
`
`5: Church {.‘.=;:rgora::i<3n_
`€5ui<j_§;_;;gg;sts:
`Mark: DAILY GUEDEPQSTS YCPLJRESQURCE
`OF INSPIRAHQN S#:?651(_}_§_£__Z_"{‘_
`
`§1;§Q§§§
`04;23;20@4
`
`Edwards Lifeggigncs Cargoratian
`Mark: INSPIRATIQN FROM LIFE FOR LEFE
`S#:?'823§£)18
`
`I3sC8F“_§§'_:CGE‘QC3$”E3ted
`Mark: ASPIRE $#:?4?2_§{:_Q_2;§3_ R#:.?;12-'§__7__§Z3__;3;
`Acer I:':-:;. am .*'3‘\tZ€£"£3_f_”]j‘5_t§§[}CE3 Cc>rg;o:j_.:g_§j_g([}_
`Ensgérzaigfian SGft\.'\.i_£_5__.?_’_g=;__,_ Inc,
`
`£E§§EB£EE§EL§§fl?1MARE l§§;
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN §#°:;'{_z_1__3 71.1686
`R#:1?‘68S3.t:~
`
`inagiratierz Software Inc,
`
`§;;§Q;Q§
`e3;29;20a4
`
`78215859
`
`u3;05;2aa4
`
`911SS§417
`
`C}2,r'£§2;’2€3E34
`
`The Mas‘aueriL;e____E*§tersen Foundatiazan
`Mark: ENSPERATIGN PO1NTS#:?fi438186
`
`§NSP’T.RAT'£0i\£ SQFTW;\RE: INC.
`
`Weekifg Reacggg Csarg,
`Errsggiratiun Software! Inc.
`Mark: ENSFIRE THE FUTURE S#:?82158S‘3 Mark: ENSPIRATION S#:_E<$311536
`R#ilZ§§§$§
`
`Insggired Leag Can;-:uPtir§g3___1nc.
`Mark: INSPIRED LEAP S#:?’8;?;12?§4
`
`INSPIRATIQN SQFT§§{_.4_’3\RE{ INC
`
`Page #32. $0 to page: Previous 1
`
`_§3__§ Next
`
`Resuiis as of 99131239? 01:53 PM
`
`Search again
`
`3
`
`.HC3:°:‘sE 3
`
`!NDE3(§ SEARCH E eBLiS3NE3S E CQNTACZT US E PREVACY STAYEMENT
`
`9:’2'.7'f?.{3€}?' 1:53 PM
`
`
`
`~.~'-.1.-L 4 x.,.-
`
`_s ;; an a Let...
`
`.x:u\..\\...unca;uL\
`
`x ;1u1 (ihlki 1’)?-'E.)'i'.(.L1 uuuau 1.1 Lk..1!..ill.l}Im.
`
`: n.L!.;.;,v z.m:.w u<:.L.m}2Lu.5u vi um.;v w::,- v :54-1;- .IOL.£_1llb}Ji1vz1i.lUE§?h‘ibfi.t3A
`
` Unifieti Stams Patent and Trademark {Bffice
`
`Rome Efiite inciexmearch§-Eiuidsas:ittuntactsiafiusinessfiefiiz aieertsmewsifieip
`
`
`
`TTASVUE. Trademark Trfiai and Appaai Beard inquiry System
`
`Summary
`
`Query: ?‘arty Name cemtains aii words: “INSP1RA”E'IQN SOF‘fWARE"
`Numher szwf resssitss 97
`
`Resuits are in reverse chranaiagicai cmfier
`
`Page #3. $9 in gage: _¥3;j§_vious _; 3: 33
`
`5%; Next
`
`Pmcaefiing Defenfiaantfis),
`Fifiéng flats Pmpertyiiag}
`
`"EESSEGBS4
`
`Ffiafintiffls},
`Frcspertyiies)
`
`
`Ii’\3S§*1RATIQN___S;_§;)F"§"WARE INC
`
`
`
`INSPIRATIQN SOFTWARE INC
`
`Enaggiratien $_g_ff;_ware, Inc.
`
`§_§_ .__§_§§¢
`INSEDIRATION S€)F‘Ei_.:_3{_.§§R.E ENC.
`
`EN;‘SF‘IRA"E"I{)N S:2(}FTW§§_§_-“_{__E. ENC.
`
`gggggiration Saftware. Inc
`
`INSPIRATEDN Si)?’-"i"\?\f_g?g_§R_._§, INC
`
`ENSPIRATION S(I§E""TW;§§_3§§, ENC.
`Mark: INSPIRATIGN $#:?4311586
`R#:17'5§§_1_f_«’zr__
`INSPERRTEON SQFTWARE INC.
`Mark: ENSPIRATIQN S#:_?4-311585
`R#:1?58514
`
`Insgiration Sfiftwarag Inc
`
`Ensgiratism Soft»xr§;_s;§.__Inc
`Mark: ENSPIRATTQN S#:‘?431168é:“s
`R-3$’:__1___3_"__é_33j8S 14
`
`Ii\‘__€.:_,__
`§__E§§_¥_’__E_§_§£3sTE{I3N SSE-'-'TW'ARE,
`Mark: ENSPIRATEGN $#‘:_f§_311586
`R#:1?f58S14
`
`ENSPIRATION s_g_g§j{v\:.:-aka. ENC.
`Mark: INsmR.<m:::>N s#:?'4311§~.§§
`R#:1.’?68;‘514
`
`Insgyratirm Sofi;ware,_§_r_3g;,___
`
`G1f23f2C3Q-4
`78153192
`
`C*1f23f2{}G4
`
`178239318
`
`C3l,¢’22/'2i}Ei4
`
`Z§_$_3_§;__8;.§
`12,:22;‘2:::{>3
`
`91 1589534
`
`12;'19,v’20Q3
`91 158E345
`
`l2_;'i5,f2{){B3
`?8212?94
`
`1 150312033
`
`Edwards Life-szziencs C~:>rgQrat_i_g;s__r_L
`Mark; INSPERATIELIN FROM LEFE FOR LIFE
`S#:?823’£§€318
`
`The Marguerite Petersen Faundation
`Mark: INSPIRATEQN POENT S#:3'__§_{§_;3_§__‘__1_§§§
`Inzfiaoks inc.
`Mark: INSPERATIQN CENTER S#:}’5~’§»68188
`
`Scott Lari Jiii
`
`Mark: KIUSFIRQTIONAL S#:?62980-44
`
`Insgired Leag Cemsuiting Em;
`Mark: INSPERED LEAF-‘ S#:1E$__3§_‘_;i__2_?,_§{_i-}_{§_
`
`:”L1__1__5_8...1...4...0..
`1 :3; 1 352003
`
`Whirigooi Pre3gemes: In_c__,__
`Mark: INSPERIENCE S#:?‘816394?
`
`91138146
`
`1£§!{}8,r’2E){33
`
`91 1 58892
`
`1€}f(3fif?.{3fi3
`
`91 158093
`
`1()[G5,i'2{3€33
`
`91158119
`
`1Gf€.36;’2EP(}3
`
`91158145
`
`1G,f£)6j2OG3
`
`Mark: SPEREMEEBIA $#:2__‘;§§_G8 140
`
`Leszynski G:“_§3_g;_{_3_,___.Em:.
`Mark: Ei\i5PIRE S#:?81?6358
`
`Mitten Gr‘oug:. Inc. The
`Mark: ASPERE. INSPIRE. §‘=#:_}f=534iZ348(}1
`
`Mark: INSPIRE INTERNATIONAL ENC.
`S#:76441lf.P8
`
`Ensgiriragg SQ§U§_§__§§_fJ_§: inc.
`Mark: INSPIRENKE SOLUTIONS
`§#:?’t'i3B49=9‘e~£§
`
`_‘_3__11S8G'}“‘3
`{39f29;’20fi3
`
`Rog, Dabra E.
`Mark: ENSPIRINGS S-#:?‘54S85?S
`
`~"..3
`
`3*.)
`
`9;’27:’20{)?' 1:53 PM
`
`
`
`L155!at) ’§'{’Ai;W U 2:1. ‘.E’radema rk Trizai and Appeai Board in-1:;a,1ir_;r..;
`
`httpzfftta1'wL::3.Lzs pfxt:-.gavfttabvuefv? ;3z\=‘}'322inspirati¢EK'£'Eb_l:E§9s
`
`Qrmzeefiing D&far:dant{§),.
`Fifiing Ersata Prnperwfiiesg
`
`Pfiaintiffifi,
`Property{Ees}
`
`In2Boc:ksg Inc.
`?..1“i.-‘E.3£&§
`{)9/29,:’2E3£}3 Mark: INS¥3'IRATIC)N CENTER S#’:?6468.‘L84
`
`Sc-cat: L0rE Jiii
`
`3’629804-4
`
`Enggiraticm Softvjgggreg Inc. §Insg3ir‘atic::j_a_‘}___
`
`
`_E_g_§Q_i_gjation Saftware Inc
`
`09,"22;’2{}03
`
`‘}'54€38188
`
`fl’3é,:’i5!2C3€L'3
`
`91 15781 3
`
`DE-3‘,/i3Bf2C303
`
`911.S?'?'69
`
`GQXEPBXEQOE
`
`76418523
`
`Mark: KEDSPIRATIQNAL S#:?‘6