`
`DOCUMENT
`
`(FILED ON PAPER —— ENTIRE DOCUMENT EXCEEDS 100 PAGES)
`
`86416038
`
`Filing Date
`
`07/06/2015
`
`1of
`
`8641 6038
`
`
`
`'
`
`TTAB
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TILADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`GLOCK, INC.,
`
`Applicant.
`
`RE_(_ QUEST FOR SUSPENSION
`
`The application of Glock, Inc. for trademarks G17 and G18 should be suspended because
`
`there is an underlying trademark and patent infringement lawsuit against opposer The Wuster
`
`currently pending in the Northern District of Georgia (Case No. 2:14-cv-00568-AT, the
`
`“underlying lawsuit”) which, as Glock itself has acknowledged, covers issues “including but not
`
`limited to, the G17 trademark.” (Applicant’s March 16, 2015 Request for Reconsideration).
`
`The complaint in the underlying lawsuit, attached hereto with selected relevant exhibits
`
`as Attachment A, specifically alleges that The Wuster’s G17 gun is an unauthorized and
`
`unlicensed use of Glock’s trade mark and dress and includes exhibits regarding the allegedly
`
`infringing G17 model. (See Attachment A, complaint paragraphs 52, 78 and Exhibits A (partial),
`
`F-I, H-2). The complaint also alleges violations of Glock’s trade dress in relation to the G18
`
`model. (See Attachment A, complaint paragraph 54 and Exhibits A (partial), F—3).
`
`lllllll||||ll||||||||||||||||||||||l|||||||||||||||||||||l||
`07-06-2015
`U 5‘ Patent 3. TMOl'Er'TM Mall Rent Dt #
`
`1
`
`In the matter of Serial No. 86416038
`
`Date of Publication: March 3, 2015
`For the marks: G17 and G18
`
`KENT WU AND THE WUSTER,
`
`Opposer,
`
`Application Serial No. 8641603 8
`
`
`
`Attachment A shows that there is an ongoing court proceeding which likely will affect
`
`the registrability of G17 and G18. Thus, primafacie good cause exists to suspend Glock’s
`
`application pending resolution of the underlying lawsuit. (See 37 C.F.R. § 2.67 (“The fact that a
`
`proceeding is pending before .
`
`.
`
`. a court which is relevant to the issue of registrability of the
`
`applicant’s mark[] .
`
`.
`
`. will be considered prima facie good and sufficient cause[]” to suspend the
`
`action); see generally 37 C.F.R. §2.l l7(a) (“Whenever it shall come to the attention of the
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that a party or parties to a pending case are engaged in a civil
`
`action or another Board proceeding which may have a bearing on the case, proceedings before
`
`the Board may be suspended until termination of the civil action or the other Board
`
`proceeding.”)).
`
`We note that another separate but related proceeding, Glock’s Petition for Cancellation of
`
`the G19 mark (No. 92061240, filed April 9, 2015), was suspended pending further review and
`
`briefing by the parties by Interlocutory Attorney Elizabeth Dunn on June 26, 2015, after the
`
`undersigned raised similar concerns about overlapping factual issues between the underlying
`
`lawsuit and the cancellation petition in relation to the G19 mark. Moreover, although settlement
`
`discussions may not have occurred yet regarding the issues pending before the Trademark Trial
`
`and Appeal Board, The Wuster has indeed engaged in settlement discussions with Glock
`
`regarding the underlying lawsuit. Although the overlapping facts between the underlying lawsuit
`
`and Glock’s application would be sufficient grounds to grant The Wuster’s request for extension
`
`of time, by this motion The Wuster instead seeks to suspend the application entirely.
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, The Wuster respectfully requests Glock’s application
`
`regarding G17 and G18 be suspended until the issues in the underlying lawsuit regarding G17-
`
`and G18 are resolved.
`
`Dated this
`
`day of July, 2015.
`
`
`
`PAUL S. MARKS, State Bar No. 138407
`NEUFELD MARKS
`315 W. 9”‘ Street, Suite 501
`Los Angeles, California 90015
`Telephone: (213) 625-2625
`Facsimile: (213) 625-2650
`
`Attorneys for Opposer Kent Wu and The Wuster
`
`
`
`{I
`
`\A
`
`
`
`Attachment A
`
`
`
`4|
`
`1*
`
`Case :L':L4~cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 47
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ROME DIVISION
`
`GLOCK, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KENT DE—HUI WU a/k/a KENT WU a/k/a
`KEAT D. WU a/k/a KENNETH WU a/k/a
`3
`KENNETH WILSON, MAY-FONG CI-IU
`a/k/aMAYCHU a/k/aMAYFUNCHU
`a/k/a MIAN CHU a/k/a MAY SCHWARZ,
`THE WUSTER, DA WUSTER INC., DA
`WUSTER CORR, WUSTER &. CHEWY
`LLC (California), WUSTER & CHEWY
`LLC (Washington), THE WUSTER INC.,
`XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, and ABC
`LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 1-10,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`-.J\/vggg/\/\./\/\z\_4\guu\./\../\./\/\./\.J Civil Action No.: 1:1u:v—5ss.mr
`
`COMPLQINT
`
`COMES NOW Plaintiff, GLOCK, Inc. (“GLOCK”) by and through its
`
`attorneys, Miller & Martin, PLLC, for its Complaint against Defendants alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`|l806982vl
`
`
`
`l
`
`H
`
`Case 1:14—cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/2611-4 Page 2 of 47
`
`_1fARf]]__!§S
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff GLOCK is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state of Georgia with its principal place of business at 6000 Highlands
`
`Parkway, Smyrna, GA 30082.
`
`2.
`
`Kent De-Hui Wu a/k/a Kent Wu a/k/a’ Keat D. Wu a/k/a Kenneth Wu
`
`a/k/a Kenneth Wilson (“Wu”) is a citizen ofthe state of California.
`
`3.
`
`May—Fong Chu a/Ida May Chu a/k/a May Fun Chu, a/k./a Mian Chu
`
`a/k/a May Schwarz (“Chu”) is a citizen ofthe state of California.
`
`4.
`
`Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplatcom.
`
`5. Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplat Los Angeles, located at 3809
`
`Durbin Street, Irwindale, CA 91706.
`
`6.
`
`Wu and Chu own and operate Airsplat Seattle,
`
`located at
`
`I20
`
`Andover Park E # 150‘, Seattle, WA 98188 (AirSplat.com, Airsplat Los Angeles
`
`and Airsplat Seattle are hereinafter collectively referred to as “AirSp1at”).
`
`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, Wu and Chu have created an elaborate
`
`system of corporate entities designed to conceal their ownership and operation of
`
`Airsplat.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant The Wuster is a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in California.
`
`1 l8D6982v1
`
`
`
`l
`
`l
`
`Case 1:.14«-CV-O0568—AT Document 1 Filed O2/26114 Page 3 of 47
`
`9.
`
`Defendant Da Wuster Inc. was a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in
`
`California.
`
`10. Defendant Wustcr & Chewy LLC (California) was a limited liability
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the state of Califomia with its
`
`principal place ofbusiness in California.
`
`11. Defendant Wuster & Chewy LLC (Washington) is a limited liability
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of the state of Washington, with its
`
`principal place of business in Washington.
`
`12. Defendant The Wustcr Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the state of Washington with its principal place of business in
`
`Washington.
`
`13. Da Wuster Corp is‘ a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the state ofNevada, with its principal place of business in Nevada.
`
`14. XYZ Corporations 1-10 are additional coxporations that Wu and Chu
`
`have created to conceal their ownership and operation of Airsplat, the identities of
`
`which are currently unknown to Plaintiff.
`
`ll8069B2vl
`
`
`
`l
`
`l
`
`Case 1:14~cv-00568-AT Document 1 -Filed 02/26/14 Page 4 of 47
`
`15. ABC Limited Liability Companies 1-10 are additional limited liability
`
`companies that Wu and Chu have created to conceal their ownership and operation
`
`of Airsplat, the identities ofwhich are currently unknown to Plaintiff.
`
`16. Wu and Chu are corporate ofiicers of the limited liability company
`
`defendants.
`
`17. Defendants The Wuster, Da Wuster Inc., Wuster & Chewy LLC
`
`(California), Wuster & Chewy LLC (Washington), The Wuster Inc., Da Wuster
`
`Corp, XYZ Corporations 1-10, and ABC Limited Liability Companies 1-10 are
`
`hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Airsplat Corporate Entities.”
`
`18.
`
`In marketing, selling, importing and distributing GLOCK Replicas (as
`
`hereinafter defined)
`
`into the United States,
`
`including the State of Georgia,
`
`Defendants have committed unlawful acts, including, but not limited to, patent
`
`infringement, federal trade dress infringement, federal trademark infringement,
`
`federal false designation of origin and false advertising, federal dilution, common
`
`law trade dress and trademark infringement, unfair competition, deceptive trade
`
`practices, and unjust enrichment, disgorgemcnt and constructive trust as more fiilly
`
`set forth herein within the Northern District of Georgia.
`
`1 l8D6982v 1'
`
`
`
`Case 1:14~cv-00568-AT Document 1 Ffled 02/26I14 Page 5 of 47
`
`JURISDICTION AND ZQQQ
`
`19.
`
`This is an action for injunctive relief, damages, treble damages and an
`
`award for attorneys’ fees for infringement of a patent issued by the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO") under 35 U.S.C. §«271, et. seq.
`
`20.
`
`This is also an action for injunctive relief, damages, treble damages
`
`and an award for attorneys’
`
`fees
`
`for
`
`infiingement of federal
`
`trade dress’
`
`registrations and federal trademark registrations under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a);
`
`trade dress infiingement and unfair competition under Section 43 (a) of the Lanham
`
`Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); trademark infringement and unfiir competition under
`
`Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,_ 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); dilution of a famous trade
`
`dress under Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § _1125(c); dilution of a
`
`famous trademark under Section 43(c) ofthe Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § i12S(c); for
`
`deceptive trade practices in violation of the Georgia Deceptive Trade Practices
`
`Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-370, er. seq. for unfair competition in violation of Georgia
`
`Unfair Competition Statute, 0.C.G.A- § 23-2-55, et. seq. for unfair competition in
`
`violation of common law; and for unjust enrichment, disgorgement and
`
`constructive trust in violation of common law.
`
`21.
`
`This Court has
`
`subject matter
`
`jurisdiction over
`
`the patent
`
`infringement,
`
`trade
`
`dress
`
`infringement,
`
`trademark
`
`infringement,
`
`unfair
`
`tl806982v1
`
`
`
`Case 1:14—cv~O0568—AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 6 of 47
`
`competition, false designation of origin and false advertising, and dilution pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 & 1338.
`
`22.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the state and common
`
`law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l332(a)(l) because there is complete diversity
`
`of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendants and the amount in controversy
`
`exceeds $75,000 exclusive of interest and costs, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1367(3).
`
`23.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants pursuant to
`
`the provisions of the Georgia Long Arm Statute, O.C.G.A. § 9~10-91.
`
`24. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1391 and § 14000;).
`
`mars COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`25.
`
`In 1982, Gaston Glock developed the first commercially successful
`
`polymer—frame semi-automatic pistol, the GLOCK 17. It has been well publicized
`
`that the GLOCK 17 was regarded as a radically new design in virtually every
`
`respect It revolutionized the industry. The new, unique appearance of the GLOCK
`
`17 featured an external design and image that was a significant departure from the
`
`1 l806982v1
`
`
`
`Case 1:14»-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 7 of 47
`
`traditional metal design widely used over the last century by other pistol
`
`manufacturers, such as Smith & Wesson, Heckler & Koch and Colt.
`
`26. GLOCK was formed in 1985 to assemble and market the GLOCK 17
`
`in the United States. Subsequently, Gaston Glock developed a complete family of
`
`GLOCK pistols, including the Model 17L, Model 18, Model 19, Model 20, Model
`
`21, Model 22, Model 23, Model 24, Model 25, Model 26, Model 27, Model 2.8,
`
`Model 29, Model 30, Model 31, Model 32, Model 33, Model 34, Model 35, Model
`
`36, Model 37, Model 38, Model 39., Model 41, and Model 42. The family of
`
`polyme1‘—framc pistols is herein collectively referred to as the “GLOCK pistols.”
`
`Despite some initial skepticism from gun traditionalists,
`
`the GLOCK. pistols
`
`became enormously successful in the United States, with consumers and especially
`
`with law enforcement agencies. By 1991, more than 3,500 Federal, State and local
`
`law enforcement agencies and departments in the United States had adopted or
`
`approved GLOCK pistols for duty use. By 1996, GLOCK captured over one half
`
`of the United States law enforcement handgun market. GLOCK pistols are
`
`presently used by over sixty-five percent (65%) of Federal, State and local law
`
`enforcement agencies across the Country,
`
`including the Federal Bureau of
`
`Investigation, Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
`
`I l8D6982vl
`
`
`
`Case 1:14~cv—00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Rage 8 of 47
`
`27. Gaston Glock’s original design and concept for the GLOCK 17 has
`
`stayed virtually intact for the entire line of GLOCK pistols since ‘creation. All of
`
`the various GLOCK pistols share the same distinctive design and appearance as the
`
`original Model 17.
`
`23. GLOCK pistols feature a distinctive appearance and overall image,
`
`which represents a significant departure from the traditional pistol designs used by
`
`other pistol manufacturers. GLOCK pistols include a polymer-frame with a slide
`
`top lever built flush into one side of the flame and a small slide lock positioned in
`
`an angled groove on both sides of the flame above the trigger. The slide and the
`
`upper part of the polymer-firame on GLOCK pistols have a distinctive blocky and
`
`squared-off shape, with polymer sights carrying a white dot on the top of the slide
`
`and serrations on each side of the rear portion of the slide. The serial number plate
`
`is embedded on the underside of the front part of the frame. The interface between
`
`the slide and the frame on GLOCK pistols includes a distinctive gap. The bottom
`
`portion of the frame includes both the handgrip and trigger guard. The handgrip of
`
`GLOCK pistols includes distinctive. serrations on the front and rear faces and both
`
`sides of a GLOCK pistol handgrip are slightly raised and textured. The front face
`ofthe handgrip includes two raised fnger ridges. At the transition between the rear
`
`of the gun and the handgrip is a slightly projecting down-turned lip. The nigger
`
`ll806982vl
`
`
`
`(ll
`
`Case 1:14—cv~Op0568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 9 of 4?
`
`guard of a GLOCK pistol is also a blocky and squared~off shape with distinctive
`
`serrations on the front face. This previously unknown selection of non-functional
`
`design elements present an inherently distinctive appearance and have acquired
`
`secondary meaning. True and correct copies of photographs of select GLOCK
`
`model pistols are attached as Eghigit A.
`
`GLOCK T
`
`E D
`
`S
`
`29.
`
`The trade dress of GLOCK pistols has acquired a substantial level of
`
`source identifying capability-, i.e., secondary meaning. ‘This secondary meaning is
`
`the result of, among other things, the widespread popularity and use of GLOCK
`
`pistols by law enforcement agencies and civilians throughout the United States,
`
`GLOCK’s extensive marketing and promotional efforts, and extensive third-party
`
`publicity.
`
`30. GLOCK is the owner of a federal trademark registration for its trade
`
`dress in International Class 13, Reg. No. 2,807,747 registered on January 27, 2004
`
`by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). A true and correct
`
`copy of the registration is attached as Exhihit Q. The description of the mark is as
`
`follows:
`
`The mark consists of the three dimensional overall
`configuration of a semi—automatic pistol having a blocky
`an[d] squared—off shape as viewed from the side, the
`front, and the rear. The vertical lines at the rear of the
`
`ll806982vl
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-0O568—AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 10 of 47
`
`slide indicate ridges. The stippling is a feature of the
`mark and not intended to indicate color. The dotted lines
`indicate features that are not claimed as a part of the
`mark. Neither the shape of the notch on the rear sight nor
`the circular shape of the interior of the barrel are claimed
`as a part of the mark. The shape of the trigger guard and
`the shape, location, and position of the trigger safety tab
`are claimed as a part of the mark, but no claim is made to
`the shape of the trigger separate from the trigger safety
`tab.
`.
`
`Reg. No. 2,807,747 is incontestable pursuant to Section 15 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. §1065 and therefore, GLOCK. has the exclusive right to use its trade dress.
`
`GLOCK also holds a second incontestable trade dress registration, Reg. No.
`
`2,807,745.
`
`31. Acceptance of GLOCK pistols in the marketplace was immediate, and
`
`sales of GLOCK pistols have continued to grow since their introduction. GLOCK
`
`has promoted the sale of its pistols by extensive advertising in newspapers and
`
`magazines as well as through appearances at
`
`trade shows and other events
`
`throughout the United States. Newspapers and magazines throughout the United
`
`States have included feature articles about the GLOCK pistols, and such pistols
`
`have been generally recognized in the press as the leading polymer-frame semi-
`
`automatic pistol
`
`in the worldwide market. Such articles have featured the
`
`distinctive appearance and the unique operation of GLOCK pistols. True and
`
`l l806982vl
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv~O0568~AT Document 1 Filed 02I26l14 Page 11 of 47
`
`correct copies of articles featuring or discussing GLOCK pistols from several
`
`leading handgun magazines are attached as Exhib;§' c-1-cg.
`
`32. Another form of third-party publicity of GLOCK pistols has been in
`
`television and movies. For example, GLOCK pistols have been featured in movie
`
`productions such as INCEPTION, THE TOWN, THE FUGITIVE, DIE HARD II,
`
`BAD BOYS 1], and TRUE LIES, and television, productions such as THE
`
`SOPRANOS, 24, X-FILES, NYPD BLUE, cs1,
`
`IUSTIFIED and LAW &
`
`ORDER. Hundreds of instances of use of GLOCK pistols in film, television and
`
`video games have been compiled on the Internet Movie Firearm Database available
`
`at http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Glock. Such widespread publicity has contributed to
`
`GLOCK pistols being among the most recognizable pistols in the world.
`
`33. GLOCK has developed valuable goodwill in the trade dress of the
`
`GLOCK pistols, and the relevant public, including the public within the Northern
`
`District of Georgia, have come to know, recognize and identify the distinctive look
`
`and appearance of a pistol originating fi~om GLOCK.
`
`34. As a result of extensive sales, marking and promotion by GLOCK and
`
`others, the trade dress of the GLOCK pistol has become world famous.
`
`35. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants the authority,
`
`permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or sell a pistol that
`
`ll806982vl
`
`l l
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-005.68-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 12 of 47
`
`copies or otherwise utilizes the trade dress of the GLOCK pistol or that resembles
`
`a GLOCK pistol.
`
`§LOCK’S TRADE
`
`36.
`
`In addition to its world famous trade dress, Plaintifi‘ GLOCK holds
`
`several incontestable and world famous trademarks for its GLOCK logo, including
`
`the mark
`
`“GLOCK”
`
`(Reg. No.
`
`1,691,390),
`
`and the mark “GLOCK
`
`PERFECTION” (Reg. No. 2,440,268). True and correct copy of Trademark Reg.
`
`No. 1,691,390 and Reg. No. 2,440,268 are attached as Exhipit_§ D-1 - D-2.
`
`37. On February 4, 1986, Plaintiff obtained a trademark registration (Reg.
`
`No. 1,381,064) for its GLOCK logo in IC 008 for “hand-held tools, cutlery, and
`
`hand—he1d weapons, particularly spades, knives and bayoncts,” and IC 013 for '
`
`“ammunition and bullets, explosives, fireworks, and hand—grcnades.” A true and
`
`correct copy of Trademark Reg. No. 1,3 81,064 is attached as Exhigit D—3.
`
`38. On October 1}, 2011, Plaintiff obtained a trademark registration (Reg.
`
`No. 4,03 8,822) for its GLOCK logo in IC 013 for “airsoft guns.” A true and correct
`
`copy of Trademark Reg. No. 4,038,822 is attached as
`
`39. On September 11, 2012, Plainfifi obtained a trademark registration
`(Reg. No. 4,204,831), “Gen 4” in 10 013 for “firearms.” A true and correct copy of
`
`Trademark Reg. No. 4,204,83lis attached as Exhibit D-5.
`
`1 180698.’-!v1
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv—D0568-AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 13 of 47
`
`40.
`
`The trademarks for the GLOCK logo as well as for “Gen 4,” are
`
`inherently distinctive, have achieved secondary meaning and enjoy global fame.
`
`41. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants the authority,
`
`permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or sell a pistol that
`
`copies or otherwise utilizes the GLOCK’s trademarks.
`
`GLQCICS ‘677 PATENT
`
`42.
`
`Separate and apart from GLOCK’s world famous trade dress and
`
`trademarks, Gaston Glock is also recognized as an innovator in the field of firearm
`
`accessories, and has invented several patents for firearm accessories,
`
`including
`
`baekstrap assemblies.
`
`43. On April 17, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,156,677 (“‘677 Patent”
`
`or “patent-in-suit”) was duly issued to Plaintiff by the USPTO for ASSEMBLIES
`
`AND FIREARMS INCORPORATING SUCH ASSEMBLIES after a full and fair
`
`examination for backstrap assemblies and firearms incorporating such assemblies
`
`to provide a wide range of solid grips for fireanns, which was filed on April 15,
`
`2010. A true and correct copy of ‘677 Patent is attached as Exhm; E.
`
`44.
`
`The ‘677 Patent enables marksman to selectively mount and elongate
`
`removable backstrap to a grip of the firearm to effectively increase the size of the
`
`grip-
`
`l 1806982!/l
`
`
`
`Case 1:14~cv—00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02I26l14 Page 14 of 47
`
`45.
`
`The ‘677 Patent uses a trigger housing pin to secure the backstrap to
`
`the trigger mechanism housing and the receiver ofthe firearm.
`
`46.
`
`Plaintifi‘ is and at all times relevant has been, the patentee and lawful
`
`owner ofthe ‘677 Patent and possesses all substantive rights and rights ofrecovery
`
`under the ‘677 Patent, including the right to sue for infringement and recover past
`
`damages.
`
`47.
`
`The ‘677 Patent is valid and enforceable up to its expiration on April
`
`15, 2030.
`
`48. GLOCK has not licensed or granted to Defendants Airsplat Corporate
`
`Entities the authority, permission, or any other right to make, use, offer for sale, or
`
`sell a pistol that copies or otherwise utilizes the ‘677 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`The backstrap assembly that is the subject of the ‘677 Patent is a
`
`firearm accessory, and is
`
`separate and apart
`
`from GLOCK’s trade dress
`
`registrations described herein.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ ACTIVITIES
`
`50. Defendants Airsplat Corporate Entities claim to be the “Nation’s
`
`Largest Airsofi Retailer” and own and operate an Internet retail store for airsoft
`
`guns at mmgygggflz, through which they market and sell various airsofl; guns
`
`and related products throughout the United States, including in this judicial district.
`
`ttsosmvt
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv—0056B-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 15 of 47
`
`DEFENDANTS’ LEAUTHORIZED A32 gflrclzusnn USE on
`G ggrgg 134312: nggss
`
`51. Airsoft guns fire non-metallic pellets for use in simulated combat and
`
`similar recreational sport. They are subject to federal regulation as “look-alike
`
`firearms” pursuant to 15 C.F.R. Part 1150, as well as to regulation by many states
`
`and municipalities.
`
`52. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 17 (“GLOCK 17
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhigg’ ‘K-1: (1) WE
`
`G17 Airsofi Gas Blowbaok Gun Tan; (2) WE G17 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol; (3) WinGun 104 G17 Gas Airsofi Gun Pistol; (4) HFC G17 Spring Airsofl
`
`Gun Pistol; (5) HFC G17 Black/Silver Spring Airsolt Gun; (6) HFC G17 Gas
`
`Blowback Airsott Gun Pistol; (7) KSC G17 Gas Airsofi Blowback Gun Pistol OD;
`
`(8) UHC G17 Spring Airsoft Pistol Black; (9) Army G17 Meister METAL Gas
`
`Airsoft Gun; (10) KWA ATP Airsoft Gas Blowback Gun Pistol; (11) KWA ATP
`
`Full Auto Gas Blowback Pistol; and (I2) KWC G17 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol.
`
`53. Among the airsoit guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 17L (“GLOCK 17L
`
`Replicas”), including the following aizsofl guns shown on : (1) HFC
`
`1 lsossszvi
`
`1 5
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226114 Page 16 of 47
`
`G17L G34 Spring Airsoft Gun BS; and (2) HFC G17L G34 Spring Airsofi Gun
`
`Black.
`
`54. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCKL Model 18 (“GLOCK 18
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsofl guns shown on Exhibit §—§: (1) CYMA
`
`G180 Airsoit Spring Gun Pistol ZM17; (2) WE G18C Auto Airsott Gas Blowback
`
`Gun; (3) WE G18C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Tan; (4) Eohol Timberwolf
`
`Ah-soft Gas GBB Gun Tan; (5)Echo1 TimbcrwolfAirsofi Gas GBB Gun BLK; (6)
`
`APS C02 Action Combat Airsoft Pistol; (7) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol
`
`Nomad; (8) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol Mandrake; (9) APS ACP Custom
`
`Camo CO2 Pistol MCam; (10) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol Highland;
`
`(11) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol ATC FG; (12) APS ACP Custom Camo
`
`CO2 Pistol ATC TN; and (13) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Typhon.
`
`55. Among the airsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 19 (“GLOCK 19
`
`Replicas”), including the: following airsofl guns shown on : (1) KSC
`
`G19 Gas Airsoft Blowback Gun Pistol; (2) WE G19 Ainsofi Gas Blowback Gun
`
`Pistol; (3) WE G19 Airsofi Gas Blowbaok Gun Tan; (4) Echo] Tunbérwolf Airsofi
`
`Gas GBB Gun Tan; (5) Echol Timberwolf Airsofl Gas GBB Gun BLK; (6) APS
`
`ll806982vl
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Fiied 02/261314 Page 17 of 47
`
`CO2 Action Combat Airsofi Pistol; (7) APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol
`
`Nomad; (8) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Mandrake; (9) APS ACP Custom
`
`Camo CO2 Pistol MCam; (10) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2 Pistol Highland; (11)
`
`APS ACP Custom Camo C02 Pistol ATC FG; (12) APS ACP Custom Camo CO2
`
`Pistol ATC TN; and (.13) APS ACP Custom Camo coz Pistol Typhon.
`
`56. Among the airsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 23 (“GLOCK 23
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhibit F-5: (1) KJW
`
`G23 METAL Gas Aitsofi Gun Pistol OD; (2) KSC/KWA ATP G23F Full Auto
`
`Gas Airsofi Blowback; (3) KJW G23 METAL Gas Blowback Airsofi Gun; (4)
`
`KJW G230 METAL Gas Airsofc Gun GBB QD; (5) KJW G230 METAL Gas
`
`Blowback Airsoft Gun; (6) WE G23C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Tan; and (7) WE
`
`G23C Airsofi Gas Blowback Gun Black.
`
`57. Among the airsoft guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 26 (“GLOCK 26
`
`Replicas”), including the following airsoft guns shown on Exhibit F-6: (1) CYMA
`
`Boy G26 Spring Airsofl Gun Pistol; (2) I-IFC G26 Spring Airsoft Gun Pistol Black;
`
`(3) HFC G26 Spring Ajrsoft Gun Pistol Silver; (4) HFC G26 METAL Airsoft Gas
`
`l I 806982vl
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 18 of 47
`
`BB Gun Pistol; (5) KSC G26C Full Auto Metal Gas Gun; (6) WE G26 Airsofi Gas
`
`Blowback Gun Black; and (7) WE G26 Airsofi Gas Blowback Gim Tan.
`
`58. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies ofthe GLOCK Model 30 (“GLOCK 30 Replicas”)
`
`including the following airsofc gun shown on : CYMA P698 G30.
`
`Spxing Airsoft Gun Pistol.
`
`59. Among the airsoft guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 33 (“GLOCK 33 Replica”)
`
`including the following aixsofi guns shown on Exhibit F—8: (1) WE G33 Advance
`
`Gas Blowback Pistol Black; and (2) WE G33 Advance Gas Blowback Pistol Tan.
`
`60. Among the airsofi guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 34 (“GLOCK 34 Replicas”)
`
`including the following aixsoft guns shown on Exhibit E9: (1) WE G34 Airsofi
`
`Gas Blowback Gun Pistol; (2) HFC G171. G34 Spring Airsofc Gun BS; and (3)
`
`HFC G17L G34 Spring Airsoft Gun Black.
`
`61. Among the aixsofl guns that Defendants offer and sell are unlicensed
`
`and unauthorized replica copies of the GLOCK Model 35 (“GLOCK 35 Replicas”)
`
`including the following aixsott gun shown on : WE G35 Auto Airsofi
`
`Gas Blowback Gun.
`
`1 l306982v I
`
`
`
`Case1:14—cv—00568-AT Documentl Filed 02/26/14 Page 19 of 47 V
`
`62.
`
`Each of the GLOCK Replicas shown on Exhibit; F-1 to F-10 uses a
`
`product name that includes either G17, G17L, G18, G19, G23, G26, G30, G33,
`
`G34 or G35, which in each case corresponds to the specific model of the GLOCK
`
`pistol that is being copied.
`
`63. On their website, as shown on Exhibit Q1, Defendants state that:
`
`“Generally speaking, most of the more popular real-steel firearms has an
`Airsofi gun counterpart... Pistols such as the famed Berettas, Colts, SIGs,
`and Glocks... The list of Airsoit guns is quite sizeable, and growing with
`each passing month.”
`
`64.
`
`For several of the GLGCK Replicas shown on Exhibits F--] to F-10,
`
`AirSp1at includes product descriptions which either allude to, or expressly refer to,
`
`the world famous GLOCK pistols, including the following for the HFC G17 Spring
`
`Airsoft Gun Pistol:
`
`“The G17 is one of the most highly regarded pistols in the world. This spring
`replica captures the look and feel of the world famous pistol. The HFC G17
`is weighted to nearly match the exact weight of the actual thing. The locking
`slide will alert you when your magazine is empty, just like the real thing!"
`
`65.
`
`On their website, Defendants state: “The main concern surrounding
`
`airsoft gun safety is the realistic nature of the weapons themselves. Aiisofi guns
`
`are exact replicas of lethal firearms in both appearance and weight... [A]irsofi guns
`
`can easily be mistaken for real firearms,” as shown on Exhipit Q~2.
`
`I l806982vl
`
`
`
`Case 1:14—cv—OU56B—AT Document 1 Filed 02126114 Page 20 of 47
`
`66. Defendants offer and sell several models of airsofi guns under licenses
`
`fiom the manufacturers ofthe actual firearms which are being copied, including for
`
`example, an airsofr copy of the Colt 1911 pistol, SIG 552 Commando AEG Gun
`
`Tan and Walter P99 CO2 Blowback Pistol as shown on Exhibit Q-g, Eggjplt G-4
`
`and Exhibit G-5, but has no license fiom GLOCK to make, use, offer for sale, or
`
`sell any ofthe GLOCK Replicas.
`
`67. On their website, Defendants tout that they have supplied airsofi
`
`pistols for use in films and television shows as stand-ins for the firearms fiom
`
`which they are copied, including several of the GLOCK Replicas, as shown on
`
`Eghibit G-6.
`
`R
`
`68.
`
`On their website, as shown on Exhibit G-6, Defendants state that:
`
`“Often, people would watch movies and TV and say, "Wow, that gun is
`awesome, I'd like to get me one of those". Actually, what you may be seeing
`in those movies and TV shows, ARE, in fact, Airsofi guns. Due to their
`relatively cheap price tags and precise realism, movie studios often employ
`Airsoft guns for it's production work. They simply digitally alter the images
`to incorporate the muzzle flash, sound and effects to mimic the real
`firearms.”
`
`69. Airsplat
`
`resellers, and reviewers of Airsplat products, describe
`
`GLOCK Replicas as copies of the world famous GLOCK pistols, examples of
`
`which are attached as
`
`l l806982vl
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 0226/14 Page 21 of 47
`
`70. On another website, as shown on Exhibit (3-8, one reviewer of the
`
`KJW G23 METAL Gas Blowback Airsoit Gtm states that: “this is the best glock i
`
`[sic] have ever shot.”
`
`71. Upon information and belief, Defmdant Wu,
`
`the Chief Executive
`
`Officer, President and Founder of the Airsplnt Corporate Entities, knew that one or
`
`more of the GLOCK. Replicas referenced herein were unlicensed and unauthorized
`
`copies of the world famous GLOCK pistols and were being marketed by the
`
`Airsplat Corporate Entities in a manner intended to cause market confusion and in
`
`violation of GLOCK’s registered trade dress and legally protected rights.
`
`72. Defendant Wu was a moving, active and conscious force behind the
`
`unlawful advertising and sales activities described herein.
`
`73. Upon information and belief, Defendant Chu, the Vice President of
`
`the AirSplat Corporate Entities, knew that one or more of the GLOCK Replicas
`
`referenced herein were unlicensed and unauthorized copies of the world famous
`
`GLOCK pistols and were being marketed by the Airsplat Corporate Entities in a
`
`manner intended to cause market confusion and in violation of GLOCK’s
`
`registered trade dress and legally protected rights.
`
`74. Defendant Chu was a moving, active and conscious force behind the
`
`unlawful advertising and’ sales activities described herein.
`
`1 i8Dli982vl
`
`21
`
`
`
`~|
`
`H
`
`Case 1:14-cv-00568-AT Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 22 of 47
`
`UNLICENSED Ufifl OF
`DEFENDANTS’ UNAUTHORIZED
`GLOCK’§ TRADEMARICS
`
`75. Defendants advertise and offer for sale numerous GLOCK Replicas
`
`that utilize GLOCK’s registered trademarks.
`
`7