`
`
`
`Sent: 11/25/2017 4:08:04 PM
`
`
`
`To: TTAB EFiling
`
`
`
`CC:
`
`
`
`Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87172791 - SMART SOLUTION - 878389 - Request for
`Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*************************************************
`
`Attachment Information:
`
`Count: 77
`
`Files: 86079319P001OF002.JPG, 86079319P002OF002.JPG, duplicate name 45469
`86079319P001OF002.JPG, duplicate name 45469 86079319P002OF002.JPG, 86075269P001OF005.JPG,
`86075269P002OF005.JPG, 86075269P003OF005.JPG, 86075269P004OF005.JPG,
`86075269P005OF005.JPG, 86270552P001OF003.JPG, 86270552P002OF003.JPG,
`86270552P003OF003.JPG, 86358340P001OF004.JPG, 86358340P002OF004.JPG,
`86358340P003OF004.JPG, 86358340P004OF004.JPG, 86505079P001OF003.JPG,
`86505079P002OF003.JPG, 86505079P003OF003.JPG, 86595238P001OF004.JPG,
`86595238P002OF004.JPG, 86595238P003OF004.JPG, 86595238P004OF004.JPG,
`86622598P001OF003.JPG, 86622598P002OF003.JPG, 86622598P003OF003.JPG,
`86672868P001OF003.JPG, 86672868P002OF003.JPG, 86672868P003OF003.JPG,
`86680061P001OF005.JPG, 86680061P002OF005.JPG, 86680061P003OF005.JPG,
`86680061P004OF005.JPG, 86680061P005OF005.JPG, 86694296P001OF003.JPG,
`86694296P002OF003.JPG, 86694296P003OF003.JPG, 86762542P001OF003.JPG,
`86762542P002OF003.JPG, 86762542P003OF003.JPG, 86773128P001OF004.JPG,
`86773128P002OF004.JPG, 86773128P003OF004.JPG, 86773128P004OF004.JPG,
`86783197P001OF003.JPG, 86783197P002OF003.JPG, 86783197P003OF003.JPG,
`86807880P001OF004.JPG, 86807880P002OF004.JPG, 86807880P003OF004.JPG,
`86807880P004OF004.JPG, 86886032P001OF003.JPG, 86886032P002OF003.JPG,
`86886032P003OF003.JPG, 86920118P001OF003.JPG, 86920118P002OF003.JPG,
`86920118P003OF003.JPG, 86975840P001OF004.JPG, 86975840P002OF004.JPG,
`
`
`
`86975840P003OF004.JPG, 86975840P004OF004.JPG, 86980968P001OF003.JPG,
`86975840P0030F004J PG, 86975840P004OF004.J PG, 86980968P001OF003JPG,
`86980968P002OF003.JPG, 86980968P003OF003.JPG, 87122957P001OF003.JPG,
`86980968P0020F003J PG, 86980968P0030F003.J PG, 87122957P001OF003JPG,
`87122957P002OF003.JPG, 87122957P003OF003.JPG, 87156932P001OF003.JPG,
`87122957P0020F003J PG, 87122957P0030F003.J PG, 87156932P001OF003JPG,
`87156932P002OF003.JPG, 87156932P003OF003.JPG, 87194339P001OF003.JPG,
`87156932P0020F003J PG, 87156932P0030F003J PG, 87194339P001OF003JPG,
`87194339P002OF003.JPG, 87194339P003OF003.JPG, 87268532P001OF003.JPG,
`87194339P0020F003J PG, 87194339P0030F003J PG, 87268532P001OF003JPG,
`87268532P002OF003.JPG, 87268532P003OF003.JPG, 87172791.doc
`87268532P0020F003J PG, 87268532P0030F003J PG, 87172791.doc
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87172791
`
`
`
`MARK: SMART SOLUTION
`
`
`
`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
` LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
`
` ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB
`
` 666 THIRD AVENUE
`
` 10TH FLOOR
`
` NEW YORK, NY 10017-5621
`
`APPLICANT: Medela Holding AG
`
`
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:
`
` 878389
`
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:
`
` fterranella@lawabel.com
`
`
`
`*87172791*
`
`
`
`GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp
`
`
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/25/2017
`
`
`The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is
`denying the request for the reasons stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B),
`715.04(a). The following refusal made final in the Office action dated April 3, 2017 are maintained and
`continue to be final: Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive Refusal regarding Classes 009, 035 and 042. See TMEP
`§§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). The following requirement made final in the Office action are withdrawn:
`clarification of the identification of goods in Classes 009 and 010. See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B),
`715.04(a).
`
`
`
`
`
`In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved all the outstanding issue(s), nor does it raise a
`new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s) in the final
`Office action. In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new
`light on the issues. Accordingly, the request is denied.
`
`
`
`The applicant argues that the term “solution” is not merely descriptive of computer hardware and
`software. To this end, the applicant has submitted registrations whereby the word SOLUTION is not
`disclaimed for computer hardware and/or software. Trademark examining attorneys are not bound by
`the actions of past examining attorneys in prior registrations, even if the registrations have some
`characteristics similar to the application at issue; each case is decided on its own merits. In re
`Manwin/RK Collateral Trust, 111 USPQ2d 1311, 1315 (TTAB 2014) (citing In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236
`F.3d 1339, 1342, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. Cir. 2001)).
`
`
`
`In addition, the attached third party registrations reflect the word “solution” or “solutions” as
`descriptive for computer hardware and software with the wording disclaimed, or the mark on the
`Supplemental Register or Principal Register pursuant to Section 2(f).
`
`
`
`If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the
`Board will be notified to resume the appeal. See TMEP §715.04(a).
`
`
`
`If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action,
`applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any
`outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board. TMEP
`§715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3). The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay
`or extend the time for filing an appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/CarynGlasser/
`
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 105
`
`Phone: (571) 270-1517
`
`Fax: (571) 270-2517
`
`caryn.glasser@uspto.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`