throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TIUXDEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of Application Serial No. 76/103,455
`Filed on August 7, 2000
`For the Mark REACH THE CHILDREN
`
`Published in the Oflicial Gazette (Trademarks) on April 1, 2003
`
`REACH THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION, INC.,
`A Florida Non-Profit Corporation,
`
`°8'14'2°°3
`u.s. mom a. TMO1cITM Mall Ham 0'» 4“
`
`_VS..
`
`Opposer,
`
`Opposition No. 91156603
`
`REACH THE CHILDREN, lNC.,
`a New York Corporation,
`
`Applicant.
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`In response to the Notice of Opposition issued by the Board on June 12, 2003 (the
`
`“Notice”), the Applicant, Reach the Children, Inc., a New York not-for-profit corporation,
`
`answers the Notice as follows:
`
`1.
`
`In response to the allegations of paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Notice, the
`
`Applicant denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of such
`
`allegations.
`
`2.
`
`In response to the allegations of paragraph 5, the Applicant admits that it is using
`
`the mark, REACH THE CHILDREN, but denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the other allegations set forth in said paragraph.
`
`616093-Answer to Note of Opposition-8/13/2003
`
`

`
`
`
`3.
`
`In response to the allegations of paragraph 6, the Applicant admits that it uses the
`
`''‘t
`
`I
`
`._'_t
`
`mark, REACH THE CHILDREN, to identify educational services (IC041) and medical services
`
`fl. (IC042), but denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth ofthe
`Ti: 1::
`
`remaining allegations set forth in said paragraph.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`The Applicant denies the allegations of paragraph 7.
`
`To the extent that the allegations set forth in the Notice have not been responded
`
`to above, they are denied.
`
`In further answer to the Notice, the Applicant asserts that:
`
`6.
`
`Since 1999, the Applicant has owned and used in both interstate and international
`
`commerce the mark, REACH THE CHILDREN, in connection with educational services,
`
`namely providing courses of instruction and vocational education at the primary and secondary
`
`level to children, and medical services, namely the operation of a medical clinic and the
`
`provision of medical services outside the clinic.
`
`7.
`
`The Applicant’s use of its mark has been widespread, through its display of
`
`Applicant’s mark throughout the world, as evidenced by the following:
`
`a.
`
`Selection by a national airline advertiser for inclusion in an advertisement
`
`placed in the seat backs of several national airlines.
`
`b.
`
`The Placement of two billboards in Salt Lake City, Utah during the 2002
`
`Winter Olympics.
`
`c.
`
`The placement of the Applicant’s mark in the 37 retail outlets from St.
`
`Louis, Missouri to Seattle, Washington in conjunction with the retailer’s campaign on the
`
`Applicant’s behalf to gather school supplies and blankets for African children. The
`
`616093-Answer to Note of Opposition-8/13/2003
`
`

`
`
`
`Applicant’s mark was also featured in the catalog that was mailed nationwide to the
`
`retailer’s mail order customers.
`
`(1.
`
`The presence of chapters of the Applicant in nine states and the District of
`
`E3
`
`Columbia.
`
`e.
`
`The use of the Applicant’s mark in fund raising that has resulted in
`
`contributions from donors in 39 states, including Florida, the District of Columbia and
`
`Canada.
`
`f.
`
`The use of the Applicant’s mark in conjunction with the Uhuru Open
`
`National Golf Tour, which holds fund-raising golf tournaments throughout the United
`
`States.
`
`g.
`
`Numerous references to the Applicant’s mark on Internet web sites,
`
`including the Applicant’s web site: www.reachthechildren.org.
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Opposer has had knowledge of the Applicant’s
`
`use of the mark, REACH THE CHILDREN, for a considerable length of time, by reason of the
`
`fact that the Applicant has used its mark in the State of Florida, on more than a token basis,
`
`where the Opposer is located.
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Opposer has further been aware of the
`
`Applicant’s use of its mark by reason of the fact that the Applicant has operated its website under
`
`the URL www.reachthechildren.org.
`
`10.
`
`Notwithstanding the Opposer’s knowledge of the Applicant’s use of the mark,
`
`REACH THE CHILDREN, the Opposer made no effort to stop the Applicant from using this
`
`mark until the Applicant filed its application for registration of the mark and the mark was
`
`published for opposition in April 2003.
`
`616093-Answer to Note of Opposition-8/13/2003
`
`

`
`
`
`‘5
`I
`1'
`,. ...~
`1 “'1!
`1.. ..
`1- ,.a.
`
`$52..’
`1‘ .J’
`
`I
`
`I
`
`11.
`
`The Applicant has expended much effort and money since 1999 in identifying its
`
`services with the mark, REACH THE CHILDREN.
`
`12.
`
`By reason of its laches, the Opposer should not now be allowed to prevent the
`
`Applicant fiom obtaining registration of its mark.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Opposer has abandoned its mark REACH THE
`
`CHILDREN, by reason of the fact that for a period of at least two years prior to the date of the
`
`Notice, the Opposer has failed to make bona fide use of the mark in the ordinary course of the
`
`Opposer’s trade, other than a token use intended merely to reserve a right in the mark.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED V
`
`14.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, the Applicant asks that this opposition proceeding be
`
`dismissed and that its registration issue forthwith.
`
` Leslie W. Keman, Jr., Esq.
`
`LACY, KATZEN, RYEN & MITT
`Attorneys for the Applicant
`Office and Post Office Address
`
`The Granite Building
`130 East Main Street
`
`Rochester, New York 14604-1686
`
`Telephone: (585) 454-5650
`
`TO:
`
`Jonathan Cohen, Esq.
`SCHUTTS & BOWEN, LLP
`Attorneys for the Opposer
`1500 Miami Center
`
`201 South Biscayne Boulevard
`Miami, Florida 33131
`
`616093-Answer to Note of Opposition~8/13/2003
`
`

`
`
`
`lkernan@lacykatzen.com
`Direct Dial: (585) 324-5702
`
`
`777%
`
`LESLIE W. KERNAN, JR., ESQ.
`Partner
`
`
`
`_< Lacy, Katzen,
`$5 Ryen & Mittleman, LLP
`
`if: it?
`
`August 13, 2003
`
`VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL COURIER
`
`Patent & Trademark Office
`
`P.O. Box TTAB No Fee
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`South Tower, Suite 9B4O
`
`Arlington, Virginia 22202-3513
`
`~/"’"'”‘
`
`Re:
`
`Reach The Children Foundation, Inc. vs. Reach The Children, Inc.
`
`Federal Servicemark Application Serial No. 76/103,000454
`Opposition No. 91156603
`
`Dear Sir or Madam:
`
`in the above-referenced
`the Applicant
`On behalf of our client, Reach the Children, Inc.,
`opposition proceeding, enclosed are the Applicant’s Answer to the Notice of Opposition and an
`Affidavit of Service of the Answer upon the attorneys for the opposer.
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`LACY, KATZEN, RYEN & MITTLEMAN, LLP
`
`</3-<-W‘
`
`Leslie W. Kernan, Jr.
`
`LWK/meb
`
`cc:
`
`Kevin Clawson (w/ enc.)
`
`",3?
`
`~19
`(.0
`|\>
`
`-
`7 '
`3
`
`The Granite Building — 130 East Main Street — Rochester, NY 14604-1686 — Tel. 585-454-5650 — Fax 585-454-6525
`www.lacykatzen.com
`
`Bankruptcy and Debtor Relief 0 Civil and Criminal Litigation 0 Collection & Creditor Services 0 Corporate Banking and B
`Divorce and Family Law 0 Employment Law 0 Estates, Trusts and Elder Law Services 0 Municipal Law
`Personal Injury and Wrongful Death 0 Real Estate Services 0 Wills & Estate Planning
`
`usines
`
`aw

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket