Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA577264
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`12/18/2013
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`85074999
`Pedifix, Inc.
`DEXTERITY
`DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN
`KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERON
`425 5TH AVENUE, FLOOR 5
`NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223
`UNITED STATES
`dbk@kirschsteinlaw.com
`Amended Brief on Appeal
`DEXTERITY LTR_20131218114010.pdf(29330 bytes )
`AMENDED_20131218114028.pdf(2712418 bytes )
`David B. Kirschstein
`dbk@kirschsteinlaw.com
`/David B. Kirschstein/
`12/18/2013
`
`Proceeding
`Applicant
`Applied for Mark
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Attachments
`
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`
`

`
`KIRSCHSTEIN, ISRAEL, SCHIFFMILLER 8: PIERONI , P.C.
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`PATENT, TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT CAUSES
`
`ALAN ISRAEL
`MARTIN W. SCHIFFMILLER
`LISA A. PIERONI
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN
`
`425 FIFTH AVENUE
`5"‘ FLOOR
`NEW YORK, N.Y.
`IOOI6-2223
`
`(2 I 2) 697~375O
`
`(2 I 2) 949- I 690
`FACSIMILE:
`WRITERS E-MAIL: DBK@KlRSCHSTElNLAW.COM
`
`MORRIS KIRSCHSTEIN
`(I9 I 8-I978)
`
`BER'I'RAM OTI'INGER
`(l937~|986)
`
`December 17, 2013
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`P.O. Box 145 1
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`Re:
`
`Trademark:
`
`DEXTERITY
`
`Ser. No.:
`
`Fi1.Dt.:
`
`85-074,999
`
`June 30, 2010
`
`Applicant:
`
`Pedifix, Inc.
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Applicant submitted its Brief of Appeal on December 13, 2013. It has been noted that
`several corrections are required, particularly, the identification of the mark involved in the
`appeal. On page 4 of the brief, the mark was incorrectly identified as DEXTERITY BY
`PEDIFIX, whereas this appeal relates to the mark DEXTERITY. Accordingly, this Amended
`Brief on Appeal from the final refusal in Serial No. 85-074,999 is sub mitted and includes a few
`other corrections along with an Appendix A.
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN
`
`DBK:dge
`enclosure
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In Re:
`Ser. No.:
`
`Trademark Application of Pedifix, Inc.
`85-074,999
`
`Filing Dt.:
`Trademark:
`
`June 30, 2010
`DEXTERITY
`
`TM Atty.:
`
`Sara N. Benjamin, Law Office 110
`
`AMENDED BRIEF ON APPEAL
`
`Prepared by:
`
`David B. Kirschstein, Esq.
`Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.
`425 Fifth Avenue, 5”‘ Floor
`
`New York, NY 10016-2223
`
`(212) 697-3750
`
`

`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`ISSUE
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Point 1 -
`
`Comparison of Applicant’s Goods as listed to Those
`of Reg. No. 4,273,785 - DEXTERITE
`
`Point 2 -
`
`Comparison of Applicant’s Goods as listed to Those
`of Reg. No. 3,994,623 - DEXTERITY
`
`Point 3 —
`
`The Applicable Law Supports Applicant’s
`Position that Confusion is Not Likely
`
`Point 4 —
`
`All Three Marks Involved in This Case
`
`Have a Suggestive Aspect
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Appendix A
`
`Page
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`6
`
`8
`
`9
`
`11
`
`1 1
`
`

`
`TABLE OF CASES
`
`
`Astra Pharmaceutical Products Inc. V. Beckman Instruments Inc.,
`
`718 F.2d 1201, 110 USPQ 786 (1S‘ Cir. 1983)
`
`Bongrain International gAmerican ) Corp. V. Delice de France, Inc.,
`811 F.2d 1479, 1 USPQ2d 1775, 1779 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
`
`Electronic Design and Sales Inc. V. Electronic Data Systems,
`954 F.2d 713, 21 USPQ2d 1388, 1392~93 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
`
`General Electric Company V. Graham Magnetics Corporation,
`197 USPQ 690 (TTAB 1997)
`
`Harvey Hubbell Incorgorated V. Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd.
`188 USPQ 517 (TTAB 197)
`
`In re Cotter, 179 USPQ 828 (TTAB 1973)
`
`
`In re E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co.
`
`476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973)
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`
`STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`Applicant, Pedifix, Inc. has appealed the refusal to register its mark DEXTERIT. Said
`
`refusal was made under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act. It is the Examining Attorney’s
`
`position that the use of the mark DEXTERITY by applicant on its goods is likely to cause
`
`confusion as to source with the use of the marks of cited Registration Nos. 3,994,623 for the
`
`mark DEXTERITY and 4,273,785 for DEXTERITE on said registrants’ goods.
`
`In the final refusal issued on September 17, 2013, the Examining Attorney reiterated her
`
`previous refusals under Section 2(d) and objected to the identification of goods. When applicant
`
`filed its Notice of Appeal, it included an amended identification of goods which reads as follows:
`
`Silicone gel sheeting for the treatment of scars; support bandages, namely, wearable pads
`for the hands for use in cushioning and protecting the metacarpal heads and to protect the
`thumb and other digits from forceful trauma, pressure, shock and shear; support bandages
`used to cushion the base of the thumb and reduce tenderness over palmar incisions, finger
`support bandages, finger guards for medical purposes; exercise articles for rehabilitation
`and therapeutic purposes, namely, polymer gel spheres for muscular rehabilitation; pads
`for preventing pressure sores; compression sleeve for treating swelling and circulatory
`disorders, anti-inflammatory gel pad for treating sports injuries and tissue trauma;
`gel-based joint protector sleeves for the hands, thumb and wrists for medical purposes;
`carpal tunnel relief sleeves, terrycloth gloves and mittens with gel inserts for use in heat
`therapy for the hands
`
`The Board treated this as a Request for Reconsideration and returned the file to the Examining
`
`Attorney for further action. She, in turn, denied the Request for Consideration, repeating her
`
`rejection under Section 2(d). Inasmuch as no comment was made with respect to the newly
`
`submitted identification of goods, it is believed that it has been accepted and, in fact, applicant’s
`
`goods as set forth above are what are listed in the TESS database.
`
`

`
`The goods set forth in Reg. No. 4,273,7 85 for the mark DEXTERITE read as follows:
`
`Class 9 - Equipment for camera image processing for surgical manipulation, namely,
`computers; computer software for surgical manipulation systems, namely, operating
`software for surgical devices
`
`Class l0 - Articulated and motor driven instruments for use in urology, gynecology,
`vascular, cardiac and gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery; artificial limbs, eyes and
`teeth; orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopedic braces; robotic surgical apparatus and
`instruments, namely, surgical articulated and motor driven instruments; computerized
`apparatus and instruments for surgical manipulation, namely, surgical articulated and
`motor driven instruments; articulated and motor driven arms for surgical manipulation;
`electrical surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, surgical articulated and motor
`driven instruments; jointed and motorised surgical apparatus and instruments for
`endoscopic and laproscopic surgery
`
`The goods set forth in Reg. No. 3,994,623 for the mark DEXTERITY read as follows:
`
`Medical examination and surgical gloves; disposable medical gloves
`
`ISSUE
`
`The issue is whether applicant’s mark as applied to its goods is confusingly similar to the
`
`marks set forth in the cited registrations. Applicant does not dispute the Examining Attorney’s
`
`statement that the marks themselves are either identical or close. What applicant does dispute is
`
`the Examining Attorney’s holding that the goods to which it applies its mark are so closely
`
`related to those of the cited registrations that there is likely to be confusion as to source.
`
`

`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Point 1 —
`
`Comparison of Applicant’s Goods as listed to Those
`of Reg. No. 4,273,785 - DEXTERITE
`
`The pertinent goods in Reg. No. 4,273,785 are those of Class 10. It is immediately
`
`apparent from the description and listing of these goods that they are entirely different from those
`
`to which applicant applies its marks. Goods such as “articulated and motor driven instruments
`
`for use in urology, gynecology, vascular, cardiac and gastrointestinal laporoscopic surgery”
`
`would certainly be purchased only by medical professionals such as doctors and surgeons and the
`
`channels of trade for such goods would be medical supply houses, hospitals and the like.
`
`“Artificial limbs, eyes and teeth” are not sold over the counter but, rather, by professionals and
`
`institutions in the field of medicine for use by their patients. Orthopedic braces would be
`
`purchased from a medical supply store under a doctor’s prescription. As to the remainder of the
`
`goods in this registration, they are surgical goods used by medical professionals sold through the
`
`appropriate channels and would not be purchased by the everyday purchasing public.
`
`All of the above is in complete contrast to applicant’s goods which are over—the-counter
`
`items for sale in drug stores, department stores and the like.
`
`It is hard to see how any purchaser
`
`would attribute applicant’s goods such as terry cloth gloves containing a gel sold under its
`
`trademark with those of the registrant sold under the trademark DEXTERITE no matter how the
`
`latter mark is pronounced. Catalog pages showing typical products sold by applicant under the
`
`mark DEXTERITY are attached hereto as Appendix A. These were submitted to the Examining
`
`Attorney with App1icant’s response dated August 27, 2013 to the Office Action of February 27,
`
`2013 and are part of the record.
`
`

`
`To the foregoing should be added that the purchasers of goods such as those set forth in
`
`Reg. No. 4,273,785 are surely not ordinary consumers, and it would be expected that these
`
`purchasers would be careful and sophisticated purchasers, a fact that materially decreases the
`
`likelihood that there would be confusion. Astra Pharmaceutical Products Inc. v. Beckman
`
`Instruments, Inc., 718 F.2d 1201, 110 USPQ 786 (1“ Cir. 1983).
`
`The Examining Attorney takes issue with applicant’s contention that the goods of Reg.
`
`No. 4,273,785 for the mark DEXTERITE as set forth above would be sold to medical
`
`professionals. She focuses on the word “orthopedic” which according to her attached definition
`
`from the Macmillan Dictionary means “relating to the medical treatment of injuries and diseases
`
`affected bones and muscles.” She states that applicant’s identified goods include orthopedic
`
`support bandages as well as finger support bandages and the like.” However, the word
`
`“orthopedic” does not appear in applicant’s current identification of goods. Applicant’s support
`
`bandages, finger guards and the like are not orthopedic articles. One does not consider an anti-
`
`inflammatory gel pad for treating sport injuries as an orthopedic device. Indeed, Dictionary.com,
`
`which is based on The Random House Dictionary defines “orthopedics” as “the medical specialty
`
`concerned with correction of deformities or functional impairment of the skeletal system,
`
`especially the extremities and the spine, and associated structures, as muscles and ligaments.”
`
`(Emphasis supplied)
`
`To conclude on this point, all of applicant’s listed goods are entirely different from those
`
`set forth in cited Reg. No. 4,273,785 and are sold through entirely different channels and
`
`purchased by entirely different classes of purchasers, in the case of the registrant’s goods by
`
`careful, knowledgeable medical professionals as opposed to the ordinary public which purchases
`
`-7-
`
`

`
`applicant’s over-the-counter products.
`
`One further point with respect to cited Reg. No. 4,273,785: although applicant concedes
`
`that the translation of the French word “dexterite” is “dexterity,” it is submitted that the ordinary
`
`English-speaking person in this country would surely pronounce the mark with the hard “I” as in
`
`“dexteright.” The French pronunciation would be “dexteree.” It is submitted that this is an
`
`additional reason why confusion should not be likely.
`
`Point 2 -
`
`Comparison of Applicant’s Goods as listed to Those
`of Reg. No. 3,994,623 - DEXTERITY
`
`With respect to the goods in this registration, the Examiner’s position is that the
`
`“disposable medical gloves” listed in this registration do not have a special or particular function
`
`other than being of medical use and include disposable medical gloves used for any medical
`
`purpose. The Examining Attorney then concludes that the goods of the registration include
`
`applicant’s “terrycloth gloves and mittens with gel inserts for use in heat therapy for the hands”
`
`and may be used for the same purposes as those goods of applicant’s and applicant’s other
`
`medical hand treatment products. The difficulty with this position is that applicant’s goods are
`
`not medical products. They are the products designed to provide comfort and relief to some
`
`common pains and irritations and the like. Moreover, as applicant urged repeatedly in its
`
`responses to the Office Actions during prosecution of this case, applicant’s glove products are
`
`not disposable at all. To the contrary, its terry cloth gloves and mittens and other such products
`
`are designed to be used repeatedly until they wear out or deteriorate. They are not of the nature
`
`that would be considered disposable.
`
`

`
`To the foregoing it is added that the common understanding of “disposable medical
`
`gloves” would be gloves used by doctors, surgeons, nurses or aides for various medical purposes
`
`such as examinations, surgery, applications of topical medications and disposed of thereafter.
`
`Every television program that shows an operating room shows such gloves, not terrycloth gloves
`
`and mittens filled with gel.
`
`All of the foregoing applies also to the medical examination and surgical gloves set forth
`
`in Reg. No. 3,994,623. The purpose of such products is to avoid contamination and the threat of
`
`disease as applicant contends, a purpose which is a far cry from the purpose and use of
`
`applicant’s products.
`
`Point 3 —
`
`The Applicable Law Supports Applicant’s
`Position that Confusion is Not Likely
`
`It is to be emphasized that as the Board has repeatedly stated it is likelihood of confusion,
`
`not a mere possibility of confusion that constitutes a basis for a refusal to register under Section
`
`2(d). For example, see Electronic Design and Sales Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems, 954 F.2d
`
`713, 21 USPQ2d 1388, 1392-93 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (“[O]pposer urges that persons who use
`
`opposer’s data processing and telecommunications services at work and who buy batteries at
`
`retail stores would be confused as to source ...[T]he potential for confusion appears a mere
`
`possibility not a probability”). See also Bongrain International (American) Corp. v. Delice de
`
`France, Inc., 811 F.2d 1479, 1 USPQ2d 1775, 1779 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (The “statute refers to
`
`likelihood, not the mere possibility, of confusion”).
`
`

`
`Another principle directly applicable to this case is that it is incumbent upon the
`
`Examining Attorney to submit evidence to establish that applicant’s goods and those of the cited
`
`registrant are sufficiently related so that confusion as to source would result when such goods are
`
`marketed even under very similar marks. The Examining Attorney has submitted no such
`
`evidence at all on this issue. The third party registrations relied on by the Examining Attorney
`
`surely are not a substitute for actual evidence establishing the required relationship. Companies
`
`sell a variety of goods both related and unrelated and are entitled to register a trademark for such
`
`goods if they have been sold in interstate or foreign commerce. However, the fact that a company
`
`may sell a variety of goods does not make the goods they sell related. For example, Bic Pen
`
`Corporation has registered its famous trademark BIC for pens and razors. Surely this does not
`
`make pens and razors related goods coming within the requirements of In re E.I. duPont de
`
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). In addition, it is pointed out that
`
`The Gillette Company at one time sold and had registrations of the mark GILLETTE for cigarette
`
`lighters and shaving products with which its mark is always associated. Again, that does not
`
`make cigarette lighters and shaving products related products within the requirements of duPont.
`
`See General Electric Company V. Graham Magnetics Corporation, 197 USPQ 690 (TTAB
`
`1977); Harvey Hubbell Incomorated V. Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd., 188 USPQ 517 (TTAB 1975);
`
`and In re Cotter, 179 USPQ 828 (TTAB 1973).
`
`Referring now to the Examining Attorney’s efforts to find a term in the description of
`
`goods of the cited registration that may generally describe applicant’s goods, the Board has held
`
`that this is not sufficient to establish applicant’s and the registrants’ goods are related. See
`
`General Electric Company, supra [It is not enough to find one term that may generally describe
`
`-10-
`
`

`
`the goods.].
`
`Point 4 -
`
`All Three Marks Involved in This Case
`
`Have a Suggestive Aspect
`
`Dictionary.com defines “dexterity” as “skill or adroitness in using the hands or body;
`
`agility.” Broadly speaking, the mark DEXTERITE of Reg. No. 4,273,785 as applied to the listed
`
`goods therein is somewhat suggestive, particularly when referring to the robotic arms and the
`
`desired results of using them. Likewise,
`
`the mark DEXTERITY of Reg. No. 3,994,623 suggests
`
`that the nature of the goods is such that they can be used with a reasonable amount of skill for
`
`their intended purpose. Accordingly, the marks of the two cited registrations should not be
`
`granted such a broad scope as to preclude registration of applicant’s mark which also has a
`
`suggestive aspect in some respects.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`It is respectfully submitted that in View of the vastly different goods to which the cited
`
`registrations are applied and the goods to which applicant applies the mark sought to be
`
`registered, one of the critical requirements of duPont for a 2(d) rejection has not been met by the
`
`Examining Attorney. Accordingly, it is urged that confusion is not likely in this case.
`
`Wherefore, it is respectfully submitted that the refusal to register should be reversed.
`
`-11-
`
`

`
`
`
`APPENDIX AAPPENDIX A
`
`

`
`Wirfief 20? 1/20
`
`E2
`
`Praéyafs
`
`04%
`
`O~42l.
`
`5 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`M/tobiiity
`
`
`MOTKDN * INCREASE CIt2CUL/WON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m 1' ttczns .
`
`Tfzert:2z.zl
`
`imzzgizzg
`I’}2of() :'zfi‘e2'
`1 1/: mirmI:<«z.s‘
`
`trwzaririg
`1‘v’a zfm.(I2 try
`
`V
`Tazgetesi .H€£Zf
`Thy‘,-a;;y
`
`Mo£5Iw‘izir1g Gel Inside
` Red 3 z?a:zz‘Z9zzr5z‘ irzcifccztesf "’c¢mti0:/1”
`
`
`
`wh.ez=2 nzittcazlz is heated.
`
`; Before Hecming
`
`
`
`Features:
`e It/lmrovvavebte, tcztgeted Flax Seed warming zones
`provide deep and gentle heat and moist therapy
`e Microwovebte M~Get lining moisturizes the entire hand
`» Adjustable for 0 custom fit
`« Soft and comtortctbte Fteece cute: cm/er
`a Natutoi bomntcets one essential one
`
`a Dermatologist-testeci & Hyptmltergenic
`
`’_t"czz;,gfeted I<I{.Zx Seed
`fieai ’I’lzempy Zones
`
`

`
` Pl'Ol'@C'l'lOl'W corlllnued
`
`
`2" Carpal fume} Relief Sleeve
`%z?~{
`Armlomicelly designed gel pod halos prevent end rec'u<:e shock, impocl,
`
`pl‘8S$U:'(-2 and vim ‘sen. l2e:luces dlscomlcsrl caused by lwpersensll
`.
`lcleoi for kelold and hyperlrophac scomng
`is 0 result of plusllc.I':ecor.--
`slruclive surgery, injul'-,/ or burnsbreol for some! lurmel pesmp. lvlirl«e:ol
`OE! gel pod helps prevent and reduce lhe appearance of scar
`ue, 4--
`way’ slreiel: fabric Ollews lull ‘W133!’ mollon. Provides \I’v'(li’l'1’l1h and méld
`=
`Supports prolecls compresses, {H0 and post op for Gospel
`
`
`80'2€)~SL
`8O20_U_
`
`Sl8,00
`$1800
`
`8920-SR €318.00
`8020M?
`Sumo
`
`€11?-<22?
`
`:"m;i.c€<:*
`
`§
`
`
`
`
` 3%?»
`Min? Microfiber Ful!y~£ined Gloves
`Full gel coverage lo: llle enllre ?lt:n<'£. Sell, easily slrelcheal lomlc
`
`helpreducell1oc:ppeor(lnce 0% old and new scars. Mo:
`lzes lhe en:
`
`
`hand (lr<;ludlng culicles). Helps will; eczema and psoriaeis. Plovides
`
`warmth and mild compn" slon to the enlne h-rm".
` l7l)
`$1?4501;")[4
`
` §2x§‘~$e§ E!bow~J<>inf Prefecfion Sleeve
`Can be used as <1 padding lo prolect ihe ulnar news 0:‘ as on arliiieiol
`rm pod lo prolecl lhe elbow. Soolhes: as well as sollens dz, cracked skin.
`
`
` lIl~25~S -fifi SR8” L X 3' W)= 310.25
`
`
`
`W)£3./l6” l.. X 314264.. $10.75
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§%/§~<vE3e§ Carpal Iunnei Relief Pad
`'lhln,. three cfimenslonal gel pad with adhesive booking fits ln gloves, splints and braces. Provides cushlo ‘
`
`
`senslllve same lo lmglrove gmsp and ‘
`hl izeorlng. lvloy relzeve discomfort caused by hypersenssli
`v
`
`
`reduaie lhe appearance of 01:‘; on
`scars. Can be ll1C0[_DOl'€3lz’iG'
`info cuslom made or off~€h
`..
`
`braces. Sl.Ef3¥lOl‘3S, pmiecls, com»
`sees, ore and post op for Cmgaal
`el and -3? Release Soars.
`
`HO()l<Bl}C.»(lllg 80l2 Qmmlhlck S7.50~ l./9
`
`frlook Booking 8032 éimmlhick S'7,(){) l./pk.
`2
`
`Self Adhesive 8()D8 Sm
`Self—/ldllesive 8008 gm
`
`
`
`<3
`
`Cass 800«z112él~556l
`
`~
`
`l-bx;800—43'l—780l
`
`~ www,De><l‘erll\/Hondlherapy,<;:om
`
`
`
`\
`
`
`{;§-cf .§’r2.s‘i;z’e
`
`
`
`Min? Microfiber
`Elbow Sleeve-
`Ulnoz DOG prolecloi, Hydmles skin on son;
`‘
`_
`__
`4
`
`loci,
`llnsngreleoeeslwdralors,lllumms
`8: es meal oils. M
`oendllions
`
`dry z:l':3cE»<ed elbows‘ Helps prevent mm J2’)
`& colluses. (3usl':ions elbows on conlocl.
`Warm, gently protective, non bulky.
`Ideal
`for Lalerol Eplcondylc-sis_ Ulnar l\l'eLm%ls,
`Elbow Celslusions, more.
`130
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`S4 .60 ~ l/pk
`$4 .00
`S400 —
`34.00 —
`
`
`
`Proieciion
`
`ii/?"’~«$oI Pad wifh Finger Loop
`Comfortable,
`soft gel susliions and proiecis the
`
`
` 4DG4~Sl..
`r'riel:iccr;>ril heads (voiorly and dorsoily).Al.)sorbs
`
`4GG4~Sl'<‘
`S§1OC§<,l@dLl
`s:;hem'<rnr§;>r'
`ros‘oi'cos.Willnoiilrm
`
`
`4OO4~5..l.
`ten like foam or tell produ<:i5.
`uy be used to cushion
`
`r3()Ci4«i..R
`bnsiz of lliui':'rl'2 or? roriur':o iranriv
`ss ovor [')UIl‘:'I(1l in-
`
`cisions, especially when grcxsping
`in r‘
`lzeclsi Reo-
`
`oriimendeu‘ for second, ihird omi
`
`Padding
`
`
`
`
`Gm’ Pazi
` 3% Q
`
`CMC/MP Join? Frofector
`Iwim
`Sofi gel cushions and proieois iiie mralocorpal heads
`
`
`
`
`/
`(voloriy and riorsollyilvlosg be user) to cushion hrrse of
`‘ /
`thumb or in reduce ionrierness over palmrir incisions,
`
`
`A
`especially when grasping firm oi>jecis.Low girofile riesign
`iiis comiorinbly under spiinls or braces. ideal for lrig _ or
`
`
`old or new scrirs,
`finger. Gel is effective in improving the appearance of
`
`4306-3
`4303i
`
`Mme: arr/rc:i,4vrr= Profecfor
`
`traumo,
`Sol? Gel cushions and or 1
`‘
`'
`'
`pressure; shock and shear. Aiioches in ihumb. Thin
`design iiis un-Ller splinis or braces.
`
`
`4378'3
`4316“L
`
`
`
`$l‘3~'/3E3 - Wk
`3 3 3-70 " "«’i3l’\
`
`" F/ilk
`36-99 “ Wk
`
`
`
`
`
`§§Lééc'él€;é;rlé;§2:y Disk wifh Aéééérve
`Adhesive Bock om) lvlyioi Too. Spot Relief. May be
`used 30 off ioari piessirre, absorb Shock or shear‘
`for
`-:s_. and $0 reduce scar lissue. 6mm thick, soii, pure
`M~Gel mineral oil moiséurizes skin iii poinl of conioci.
`May holy;
`irriprovo iho opp
`co oi‘ old and
`scars.
`;»7eelv-and:-slick adhesive ixrcking for secure
`[li(iCei'ri9i'§3 iri orr,rcr:s, splinls, ere. Trim lo iii.
`
`4” Body Square with Adhesive
`.\,
`$1
`Adhesive Bock and Mylar “mp. Spof Relief,
`ivloy be
`used lo oiilomi pressure, absorb shozrk or shear forces,
`
`and lo roriuco so .
`ssuo. Smmihicis, soél, p=.nrolvl~iIu‘ol
`minero! oii moisturizes skin 0! pain? of conicsci. May
`new iirrprovo the opper'rr'(rnr;o oi oid rmri ne‘-.I~/ scars.
`Po -and-stick <2-rihosive booking for some placement
`in braces, splints, sic. Trirn in ii:.
`
`
`
`
`i35'l 91.0”)
`335.3 {2.5”‘i
`
`
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`r‘ixiw<“y.sf Dots with Adhesive
`
`
`
`i’\;'lG\/ be used in ioclucse Db;’(lSlO|l, friction and pressure in 0 soiinf, cost, or
`Sooi relioi‘.
`or ceiirier. Smrrzi ck, 25rnr‘ri
`‘
`rieierli/l»€3ei<iol3 wiihpressurosensiiive uo“nesive.Aiso
`usoiixi lo proloiti man A; oromin ,nr:os G3 on irrdividuui rmsshion. Trim lo iii.
`
`4350
`
`3] 1,35 4_ 15 dais’,-pk
`
` 5”‘:/»‘?v«{‘;«f>‘§; 2.5” Disk with Hook Backing
`
`Sool relief. Sol! gel wilir ilooia bockirw siicks to various surfaces Frrsély irirnmer.i for precise
`
`
`" ‘
`ix-‘lay be userl lo offload pressure, absorb shock or shear woes, and to reduce scar
`
`
`sue. 6rr=-rn iliii,:i<, sofi. mire
`rriinerol oil rilOiS?Uii2E3S skin oi point of corilocl. l.~1oy
`
`help imgirr
`hr: o;>p<-zczroricri of old and riow score, ‘mm in iii. Woslioolo and r<-zusriiilrz.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§r§-v€Z:§§§*§ 4” X 6” Square wffh Hook Backing
`Soot relief. Soii g
`"'llh hook booking siir.-l<s to various S1Jifi}C9f§. Easily irimmod for precise
`
`
`iiiiing, lvloy be used lo oiilocrd pressure, absorb shock or shear éorces. and to reduce scar
`356%.} mm
`5 l 260 ~ 2/pk
`
`35Ei€i»€3==ain
`S i 3."if> ~ '2./;)l<
`
`
`
`»P{1-‘C99! Paiyurefhcmei F1 rxibie $e~:'£Adhesrve'£?ofs _
`Spot reiief. Versoliie oppiicolionsio Cushion, proleol, absorb pressureund ll'lCil0n,lil
`splint, costs, or braces. Peel~0rid—siick adhesive booking for secure plucemeni, 3min
`ihi (soft gei oroiecis prominencos. Adhesive propeiiies are in iiie gel and safe for use
`direclly on ilie skin. Washable and reusable‘ Trim ii; iii.
`
`’
`
`87
`
`$3»50~ 5 f1015>‘»"'i3"~
`
`
`
`CQll8GO«42z1~E">5<’3‘r
`
`« Fox: 80=Ci~/.13?-780i
`
`v www.Dexieri‘l‘yHc:ndTheropyrzom
`
`-ij>