`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)
`
`Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
`
`The table below presents the data as entered.
`
`Input Field
`
`Entered
`
`SERIAL NUMBER
`
`85886550
`
`LAW OFFICE
`ASSIGNED
`
`MARK SECTION
`
`LAW OFFICE 109
`
`MARK
`
`http://tmng-al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/85886550/large
`
`LITERAL ELEMENT
`
`INCA TEA
`
`STANDARD
`CHARACTERS
`
`USPTO-GENERATED
`IMAGE
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`MARK STATEMENT
`
`ARGUMENT(S)
`
`The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font
`style, size or color.
`
`In the Office Action dated January 27, 2015, the Examining Attorney made final the Section 2(d) refusal
`alleging a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark INCA TEA and INCA’S FOOD
`w/Design.(cid:160) Applicant filed an amendment to the statement of goods along with a request for
`reconsideration.(cid:160) The Examining Attorney denied the request for reconsideration, but the amendment
`was entered.(cid:160) Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney reconsider reconsideration
`and withdrawal of the Section 2(d) refusal.
`
`No Actual Confusion
`
`Although a Statement of Use has not yet been filed, Applicant has been actively marketing and selling
`its purple corn tea product under the presently pending design trademark application for over a year and
`a half.(cid:160) In that time, not a single instance of confusion has arisen based on Applicant’s mark and the
`cited registrant’s mark.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Furthermore, Applicant has expanded its business and sells its purple corn tea in grocery stores, through
`its website, and at international airports.(cid:160) Thus, the mark is exposed to a significant number of people,
`and not a single instance of confusion has arisen as stated above.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Applicant’s Family of Marks—Consistent Examination is Essential
`
`In addition to the subject mark, Applicant owns several other INCA formative marks which have
`
`
`
`already been approved and published, but remain pending in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.(cid:160)
`TESS copies of the previously published applications are attached under Exhibit G and include:(cid:160) INCA
`TEA CAFE · CLE w/Design, subject of Serial No. 86457242, for restaurant services.(cid:160) This mark
`prominently bears the words INCA TEA along the top. (cid:160)This mark is very similar to Applicant’s
`pending mark, and has already been allowed.(cid:160) It is respectfully submitted that the Examining Attorney
`should act consistently with the INCA TEA CAFE · CLE w/Design mark and approve the presently
`pending mark for publication.(cid:160)
`
`Applicant also owns Application No. 86457184 for the mark INCA POP for popcorn, which published
`on January 20, 2015.(cid:160) Here, again, Applicant’s presently pending teas are comprised of purple corn, and
`INCA POP consists of popcorn—both highly related in that they contain corn as a featured ingredient.(cid:160)
`It is respectfully requested that the Examining Attorney handling the subject application act consistently
`with the INCA POP application and approve this INCA TEA mark for publication.(cid:160)
`
`Applicant also owns Serial No. 86457218 for the mark INCAN MEAL covering grain-based natural
`meal replacement bars.(cid:160) This mark published for opposition on April 7, 2015, and the goods are closely
`related to the goods in the subject INCA TEA mark in that they can be consumed together, i.e., you can
`drink Applicant’s INCA TEA brand purple corn tea and with its INCAN MEAL meal replacement bars.
`
`Since Applicant’s other three marks listed above can be approved in light of INCA’S FOOD, then
`certainly the pending mark here should likewise be approved.(cid:160) The only similarities between the present
`mark and the cited mark is the word “INCA” which, as previously argued, is a commonly used term
`and suggestive of the origin of Applicant’s purple corn tea.(cid:160)
`
`Again, Applicant submits that the subject application should be treated consistently with the other
`pending application, which were approved for publication, published, and no oppositions were raised.
`
`INCA is a Weak Trademark Formative
`
`The only commonality between Applicant’s mark and the cited mark is the word INCA. The relative
`strength of INCA as a trademark component is an important factor in determining whether there is a
`likelihood of confusion—which there is not.(cid:160) Since there are numerous INCA formative marks in the
`food and beverage category, which consist of goods and services closely related to tea, it is submitted
`that the INCA term is weak and consumers are well accustomed to seeing other INCA marks in
`association with foods/beverages and related goods and services.(cid:160)
`
`For these reasons, it is respectfully requested that the Examining Attorney reconsider and withdraw the
`Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal and approve the mark for publication.(cid:160) Early notice to that
`effect is solicited.
`
`EVIDENCE SECTION
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)ORIGINAL PDF
`FILE
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)CONVERTED PDF
`FILE(S)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(4 pages)
`
`evi_3867194146-20150727135413010760_._FLOR500003_ExhibitG.pdf
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\858\865\85886550\xml23\RFR0002.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\858\865\85886550\xml23\RFR0003.JPG
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\858\865\85886550\xml23\RFR0004.JPG
`
`\\TICRS\EXPORT16\IMAGEOUT16\858\865\85886550\xml23\RFR0005.JPG
`
`DESCRIPTION OF
`EVIDENCE FILE
`
`Exhibit G
`
`SIGNATURE SECTION
`
`RESPONSE
`SIGNATURE
`
`/sandramkoenig/
`
`SIGNATORY'S NAME
`
`Sandra M. Koenig
`
`SIGNATORY'S
`POSITION
`
`Attorney of record, Ohio bar member
`
`SIGNATORY'S PHONE
`NUMBER
`
`216-363-9000
`
`DATE SIGNED
`
`AUTHORIZED
`SIGNATORY
`
`CONCURRENT
`APPEAL NOTICE
`FILED
`
`07/27/2015
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`FILING INFORMATION SECTION
`
`SUBMIT DATE
`
`Mon Jul 27 13:58:37 EDT 2015
`
`TEAS STAMP
`
`USPTO/RFR-38.67.194.146-2
`0150727135837549579-85886
`550-5405797fabfd44812d9be
`a339a151cef06e882530ee78a
`f50a4104d74ec972bd-N/A-N/
`A-20150727135413010760
`
`PTO Form 1960 (Rev 9/2007)
`
`OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp. 07/31/2017)
`
`Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
`To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
`
`Application serial no. 85886550(cid:160)INCA TEA(Standard Characters, see http://tmng-
`al.uspto.gov/resting2/api/img/85886550/large) has been amended as follows:
`
`ARGUMENT(S)
`In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`
`In the Office Action dated January 27, 2015, the Examining Attorney made final the Section 2(d) refusal
`alleging a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark INCA TEA and INCA’S FOOD w/Design.(cid:160)
`Applicant filed an amendment to the statement of goods along with a request for reconsideration.(cid:160) The
`Examining Attorney denied the request for reconsideration, but the amendment was entered.(cid:160) Applicant
`respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney reconsider reconsideration and withdrawal of the
`Section 2(d) refusal.
`
`No Actual Confusion
`
`Although a Statement of Use has not yet been filed, Applicant has been actively marketing and selling its
`purple corn tea product under the presently pending design trademark application for over a year and a
`half.(cid:160) In that time, not a single instance of confusion has arisen based on Applicant’s mark and the cited
`registrant’s mark.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Furthermore, Applicant has expanded its business and sells its purple corn tea in grocery stores, through
`its website, and at international airports.(cid:160) Thus, the mark is exposed to a significant number of people, and
`not a single instance of confusion has arisen as stated above.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Applicant’s Family of Marks—Consistent Examination is Essential
`
`In addition to the subject mark, Applicant owns several other INCA formative marks which have already
`been approved and published, but remain pending in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.(cid:160) TESS copies
`of the previously published applications are attached under Exhibit G and include:(cid:160) INCA TEA CAFE ·
`CLE w/Design, subject of Serial No. 86457242, for restaurant services.(cid:160) This mark prominently bears the
`words INCA TEA along the top. (cid:160)This mark is very similar to Applicant’s pending mark, and has already
`been allowed.(cid:160) It is respectfully submitted that the Examining Attorney should act consistently with the
`INCA TEA CAFE · CLE w/Design mark and approve the presently pending mark for publication.(cid:160)
`
`Applicant also owns Application No. 86457184 for the mark INCA POP for popcorn, which published on
`January 20, 2015.(cid:160) Here, again, Applicant’s presently pending teas are comprised of purple corn, and
`INCA POP consists of popcorn—both highly related in that they contain corn as a featured ingredient.(cid:160) It
`is respectfully requested that the Examining Attorney handling the subject application act consistently
`with the INCA POP application and approve this INCA TEA mark for publication.(cid:160)
`
`Applicant also owns Serial No. 86457218 for the mark INCAN MEAL covering grain-based natural meal
`replacement bars.(cid:160) This mark published for opposition on April 7, 2015, and the goods are closely related
`to the goods in the subject INCA TEA mark in that they can be consumed together, i.e., you can drink
`Applicant’s INCA TEA brand purple corn tea and with its INCAN MEAL meal replacement bars.
`
`Since Applicant’s other three marks listed above can be approved in light of INCA’S FOOD, then
`certainly the pending mark here should likewise be approved.(cid:160) The only similarities between the present
`mark and the cited mark is the word “INCA” which, as previously argued, is a commonly used term and
`suggestive of the origin of Applicant’s purple corn tea.(cid:160)
`
`Again, Applicant submits that the subject application should be treated consistently with the other pending
`application, which were approved for publication, published, and no oppositions were raised.
`
`INCA is a Weak Trademark Formative
`
`
`
`The only commonality between Applicant’s mark and the cited mark is the word INCA. The relative
`strength of INCA as a trademark component is an important factor in determining whether there is a
`likelihood of confusion—which there is not.(cid:160) Since there are numerous INCA formative marks in the food
`and beverage category, which consist of goods and services closely related to tea, it is submitted that the
`INCA term is weak and consumers are well accustomed to seeing other INCA marks in association with
`foods/beverages and related goods and services.(cid:160)
`
`For these reasons, it is respectfully requested that the Examining Attorney reconsider and withdraw the
`Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal and approve the mark for publication.(cid:160) Early notice to that
`effect is solicited.
`
`EVIDENCE
`Evidence in the nature of Exhibit G has been attached.
`Original PDF file:
`evi_3867194146-20150727135413010760_._FLOR500003_ExhibitG.pdf
`Converted PDF file(s) ( 4 pages)
`Evidence-1
`Evidence-2
`Evidence-3
`Evidence-4
`
`SIGNATURE(S)
`Request for Reconsideration Signature
`Signature: /sandramkoenig/(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)Date: 07/27/2015
`Signatory's Name: Sandra M. Koenig
`Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, Ohio bar member
`
`Signatory's Phone Number: 216-363-9000
`
`The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the
`highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal
`territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof;
`and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian
`attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder
`in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute
`power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to
`withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the
`owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney
`appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
`
`The applicant is filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.
`
`Serial Number: 85886550
`Internet Transmission Date: Mon Jul 27 13:58:37 EDT 2015
`TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-38.67.194.146-2015072713583754
`9579-85886550-5405797fabfd44812d9bea339a
`151cef06e882530ee78af50a4104d74ec972bd-N
`/A-N/A-20150727135413010760
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT GEXHIBIT G
`
`
`
`Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`®
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Homelsite Indexlsearch I FAQIGlossaryIGuides] Contaclsleausiness |eBiz alertsl Newsll-lelp
`
`Trademarks > Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`TESS was last updated on Mon Jul 27 03:22:42 EDT 2015
`
`TEES I'*IC=M’r'.
`
`I'i‘r,'l‘r i..":‘FF‘:
`
`~
`
`-~ SEARCH 96
`
`% 3%
`
`% L»*~‘:»‘: D’
`Please logout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you.
`
`List At: |: OR to record: :1 Reccrd 1 out of 5
`
`“A3 5‘'‘’‘i“5
`
`. ( Use the "Back" button of the Internet Browser to return to
`
`INCA TEA CAFE - CLE
`
`IC 043. US 100 101. G & 5: Restaurant services
`
`(3) DESIGN PLUS WORDS, LETTERS, ANDIOR NUMBERS
`
`06.01.04 - Mountains (landscapes); Scenery with mountains
`18.09.01 -Airplanes; Gliders, airplane
`26.01.03 - Circles, incomplete (more than semi-circles); Incomplete circles (more than semi-circles)
`26.01.17 — Circles, two concentric; Concentric circles, two; Two concentric circles
`26.01.20 - Circles within a circle
`86457242
`November 18, 2014
`1 B
`
`1B
`
`May 19, 2015
`
`(APPLICANT) Inca Tea, LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OHIO 6462 State Road. Suite O-19 Parma OHIO 44134
`
`Sandra M. Koenig
`
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "TEA", "CAFE“ AND "CLE" APART FROM THE MARK AS
`SHOWN
`Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of three concentric arcs with the words "INCA TEA"
`between two of the arcs along with 7 dots on each side of the words; the words "CAFE" and "CLE" in script letters
`appear blow the arc with a dot in between, and in the center of the arcs is an image of a mountain and a fonrvard facing
`airplane with the wings expanding horizontally beyond the arcs.
`SERVICE MARK
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Goods and
`Services
`
`Mark Drawing
`Code
`
`Design Search
`Code
`
`Serial Number
`Filing Date
`Current Basis
`Original Filing
`Basis
`Published for
`Opposition
`Owner
`
`Attorney of
`Record .
`Disclaimer
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Type of Mark
`Register
`LivelDead
`Indicator
`
`http ://tmsca1'ch.uspto .gov/bin/gate.exe?%doc&state=4805 :pc1ein.2. 1
`
`7/27/2015
`
`
`
`Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Home I Site IndexISearc[1I FAQ I Glossary I Guides I Contacts I eBusInessI eBiz alerts I News I Help
`
`Trademarks > Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`TESS was last updated on Mon Jul 27 03:22:42 EDT 2015
`
`%
`
`semcnoo
`
`1-{Em
`
`Please logout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you.
`
`ListAt:I:IORtorecord:I:I Record 3 out of 5
`
`“DR : ( Use the "Back" button of the Internet Browser to
`I
`return to TESS)
`
`INCA POP
`
`Word Mark
`
`INCA POP
`
`Goods and Services
`Standard Characters
`Claimed
`
`IC 030. US 046. G & S: Popcorn
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`Serial Number
`
`(4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`86457184
`
`Filin Date
`Current Basis
`
`November 18. 2014
`1B
`
`Original Filing Basis
`P bl‘ h df
`O‘r’)p"J";it‘§on °'
`Owner
`
`1B
`
`January 20, 2015
`(APPLICANT) Inca Tea, LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OHIO 6462 State Road,
`Suite O-19 Parrna OHIO 44‘! 34
`
`Attorney of Record
`Type of Mark
`Register
`LiveIDead Indicator
`
`Sandra M. Koenig
`TRADEMARK
`PRINCIPAL
`LIVE
`
`3 mar rrrr=v£=oc
`
`sumcnoc;
`
`|.HOME I SETE INUEXI SEARCH I eBUS|NESS I HELP | PRIVACY POLICY
`
`http ://tmsea1‘ch.uspt0.g0V/bin/gate.exe?f=doc&state=4805%3 Apelein.2.3
`
`7/27/20 15
`
`
`
`Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
` United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Home I Site Index I Search I FAQ I Glossary I Guides Iconlzacts I eBusinessIeBiz aIertsINwsI Help
`
`Trademarks > Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`TESS was last updated on Mon Jul 27 03:22:42 EDT 2015
`
`,I=r"‘;‘5'&¥iiJF5EI"-E
`f'Is.~:»?E.1ox:
`
`--/.-1:-~~
`pmzni"-'-.«:»re:».q um-.
`E‘T£5‘:IJiZ':I"i.|H?Il
`Pray:-I Doc NE:<.TI')-:7:
`LA5-T
`
`EEQTTQM
`
`{;;mR,;_1t;-,-
`
`Please Iogout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you.
`
`List At:I:IOR
`
`to record:|:| Record 2 out of 5
`
`'"‘55"3*‘ 5"*“”3. I "*3 3“‘“5 . ( Use the "Back" button of the Internet Browser to
`1
`return to TESS)
`
`INCAN MEAL
`
`Word Mark
`
`INCAN MEAL
`
`Goods and Services
`Standard Characters
`Claimed
`
`IC 030. US 046. G & S: Grain-based natural meal replacement bars
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`Serial Number
`
`(4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`86457218
`
`Filing Date
`Current Basis
`
`November 18, 2014
`‘I B
`
`Original Filing Basis
`(';::';:'i‘§gnf°'
`Owner
`
`Attorney of Record
`Disclaimer
`
`‘IB
`April 7, 2015
`(APPLICANT) Inca Tea, LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OHIO 6462 State Road,
`Suite O-19 Panna OHIO 44134
`
`Sandra M. Koenig
`NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "MEAL" APART FROM THE
`MARK AS SHOWN
`
`Type of Mark
`Register
`LiveIDead Indicator
`
`TRADEMARK
`PRINCIPAL
`LIVE
`
`TE55 |—[r:3,\,y;»;
`
`l'”'I.tia'r'DD::
`
`3’~IE3ITEflC.:C
`
`I_IIr::=l
`Hwzz-w.~,:l
`LA.=s'r‘£3<3a:
`
`06
`
`H L‘
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`CUETI? :L.I§-‘T
`
`http://tmsea1‘ch.uspto. gov/bin/gate.exe?%doc&state=4805 %3Apelein.2.2
`
`7/27/20 1 5

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site