From: Glasser, Caryn
`
`
`
`Sent: 11/25/2017 4:08:04 PM
`
`
`
`To: TTAB EFiling
`
`
`
`CC:
`
`
`
`Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87172791 - SMART SOLUTION - 878389 - Request for
`Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*************************************************
`
`Attachment Information:
`
`Count: 77
`
`Files: 86079319P001OF002.JPG, 86079319P002OF002.JPG, duplicate name 45469
`86079319P001OF002.JPG, duplicate name 45469 86079319P002OF002.JPG, 86075269P001OF005.JPG,
`86075269P002OF005.JPG, 86075269P003OF005.JPG, 86075269P004OF005.JPG,
`86075269P005OF005.JPG, 86270552P001OF003.JPG, 86270552P002OF003.JPG,
`86270552P003OF003.JPG, 86358340P001OF004.JPG, 86358340P002OF004.JPG,
`86358340P003OF004.JPG, 86358340P004OF004.JPG, 86505079P001OF003.JPG,
`86505079P002OF003.JPG, 86505079P003OF003.JPG, 86595238P001OF004.JPG,
`86595238P002OF004.JPG, 86595238P003OF004.JPG, 86595238P004OF004.JPG,
`86622598P001OF003.JPG, 86622598P002OF003.JPG, 86622598P003OF003.JPG,
`86672868P001OF003.JPG, 86672868P002OF003.JPG, 86672868P003OF003.JPG,
`86680061P001OF005.JPG, 86680061P002OF005.JPG, 86680061P003OF005.JPG,
`86680061P004OF005.JPG, 86680061P005OF005.JPG, 86694296P001OF003.JPG,
`86694296P002OF003.JPG, 86694296P003OF003.JPG, 86762542P001OF003.JPG,
`86762542P002OF003.JPG, 86762542P003OF003.JPG, 86773128P001OF004.JPG,
`86773128P002OF004.JPG, 86773128P003OF004.JPG, 86773128P004OF004.JPG,
`86783197P001OF003.JPG, 86783197P002OF003.JPG, 86783197P003OF003.JPG,
`86807880P001OF004.JPG, 86807880P002OF004.JPG, 86807880P003OF004.JPG,
`86807880P004OF004.JPG, 86886032P001OF003.JPG, 86886032P002OF003.JPG,
`86886032P003OF003.JPG, 86920118P001OF003.JPG, 86920118P002OF003.JPG,
`86920118P003OF003.JPG, 86975840P001OF004.JPG, 86975840P002OF004.JPG,
`
`

`

`86975840P003OF004.JPG, 86975840P004OF004.JPG, 86980968P001OF003.JPG,
`86975840P0030F004J PG, 86975840P004OF004.J PG, 86980968P001OF003JPG,
`86980968P002OF003.JPG, 86980968P003OF003.JPG, 87122957P001OF003.JPG,
`86980968P0020F003J PG, 86980968P0030F003.J PG, 87122957P001OF003JPG,
`87122957P002OF003.JPG, 87122957P003OF003.JPG, 87156932P001OF003.JPG,
`87122957P0020F003J PG, 87122957P0030F003.J PG, 87156932P001OF003JPG,
`87156932P002OF003.JPG, 87156932P003OF003.JPG, 87194339P001OF003.JPG,
`87156932P0020F003J PG, 87156932P0030F003J PG, 87194339P001OF003JPG,
`87194339P002OF003.JPG, 87194339P003OF003.JPG, 87268532P001OF003.JPG,
`87194339P0020F003J PG, 87194339P0030F003J PG, 87268532P001OF003JPG,
`87268532P002OF003.JPG, 87268532P003OF003.JPG, 87172791.doc
`87268532P0020F003J PG, 87268532P0030F003J PG, 87172791.doc
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87172791
`
`
`
`MARK: SMART SOLUTION
`
`
`
`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
` LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
`
` ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB
`
` 666 THIRD AVENUE
`
` 10TH FLOOR
`
` NEW YORK, NY 10017-5621
`
`APPLICANT: Medela Holding AG
`
`
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:
`
` 878389
`
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:
`
` fterranella@lawabel.com
`
`
`
`*87172791*
`
`
`
`GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp
`
`
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 11/25/2017
`
`
`The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is
`denying the request for the reasons stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B),
`715.04(a). The following refusal made final in the Office action dated April 3, 2017 are maintained and
`continue to be final: Section 2(e)(1) Descriptive Refusal regarding Classes 009, 035 and 042. See TMEP
`§§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). The following requirement made final in the Office action are withdrawn:
`clarification of the identification of goods in Classes 009 and 010. See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B),
`715.04(a).
`
`
`
`

`

`In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved all the outstanding issue(s), nor does it raise a
`new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s) in the final
`Office action. In addition, applicant’s analysis and arguments are not persuasive nor do they shed new
`light on the issues. Accordingly, the request is denied.
`
`
`
`The applicant argues that the term “solution” is not merely descriptive of computer hardware and
`software. To this end, the applicant has submitted registrations whereby the word SOLUTION is not
`disclaimed for computer hardware and/or software. Trademark examining attorneys are not bound by
`the actions of past examining attorneys in prior registrations, even if the registrations have some
`characteristics similar to the application at issue; each case is decided on its own merits. In re
`Manwin/RK Collateral Trust, 111 USPQ2d 1311, 1315 (TTAB 2014) (citing In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236
`F.3d 1339, 1342, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. Cir. 2001)).
`
`
`
`In addition, the attached third party registrations reflect the word “solution” or “solutions” as
`descriptive for computer hardware and software with the wording disclaimed, or the mark on the
`Supplemental Register or Principal Register pursuant to Section 2(f).
`
`
`
`If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the
`Board will be notified to resume the appeal. See TMEP §715.04(a).
`
`
`
`If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action,
`applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any
`outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board. TMEP
`§715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3). The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay
`or extend the time for filing an appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/CarynGlasser/
`
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 105
`
`Phone: (571) 270-1517
`
`Fax: (571) 270-2517
`
`caryn.glasser@uspto.gov
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket