throbber
To:
`
`Subject:
`Sent:
`Sent As:
`
`PIERCE(info@rjpiercelaw.com)ROSEZENA
`J.
`ROSEZENA
`PIERCE(info@rjpiercelaw.com)
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90843872 - POUSSEY
`October 11, 2023 12:56:49 PM EDT
`tmng.notices@uspto.gov
`
`J.
`
`Attachments
`
`screencapture-www-collinsdictionary-com-dictionary-english-hand-cream-16969635392321
`screencapture-encyclopedia-thefreedictionary-com-skin-cream-16969636786231
`screencapture-www-collinsdictionary-com-dictionary-english-eye-cream-16969638112581
`screencapture-www-marieclaire-com-beauty-g26766855-best-foot-creams-16969638693851
`screencapture-www-health-harvard-edu-staying-healthy-
`managing_common_vulvar_skin_conditions-16969771914171
`screencapture-www-amazon-com-NeuEve-C2-AE-Vulva-Balm-Cream-Moisturizer-dp-
`B00CHY132G-16969773146961
`screencapture-www-amazon-com-Intimate-Feminine-Irritation-Relieves-Menopause-dp-
`B0071Q5PL0-16969775561701
`screencapture-thehoneypot-co-products-herbal-vulva-cream-16969778759221
`screencapture-whywelikethis-com-best-vulvar-creams-16969784258361
`6593512
`7042117
`7069668
`6882923
`6946047
`screencapture-www-soulsource-com-products-vmagic-intimate-skin-cream-16970420924651
`screencapture-www-manscaped-com-products-crop-cleanser-groin-wash-manscaping-
`16970421343251
`screencapture-www-amazon-com-dp-B0725Y1K2L-16970421878431
`screencapture-www-facebook-com-100057446417938-videos-our-pussie-potion-mist-is-a-
`herbal-infused-mist-1127910910963827-16970423969931
`screencapture-mcbskincare-com-products-untitled-sep6_18-35-16970424715891
`screencapture-www-amazon-com-Vaginal-Instant-Tightening-Shrink-Actress-dp-
`B0CH82Q9F9-16970425704971
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application Serial No.  90843872
`
`Mark:   POUSSEY
`
`Correspondence Address:  
`Rosezena J. Pierce
`R.J. PIERCE LAW GROUP, P.C.
`205 N Michigan Ave
`SUITE 810
`Chicago IL 60601
`UNITED STATES
`
`

`

`Applicant:   Bella Kosmetics Skin & Body Care
`
`Reference/Docket No.  N/A
`
`Correspondence Email Address:   info@rjpiercelaw.com; info@rjpiercelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AFTER FINAL ACTION DENIED
`
`Issue date:   October 11, 2023
`
`Applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.   See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3).  The trademark
`examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request and determined the request did not:  (1)
`raise a new issue, (2) resolve all the outstanding issue(s), (3) provide any new or compelling evidence
`with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or
`shed new light on the outstanding issue(s).  TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  
`
`Accordingly, the following requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action dated June
`6, 2023, are maintained and continued as discussed below: 
`
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`refusal pursuant to Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1); 
`refusal pursuant to Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45;
`refusal pursuant to Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45; and
`requirement for information
`
`
`See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  
`
`REGISTRATION REFUSED UNDER TRADEMARK ACT SECTION 2(e)(1)
`
`Registration is refused because the applied-for mark POUSSEY merely describes the characteristic(s)
`and/or purpose of applicant’s goods.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see
`TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.
`
` A
`
` mark is merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature,
`purpose, or use of an applicant’s goods and/or services.  TMEP §1209.01(b); see, e.g., In re TriVita,
`Inc., 783 F.3d 872, 874, 114 USPQ2d 1574, 1575 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson
`LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1173, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); In re Steelbuilding.com, 415 F.3d
`1293, 1297, 75 USPQ2d 1420, 1421 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Estate of P.D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Comm’r of
`Patents, 252 U.S. 538, 543 (1920)). 
`
` A
`
` novel spelling or an intentional misspelling that is the phonetic equivalent of a merely descriptive
`word or term is also merely descriptive if purchasers would perceive the different spelling as the
`equivalent of the descriptive word or term.  See In re Quik-Print Copy Shop, Inc., 616 F.2d 523, 526 &
`n.9, 205 USPQ 505, 507 & n.9 (C.C.P.A. 1980) (holding “QUIK-PRINT,” phonetic spelling of “quick-
`print,” merely descriptive of printing and photocopying services); In re Calphalon Corp., 122 USPQ2d
`1153, 1163 (TTAB 2017) (holding “SHARPIN”, phonetic spelling of “sharpen,” merely descriptive of
`cutlery knife blocks with built-in sharpeners); In re Carlson, 91 USPQ2d 1198, 1203 (TTAB 2009)
`
`

`

`(holding “URBANHOUZING,” phonetic spelling of “urban” and “housing,” merely descriptive of real
`estate services); TMEP §1209.03(j).
`
`Here, the previously attached dictionary definition from American Heritage Dictionary shows that the
`word “poussey” in the mark is an intentional misspelling and the phonetic equivalent of the word
`“pussy,” which is generally considered to be an offensive and/or slang term for the vagina or vulva. See
`https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=pussy,
`visited
`on
`April
`28,
`2022;
`https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/rawdeod/pussy/0 and  https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199543700.001.0001/acref-
`9780199543700-e-3861?rskey=H2037f&result=3,  visited on December 9, 2022. 
`
`The evidence of record further shows that some lotions, creams, oils and related goods are sometimes
`designed for and used on the genitals, and that wording such as "genitals" and "vulva" are sometimes
`used to describe this feature and/or purpose of such goods, or the type of goods themselves. This
`evidence includes pages from the following Internet sites.
`
`
`VSPOT: https://www.vspotmd.com/products/goodsex
`
`Kindra: https://ourkindra.com/products/the-daily-vaginal-lotion
`
`Soul Source: https://www.soulsource.com/products/vmagic-intimate-skin-cream
`
`Original Swiss Aromatics: https://www.soulsource.com/products/vmagic-intimate-skin-
`cream
`
`Manscaped: https://www.manscaped.com/products/crop-cleanser-groin-wash-manscaping
`
`https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0725Y1K2L?linkCode=ogi&tag=menshealth-
`
`Amazon:
`auto-
`20&ascsubtag=%5Bartid%7C2139.a.19547109%5Bsrc%7C%5Bch%7C%5Blt%7Csale%5Bpid%7Ca707aa48-
`9bc1-4e70-8be7-d1dbcfd9bae9
`
`
`All visited on December 9, 2022. 
`
`The attached third-party registrations show the term "pussy" disclaimed as descriptive when used in
`relation to creams, lotions and related goods. These registrations include the following: 
`
`
`
`ID    Serial    Filed    Status    Mark
`1    97047379    20210927    V ®    THE GOOD PUSSY FEMININE CARE
`2    97331121    20220325    V ®    PUSSIE POTION
`
`3    90798846    20210628    V ®    YUMMIE PUSSY
`4    90265053    20201020    V ®    PUSSY FAIRY
`5    90878183    20210811    V ®    PUSSY EMPOWERED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Third-party registrations featuring goods and/or services the same as or similar to applicant’s goods
`and/or services are probative evidence on the issue of descriptiveness where the relevant word or term
`is disclaimed, registered under Trademark Act Section 2(f) based on acquired distinctiveness, or
`registered on the Supplemental Register. E.g., In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d
`
`

`

`1738, 1745 (TTAB 2016) (quoting Inst. Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. Vintners Int’l Co., 958
`F.2d 1574, 1581-82, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1196 (Fed. Cir. 1992)); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d
`1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006).
`
`The following third-party Internet evidence likewise shows descriptive use of the slang term "pussy" to
`describe a feature of creams, lotions, gels and/or similar goods. 
`
`https://www.facebook.com/100057446417938/videos/our-pussie-potion-mist-is-a-herbal-infused-mist-
`/1127910910963827/
`https://mcbskincare.com/products/untitled-sep6_18-35
`https://www.amazon.com/Vaginal-Instant-Tightening-Shrink-Actress/dp/B0CH82Q9F9
`
`All visited on October 11, 2023. 
`
`The attached evidence also shows similar use of the equivalent word "vulva" and related terms to refer
`to similar preparations and their use. This evidence includes pages from the following websites.
`
`
`
`https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-
`healthy/managing_common_vulvar_skin_conditions
`
`https://www.amazon.com/NeuEve%C2%AE-Vulva-Balm-Cream-
`Moisturizer/dp/B00CHY132G
`
`https://www.amazon.com/Intimate-Feminine-Irritation-Relieves-
`Menopause/dp/B0071Q5PL0
`
`https://thehoneypot.co/products/herbal-vulva-cream
`
`https://whywelikethis.com/best-vulvar-creams/#gsc.tab=0
`
`
`
`All visited on October 10, 2023.
`
`Such usage is comparable to the use of words such as "hand" and "foot" to describe the purpose and
`type of goods. The attached evidence shows use of words like "hand," "skin," "eye," and "foot" to refer
`to types of creams, lotions and other preparations and where they are intended to be applied. This
`evidence includes pages from the following websites.
`
`
`
`https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/hand-cream; 
`
`https://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/skin+cream; 
`
`https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/eye-cream; 
`
`https://www.marieclaire.com/beauty/g26766855/best-foot-creams/.
`
`

`

`
`
`All visited on October 10, 2023.
`
`Appilcant's Goods
`
`Applicant’s specimens indicate that applicant’s goods are for “feminine care” and include a “feminine
`yoni spray.” The previously attached definition shows that the word “yoni” means a representation of a
`vulva. See https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=yoni, visited on April 28, 2022.
`
`The attached pages from applicant's website show that applicant's goods include gels, oils, and related
`goods for use on the skin, including the genitals. This evidence includes the following pages from
`applicant's website. 
`
`
`
`Shower gel:
`
`
`
`https://www.bellakosmetics.com/products/sacred-yoni-shower-gel, ("[o]ur...gel is a must-
`have for your daily feminine care routine. Natural and organic ingredients create balance to
`your Sacred Place's pH levels, helping with vaginal tightness, yeast infections, bacterial
`vaginosis, and other common issues related to your 'V.'");
`
`
`
`https://www.bellakosmetics.com/products/divine-goddess-moringa-yoni-shower-gel,
`("Everyone deserves healthy donis, especially those experiencing a little trouble down
`there. Made from all-natural ingredients like Moringa, Lemon, and Lime essential oils, this
`gentle gel instantly nutures your sacred lady part back to optimal health and
`performance..."); 
`
`
`
`Oil: 
`
`
`
`https://www.bellakosmetics.com/products/divine-goddess-yoni-
`oil?pr_prod_strat=use_description&pr_rec_id=ad81dfb42&pr_rec_pid=7376465232029&pr_ref_pid=7376467361949&pr_seq=uniform,
`("Ladies, are you dealing with dry, sensitive, or painful vaginal issues? Its time to bring
`your Yoni back to life with our ultra-soothing Divine Poussey Oil...this natural herbal
`blend fights odors, helps to restore a healthy and balanced pH, tightens skin, fights bad
`bacteria & yeast, reduce inflammation or irritated skin, and can help hormonal changes
`from periods to menopause...[r]educes vaginal dryness...[s]mooth out tender vaginal
`tissue");
`
`
`
`

`

`Herbal mix for Steam treatment
`
`
`
`https://www.bellakosmetics.com/products/divine-goddess-yoni-
`steam?pr_prod_strat=use_description&pr_rec_id=55cde02a9&pr_rec_pid=7376465133725&pr_ref_pid=7376465232029&pr_seq=uniform,
`("By applying gentle heat and moisture, herbal steam permeates the external vagina and
`carries medicinal plant properties to the tissues, increasing circulation. The plant medicines
`are absorbed into the bloodstream and circulated into the reproductive system where they
`help to stimulate healing. This powerful ritual helps nourish the vagina while healing and
`restoring divine feminity...cleanse the vagina and uterus...regulate menstuation..."]; 
`
`
`
`Scrub
`
`
`
`https://www.bellakosmetics.com/products/hello-sunshine-yoni-
`scrub?pr_prod_strat=use_description&pr_rec_id=55cde02a9&pr_rec_pid=7376466542749&pr_ref_pid=7376465232029&pr_seq=uniform,
`("Show your Yoni some special attention with our Pretty Poussey Feminine Scrub...our
`scrub keeps your Yoni hydrated, tight, and fresh while combating urinary tract infections,
`yeast infections, fatigue, PMS, cramps, ingrown hairs, and more.").
`
`
`
`All visited on December 5, 2022. 
`
`Thus, applicant’s goods are intended for use on or in relation to the vagina or vulva and the word
`“pussy” and its phonetic equivalent(s) merely describe the nature and purpose of applicant’s goods.
`
`Applicant's Argument(s): 
`
`Applicant claims that the wording "poussey" is a double entendre.  October 21, 2022, response, pp. 10
`and 11.  Applicant also claims that the mark is not descriptive because it "has multiple meanings."
`noting that the word that forms the mark can also be used to refer to a cat. October 21, 2022, response,
`p. 11, April 6, 2023, request for reconsideration, p. 10.
`
`However, it is well-established that whether the mark has other meanings in relation to irrelevant goods
`and/or services is not dispositive.  Descriptiveness is considered in relation to the relevant goods and/or
`services. DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1254, 103 USPQ2d
`1753, 1757 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “That a term may have other meanings in different contexts is not
`controlling.” Robinson v. Hot Grabba Leaf, LLC, 2019 USPQ2d 149089, at *5 (TTAB 2019) (citing In
`re Canine Caviar Pet Foods, Inc., 126 USPQ2d 1590, 1598 (TTAB 2018)); TMEP §1209.03(e). “It is
`well settled that so long as any one of the meanings of a term is descriptive, the term may be considered
`to be merely descriptive.” In re Mueller Sports Med., Inc., 126 USPQ2d 1584, 1590 (TTAB 2018)
`(quoting In re Chopper Indus., 222 USPQ 258, 259 (TTAB 1984)).
`
`Applicant acknowledges that "if consumers knew that [the mark] was registered for skincare, it would
`
`

`

`merely suggest that the skincare would be suitable or targeted for the vagina." April 6, 2023, Request
`for reconsideration, p. 10. Nevertheless, applicant also claims that "[c]onsumers would not understand
`[the mark] to mean [the type and purpose of applicant's goods]." October 21, 2022, response, p. 12.
`However, it has long been the law that "[w]hether consumers could guess what the product [or service]
`is from consideration of the mark alone is not the test.” In re Am. Greetings Corp., 226 USPQ 365, 366
`(TTAB 1985). The question is not whether someone presented only with the mark could guess
`what the goods and/or services are, but “whether someone who knows what the goods and[/or]
`services are will understand the mark to convey information about them.” DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v.
`Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1254, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1757 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In
`re Tower Tech, Inc., 64 USPQ2d 1314, 1316-17 (TTAB 2002)); In re Mueller Sports. Med., Inc., 126
`USPQ2d 1584, 1587 (TTAB 2018).
`
`Applicant also claims that the registration of several marks cited by the applicant suggest that
`applicant's mark should be registered. However, the registrations cited by the applicant are for different
`marks and/or different services. Moreover, several of these marks include disclaimers for the word
`"pussy," which is the phonetic equivalent of applicant's mark. These disclaimers demonstrate the
`descriptiveness of the term "pussy" and its phonetic equivalents in relation to applicant's types of goods
`and thereby support the refusal to register. Furthermore, it is not apparent from the application record
`that the evidence of record for the registrations that do not include a disclaimer or Section 2(f) claim
`established that the goods were specifically used for the vulva, as has been established by the evidence
`for this application record. Therefore, these marks have little, if any, probative value on the issue of
`descriptiveness. 
`
`Thus, applicant’s arguments have been considered but are inconsistent with the relevant trademark law
`and evidence of record and are unpersuasive.
`
`Therefore, since the applied-for mark merely describes the applicant’s goods, registration is refused in
`accordance with the Trademark Act.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see
`TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.
`
`Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by
`submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  However, if applicant responds to the
`refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
`
`REGISTRATION REFUSED PURSUANT TO TRADEMARK ACT SECTIONS 1, 2 AND 45
`
`Registration is further refused in the alternative because the applied-for mark POUSSEY is a term that
`does not function as a trademark or service mark to indicate the source of applicant’s goods and to
`identify and distinguish them from others. Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-
`1053, 1127.  In this case, the applied-for mark is a term that is widely used in the marketplace in
`various forms to merely convey information about applicant’s or similar goods and/or services.  See In
`re Boston Beer Co., 198 F.3d 1370, 1372-74, 53 USPQ2d 1056, 1058-59 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (holding
`THE BEST BEER IN AMERICA for beer and ale a common claim of superiority and incapable of
`registration); In re Melville Corp., 228 USPQ 970, 971 (TTAB 1986) (holding BRAND NAMES FOR
`LESS for retail clothing store services a common promotional phrase and incapable of registration);
`TMEP §1202.04(a). 
`
`Slogans and terms that are merely informational in nature, such as statements or laudatory phrases
`about goods and/or services ordinarily used in business or in a particular trade or industry, are not
`
`

`

`registrable.  See In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010).  Determining whether
`the slogan or term functions as a trademark or service mark depends on how it would be perceived by
`the relevant public.  In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1148, 1150 (TTAB 2019) (citing D.C.
`One Wholesaler, Inc. v. Chien, 120 USPQ2d 1710, 1713 (TTAB 2016)); In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96
`USPQ2d at 1229; TMEP §1202.04.  “The more commonly a [slogan or term] is used, the less likely
`that the public will use it to identify only one source and the less likely that it will be recognized by
`purchasers as a trademark [or service mark].”  In re Hulting, 107 USPQ2d 1175, 1177 (TTAB 2013)
`(quoting In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229); TMEP §1202.04(b).
`
`As discussed above, the evidence of record, applicant’s specimens of use and applicant's website all
`show that this term (and equivalent terms) are widely used in the marketplace to indicate that goods are
`used in relation to the vagina and/or vulva.  Because consumers are accustomed to seeing this term used
`in this manner, when it is applied to applicant’s goods, they would perceive it merely as informational
`matter indicating a slang and/or vulgar reference to the body part on, or in relation to which the goods
`are intended to be used. Thus, this term would not be perceived as a mark that distinguishes applicant’s
`goods from those of others and identifies the source of applicant’s goods.
`
`Applicant's Argument(s): 
`
`Applicant acknowledges that "it may be argued that some of [applicant's] products can or are designed
`specifically for the vagina or vulva." October 21, 2022 response, p. 8. 
`
`Nevertheless, applicant claims that the proposed mark is not informational because "[t]he relevant
`consumer is...not a consumer...looking to purchase a vaginal oil, but is a consumer looking to purchase
`skincare." October 21, 2022, response, p. 7. There is no evidence in the record to support this claim.
`Moreover, even if the claim were shown to be true, the fact that consumers consider the relevant goods
`to be part of a broader type of skincare products does not diminish the descriptive significance of the
`mark in relation to the applicant's goods. Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45. 
`
`Applicant acknowledges that the wording '"POUSSEY" may be merely informational where it refers to
`one sole and exclusive good." October 21, 2022, response, p. 9. However, applicant claims that the
`mark is not informational because the wording in the mark "refers to a wide variety of skincare
`products." Id. This claim misstates the legal test governing marks that fail to function as indications of
`source, the application of which is not determined based on whether the mark is informational for all
`the goods and/or services for which registration is sought. Under this test, it is only necessary for the
`mark to be informational in relation to one or more goods or services to support a refusal to register. 
`
`Applicant acknowledges that there is "no immediate association" between its mark and any particular
`goods, but supposes that consumers who encounter the mark in the marketplace would associate it with
`sex toys or several other types of goods. However, there is no evidence to suggest that consumers of
`skin care preparations and related goods who encounter the mark would think of this different category
`and class of goods. 
`
`Applicant has submitted several images of use of the with other wording and has claimed that this use
`establishes that the mark is not informational. However, these images do not show the mark as it
`appears in the mark drawing, as discussed further below. Therefore, these images are of little, if any,
`probative value on the issue of this refusal.
`
`Thus, applicant’s arguments have been considered but are inconsistent with the relevant trademark law
`
`

`

`and evidence of record and are unpersuasive.
`
`An applicant may not overcome this refusal by amending the application to seek registration on
`the Supplemental Register or asserting a claim of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f). 
`TMEP §1202.04(d); see In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d at 1229.  Nor will submitting a substitute
`specimen overcome this refusal.  See TMEP §1202.04(d). 
`
`REGISTRATION REFUSED PURSUANT TO TRADEMARK ACT SECTIONS 1 AND 45
`
`Mark shown on drawing does not match mark on specimen.  Registration is further refused because
`the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce in International Class 3, which
`is required in the application or amendment to allege use.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C.
`§§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).  The mark
`appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a
`substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a)-(b); TMEP
`§807.12(a).
`
`In this case, the specimen displays the mark as "POUSSEY PLEASURE," "PHRESH POUSSEY" and
`"REFRESH THAT POUSSEY."  However, the drawing displays the mark as POUSSEY.  The mark on
`the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because it contains the additional wording
`“pleasure,” “phresh” and/or “represh that.” Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence
`of use of the mark in commerce.  See TMEP §807.12(a).
`
`Applicant has responded to this issue by submitting several substitute specimens that appear to be
`duplicates of the original specimens. Specifically, each consists of an image of a labelled container.
`Like the original specimens, the images show the wording "POUSSEY PLEASURE," "PHRESH
`POUSSEY" and "REFRESH THAT POUSSEY," rather than the mark as it appears in the mark
`drawing, i.e., the word "POUSSEY" alone. Therefore, the mark on the substitute specimens does not
`match the mark in the drawing because it contains the additional wording “pleasure,” “phresh” and/or
`“represh that.” Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in
`commerce.
`
`Response options.  Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following:
`
`Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) for each applicable
`(1)      
`international class that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods
`and/or services in the application or amendment to allege use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce at
`least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use.
`
`Examples of specimens.  Specimens for goods include a photograph of (1) the actual goods bearing
`the mark; (2) an actual container, packaging, tag or label for the goods bearing the mark; or (3) a point-
`of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c);
`TMEP §904.03(a)-(m).  A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must
`show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information
`necessary for ordering the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i); see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c). 
`
`Specimens for services must show a direct association between the mark and the services and include:
`(1) copies of advertising and marketing material, (2) a photograph of business signage or billboards, or
`(3) materials showing the mark in the sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  See 37 C.F.R.
`
`

`

`§2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C). 
`
`Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the
`date it was accessed or printed on the specimen itself, within the TEAS form that submits the specimen,
`or in a verified statement under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 in a later-filed response.  See 37
`C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.03(i), 1301.04(a).
`
`Submit a request to amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) (which includes
`(2)      
`withdrawing an amendment to allege use, if one was filed), as no specimen is required before
`publication.  This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as
`providing a specimen.
`
`The USPTO will not accept an amended drawing submitted in response to this refusal because the
`changes would materially alter the drawing of the mark in the original application or as previously
`acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(a)-(b); TMEP §807.14.  Specifically, the addition of the
`other wording noted above to the mark on the drawing to agree with the mark on the specimen would
`change the sound, appearance, meaning and overall commercial impression of the mark and result in an
`impermissible material alteration.
`
`For more information about drawings and instructions on how to satisfy these response options using
`the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.
`
`Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by
`submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  However, if applicant responds to the
`refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) set forth below.
`
`REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
`
`Applicant did not respond fully and directly to the questions posed in the non-final and final Office
`actions. Therefore, the applicant must respond to the following questions for the application record:
`1.
`What is the meaning and significance of the wording “poussey” in relation to applicant’s goods?
`Do applicant’s goods serve some purpose in relation to the vagina or vulva?
`2.
`a.
`If so, please explain and cite examples of goods that serve this purpose.
`
`
`This information is necessary to evaluate accurately and fully the registrability of the applicant’s
`proposed designation. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.61(b); TMEP §814.  If the applicant does not provide the
`information required herein, registration may be refused.  The Trademark Rules of Practice have the
`effect of law and failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusal of registration. 
`See, e.g., In re Joseph Edward Page, 1999 TTAB LEXIS 229 (TTAB 1999); In re Babies Beat, Inc., 13
`USPQ2d 1729 (TTAB 1990); In re Big Daddy's Lounges, Inc., 200 USPQ 371 (TTAB 1978); In re Air
`Products and Chemicals, Inc., 192 USPQ2d 84, 85-86 (TTAB 1976); and In re Morrison Industries,
`Inc., 178 USPQ 432, 433-34 (TTAB 1973).   
`
`By presenting to the Office any paper, including a response, the practitioner is certifying that all
`statements made therein of the party’s own knowledge are true and are, to the best of the party's
`knowledge, information and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, made
`with the knowledge that any practitioner who knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up
`by any trick, scheme, or material fact, or knowingly and willfully makes any false, fictitious, or
`fraudulent statements or representations, or knowingly and willfully makes or uses any false writing or
`
`

`

`document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be
`subject to the penalties set forth under 18 U.S.C. §1001 and any other applicable criminal statute, and
`violations of the provisions of this section may jeopardize the probative value of the paper.  See 37
`CFR §11.18(b)(2).
`
`
`If applicant has already filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will
`be notified to resume the appeal.   See TMEP §715.04(a).  
`
`If applicant has not filed an appeal and time remains in the response period for the final Office
`action, applicant has the remainder of that time to (1) file another request for reconsideration that
`complies with and/or overcomes any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a
`notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B).
`
`
`/Edward Fennessy/
`Edward Fennessy
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`Law Office 114
`(571) 272-8804
`Edward.Fennessy@USPTO.GOV
`
`
`
`

`

`PAN eeNels
`
`aanWaukee
`
`GAMES
`
`SCHOOLS
`
`i=]@JE)
`
`RESOURCES
`
`Sites
`
`English
`
`French | German |
`
`Italian | Spanish | Portuguese
`
`| Hindi
`
`Word Lists
`
`| Grammar?
`
`Conjugations sentyle- ATeloe
`
`leila 4
`
`| Morew Meeelalag | Thesaurus
`
` (heend kri:m @ )
`
`Ye}vat]
`
`aeeeee
`
`English Dictionary
`
`Sentences
`
`Grammar
`
`Definition of 'hand cream'
`hand cream
`in British English
`
`@
`
`NOUN
`a cream that van nit an uatr hands ta make tham feel caftar and cmnanther
`
`& Wordle Helper
`
`Ss ecscaees
`
`Quick Word Challenge
`Question: 1
`- Score:0/5
`
`

`

`———
`CRE UE Py ee Oe Ge Ure Gee arrears
`
`| Collins English Dictionary. Capyright©HarperCollinsPublishers
` Payyxlia)
`
`Drag the correct answerinto the
`lelona
`
`Examples of ‘hand cream' in a sentence
`
`hand cream
`
`A hand cream that doubles up as face moisturiser, shaving cream andhair gel.
`THE SUN (2014)
`
`Investin a couple ofhandylip salves to keep in your bag and at home, and regularlymoisturise your mitts with
`a good hand cream.
`THE SUN (2014)
`
`AMARee
`
`This effective cleansing cream also makes a superb hand cream.
`Guyton, ANITA THE NATURAL BEAUTY...
`
`To keep them soft and supple invest in a good hand cream.
`THE SUN(2010)
`
`
`Adventure on
`the edge.
`
`fee
`
`Example sentencesfrom the Collins Corpus
`& These examples have been automatically selected and may contain sensitive content thatdoes notreflect the opinions orpolicies of
`Collins, or itsparent company HarperCollins.
`We welcome feedback: reportan example sentence ta the Collins team. Read moi
`
`parcel/ package / packet
`
`More! ‘EBabvenrune
`
`‘buyatoyeta.com
`
`Toyota® Offers
`eBrochures, 360 Degree
`Viewsof the Interior,
`Vehicle Comparisons, &
`
`Your Local Toyota Dealer
`
`Learn More >
`
`

`

`4
`
`a
`
`arian OUI FA
`Confusables
`
`a
`
`Language Lover's
`Blog
`
`eeOeSSe You mayalso like
`What's the difference
`betweenparcel,
`package and packet?
`This week we are looking at some
`words which may be confused by
`learners of English: parcel,
`package and packet. Improve your
`English with Collins.
`OCTOBER 9, 2023
`READ MORE
`
` Try Prime 30 days free >
`
`Definition of hand cream from the Collins English Dictionary
`
`b Read aboutthe team of authors
`
`
`English
`
`Sentences
`
`Grammar
`
`hand cream
`
`
`hand brace
`
`hand controls
`hand cream
`hand down
` |
`handembroidery
`
`All ENGLISH wordsthatbegin with 'H’
`
`Source
`
`BOaArteee ieee
`
`QuickWord Challenge __—g
`Grammar
`Sentences
`
`
`
`« New from Collins «
`
`

`

`Drag the correct answerinto the box.
`
`VW I U oO Ll U I I I u
`
`Oct 10, 2023
`
`Word of the day
`biostrome
`a rock layer consisting of a deposit of organic
`
`double bed|clothes horse UteldeSole Toa fel
`
` Me biel atnita
`
`LOLEIRa)iby
`
`SEE FULL DEFINITION
`
`@o0000o
`
`2023 TOYOTA4RUNNERISONE OFTHETOP 10 cars Wile
`
`
`
`EnglishDictionary|
`
`Grammar
`Sentences
`oweworn
`
`PEaay
`Gavvenruae
`
`_
`
`:
`ioaihine:
`
`Official Toyota® 2023 4Runner
`
`O
`
`Contact Us
`
`Ox@
`
`@® This page in
`
`Browseall o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket