Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1074462
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/12/2020
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`Applicant
`
`87495623
`
`Mano & Mano Pty Ltd
`
`Applied for Mark
`
`QUINN'S
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`TEDD LEVINE
`LAW OFFICES OF TEDD S. LEVINE, LLC
`31 KRISTIN LN.
`HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: lawofficesofteddslevine@gmail.com
`(516) 770-3131
`
`Submission
`
`Attachments
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Appeal Brief
`
`QUINNS-TTAB Appeal Brief-8-12-20-CORRECTED CAPTION.pdf(188672
`bytes )
`Exhibit A-1.pdf(39087 bytes )
`Exhibit L-1.pdf(231569 bytes )
`
`Tedd S Levine
`
`lawofficesofteddslevine@gmail.com
`
`/Tedd S Levine/
`
`08/12/2020
`
`

`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPEAL BRIEF
`
`
`------------------------------------------------------X
`In re: MANO & MANO PTY LTD,
`Appeal from a Final Office Action
`refusing registration based upon
`Sections 2(d) and 2(e)(4).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`
`
`Number:
`
`
`
`87495623
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant Mano & Mano Pty Ltd. (“Applicant”) appeals from a Final Office Action
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`
`of the examining attorney that refused registration on the grounds of (1) Section 2(d)
`
`Likelihood of Confusion with U.S. Registration No. 5676297 – REFUSAL, and (2) Section
`
`2(e)(4) Primarily Merely a Surname – REFUSAL.
`
`JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
`
`
`
`An appeal was timely filed before the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board on June
`
`15, 2020.
`
`STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
`
`Issue 1:
`
`Whether there exists a valid allegation of likelihood of confusion with
`
`QWINN, U.S. Registration No. 5676297, and the trademark QUINN’S,
`
`when considering the United States Patent & Trademark Office previously
`
`determined otherwise by permitting QWINN to be registered knowing the
`
`present application had priority?
`
`Issue 2:
`
`Whether the Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion refusal continues to be
`
`appropriate in view of the failure of the registrant of U.S. Registration No.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`5676297 to timely answer Petition to Cancel No. 92074479 which is before
`
`the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board?
`
`Issue 3:
`
`Whether the Section 2(e)(4) Primarily Merely a Surname refusal is
`
`appropriate in view of Applicant demonstrating the mark has secondary
`
`meaning which the United States Patent & Trademark Office accepted in a
`
`previous proceeding?
`
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`A.
`
`The Nature of the Case
`
`In response to the Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion refusal, the examining
`
`attorney found that Applicant unpersuasively argues against the refusal.
`
`The Examining Attorney found Applicant’s argument that the applied-for mark has
`
`an earlier filing date than the registration, while true, is unfortunately unpersuasive because
`
`during ex parte prosecution, the trademark examining attorney has no authority to review
`
`or to decide on matters that constitute a collateral attack on the cited registration. TMEP
`
`§1207.01(d)(iv). Such arguments may, however, be pertinent to a formal proceeding before
`
`the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel the cited registration. To that end,
`
`Applicant has since filed, which the cited Registrant failed to timely answer, a Petition to
`
`Cancel No. 92074479. The Petition clearly establishes a prima facie case that the present
`
`application has priority over the cited registration.
`
`The Examining Attorney determined further that Applicant’s argument that the
`
`applied-for mark, which has an earlier filing date than the registration, should be allowed
`
`to proceed to registration because it was not cited against the same registration, is equally
`
`unpersuasive because prior decisions and actions of other trademark examining attorneys
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`in registering other marks have little evidentiary value and are not binding upon the USPTO
`
`or the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Applicant should also note that the same
`
`justification applies to the argument that the applied-for mark should be allowed
`
`registration because Applicant already owns registrations for the same mark for retail
`
`services in Class 035 – but not for identical goods as in the present application, as claimed
`
`by Applicant.
`
`Here, this rationale leads to an illogical and unfair result. The current conclusion
`
`that QUINN’S is confusingly similar to QWINN is actually disproven by the USPTO’s
`
`decision to allow the QWINN mark to proceed to registration knowing of the existing
`
`application for QUINN’S. Since the USPTO previously failed to find a likelihood of
`
`confusion between the marks, it would be contradictory to now alter that view. While
`
`decisions among examining attorneys may not be binding, the inequity of an examining
`
`attorney capriciously disregarding the prosecution history of a cited registration because
`
`he or she can should not be sanctioned.
`
`This same injustice arises in response to the Section 2(e)(4) Primarily Merely a
`
`Surname refusal. Again, a parallel question arises as to whether Applicant should be
`
`precluded from registering the mark QUINN’S when the USPTO previously raised the
`
`same issues and reached a determination that the mark acquired secondary meaning on the
`
`merits.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`3
`
`

`

`o The present application for registration for QUINN’S is for CLASS 3: Toning lotion,
`
`for the face, body and hands; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse. FIRST USE
`
`ANYWHERE and IN COMMERCE: August 2016; This application was filed on June
`
`19, 2017.
`
`o Applicant owns the registration for QUINN’S, Registration Number 5671747, in
`
`connection with CLASS 35, on-line retail store services featuring lavender witch hazel
`
`toner, rose water witch hazel toner, unscented witch hazel toner, alcohol free fresh mint
`
`mouthwash, and unscented castile soap. This mark was registered on February 5, 2019;
`
`FIRST USE ANYWHERE and IN COMMERCE: August 2016; Application Date:
`
`April 14, 2018.
`
`o The cited mark QWINN, Registration Number 5676297, is registered in connection
`
`with CLASS 3, facial cleansing milk; facial oils; facial scrubs; skin masks; skin
`
`moisturizer masks; beauty serums; face oils; facial beauty masks; facial cream; facial
`
`lotion; facial moisturizers; facial washes; non-medicated anti-aging serum; non-
`
`medicated skin serums; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum. This
`
`mark was registered on February 12, 2019; FIRST USE ANYWHERE and IN
`
`COMMERCE: November 19, 2018; Application Date: November 16, 2017.
`
`o A search of the mark QUINN’S using the Trademark Electronic Search System
`
`(TESS), shows 93 records found, none of which include QWINN. Likewise, a search
`
`of QWINN, shows one record was found for that mark.
`
`o In accordance with the rules of the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board, on June 15,
`
`2020, the Petition to Cancel Reg. No. 5676297 was filed with the TTAB and the
`
`requisite filing fee was paid to the TTAB.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`o In accordance with Rule § 2.101(b) of the Trademark Rules of Practice, on the June 15,
`
`2020, a Petition to Cancel Reg. No. 5676297, Petition No. 92074479, was served on
`
`the Registrant by causing a true and correct copy thereof to be deposited in the United
`
`States Mail, as first-class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
`
`Dan, Young d/b/a Quintessential Shoppe
`2818 Holly Avenue
`Arcadia, CA 91007
`
`o Pursuant to the CONFERENCE, DISCOVERY, DISCLOSURE AND TRIAL
`
`SCHEDULE filed by the TTAB on June 15, 2020, the deadline for the Time to Answer
`
`the Petition to Cancel Reg. No. 5676297 was July 25, 2020. To date, no Answer has
`
`been served or filed in this matter.
`
`o On August 3, 2020, Applicant filed a motion for default with regard to the Petition to
`
`Cancel Reg. No. 5676297.
`
`o The prosecution history for the mark QUINN’S COSMETICS, Registration Number
`
`6000116, owned by the Applicant, shows a Priority Office Action dated May 18, 2019,
`
`that refused registration due to a belief that the applied-for mark is primarily merely a
`
`surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP
`
`§1211. Applicant responded to the office action, providing a plethora of evidence that
`
`demonstrates QUINN’S acquired secondary meaning in connection with the use of
`
`cosmetic products. The mark QUINN’S COSMETICS was thereafter registered on
`
`May 3, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`5
`
`

`

`I.
`
`THE FACTS DO NOT SUPPORT A REFUSAL TO REGISTER THE MARK
`QUINN’S BASED UPON SECTION 2(d) LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`WITH U.S. REGISTRATION NO. 5676297 FOR QWINN.
`________________________________________________________________________
`
`A. Applicant’s mark QUINN’S has priority over the cited registration for
`QWINN, U.S. Registration No. 5676297, which registration is in the process of
`being cancelled.
`
`
`Since 1989, priority of use can be obtained by filing an application for federal
`
`registration, which, upon registration, confers a “constructive use” date of first use. That
`
`“constructive use” priority can be defeated by another party’s evidence of a prior actual
`
`use.” McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 16:1.50 (5th ed.) Capital Grille
`
`Holdings, Inc. v. Historic Hotels of Nashville, LLC, No. 3:19-CV-00576, 2020 WL
`
`1332401, at *4 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 23, 2020). Lanham Act § 7(c), establishes
`
`a trademark application as constructive use “[c]ontingent on registration of a mark.” 15
`
`U.S.C. § 1057(c). See Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc., 525 F.3d 8, 18
`
`(D.C. Cir. 2008). Under § 2(d), an intent-to-use applicant prevails over any opposer who
`
`began using a similar mark after the intent-to-use filing date. Covering applications of all
`
`types, including § 1(b) applications, § 2(d) simply says a mark is invalid if there is a
`
`likelihood of confusion with a mark “previously used.” 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d).
`
`Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001, 525 F.3d at 18. Thus, contingent on the registration of a
`
`mark on the principal register, the filing of the application to register such mark shall
`
`constitute constructive use of the mark, conferring a right of priority, nationwide in effect,
`
`on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the registration against any other
`
`person except for a person whose mark has not been abandoned and who, prior to
`
`such filing (1) has used the mark; (2) has filed an application to register the mark which is
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`pending or has resulted in registration of the mark; or (3) has filed a foreign application to
`
`register the mark on the basis of which he or she has acquired a right of priority, and timely
`
`files an application under section 1126(d) of this title to register the mark which is pending
`
`or has resulted in registration of the mark. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057(b), (c). See San Diego Cty.
`
`Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union, No. 18CV967-GPC(MSB), 2020 WL
`
`1864781, at *4 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020).
`
`In this matter, the present application clearly has priority and Applicant is entitled
`
`to registration of its mark. The cited mark QWINN, Registration Number 5676297, is
`
`registered in connection with CLASS 3, facial cleansing milk; facial oils; facial scrubs;
`
`skin masks; skin moisturizer masks; beauty serums; face oils; facial beauty masks; facial
`
`cream; facial lotion; facial moisturizers; facial washes; non-medicated anti-aging serum;
`
`non-medicated skin serums; skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum. This
`
`mark was registered on February 12, 2019; FIRST USE ANYWHERE and IN
`
`COMMERCE: November 19, 2018; Application Date: November 16, 2017. The present
`
`application for registration for QUINN’S is for CLASS 3: Toning lotion, for the face, body
`
`and hands; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse. FIRST USE ANYWHERE and IN
`
`COMMERCE: August 2016; This application was filed on June 19, 2017. Consequently,
`
`Applicant has priority since its application date was filed approximately five months before
`
`the cited registration and was first used more than two years earlier.
`
`As a result of the Petition to Cancel Reg. No. 5676297, Petition No. 92074479, for
`
`QWINN, filed and served in accordance with the rules of the Trademark Trial and Appeals
`
`Board on June 15, 2020, and as a result of the cited Registrant’s failure to timely answer
`
`such Petition on or before the established deadline of July 25, 2020, Reg. No. 5676297
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`should be cancelled, the 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal withdrawn, and the present
`
`application approved for publication.
`
`B. Applicant’s mark QUINN’S was known to the USPTO when it approved the
`application for the cited registration QWINN and no likelihood of confusion
`was found.
`
`During the application process, “In evaluating an application, the examining
`
`attorney conducts a search of USPTO records to determine whether there is a conflict
`
`between the mark in the application and a mark that is either registered or pending in the
`
`USPTO. The principal factors considered in reaching this decision are the similarity of the
`
`marks and the commercial relationship between the goods and services identified by the
`
`marks. To find a conflict, it is not required that the marks and the goods/services be exactly
`
`the same; instead, it is sufficient if the marks are similar and the goods and or services
`
`related such that consumers would mistakenly believe they come from the same source.”
`
`See
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/trademark/additional-guidance-and-resources/possible-
`
`grounds-refusal-mark “If the examining attorney determines that a mark should not be
`
`registered, the examining attorney will issue a letter (office action) to you explaining
`
`any substantive reasons for refusal, and any technical or procedural deficiencies in the
`
`application.”
`
`See https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-getting-started/trademark-
`
`process#step4 “If the examining attorney raises no objections to registration, or if you
`
`overcome all objections, the examining attorney will approve the mark for publication. . .”. Id.,
`
`Step 5.
`
`
`
`Here, the present application for registration for QUINN’S is for CLASS 3 in
`
`connection with toning lotion, for the face, body and hands; Non-medicated mouth wash
`
`and rinse. The cited mark QWINN is registered in connection with CLASS 3 for facial
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`cleansing milk; facial oils; facial scrubs; skin masks; skin moisturizer masks; beauty
`
`serums; face oils; facial beauty masks; facial cream; facial lotion; facial moisturizers; facial
`
`washes; non-medicated anti-aging serum; non-medicated skin serums; skin care products,
`
`namely, non-medicated skin serum. As acknowledged by the examining attorney, “the
`
`applied-for mark has an earlier filing date than the registration.” Hence, during the
`
`prosecution of the mark QWINN, the USPTO had knowledge of Applicant’s prior filing
`
`for QUINN on June 19, 2017.
`
`Alternatively, in the event Reg. No. 5676297 is not cancelled as discussed above,
`
`no likelihood of confusion should be found. Since the goods are accepted as being related,
`
`the current conclusion that QUINN’S is confusingly similar to QWINN in terms of
`
`appearance, sound, and commercial impression is belied by the USPTO’s decision to allow
`
`the QWINN mark to proceed to registration knowing of the existing application for
`
`QUINN’S. Under this view, Applicant is not seeking a “collateral attack” on the cited
`
`registration; in fact, quite the opposite. Since the USPTO didn’t find a likelihood of
`
`confusion between the marks QUINN’S and QWINN when approving the application of
`
`QWINN, it should likewise not find a likelihood of confusion between the marks QUINN’S
`
`and QWINN when approving the application for QUINN’S. Based on that rationale, the
`
`2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal should be withdrawn and the present application
`
`approved for publication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`________________________________________________________________________
`
`II.
`
`THE FACTS DO NOT SUPPORT A REFUSAL TO REGISTER THE MARK
`QUINN’S BASED UPON SECTION 2(e) PRIMARILY MERELY A
`SURNAME.
`________________________________________________________________________
`
`A. Having acquired secondary meaning, Applicant’s mark QUINN’S is not
`merely a surname.
`
`The question of acquired distinctiveness of a mark is a question of fact, and the
`
`Boards findings are reviewed for support by substantial evidence. See Hoover Co. v. Royal
`
`Appliance Mfg. Co., 238 F.3d 1357, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2001); In re La. Fish Fry Prods., Ltd.,
`
`797 F.3d 1332, 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “[W]e determine whether, on the entirety of the
`
`record, there was substantial evidence to support the determination,” In re Hotels.com, LP,
`
`573 F.3d 1300, 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2007), which requires “such relevant evidence as a
`
`reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,” Consol. Edison Co. of
`
`N.Y. v. N.L.R.B, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938); see Schlafly v. Saint
`
`Louis Brewery, LLC, 909 F.3d 420, 423 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
`
`The statute states that “[t]he Director may accept as prima facie evidence that the
`
`mark has become distinctive, as used on or in connection with the applicant’s goods in
`
`commerce, proof of substantially exclusive and continuous use thereof as a mark by the
`
`applicant in commerce for the five years before the date on which the claim of
`
`distinctiveness is made.” Id. Section 2.41 of Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations in
`
`relevant part, provides that the following types of evidence may be considered to show
`
`secondary meaning:
`
`(1) Ownership of prior registration(s). In appropriate cases, ownership of one or
`
`more active prior registrations on the Principal Register or under the Trademark Act of
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`1905 of the same mark may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness if the
`
`goods or services are sufficiently similar to the goods or services in the application;
`
`however, further evidence may be required.
`
`(2) Five years substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce. In
`
`appropriate cases, if a trademark or service mark is said to have become distinctive of the
`
`applicant’s goods or services by reason of the applicant’s substantially exclusive and
`
`continuous use of the mark in commerce for the five years before the date on which the
`
`claim of distinctiveness is made, a showing by way of verified statements in the application
`
`may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness; however, further evidence may
`
`be required.
`
`(3) Other evidence. In appropriate cases, where the applicant claims that a mark
`
`has become distinctive in commerce of the applicant’s goods or services, the applicant
`
`may, in support of registrability, submit with the application, or in response to a request for
`
`evidence or to a refusal to register, verified statements, depositions, or other appropriate
`
`evidence showing duration, extent, and nature of the use in commerce and advertising
`
`expenditures in connection therewith (identifying types of media and attaching typical
`
`advertisements), and verified statements, letters or statements from the trade or public, or
`
`both, or other appropriate evidence of distinctiveness.
`
`See 37 C.F.R. § 2.41(a).
`
`Here, the question is whether Applicant should be precluded from registering the
`
`mark QUINN’S based on a presumption by the examining attorney that the mark is merely
`
`a surname when the USPTO previously raised the same issue and reached a different
`
`determination. To that end, the rules are clear. The USPTO “is free to change
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`prior rulings and decisions so long as such action is not done capriciously or arbitrarily.”
`
`Apple Inc. v. Personalized Media Commc'ns, No. IPR2016-01520, 2019 WL 4559364, at
`
`*2 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 19, 2019). It is of no consequence that the cited matter concerns the
`
`prosecution
`
`of
`
`a
`
`patent
`
`and
`
`not
`
`a
`
`trademark.
`
`
`
`“An
`
`agency
`
`acts arbitrarily and capriciously when
`
`it renders
`
`inconsistent decisions on materially
`
`identical facts without explanation” Vicor Corp. v. SynQor Inc., 869 F.3d 1309, 1322–23
`
`(Fed. Cir. 2017).
`
`In U.S. Application Serial No. 88328043 for the mark QUINN’S COSMETICS
`
`filed by Applicant, the USPTO issued an office action dated May 18, 2019 claiming the
`
`use of QUINN’S “is refused [registration] because the applied-for mark is primarily merely
`
`a surname. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP §1211.” In
`
`reply, on November 7, 2019, Applicant provided a plethora of documentation declared to
`
`be true and legal analysis demonstrating secondary meaning of Applicant’s use of
`
`QUINN’S in connection with lavender witch hazel toner, rose water witch hazel toner,
`
`unscented witch hazel toner, alcohol free fresh mint mouthwash, and unscented castile
`
`soap. (Such reply and evidence are incorporated herein by reference.) On November 27,
`
`2019, the mark was approved for publication. Thus, it was determined that consumers
`
`connect QUINN’S to Applicant when such mark is used with such goods. QUINN’S
`
`COSMETICS was registered on the Principal Register on Mar 3, 2020, Reg. No. 6,000,116.
`
`The registration provides for “Sec 2(F) as to QUINN’S”. Section 2(F) permits registration
`
`of marks that, despite not qualifying for registration in light of Section 2(e), have
`
`nevertheless "become distinctive of the applicant's goods in commerce." The evidence that
`
`is part of the record (attached to the reply to the USPTO office action dated May 18, 2019
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`in the matter of U.S. Application Serial No. 88328043) demonstrates QUINN’S acquired
`
`secondary meaning in connection with the same branded products that are the subject of
`
`the current application. Such evidence is as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibits
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A
`B
`C
`D
`E
`F
`G
`H
`I
`
`J
`K
`L
`
`M
`
`N
`O
`
`Description
`
`Sales Analysis – July 2018 - November 2019 1
`Customer reviews of Soap Product
`Customer reviews of Facial Mist Product
`Customer reviews of Witch Hazel Product
`Customer reviews of Witch Hazel Product
`Customer reviews of Witch Hazel Product
`Packaging for multiple QUINN’S branded products
`Over 1,000 additional customer reviews
`Links to multiple nationwide retail chain websites including
`Amazon & TJ Maxx
`Blogs and online reviews of the QUINN’S branded products
`QUINN’S website page
`QUINN’S advertising data from April 2016 – February
`20192
`Proof that QUINN’S witch hazel is well recognized as a
`leading brand
`Additional QUINN’S products launched in 2019
`A celebrity endorsement of QUINN’S branded product by
`Khloe Kardashian
`
`
`Based on the prior decision of the USPTO, the evidence provided that demonstrates
`
`secondary meaning, and prior registrations of the same mark by the Applicant, the 2(e)
`
`merely a surname refusal should be withdrawn and the present application approved for
`
`publication.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Sales for QUINN’S branded products from July 2019 thru June 2020 equate to
`approximately $1.4MM of which $1.3MM were in the United States (see Ex. A-1,
`Supplemental Sales data).
`2 Additional advertising data for 2020 (see Ex. L-1).
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`For the reasons stated above, none of grounds maintained in the office actions
`
`issued by the examining attorney warrant a refusal to register the applied for trademark.
`
`
`Dated: August 12, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAW OFFICES OF TEDD S. LEVINE, LLC
`
`By:__/s/Tedd S. Levine_________
`Tedd S. Levine, Esq.
`31 Dock Rd., Suite 162
`Remsenburg, NY 11960
`Tel: (631) 325-1453
`email: lawofficesofteddslevine@ gmail.com
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Mano & Mano Pty Ltd
`11 Duigan Drive
`Moorabbin Airport
`VIC 3194
`
`Analyse Sales [Item Spreadsheet]
`
`June 2020
`
`10/08/2020
`8:37:12 AM
`Item #
`
`0301- AUS
`0301
`0301- CAN & UK
`0301- T J MAXX
`0302
`0302- AUS
`0302- CAN & UK
`0302- T J MAXX
`0303
`0303-T J MAXX
`0301 UK
`03031
`03031- T J MAXX
`03032
`03032- CAN & UK
`03032- T J MAXX
`03033 CAN & UK
`03033 T J MAXX
`0305
`0305- T J MAXX
`0305 UK
`0306
`0306 - T J MAXX
`0307
`0307- CAN & UK
`0307- T J MAXX
`0308
`0308- CAN & UK
`0308- T J MAXX
`03081- CAN & UK
`03081- T J MAXX
`03082- CAN & UK
`03082- T J MAXX
`0309
`03099
`0401
`0402
`0403
`0501A- T J MAXX PRO
`0501A- T J MAXX
`0501B- T J MAXX
`0501C- T J MAXX
`
`Item Name
`
`July
`
`August
`
`September
`
`October
`
`November
`
`December
`
`January
`
`February
`
`March
`
`April
`
`May
`
`June
`
`Quinns ROSE witch hazel
`Quinns Rose witch hazel 16oz
`Quinns Rose witch hazel 16oz
`Quinns ROSe Witch Hazel
`Quinns Unscented 16oz
`Quinn's UNSCENT witch hazel
`Quinns Unscented 16oz
`Quinn's UNSCENTED witch ha
`Quinns Lavender 16oz
`Quinns Lavender 16oz
`Quinns ROSE witch hazel 16o
`Quinns Grapefruit Ora Witch
`Quinns Grapefruit Ora Witch
`Quinn's Mint Cucumber Witch
`Quinn's Cucumber Mint Witch
`Quinn's Mint Cucumber Witch
`Quinns Cactus water WITCH h
`Quinns Cactus water WITCH h
`Quinn's Castile Unscented
`Quinn's TJM Castile Unscente
`Quinn's Castile Unscented 32o
`Quinn's Castile peppermint
`Quinn's TJM Castile peppermi
`Quinns Rose water 8oz
`Quinns Rose water 8oz
`Quinns Rose water 8oz
`Quinns Lavender water 8oz
`Quinns Lavender water 8oz
`Quinns Lavender water 8oz
`Quinns Cucumber Mint water 8
`Quinns Cucumber Mint water 8
`Quinns Cactus water 8oz
`Quinns Cactus water 8oz
`Quinn's Raw Black Castil 32oz
`Quinn's Handwash - Eucalptus
`Quinn's Riose Body Wash 32o
`Quinn's Pink Grape Bodywash
`Quinn's Cuc & mint Bodywash
`Quinns Lip GRT PEP VHMP
`Quinns Lip GRT PEP VHMP
`Quinns LIP VAN EUC COCO
`Quinns LIP VAN EUC CITR
`
`$0.00
`$2,841.40
`$6,697.35
`$0.00
`$10,712.08
`$0.00
`$6,358.32
`$0.00
`$1,302.90
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$24,065.35
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,584.71
`$0.00
`$290.70
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$460.80
`$15,192.14
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$13,019.54
`$460.80
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$3,444.38
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$19,743.84
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$3,340.43
`$0.00
`$2,836.20
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`$12,235.49
`$0.00
`$62,315.46
`$11,796.68
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$24,932.64
`$1,150.22
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$412.41
`$0.00
`$271.63
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$28,665.79
`$14,166.07
`$0.00
`$4,259.32
`$14,166.07
`$589.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$832.36
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`$6,913.11
`$6,268.75
`$30,724.67
`$7,111.87
`$0.00
`$2,898.56
`$12,289.86
`$576.91
`$12,233.71
`$0.00
`$821.70
`$12,223.85
`$751.62
`$2,898.56
`$12,220.05
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$21,456.51
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,470.78
`$0.00
`$181.35
`$5,096.06
`$13,869.41
`$270.01
`$2,350.41
`$6,934.09
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$1,689.60
`$4,219.85
`$6,689.08
`$59,240.35
`$7,093.63
`$1,689.60
`$4,689.42
`$11,907.15
`$393.95
`$11,788.99
`$0.00
`$645.77
`$17,683.49
`$515.46
`$0.00
`$17,683.49
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,615.52
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,993.13
`$0.00
`$936.99
`$5,424.04
`$0.00
`$454.26
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$223.90
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`$3,753.61
`$9,822.73
`$28,854.51
`$5,474.20
`$0.00
`$6,347.22
`$0.00
`$288.43
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$119.09
`$0.00
`$385.85
`$5,658.08
`$0.00
`$4,624.37
`$17,312.71
`$20,446.16
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,362.19
`$0.00
`$1,635.70
`$8,132.70
`$0.00
`$360.89
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$4,588.03
`$13,595.75
`$5,350.69
`$13,595.75
`$1,227.57
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$13,666.60
`$13,666.60
`$13,666.60
`
`$0.00
`$3,721.23
`$4,115.48
`$0.00
`$4,556.90
`$0.00
`$2,469.29
`$0.00
`$149.51
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$181.51
`$1,714.78
`$429.31
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$20,754.35
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,738.43
`$0.00
`-$20.69
`$2,113.54
`$0.00
`$6.76
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,557.33
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$243.31
`$0.00
`$17,756.29
`$17,756.29
`$17,756.30
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`$3,928.85
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$8,314.31
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$701.34
`$0.00
`$5,331.93
`$575.28
`$0.00
`$919.99
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$26,562.00
`$0.00
`$4,055.26
`$2,091.18
`$0.00
`$778.46
`$0.00
`$0.00
`-$123.31
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$300.96
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,073.35
`$1,073.35
`$1,073.35
`
`$0.00
`$9,419.86
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$25,762.10
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,572.69
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,146.97
`$0.00
`$2,277.14
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$73,427.87
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$10,374.88
`$0.00
`$903.35
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$249.03
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,437.64
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`$5,713.38
`$0.00
`$31,589.87
`$6,676.12
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,880.20
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,653.84
`$0.00
`$2,531.76
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$6,141.56
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,055.04
`$0.00
`$1,054.01
`$0.00
`$26,579.65
`$612.72
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$717.56
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$22,943.87
`$0.00
`$22,943.87
`$22,943.84
`
`$44.08
`$8,491.92
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$21,218.39
`$55.65
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,137.95
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,028.63
`$0.00
`$4,679.64
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$40,561.08
`$0.00
`$0.00
`-$5.37
`$0.00
`$1,516.64
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,036.22
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$863.04
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`$85.08
`$8,262.13
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$8,909.10
`$77.99
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,925.82
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,391.87
`$0.00
`$1,024.90
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$1,465.78
`$0.00
`$0.00
`-$117.11
`$0.00
`$1,440.05
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$2,047.55
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$550.58
`$1,975.33
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`$0.00
`
`Page 1
`
`Total
`
`$2,279.56
`$84,692.97
`$33,593.39
`$212,724.86
`$130,644.92
`$2,284.04
`$22,762.81
`$49,129.65
`$18,524.30
`$24,022.70
`$5,331.93
`$10,977.07
`$31,622.12
`$13,787.30
`$8,556.64
`$29,903.54
`$4,624.37
`$17,312.71
`$305,905.81
`$14,166.07
`$4,055.26
`$34,147.61
`$14,166.07
`$12,141.76
`$20,766.34
`$40,449.06
`$6,746.49
`$2,350.41
`$6,934.09
`$6,145.36
`$13,595.75
`$5,350.69
`$13,595.75
`$5,564.56
`$1,975.33
`$17,756.29
`$17,756.29
`$17,756.30
`$22,943.87
`$14,739.95
`$37,683.82
`$37,683.79
`
`

`

`10/08/2020
`8:37:13 AM
`Item #
`
`Item Name
`
`July
`
`August
`
`September
`
`October
`
`November
`
`December
`
`January
`
`February
`
`March
`
`April
`
`May
`
`June
`
`Page 2
`
`Total
`
`
`$54,852.81
`
`
`
`$58,498.13
`
`
`
`$175,793.14
`
`
`
`$160,561.84
`
`
`
`$178,577.67
`
`
`
`$194,936.03
`
`
`
`$96,999.92
`
`
`
`$56,656.30
`
`
`
`$128,571.53
`
`
`
`$157,037.29
`
`
`
`$83,627.87
`
`
`
`$31,039.07
`
`
`
`$1,377,151.60
`
`
`Mano & Mano Pty Ltd
`
`Analyse Sales [Item Spreadsheet]
`
`June 2020
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Marketing Spend- Via Amazon
`
`
`
`