throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA114826
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`12/15/2006
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Entity
`Address
`
`Stussy, Inc.
`Corporation
`17426 Daimler Street
`Irvine, CA 92614
`UNITED STATES
`
`Citizenship
`
`California
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`John R. Sommer
`John R. Sommer, Attorney-at-Law
`17426 Daimler Street
`Irvine, CA 92614
`UNITED STATES
`sommer@stussy.com Phone:949 752 5344
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`International
`Registration No.
`Applicant
`
`76242441
`12/15/2006
`
`NONE
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`International
`Registration Date
`
`11/28/2006
`12/28/2006
`
`NONE
`
`SHIN, KYU HO
`164-9, Samjeon-dong
`Songpa-ku, Seoul,
`KOREA, REPUBLIC OF
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 018.
`All goods and sevices in the class are opposed, namely: leather goods, trunks, bags and umbrellas,
`namely, portable cosmetic cases not filled with any contents; fur skin, namely, fur pelts; artificial fur
`skin, namely imitation fur pelts, non-precious materials purses, student's bags in the nature of
`backpacks, beach parasols, parasols, sticks for mountain-climbing, leather straps, namely, hand and
`shoulder carrying straps
`Class 025.
`All goods and sevices in the class are opposed, namely: clothing, shoes and hats, namely, low
`shoes, sports anorak, horse riding pants, men's suits, jeogori, namely Korean jackets, sweater, hats,
`leather belts
`
`Attachments
`
`Opposition.PDF ( 6 pages )(241863 bytes )
`
`Signature
`Name
`
`/John R. Sommer/
`John R. Sommer
`
`

`
`Date
`
`12/15/2006
`12/15/zoos
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`1n the matter of Application Serial No. 76/242,441
`Published for Opposition in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE of November 28, 2006
`
`STUSSY, lNC.,
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`KYU HO SHIN,
`Applicant.
`
`:
`:
`
`Opposition No.:
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Stussy, Inc. (“Opposer”), a California corporation having its principal place of business at
`
`17426 Daimler Street, Irvine, California 92614, believes it will be damaged by registration of the
`
`device mark SS shown in Serial No. 76/242,441 in International Class 18 and 25, filed by Kyu
`
`Ho Shin (“Applicant”), and hereby opposes the same.
`
`As grounds for this Opposition, it is alleged:
`
`1.
`
`On or about April 18, 2001, Applicant filed an intent to use application with the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the SS device mark (consisting of two
`
`back—to—bacl< letter “S”s)(hereinafter “Applicant’s Mark”) for “leather goods, trunks, bags and
`
`umbrellas, namely, portable cosmetic cases not filled with any contents; fur skin, namely, fur
`
`pelts; artificial fur skin, namely imitation fur pelts, non—precious materials purses, student's bags
`
`in the nature of backpacks, beach parasols, parasols, sticks for rnountain—clirr1bing, leather straps,
`
`namely, hand and shoulder carrying straps” in International Class 18 and for “clothing, shoes and
`
`hats, namely, low shoes, sports anorak, horse riding pants, men's suits, jeogori, namely Korean
`
`jackets, sweater, hats, leather belts” in International Class 25.
`
`

`
`2.
`
`Previously Applicant filed its Application Serial Number 76/2425 56 for “covers
`
`of textile for furniture and household items, namely, covers for laundry machines, curtains of
`
`textile or plastic (except for shower curtains), television covers, piano covers, quilts, mattress
`
`covers, covers, bed blankets, bed covers, cushion covers; handkerchiefs of textile, towels of
`
`textile; silk fabric, cotton fabric, woolen cloth, artificial sweat fabric, embroidery fabric,
`
`synthetic fiber fabric, mixed hempen fabric, chemical fiber union cloth” in International Class
`
`24; and for “Shoe accessories, namely, shoe hooks, shoe buckles, shoe ornaments (not of
`
`precious metal), laces (except for embroidered laces); hair ribbons, hair pins, barrettes; belt
`
`ornaments, namely, pins, spangles; buckles and brooches for clothing; ornamental ribbons, hair
`
`grips and hair bands; buttons, hooks and snaps for clothing” in International Class 26. Opposer
`
`filed an Opposition against such Application and such Application was abandoned thereafter.
`
`2.
`
`Since at least as early as October 18, 1989, Opposer has been using the SS Link
`
`Mark (consisting of two back—to—back and interlocking letter “S”s) (hereinafter “SS Link Mark”)
`
`on a variety of goods and services as listed on the registrations listed below, among others goods
`
`and services:
`
`Class
`
`Reg. No.
`
`Reg. Date
`
`Goods
`
`artial list
`
`06
`09
`14
`16
`18
`19
`20
`22
`24
`25
`26
`28
`
`2,426,975
`2,399,916
`2,515,116
`2,450,863
`2,343,524
`California 105461
`2,444,295
`California 105 994
`2,590,655
`2,225,736
`2,450,864
`2,426,974
`
`02/06/01
`10/31/00
`12/04/01
`05/ 15/01
`04/18/00
`08/27/99
`04/17/01
`02/02/00
`07/09/02
`02/23/99
`05/15/01
`02/06/01
`
`Metal products
`Sunglasses, CDs
`Jewelry
`Printed matter, stickers, etc.
`Bags, luggage, etc.
`Foam and plastic signs
`Signs
`Bags for storage
`Labels
`Clothing, headwear
`Belt buckles
`Toys
`
`

`
`3.
`
`Specifically, Opposer is the owner of U.S. Registration No. 2,176,426 in
`
`International Class 18 and Reg. No. 2,225,736 in International Class 25, both for the SS Link
`
`Device. Both Registrations are incontestable within the meaning of Section 15.
`
`4.
`
`There is no issue as to priority. Applicant’s priority date for his intent—to—use
`
`application is the filing date, April 18, 2001. Opposer’s priority dates for the registrations are:
`
`Class 18:
`
`first use: September 1, 1992 and filed June 16, 1999; Class 25: first use January 1,
`
`1992 and filed January 6, 1998. Since long prior to Applicant’s filing of the application for
`
`Applicant’s Mark (no use of Applicant’s Mark having been alleged by Applicant), Opposer has
`
`made substantial and continuous use of the SS Link Mark in interstate, foreign, and intrastate
`
`comrnerce on and in connection with the advertising, promotion, and sale of its goods, since as
`
`early as 1992.
`
`5.
`
`By virtue of the aforesaid advertising, promotion, and sales, and by virtue of the
`
`excellence of its products, Opposer’s SS Link Mark has come to represent exceedingly valuable
`
`goodwill owned by Opposer.
`
`6.
`
`The goods on which Opposer uses its SS Link Mark and the goods for which
`
`Applicant seeks to register Applicant’s Mark are closely related, if not identical, and are sold
`
`through the same channels of trade and to the same class of purchasers.
`
`7.
`
`Opposer’s SS Link Mark and Applicant’s Mark are confusingly and substantially
`
`Similar.
`
`8.
`
`Use by Applicant of Applicant’s Mark will be likely to cause confusion, mistake,
`
`or deception with Opposer’s SS Link Mark, and result in the belief that Applicant or Applicant’s
`
`goods are in some way legitimately connected with, sponsored by, or approved by Opposer,
`
`

`
`resulting in damage and injury to Opposer. Persons familiar with Opposer’s SS Link Mark
`
`would be likely to buy Applicant’s goods as and for a product made a11d sold by Opposer. Any
`
`such confusion in trade inevitably would result in loss of sales to Opposer. Furthermore, any
`
`defect, objection, or fault found with Applicant’s products marketed under Applicant’s Mark
`
`would necessarily reflect upon and seriously injure the reputation that Opposer has established
`
`for its products merchandised under Opposer’s SS Link Mark.
`
`9.
`
`Any use Applicant has made or may make of Applicant’s Mark, is and will be
`
`without Opposer°s consent or permission.
`
`10.
`
`Applicant has no good faith intention to use Applicant’s Mark. Instead, Applicant
`
`filed and continues to prosecute this trademark application in bad faith, as is clear from the letter
`
`that Applicant wrote to Opposer on about May 9, 2002. Applicant sent the letter to Opposer,
`
`(before Opposer even contacted Applicant). In Applicant’s letter, Applicant proposes that “you
`
`[Opposer] and me together make a world first famous fashion masterpiece by grafting well the
`
`[Applicant’s Mark] developed by me and the [Opposer’s SS Link Mark] developed by your
`
`company.” It is clear from App1icant’s letter that:
`
`a.
`
`Applicant knew of Opposer’s SS Link Mark prior to Applicant contacting
`
`Opposer;
`
`b.
`
`Applicant knew that Opposer’s SS Link Mark and Applicant’s Mark were, at
`
`least, confusingly similar. (Otherwise, why would Applicant contact Opposer?)
`
`c.
`
`Applicant is an unknown person (“anonymity like me”), but he demanded that
`
`Opposer give him a job: “If I and your company together make a merger
`
`

`
`company, I am confident to grow it without fail but into fashion company
`
`competent to raise sale record over one billion dollars per year with three or five
`
`years.” If not, he was “prepared to leave the company without lingering at any
`
`job position or title in that company.” In other words, Applicant wanted a job and
`
`a salary from Opposer because Applicant had filed for a trademark (Applicant’s
`
`Mark) that is a close copy of Opposer’s SS Link Mark.
`
`1 1.
`
`On August 6, 2002, Applicant sent a further letter to Opposer.
`
`In such letter,
`
`Applicant proposes the creation of a company that includes Opposer’s trademarks.
`
`In exchange
`
`for Applicant’s contribution of his applications and registrations for App1icant’s Mark, Applicant
`
`proposes to take a twenty—five percent (25%) share in the company. This is extortion. Opposer
`
`is a long existing, internationally famous, and successful company that has sold about US$500
`
`million worth of products over the last twenty (20) years under the STUSSY mark and/or SS
`
`Link Mark. Applicant has no company and no business. Applicant has merely filed for
`
`variations on Opposer’s famous SS Link Mark and now Applicant wants twenty—five percent
`
`(25%) of Opposer.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant has no good faith intention to make trademark use of Applicant’s Mark
`
`on each or any of the goods listed in the notice of publication for Applicant’s Mark.
`
`

`
`WHEREFORE, registration by Applicant of the aforesaid Applicant’s Mark for the
`
`aforesaid goods will be damaging to Opposer, and Opposer therefore requests that the
`
`Opposition be sustained.
`
`John R. Sommer
`
`17426 Daimler Street
`
`Irvine, California 92614
`
`(949) 752-5344
`Fax: (949) 752-5439
`SOMMER@STUSSY.COM
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Stussy, Inc.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket