throbber
e‘;
`IlllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`03-10-2003
`
`U.S, Pauent & TMOfcITM Mail Flcpt Dt. #01
`
`IN THE ,UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`a BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of Application Serial No. 78/092,463
`Published in the Ofiicial Gazette on January 7, 2003 at TM 144
`
`The Chicago Skateboard Company d/b/a
`Uprise Skateshop,
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Apache Minnesota Thom McAn, Inc.
`
`Applicant.
`
`BOX TTAB
`
`FEE
`
`Assistant Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513
`
`Opposition No.
`
`\y;\./\/\/\/\/\/\../\/s./\/
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`The Chicago Skateboard Company, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the State of Illinois, doing business as Uprise Skateshop and having its principal place of
`
`business at 1820 North Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60647 ("Opposer") believes that it
`
`will be damaged by registration of the mark shown in Serial Number 78/092,463 and hereby
`
`opposes the same. As grounds for its opposition, Opposer states:
`
`1.
`
`Apache Minnesota Thom McAn, Inc., ("Applicant") seeks to register the mark
`
`UPRISE for "footwear and clothing, namely,
`
`shirts,
`
`t-shirts,
`
`sweatshirts,
`
`jackets, pants,
`
`sweatpants, shorts, hats, gloves and socks," "sporting goods and equipment, namely, skateboards,
`
`inline skates, snowboards, and related accessories therefore, namely, wheels, bearings, bindings,
`
`wax, safety straps and carriers; pads and padding for skateboarding,
`
`inline skating and
`
`03/24/2003
`
`IWIDERSO 00000075 78092563 -
`
`01 FC:6402
`
`300.00 OP
`
`

`
`
`
`snowboarding," and "retail store services in the field of footwear, clothing, and sporting goods
`
`and equipment" (hereinafter Applicant's goods and services), as stated in an intent—to-use
`
`application filed November 8, 2001 and published in the Official Gazette of January 7, 2003 at
`
`. TM 144.
`
`2.
`
`Since at least as early as 1996, Opposer or its predecessor has used the mark
`
`UPRISE in connection with the sale of a wide variety of goods and services in the skateboarding
`
`industry. Such goods and services include but are not limited to the retail sale of skateboarding
`
`equipment, clothing, and other related merchandise. Additionally,
`
`through its widespread
`
`involvement
`
`in skateboarding culture through the production and sponsorship of musical
`
`performances and skateboarding events, Opposer provides a wide range of goods and services
`
`through which the name UPRISE has become well known.
`
`3.
`
`Opposer's use the mark UPRISE is prior to that of Applicant's. Applicant filed its
`
`Intent to Use application on November 8, 2001, which is subsequent to the date Opposer’s mark
`
`was first used in commerce. Opposer’s rights in and to its UPRISE mark and name are superior
`
`to App1icant’s rights in its UPRISE application by virtue of Opposer’s prior longstanding use of
`
`the mark UPRISE in interstate commerce within the United States.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer has expended significant resources in the promotion and advertising of
`
`services under the UPRISE mark and name. Accordingly, Opposer has built a substantial
`
`reputation among its consumers that contributes to the goodwill that its consumers associate with
`
`the UPRISE mark.
`
`5.
`
`Applicant's proposed mark is intended to identify goods and services that are highly
`
`similar to the goods and services provided by Opposer. The class of consumers to whom
`
`Applicant sells or offers for sale its goods and services is identical to the class of consumers that
`
`

`
`
`
`purchase goods and services under Opposer's mark. The purchasers of Opposer's goods and
`
`services are comprised of consumers that place a substantial amount of emphasis on brand names,
`
`and develop strong loyalties thereto.
`
`6.
`
`Opposer’s and Applicant's goods and services are marketed in similar channels of
`
`trade, namely through retail stores, sponsorship of skateboarding activities, and through use on
`
`Internet websites.
`
`7.
`
`App1icant’s proposed mark UPRISE is identical
`
`in sound and appearance to
`
`Opposer’s mark UPRISE.
`
`8.
`
`Applicant's proposed UPRISE mark so nearly resembles Opposer’s mark as to be
`
`likely to be confused with and mistaken for Opposer’s mark. Applicant’s mark is deceptively
`
`similar to Opposer’s marks so as to cause confusion and lead to deception as to the origin of
`
`Applicant’s goods and services associated with the mark.
`
`9.
`
`If Applicant is permitted to use and register the subject mark for its services as
`
`specified in Application serial number 78/092,463, it will cause confusion in trade, as well as damage
`
`and injury to Opposer. Persons familiar with Opposer’s marks would be likely to seek Applicant’s
`
`services as and for those of Opposer. Any such confusion in trade inevitably would result in loss of
`
`sales to Opposer. Furthermore, any defect, objection or fault found with App1icant’s goods and/or
`
`services marketed under its mark would necessarily reflect upon and seriously injure the reputation
`
`that the Opposer has established for its goods and services marketed under its mark.
`
`10.
`
`If Applicant were granted the registration it seeks, it would have at least a prima
`
`facie exclusive right to use the mark UPRISE.
`
`11.
`
`Registration of Applicant's proposed mark would be a source of damage and injury
`
`to Opposer.
`
`

`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that the application Serial No. 78/092,463 be rejected, and
`
`that the mark therein sought for the goods and services recited be denied and refused.
`
`A duplicate copy of this Notice of Opposition and the fee of $300 required in §2.6(a)(17)
`
`.are enclosed. The Commissioner is authorized to charge payment of any additional fees
`
`associated with this filing or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account No. 04-0257 (Davis,
`
`Mannix & McGrath).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`THE CHICAGO SKATEBO ~RD COMPANY
`
` One of its attomey/
`
`William T. McGrath
`
`Kevin A. Thompson
`Evan D. Brown
`
`DAVIS, MANNIX & MCGRATH
`
`125 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 1700
`
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 332-3033 (Voice)
`(312) 332-6376 (Fax)
`
`Dated:
`
`:77 O O03
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF EXPRESS MAILING
`
`"Express Mail" mailing label number:
`
`_ _ E V ]_l 1, [3 5 7‘ 1, E. 7 3 U S
`
`Date of Deposit:
`
`:1//Q Q 3
`
`I hereby certify that the NOTICE OF OPPOSITION is being deposited with the United
`' States Postal Service as Express Mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to Box
`TTAB FEE, Commissioner for Trademarks, 2900 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia
`22202-3513 on the date indicated above.
`
`=
`
`Date Signature
`
`I
`ature
`
`Si
`
`-
`
`,
`
`%:q9
`
`rrnted Name
`
`

`
`
`
`..-\
`
`DAVIS, MANNIX & MCGRATH
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`125 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE
`SUITE 1700
`CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606-4402
`(312) 332-3033
`
`f
`
`March 10, 2003
`
`FAX (312) 332-6376
`
`Via Express Mail
`-BOX TTAB
`
`FEE
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513
`
`Re:
`
`A Notice of Opposition — UPRISE — No. 78/092 463
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Enclosed please find the following documents:
`
`1) The Original and two copies of the Notice of Opposition for the mark
`UPRISE, Serial Number 7 8/092,463 filed on behalf of The Chicago
`Skateboard. Company d/b/a Uprise Skateshop;
`2) A Check in the amount of $300.00 as the filing fee;
`3) A postcard for confirmation of your receipt of this correspondence.
`
`08=6W?L2810%80
`
`The Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge payment of any additional fees
`associated with this filing to Deposit Account No. 04-0257 (Davis, Mannix & McGrath).
`A duplicate copy of this letter is enclosed for charging purposes.
`'
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`DAVIS, MANNIX & MCGRATH
`
`Regina Westry
`Legal Assistant
`
`RLW/St
`
`Enclosures

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket