`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`Mailed: July 31, 2012
`
`Applicant: Apple Inc.
`Serial No.: 85335777
`Filed: 6/1/2011
`Mark: ICLOUD
`
`
`
`THOMAS R LA PERLE
`APPLE INC
`1 INFINITE LOOP
`CUPERTINO, CA 95014-2083
`UNITED STATES
`
`
`
`Nicole Thier, Paralegal Spcialist:
`
`Counsel for iCloud Inc., potential opposer herein, has on
`July 30, 2012 filed a request for a further 60-day extension
`of time in which to file an opposition to the above-
`identified application.
`
`Extensions of time to oppose may be granted only as
`provided in Trademark Rule 2.102:1
`
` …
`
` (3) After receiving one or two extensions of time
`totaling ninety days, a person may file one final
`request for an extension of time for an additional
`sixty days. The Board will grant this request only
`upon written consent or stipulation signed by the
`applicant or its authorized representative, or a
`written request by the potential opposer or its
`authorized representative stating that the applicant or
`its authorize representative has consented to the
`request, or a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
`No further extensions of time to file an opposition
`will be granted under any circumstances.
`
`
`
`1 Trademark Rule 2.102 was recently amended. See, Rules of
`Practice for Trademark-Related Filings Under the Madrid Protocol
`Implementation Act, 68 Fed. Reg. 55,748 (Sept. 26, 2003). The
`amended rule applies to any potential opposer which filed its
`first extension of time against a particular application on or
`after November 2, 2003. Id.
`
`
`
`Inasmuch as the circumstances recited in the instant request
`are not deemed to be extraordinary in nature, and since
`there is no indication that applicant has consented thereto,
`the request is denied. Potential opposer's remedy lies in
`the filing of a consented request for an extension of time
`no later than August 1, 2012 or by filing a petition for
`cancellation after applicant's application has matured into
`registration.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
