throbber
BULKY DOCUMENTS
`
`(exceeds 300 pages)
`
`Proceeding] Serial No: 9 / / g 92/ C3
`
`Filed: 8’31*" Of»
`
`Title;
`
`LWPQ.
`
`5fiC\‘Q/IQ-Q)
`
`(22039 0 /1 is r J2;/Hm /$1—/Z
`<J¢
`§»€,fl«€/t
`J‘
`=-fig/{CI/‘Ff/e'§‘
`fl7“€/14¢/“fir/V/C//VI
`
`Part
`
`Of
`
`

`
`01
`
`‘E=
`
`.
`
`E5N-
`
`1 5O
`
`gI
`
`IV!
`
`5 EH
`
`i''I
`
`B. OPCAB. n=8
`
`Eilfiéfafi
`
`Pro
`
`40
`
`60
`120
`Time [min]
`
`300
`
`-0-— LV Epicard Anterior
`LV Endocard Anterior
`
`Fig. 1 A to D Anterior wall myocardial blood
`flow in pigs before. during 60 minutes sur-
`gery. one and four hours after operative
`myocardial revascularisation performed by
`(A) cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiople-
`gic arrest (group ECC). (B) off-pump coro-
`nary artery bypass grafting (group OPCAB).
`(C) lmpella° elect 100 supported beating
`heart surgery (group tmpella). (D) sham op-
`eration (group Sham}: -0- left ventricular
`anterior wall epicardial blood flow. "0" left
`ventricular anterior wall endocardial blood
`flow. Values are means i standard error of
`mean. N gives numbers of animals per
`group. ‘ Signifies p < 0.05 versus pre surgery
`myocardial blood flow and ' signifies p < 0.05
`between groups.
`
`0. Sham, n-=8
`
`Intervention
`7//IIIII1
`
`
`
`Pro
`
`60
`40
`120
`Time {min}
`
`300
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`
`
`
`
`regionalbloodflow{mIi‘100gxmln]
`
`8 regional
`
`bloodflow[m|i'100gm1in] NI
`

`

`
`08
`
`Pra
`
`120
`60
`4o
`Timofmin]
`
`300
`
`= [H 0,05 statistically significant different from baseline
`fl : p< 0.05 statistically significant different between groups
`
`?
`§ 400
`8'
`3
`fr; 30° _'..._
`%
`‘
`G 200
`E
`2
`‘3 100
`g
`2
`E’
`
`7:
`E. 400
`en
`8
`E 30°
`3
`I: 200
`‘D
`3
`_-E
`to
`.5
`S
`
`100
`
`o
`
`C. Impella, n'-=8
`
`
`
`Pra
`
`40
`
`120
`so
`Time [min]
`
`300
`
`o
`
`6% (Braun. Melsungen, Germany) were infused before pump in-
`sertion. The correct position was checked by diastolic pressure
`difference between the aortic and the left ventricular diastolic
`pressure [It]. Rotation speed was adjusted so that maximum
`ventricular unloading could be achieved. The lmpella pump ran
`for 60 minutes and as in group it the stabilisator was in place for
`60 minutes. The anastomosis was sutured in the same way as in
`group II and after completion the bulldog Clamp also stayed on
`the graft until the 40th minute.
`
`I-Iernodynamic parameters and myocardial contractility
`Heart rate, left and right atrial pressure. left ventricular pressure.
`mean arterial and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were re-
`corded on a Sirecust 1280 (Siemens. Nilrnberg. Germany) at dif-
`ferent time points (see Fig.1). Cardiac output was continuously
`determined and displayed on a Vigilance Monitor (Edwards Life-
`sciences, Unterschleissheirn. Germany). Left ventricular pressure
`first derivative over time was calculated and displayed on a Sys-
`tem 6+ hemodynamic module (Triton Technology. San Diego,
`USA). Heart rate. left and right atrial pressure. left ventricular
`pressure. and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were not re-
`corded during extracorporeal circulation.
`
`Craft patency
`Verification of graft patency was assessed by a CM 1005 transit
`time flow meter with a 3-mm probe (Cardio Med Gmbfl. Tau!‘-
`kirchen. Germany). The probe was placed 15 to 25 mm proximal
`to the anastomosis.
`
`Myocardial perfusion measurement
`Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was examined at baseline. twice
`during the surgical procedure (40 and 60 minutes) and 1 hour
`(I20 minutes) and 4 hours (300 minutes) after bypass by fluores-
`cence labelled microspheres (Molecular probes. Leiden. Nether-
`lands) as previously described [12]. Two million spheres per col-
`our were injected in a randomised manner into the left atrium
`over 30 seconds via the left atrial catheter. A reference blood
`sample of 10 ml was withdrawn from theabdominal aorta over
`a 3-minute period starting 30 seconds before microsphere's in-
`jection with a syringe pump ('l‘SE model 540210. Bad Homburg.
`Germany}. At the end of the experiment the heart was removed
`from the chest and rinsed with sterile saline and immersed in
`
`4% paraformaldehyde. After 7 to 10 days immersion three 5- to
`7-mm sections were cut at the height of the anastomosis. above.
`and underneath. Per section the left ventricular part was divided
`into 4 sectors (anterior. lateral. posterior. and septal) and every
`sector was separated into an endo- and an epicardial aspect. The
`right ventricular part was divided into an anterior and a posteri-
`or sector and both sectors were separated into an endo- and an
`epicardial aspect. Every specimen was finally divided in two
`parts. So. in total, 72 areas resulted. For digestion and dye extrac-
`tion we used a previously published protocol H2]. Myocardial
`blood flow values below 20 mllmin x 100 g were assumed as crit-
`ical low flow areas resulting in reduced myocardial function [13].
`
`Statistics
`
`Data are presented as mean 1 SEM. Statistical analysis was per-
`formed with Sigma Stat 3.0 (jandel Scientific Corp.. San Rafael,
`USA). The statistical significance of changes from baseline values
`
`Bierbadt B et al. Effect of Different
`
`Thorac Cardiov Surg 2005: 53: 103- I09
`
`EDWARDS 004832
`
`

`
`within each group was tested with repeated measures ANOVA.
`Differences between groups were statistically analysed by one-
`way ANOVA comparing several groups. 11 values did not show a
`normal distribution. ANOVA for nonparametric values (Kruskal
`Wallis test) with multiple comparison method (Student-New-
`man-Keul's test) was used. Statistical significance was accepted
`at an error probability ofps0.05.
`
`Results
`
`All animals survived surgery and the post interventional 4-hour
`period. All constructed anastomoses showed acceptable flow
`without significant differences between groups. The observed
`flow patterns revealed no signs of bypass obstruction. in group 1
`norepinephrine had to be administered to maintain an adequate
`perfusion pressure. Maximum close was 18.75 iigfkg x h.
`
`Hemodynamic parameters
`The hemodynamic changes during and after myocardial revascu-
`larisation are summarized in Table 1. During surgery only the
`timepoint at 30 minutes is displayed. For immediate reactions
`after surgery the timepoint 70 minutes is shown. as is timepoint
`300 minutes for early changes after surgery.
`
`Hemodynamic impairment in response to extracorporeal circu-
`lation with cardioplegic arrest was observed regularly with de-
`creased MAP. tachycardia. and the need for vasopressor applica-
`tion(911 3 to6813 and 71 13mmHgaswell as6314Io 12017
`and 10418 beatsfmin). Cardiac output was slightly elevated
`immediately after aortic cross-clamp opening and returned to
`baseline values at the end ofthe observation period. Left ventric-
`ular contractility was significantly increased early after separa-
`tion from cardiopulmonary bypass. even before vasopressors
`were administered and normalised to starting point values
`(23591157_ 35741409. and 22961105 mmHg[s). Filling pres-
`sures, left ventricular and mean pulmonary artery pressure re-
`mained unchanged.
`
`During off-pump bypass grafting hemodynamic deterioration
`occurred with statistically significant decreases in cardiac out-
`put, mean arterial pressure. left ventricular pressure. and left
`ventricular contractility (4.8 1 0.3 to 3.410.2 llmin. 92 1 5 to
`79 14mmHg. 12616 to 10015 mmHg. and 25191296 to
`1666 1 147 mm Hgls. respectively). Cardiac output. mean arterial
`and left ventricular pressure as well as left ventricular contractil-
`ity did not recover baseline values. In opposition filling and mean
`pulmonary artery pressure remained within physiological
`ranges. However, no conversion to bypass grafting with extracur-
`poreal circulation due to the observed hemodynamic deteriora-
`tion was necessary.
`
`The impel|a° elect 100 assisted bypass grafting showed milder
`hemodynarnic impainnent compared to the off-pump proce-
`dure. Pump flow ranged from 1.9 to 3.51/min. Initiation of me-
`chanical unloading resulted in a decrease in left atrial pressure.
`a significant reduction of ventricular pressure. and LV pressure
`first derivative. Additionally. the left ventricular contractility re-
`covered completely after four hours. Cardiac output and mean
`arterial pressure drop off could be reduced compared to OPCAB
`
`Blerbach B et al. Effect of Different ... ‘Elnora: Cardiov Surg 2005: 5]: ‘I03 - I09
`
`(4.710.4 to 4.0102 and 9113 to 841 3 mmHg). but still re-
`mained statistically significant although it returned to control
`levels at
`the end of
`the experiment
`(4.3 1 0.2 |,lmin and
`80 1 2 mm Hg). In contrast to off-pump bypass grafting tachycar-
`dia was noticed postoperative1y(95 1 7 beatsfmin). Mean pulmo-
`nary artery pressure was slightly elevated in this group through-
`out the whole experiment due to preoperative volume loading.
`All groups showed a mild increase in MPAP immediately after
`termination ofsurgery at the time of protamine administration.
`
`Regional myocardial perfusion
`Left ventricular epi- and endocardial myocardial blood flow of
`the anterior wall at the level ofthe anastomosis is shown in Fig. 1.
`The other areas studied displayed similar flow courses.
`
`All baseline values in the 72 specimens from both ventricles re-
`vealed no statistical difference between the studied groups (epi-
`cardial blood flow: 107 1 8. range: 50 to 220 rnlfmin x100 g: en-
`docardial blood flow: 118 1 11. range: 46 to 302 mllmin x 100g).
`
`As expected during aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic arrest
`no myocardial perfusion in any observed specimen could be
`found. Reactive hyperemia occured during early reperfusion uni-
`formly without regional hypoperfusion (epicardial blood flow:
`214 119. range: 81 to 402 mlfmin x 100g and endocardial blood
`flow: 235123. range: 104 to 454 mlfminx 100g). 80 minutes
`(t= 120 min) after cross-clamp opening increased myocardial
`blood flow was still present (Fig.1 A}. Even at the end ofthe ex-
`periment myocardial blood flow exceeded baseline values. Low
`flow was detected only in four specimens in one animal but ofa
`total of 576 specimens at the end (Fig.2).
`
`Off-pump surgery with shunt insertion created only a mild and
`not significant decrease in myocardial perfusion in both ven-
`tricles during stabilisator placement (epicardial blood flow:
`8618, range: 19 to 158 mljminx 100g and endocardial blood
`flow: 9617. range: 25 to 146 mllmin x 100 g} (Fig. I B). After sur-
`gery myocardial blood flow reached baseline values. Two ani-
`mals presented with sporadic myocardial low flow during sur-
`gery (t-40 minutes 1 area and t=60 minutes 4 and 5 areas)
`(Fig.2).
`
`During microaxial blood pump support myocardial blood flow
`also decreased mildly in all areas (epicardial blood flow: 8418.
`range:
`11
`to 193 ml,lminx100g and endocardial blood flow:
`9117, range: 21 to168 ml]minx100g) (Fig.1C). After surgery
`myocardial blood flow returned to baseline values. Six animals
`had myocardial low flow during surgery in 1 to 18 areas. One
`specimen was hypoperfused immediately after surgery, while
`four hours after surgery in three animals I to 16 specimens again
`showed myocardial low perfusion (Fig. 2).
`
`There were no significant changes in myocardial blood flow in
`the control group (Fig.1D). Myocardial low flow occurred in
`eleven specimens in two animals at 60 minutes and in one ani-
`mal in three areas at 120 and 300 minutes (Fig. 2).
`
`EDWARDS 004833
`
`O3
`
`.
`‘E.:1
`E.
`
`n 5
`
`':
`Eo
`<HI
`
`OH EI
`
`IW
`
`

`
`Table 1 Hemodynamic variables in pigs before. during. 10 minutes. and four hours alter operative myocardial revascularisation performed by
`cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest (group 1 KC). olf-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (group 2 OPCAB). Impeller”
`elect I00 supported beating heart surgery (group 3 lrnpella), sham operation (group 4 Sham}; CVP: central venous pressure, dpldt:
`left ventricular pressure first derivative over time. LAP: left atrial pressure. LVP: left ventricuiar pressure. MAP: mean arterial pressure
`and MPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure. Vaiues are means : standard error of mean. N gives numbers of animals per group
`
`Baseline
`Surgery
`70 min
`300 min
`
`
`01
`
`".
`‘E.:1
`
`2r
`
`snaQ
`Eo
`-=
`InW
`
`H EI
`
`i‘I
`
`l04:B'i1
`3014
`951'i“d
`70:3
`
`4.6 10.3
`4.210.}
`4.3 1 0.2
`4.3 1 0.2‘
`
`71:3‘
`7013'
`80:2‘
`8012'
`
`21:2
`Nil
`25 :16:
`19:1
`
`611
`_
`910.4
`,
`
`l20:7'#
`7415
`87:i"#
`65:3
`
`I
`4.9 1 0.4
`3910.3‘
`4.2 1 0.3
`4.3 1 0.2‘
`.
`68i3‘#
`8013'
`82:2‘
`B813
`
`21:2
`19:2
`24: I
`21:!
`
`'
`
`"
`
`-
`
`,5
`
`r
`
`.‘
`5:!
`Til
`8:1
`Bil
`
`_
`
`:
`'
`5:1
`7:1
`9:]
`
`_
`
`,
`
`-
`
`—
`‘M13
`78144
`66:2
`
`3
`
`-4 ‘-.»
`.‘
`4.5 1 0.2
`3.410.2'#
`4.0: 0.2
`4.6: 0.1
`'
`'
`67i4'#
`79:4'#
`84:3‘
`9113
`'
`
`-
`18:1
`23 :11?
`
`
`—
`i0i'| '
`8:1
`Bil
`
`‘'
`
`'.
`
`'
`
`_
`
`,_
`
`6
`
`3 -,-35; ‘ls
`-
`
`.-
`
`,
`
`8:1
`11:!!!
`
`6314
`6713
`6512
`64:2
`
`4.5 1 0.2
`4.8103
`4.7 10.4
`4,910.2
`
`91:3
`92:5
`9| :3
`8814
`
`1711
`17:‘!
`23 :2#
`18:1
`
`71]
`7i1
`9:]
`8:1
`
`.
`6:1
`7:1
`10:1
`
`
`
`Heart rate (min")
`Groupll.'CC(n-8)
`Group2OPCAB(n-8)
`Group 3l'mpella{n-8)
`Group4Sho,m(n=8)
`
`Cardiac output (l/min)
`Group I ECC (n = 8)
`Group20PCAB(n-8)
`Group 3 lmpella (:1 -8)
`Group 4 Sham (n = 8)
`MAP(mmHg}
`Groupl.ECC(n=3)
`Group2OPCAB{n-8)
`Group3lmpello(n-8}
`Group4Sham 01-8)
`MPAP(mrriH'gJ
`CmuptECC(n=8}
`Group2OPCAB{n=8)
`Group 3 impeila (n = 8)
`Group4$ham[n-8)
`
`l'.i-l.P‘(minHg)'
`GrouplECC(n-8)
`Cruup20FCAB(n-E]
`Group3lmpello (n=8)
`Group4Sham(n-3)
`
`cvP.ri_rrrn{49J
`Group1ECC(n-8)
`Group20PCABfn-8)
`Group3i'mpello{n-8)
`Group 4 Sham (n- 8)
`
`. .
`Group I ECC (n -8}
`Group2OPCAB(n-8)
`Group3rmpello(n-3)
`Group
`

`
`
`
`12616
`11313
`
`I00:5'#
`98:4'#
`118:4
`
`102:5’
`10413‘
`114:3
`
`105:5‘
`10713‘
`115:4
`
`
`
`V
`
`'
`:4;
`~.
`1-
`.
`.—
`~»
`22961105
`35741409‘
`—
`2359 1157
`Group I ECC tn - 8)
`21311185’
`17501174’
`16661147?!
`25191296
`Group2OFCA8[n-8)
`22361162
`2173 1154
`1773 : 75'!
`2433 1117
`Group 3 impeIla(n - 8)
`
`
`
`
`Group 4 Sham (n =8) 1937: 69‘ 26771 93 2341188’ 2264: 105‘
`
`' p < 0.05 versus pre surgery myocardial blood flow: it p < 0.05 between groups
`
`Discussion
`
`In our study. we observed hemodynamic impairment in all treat-
`ed groups. Most markedly it was seen in the ECC group with the
`need for vasopressor administration. Hypotension occurred
`
`although increased cardiac output and global left ventricular
`contractility was present as already described [1]. This observa-
`tion is related to the well~described inflammatory triggered post
`perfusion syndrome I 14]. In addition. released N0. which is stim-
`ulated by the surgical inflammatory response. contributes to the
`
`Bierbacb B et al. Effect of Different
`
`fliorac Cardiov Surg 2005; 53: 103- ‘I09
`
`EDWARDS 004834
`
`

`
`——&«---—~ HLM,n=8
`
`Off_pump_|-‘=3
`
`—v— ImpeI|a.n=8
`._._0.._.
`Sham, n=8
`
`‘ = p< 0,05 statistically significant
`different from baseline
`# = p< 0.05 statistically significant
`
`Fig. 2 Number of myocardial low flow areas
`in pigs before. during 60 minutes surgery,
`one and four hours after operative myocar-
`dial revascularisation performed by cardio-
`pulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest
`(group ECC — —A——l, oil-pump coronary ar-
`tery bypass grafting (group OPCAB - - I- -).
`lrnpella" elect 100 supported beating heart
`surgery (group lmpella —V—), sham opera-
`tion (group Sham — -0- —); values are means
`i standard error of mean. N gives numbers
`of animals per group. ‘ Signilies p < 0.05
`versus pre surgery myocardial blood flow
`and ' signifies p < 0.05 between groups.
`
`different between groups
`
`Intervention
`
`J
`. ‘no I uafl-'£.'."‘
`
`
`
`
`
`Numbersofmyocardiallow-flowareas
`
`O2
`
`.
`‘E.3
`
`Eni
`
`n'1
`E:a
`I58
`
`<I
`
`H EU"
`
`'I
`
`pro
`
`40
`
`60
`
`300
`
`Time [min]
`
`increase in cardiac output that accompanies the reduced sys-
`temic vascular resistance after cardiovascular surgery [15]. Fur-
`thermore. hypotension is caused by extracorporeal circulation
`through generation of serotonin from pump-activated platelets
`triggered by nitric oxide release 116]. One simple aspect of the
`negative influence on peripheral resistance could be the cardio-
`plegic solution which is drained into systemic circulation using a
`two-stage venous cannula |l7.l8|. Normothermic body temper-
`ature during coronary bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary by-
`pass and hypothermic crystalloid cardioplegia is one major fac-
`tor reducing systemic vascular resistance I18}. In opposition to
`our findings reduced ventricular contractility was observed in a
`porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass without cardioplegia
`and in a canine model with blood cardioplegia due to myocardial
`edema |l9.20].
`
`During off-pump bypass grafting hemodynamic instability was
`still tolerated in all animals without inotropic support. Cardiac
`output altered significantly during revascularisation more mark-
`edly than reported previously |3]. In contrast to earlier findings
`significant but not critical changes in MAP, LVP, LAP, and global
`left ventricular contractility occurred during surgery [3]. This
`might be related to the extended duration (60 minutes) of me-
`chanical anterior wall stabilisation. Additionally approximately
`half of the left ventricle‘s free anterior was compressed by the
`stabilisator used. This could be the reason for incomplete and de-
`layed hemodynamic recovery. Previous publications without he-
`modynamic impairment caused by OPCAB surgery employed
`much shorter interventions [21 I. The idea of a 60-minute inter-
`ventional period in our model was used to simulate a multivessel
`procedure and for the concordance ofthe surgical period in each
`experimental group.
`
`The use of the lmpella’ microaxial blood pump for left ventric-
`ular support during beating heart myocardial revascularisation
`achieved ventricular unloading as indicated by the fall in LAP. Re-
`
`Blerbach B at at. Effect of Different
`
`Thorac Cardlov Surg 2005; 53: 103 — 109
`
`cently similar findings were observed in an ovine model for mi-
`croaxial pump support reducing infarct size I ll ].
`
`In addition, augmented cardiac output and preserved global left
`ventricular contractility during and after surgery compared to
`the OPCAB group in our study were present.
`
`The major finding in our study were the results of regional myo-
`cardial perfusion. ECC with cardioplegia in contrast to earlier
`studies revealed uniform reperfusion after 40 minutes‘ cardio-
`plegic arrest without signs of microvascular obstruction 122]. As
`described by other groups transient rnicrovascular obstruction as
`well as malperfusion after cold crystalloid cardioplegic arrest
`were not found [22,23].
`
`There was no negative effect on regional myocardial perfusion
`although hemodynamic alteration occured during OPCAB sur-
`gery. The major reason was the shunt insertion into the U\D's ar»
`teriotomy |6|. Reduced ventricular contractility during surgery
`due to hypoperfusion could therefore be excluded. Surgical trau-
`ma results in an inflammatory response contributing to media-
`tor release and myocardial depression after cardiovascular sur-
`gery [15]. In support of this conclusion control animals showed
`decreases in MAP, cardiac output and global left ventricular con-
`tractility at the end of the observation period.
`
`Although the microaxial blood pump mitigates hemodynamic
`alterations, no improvement in regional myocardial perfusion is
`observed. Even worse. sporadic myocardial low flow was seen.
`This might be due to microembolies generated by the intracar-
`diac pump. A high pump speed might be able to produce gaseous
`microembolies by cavitation. In addition the pump caused suc-
`tion to the ventricular wall during external ventricular compres-
`sion. thereby also creating cavitation. lnflammatory response to
`intracardiac pump operation creating cellular rnicroaggregates
`seems to be less probable. because a reduced inflammatory re-
`
`EDWARDS 004335
`
`

`
`O2
`
`na
`
`.
`‘P.5
`E’.
`s"Y
`E‘:o
`nIR
`
`<i
`
`H EmH
`
`sponse during and after pump run compared to cardiopulmo-
`nary bypass has been reported as indicated by a postoperative
`release of granulocyte elastase and complement C3a elevation
`[10]. Embolisation of plaque material can be excluded as an ex-
`planation. because no animal showed signs ofatherosclerosis at
`organ removal. Further clinical examinations should be per-
`formed to test the hypothesis of the clinical relevance of hetero-
`geneous microvascular obstruction l24l. One clinical limitation
`could be the lack of coronary artery disease in our model.
`
`In conclusion, the intracardiac microaxial support device aug-
`ments cardiac output during beating heart myocardial revascu-
`larisation in a porcine model but leads to microvascular low flow
`areas. In contrast. conventional techniques led to mild hemody-
`namic impairment but did not aggravate microvascular perfu-
`sion.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`This study was supported by the German Heart Foundation
`(project number F,l13,lD1 ). The disposals for cardiopulmonary by-
`pass were donated by Edwards PAS, Wiirrstadt. Germany. The
`lmpella elect 100” microaxial blood pumps were donated by lm-
`pella Cardiosystems. Aachen, Germany. We thank Mr. Mitch Mal-
`Zahfl. Mr. Laszlo Kopacz. and Mrs. Andrea Schollrnaier for their
`excellent technical support.
`
`References
`
`‘ Estafanous FG. Urzua J. Yared JP. Zuriclt AM. Loop FD. Tarazi RC. Pat-
`tern of hemodynamic alterations during coronary artery operations.
`]Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984: 872 175 -132
`1 Mishra M. Malhotra R. Mishra A. Meharwal ZS. Trehan N. Hemody-
`namic changes during displacement ofthe beating heart using epicar-
`dial stabilization for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.]
`Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 635-690
`3 Burfeind WR.jr. Duhaylongsod FG. Samuelson D. Leone B}.The effects
`of mechanical cardiac stabilization on left ventricular performance.
`Eur] Cardiothorac Surg 1993: 14: 285 - 289
`" Edgerton_lR. Dewey TM. Magee M]. Herbert MA. Prince SL Jones KK.
`Mack M]. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting:
`an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2003: 76:
`1138- 1142: discussion 1142- I143
`5 Otaki M. Ogawa T. lnoue T. Oltu H. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting
`to double vessel disease with the phannacological assist of esmolol.
`An experimental study.] Cardiovasc Surg {Torino) 2002; 43: 307- 311
`‘ Sepic J, Wee J0. Soltesz EG. Laurence RC. Aklog L lntraluminal coro-
`nary sbunting preserves regional myocardial perfusion and function.
`Heart Surg Forum 2003: 6: E12D— 125
`7 Sweeney MS. Frazier OH. Device-supported myocardial revasculariza-
`lion: safe help for sick hearts. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54: 1065-1070
`3 Lorin U. Peterzen B. Granfeldt H. Casimir Al-in I-L Coronary artery oper-
`ation with support of the Hemopump cardiac assist system. Ann
`Thorac Surg 1994: 58: 519-522: discussion 523
`
`9 Autschbach R. Rauch T, Engel M. Brose S. Ullmann C. Diegeler A. Mohr
`l-‘W. A new inlracardiac microaxial pump: first results of a multicen-
`ter study. A.rtif0rgans 2001: 25: 327- 330
`‘° Meyns B. Autschbach R. Boning A. Konertz W. Matschke K. Schondube
`F, Wiebe K. Fischer E. Coronary artery bypass grafting supported with
`intracardiac microaxial pumps versus normothermic cardiopulmo-
`nary bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Eur] Cardiothorac Surg
`2002: 22: 112-117
`" Meyns B. Stolir-ski]. Leunens V. Verbeken E. Flameng W. Left ventric-
`ular support by cathetenmounted axial flow pump reduces infarct
`size. I Am Coll Cardiol 2003: 41: 1087 -1095
`‘’ Horstick C. Berg 0. Heimann A. Contact 0. Loos M. Hafner G. Bierbach B.
`Petersen S. Bhakdi S. Darius H. Horstick M. Meyer]. Keinpski 0. Appli-
`cation ofC1-esterase inhibitor during reperfusion of ischemic myo-
`cardium: dose-related beneficial versus detrimental effects. Circula-
`tion ZOOI: 104: 3125-3131
`" Vatner SF. Correlation between acute reductions in myocardial blood
`flow and function in conscious dogs. Circ Res I980;-‘17: 201- 207
`" Wei M. Kuukasjarvi P. Lauriltlta J. Kaukinen S. Honkonen EL Metsanoja
`R, Tarkka M. Relation of cytokines to vasodilation after coronary ar-
`tery bypass grafting. Worldj Surg 2003: 27: I093 - I098
`‘5 Mitalta C, Yokoyama K. MorimotoT. Nosaka T. Sunamori M, lmai T. An
`increase in urinary nitritelnitrate excretion is associated with the hy-
`perdynamic state after cardiovascular surgery. Intensive Care Med
`2002: 28: 1103-1109
`'5 Borgdorff P. Feklces D. Tangelder C]. Hypotension caused by extracur-
`poreal circulation: serotonin from purnp-activated platelets triggers
`nitric oxide release. Circulation 2002; 106: 2538 — 2593
`V’ Busch T. Sirbu H. Kazmaier S. Aleltsic l. Friedrich M. Dalichau H. Buhte
`W. Single atriocaval cannulation is associated with increased inci-
`dence of ltypercirculatory failure after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann
`Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001 ; 7; 210- 215
`*3 Nappi G. Torelia M. Romano (3. Clinical evaluation of nonnothermic
`cardiopulmonary bypass and coid cardioplegia. J Cardiovasc Surg
`(Torino) 2002: 43: 31 - 36
`*9 Aybek T, Kahn MF. Dogan S. Abdel Rahman U. Mierdl S. Kessler P.
`Wimmer Greinecker G. Moritz A. Cardiopulmonary bypass impairs
`left ventricular function determined by conductance catheter mea-
`surement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003: 51: 301 — 315
`2° Mehlhorn U. Allen S]. Adams DL Davis KL Gogola GR. de Vivie ER.
`Laine GA. Normothermic continuous antegrade blood cardioplegia
`does not prevent myocardial edema and cardiac dysfunction. Circula-
`tion l995: 92: 1940-1945
`1' Dapunt OE. Raji MR.]eschlteit S. Dhein S. Kuhn Regnier F. Sudltarnp M.
`FischerJH. Mehlhorn U. lntracoronary shunt insertion prevents myo-
`cardial stunning in a juvenile porcine MIDCAB model absent of coro-
`nary artery disease. Eur] Cardiolhorac Surg 1999; 15: 173-178; dis-
`cussion 178 -179
`1’ Mittmann U. Baca I. Fey K. Saggau WW. Stadler R. Stieglitz HG. Starch
`H. Regional myocardial blood flow after hypothennic arrest and Car-
`dioplegia. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979: 27: 98 -103
`13 Pathi VL McPhaden AR. Morrison J. Belcher PR. Fennerjw. Martin W.
`McQuiston AM, Wheatley D]. The effects of cardioplegic arrest and re-
`perfusion on the microvasculature of the heart. Eur] Cardiothorac
`Surg1997: It: 350- 357
`3‘ Selvanayagamjfl. Petersen SE. Francis JM. Robson MD. Kardos A. Neu-
`bauer S. Taggart DP. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary
`surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomiz-
`ed trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and bio-
`chemical markers. Circulation 2004: 109: 345-350
`
`Bierbadn B at al. Effect of Different
`
`Thorac Cardlov Surg 2005: 53: 103 -109
`
`EDWARDS 004836
`
`

`
`European Heart Journal Supplements 12004} 6 (Supplement F), Fl51—l-‘G7
`
`
`
`EUROPEAN
`SOCIETY OF
`CA.R[lC'I.1Y
`
`The evaluation of right ventricular performance
`in different clinical models of heart failure
`
`Carlo Campana*, Michele Pasotti, Lorenzo Monti, Miriam Revera,
`Alessandra Serio, Luisa Nespoli, Giulia Magrini, Laura Scelsi, Stefano Ghio,
`Luigi Tavazzi
`
`Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico Son Matteo, Piozzale Golgi 2, Pavia 27100, Italy
`
`KEYWORDS
`Right ventricular function:
`
`E"d'5ta89*'E3'1fa“""?:
`::';"'°“a"1' "YP9"°'“i°"3
`
`Aim To evaluate the role of right ventricular function in different clinical models of
`heart failure_
`
`in WHO class III and IV
`Methods 22 patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH)
`(group A) were evaluated by echocardiography, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
`measurements and right heart catheterization at baseline and after a mean fol-
`low-up of 15 s 4 months. 63 patients with chronic heart failure of different etiol-
`ogy, NYHA class liIb—iV,
`followed-up for 18 1 3 months (group B), underwent
`echocardiography, BNP measurements, right heart catheterization at study entry
`and follow—up.
`Results In group A patients, among hemodynamic parameters consistent with
`severe PH, right atrial pressure significantly increased (from 6114.8 to 101 6.5
`mmHg, p < 0.01); BNP showed a negative correlation with right ventricular ejection
`fraction (r"'=0.46).
`In group B, mean left and right ventricular (therrnodilution)
`ejection fraction (RVEF) were 21 1 7% and 18 1 9%; BNP showed significant correla-
`tions with pulmonary wedge pressure (r = 0.48, p = 0.02) and right ventricular func-
`tion indices (RVEF and tricuspidal annular plane systolic excursion}.
`Conclusions A multiparametric right ventricular evaluation is useful even if several
`diagnostic and prognostic variables which were investigated in this study are not
`likely to show the same prognostic role in right and biventricular models of heart
`failure.
`
`0 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.
`
`Introduction
`
`Right ventricular function has not been extensively stud—
`ied until recenfly, because the right ven[ric[e was con.
`
`"Correspondence Carlo Carnpana MD Department of Cardiology
`facts Policlinico San Matteo, Piazzale Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Tel.:
`.39 3331 503459; fax: 399331 501271
`E-mail address: unita.sc@smatteo.pv.il cc. Campana).
`
`sidered to have a secondary role in the prognostic
`evaluation of several cardiac diseases, including chronic
`heart fa1'lUI'e-
`in addition. the 6ValU3li0n Of fight Ven-
`tricular fL|l'IC[iOl'I was diffiCU[t, because some diagnostic
`techniques were not efficient or easily reproducible.‘
`Radionuclide angiography is currently considered a useful
`diagnostic method; echocardiography depends on the
`accmacy °f ""a"V §55'f”‘F‘ti°"5 "_b°“t "e"m"-"tar 9e°""°'
`NY;
`the thermodilution technique, able t0 evaluate
`stroke volume and ejection fraction by catheter with a
`
`1520-765X/S - see front matter © 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.
`doi:10.1016lj.ehjsup.2004.09.012
`
`EDWARDS 004837
`
`

`
`F62
`
`fast response thermistor, shows good reproducibility in
`monitoring right ventricular function, but is an invasive
`technique.’
`The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution
`of right ventricular performance in two different clinical
`models of right ventricular dysfunction:
`the right ven-
`tricular impairment observed in patients with end-stage
`heart failure (HF) and the right ventricular dysfunction
`seen in patients affected by pulmonary hypertension
`(PH). The principal objectives were to evaluate the evo-
`lution of echocardiographic, Doppler and haemodynamic
`patterns related to right ventricular impairment and to
`identify possible correlations with neurohormonal sta-
`tus, as determined by brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
`levels.
`
`Methods
`
`Study population
`
`The study population consisted of 85 consecutive patients re-
`ferred to the Cardiac Failure Unit of the Department of Cardiol-
`ogy, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia from September 2000.
`The patients were divided into two groups according to the pres-
`ence of different diagnoses, defining a specific pathophysiologi-
`cal role of the right ventricle.
`Group A was formed of 22 patients with a diagnosis of pre-
`capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) and a model of isolated
`right ventricular failure.
`Group B was formed of 63 patients with severe chronic HF
`and a clinical pattern suggesting biventricular dysfunction.
`At entry into the study patients underwent a diagnostic eval-
`uation including haemodynamic measurements with right ven-
`tricular
`thermodilution_ determination
`and
`a Doppler
`echocardiographic study to assess left and right ventricular
`anatomy and function and to determine the haemodynamic pro-
`file in terms of pulmonary pressure and ventricular filling pres-
`sures. Functional status was assessed by the (:-min walking
`test (6MWT) in group A and by cardiopulmonary exercise testing
`(CPT) in group B.
`The study protocol established that baseline cardiac cathe-
`terlsation and echocardiographic and Doppler evaluations were
`performed within a few hours of each other. Right heart cathe-
`terisation controls were scheduled yearly; echocardiographic,
`Doppler, neurohormonal and functional status studies were to
`be carried out every 6 months.
`
`Cardiac catheterisation
`
`Cardiac catheterisation was achieved via the femoral or internal
`jugular vein, using a 7F modified Swan-Ganz catheter in
`conjunction with a computerised detection system of cardiac
`output and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), model
`REF-1‘ or Vigilance"'° {Edwards-Lifescierices, Santa Ana, CA,
`USA). The following measures were recorded or derived during
`the procedure: pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary wedge
`pressure, right atrial pressure, pulmonary vascular and arterio-
`iar resistances, systemic vascular resistances, cardiac output,
`right ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume, left and right
`ventricular stroke work.
`
`C. Campana et al.
`
`Echocardiographic and Doppler studies
`
`Doppler-colour echocardiography was perfomied with the GE-
`Vingmed System Five (GE-Vingrned Ultrasound, Horten, Norway)
`using a multifrequency 2.5-3.5 MHz probe.
`In group A the following echocardiographic and Doppler var-
`iables were analysed:
`. Right and left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic
`areas, measured in the apical four-chamber view.
`a The ratio of ventricular areas (RV to LV areas ratio), calcu-
`lated as the ratio of the right ventricular end-diastolic area
`to the left ventricular end-diastolic area.
`a Right ventricular percent change in area, calculated from the
`right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic area (apical
`four—chamber view) as: RV % change in area = 100 X (RV
`end-diastolic area RV end-systolic area)IRV en

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket