throbber
(‘I
`
`Main Oflice
`1014 Franklin Street
`Suite 206
`Vancouver, Washington
`98660
`Tel: 360.750.9931
`Fax: 360.397.0473
`www.rylanderlaw.com
`
`Practice Areas
`Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights
`nfringement & Unfair Competition
`Government Contract Claims
`Federal Tort Claims
`Commercial Litigation
`Personal Injury
`Criminal Defense
`Federal Regulatory Disputes
`Trials and Appeals
`
`Licensed
`State of Washington
`State of Oregon
`District of Columbia
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`Canadian Patent Office
`
`Member of Bar
`US Supreme Court
`Federal Circuit
`D.C. Circuit
`Court of lntemational Trade
`Court of Federal Claims
`D.C. District Court
`Western District of Washington
`Eastem District of Washington
`Southem District of Maryland
`District of Oregon
`
`Associations
`Am, lntellectual Prop. Law Assn
`Wash. State Patent Law Assn
`Ore. Patent Law Assn
`Assn ofTrial Lawyers of Am.
`Wash. State Trial Lawyer’s Assn
`American Bar Assn
`Sec. Intellectual Properly Law
`Sec. Public Contract Law
`Federal Circuit Bar Assn
`Oregon State Bar Assn
`Sec. Intellectual Property
`Sec. Liligatrrm
`Sec‘. Brrsincnrs Litrgaliun
`Multnomah Bar Assn
`Washington State Bar Assn
`Sec. Litigation
`Sec. Intellectual Property
`Clark County Bar Assn
`Clark Criminal Defense Bar
`District of Columbia Bar Assn
`Federal Board of Contract Appeals
`Bar Assn
`
`.
`
`1
`
`TTAB
`
`
`
`KURT M . RYLANDER
`
`TRIAL & PATENT ATTORNEY AT LAW PC
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`File no. RMV03
`
`BOX TTAB NO FEE
`
`Assistant Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513
`
`RE:
`
`SANDHILL OPPOSITION
`
`Dear Sir or Madam:
`
`Enclosed for filing please find an original, sealed Second Amended Notice of
`Opposition, plus one additional copy. Also enclosed for filing please find an original
`Redacted Public Version of the Second Amended Notice of Opposition, plus one
`additional copy. Additionally, enclosed herein please find a postage-prepaid postcard
`for date stamping and return to this office. Please let me knogv '
`ere is anything I
`can do for you.
`
`Client (w/redacted ersion)
`
`KMR;wf
`Cc:
`
`\lllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`O6-O2-2005
`
`U.S. Patent & TMOfcITM Mail ROD! D1. #77
`
`

`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Do. No. RMVO3
`
`In the matter of trademark application Serial No. 75/789,080
`Filed August 31, 1999
`For the mark SANDHILL
`Class: 33
`
`Published in the Official Gazette at TM 481 on January 8, 2002
`
`RMV CELLARS, LLC
`
`Opposer,
`
`-V_
`
`CALONAWINES LTD
`
`Applicant.
`
`Opposition No. 91151893
`
`REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION OF
`
`DOCUMENT FILED PURSUANT TO
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`1.
`
`RMV CELLARS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company having its
`
`principal place of business at 2830 S. Cornett Drive, Ridgefield, WA 98642, United
`
`States (hereinafter “OpposeI”), believes that it is damaged by registration of the mark
`
`SANDHILL that is the subject of U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 75/789,080
`
`(hereinafter ‘"080 application”) for wines,
`
`in Class 33, by CALONA WINES LTD., a
`
`Canadian corporation having an address at 1125 Richter Street Kelowna, British
`
`Columbia CANADA VIY 2K6 (hereinafter "App|icant").
`
`CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`
`. and two copies of the document to
`I hereby certify that on the date signed below the origi
`'th the United States Postal Service as
`which this certification is attached is being d - a
`- .
`‘ =
`‘ 0 FEE, Assistant Commissioner for
`first class mail in an envelope addresse o 0«
`Trademarks. Trademark Trial and ‘ pe d. 2900
`stal Drive, Arlington. VA 22202-
`
`3513. Date: May 24, 2005 /IRT M RYI ANDF '
`
`SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION"-/-1
`REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION
`
` KURT M. RYLANDER TRIAL AND
`PATENT ATTORNEY AT LAW PC
`1014 FRANKLIN STREET, surre 206
`VANCOUVER. WA 98660
`360.750.9931
`
`

`
`
`
`2.
`
`The ’080 application was filed August 31, 1999, and published for
`
`opposition on January 8, 2002 at TM 481, Official Gazette of the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office. Opposer hereby opposes registration of the SANDHILL mark as
`
`described in the ’080 application.
`
`3.
`
`The Opposition fee was filed with the original Notice of Opposition.
`
`As second grounds for opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`4.
`
`Opposer is
`
`informed and believes and on that basis alleges that
`
`Applicant is not the owner of the ’080 application
`
`5.
`
`[REDACTED]
`
`Notably, the sale transferred to 3905039 Canada, Inc.
`
`the good will of the
`
`business, but did not transfer the trademark SANDHILL and trademark applications
`
`therefore, leaving those assets in the name of Calona Wines Ltd.
`
`6.
`
`Opposer is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that on May 1,
`
`2002, Calona Wines Ltd. changed its name to CANRIM PACKAGING, LTD.
`
`At the
`
`same time, 3905039 Canada,
`
`Inc. changed its name to CALONA WINES LTD.
`
`(hereinafter to avoid confusion, the new Calona Wines Ltd. will be referenced as “New
`
`Calona Wines Ltd.”)
`
`7.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`the trademark SANDHILL and the trademark applications
`
`therefore are owned by Canrim Packaging, Ltd., but the goodwill in such trademarks is
`
`owned by New Calona Wines Ltd.
`
`SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION --2
`REDACTED pUBL|C VERSION
`WW
`
`KURT M- RY‘-ANDER TR'AL AND
`PATENT ATTORNEY AT LAW PC
`1014 FRANKLIN STREET, surrz 206
`VANCOUVER, WA 98660
`360.750.9931
`
`

`
`:15.
`
`l
`
`I
`
`As third, alternative, grounds for opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`8.
`
`Opposer is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that Opposer,
`
`since prior to Applicant’s filing date or any date of first use upon which Applicant can
`
`rely, has used and not abandoned the mark SANDHILL WINERY for wines;
`
`that
`
`Applicant’s mark SANDHILL so resembles Opposer’s previously used mark SANDHILL
`
`WINERY as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods or services of
`
`the Applicant,
`
`to cause confusion, mistake or deception, and thus is not entitled to
`
`registration pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act.
`
`As fifth, alternative, grounds for opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`9.
`
`Based on the foregoing allegations, Applicant has abandoned the ‘O80
`
`Application.
`
`As sixth, alternative, grounds for opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`10.
`
`Based on the foregoing allegations, Applicant has voided its rights to the
`
`mark SANDHILL by violation of the Anti—Assignment in Gross rule.
`
`SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION --3
`REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION
`‘T
`
`KURT M- RY‘-ANDER TRIAL AND
`PATENT ATTORNEY AT LAW PC
`1014 FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 206
`VANCOUVER, WA 98660
`360.750.9931
`
`

`
`I
`
`Y
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that
`
`this opposition is sustained and that
`
`registration to the Applicant is refused.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KURT M. RYLANDER TRI
`
`AND
`
`PATENT ATTO
`
`
`
`101 Franklin Stre t, Suite 206
`
`V ncouver, WA 98
`/, 60) 750-9931
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO APPLICANT
`
`inserted an envelope
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the date signed below I
`containing the document to which this certificate is attached into " U.S. Mails
`first
`r the Applicant, Chuck
`" 2nd Ave, 1600 ODS
`
`
`
`SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF OPPOSITION --4
`REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION
`
`KURT M. RYLANDER TRIAL AND
`PATENT ATTORNEY AT LAW PC
`1014 FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 206
`VANCOUVER, wA 98660
`360.750.9931

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket