throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA88359
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`07/05/2006
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous
`extension
`Address
`
`Leo Pharma A/S
`07/05/2006
`
`Industriparken 55
`Ballerup, DK-2750
`DENMARK
`
`Domestic
`Representative
`
`Roger W. Herrell
`Attorney for Opposer
`Dann, Dorfman, Herrell and Skillman
`1601 Market Street Suite 2400
`Philadelphia, PA 19103-2307
`UNITED STATES
`docketclerk@ddhs.com, rherrell@ddhs.com Phone:215-563-4100
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`76636322
`07/05/2006
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`
`03/07/2006
`07/05/2006
`
`Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`122 East 42nd Street, Suite 2606
`New York, NY 10168
`UNITED STATES
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 042. First Use: 2003/03/19 First Use In Commerce: 2003/03/19
`All goods and sevices in the class are opposed, namely: Research and development of
`pharmaceutical products
`
`Attachments
`
`Notice of Opposition.pdf ( 6 pages )(138890 bytes )
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/rwh/
`Roger W. Herrell
`07/05/2006
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Leo Pharma A/S
`
`: Opposition No.
`
`: :
`
`Appl. No. 76/636,322 (ITU)
`: "LEV PHARMA”
`
`: Published in 0G
`
`: March 7, 2006
`
`Opposer
`
`v.
`
`Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`
`Applicant
`
`CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`
`E hereby certify that this correspondence is being electronically filed with
`the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals at the United States Patent
`and Trademark Office.
`
` July 5, 2006
`
`Date
`
`Christine Edinger
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Leo Pharma A/S, a Denmark Joint Stock Company, having a place of
`
`business at lndustriparken 55, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark (hereinafter “Opposer” or
`
`“LEO"), believes that it will be damaged by Application Serial No. 76/636,322, filed April
`
`18, 2005, seeking registration on the Principal Register of the mark “LEV PHARMA” by
`
`Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (hereinafter “Applicant”) for the services of research and
`
`development of pharmaceutical products, and published for opposition in the March 7,
`
`2006, Official Gazette, and Opposer hereby opposes the registration of the “LEV
`
`PHARMA" trademark under Section 13 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1063.
`
`

`
`The grounds for opposition, on information and belief, are as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Applicant, Lev Pharmaceuticals, lnc., seeks to register the mark
`
`"LEV PHARMA” for "research and development of pharmaceutical products” in
`
`International Class 042, as evidenced by the publication of said mark in the Official
`
`Gazette of March 7, 2006.
`
`2.
`
`LEO is the owner of the registered trademark “LEO”, U.S.
`
`Trademark Registration No. 1,777,615, registered June 22, 1993. The goods identified
`
`in the registration are pharmaceutical preparations; namely, antibiotic, antibacterial,
`diuretic, antihypertensive, vitamin, mineral supplement, hormone, anti—inf|ammatory,
`
`analgesic, anticoagulant, anesthetic, and cytostatic agent preparations.
`
`3.
`
`LED is also the owner of the registered trademark “LEO and
`
`Design", U.S. Trademark Registration No. 1,782,361, registered July 20, 1993. The
`
`goods identified in the registration are pharmaceutical preparations; namely, antibiotic,
`
`antibacterial, diuretic, antihypertensive, vitamin, mineral supplement, hormone, anti-
`
`inflammatory, analgesic, anticoagulant, anesthetic, and cytostatic agent preparations.
`
`4.
`
`LEO is a Danish pharmaceutical company which manufactures and
`
`sells a wide range of pharmaceutical products in world market, including the United
`
`States.
`
`In addition, LEO has various license agreements with pharmaceutical
`
`companies in the United States to market LEO’s pharmaceuticai products.
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, Applicant has not used the trademark
`
`"LEV PHARMA” in connection with research and development of pharmaceutical
`
`products prior to March 19, 2003, which is the date of first use alleged in App|icant’s
`
`application, Serial No. 76/636,322.
`
`

`
`6.
`
`Since a date long before the filing of Applicant's Application, Serial
`
`No. 76/636,322, Opposer has used the trade names LE0, LE0 PHARMA and LEO
`
`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS LTD. A/S, in connection with the marketing of
`
`pharmaceutical products in the United States and internationally, and such use is
`
`currently ongoing.
`
`7.
`
`The use of the names LE0, LE0 PHARMA and LEO
`
`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS LTD. A/S by Opposer in connection with marketing
`
`of pharmaceutical products has been valid and continuous since a date well in advance
`
`of Applicant's first use date and such use by Opposer has not been abandoned.
`
`8.
`
`The trade names LE0, LE0 PHARMA and LEO
`
`PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS Ltd. A/S are symbolic of extensive goodwill and
`
`recognition generated through substantial effort in use and promotion of these trade
`
`HEIITIGS.
`
`9.
`
`Opposer's registered trademark "LEO and Design" was granted on
`
`Application Serial No. 74/228,851, filed December 6, 1991, with a claim of priority under
`
`15 U.S.C. 1126 (Lanham Act §44) based on Danish Registration No. VR02.350985,
`
`dated August 2, 1985.
`
`10.
`
`Opposer's registered trademark "LEO and Design" was granted on
`
`Application Serial No. 74/228,850, filed December 6, 1991, with a claim of priority under
`
`15 U.S.C. 1126 (Lanham Act §44) based on Danish Registration No. 2615-1984, dated
`
`July 20, 1984.
`
`11.
`
`Opposer has used its registered trademarks "LEO“ and "LEO and
`
`Design" and is stiil using said marks in connection with the marketing of pharmaceutical
`
`products and said use has not been abandoned.
`
`

`
`12.
`
`Opposer's registered trademarks "LEO" and "LEO and Design" are
`
`symbolic of goodwill and recognition built up by Opposer based on considerable time
`
`and effort in use and promotion of those marks.
`
`13.
`
`The trademark "LEV PHARMA” sought to be registered by
`
`Applicant, closely resembles one or more of LEO’s trademarks and trade names “LEO”,
`
`“LEO PHAFIMA” and “LEO PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS LTD. A/S” and when
`
`applied to Applicant's activities, is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and/or deception,
`
`as proscribed by Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), resulting in
`
`damage and injury to Opposer, Opposer’s reputation and goodwill and its valuable
`
`trade names, trademarks and business.
`
`14.
`
`Applicants adoption of the designation "LEV PHARMA" as a
`
`trademark is without license or permission of LEO and is likely to deceive persons by
`
`creating the erroneous impression that Applicant's services are related to Opposer and
`
`Opposer‘s goods or are connected in some way with Opposer or Opposer's goods, or
`
`are the same as Opposer's goods, and registration of Applicant's mark increases the
`
`likelihood of confusion between Opposer, Opposer's goods and Applicant's goods and
`
`services to the detriment of Opposer and the public, and any faults or imperfections in
`
`Applicant's services and goods marketed in association with the “LEV PHARMA” mark
`
`sought to be registered, will reflect adversely on Opposer and Opposer's goodwill and
`
`reputation and may disparage Opposer's goods unless this Opposition is sustained.
`
`15.
`
`Applicant's mark, by reason of its similarity to Opposer's marks and
`
`trade names, will enable Applicant to gain a foothold in Opposer's market, by exploiting
`
`subliminal or subconscious association with Opposer and Opposer's well known marks
`
`and trade names.
`
`

`
`16.
`
`In view of the similarity of Applicant’s service mark “LEV PHARMA”
`
`and LEO’s trademarks and trade names “LEO”, “LEO PHARMA" and “LEO
`
`HAFIMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS LTD. A/S”, the related nature of the goods and
`
`services of the respective parties, and the similar manner of marketing the same type
`
`goods and services, the mark “LEV PHARMA”, which Applicant seeks to register, is
`
`confusingly similar to LEO’s prior-used trademarks and trade names and prior-
`
`registered trademarks and is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake or to
`
`deceive actual and/or potential purchasers, resulting in damage to Opposer, Opposer's
`
`reputation and goodwill in its trademarks and trade names.
`
`17.
`
`In view of the above allegations, Opposer is likely to be damaged
`
`by registration of Applicant's mark in that the prima facie effect of such registration will
`
`be in derogation of Opposer's rights in its trademarks and trade names.
`
`WHEREFORE, LEO respectfully requests that Application Serial No.
`
`76/636,322 be rejected, that no registration be issued thereon to Applicant and that this
`
`Opposition be sustained in favor of LE0.
`
`LE0 submits herewith the requisite filing fee of $300.00.
`
`in the event that
`
`a payment is missing or the check is improper in any respect, or the fee calculation is in
`
`error, the Assistant Commissioner is authorized to charge any underpayment or credit
`
`any overpayment to the deposit account of the undersigned attorneys, Deposit Account
`
`No. 04-1406.
`
`A duplicate copy of this Notice of Opposition is enciosed herewith.
`
`

`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL AND SKILLMAN, P.C.
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`7; :5 075
`DA E
`
`
`
`TO #22,964)
`E L ESQ.
`R0 ER
`STEPHEN H. ELAND, ESQ., (PTO #41,010
`1601 Market Street, Suite 2400
`Philadelphia, PA 19103-2307
`Telephone: 215.563.4100
`Facsimile: 215.563.4044

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket