throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1119891
`
`Filing date:
`
`03/11/2021
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`Applicant
`
`88877980
`
`Live Good Inc
`
`Applied for Mark
`
`GENRESTORE
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`REINE ROONEY
`REINE ROONEY LLC
`9565 MUNSON HILL ROAD
`BRADFORD, NY 14815
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: reine.glanz@gmail.com
`Secondary Email(s): reine.glanz@gmail.com
`9173347043
`
`Submission
`
`Attachments
`
`Appeal Brief
`
`GENRESTORE_Appeal Brief.pdf(125489 bytes )
`Exhibit A.pdf(1461548 bytes )
`Exhibit B_Redacted.pdf(2744311 bytes )
`
`Appealed class
`
`Class 005. First Use: 2018/10/22 First Use In Commerce: 2018/10/22
`All goods and services in the class are appealed, namely: Dietary supplements
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Reine Rooney
`
`reine.glanz@gmail.com
`
`/Reine Rooney/
`
`03/11/2021
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (TTAB)
`
`
`
`Applicant
`
`Serial No.
`
`Filed
`
`Mark
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`Live Good Inc
`
`88877980
`
`
`
`Examiner: MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
`
`April 19, 2020
`
`Law Office: 115
`
`GENRESTORE
`
`
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`APPLICANT'S APPEAL BRIEF
`
`In response to the Final Office Action dated February 13, 2021, and further in view of the
`
`Notice of Appeal filed March 11, 2021. Applicant respectfully submits the following remarks.
`
`I.
`
`Summary of the Rejections
`
`In the Final Office Action, the Applicant’s application is rejected under Trademark Act
`
`Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d) for being confusingly similar to U.S. Trademark Registration
`
`No. 5565178 for RESTOREGEN (hereinafter the “Registered Mark”).
`
`Applicant respectfully disagrees with the Examiner’s rejection based on a likelihood of
`
`confusion based on the prior registered mark.
`
`II.
`
`The Marks At Issue
`
`The Applied for Mark, GENRESTORE, designates dietary supplements.
`
`The Registered Mark, RESTOREGEN, designates dietary supplements; natural dietary
`
`supplements for the treatment of substance and non-substance behavior cravings; natural dietary
`
`supplements for the treatment of pro-dopamine regulator.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`III. There is No Likelihood of Confusion Between the Marks
`
`Applicant respectfully contends that the Applied for Mark does not have any resemblance
`
`in sound, appearance, meaning, or commercial impression to the Registered Mark.
`
`Nor is registration of Applicant's mark likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to
`
`deceive. An examination of the relevant factors under TMEP §1207 and In re E.I. du Pont de
`
`Nemours & Co., 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973), warrants the conclusion that Applicant's
`
`Mark cannot be said to so resemble the Cited Mark that it is likely to cause confusion, or to cause
`
`mistake,
`
`A. The Marks have Different Meanings and Commercial Impressions
`
`The Examiner argues that the marks are similar in appearance, sound, connotation, and
`
`commercial impression. The undersigned respectfully disagrees. While both marks contain the
`
`elements “GEN” and “RESTORE,” the elements appear in a separate order. That is,
`
`GENRESTORE contains the “GEN” element first, with the “RESTORE” element second; while
`
`RESTOREGEN contains the “RESTORE” element first with the “GEN” element second. For this
`
`reason, the undersigned submits that the marks have a distinct appearance, sound, connotation, and
`
`commercial impression.
`
`The Cited Mark refers to restoring (restore) a genetic (gen) response to prevent addictive
`
`behavior by treating pro-dopamine regulators.
`
`The Applicant’s mark refers to generation (gen) and restore.
`
`Applicant submits that the Registered Mark “creates a vastly different commercial
`
`impression than that of Applicant’s mark.” “[T]he reversal in one mark of the essential elements
`
`of another mark may serve as a basis for a finding of no likelihood of confusion only if the
`
`transposed marks create distinctly different commercial impressions.” In re Nationwide Indus.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1882, 1884 (TTAB 1988), (emphasis added). See also Bank of Am. Nat’l Trust
`
`and Sav. Assn. v. Am. Nat’l Bank of St. Joseph, 201 USPQ 842, 845 (TTAB 1978), and cases
`
`cited therein. Cases on point include In re Mavest, Inc., 130 USPQ 40 (TTAB 1961) (finding no
`
`likelihood of confusion between the marks TOWN SQUIRES and SQUIRETOWN because
`
`transposition of words creates distinctly different commercial impressions); and In re Akzona Inc.,
`
`219 USPQ 94 (TTAB 1983) (finding no likelihood of confusion between SILKY TOUCH for
`
`synthetic yarns and TOUCH O’ SILK for men’s dress shirts, sport shirts, and pajamas because of
`
`different commercial impressions).
`
`As such since the commercial impressions of Applicant’s mark and the Registered Mark
`
`are different, the marks are not similar when compared in their entireties.
`
`B. The Registered Mark is Weak
`
` “In determining the strength of a mark, we consider both its inherent strength based on the
`
`nature of the mark itself and its commercial strength, based on the marketplace recognition value
`
`of the mark.” American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities Inc. v. Child Health Research Inst.,
`
`101 USPQ2d 1022, 1028 (TTAB 2011 (citing Tea Board of India v. Republic of Tea Inc., 80
`
`USPQ2d 1881, 1899 (TTAB 2006) and McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 11:83
`
`(4th ed. 2011) (“The first enquiry focuses on the inherent potential of the term at the time of its
`
`first use. The second evaluates the actual customer recognition value of the mark at the time
`
`registration is sought or at the time the mark is asserted in litigation to prevent another's use.”)).
`
`“[T]he strength of a mark is not a binary factor” and “varies along a spectrum from very strong to
`
`very 3 See January 8, 2016 Office Action pp. 5-13. Serial Nos. 86759729 - 7 - weak.” Juice
`
`Generation, Inc. v. GS Enters. LLC, 794 F.3d 1334, 115 USPQ2d 1671, 1675-76 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`(internal citations omitted). “The weaker [the Registrant’s] mark, the closer an applicant’s mark
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`can come without causing a likelihood of confusion and thereby invading what amounts to its
`
`comparatively narrower range of protection.” Id. at 1676 (internal citations omitted). See also Palm
`
`Bay, 73 USPQ2d at 1693 (“Evidence of third-party use of similar marks on similar goods is
`
`relevant to show that a mark is relatively weak and entitled to only a narrow scope of protection.”).
`
`Applicant submits that “the Register abounds with marks beginning with the word
`
`RESTORE (221) for Class 005 goods. As such, the Registered Mark RESTOREGEN is weak for
`
`Registrant’s identified goods. A search of the Trademark Office database shows 98 marks
`
`commencing with the word “RESTORE” in International Class 003 and 95 third-party marks
`
`containing the word “GEN” in International Class 003. Evidence of extensive registration and use
`
`by others of a term on the same or very similar services can be “powerful” evidence of weakness.
`
`See Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA v. New Millennium Sports,
`
`S.L.U., 797 F.3d 1363, 116 USPQ2d 1129, 1136 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Juice Generation, 115 USPQ2d
`
`at 1674. Active third-party registrations may also be relevant to show that a mark or 4 See April
`
`2, 2016 Office Action Response pp. 14-19. 5 See June 8, 2016 Request for Reconsideration pp. 2-
`
`16. Serial Nos. 86759729 - 8 - a portion of a mark is descriptive, suggestive, or so commonly used
`
`in a particular industry that the public will look to other elements to distinguish the source of the
`
`services. See Juice Generation, 115 USPQ2d at 1674-75. See also Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics,
`
`Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ 693, 694-95 (CCPA 1976); In re J.M. Originals Inc., 6 USPQ2d
`
`1393, 1394 (TTAB 1987); United Foods Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 4 USPQ2d 1172, 1174 (TTAB
`
`1987).
`
`Furthermore, based on the dictionary definition of “restore” (to bring back into existence,
`
`use, or the like; reestablish: to restore order: to bring back to a former, original, or normal
`
`condition, as a building, statue, or painting See https://www.dictionary.com/browse/restore)
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`“Restore” is highly descriptive of the goods. When coupled with the adjective “gen”, the
`
`result is a compound word mark that is highly suggestive. See, e.g., Drackett Co. v. H. Kohnstamm
`
`& Co., 404 F.2d 1399, 160 USPQ 407, 408 (CCPA 1969) (“Although ENDUST may not be
`
`descriptive in the sense that the product actually ends dust or dusting, the mark is suggestive.”).
`
`“Marks that are descriptive or highly suggestive are entitled to a narrower scope of protection, i.e.,
`
`are less likely to generate confusion over source identification, than their more fanciful
`
`counterparts.” Juice Generation, 115 USPQ2d at 1675. See also Drackett Co. v. H. Kohnstamm &
`
`Co., 160 USPQ at 408 (“The scope of protection afforded such highly suggestive marks is
`
`necessarily narrow and confusion is not likely to result from the use of two marks carrying the
`
`same suggestion as to the use of closely similar goods.”). Because the Registered Mark is highly
`
`suggestive and therefore conceptually weak, this du Pont factor weighs against finding a likelihood
`
`of confusion.
`
`C. The Goods are Unrelated and the Degree of Care Exercised by Consumers of The
`
`Applicant’s Goods and the Goods Offered by Registrant is Heightened
`
`Given the commercial reality of the goods at issue, it is not just unlikely, but almost
`
`inconceivable that the respective relevant consumers would mistakenly believe that the parties'
`
`goods originate from the same source or that a connection or sponsorship exists when faced with
`
`the Registered Mark versus Applicant's Mark.
`
`The Registered Mark designates the following goods: “Dietary supplements; natural dietary
`
`supplements for the treatment of substance and non-substance behavior cravings; natural dietary
`
`supplements for the treatment of pro-dopamine regulator.” The Registered Mark’s goods are
`
`marketed as a “patented neuro-nutrient formulation,” “innovative approach to precision addiction
`
`management,” “specific formulation matched to individual genetics,” and “pro-dopamine
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`regulator decreases addictive behavior cravings.” See Exhibit A. This product works as a pro-
`
`dopamine regulator that decreases substance and non-substance craving behaviors. The
`
`formulation includes neuro-nutrient technology in re-balancing brain chemistry and optimizing
`
`dopamine sensitivity and function. To obtain this medicine, a consumer needs to go through an
`
`authorized provider and needs to have their cheek swabbed to determine the correct formulation,
`
`where a specific formulation is matched to individual genetics. This means that a consumer cannot
`
`merely purchase the supplement “off the shelf.” Because of the level of involvement the consumer
`
`must partake, they would be very discerning and aware of the product they are purchasing.
`
`The Applied for Mark designates “Dietary supplements.” Attached as Exhibit B are
`
`examples of the types of supplements the Applicant sells under the GENRESTORE mark. Rather
`
`than being a specific formula that rebalances brain chemistry and optimizes dopamine sensitivity
`
`and function that is customized to the consumer (such as those offered in connection with the
`
`Registered Mark), the Applicant’s supplements are directed to overall health and wellness,
`
`including: collagen, antioxidants, sleep aids, cholesterol reducers, weight loss, and blood sugar
`
`reducers. These types of supplements are very distinct from the Registered Mark’s goods. For
`
`one, they are not formulated to address addiction management nor are the specific formulations
`
`matched to individual genetics. Rather, the Applied for Mark’s goods are meant to address general
`
`health concerns such as cholesterol, sleep problems, and weight loss (to name a few).
`
`In determining whether the parties' goods are so related that a likelihood of confusion will
`
`result from registration of the practicalities of the commercial world should be guiding.
`
`Consumers seeking to utilize the Applicant's Goods exercise great care when choosing a
`
`supplement. As such, consumers are likely to research their options and generally do not make an
`
`impulse purchase when it comes to supplements that they plant to consume.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Therefore, the level of care necessary here significantly minimizes any potential for a
`
`likelihood of confusion. See, e.g., In re NA.D., Inc., 754 F.2d 996, 999-1000, 224 U.S.P.Q.
`
`969,971 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (no likelihood of confusion between NARCO and NARKOMED because
`
`only sophisticated purchasers exercising great care would purchase the relevant goods). In finding
`
`no likelihood of confusion between NARCO for use with rental and leasing of hospital and surgical
`
`equipment and consultation services relating to the operation of such equipment and NARKOMED
`
`for use with anesthesia machines for use in surgery, the Federal Circuit held that “[a]n alert
`
`purchaser could readily distinguish them”. Id. at 999.
`
`D. Applicant’s Mark Includes a Coined Term and the Registered Mark Includes Familiar
`
`Terms
`
`Applicant’s Mark includes a coined term “GENRESTORE” without a readily understood
`
`meaning. Coined terms, i.e., terms that are not familiar to consumers, are typically held to a higher
`
`standard as something already known is distinguishable from the unfamiliar or coined. See In re
`
`General Electric Co., 134 U.S.P.Q. 190, 192 (C.C.P.A. 1962).
`
`On numerous occasions, the C.C.P.A. and T.T.A.B. have held that consumers can easily
`
`differentiate between terms that are known and terms that are unfamiliar. For example, in In re
`
`General Electric Co., the Court found consumers would easily differentiate between VULCAN
`
`and VULKENE for identical goods because they would recognize VULCAN as something already
`
`known, while VULKENE is a coined word. 134 U.S.P.Q. at 192. Similarly, in Faberge, Inc. v.
`
`Dr. Babor GmbH & Co., 219 U.S.P.Q. 848, 851 (T.T.A.B. 1983), the Board found no likelihood
`
`of confusion between BABOR and BABE, both for cosmetic products, and stated:
`
`we note that in a number of cases, the familiar versus unfamiliar
`comparison was made and while it may not have been the only factor
`which influenced those decisions, it was found to be highly significant
`in reaching the decision that confusion was unlikely to occur. The logic
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`behind the decisions is clear. One recognizes instantly that which is
`familiar. Conversely, that which is unfamiliar would be given closer
`scrutiny and in this way could be distinguished from the familiar.
`
`The fact that GENRESTORE is a coined or suggestive term finds in favor of not finding a
`
`likelihood of confusion.
`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`For all the foregoing reasons, Applicant respectfully requests that the Board find that
`
`GENRESTORE. when used in connection with the Applicant’s goods, is not likely to cause
`
`consumer confusion with the Registered Mark and pass the Application to publication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 11, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Attorney for Applicant
`
`By: /Reine Rooney/
`Reine Rooney
`Reine.glanz@gmail.com
`917-334-7043
`
`8
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`j“G E N E u s —
`(
`
`CONSUMER
`6708.94
`743940
`
`
`
`REGISTER
`492(0;94 
`
`About v
`Science v
`GARS® v
`restoreGen® v
`Diagnostics MyGenx®
`*<!= 0,#, = 2*40> = '! 2> = 3#/!'#,' .?2@>
`U.S. Provide s
`Clinical Store
`8A0A !)#' 6&##,&0! 
`
`6:((6*:0;749 
`
`74;*:
`
`
`
`ontrolS
`ton
`and Non—S
`ton
`         
`roving Now
`   
`
`- Patented Neuro-Nutrient Fo mulations
` !" #$!%&#!'
`
`- Innovative Approach to Precision Addiction Management
`(!)#)*++ !,-! ,#'#!*#,#!./%
`
`- Specific Formulation Matched to Individual Genetics
`0+,#1#,$! %&#!.,-!(#)#&2#,'
`
`- Pro-Dopamine Regulator Decreases Addictive Behavior Cravings
` !"3!+%#4/&! 3, ''*#,#)5-)#! 6 )#/'
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`j“G E N E u s —
`(
`     
`
` 
  
` 
`    
`   
   
`  
`  
`
` 

` 
`  
`  
` 

`  
` 
`

`About v
`Science v
`GARS® v
`restoreGen® v
`Diagnostics MyGenx®
`1 B :  B 16: B     B >
`  = C
` 
`  
` 
`

` 
`U.S. Providers
`Clinical Store
`<:A
 9  
`: 
` !"#$"%& $'())*+$!,&$'())*-./0
`
`CONSUMER
`97;:<=86
`76>86:
`
`REGISTER
`68:@86 
`
`
`
`9?;91?:@768 
`
`A76@1?
`
`
`
`
`
`' rES‘tO reG e [’1
`I
`'
`d
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`An unprecedented 41 published clinical studies
`1  

23  
  
`

`have validated this neuro-nutrient technology for
`
` 
`

`
      
`re-balancing brain chemistry and optimizing
` 
`
` 
`    
`
  4 
`dopamine sensitivity and function to help with:
`

`     
`
      5
`
`.
`
`. Reducing addictive cravings
`6
 
`
  
` 
`. Optimizing brain health
`7  4 
` 
` 
`Increasing focus
`
`  
`. Enhancing energy levels
`8
`     
`. Relieving stress
`6    
`Improving overall well-being
`  
`  
`
`.
`
`Control Substance and Non-Substance
`9 : 
` 
`
;: 
` 
`Cravings Now
`9
` ;
`RestoreGen Relapse Controls Relapse
`.
`Rate [N] (9/9)
`
`Rate (N) (96)
`
`Reference
`
`Experimental
`.
`Length of time
`
`Patient Category
`
`6 * “.m-
`
`15m:
`
`was)
`
`lemma-
`
`—_——._
`_—-lE-_—
`
`Avera- nos
`References
`
`6   
`
`130(1433
`91.4 18.29
`
`117(41-7)
`158
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`  
`
 
` 
` 
`
` 
`    
`
` 
`  
 !" 
`#$% & '   $(()*+,)
`
`( -  .
`$  '+

`$ $ / ((0.12 3 4 
`5
`
`6

`-
  6
`' 78
` 9    
`
` 
`
`>?G"> 
`&: G%>
`
`: ;:  
`
` 
 < 
` = 2=#%< 2 

`> 8 2 %? 
`
 @ $
` &
`%& 
`:>G
`
` (0A*/,5  (B  0 (*C*);(*),+*ABA;D0(B
`
`* ?
`E  7
`  
`'$
 
` #
`  
`  #    
` 
`
 &
`"  
 <  2 %F
` 
`&2 &72G":> 
`':"72
`G  
` <  

`> > 7 4 4  F %
G - %
`$  #
`& !' 
" 7
`
`"  (DD0(+DD
`
`D >  
`
` 
`
` 
` ((04+    $
`7

`+7 "  / 77"51
   :

`  
` 7  
`" 

`'$
7
`
`' G %
`% 7

` 2&&
`G
` GFG
`G 

`7#    % %
`F # %
`F / -5   %  /'5 
`
`
`
`7#ƒ G 
` ƒ ?7G„ ƒ ?
`„ ƒ  $
`  % ?
`9„
`
`'
`/'5"
-&
`
`7  < 

`$2< % $ 7%  $
`>  

`

%   
`
`? 
`
`
`G #
`%% 
`: +

`#
   
`
`

` '   $/
# (0(5
`
` G '  &
`  G
`
`B G
` 

`/G?,,*C5"%7
`7

`+7 >
`F 
` 
` #  
`    
 7 7G#    
` G
`
/G5
`
`
 &
`"  - 
` < %F
` 
G - % 
`.'
`% %
`$  = <  2 7 4 4  F % ! 

`>  "
`
`7 
`
`G 
` (/*5*(+*,
`
`A  
` 
`
` $
` #  #
`$
`
`
`    
 " 
`#$%&&F< &" D,()+(**
`
`) &
`   
`=> 
`'
` "%
`

`
`
`$ $
`
`
`+ #
`(+   
 &? &
`"-?  +G
`G
`
`
`-%<  

`> 2 !" 
`#$%& &
`"    B,/05CC)
`
`,  7+$7  
`" 

`:
G /7":G5   =
` 
`G     ; $   G
` G
  

`>? 
`"

`
`
`: +

`% $
`%  $
`%7 8 2 %
 @< 2?%G   G
` (0B/5*A+DB
`
`HIJKLMNOLPQJR
`
`S T
`
`UPKSVWISXINYQI
`ZP[LO\]
`
`^_`a`bcde`feghcd`ciijkl`
`m" F
`$ ((0@


   
`
`n
`9 
   
`
`
` $$ 
` 7#  
`$
`o
`
`pq`a`rebcde`ijcstufei`vjlw`ctgjelx`cti`yz{|`vjlw`tjswlbc}ef`
`m7 F
`$ ((0@

`
 
`$
$
`
`
`    
#
`
`D  
`$ ((0@   
`# 
A

`
` ((0@+ 
`
`
`
.
`$o
`
`~^`a`rebcde`ijcstufei`vjlw`|€|`cti`fhflctke`chfe`vjlw`tjswlbc}ef`
`m7 #*F F
`$ ((0@  
`$ 

` 


`  
`$
`$ <  
 ‚o
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`  
`


` 
 
`
` !"#$$%&'()*+,!(-,(!!,)*.+,.
`kj?'V>jk 
`gWhViNjk
`
`WkXjkV
`,/0
`
`12 3345 6 47
`8
` 6

` 9

`':;!-' "#$$%&.<..**((('.(+,,',
` *.*!/(+(/=>?,@,,'(A!,/</,/0
`m<o V++ o ?mkVp o ..?p o X!+ N/?)p
`
`gl'h'gmlV>Wkj 
`
`nWk>ml
`
`i=V=n.A,. g(+(V.
`B 3C45 6 4D7

` 
E 4  
 6
 8
` 1FGF
`#,(!!. !"#$$%&',.!!..!!*.,+
`<.(<.-A<+((/.(,/-. !./+.,@--H0
`
`2I JK458
`  7
`
7 LM 9 
6
 EE
6 9 
`>N.+$%OP-'<! "#$$%&Q"#$$%&RS,-. ,.(/T+ (/.='+'
`(( -(,=U-A.S.(+((/S-- .(=>..(<-',,
`(,*=',,,<.*..*<(/!</**!,.,!
`,.+.(=V+ !"#$$%&N.+/*.(.(*-/(/A,.+((/+!,=
`V*++((/S'(A!'A(-/< ,,+*S'+,-'(.
`*.((/ ,-.,/(/='(/T.*.(/QR(-/<.!!(.,
`+,S<.+((/N.+'(!'-,S.',/(*!*
`.--/?WX='(((/*,*='+.,.,/-**,='./.(*
`-/.S'+.*S,A+,*(/-.,.-/<
`
`,!.(.((/,,!./(!=N/+*! ((,((-
`(!(,/<+ ,..=U**(/'.*.'.-.,.,+, ,
`,(A!!..<+' !<.(!-='*.@"#$$%;*.,.-
`+,.='(.!-( .Y(A.='!.('("#$$%&,/,+..
`.*<(.<(+!/(0
`
`IF Z[45
ED 
8
` 
64
D7  7
`X.!..,/S'(T<.+AS.<(!-.\%,
`-.!.]^,,*,='(//!*.A,(!(/,,,/
`((,(*!.(/*.A,=')*.+,+(!+(.,=N*.A'
`(!.('-!!A.,!..,,/_-. S-+-+*(,-(!+.
`.!/S+.,A-. S+.,+,(@ !S-+(..*.* ,=
`N;!(/S'((<,+(!0
`
`GF `[45D8
` 
` Fab 

6
`4D76
 7 
`'A< "#$$%&.<.- -,'(+(..A./,/-. ,
`+<(/'A.AS!(/+,,;!(//A.((+.A!.-/,-(
`0
`
`cd C[45
94   7    e
` 

`'A< !V<)(*.+A./.<f<..'(A./,,
`-, ((/(=',,.(*,.!,(+(<'.<.+((!/,+.- /
`,@(,*,+.+@-+',,='-!A"#$$%&,.,/ !
`"#$$%&((/*( ((/(-.!='(+(,-,.( "#$$%&@.+(H0
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`  
` 


` 




`   

`vuK7ECuv 
`@fWEt>uv
`
`fvAuvE
` !"#$%&'&&(()#&*+,,-. /0"&)$1()#(23#$%&'&&(/&$4'&""&5'46)37(140$"&87
`#$%&()60&5619/%&5 0!"81/&:/&"%&:8/&5!0&5:619!"6%6)4:$(5$#6;#&/:'$"&6(&:&%& $ &0)<56 &/&()
`@?7W7@?ECfvu 
`LfvC?
`6(=6(5)2#$)$()6<5&9/&""$()"#$55(& /1&"&%&/$4&$/"$;3>426 &?@#$"$" !(5$;/&$)&/"&("&
`:);&)#&/(&"":$(57#$%&()60&5"!')&"6;(" 1/&:$""&/)6%&(&"":2#60#72&01&<&"9&06$426)#!/
`5$!;#)&/8>@37()!/(8>@8!/4!(;&")26)#165AA#$""#2(&B!6%$&() !(0)6($619/%&1&()")2#$)
`'!)w E06&(0& w KvEx w /&")/&K&(x w A6$;(")60" >4K&(Mx
`"#&#$"#$5(@(0&/)$3C#&;/&$)&")0#$(;&8)#!;#8#$"'&&(6(!/$59)&55$!;#)&/8D@3E#&((;&/#$"
`t3E3L/%65&/" @6(60$E)/&
` 50/$%6(;"F2#60#6"(&$/16/$0!!"G$""#&6"B!6)&'&"&$)H3H &&)I,H-9!(5"<$(5"#&0$((256/&0)
`#&/$99&)6)&/$)#&/)#$('&)#&%60)61 6)3J&/)#!;#)"$/&$"1!0#&"":)/!'&5:$(5'!"4$(5"#&#$"
`'&01&&"":5&9&(5&():$(51/&!)2$/5< 0!"&53J&/9"40#;6")$(5KL$/&$"619/&""&526)#*+,,-.
`$(5#$%&$;/&&5)#5 ()#&$()6<5&9/&""$()")#&4#$5'&&(0("65&/6(;37"&("&)#$)#&/&M$19&1$4
`"&/%&$"$(&(0!/$;&1&()))#&/")5)#&"$1&3(42$487N!"))#!;#));6%&4!!/0&0)6%& 6/")<#$(5
`$00!()"O
`
`PP QR
`S
 T 
`  U 
`V#6&6)6"#$/5)'&6&%&2#&(&%&/7#$%&$")/&"" !%&/$57 !(5)#$)2#&(7)$=&*+,,-.)#&")/&""6"
`;(&$ )&/$'!)(&#!/3W27=&&9*+,,-.6(1490=&)$)2/=O
`
`PX YY
`S


` T     
`Z1$[6(;\]()#& 6 )#5$4 )$=6(;*+,,-.72=&!96('&5$(5"#!)&5!)^_7)]";(&\]14#!"'$(5$"=&5
`_2#$)6";(&`]_>40/$%6(;"8140/$%6(;"\Z
`
` Qa
`S
` b
`
 

 cc 

`C$=6(;*+,,-. /$(!1'&/ 1()#")#6(=6(;)#$)72$" 6(&$(5)#&(5&065&5)")9)$=6(;6)3E(7
`56"0%&/&5)#$)14$(M6&)6&"#$5/&)!/(&5^$(57 6;!/&5!))#$))#&96#&9&5/&5!0&514")/&"""(27")$4
`(*+,,-.O
`
`d Qe
`S   
` b
`
 
`f>K\72$()))#$(=A/3+!1 /)#6"$1$[6(;9/5!0)^7)#$""$%&5146 &\O
`
`gh  
`
i  
U 

`b
`

`
`j/*+,,-.<7$1 &&6(;'&))&/%&/$F(=(&&9$6($)$\G$ )&/(4(&5$43k&"87#$%& &)0$1$5$43
`]V2]6"$70$("$4\O
`
`lP Q
`S   
` 

` b
` 
Um 
 i Xndo
`Z )&/72$")$=&( V&'!)/6(p?87'&;$()$=6(;*+,,-.37($'!)(&1()#7#$5$9/ !(5/&"9("&)
`*+,,-.2#6&71$6()$6(&5(E!'M(&37 &)"6;(6 60$()4'&))&/8"9&06 60$4q7#$%&$(6(0/&$"&6(&(&/;48$
`5&0/&$"&6(0/$%6(;"$(5%&/$'&))&/1537 6(514"& 0!))6(; /6"=4 /6&(5"8$(5&%&(0#$(;&5145&$5<
`&(5N'3"87&(/&56(0&;&37)"&&1")#$)146("6;#)8N!5;&1&()$(51)6%$)6(/&$4619/%&53C#&/&6"
`619/%&1&()6(1415$(5&%&(1652&6;#)""3C#&1")$1$[6(;)#6(;6")#$)7#$%&[&/0/$%6(;"$(5$
`"&("& (/1$04() &)()#&E!'M(&$(&3Z
`
`go rs
`S   i  U
` 
mi   

 b 

`f%&/<)61&7#$%&)/6&5)26)#5/$2 /114$()6<5&9/&""$()1&560$)6(@41'$)$80$!"6(;"&%&/&($!"&$8
`%&/)6;86()&("&$(M6&)48"!(9&$"$())#$)70!5&(5!/&)#&"&"419)1" /(4$5$4'& /&5&0656(;)
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`   
` 

       
`    
`
   
`
`

`    
   
 
 !      
`
`   
`dln\ld 
`ij\kMld
`
`idZld\
`  
` 

` 

 
` 
`
  
`          
  "
`   # 
`            
`
`     $
`mj[m\idl 
`
`cid[m
`
`%&'()*+,-'.+/0012(1'3+451312163*+'3+7899:;+
`[ o \  o n[d\p o   n p o Z   Mn hp
`
`k\c  
`
`\ 
`<63=6+>)5.63?+<@A+B6.15=+<)01213)+451312?+C65).?+D-)E'3
`F   G      
`  
`       $
`
`H=5)+B-1)0?+</4A+CI'-)*+J-)6(.)3(+630+K)2'L)-=+4)3()-?+B5'-106+
`FM 
`    
` 
`    

   
`
`  
`
`"  M 
`     
`
` 
  
` 
`  
` #
`       N
`
`<6-O+C+P'50?+<@+QR-',)**'-+).)-1(&*?+S31L)-*1(=+',+B5'-106+@)R6-(.)3(+',+T*=2I16(-=+4'55)E)+',+<)01213)
`QP613)*L155)+
`F     #
`     
#

         
`     
 
`      
     

`  $
`
`U'I3+P1'-063'?+@>H+630+</4+Q+U'I3+P1'-063'+H1,)+V3I632).)3(+K)2'L)-=+4)3()-?+B(W+H6&0)-065)?+BH
`N
   
` X
`   
  
`  
` #        
`
`      
` 

`"

`   N
`
`7Y+Q+63+60012(1'3+-)2'L)-=+*R)21651*(
`FX                
    
`   
 
`   
`   
`
`    Z
` X
`  

` 

 
`[    # 
`     #
        #
 
` 
 
`
`
`     
`  
      \     
`   
 X 
 
`
    

`   \ 
`# 
` 

`
# 
 
`   
`]  
`
`  G ^
    
`
`"  
`     
    
` X   
`  _#
`  
       X N
`
`P-)E+>',,.63+Q'`3)-?+P'AC'a)-+451312Q+@)3L)-?+4'5'-60'
`Nb      
`

`   
   
`  

` Xc"Z 
`d
` eG
f 
    

 

`   
` 
"
`
`
`
`  
`  
`!   
` 
`  

`   
`

`     g
` 
`
`   N
`
`JI'.6*+<2H6&EI513?+<@?+TI@A4)3()-+,'-+T*=2I16(-=?+H6`-)32)?+</
`N
   
`
`  
`    
`   h   
 

`
` 
`   
`   g 
`
` "
`  \ 

   
`  
   
  

`      
`
      

`
`
` 
`#    
  
`    
     N
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A
`
`     
` 
 
` 
    
`
`               
`
`     
`    
`
`               
`
`>?@#PKL
`LKL@
`
`
`
`LKN@KL
`
`>JN?N>J @LK
`
`BLJ
`
`
R @  R L@ R    R   P S
`>?>
`
`#@ B
` >   @ 
`
`BLMNKL BLJ
`
`K N? #>O
`
`?C
`
`K C
`
` @
`
`    A
`
`     
`      
`
`B C DEEFDGGFHIIE
`
`     
`
 
` 
`
`
`    

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket