throbber
BULKY
`
`DOCUMENT
`
`(FILED ON PAPER —— ENTIRE DOCUMENT EXCEEDS 100 PAGES)
`
`86416038
`
`Filing Date
`
`07/06/2015
`
`1of
`
`8641 6038
`
`

`
`'
`
`TTAB
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TILADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`GLOCK, INC.,
`
`Applicant.
`
`RE_(_ QUEST FOR SUSPENSION
`
`The application of Glock, Inc. for trademarks G17 and G18 should be suspended because
`
`there is an underlying trademark and patent infringement lawsuit against opposer The Wuster
`
`currently pending in the Northern District of Georgia (Case No. 2:14-cv-00568-AT, the
`
`“underlying lawsuit”) which, as Glock itself has acknowledged, covers issues “including but not
`
`limited to, the G17 trademark.” (Applicant’s March 16, 2015 Request for Reconsideration).
`
`The complaint in the underlying lawsuit, attached hereto with selected relevant exhibits
`
`as Attachment A, specifically alleges that The Wuster’s G17 gun is an unauthorized and
`
`unlicensed use of Glock’s trade mark and dress and includes exhibits regarding the allegedly
`
`infringing G17 model. (See Attachment A, complaint paragraphs 52, 78 and Exhibits A (partial),
`
`F-I, H-2). The complaint also alleges violations of Glock’s trade dress in relation to the G18
`
`model. (See Attachment A, complaint paragraph 54 and Exhibits A (partial), F—3).
`
`lllllll||||ll||||||||||||||||||||||l|||||||||||||||||||||l||
`07-06-2015
`U 5‘ Patent 3. TMOl'Er'TM Mall Rent Dt #
`
`1
`
`In the matter of Serial No. 86416038
`
`Date of Publication: March 3, 2015
`For the marks: G17 and G18
`
`KENT WU AND THE WUSTER,
`
`Opposer,
`
`Application Serial No. 8641603 8
`
`

`
`Attachment A shows that there is an ongoing court proceeding which likely will affect
`
`the registrability of G17 and G18. Thus, primafacie good cause exists to suspend Glock’s
`
`application pending resolution of the underlying lawsuit. (See 37 C.F.R. § 2.67 (“The fact that a
`
`proceeding is pending before .
`
`.
`
`. a court which is relevant to the issue of registrability of the
`
`applicant’s mark[] .
`
`.
`
`. will be considered prima facie good and sufficient cause[]” to suspend the
`
`action); see generally 37 C.F.R. §2.l l7(a) (“Whenever it shall come to the attention of the
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that a party or parties to a pending case are engaged in a civil
`
`action or another Board proceeding which may have a bearing on the case, proceedings before
`
`the Board may be suspended until termination of the civil action or the other Board
`
`proceeding.”)).
`
`We note that another separate but related proceeding, Glock’s Petition for Cancellation of
`
`the G19 mark (No. 92061240, filed April 9, 2015), was suspended pending further review and
`
`briefing by the parties by Interlocutory Attorney Elizabeth Dunn on June 26, 2015, after the
`
`undersigned raised similar concerns about overlapping factual issues between the underlying
`
`lawsuit and the cancellation petition in relation to the G19 mark. Moreover, although settlement
`
`discussions may not have occurred yet regarding the issues pending before the Trademark Trial
`
`and Appeal Board, The Wuster has indeed engaged in settlement discussions with Glock
`
`regarding the underlying lawsuit. Although the overlapping facts between the underlying lawsuit
`
`and Glock’s application would be sufficient grounds to grant The Wuster’s request for extension
`
`of time, by this motion The Wuster instead seeks to suspend the application entirely.
`
`

`
`For the foregoing reasons, The Wuster respectfully requests Glock’s application
`
`regarding G17 and G18 be suspended until the issues in the underlying lawsuit regarding G17-
`
`and G18 are resolved.
`
`Dated this
`
`day of July, 2015.
`
`
`
`PAUL S. MARKS, State Bar No. 138407
`NEUFELD MARKS
`315 W. 9”‘ Street, Suite 501
`Los Angeles, California 90015
`Telephone: (213) 625-2625
`Facsimile: (213) 625-2650
`
`Attorneys for Opposer Kent Wu and The Wuster
`
`

`
`{I
`
`\A
`
`

`
`Attachment A
`
`

`
`4|
`
`1*
`
`Case :L':L4~cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 47
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ROME DIVISION
`
`GLOCK, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KENT DE—HUI WU a/k/a KENT WU a/k/a
`KEAT D. WU a/k/a KENNETH WU a/k/a
`3
`KENNETH WILSON, MAY-FONG CI-IU
`a/k/aMAYCHU a/k/aMAYFUNCHU
`a/k/a MIAN CHU a/k/a MAY SCHWARZ,
`THE WUSTER, DA WUSTER INC., DA
`WUSTER CORR, WUSTER &. CHEWY
`LLC (California), WUSTER & CHEWY
`LLC (Washington), THE WUSTER INC.,
`XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, and ABC
`LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 1-10,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`-.J\/vggg/\/\./\/\z\_4\guu\./\../\./\/\./\.J Civil Action No.: 1:1u:v—5ss.mr
`
`COMPLQINT
`
`COMES NOW Plaintiff, GLOCK, Inc. (“GLOCK”) by and through its
`
`attorneys, Miller & Martin, PLLC, for its Complaint against Defendants alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`|l806982vl
`
`

`
`l
`
`H
`
`Case 1:14—cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/2611-4 Page 2 of 47
`
`_1fARf]]__!§S
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff GLOCK is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state of Georgia with its principal place of business at 6000 Highlands
`
`Parkway, Smyrna, GA 30082.
`
`2.
`
`Kent De-Hui Wu a/k/a Kent Wu a/k/a’ Keat D. Wu a/k/a Kenneth Wu
`
`a/k/a Kenneth Wilson (“Wu”) is a citizen ofthe state of California.
`
`3.
`
`May—Fong Chu a/Ida May Chu a/k/a May Fun Chu, a/k./a Mian Chu
`
`a/k/a May Schwarz (“Chu”) is a citizen ofthe state of California.
`
`4.
`
`Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplatcom.
`
`5. Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplat Los Angeles, located at 3809
`
`Durbin Street, Irwindale, CA 91706.
`
`6.
`
`Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplat Seattle,
`
`located at
`
`I20
`
`Andover Park E # 150‘, Seattle, WA 98188 (AirSplat.com, Airsplat Los Angeles
`
`and Airsplat Seattle are hereinafter collectively referred to as “AirSp1at”).
`
`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, Wu and Chu have created an elaborate
`
`system of corporate entities designed to conceal their ownership and operation of
`
`Airsplat.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant The Wuster is a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in California.
`
`1 l8D6982v1
`
`

`
`l
`
`l
`
`Case 1:.14«-CV-O0568—AT Document 1 Filed O2/26114 Page 3 of 47
`
`9.
`
`Defendant Da Wuster Inc. was a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in
`
`California.
`
`10. Defendant Wustcr & Chewy LLC (California) was a limited liability
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the state of Califomia with its
`
`principal place ofbusiness in California.
`
`11. Defendant Wuster & Chewy LLC (Washington) is a limited liability
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the state of Washington, with its
`
`principal place of business in Washington.
`
`12. Defendant The Wustcr Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the state of Washington with its principal place of business in
`
`Washington.
`
`13. Da Wuster Corp is‘ a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state ofNevada, with its principal place of business in Nevada.
`
`14. XYZ Corporations 1-10 are additional coxporations that Wu and Chu
`
`have created to conceal their ownership and operation of Airsplat, the identities of
`
`which are currently unknown to Plaintiff.
`
`ll8069B2vl
`
`

`
`l
`
`l
`
`Case 1:14~cv-00568-AT Document 1 -Filed 02/26/14 Page 4 of 47
`
`15. ABC Limited Liability Companies 1-10 are additional limited liability
`
`companies that Wu and Chu have created to conceal their ownership and operation
`
`of Airsplat, the identities ofwhich are currently unknown to Plaintiff.
`
`16. Wu and Chu are corporate ofiicers of the limited liability company
`
`defendants.
`
`17. Defendants The Wuster, Da Wuster Inc., Wuster & Chewy LLC
`
`(California), Wuster & Chewy LLC (Washington), The Wuster Inc., Da Wuster
`
`Corp, XYZ Corporations 1-10, and ABC Limited Liability Companies 1-10 are
`
`hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Airsplat Corporate Entities.”
`
`18.
`
`In marketing, selling, importing and distributing GLOCK Replicas (as
`
`hereinafter defined)
`
`into the United States,
`
`including the State of Georgia,
`
`Defendants have committed unlawful acts, including, but not limited to, patent
`
`infringement, federal trade dress infringement, federal trademark infringement,
`
`federal false designation of origin and false advertising, federal dilution, common
`
`law trade dress and trademark infringement, unfair competition, deceptive trade
`
`practices, and unjust enrichment, disgorgemcnt and constructive trust as more fiilly
`
`set forth herein within the Northern District of Georgia.
`
`1 l8D6982v 1'
`
`

`
`Case 1:14~cv-00568-AT Document 1 Ffled 02/26I14 Page 5 of 47
`
`JURISDICTION AND ZQQQ
`
`19.
`
`This is an action for injunctive relief, damages, treble damages and an
`
`award for attorneys’ fees for infringement of a patent issued by the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO") under 35 U.S.C. §«271, et. seq.
`
`20.
`
`This is also an action for injunctive relief, damages, treble damages
`
`and an award for attorneys’
`
`fees
`
`for
`
`infiingement of federal
`
`trade dress’
`
`registrations and federal trademark registrations under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a);
`
`trade dress infiingement and unfair competition under Section 43 (a) of the Lanham
`
`Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); trademark infringement and unfiir competition under
`
`Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,_ 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); dilution of a famous trade
`
`dress under Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § _1125(c); dilution of a
`
`famous trademark under Section 43(c) ofthe Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § i12S(c); for
`
`deceptive trade practices in violation of the Georgia Deceptive Trade Practices
`
`Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370, er. seq. for unfair competition in violation of Georgia
`
`Unfair Competition Statute, 0.C.G.A- § 23-2-55, et. seq. for unfair competition in
`
`violation of common law; and for unjust enrichment, disgorgement and
`
`constructive trust in violation of common law.
`
`21.
`
`This Court has
`
`subject matter
`
`jurisdiction over
`
`the patent
`
`infringement,
`
`trade
`
`dress
`
`infringement,
`
`trademark
`
`infringement,
`
`unfair
`
`tl806982v1
`
`

`
`Case 1:14—cv~O0568—AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 6 of 47
`
`competition, false designation of origin and false advertising, and dilution pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1338.
`
`22.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the state and common
`
`law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l332(a)(l) because there is complete diversity
`
`of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendants and the amount in controversy
`
`exceeds $75,000 exclusive of interest and costs, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1367(3).
`
`23.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants pursuant to
`
`the provisions of the Georgia Long Arm Statute, O.C.G.A. § 9~10-91.
`
`24. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1391 and § 14000;).
`
`mars COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`25.
`
`In 1982, Gaston Glock developed the first commercially successful
`
`polymer—frame semi-automatic pistol, the GLOCK 17. It has been well publicized
`
`that the GLOCK 17 was regarded as a radically new design in virtually every
`
`respect It revolutionized the industry. The new, unique appearance of the GLOCK
`
`17 featured an external design and image that was a significant departure from the
`
`1 l806982v1
`
`

`
`Case 1:14»-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 7 of 47
`
`traditional metal design widely used over the last century by other pistol
`
`manufacturers, such as Smith & Wesson, Heckler & Koch and Colt.
`
`26. GLOCK was formed in 1985 to assemble and market the GLOCK 17
`
`in the United States. Subsequently, Gaston Glock developed a complete family of
`
`GLOCK pistols, including the Model 17L, Model 18, Model 19, Model 20, Model
`
`21, Model 22, Model 23, Model 24, Model 25, Model 26, Model 27, Model 2.8,
`
`Model 29, Model 30, Model 31, Model 32, Model 33, Model 34, Model 35, Model
`
`36, Model 37, Model 38, Model 39., Model 41, and Model 42. The family of
`
`polyme1‘—framc pistols is herein collectively referred to as the “GLOCK pistols.”
`
`Despite some initial skepticism from gun traditionalists,
`
`the GLOCK. pistols
`
`became enormously successful in the United States, with consumers and especially
`
`with law enforcement agencies. By 1991, more than 3,500 Federal, State and local
`
`law enforcement agencies and departments in the United States had adopted or
`
`approved GLOCK pistols for duty use. By 1996, GLOCK captured over one half
`
`of the United States law enforcement handgun market. GLOCK pistols are
`
`presently used by over sixty-five percent (65%) of Federal, State and local law
`
`enforcement agencies across the Country,
`
`including the Federal Bureau of
`
`Investigation, Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
`
`I l8D6982vl
`
`

`
`Case 1:14~cv—00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Rage 8 of 47
`
`27. Gaston Glock’s original design and concept for the GLOCK 17 has
`
`stayed virtually intact for the entire line of GLOCK pistols since ‘creation. All of
`
`the various GLOCK pistols share the same distinctive design and appearance as the
`
`original Model 17.
`
`23. GLOCK pistols feature a distinctive appearance and overall image,
`
`which represents a significant departure from the traditional pistol designs used by
`
`other pistol manufacturers. GLOCK pistols include a polymer-frame with a slide
`
`top lever built flush into one side of the flame and a small slide lock positioned in
`
`an angled groove on both sides of the flame above the trigger. The slide and the
`
`upper part of the polymer-firame on GLOCK pistols have a distinctive blocky and
`
`squared-off shape, with polymer sights carrying a white dot on the top of the slide
`
`and serrations on each side of the rear portion of the slide. The serial number plate
`
`is embedded on the underside of the front part of the frame. The interface between
`
`the slide and the frame on GLOCK pistols includes a distinctive gap. The bottom
`
`portion of the frame includes both the handgrip and trigger guard. The handgrip of
`
`GLOCK pistols includes distinctive. serrations on the front and rear faces and both
`
`sides of a GLOCK pistol handgrip are slightly raised and textured. The front face
`ofthe handgrip includes two raised fnger ridges. At the transition between the rear
`
`of the gun and the handgrip is a slightly projecting down-turned lip. The nigger
`
`ll806982vl
`
`

`
`(ll
`
`Case 1:14—cv~Op0568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 9 of 4?
`
`guard of a GLOCK pistol is also a blocky and squared~off shape with distinctive
`
`serrations on the front face. This previously unknown selection of non-functional
`
`design elements present an inherently distinctive appearance and have acquired
`
`secondary meaning. True and correct copies of photographs of select GLOCK
`
`model pistols are attached as Eghigit A.
`
`GLOCK T
`
`E D
`
`S
`
`29.
`
`The trade dress of GLOCK pistols has acquired a substantial level of
`
`source identifying capability-, i.e., secondary meaning. ‘This secondary meaning is
`
`the result of, among other things, the widespread popularity and use of GLOCK
`
`pistols by law enforcement agencies and civilians throughout the United States,
`
`GLOCK’s extensive marketing and promotional efforts, and extensive third-party
`
`publicity.
`
`30. GLOCK is the owner of a federal trademark registration for its trade
`
`dress in International Class 13, Reg. No. 2,807,747 registered on January 27, 2004
`
`by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). A true and correct
`
`copy of the registration is attached as Exhihit Q. The description of the mark is as
`
`follows:
`
`The mark consists of the three dimensional overall
`configuration of a semi—automatic pistol having a blocky
`an[d] squared—off shape as viewed from the side, the
`front, and the rear. The vertical lines at the rear of the
`
`ll806982vl
`
`9
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-0O568—AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 10 of 47
`
`slide indicate ridges. The stippling is a feature of the
`mark and not intended to indicate color. The dotted lines
`indicate features that are not claimed as a part of the
`mark. Neither the shape of the notch on the rear sight nor
`the circular shape of the interior of the barrel are claimed
`as a part of the mark. The shape of the trigger guard and
`the shape, location, and position of the trigger safety tab
`are claimed as a part of the mark, but no claim is made to
`the shape of the trigger separate from the trigger safety
`tab.
`.
`
`Reg. No. 2,807,747 is incontestable pursuant to Section 15 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. §1065 and therefore, GLOCK. has the exclusive right to use its trade dress.
`
`GLOCK also holds a second incontestable trade dress registration, Reg. No.
`
`2,807,745.
`
`31. Acceptance of GLOCK pistols in the marketplace was immediate, and
`
`sales of GLOCK pistols have continued to grow since their introduction. GLOCK
`
`has promoted the sale of its pistols by extensive advertising in newspapers and
`
`magazines as well as through appearances at
`
`trade shows and other events
`
`throughout the United States. Newspapers and magazines throughout the United
`
`States have included feature articles about the GLOCK pistols, and such pistols
`
`have been generally recognized in the press as the leading polymer-frame semi-
`
`automatic pistol
`
`in the worldwide market. Such articles have featured the
`
`distinctive appearance and the unique operation of GLOCK pistols. True and
`
`l l806982vl
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv~O0568~AT Document 1 Filed 02I26l14 Page 11 of 47
`
`correct copies of articles featuring or discussing GLOCK pistols from several
`
`leading handgun magazines are attached as Exhib;§' c-1-cg.
`
`32. Another form of third-party publicity of GLOCK pistols has been in
`
`television and movies. For example, GLOCK pistols have been featured in movie
`
`productions such as INCEPTION, THE TOWN, THE FUGITIVE, DIE HARD II,
`
`BAD BOYS 1], and TRUE LIES, and television, productions such as THE
`
`SOPRANOS, 24, X-FILES, NYPD BLUE, cs1,
`
`IUSTIFIED and LAW &
`
`ORDER. Hundreds of instances of use of GLOCK pistols in film, television and
`
`video games have been compiled on the Internet Movie Firearm Database available
`
`at http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Glock. Such widespread publicity has contributed to
`
`GLOCK pistols being among the most recognizable pistols in the world.
`
`33. GLOCK has developed valuable goodwill in the trade dress of the
`
`GLOCK pistols, and the relevant public, including the public within the Northern
`
`District of Georgia, have come to know, recognize and identify the distinctive look
`
`and appearance of a pistol originating fi~om GLOCK.
`
`34. As a result of extensive sales, marking and promotion by GLOCK and
`
`others, the trade dress of the GLOCK pistol has become world famous.
`
`35. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants the authority,
`
`permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or sell a pistol that
`
`ll806982vl
`
`l l
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-005.68-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 12 of 47
`
`copies or otherwise utilizes the trade dress of the GLOCK pistol or that resembles
`
`a GLOCK pistol.
`
`§LOCK’S TRADE
`
`36.
`
`In addition to its world famous trade dress, Plaintifi‘ GLOCK holds
`
`several incontestable and world famous trademarks for its GLOCK logo, including
`
`the mark
`
`“GLOCK”
`
`(Reg. No.
`
`1,691,390),
`
`and the mark “GLOCK
`
`PERFECTION” (Reg. No. 2,440,268). True and correct copy of Trademark Reg.
`
`No. 1,691,390 and Reg. No. 2,440,268 are attached as Exhipit_§ D-1 - D-2.
`
`37. On February 4, 1986, Plaintiff obtained a trademark registration (Reg.
`
`No. 1,381,064) for its GLOCK logo in IC 008 for “hand-held tools, cutlery, and
`
`hand—he1d weapons, particularly spades, knives and bayoncts,” and IC 013 for '
`
`“ammunition and bullets, explosives, fireworks, and hand—grcnades.” A true and
`
`correct copy of Trademark Reg. No. 1,3 81,064 is attached as Exhigit D—3.
`
`38. On October 1}, 2011, Plaintiff obtained a trademark registration (Reg.
`
`No. 4,03 8,822) for its GLOCK logo in IC 013 for “airsoft guns.” A true and correct
`
`copy of Trademark Reg. No. 4,038,822 is attached as
`
`39. On September 11, 2012, Plainfifi obtained a trademark registration
`(Reg. No. 4,204,831), “Gen 4” in 10 013 for “firearms.” A true and correct copy of
`
`Trademark Reg. No. 4,204,83lis attached as Exhibit D-5.
`
`1 180698.’-!v1
`
`12
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv—D0568-AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 13 of 47
`
`40.
`
`The trademarks for the GLOCK logo as well as for “Gen 4,” are
`
`inherently distinctive, have achieved secondary meaning and enjoy global fame.
`
`41. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants the authority,
`
`permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or sell a pistol that
`
`copies or otherwise utilizes the GLOCK’s trademarks.
`
`GLQCICS ‘677 PATENT
`
`42.
`
`Separate and apart from GLOCK’s world famous trade dress and
`
`trademarks, Gaston Glock is also recognized as an innovator in the field of firearm
`
`accessories, and has invented several patents for firearm accessories,
`
`including
`
`baekstrap assemblies.
`
`43. On April 17, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,156,677 (“‘677 Patent”
`
`or “patent-in-suit”) was duly issued to Plaintiff by the USPTO for ASSEMBLIES
`
`AND FIREARMS INCORPORATING SUCH ASSEMBLIES after a full and fair
`
`examination for backstrap assemblies and firearms incorporating such assemblies
`
`to provide a wide range of solid grips for fireanns, which was filed on April 15,
`
`2010. A true and correct copy of ‘677 Patent is attached as Exhm; E.
`
`44.
`
`The ‘677 Patent enables marksman to selectively mount and elongate
`
`removable backstrap to a grip of the firearm to effectively increase the size of the
`
`grip-
`
`l 1806982!/l
`
`

`
`Case 1:14~cv—00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02I26l14 Page 14 of 47
`
`45.
`
`The ‘677 Patent uses a trigger housing pin to secure the backstrap to
`
`the trigger mechanism housing and the receiver ofthe firearm.
`
`46.
`
`Plaintifi‘ is and at all times relevant has been, the patentee and lawful
`
`owner ofthe ‘677 Patent and possesses all substantive rights and rights ofrecovery
`
`under the ‘677 Patent, including the right to sue for infringement and recover past
`
`damages.
`
`47.
`
`The ‘677 Patent is valid and enforceable up to its expiration on April
`
`15, 2030.
`
`48. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants Airsplat Corporate
`
`Entities the authority, permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or
`
`sell a pistol that copies or otherwise utilizes the ‘677 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`The backstrap assembly that is the subject of the ‘677 Patent is a
`
`firearm accessory, and is
`
`separate and apart
`
`from GLOCK’s trade dress
`
`registrations described herein.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ ACTIVITIES
`
`50. Defendants Airsplat Corporate Entities claim to be the “Nation’s
`
`Largest Airsofi Retailer” and own and operate an Internet retail store for airsoft
`
`guns at mmgygggflz, through which they market and sell various airsofl; guns
`
`and related products throughout the United States, including in this judicial district.
`
`ttsosmvt
`
`14
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv—0056B-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 15 of 47
`
`DEFENDANTS’ LEAUTHORIZED A32 gflrclzusnn USE on
`G ggrgg 134312: nggss
`
`51. Airsoft guns fire non-metallic pellets for use in simulated combat and
`
`similar recreational sport. They are subject to federal regulation as “look-alike
`
`firearms” pursuant to 15 C.F.R. Part 1150, as well as to regulation by many states
`
`and municipalities.
`
`52. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 17 (“GLOCK 17
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhigg’ ‘K-1: (1) WE
`
`G17 Airsofi Gas Blowbaok Gun Tan; (2) WE G17 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol; (3) WinGun 104 G17 Gas Airsofi Gun Pistol; (4) HFC G17 Spring Airsofl
`
`Gun Pistol; (5) HFC G17 Black/Silver Spring Airsolt Gun; (6) HFC G17 Gas
`
`Blowback Airsott Gun Pistol; (7) KSC G17 Gas Airsofi Blowback Gun Pistol OD;
`
`(8) UHC G17 Spring Airsoft Pistol Black; (9) Army G17 Meister METAL Gas
`
`Airsoft Gun; (10) KWA ATP Airsoft Gas Blowback Gun Pistol; (11) KWA ATP
`
`Full Auto Gas Blowback Pistol; and (I2) KWC G17 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol.
`
`53. Among the airsoit guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 17L (“GLOCK 17L
`
`Replicas”), including the following aizsofl guns shown on : (1) HFC
`
`1 lsossszvi
`
`1 5
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226114 Page 16 of 47
`
`G17L G34 Spring Airsoft Gun BS; and (2) HFC G17L G34 Spring Airsofi Gun
`
`Black.
`
`54. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCKL Model 18 (“GLOCK 18
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsofl guns shown on Exhibit §—§: (1) CYMA
`
`G180 Airsoit Spring Gun Pistol ZM17; (2) WE G18C Auto Airsott Gas Blowback
`
`Gun; (3) WE G18C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Tan; (4) Eohol Timberwolf
`
`Ah-soft Gas GBB Gun Tan; (5)Echo1 TimbcrwolfAirsofi Gas GBB Gun BLK; (6)
`
`APS C02 Action Combat Airsoft Pistol; (7) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol
`
`Nomad; (8) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol Mandrake; (9) APS ACP Custom
`
`Camo CO2 Pistol MCam; (10) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol Highland;
`
`(11) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol ATC FG; (12) APS ACP Custom Camo
`
`CO2 Pistol ATC TN; and (13) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Typhon.
`
`55. Among the airsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 19 (“GLOCK 19
`
`Replicas”), including the: following airsofl guns shown on : (1) KSC
`
`G19 Gas Airsoft Blowback Gun Pistol; (2) WE G19 Ainsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol; (3) WE G19 Airsofi Gas Blowbaok Gun Tan; (4) Echo] Tunbérwolf Airsofi
`
`Gas GBB Gun Tan; (5) Echol Timberwolf Airsofl Gas GBB Gun BLK; (6) APS
`
`ll806982vl
`
`16
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Fiied 02/261314 Page 17 of 47
`
`CO2 Action Combat Airsofi Pistol; (7) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol
`
`Nomad; (8) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Mandrake; (9) APS ACP Custom
`
`Camo CO2 Pistol MCam; (10) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Highland; (11)
`
`APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol ATC FG; (12) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2
`
`Pistol ATC TN; and (.13) APS ACP Custom Camo coz Pistol Typhon.
`
`56. Among the airsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 23 (“GLOCK 23
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhibit F-5: (1) KJW
`
`G23 METAL Gas Aitsofi Gun Pistol OD; (2) KSC/KWA ATP G23F Full Auto
`
`Gas Airsofi Blowback; (3) KJW G23 METAL Gas Blowback Airsofi Gun; (4)
`
`KJW G230 METAL Gas Airsofc Gun GBB QD; (5) KJW G230 METAL Gas
`
`Blowback Airsoft Gun; (6) WE G23C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Tan; and (7) WE
`
`G23C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Black.
`
`57. Among the airsoft guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 26 (“GLOCK 26
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhibit F-6: (1) CYMA
`
`Boy G26 Spring Airsofl Gun Pistol; (2) I-IFC G26 Spring Airsoft Gun Pistol Black;
`
`(3) HFC G26 Spring Ajrsoft Gun Pistol Silver; (4) HFC G26 METAL Airsoft Gas
`
`l I 806982vl
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 18 of 47
`
`BB Gun Pistol; (5) KSC G26C Full Auto Metal Gas Gun; (6) WE G26 Airsofi Gas
`
`Blowback Gun Black; and (7) WE G26 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gim Tan.
`
`58. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies ofthe GLOCK Model 30 (“GLOCK 30 Replicas”)
`
`including the following airsofc gun shown on : CYMA P698 G30.
`
`Spxing Airsoft Gun Pistol.
`
`59. Among the airsoft guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 33 (“GLOCK 33 Replica”)
`
`including the following aixsofi guns shown on Exhibit F—8: (1) WE G33 Advance
`
`Gas Blowback Pistol Black; and (2) WE G33 Advance Gas Blowback Pistol Tan.
`
`60. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 34 (“GLOCK 34 Replicas”)
`
`including the following aixsoft guns shown on Exhibit E9: (1) WE G34 Airsofi
`
`Gas Blowback Gun Pistol; (2) HFC G171. G34 Spring Airsofc Gun BS; and (3)
`
`HFC G17L G34 Spring Airsoft Gun Black.
`
`61. Among the aixsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 35 (“GLOCK 35 Replicas”)
`
`including the following aixsott gun shown on : WE G35 Auto Airsofi
`
`Gas Blowback Gun.
`
`1 l306982v I
`
`

`
`Case1:14—cv—00568-AT Documentl Filed 02/26/14 Page 19 of 47 V
`
`62.
`
`Each of the GLOCK Replicas shown on Exhibit; F-1 to F-10 uses a
`
`product name that includes either G17, G17L, G18, G19, G23, G26, G30, G33,
`
`G34 or G35, which in each case corresponds to the specific model of the GLOCK
`
`pistol that is being copied.
`
`63. On their website, as shown on Exhibit Q1, Defendants state that:
`
`“Generally speaking, most of the more popular real-steel firearms has an
`Airsofi gun counterpart... Pistols such as the famed Berettas, Colts, SIGs,
`and Glocks... The list of Airsoit guns is quite sizeable, and growing with
`each passing month.”
`
`64.
`
`For several of the GLGCK Replicas shown on Exhibits F--] to F-10,
`
`AirSp1at includes product descriptions which either allude to, or expressly refer to,
`
`the world famous GLOCK pistols, including the following for the HFC G17 Spring
`
`Airsoft Gun Pistol:
`
`“The G17 is one of the most highly regarded pistols in the world. This spring
`replica captures the look and feel of the world famous pistol. The HFC G17
`is weighted to nearly match the exact weight of the actual thing. The locking
`slide will alert you when your magazine is empty, just like the real thing!"
`
`65.
`
`On their website, Defendants state: “The main concern surrounding
`
`airsoft gun safety is the realistic nature of the weapons themselves. Aiisofi guns
`
`are exact replicas of lethal firearms in both appearance and weight... [A]irsofi guns
`
`can easily be mistaken for real firearms,” as shown on Exhipit Q~2.
`
`I l806982vl
`
`

`
`Case 1:14—cv—OU56B—AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 20 of 47
`
`66. Defendants offer and sell several models of airsofi guns under licenses
`
`fiom the manufacturers ofthe actual firearms which are being copied, including for
`
`example, an airsofr copy of the Colt 1911 pistol, SIG 552 Commando AEG Gun
`
`Tan and Walter P99 CO2 Blowback Pistol as shown on Exhibit Q-g, Eggjplt G-4
`
`and Exhibit G-5, but has no license fiom GLOCK to make, use, offer for sale, or
`
`sell any ofthe GLOCK Replicas.
`
`67. On their website, Defendants tout that they have supplied airsofi
`
`pistols for use in films and television shows as stand-ins for the firearms fiom
`
`which they are copied, including several of the GLOCK Replicas, as shown on
`
`Eghibit G-6.
`
`R
`
`68.
`
`On their website, as shown on Exhibit G-6, Defendants state that:
`
`“Often, people would watch movies and TV and say, "Wow, that gun is
`awesome, I'd like to get me one of those". Actually, what you may be seeing
`in those movies and TV shows, ARE, in fact, Airsofi guns. Due to their
`relatively cheap price tags and precise realism, movie studios often employ
`Airsoft guns for it's production work. They simply digitally alter the images
`to incorporate the muzzle flash, sound and effects to mimic the real
`firearms.”
`
`69. Airsplat
`
`resellers, and reviewers of Airsplat products, describe
`
`GLOCK Replicas as copies of the world famous GLOCK pistols, examples of
`
`which are attached as
`
`l l806982vl
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 21 of 47
`
`70. On another website, as shown on Exhibit (3-8, one reviewer of the
`
`KJW G23 METAL Gas Blowback Airsoit Gtm states that: “this is the best glock i
`
`[sic] have ever shot.”
`
`71. Upon information and belief, Defmdant Wu,
`
`the Chief Executive
`
`Officer, President and Founder of the Airsplnt Corporate Entities, knew that one or
`
`more of the GLOCK. Replicas referenced herein were unlicensed and unauthorized
`
`copies of the world famous GLOCK pistols and were being marketed by the
`
`Airsplat Corporate Entities in a manner intended to cause market confusion and in
`
`violation of GLOCK’s registered trade dress and legally protected rights.
`
`72. Defendant Wu was a moving, active and conscious force behind the
`
`unlawful advertising and sales activities described herein.
`
`73. Upon information and belief, Defendant Chu, the Vice President of
`
`the AirSplat Corporate Entities, knew that one or more of the GLOCK Replicas
`
`referenced herein were unlicensed and unauthorized copies of the world famous
`
`GLOCK pistols and were being marketed by the Airsplat Corporate Entities in a
`
`manner intended to cause market confusion and in violation of GLOCK’s
`
`registered trade dress and legally protected rights.
`
`74. Defendant Chu was a moving, active and conscious force behind the
`
`unlawful advertising and’ sales activities described herein.
`
`1 i8Dli982vl
`
`21
`
`

`
`~|
`
`H
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 22 of 47
`
`UNLICENSED Ufifl OF
`DEFENDANTS’ UNAUTHORIZED
`GLOCK’§ TRADEMARICS
`
`75. Defendants advertise and offer for sale numerous GLOCK Replicas
`
`that utilize GLOCK’s registered trademarks.
`
`7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket