Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1201644
`
`Filing date:
`
`04/07/2022
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Ex parte appeal
`no.
`
`88848727
`
`Appellant
`
`vivawave Co., Ltd.
`
`Applied for mark
`
`MOOD NARRATIVE
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Attachments
`
`Appealed class
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`SANG HO LEE
`NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC
`3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAY
`SUITE 500
`FAIRFAX, VA 22030
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: docket@nkllaw.com
`Secondary email(s): djung@nkllaw.com, slee@nkllaw.com
`703-745-5495
`
`Appeal brief
`
`TL5691744-AppealBrief.pdf(756435 bytes )
`
`Class 003.
`All goods and services in the class are appealed, namely: Non-medicated skin
`care preparations being functional cosmetics; Nail cosmetics; Lip glosses; Non-
`medicated lip balm; Non-medicated make-up; Cosmetic preparations for baths;
`Body care cosmetics; Beauty care cosmetics; Non-medicated shampoos; Non-
`medicated toiletry preparations; Non-medicated cosmetic preparations for skin
`care; Hair rinses; Cosmetic creams;Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic
`oils; Make-up removing preparations; Cosmetics
`
`David Youngjoon Jung
`
`docket@nkllaw.com, slee@nkllaw.com, djung@nkllaw.com, sykim@nkllaw.com
`
`/David Youngjoon Jung/
`
`04/07/2022
`
`
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1201644
`
`Filing date:
`
`04/07/2022
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Ex parte appeal
`no.
`
`88848727
`
`Appellant
`
`vivawave Co., Ltd.
`
`Applied for mark
`
`MOOD NARRATIVE
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Attachments
`
`Appealed class
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`SANG HO LEE
`NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC
`3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAY
`SUITE 500
`FAIRFAX, VA 22030
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: docket@nkllaw.com
`Secondary email(s): djung@nkllaw.com, slee@nkllaw.com
`703-745-5495
`
`Appeal brief
`
`TL5691744-AppealBrief.pdf(756435 bytes )
`
`Class 003.
`All goods and services in the class are appealed, namely: Non-medicated skin
`care preparations being functional cosmetics; Nail cosmetics; Lip glosses; Non-
`medicated lip balm; Non-medicated make-up; Cosmetic preparations for baths;
`Body care cosmetics; Beauty care cosmetics; Non-medicated shampoos; Non-
`medicated toiletry preparations; Non-medicated cosmetic preparations for skin
`care; Hair rinses; Cosmetic creams;Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic
`oils; Make-up removing preparations; Cosmetics
`
`David Youngjoon Jung
`
`docket@nkllaw.com, slee@nkllaw.com, djung@nkllaw.com, sykim@nkllaw.com
`
`/David Youngjoon Jung/
`
`04/07/2022
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Application No.: 88848727
`
`
`Filing Date: March 26, 2020
`
`
`Mark: mood narrative
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In re vivawave Co., Ltd., Applicant
`
`
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`For online submission via ESTTA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant, vivawave Co., Ltd., respectfully appeals to the Trademark Trial & Appeal
`
`APPEAL BRIEF
`
`Board (Board) from the Trademark Examining Attorney’s refusal of Applicant’s application for
`
`Applicant’s mark “mood narrative” under Section 2(d) over registered marks “NARRATIVE”
`
`and “NARRATIVE COSMETICS.” The Board instituted the appeal on February 9, 2022, and
`
`allowed Applicant sixty days from the date of the Order to file a brief (or by April 10, 2022).
`
`Accordingly, Applicant’s appeal is timely.
`
`
`
`
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE RECORD
`
`Applicant filed a Section 1(b) and 44(d) application, Serial Number 88/848,727, for
`
`“mood narrative” (hereinafter, Applicant’s mark) on March 26, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On May 12, 2020, a non-final office action was issued in which the Examining Attorney
`
`partially refused registration of Applicant’s mark for the entire Class 3 goods, and particular
`
`services in Class 35, alleging a likelihood of confusion with marks NARRATIVE and
`
`NARRATIVE COSMETICS (hereinafter “cited marks” or “registered marks”) under Section
`
`2(d) of the Trademark Act. Applicant filed a timely Response on November 8, 2020.
`
`On March 4, 2021, the Trademark Examining Attorney suspended action on Applicant’s
`
`application pending the foreign application on which this application claims priority. In the
`
`examining attorney’s suspension letter, he maintained his partial Section 2(d) refusal. Applicant
`
`submitted foreign registration documents in its response to Suspension Letter on December 16,
`
`2021, thereby perfecting the Section 44(d) basis to the Section 44(e) basis.
`
`On February 7, 2022, the Trademark Examining issued a final office action, rendering his
`
`partial Section 2(d) refusal final. On February 9, 2022, applicant filed a notice of appeal without
`
`filing a request for reconsideration after final office action.
`
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
`
`The sole contested issue in this case is whether Applicant’s mark is likely to cause
`
`confusion with the cited marks.
`
`
`
`
`
`RECITATION OF THE FACTS
`
`Applicant’s mark MOOD NARRATIVE is for:
`
`Non-medicated skin care preparations being functional cosmetics; Nail cosmetics; Lip glosses;
`
`Non-medicated lip balm; Non-medicated make-up; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Body care
`
`cosmetics; Beauty care cosmetics; Non-medicated shampoos; Non-medicated toiletry
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`preparations; Non-medicated cosmetic preparations for skin care; Hair rinses; Cosmetic
`
`creams; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic oils; Make-up removing preparations;
`
`Cosmetics in International Class 3; and Advertising services; Marketing services; Import-export
`
`agency services; Comprehensive shopping mall by the internet; Sales brokerage services
`
`featuring telecommunications via electronic communications; Promotional services; Retail store
`
`services featuring cosmetic utensils; Wholesale store services featuring cosmetic utensils; Sales
`
`agency services featuring cosmetic utensils; Sales brokerage services featuring cosmetic
`
`utensils; Wholesale store services featuring cosmetics; Retail store services featuring cosmetics;
`
`Sales agency services featuring cosmetics; Sales brokerage services featuring cosmetics in
`
`International Class 35.
`
`
`
`The cited mark, NARRATIVE, registration number 2579928 is for:
`
`
`Retail store services in the field of apparel, fashion accessories, footwear, jewelry, cosmetics,
`
`fragrances, small leather goods and eyewear in International Class 35 (hereinafter “928
`
`registration”).
`
`
`
`
`The cited mark, NARRATIVE COSMETICS, registration number 5825710 is for:
`
`
`Theatrical make-up in International Class 3 (hereinafter “710 registration”).
`
`
`
`ARGUMENTS
`
`
`
`Applicant submits that there is no likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark and
`
`the cited marks because of the outweighing DuPont factors that there is no confusing similarity
`
`between Applicant’s mark and the cited marks due to differences in appearance, meaning and
`
`sound of the marks. Furthermore, Applicant’s mark imparts a different commercial impression
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`on the purchaser’s mind than that imparted by the cited marks. It has been held that these
`
`distinctions alone can be dispositive of the case. See Kellogg Co. v. Pack’em Enterprises, Inc.,
`
`21 U.S.P.Q.2d 1142, 951 F.2d 330, 333 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (affirming dissimilarity of the marks
`
`was dispositive of the likelihood of confusion issue); see also In re Covalinski, 113 U.S.P.Q.2d
`
`1166, Serial No. 85685983, 2014 WL 7496055, at *4 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 18, 2014) (finding the first
`
`DuPont factor, the differences between the marks, outweighs the other factors).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Applicant’s Mark Has a Different Appearance Than the Cited Marks
`
`Applicant’s Mark consists of two separate non-related words “MOOD” and “NARRATIVE.”
`
`On the other hand, the 928 registration only consists of the single word “NARRATIVE” and the
`
`710 registration also consists of one distinctive word, “NARRATIVE” with “COSMETICS”
`
`only used descriptively.
`
`The Examining Attorney argues that adding a term to a registered mark generally does not
`
`obviate the similarity between the compared marks, as in the present case, nor does it overcome a
`
`likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d). In coming to this conclusion, the Examining
`
`Attorney essentially argues that NARRATIVE has the most source identifying significance in
`
`Applicant’s mark. However, applicant argues that the addition of the term “MOOD” to
`
`NARRATIVE is sufficient to distinguish Applicant’s mark and the cited marks in their entireties
`
`because NARRATIVE is relatively a weak and diluted term. Applicant’s third-party registration
`
`evidence is relevant to the conceptual strength of the cited marks, not their commercial strength.
`
`Tao Licensing, LLC v. Bender Consulting Ltd., 125 USPQ2d 1043 (TTAB 2017) (“Use evidence
`
`may reflect commercial weakness, while third-party registration evidence that does not equate to
`
`proof of third-party use may bear on conceptual weakness if a term is commonly registered for
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`similar goods or services.”) (citing Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ
`
`693, 694-95(CCPA 1976)).
`
`Aside from the two coexisting cited marks (NARRATIVE and NARRATIVE
`
`COSMETICS), applicant submits that there are additional 73 live third-party registrations in
`
`which their marks contain the term NARRATIVE by itself or combined with other wording(s)
`
`(see Exhibit 1). Of the 73 live third-party registrations, applicant submits that there are at least 6
`
`marks that cover the goods related to applicant’s goods. For example, “N/C NARRATIVE” with
`
`registration number 5800244 covers “theatrical makeup” in International Class 3, and the
`
`“IDENTITY NARRATIVE” with registration number 5693644 covers “body and beauty care
`
`cosmetics” in International Class 3; “WP NARRATIVE” with registration number 5460767
`
`covers “advertising, marketing and promotional services” in International Class 35; “GUIDING
`
`NARRATIVE” with registration number 5411418 covers “marketing services” in International
`
`Class 35; and “INARRATIVE WOMAN” with registration number 5552502 covers “body and
`
`beauty care cosmetics” and “INARRATIVE MAN” with registration number 5552501 covers
`
`“cosmetic creams for skin care” in International Class 35. Thus, the term “NARRATIVE” is
`
`diluted given the evidence of 8 live third-party registrations using the term NARRATIVE which
`
`appear on their face to be related to applicant’s goods and services.
`
`Even if the term “Narrative” were found not to be diluted, Applicant’s mark “MOOD
`
`NARRATIVE” must be examined as a whole, and the addition of a distinctive term “MOOD” is
`
`sufficient to distinguish Applicant’s mark from the cited marks because such addition alters the
`
`overall commercial impression when compared with “NARRATIVE” marks standing alone.
`
`“Marks that are descriptive or highly suggestive are entitled to a narrower scope of protection,
`
`i.e., are less likely to generate confusion over source identification, than their more fanciful
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`counterparts.” Juice Generation, Inc. v. GS Enters. LLC, 794 F.3d 1334, 115 U.S.P.Q.2d 1671
`
`(Fed. Cir. 2015). The Court in Juice Generation ruled that the Board paid insufficient heed to the
`
`important principle in analyzing the three-word combination “PEACE LOVE AND JUICE”
`
`when the Board found likelihood of confusion with opposer’s “PEACE & LOVE” phrase by
`
`finding that “PEACE LOVE” is the dominant portion and ignoring the extra word “JUICE” in its
`
`analysis. Id. at 1341. The Court ruled that the “Board did not set forth an analysis showing that it
`
`avoided the error of giving no significance to the term, which is impermissible notwithstanding
`
`that the term is generic and disclaimed.” Id. at 1341.
`
`Here, Applicant’s mark is “MOOD NARRATIVE” and the term “MOOD” is neither generic
`
`nor descriptive. The term mood is defined as “a conscious state of mind or predominant
`
`emotion” according to Merriam-Webster (see Exhibit 2) and is an arbitrary word in relation to
`
`Applicant’s goods, namely, cosmetics, body and hair care products. On the other hand, narrative
`
`is defined as “something that is narrated: story, account” or “a way of presenting or
`
`understanding a situation or series of events that reflects and promotes a particular point of view
`
`or set of values” according to Merriam-Webster (see Exhibit 3). The word “NARRATIVE” in
`
`relation to cosmetics and make-up is a highly suggestive word since make-up is a way of
`
`presenting oneself to the world by enhancing or dramatically changing the looks. Thus, the term
`
`“MOOD” in Applicant’s mark is entitled to greater significance in the analysis than the word
`
`“NARRATIVE” because “MOOD” is an arbitrary term in relation to cosmetics, which makes it
`
`the most source identifying term and is sufficient to avoid any likelihood of confusion with the
`
`cited marks which evidently lack the term “MOOD.”
`
`When the marks are considered in their entireties, purchasers are not likely to dismiss the
`
`inherently distinctive term “MOOD” in Applicant’s mark and view that “MOOD
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`NARRRATIVE” identifies another product in each of Registrant’s “NARRATIVE” product
`
`lines. In addition, within a two-word mark, as Applicant’s mark, the first word is the more
`
`prominent of the two—both to the eye and to the ear. See Presto Prods., Inc. v. Nice-Pak Prods.,
`
`Inc., 9 USPQ2d 1895, 1897 (TTAB 1988) (“[I]t is often the first part of a mark which is most
`
`likely to be impressed upon the mind of a purchaser and remembered”).
`
`These differences in the appearance of the marks and especially the prominent part of
`
`“MOOD” in Applicant’s mark create distinct, significant commercial impressions in the
`
`purchaser’s mind such that this alone should dictate no likelihood of confusion.
`
`
`
`II.
`
`Applicant’s Mark Has a Different Meaning Than the Cited Mark.
`
`Applicant’s mark and the cited marks have completely different meanings due to the addition
`
`of the word “MOOD.” As aforementioned, the word “narrative” is defined as “something that is
`
`narrated: story, account” or “a way of presenting or understanding a situation or series of events
`
`that reflects and promotes a particular point of view or set of values”; the word “mood” is
`
`defined as a “conscious state of mind or predominant emotion: feeling.” Therefore, the words
`
`“mood” and “narrative” signify different things—one is an emotion, and another is a story. Since
`
`make-up can be applied in a manner that reflects one’s mood (e.g., glitter, festive eye makeup),
`
`Applicant’s mark “MOOD NARRATIVE” suggests that Applicant’s makeup can be used to
`
`express or narrate one’s feelings. Due to various studies that have been conducted to examine the
`
`relationship between applying make-up and its impact on one’s mood, Applicant’s mark also
`
`suggests that their makeup and cosmetics can boost one’s mood. Notably, the key word here is
`
`“mood”—boosting one’s mood or expressing one’s mood (see Exhibit 4).
`
`On the other hand, the cited marks “NARRATIVE” and “NARRATIVE COSMETICS” are
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`
`
`devoid of any emotive word. The mental association from the word “NARRATIVE” to the word
`
`“MOOD” is tentative, if not outright unattainable, and at best, in a literature context, mood is one
`
`of many literary devices that writers can use to weave a compelling narrative- a far-fetched
`
`mental gymnastics that is simply unreasonable to expect from average American consumers.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant’s mark connotes an emotion and or an atmosphere. On the other
`
`hand, the cited marks consist of passive, non-emotive words “narrative” and “cosmetics,” and
`
`emotive word is key to creating a unique commercial impression in Applicant’s mark. These
`
`differences in meaning alone imparts a different commercial impression between the marks.
`
`III. Applicant’s Mark Sounds Different Than the Cited Mark.
`
`In addition to the differences in appearance, meaning, and commercial impression between
`
`Applicant’s mark and the cited marks, the marks also sound different.
`
`Applicant’s mark sounds significantly different than the cited marks because an arbitrary
`
`term “mood” is the first word within Applicant’s two-word mark. Within a two-word mark, the
`
`first part, namely, “MOOD,” is the more prominent of the two—both to the eye and the ear.
`
`Applicant’s mark gives an elongated sound with the use of “moo” [u sound], whereas the cited
`
`marks noticeably lack any word that precedes the shared term “NARRATIVE.” The length of the
`
`marks is different and the number of syllables in each mark is also different.
`
`Because of the differences in appearance, meaning and sound between the marks,
`
`Applicant’s mark “MOOD NARRATIVE” inevitably imparts a completely different commercial
`
`impression than “NARRATIVE COSMETICS” and “NARRATIVE”. See In re Hartz Hotel
`
`Services, Inc., 102 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1150 (TTAB 2012) (finding that “GRAND HOTEL” is not likely
`
`to cause confusion with the mark “GRAND HOTEL NYC” because the of the highly suggestive
`
`nature of the mark “Grand Hotel” and the number of third-party “Grand Hotel” marks).
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`
`
`SUMMARY
`
`In view of the foregoing, there is clearly no likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s
`
`mark “MOOD NARRATIVE” and cited marks “NARRATIVE” and “NARRATIVE
`
`COSMETICS,” and it is respectfully requested that the Section 2(d) refusal be withdrawn, and
`
`that Applicant’s trademark application be remanded for publication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 7, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Sang Ho Lee/
`Sang Ho Lee
`
`David Youngjoon Jung
`Soyeon Kim
`
`NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC
`3251 Old Lee Highway
`Suite 500
`Fairfax, VA 22030
`Telephone: (703) 745-5495
`Facsimile: (703) 563-9748
`Email:
`Email:
`
`Attorneys for Applicant vivawave Co., Ltd.
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Live third-party registrations of TESS Search current up to March 28, 2022 excluding the
`
`cited marks
`
`NARRATIVE HEALING (6612096), REDEFINING OUR NARRATIVE (6551364), CTRL
`
`THE NARRATIVE (6505409), NARRATIVE IMAGES (6459336), THE NARRATIVE
`
`TRUST (64115512), THE NEXT DOOR NARRATIVE (6398232), THE FAMILY
`
`NARRATIVE (6007467), NARRATIVE (6592697), NARRATIVE PLENIITUDE (6577418),
`
`ONE WORD CAN CHANGE THE NARRATIVE (6571859), SMART NARRATIVE
`
`(6548057), NARRATIVE BALLISTICS (6503341), BETTER NARRATIVE (6495897),
`
`NARRATIVE COFFEE ROASTERS (6207391), NARRATIVE (6190809), NARRATIVE413
`
`(6167477), CHANGE THE NARRATIVE (6077764), NEW YORK & NARRATIVE
`
`(6074529), THE NARRATIVE INITIATIVE (5907317), NARRATIVE DYNAMICS
`
`(5883439), THE LOVE NARRATIVE (5834088), SCAN-STRATEGIC CULTURAL
`
`AGILITITY NARRATIVE (5811309), IDENTITY NARRATIVE SCENT AS ART (5759417),
`
`MR. NARRATIVE (5906082), NARRATIVE SCIENCE (5865083), NARRATIVE N
`
`SCIENCE (5865082), NARRATIVE ANCHOR (6455896), INVISIBLE NARRATIVES
`
`(6364745), NARRATIVE IMPRINTING (5367584), NARRATIVE (6185519), NARRATIVE 4
`
`(5356037), THE NARRATIVE SALON (5874804), NARRATIVE GROUP (5865177),
`
`VISUAL ART NARRATIVE (5788838), EXOVERA NARRATIVES (5776690), WP
`
`NARRATIVE (5700967), IDENTITY NARRATIVE (5693644), IN IDENTITY NARRATIVE
`
`(5587858), NARRATIVE A.W.E. (5548886), NARRATIVES FROM THE BLACK
`
`DIASPORA AND BEYOND (5444542), THE NARRATIVE SALON (5521391), THE
`
`NARRATIVE METHOD (5505119), NARRATIVE (5288889), NARRATIVE (5288882),
`
`NAKED NARRATIVES (527538), THE NEW NARRATIVE (5317653), MASTER
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`
`
`NARRRATIVES(5064998), NARRATIVE ANLAYTICS(5064945), TRAUMA ART
`NARRRATIVES (5064998), NARRATIVE ANLAYTICS (5064945), TRAUMA ART
`
`NARRATIVE THERAPY(4862429), MAY THE NARRATIVE BE WITH YOU(4681408),
`NARRATIVE THERAPY (4862429), MAY THE NARRATIVE BE WITH YOU (4681408),
`
`NARRATIVE CAPITAL(5899929), NARRATIVE HEALTH STRATEGIES(5070326,
`NARRATIVE CAPITAL (5899929), NARRATIVE HEALTH STRATEGIES (5070326,
`
`5079891), COLOR NARRATIVE (5187684), AGILE NARRATIVE(5258003), DOUBLEBIT
`5079891), COLOR NARRATIVE (5187684), AGILE NARRATIVE (5258003), DOUBLEBIT
`
`NARRATIVE(5120973), PANIC PURPOSE AETHETIC NARRATIVE INFLUENCE
`NARRATIVE (5120973), PANIC PURPOSE AETHETIC NARRATIVE INFLUENCE
`
`CRAFTSMANSHIP (5051377), PUBLIC NARRATIVE P. (5010805), “THE ONLY WAY TO
`CRAFTSMANSHIP (5051377), PUBLIC NARRATIVEP. (5010805), “THE ONLY WAY TO
`
`CHANGE THE NARRATIVE IS TO WRITE THE NARRATIVE”(4993345), PUBLIC
`CHANGETHE NARRATIVE IS TO WRITE THE NARRATIVE”(4993345), PUBLIC
`
`NARRATIVE(4966527), NARRATIVE SCIENCE(4057283), NARRATIVE(4313648), H
`NARRATIVE (4966527), NARRATIVE SCIENCE (4057283), NARRATIVE (4313648), H
`
`NARRATIVES(4645889), NARRATIVE(5010393), NARRATIVEBRANDING(0910225),
`NARRATIVES (4645889), NARRATIVE (5010393), NARRATIVEBRANDING (0910225),
`
`NARRATIVE PRESS (2859113), NARRATIVE SOUND DESIGN (3625474), “N/C
`NARRATIVEPRESS (2859113), NARRATIVE SOUND DESIGN (3625474), “N/C
`
`NARRATIVE” (5800244), “IDENTITY NARRATIVE” (5693644), “WP NARRATIVE”
`NARRATIVE?”(5800244), “IDENTITY NARRATIVE?”(5693644), “WP NARRATIVE”
`
`(5460767), “GUIDING NARRATIVE” (5411418), “INARRATIVE WOMAN”(5552502)
`(5460767), “GUIDING NARRATIVE?”(5411418), “INARRATIVE WOMAN”(5552502)
`
`“INARRATIVE MAN” (5552501)
`“INARRATIVE MAN?”(5552501)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-12-
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`
`
`x
`
`Oo
`-
`x |
`1 =) Mood Definition & Meaning-
`~@ £ & ©
`Aa
`<
`GA (@_https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mood
`
`
`GAMES & QUIZZES|THESAURUS|WORDOFTHEDAY|FEATURES|SHOP V|SUBSCRIBE eel) ie
`
`bores
`£34.99 vorime|addtecat|
`
`Peet's Coffee, Dark Roast K-Cup Podsfor...
`esteteete20,950
`
`SINCE 1828
`
`fiineteyel
`Pears
`
`x Q
`
`mood noun(1)
`
`.
`
`Srey
`
`
`\'mid @\
`Definition of mood (Entry 1 of 2)
`1
`:aconscious state of mind or predominant emotion : FEELING
`TCL10L, Unlocked Android Smartphone...
`// He's been in a good moodall week.
`WwwWL 4168
`3
`4
`5
`:
`
`also : the expression of moodespecially in art orliterature $279.99 vprime[Shopnow|
`archaic: a fit of anger : RAGE
`2
`
`TCL
`Incredible 48MPAl
`Triple Camera
`
`:aprevailing attitude
`// the kind of moodthat fostered the Salem witchtrials
`— NatHentoff
`:areceptive state of mind predisposing to action
`b
`
`// was notin a giving moodat the time .SeeDefinitionsandExamples »
`
`
`GrannyBella's Easter...
`:a distinctive atmosphere or context :
`¢
`$14.99 yprime
`Get Word ofthe Day daily email!
`// the weary city's sullen mood
`
`Your emails
`CU Path 1
`Marilyn Stasio
`
`3
`
`a
`
`WORD OF THE DAY
`
`ee
`xg
`call
`palatable ®
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-14-
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`o
`-
`x |
`0 Narrative Definition & Meaning
`~@ £ & ©
`Aa
`&
`GA ©)
`_https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/narrative
`
`
`GAMES & QUIZZES|THESAURUS|WORDOFTHEDAY|FEATURES|SHOP Vv|SUBSCRIBE eelH
`
`
`
`x
`
`b>
`Granny Bella's Easter Gourmet Chocolate Cookie Gift Baskets, 15...
`SewwwHy605 $29.99 vprime
`
`SIGE narrative
`
`boat)
`
`x Q Pyeeieisg
`
`narrative noun
`© Save Word
`nar-ra‘tive |
`\ ‘ner-e-tiv 0. na-re- \
`Definition of narrative (Entry 1 of 2)
`1
`a
`:something that is narrated : STORY, ACCOUNT
`// He is writing a detailed narrative ofhislife on the island.
` : a wayof presenting or understanding a situation or series of events that
`reflects and promotesa particular point of view or set of values
`/1 Therise of the Tea Party and the weaknessof the Obama economy have
`fueled a Republican narrative about Big Governmentas a threattoliberty...
`— Michael Grunwald
`/1/ The media narrative around Kelly's appointment had twocentral ideas... :
`pala table @
`He would calm and professionalize the White House, and he would provide a
`more measured leadership style than his boss.
`See Definitions and Examples »
`— Perry BaconJr.
`GrannyBella's Easter Gourmet Chocolate Cookie Gift Baskets, 15... >
`x
`.
`Day daily email!
`Wiewewey 605 $29.99 yprime
`2: theart or practice
`//...
`depended not
`ess
`Pte 114
`
`
`
`the book jump.
`
`b
`
`Easter Gourme...
`Graney pelle
`$29.99 vprime
`
`WORD OF THE DAY
`
`b
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-16-
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Old Dominion University
`ODU Digital Commons
`
`
`STEM Education & Professional Studies
`OTS Master's Level Projects & Papers
`
`
`2010
`
`Makeup's Effects on Self-Perception
`
`Lauren Silverio
`Old Dominion University
`
`Follow this and additional works at https ///digitalcommons.odu_edu/ots_masters_projects
`
`
`Recommended Citation
`Silverio, Lauren, "Makeup’s Effects on Self-Perception’ (2010). OTS Master's Level Projects & Papers. 49.
`https.//digitalcommons.odu_edu/ots_masters_projects/49
`
`This Master's Project is brought to you for free and open access by the STEM Education & Professional Studies at
`ODU Digital Commons. it has been accepted for inclusion in OTS Master's Level Projects & Papers by an authorized
`administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact digitelcommons@odu.edu.
`
`
`
`
`
`-18 -
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`
`
`(0
`
`x |
`EE 6 Ways Makeup Can Actually Im
`G @_
` & https://www.businessinsider.com/6-ways-makeup-can-actually-improve-your-mental-health-2017-8
`
`Sawe
`
`-
`
`a
`
`©
`
`= a
`in the news
`US MARKETS CLOSED
`
`~~ Dow Jones +0.97%
`
`‘Nasdaq #1.84%
`
` “ S&P500 41.23%
`
`‘TSLA+0.28%
`
` FB+283% BABA +17%
`
`INSIDER
`
`2 ED
`
`2
`
`——
`
`COXx
`eal
`Sapa oe)a
`
`en eee
`
`eT
`
`HOME >
`
`INSIDER
`
`6 ways makeupcanactually improve your mental health
`srr:
`Ruby Buddemeyer, StyleCaster Aug 4, 2017, 3:16 PM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-19-
`- 19 -
`
`€
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` es make-up make you feel=
`[e
`ttps://scholar.harvard.edu/
`
`RVARD UNIVERSITY
`
`
` x
`
`
`
`Rocco Palumbo, Ph.D.
`VA Healthcare System
`50 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130
`Contact
`
`
`
`Home
`
`Publications
`
`Contacts
`
`HOME | PUBLICATIONS /
`
`Does make-up make youfeel smarter? The
`“lipstick effect” extended to academic
`achievement
`Citation:
`N., & Di Domenico, A. (2017), Does make-up make you
`8., Mammaretla,
`Palumbo, R., Fairfield,
`
`feel smarter? The “lipstick effect”
`extended to academic achievement Cogent Psychology, 4 (1).
` DownioadCi
`Abstract:
`Previous studies have shownthathigherleveis of self-esteem are associated with better academic
`performance. However,
`there is no evidence if make-up canindirectly influence academic
`achievementandcognition throughself-esteem.
`In this study, we examined the possibility that make-
`up canaffect academic performance by asking 186 female undergraduate studentsto take a
`simulated university examination. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups, which
`
`Recent Publications
`Editorial: New boundaries between aging
`cognition, and emotions
`Testing factor structure and measurement
`invariance across genderwithItalian Geriatric
`Anxiety Scale
`Whenand wherein aging:
`source monitoring
`Commentary:
`Interaction between facial
`expression and color
`Does make-up makeyoufee! smarter? The
`lipstick effect” extended to academic
`achievement
`
`the role of music on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-20 -
`- 20 -
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
