`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: May 24, 2013
`
`Applicant: Shlomo Silber
`Serial No.: 85707327
`Filed: 8/19/2012
`Mark: COWORK.RS
`
`
`
`RACHEL D BRANDEIS-DANIELOV
`LAW OFFICES OF BRANDEIS & ASSOCIATES
`10818 72ND AVE STE 2,
`FOREST HILLS, NY 11375-5339 UNITED STATES
`
`
`
`Karl Kochersperger, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`Counsel for Yonathan Abenaim, potential opposer herein, has
`on May 24, 2013 filed a request for a further 60-day
`extension of time in which to file an opposition to the
`above-identified application.
`
`The additional extension of time requested on behalf of
`potential opposer, if granted, would result in total
`extensions of time aggregating 180 days from the date
`of publication of applicant's mark.
`
`Extensions of time to oppose may be granted only as
`provided in Trademark Rule 2.102:1
`
` …
`
` (3) After receiving one or two extensions of time
`totaling ninety days, a person may file one final
`request for an extension of time for an additional
`sixty days. The Board will grant this request only
`upon written consent or stipulation signed by the
`applicant or its authorized representative, or a
`written request by the potential opposer or its
`authorized representative stating that the applicant or
`its authorize representative has consented to the
`
`
`1 Trademark Rule 2.102 was recently amended. See, Rules of
`Practice for Trademark-Related Filings Under the Madrid Protocol
`Implementation Act, 68 Fed. Reg. 55,748 (Sept. 26, 2003). The
`amended rule applies to any potential opposer which filed its
`first extension of time against a particular application on or
`after November 2, 2003. Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`Extension of Time to Oppose No. 85707327
`
`
`request, or a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
`No further extensions of time to file an opposition
`will be granted under any circumstances.
`
`Inasmuch as the circumstances recited in the instant request
`are not deemed to be extraordinary in nature, and since
`there is no indication that applicant has consented thereto,
`the request is denied. Potential opposer's remedy lies in
`the filing of a petition for cancellation after applicant's
`application has matured into registration or filing a notice
`of opposition by the existing due date.
`
`
`
`2